CASI-F: a common framework for the assessment and management of sustainable innovation

Similar documents
Introducing Foresight Alliance

How to assess and manage sustainable innovations in the growing CE paradigm?

SPARC. Connect Innova,ons to Markets THE ROBOTICS PPP. DGE, Paris, 23 June Chris Bourillon Secretary General eurobo5cs

Table G Regional Aspects of Knowledge Economy. Seven habits of highly effective regions

Service Design, Social Innovation and Public sector innovation!

New employment opportuni/es in the context of digitaliza/on: The case of Greece ARTEMIS SAITAKIS DIRECTOR, SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY PARK OF CRETE

EU- US Industry and Academic Co- opera7on on Smart Ci7es. Haydn Thompson THHINK Group

GOLEM Integrated Microelectronics Solutions GmbH Serguei Golovanov, PhD, Dipl.Eng

Project overview Athens, 14 October 2016

MILAN DECLARATION Joining Forces for Investment in the Future of Europe

Please send your responses by to: This consultation closes on Friday, 8 April 2016.

L2: Needs iden+fica+on

Social Innovation 2015: Pathways to Social Change Vienna, November 18 th, Maria Schwarz-Woelzl (ZSI) & Wolfgang Haider (ZSI)

Horizon 2020 Towards a Common Strategic Framework for EU Research and Innovation Funding

Research Goal 22/03/17. BERGAMO2035_A NEW URBAN CONCEPT. A model for mid-size european cities. Fulvio Adobati Sergio Cavalieri Matteo Kalchschmidt

THE ROLE OF TRANSPORT TECHNOLOGY PLATFORMS IN FOSTERING EXPLOITATION. Josef Mikulík Transport Research Centre - CDV

Europäischer Forschungsraum und Foresight

Social Innovation and new pathways to social changefirst insights from the global mapping

Foresight for policy-making

Conclusions concerning various issues related to the development of the European Research Area

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT STRATEGY FOR EUROPEAN TECHNOLOGY PLATFORMS: ETP 2020

COST FP9 Position Paper

Robotics: from FP7 to Horizon Libor Král, Head of Unit Unit A2 - Robotics DG Communication Networks, Content and Technology European Commission

10246/10 EV/ek 1 DG C II

Written response to the public consultation on the European Commission Green Paper: From

demonstrator approach real market conditions would be useful to provide a unified partner search instrument for the CIP programme

Consultancy on Technological Foresight

Melanie Agnew, University of Wisconsin, U.S.A. Rhonda Friesen, University of Manitoba, Canada Douglas Proctor, University of Melbourne, Australia

From FP7 towards Horizon 2020 Workshop on " Research performance measurement and the impact of innovation in Europe" IPERF, Luxembourg, 31/10/2013

BYTE: 4 th GEOSS Science &Technology Stakeholder Workshop Norfolk (VA), USA March Lorenzo Bigagli

SMART CITIES Presentation

Raw materials topics in Horizon 2020 Societal Challenge 5 Work Programme 2016

European Coordination for Coastal HF Radar: EuroGOOS HF Radar Task Team

Strengthening sustainable innovation policy with CASI tools

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 9 December 2008 (16.12) (OR. fr) 16767/08 RECH 410 COMPET 550

Integrated Transformational and Open City Governance Rome May

The New Song for Coastal Fisheries pathways to change. MJ Amos, FAME, SPC

Mul6lingual Linked Data Technologies for the Single Digital Market

FP9 s ambitious aims for societal impact call for a step change in interdisciplinarity and citizen engagement.

Non-ferrous metals manufacturing industry: vision for the future and actions needed

HORIZON Presentation at Manufuture Perspectives on Industrial Technologies in Horizon 2020 and Beyond

EuropeAid. Sustainable and Cleaner Production in the Manufacturing Industries of Pakistan (SCI-Pak)

Thinking. Design. Principles of. Thinking Like a Designer From Idea to Business

HORIZON Leadership in Enabling and Industrial Technologies (LEIT)

Workshop on Enabling Technologies in CSF for EU Research and Innovation Funding

Research Infrastructures and Innovation

CAPACITIES. 7FRDP Specific Programme ECTRI INPUT. 14 June REPORT ECTRI number

Inclusively Creative

Chapter 11 Cooperation, Promotion and Enhancement of Trade Relations

Mainstreaming PE in Horizon 2020: perspectives and ambitions

SCAR response to the 2 nd Foresight Expert Group Report

International Cooperation in Horizon 2020

Horizon 2020 R&I Opportuni2es

Project presentation Lampros Stegioulas. NEM General Assembly, Brussels 1 April 2014

