Forms & Score Sheets

Similar documents
Forms & Score Sheets

Benchmarking Intelligent Service Robots through Scientific Competitions: the approach. Luca Iocchi. Sapienza University of Rome, Italy

Benchmarking Intelligent Service Robots through Scientific Competitions. Luca Iocchi. Sapienza University of Rome, Italy

Rules & Regulations. Version: 2009 Revision: 127 Last Build Date: January 21, 2009 Time: 598

CoSpace Make Code Challenge Rules 2016

TEST PROJECT MOBILE ROBOTICS FOR JUNIOR

Competition Arena Rules Revised March 21, 2017

On past, present and future of a scientific competition for service robots

RoboCupJunior CoSpace Rescue Rules 2015

Rules & Regulations. Version: 2016 Rev-404 Last Build Date: May 5, 2016 Time: 933 Last Revision Date:

Line Follower Enhanced Regulations

Robotics Contest Contact: Robin Schamber

LEGO BASED CHALLENGE. 1. Material

COMPETITION RULES. Last Revised: January 11 th, Table of Contents

Sample Test Project Regional Skill Competitions Level 3 Skill 23 - Mobile Robotics Category: Manufacturing & Engineering Technology

WRS Partner Robot Challenge (Virtual Space) is the World's first competition played under the cyber-physical environment.

LINE FOLLOWING RULES. Priit Norak

TrainSpeed1. Single train speed indicator. Model Railroad Speedometer Operating Manual

Version 1.1 February 7th, Beach Cleaner Robot

TrainSpeed 4. Four separate train speed indicators. Model Railroad Speedometer Operating Manual

Scenarios will NOT be announced beforehand. Any scenario from the Clash of Kings 2018 book as well as CUSTOM SCENARIOS is fair game.

CLASSIFICATION CONTROL WIDTH LENGTH

World Robot Olympiad 2018

IEEE PSU Student Chapter Robotics Competition 2014/2015

1 Abstract and Motivation

Autonomous Aerial Robot Tournament KISS Institute for Practical Robotics

Ninth Annual SLIIT. Robotic Competition. Open UAV Race Competition Technical Specification. Organized By

WORLD ROBOT OLYMPIAD Advanced Robotics Challenge Game Description, Rules and Scoring SMART GREENHOUSE

Table of Contents FIRST 2005 FIRST Robotics Competition Manual: Section 4 The Game rev C Page 1 of 17

Sumo-bot Competition Rules

Partner Robot Challenge Real Space

3sec. 10 min. Incomparable Efficiency. Bilateral. The More Strengths VH Measure = 3 Values at Once. Choose Bilateral or Single!

Basics for Operators. Making the Most Profit out of your. Shelti RD & Radikal Darts

IEEE Open Milker Robot Version 1.1

SKILL DEMONSTRATION EVENT Interior Design Sketch

Mini Sumo and Lego Sumo rules 2018

IEEE-INTERNATIONAL ADVANCED ROBOTICS COMPETITION Rulebook Rev 3.0

Rules & Regulation. COUNTER STRIKE GLOBAL OFFENSIVE (1v1)

Organised by: Science Buskers Festival 2017

Scientific Competition and Benchmarking for Domestic Service Robots

Team Update 14. General Notes

MATERIALS PROVIDED BY SCIENCE & TECH FAIR STAFF AT EVENT:

Robots in Town Autonomous Challenge. Overview. Challenge. Activity. Difficulty. Materials Needed. Class Time. Grade Level. Objectives.

BodyKey App 2.0 User Guide (AMWAY -Organised and Self-Organised Challenge)

CONFUSION LLC TOTAL CONFUSION LLC GAME CONVENTION. February 22-25, 2018 Best Western Marlborough, Massachusetts

Fire Fighting. Objective. Robot. Fire Fighting. Name of Event: Robots per Team: 1

Students will design, program, and build a robot vehicle to traverse a maze in 30 seconds without touching any sidewalls or going out of bounds.

RCAP CoSpace Rescue Rules 2017

DC Tournament RULES June 2017 v1.1

REGULATIONS «LEGO SUMO»

RoboCupJunior Rescue B Rules 2012

Overall approach, including resources required. Session Goals

Service-Robots as Daily Helpers

Code Hunting Games CodeWeek2018

JScore. Electronic Judo Scoreboard System Coventry Judo Club. Tony Hughes. 1 Jscore Coventry Judo Club

Robotic Applications Industrial/logistics/medical robots

CoSpace OnStage Rules 2017

«RELAY RACE» CONTEST RULES

2019 PP of Iowa Official Print Competition Rules PLEASE READ AS NEW CHANGES ARE IN EFFECT!! Instructions for All Entrants

RoboCupJunior Rescue Simulation(CoSpace) 2018

Rules & Regulations RAINBOW SIX SIEGE

Morse Code Autonomous Challenge. Overview. Challenge. Activity. Difficulty. Materials Needed. Class Time. Grade Level. Learning Focus.

