City Council Report 915 I Street, 1 st Floor Sacramento, CA

Similar documents
City of Sacramento City Council 915 I Street, Sacramento, CA,

SECTION 2 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

ORDINANCE NO THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF SANTA ROSA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

SAN FRANCISCO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT FACILITIES, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION ADDENDUM NO. 2

ART SERVICES AND ACQUISITION AGREEMENT *******************************************************************************

PUBLIC ART PROGRAM Guidelines for Site Plan Projects

Item 10F 1 of 87

Certificate by the Architect: Certified that no addition and deletion has been made to the tender documents downloaded from the IIT Madras web site.

SAN DIEGO CITY SCHOOLS

Mr. Bill Bickham Mr. Gary Mauller Ms. Kathy Kittredge Ms. Hollie Saunders Ms. Amy Eyman

A. This section specifies procedural requirements for Shop Drawings, product data, samples, and other miscellaneous Work-related submittals.

PLANNING DIVISION COMMUNITY & NEIGHBORHOODS DEPARTMENT

VINTAGE ORIGINAL ART MURAL REGISTRATION PROCESS

APPLICATION DESIGN REVIEW Please Print or Type

EL PASO COMMUNITY COLLEGE PROCEDURE

Brad Luke. Director Peddle Thorp Auckland

International Sculpture Garden Relationship Statement

ENTER INTO CONTRACT WITH JOHN R JURGENSEN FOR FY2012 SOUTH LEBANON MASON-MORROW-MILLGROVE ROAD CDBG PHASE II PROJECT

-and- (the Artist ) maquette means the drawing or model, prepared by the Artist, of the proposed Art Work;

SITE PLAN Application Packet (Required For All Non-Residential Development Projects)

SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION

WGA LOW BUDGET AGREEMENT

Community & Economic Development Department Planning Division Frederick Street PO Box 8805 Moreno Valley, CA SUBMITAL REQUIREMENTS

CONNECTICUT LOTTERY CORPORATION OFFICIAL GAME RULES Connecticut Lucky-4-Life"

This Call for Qualifications does not require the preparation of a design proposal.

This contract is for services and products related to a photography shoot (hereafter Shoot ) to take place at the following time and place.

Intellectual Property

PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT between THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA and INSERT PARTNER'S CORPORATE NAME

CITY COUNCIL CONSENT CALENDAR

CHAPTER 3. Public Schools Facility Element

pill Los Angeles World Airports

ADMINISTRATIVE DESIGN REVIEW Information

SECTION ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS SECTION ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS

PUBLIC ART PROCUREMENT GUIDELINES

Efficient Tactics of Project Management

REPORT. Chair and Members of the San Diego Housing Commission For the Agenda of November 20, 2015

LAW ON TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER 1998

The following draft Agreement supplements, but does not replace, the MOU by and between the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the California

Loyola University Maryland Provisional Policies and Procedures for Intellectual Property, Copyrights, and Patents

CITY OF NAPERVILLE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TEAM ELEVATOR INSTALLATION/MODERNIZATION/REPAIR

Pismo Beach Public Art Program Outline

Accepting Equity When Licensing University Technology

Answer: Qualification statement should be provided with the bid.

Accepting Equity When Licensing University Technology

This Licence document replaces the version of the Licence issued by the Office of Communications (Ofcom) on 23 March 2015 to EE Limited.

PROJECT TITLE PROJECT NO: CONTRACT TITLE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS CITY, CALIFORNIA

Simonson Design Lab, Inc. Design Agreement

(1) Patents/Patentable means:

CITY OF PALMDALE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA ORDINANCE NO. 1415

City of Deltona. Agenda Memo

CHAPTER 30 PUBLIC ART. Article I. In General

UW REGULATION Patents and Copyrights

REQUEST FOR QUOTATION INVITATION

TERMS AND CONDITIONS. for the use of the IMDS Advanced Interface by IMDS-AI using companies

exceptional circumstance:

CITY OF ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

Public Art Network Best Practice Goals and Guidelines

TOWN OF MORAGA ART IN PUBLIC SPACES POLICY

Technology transactions and outsourcing deals: a practitioner s perspective. Michel Jaccard

This Licence replaces the licence issued by Ofcom on 25 April 2006 to Manx Telecom Limited.