Economic and Social Council

TENTATIVE REFLECTIONS ON A FRAMEWORK FOR STI POLICY ROADMAPS FOR THE SDGS

Roadmap for European Universities in Energy December 2016

Framework Programme 7

H2020 Theme Oriented Training on ICT. H2020 Overview. Thies Wittig. Deputy Team Leader Project "Turkey in Horizon 2020"

Innovation Management & Technology Transfer Innovation Management & Technology Transfer

Blue NET Mari%me Clusters Network for Blue Growth EASME/EMFF/2015/ /01/SI

David Calder

Strengthening the knowledge base and reducing fragmentation

Principles for Responsible Innovation. Building trust and trustworthiness in business innova3on. Consulta)on Dra-


Table of Contents. In the examinaon of the portfolio theory, the. The successful posioning of a brand implies at. Articles.

Committee on Industry, Research and Energy WORKING DOCUMENT. on Innovation Union: Transforming Europe for a post-crisis world

Engaging Stakeholders

European Associa.on for Biometrics

Conclusions on the future of information and communication technologies research, innovation and infrastructures

DG GROW - Internal Market, Industry Entrepreneurship and SMEs GROW/I1 - Space Policy and Research Unit

ClusterNanoRoad

BalticSatApps. Speeding up Copernicus Innovation for the BSR Environment and Security

Torsti Loikkanen, Principal Scientist, Research Coordinator VTT Innovation Studies

Terms of Reference. Call for Experts in the field of Foresight and ICT

Comunicare la Resilienza ed I Cambiamen8 Clima8ci. Piero Pelizzaro, Kyoto Club

Taking poli+cal objec+ves seriously when analyzing innova+on policy tools The case of Russia

Skoltech Accelera-ng Innova-on

Stakeholders Acting Together On the ethical impact assessment of Research and Innovation

Working together to deliver on Europe 2020

HORIZON The New EU Framework Programme for Dr. Helge Wessel DG Research and Innovation. Research and Innovation

Scoping Paper for. Horizon 2020 work programme Leadership in Enabling and Industrial Technologies Space

Tools of strategic governance of industrial innovation: Smart specialisation. 24 October, ECRN Jan Larosse

WP 10 Communication and Dissemination Milestone MS20 Communication Strategy Version 1.0

Smart Specialisation Strategies methodology and the role of SMEs

II. The mandates, activities and outputs of the Technology Executive Committee

STATE ADVANCED MANUFACTURING POLICIES AND PROGRAMS. As at February 2018

Burgundy : Towards a RIS3

Using foresight techniques in the implementation of innovation policies

Developing Smart Specialisation through Targeted Support

UN GA TECHNOLOGY DIALOGUES, APRIL JUNE

Horizon Work Programme Leadership in enabling and industrial technologies - Introduction

Innova&on in crea&ve clusters. Yosha Wijngaarden

Digital Innovation Hubs & Smart Specialisation

Globalisation increasingly affects how companies in OECD countries

Technology Platforms: champions to leverage knowledge for growth

Engaging UK Climate Service Providers a series of workshops in November 2014

Citizens' Observatories & Crowdsourcing Novel ways to engage citizens in science and environmental policy-making

For a Sustainable Future History Matters

HORIZON 2020 The new Framework Programme for Research and Innovation

Transcription:

CASI-F: a common framework for the assessment and management of sustainable innovation Rafael Popper & Guillermo Velasco Manchester Institute of Innovation Research, The University of Manchester

Outline Part 1 The triple-track approach/sources Part 2 Data mapping: Exploring CASIPEDIA and the CASI Library Part 3 Critical issues identification and actions generation Part 4 Further steps in CASI-F: Piloting and applications

The triple-track approach/sources

Why a Triple Track approach? Good Governance Principles (EC, 2001) Track 1 Ini3a3ves Track 2 Ci3zen panels Track 3 Policies Openness Sharing a wide range of SI ini>a>ves through CASIPEDIA Sharing some 50 ci>zen SI visions through the Visions Catalogue Facilita>ng access to policy insights and policy blogs Par>cipa>on Engaging with key stakeholders, innovators and experts Elici>ng desirable futures from civil society actors Promo>ng policy debates through the CASI Policy Blog Accountability Dynamic assessment and tracking of SI prac>ces Assessing research priori>es alignment with ci>zen visions Dissemina>ng EU/na>onal SI policy developments Effec>veness Genera>ng SI ac>ons from systema>c analysis of SI ini>a>ves Transla>ng ci>zen visions into research priori>es Suppor>ng evidence- based policy advice Coherence Co- producing advice at strategic, programming and opera>onal levels Iden>fying economic, social and environmental benefits of visions Aligning advice with exis>ng and emerging policy goals