Utah Elementary Robotics Obstacle Course Rules USU Physics Day. Competition at USU Brigham City Campus 989 S Main St Brigham City, UT 84302

GST BOCES. Regional Robotics Competition & Exhibition. May 29, :00 2:00. Wings of Eagles Discovery Center, Big Flats NY. Mission Mars Rover

Advanced Robotics Introduction

ODYSSEY OF THE MIND Problem No. 2: Teach Yer Creature. Copyright 2008, Creative Competitions, Inc.

Advanced Robotics Introduction

GAME DESCRIPTION HOT SLOTS V6.00 COPY. (c) 2002 Version 6.00 Belgium

2012 Alabama Robotics Competition Challenge Descriptions

Sample Test Project District / Zonal Skill Competitions Skill- Mobile Robotic Category: Manufacturing & Engineering Technology

2016 STEM Survival Competition. November 5, 2016 Hosted by: Wilkinson County Christian Academy

Division Age Category Number of Participants Open 55+ Two (2)

RoboCup Rescue Rulebook

Keywords: Multi-robot adversarial environments, real-time autonomous robots

National Robotics Competition 2007

Mobile Robot Navigation Contest for Undergraduate Design and K-12 Outreach

Q&A. VRC : Turning Point. Tagged: G12

IMAV 2015 Micro Aerial Vehicles Competition Competition Rules

RoboCup Rescue - Robot League League Talk. Johannes Pellenz RoboCup Rescue Exec

An External Command Reading White line Follower Robot

RoboCupJunior Rescue B Rules 2013

Advertising & Media Sponsorship Pack

Mystery Dining Mission earls Lounge

2017 National Youth and Junior U20 Chess Championships. Table of Contents

2018 First Responders 4-H Robotics Challenge Page 1

Lab book. Exploring Robotics (CORC3303)

Lowell National Historical Park 38 th Annual Banjo & Fiddle Contest

Mantic Kings of War Adepticon Tournament Rules 2014

Original instructions Installation guide

Inspiring Creative Fun Ysbrydoledig Creadigol Hwyl. Kinect2Scratch Workbook

Tekken 7. General Rules

1.5 How are the games in the tournament rated?

MazeBot. Our Urban City. Challenge Manual

SUMO RULES. Allar Aasjõe

LINE FOLLOWER ROBOT CATEGORY RULES 1) Objective

OZOBLOCKLY BASIC TRAINING LESSON 1 SHAPE TRACER 1

FTC Block Party CS2N Mode Fall 2013

Robotic Conquest 1453 CONTEST TERMS AND CONDITIONS

MAVeC 19 Autobot Challenge

Catalog

Transcription:

RoboCup@Home Forms & s Version: 2011 Revision: 286:288 Last Build Date: June 13, 2012 Time: 896 Last Changed Date: 2012-06-04 14:41:02 +0200 (Mon, 04 Jun 2012)

Registration Form Team leader name: Weight & dimensions (robot 1): Weight & dimensions (robot 2): External devices: Safety first! The speed of the robots should ensure safe operation. This means that the robot is not allowed to go faster than the local speed limits. During operation in an environment with humans it may not exceed a walking pace of humans (6 kph, 3.7 mph). At any time when operating the robot inside and outside the scenario the owners have to stop the robot immediately if there is a remote possibility of dangerous behavior towards people and/or objects. If a referee, member of the Technical or Organizational committee, an Executive or Trustee of the federation tells the team to stop the robot, there will be no discussion and the robot has to be stopped immediately. If the team does not comply, the team and its members can be excluded from the ongoing competition immediately by a decision of the RoboCup@Home Technical Committee. Furthermore, the team and its members can be banned from future competitions for a period not less than a year by a decision of the RoboCup Federation Trustee Board. I have read and fully understood the Safety First statement and agree to it. Furthermore, I agree to obey the rules in the official RoboCup@Home rulebook. Date & time Team leader

Robot Inspection The maximum time for this test is 5 minutes. Action Score 1st try 2nd try Registration (up to pressing emergency button) Autonomous registration (one robot) 400 Autonomous registration (two robots) 2 200 Leaving the arena (after releasing the emergency button) Autonomously leaving (one robot) 100 Autonomously leaving (two robots) 2 50 Neat Appearance No wires hanging out of the robot, e.g., no functional wire has to be tied to the robot, no duct-tape, internals covered, etc. 200 Poster session Arithmetic mean of scoring from evaluation sheets 30 300 Special penalties & bonuses Not attending -500 Outstanding performance 100 Total score 1000 Inspection: Item Robot 1 Robot 2 Emergency button Start button Speaker plug Appearance OK Passed