1. The Office of Communications (Ofcom) grants this wireless telegraphy licence ( the Licence ) to

19th Annual Holiday Craft Fair

CHAPTER 11 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN APPROVAL PROCESS

Section Meetings Section Material and Equipment. None Required

Toronto Reference Library Premium Rental Space Renovation Award of Tender

TOWN OF AMHERST PLANNING DEPARTMENT MINOR SITE PLAN AND MINOR ADJUSTMENT REVIEW AND APPROVAL PROCEDURE

CITY OF FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA JAMES M. MESSER CITY ATTORNEY EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT. THIS EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of

PROCEDURE FOR PROCESSING WORKING DRAWINGS

ORDINANCE NO Adopted by the Sacramento City Council. July 13, 2010

Last updated 8/26/2013

Lewis-Clark State College No Date 2/87 Rev. Policy and Procedures Manual Page 1 of 7

Working Drawing Manual

Scope of Services. Project management tasks are estimated based upon anticipated project duration of 52 weeks.

Exhibit Display Rules and Regulations

Exhibit A Project Identification. Exhibit B Project Charter / Project Intent. Exhibit C Project Scope. Exhibit C Project Schedule

UCCS University Hall Fire Sprinkler System Upgrade March 1, 2011 RTA SECTION SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES PART 1 - GENERAL

POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR PROCESSING ARTWORK PURCHASES

Architectural Design Process

White Lake Township Building Dept Highland Rd. (248) White Lake, MI Fax (248)

This Licence replaces the licence issued by Ofcom on 22 April 2013 to British Telecommunications PLC.

NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY PROJECT NAME JOB # ISSUED: 03/29/2017

Proposal PROJECT MANUAL P R O P E R T Y M A N A G E M E N T F A L L O N C O U N T Y. Baker, MT P.O. Box 846

Site Plan/Building Permit Review

Riverside, California A Local Government CEQA Perspective

SQUAW VALLEY PUBLIC SERVICE DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING MINUTES #830 August 29, 2017

Article 4 PROCEDURES for PLOT PLAN and SITE PLAN REVIEW

WGA LOW BUDGET AGREEMENT--APPLICATION

CHAPTER ELECTRIC AND MAGNETIC FIELDS

SECTION CONTRACTOR SUBMITTALS. A. All submittals by the CONTRACTOR shall be submitted to the ENGINEER.

REVISION #1. Section. fire alarm B. C. the hot. intent of. required. manufacturer. materials. C. Warranty

SECTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND COORDINATION

INDEX OF SPECIFICATIONS SECTION F SPECIAL CONDITIONS DIVISION 1 - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS:

INSTRUCTION FOR BIDDERS FOR PROVIDING ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR THE UPGRADATION OF A GOVERNMENT HOSPITAL IN KERALA

CITY OF LOVELAND VISUAL ARTS COMMISSION ACQUISITION POLICY

COLQUITT COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 101 East Central Avenue

Public Art Mural Packet

AMENDED IN COMMITTEE 8/1/16 RESOLUTION NO

JEFFERSON LAB TECHNICAL ENGINEERING & DEVELOPMENT FACILITY (TEDF ONE) Newport News, Virginia

F98-3 Intellectual/Creative Property

Spectrum Licence Wireless Cable Service (500 & 600 MHz Band)

Transcription:

City Council Report 915 I Street, 1 st Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 www.cityofsacramento.org File ID: 2018-00196 March 20, 2018 Consent Item 14 Title: Contract: Fort Natomas Shade Structure Location: District 3 Recommendation: Pass a Resolution: 1) approving the construction plans and specifications for the Fort Natomas Shade Structure Project, a sub-project to Measure U Park Improvements (L19706000); 2) awarding the contract to Olympic Land Construction in the amount of $266,935; 3) authorizing the City Manager or City Manager s designee to execute the contract; and 4) appropriating $175,000 from Park Development Impact Fees (Fund 3204) available fund balance to the Measure U Park Improvements Project (L19706000). Contact: C. Gary Hyden, Park Planning and Development Services Manager, (916) 808-1949; Jason Wiesemann, Landscape Architect, (916) 808-7634, Department of Youth, Parks, & Community Enrichment Presenter: None Attachments: 1-Description/Analysis 2-Contract 3-Resolution Susana Alcala Wood, City Attorney Mindy Cuppy, City Clerk John Colville, City Treasurer Howard Chan, City Manager Page 1 of 87