Triple Track Approach to SI Management Track 1 SI ini3a3ves Track 2 Ci3zen panels Track 3 Policies Step 1: Mapping Intelligence 1.0 (Informa3on) Nomina3on of 545 SI cases Selec3on of 193 SI cases Mapping 193 cases: prac>ces, players, outcomes Ci3zens visions elicita>on 50 Visions from 12 EU countries Policy briefs Policy blogs Step 2: Analysis Intelligence 2.0 (Ideas) Mul3- source CASI analysis: 60 cri>cal considera>ons for SI management Induc3ve analysis of 193 SI cases: dimensions (4), aspects (10), cri>cal issues (50) Visions outreach and transforma>on analysis: strategic level analysis Iden>fica>on of chances, alarms, sugges>ons and inten>ons: programming level analysis Iden>fica>on of policy insights, gaps and ac>ons implica3ons Step 3: Advice Intelligence 3.0 (Ac3ons) Meta- ac3ons from SI common considera>ons Case- related ac3ons from piloted SI cases, based on cri>cal issues Research priori3es and ac>ons based on chances, alarms, inten>ons, sugges>ons (experts panels + ci>zens acknowledgement sessions) Policy recommended ac3ons, based on formulated/ suggested policies

Data mapping: Exploring CASIPEDIA and the CASI Library

CASIPEDIA

CASIPEDIA Filters (1/3)

CASIPEDIA Filters (2/3)

CASIPEDIA Filters (3/3)

Mapping SI initiatives (1/7) SI Practices 1. SI Name 2. SI Description 3. SI URL 4. Lead organisation 5. Lead organisation URL 6. SI Scope 7. SI Date range 8. Link to H2020 priorities 9. SI Type 10. SI Objectives 11. SI Origins 12. SI Factors of success 13. SI Drivers 14. SI Tensions 15. Funding/market potential 16. Mobilisation degree 17. Mutual learning processes 18. SI transferability 19. Similar SI elsewhere 20. SI assessment methods SI Outcomes 1. SWOT 2. Policies 3. Spin-offs 4. Publications 5. Skills and competences 6. Transformations Economic Systems Infrastructure Systems Government Systems Social Systems Individual Dev. Systems Environ. & Resource Systems SI players 1. Innovators 2. Funders/Sponsors 3. Supporters/Brokers 4. Beneficiaries/Users

Mapping SI initiatives (2/7)

Mapping SI initiatives (3/7)

Mapping SI initiatives (4/7)

Mapping SI initiatives (5/7)

Mapping SI initiatives (6/7)

Mapping SI initiatives (7/7)

CASI Ideas Bank barrier driver idea opportunity threat

CASI Library

CASI Policy Blog

Critical issues identification and actions generation

What type of actions? Top- level Management: Strategic ac3ons Involves the defini.on of orienta.on objec.ves and the ways in which the strategies will work towards the achievement of such objec.ves. Mid- level Management: Programming/Tac3cal ac3ons Involves the transla.on of the objec.ves stated by the strategic level into tac.cal interven.ons implemen.ng specific thema.c SI priori.es. Front- line Management: Opera3onal ac3ons Responsibility of SI front- line managers (government, firms, civil society, researcher and educa.on actors): knowledge produc.on, SI opera.ons and management, network coordina.on. Adapted from : Barre, R., Henriques, L., Pon>kakis, D., Weber K. M. (2013) Measuring the integra>on and coordina>on dynamics of the European Research Area. Science and Public Policy, 40 (2), 187-205,

1 st Track: SI Initiatives

Step 1: Mapping WAI initiative (WASTE S ALCHEMY IBÉRICA, S.L.) Process and equipment for the recovery of rejec>on frac>ons of non- hazardous waste