Poster Session Instructions: 1. Please watch all presentations carefully. 2. In addition, have a thorough view on all posters. 3. At the end of the presentation you may ask questions. 4. After presentation and questions, please fill in the evaluation sheet below. 5. Is not allowed to evaluate your own team. 6. You may use the space below to take notes for yourself. 7. Enter your team s name ( Team name ) and your name ( referee name ) on top of the sheet. 8. Sign the form using either Referee or Team leader slots at the bottom. Evaluation sheet Team CAMBADA@Home Donaxi@Home Dong Yang er@sers Golem homer@unikoblenz Markovito MRL NimbRo@Home Pumas RoboSiam@Home SKUBA Tech United ToBI (Team of Bielefeld) UChile HomeBreakers WrightEagle@Home ZJUPanda Quality of appearance Quality of poster Scientific Poster presentation of poster (0-10) content (0-10) value (0-10) and questions (0-10)

Follow me The maximum time of the test is 8 minutes. Action Score 1st try 2nd try Points for the three sections for the best time t 1 achieved in section 1, less points are given for longer times (see Normalization) for the best time t 2 achieved in section 2, less points are given for longer times (see Normalization) for the best time t 3 achieved in section 3, less points are given for longer times (see Normalization) 300 300 300 Additional points completing the full task 100 Special penalties & bonuses Not attending -500 Outstanding performance 100 Total score 1000 Scoring remarks: The score is based on the (accumulated) time taken at each ITP (intermediate time point) and at the final goal point (e.g. t 1 = 125sec, t 2 = 305sec, t 3 = 425sec). Then the time intervals needed for each section are computed (e.g. t 1 = 125sec, t 2 = 180sec, t 3 = 120sec). The scores are then normalized with regard to the best time interval achieved for this section (e.g. t min 1 = 100sec, t min 2 = 90sec, t min 3 = 120sec). In the example a complete score of 240 + 150 + 300 + 100 = 790 points is achieved: Normalization: computed by If a team needs more time in a section than the best team, the score for that section i is reduced score for section i: 300 ( t min i / t i ) where t 1 = t 1 0, t 2 = t 2 t 1, t 3 = t 3 t 2 t min 1, t min 2, t min 3 are the minimum time intervals achieved by a team.

Clean up The maximum time for this test is 8 minutes. Action Score 1st try 2nd try Penalties involved per object grasped and placed Successfully grasping and placing an object 1000 Placing an object at the wrong location -600 Penalty for hand over instead of autonomous grasping -400 Penalty for hand over instead of autonomous placing -200 Additional penalties Indicating wrong information when asking for help. -100 Special penalties & bonuses Not attending -500 Using start button -100 Outstanding performance 100 Total score 1000 Normalization: If a team achieves more than 1000 points (without outstanding performance), the scores of all teams are normalized. That is, the team with maximally achieved score gets 1000 points, the other teams accordingly less.

Who is who The maximum time for this test is 10 minutes. Action Score 1st try 2nd try Receive guests Understanding name 3 25 Using onboard microphone 3 75 Taking the order Finding the calling person and asking it for its order 200 Asking the wrong person or something that is not a person -150 Correctly understanding (and repeating) the order 150 Grasping drinks Grasping a drink (and successfully lifting it up to at least 5 cm for more than 10 seconds) 3 200 Delivering drinks Delivering the correct ordered drink to a standing person 2 200 Delivering the correct ordered drink to the sitting person 250 Leaving the arena Autonomously leaving the arena within the time limit 100 Penalties Talking to the wrong person (using wrong name) -50 Talking to something that is not a person -150 Special penalties & bonuses Not attending -500 Using start button -100 Outstanding performance 200 Total score 2000

Open challenge Instructions: 1. Please watch all demonstrations carefully. 2. At the end of the demonstration you may ask questions. 3. After demonstration and questions, please fill in the evaluation sheet below. 4. Is not allowed to evaluate your own team. 5. You may use the space below to take notes for yourself. 6. Enter your team s name ( Team name ) and your name ( referee name ) on top of the sheet. 7. Sign the form using either Referee or Team leader slots at the bottom. Evaluation sheet Team CAMBADA@Home Donaxi@Home Dong Yang er@sers Golem homer@unikoblenz Markovito MRL NimbRo@Home Pumas RoboSiam@Home SKUBA Tech United ToBI (Team of Bielefeld) UChile HomeBreakers WrightEagle@Home ZJUPanda Overall H-R-I Robot Usefulness Novelty/Scientific Difficulty & demo Autonomy for daily life contribution Success (0-10) (0-10) (0-10) (0-10) (0-10) (0-10)