File ID: 2018-00196 Consent Item 14 Description/Analysis Issue Detail: The Department of Youth, Parks, & Community Enrichment is seeking approval to award a contract to Olympic Land Construction for the Fort Natomas Shade Structure project in the amount of $266,935. The project would be funded with Measure U proceeds (34%) and Park Development Impact Fees (66%). The improvements will consist of installing storm drain adjustments, irrigation, landscaping improvements, rubber surfacing repairs, and shade structures. The formal bid process for this project has been completed and Olympic Land Construction has been selected as the lowest responsible and responsive bidder. Construction of the Fort Natomas Shade Structure project is expected to be completed in August 2018. Fort Natomas Play Structure is located within South Natomas Community Park. South Natomas Community Park is a 25.11-acre community park located at 2901 Truxel Road, in Community Planning Area 9, Council District 3. Policy Considerations: City Code Chapter 3.60 provides that City Council approval is required to enter into construction agreements over $100,000. Council Resolution 2017-0246, Section 4.1 requires that all appropriation changes (increases or decreases) in excess of $100,000 to the Approved Budget shall be approved by resolution of the City Council. Providing parks and recreation facilities is consistent with the City s strategic plan to enhance livability in Sacramento s neighborhoods by expanding park, recreation, and trail facilities throughout the City. This is also part of the Park Development Process for park planning as stated in the 2005-2010 Parks and Recreation Master Plan. Economic Impacts: The indicated economic impacts are estimates calculated using a calculation tool developed by the Center for Strategic Economic Research (CSER). CSER utilized the IMPLAN input-output model (2009 coefficients) to quantify the economic impacts of a hypothetical $1 million of spending in various construction categories within the City of Sacramento in an average one-year period. Actual impacts could differ significantly from the estimates and neither the City of Sacramento nor CSER shall be held responsible for consequences resulting from such differences. The park construction project, in the amount of $266,935 is expected to create 1.06 jobs (0.61 direct jobs and 0.45 indirect jobs through indirect and induced activities). Furthermore, it will create $164,815 in total economic output ($103,884 of direct output and $60,931 of output through indirect and induced activities). City of Sacramento March 20, 2018 powered by Legistar Page 2 of 87

File ID: 2018-00196 Consent Item 14 Environmental Considerations: The Environmental Services Manager has reviewed the project for compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and determined that it is exempt from the provisions of the CEQA pursuant to Section 15303 of the CEQA Guidelines, Construction of Small Structures. Sustainability: The Fort Natomas Shade Structure Project has been reviewed for consistency with the goals, policies, and targets of the City s Sustainability Master Plan (SMP), the Parks and Recreation Sustainability Plan, and the 2035 General Plan. The Project will advance the goals, policies, and targets of these plans by improving the health of residents through access to a diverse mix of wellness and recreation activities. The park improvements are also consistent with sustainable design through the use of recycled materials and local vendors. Commission/Committee Action: None Rationale for Recommendation: The formal bidding process for the Fort Natomas Shade Structure was posted in accordance with City Code 3.60 and Administrative Policy AP-4002. The bids were opened on January 17, 2018. Staff received 2 bids and the results are listed below: CONTRACTOR Base Bid Additive Total Bid LBE% Alternate Abide Builders $175,537 $61,290 $236,827 95% Olympic Land Construction $156,035 $110,900 $266,935 95% The low bidder was determined based on the total bid amount. The Engineer s Estimate for the base bid was $130,375 and $99,475 for the additive alternates, for a total amount of $229,850. Abide Builders was determined to be non-responsive due to not meeting the contractor s license requirements set forth in bid documents. Pursuant to City Code Sections 3.60.020 and 3.60.360 E, it was determined that Olympic Land Construction offered the lowest responsive bid, (based on the base bid plus the additive alternate) and is a responsible bidder. The contract will be awarded for the base bid and the additive alternate in the amount of $266,935. Financial Considerations: There are adequate resources in the Park Development Impact Fees (Fund 3204) available fund balance to appropriate funding to the project as listed below: Project Name Project Number Fund Amount Measure U Park Improvements L19706000 Park Development Impact $175,000 Fees (Fund 3204) City of Sacramento March 20, 2018 powered by Legistar Page 3 of 87

File ID: 2018-00196 Consent Item 14 The total estimated project cost is $266,935. Additional funding of $175,000 is necessary to complete the project. This is an existing park; the annual maintenance and utilities costs are covered in the Department of Parks and Recreation s operating budget for maintenance, water, and utility costs. Local Business Enterprise (LBE): At an LBE percentage of 95%, Olympic Land Construction exceeded the 5% LBE participation requirement. City of Sacramento March 20, 2018 powered by Legistar Page 4 of 87