General Purpose Service Robot The maximum time for this test is 10 minutes. Command I Category I Category II Category III Score item DO CO Score item DO CO Score item DO CO 1/3 Task 200 100 Questions 300 150 Task 300 150 2/3 Task 200 100 1/2 Task 300 150 Indicating 200 100 3/3 Task 200 100 2/2 Task 300 150 Explaining 300 150 Alternative 200 100 Total Total Total Command 2 1/3 Task 200 100 Questions 300 150 Task 300 150 2/3 Task 200 100 1/2 Task 300 150 Indicating 200 100 3/3 Task 200 100 2/2 Task 300 150 Explaining 300 150 Alternative 200 100 Total Total Total Command 3 1/3 Task 200 100 Questions 300 150 Task 300 150 2/3 Task 200 100 1/2 Task 300 150 Indicating 200 100 3/3 Task 200 100 2/2 Task 300 150 Explaining 300 150 Alternative 200 100 Total Total Total Max/Category DO = default operator (refereeing TC members), CO = custom operator (chosen by the team) Action Score 1st try 2nd try Command categories Maximum for Category I 600 Maximum for Category I 900 Maximum for Category I 1000 Special penalties & bonuses Not attending -500 Using start button -100 Outstanding performance 250 Total score 2500

Restaurant The maximum time for this test is 10 minutes. Action Score 1st try 2nd try Guide Phase Reaching a location in the guide phase 5 50 Navigation Phase Reaching a (task-relevant) location in the manipulation phase 4 100 Grasping the correct objects Successfully grasping a correct object from a shelf 3 250 Delivering the correct objects Successfully delivering the correct object to the correct location 3 200 Special penalties & bonuses Not attending -500 Outstanding performance 200 Total score 2000

Demo challenge Instructions: 1. Please watch all demonstrations carefully. 2. At the end of the demonstration you may ask questions. 3. After demonstration and questions, please fill in the evaluation sheet below. 4. Is not allowed to evaluate your own team. 5. You may use the space below to take notes for yourself. 6. Enter your team s name ( Team name ) and your name ( referee name ) on top of the sheet. 7. Sign the form using either Referee or Team leader slots at the bottom. Evaluation sheet Team CAMBADA@Home Donaxi@Home Dong Yang er@sers Golem homer@unikoblenz Markovito MRL NimbRo@Home Pumas RoboSiam@Home SKUBA Tech United ToBI (Team of Bielefeld) UChile HomeBreakers WrightEagle@Home ZJUPanda Overall H-R-I Robot Usefulness Novelty/Scientific Difficulty & demo Autonomy for daily life contribution Success (0-10) (0-10) (0-10) (0-10) (0-10) (0-10) Actual criteria (as in the rulebook) complexity of the task and performance, marketability/story, safety, and human-robot-interaction/usability/appearance Up to 1500 points, plus up to 500 for interaction (with the robot of another team).

Final Demonstration Jury Evaluation Instructions: 1. Please watch all demonstrations carefully. 2. At the end of the demonstration you may ask questions. 3. After demonstration and questions, please fill in the evaluation sheet below. 4. You may use the space below to take notes for yourself. 5. Enter your your name ( referee name ) on top of the sheet. 6. Sign the form using the Referee slot at the bottom. Evaluation sheet Team CAMBADA@Home Donaxi@Home Dong Yang er@sers Golem homer@unikoblenz Markovito MRL NimbRo@Home Pumas RoboSiam@Home SKUBA Tech United ToBI (Team of Bielefeld) UChile HomeBreakers WrightEagle@Home ZJUPanda Originality and Usability / Human- Usefulness Difficulty presentation Robot Interaction for daily life & Success (0-10) (0-10) (0-10) (0-10) Story telling is to be rewarded

Final Demonstration Executive Committee Instructions: 1. Please watch all demonstrations carefully. 2. At the end of the demonstration you may ask questions. 3. After demonstration and questions, please fill in the evaluation sheet below. 4. You may use the space below to take notes for yourself. 5. Enter your your name ( referee name ) on top of the sheet. 6. Sign the form using the Referee slot at the bottom. Criteria: Scientific contribution Contribution to @Home Relevance for @Home / Novelty of approaches Presentation and performance in the finals Evaluation sheet Team CAMBADA@Home Donaxi@Home Dong Yang er@sers Golem homer@unikoblenz Markovito MRL NimbRo@Home Pumas RoboSiam@Home SKUBA Tech United ToBI (Team of Bielefeld) UChile HomeBreakers WrightEagle@Home ZJUPanda Scientific Contribution Relevance for @Home/ Presentation & contribution to @Home Novelty of approaches Performance (demo) (0-10) (0-10) (0-10) (0-10)