Page 5 of 87

Documents and in no way affect or limit the interpretation of the provisions to which they refer. 2. DEFINITIONS Unless otherwise specifically provided herein, all words and phrases defined in the Standard Specifications shall have the same meaning and intent in this Agreement. 3. AGREEMENT CONTROLS In the event of a conflict between any of the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement and the terms and conditions set forth in other Contract Documents, the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement shall prevail, except that the provisions of any duly authorized change order shall prevail over any conflicting provisions of this Agreement. 4. SCOPE OF CONTRACT Contractor agrees to furnish all tools, equipment, apparatus, facilities, labor, material and transportation necessary to perform and complete in a good and workmanlike manner to the satisfaction of City, all the Work called for in the Contract Documents entitled: MU-Fort Natomas Shade Structure (PN: L19706030) Bid #B181911219 Including the Work called for in the following alternative bid items described in the Proposal Form: A1-Swing Shade Canopies Contractor agrees to perform such Work in the manner designated in and in strict conformity with the Contract Documents. 5. CONTRACT AMOUNT AND PAYMENTS City agrees to pay and Contractor agrees to accept, as complete payment for the above Work, in accordance with the schedule and procedures set forth in the Contract Documents and subject to deductions, withholdings and additions as specified in the Contract Documents, a total sum that shall not exceed the total bid amount set forth in Contractor s Proposal Form. In addition, subject to deductions, withholdings and additions as specified in the Contract Documents, payment for individual items of the Work shall be computed as follows: A. For items of the Work for which a lump sum price is specified in Contractor s Proposal Form, Contractor shall be paid the lump sum price(s) specified in Contractor s Proposal Form; and Form approved by City Attorney 1-11-17 2 Page 6 of 87

Page 7 of 87

Page 8 of 87

Page 9 of 87

Page 10 of 87

Page 11 of 87

Page 12 of 87

Page 13 of 87

Page 14 of 87

Page 15 of 87

Page 16 of 87

Page 17 of 87

Page 18 of 87

Page 19 of 87

Page 20 of 87

Page 21 of 87

Page 22 of 87

Page 23 of 87

Page 24 of 87

Page 25 of 87

Page 26 of 87

Page 27 of 87

Page 28 of 87

Page 29 of 87

Page 30 of 87

Page 31 of 87

Page 32 of 87

Page 33 of 87

Page 34 of 87

Page 35 of 87

Page 36 of 87

Page 37 of 87

Page 38 of 87

Page 39 of 87

Page 40 of 87

Page 41 of 87

Page 42 of 87

Page 43 of 87

Page 44 of 87

Page 45 of 87

Page 46 of 87

Page 47 of 87

Page 48 of 87

Page 49 of 87

Page 50 of 87

Page 51 of 87

Page 52 of 87

Page 53 of 87

Page 54 of 87

Page 55 of 87

Page 56 of 87

Page 57 of 87

Page 58 of 87

Page 59 of 87

Page 60 of 87

Page 61 of 87

Page 62 of 87

Page 63 of 87

Page 64 of 87

Page 65 of 87

Page 66 of 87

Page 67 of 87

Page 68 of 87

Page 69 of 87

Page 70 of 87

Page 71 of 87

Page 72 of 87

Page 73 of 87

Page 74 of 87

Page 75 of 87

Page 76 of 87

Page 77 of 87

Page 78 of 87

Page 79 of 87

Page 80 of 87

Page 81 of 87

Page 82 of 87

Page 83 of 87

Page 84 of 87

Page 85 of 87

Page 86 of 87

RESOLUTION NO. 2018- Adopted by the Sacramento City Council APPROPRIATE FUNDING FOR MEASURE U Park Improvements (L19706000) Fort Natomas Shade Structure BACKGROUND A. Fort Natomas is a play structure located within South Natomas Community Park. The community park is 25.11 acres and located at 2901 Truxel Road in South Natomas (Council District 3). B. The Department of Youth, Parks, & Community Enrichment is seeking appropriation of an additional $175,000 from Park Development Impact Fees (Fund 3204) available fund balance to the Fort Natomas Shade Structure Project, a sub project of Measure U Park Improvements (L19706000). The additional funding is necessary to cover the construction and staff costs for the project. The project consists of installation of a 7 fabric shade structures and Minor repairs to playground and surfacing. Council Resolution 2017-0246, Section 4.1 requires that all appropriation changes (increases or decreases) in excess of $100,000 to the Approved Budget shall be approved by resolution of the City Council. BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 2. Section 3. Section 4. The construction plans and specifications for the Fort Natomas Shade Structure, a sub-project to Measure U Park Improvements (L19706000) are approved. The contract to Olympic Land Construction for $266,935 is approved. The City Manager or City Manager s designee is authorized to execute the contract. Appropriation of $175,000 from the Park Development Impact Fees (Fund 3204) available fund balance to the Fort Natomas Shade Structure Project, a sub-project of Measure U Park Improvements (L19706000) is approved. Page 87 of 87