Step 1: Mapping WAI initiative (WASTE S ALCHEMY IBÉRICA, S.L.) Waste s Alchemy Ibérica S.L. (WAI) is a small company located in Spain and dedicated to scien>fic and technological developments in the waste- to- energy sector. The ideas developed by this company seek to provide solu>ons to the waste management problems, focusing on the processes that may transform residues into alterna3ve ecologic materials and fuel. WAI is developing an innova>ve alterna>ve for the treatment of waste rejected frac>ons, resul>ng in a new product with outstanding proper>es: high- energy content, uniform density, waterproof and a homogenous molecular structure that ensures valuable mechanical characteris>cs. This process has a bright future and business poten>al insomuch it cons>tutes a new and more efficient alterna>ve to exis>ng waste treatments. Furthermore, these par>cular characteris>cs make a real difference within the world of the solid recovered fuels, not to men>on the ecologic advantages over other contaminant fossil resources such as coal. This dual feature, along with its low energy consump>on, is considered one of the keys of this inven>on. Although this inven>on has an accepted patent applica>on, and the technology has been demonstrated with a prototype (according to the Technology Readiness Level scale, this technology is now situated in a TRL 7 level), more addi>onal adapta>ons and pilo>ng tests are needed at different scales and condi>ons, in order to reduce technology risks.

Step 2: WAI initiative s critical issues (WASTE S ALCHEMY IBÉRICA, S.L.) Enabling issues Target energy, waste, raw materials challenges simultaneously Different alternative markets: energy and ecomaterial Waste treatment services Very diverse sectors are potential users of this technology Inhibiting issues Weak international cooperation Waste handling requires logistics agreements Technology costs need to be reduced University and research commitment is needed

Step 3: Mapping actions linked to critical issues SI evidence: WAI (SP) STRATEGIC ACTIONS TACTICAL ACTIONS OPERATIONAL ACTIONS GOVERMENT BUSINESS CIVIL SOCIETY RESEARCH & EDU Facilitate tools for reinforcing SME's interna>onal network and interna>onalisa>on skills Barrier: They should reinforce the interna.onal network and the necessary skills for interna.onalisa.on) Develop technology data- sharing plakorms Increase staff's innova>on management skills and capabili>es Elaborate technology roadmaps Factor of success: The waste- transforma.on solu.on is en.rely based on mechanical and calorific processes) Deliver seminars on (sectoral) Feed an internal technology management at database with new regional level technologies iden>fied in trade/technology events, suppliers and users (open innova>on) Explore the poten>al implementa>on of SME's sustainable solu>ons on emerging countries (NGOs) Par3cipate as a partner in EC funded projects with local SMEs Organise monthly mee>ng with local SMEs so as to share collabora>on opportuni>es Strengthen the coopera>on of SME's with local Universi>es Promote the dissemina>on of SME's best prac>ces through shared courses and events (e.g. the week of "recovered residues") Edit brochures with local SMEs' informa>on and contact data

Step 3+a: Importance self-assessment

Step 3+b: Feasibility self-assessment

2 nd Track: SI Visions

Piloting the assessment of relevant SI visions Insects - the dish of the future (Fear: lack of food security) Insects the dish of the future Inspired by the fear of lack of food security and malnutri.on Replacing costly and oben inadequate diet with nutri3ous insects. Economic benefits Breeding and producing insect- based food may offer new job opportuni>es, while reducing imports of food and other related ac>vi>es Financial savings from reduced import of meat products Insects are easy to breed as they feed on debris and waste There are plenty of insects, which can be found throughout the planet and in any country Environmental benefits Breeding of insects does not produce CO2 as part of livestock produc>on and therefore do not contribute to global warming Achieving government emission target Decrease in meat produc>on and consump>on Social benefits Insects are healthy and contain large amounts of protein, while reducing the incidence of cardiovascular disease and other chronic condi>ons that are induced by red meat consump>on There are possibili>es of various modifica>ons such as the consump>on of insects in the form of nutri>onal cocktails, which are more visually amrac>ve People can capture, keep and cook insects themselves, thus being self- sufficient Protec>on and respect for animals; reducing animal cruelty What are possible nega3ve consequences of this vision? - Large number of insects needed to feed a person - Poten>al fear and uncertainty towards novel products - Low demand for meat products affec>ng meat produc>on sector and interna>onal trade Required policies - Promote standards and legisla>on for breeding and consump>on of insects in the EU - Develop regula>ons for the safe breeding and processing technologies - Develop effec>ve monitoring and quality control Required knowledge and skills - Marke>ng and familiariza>on with insect- based products and services - Thorough research on the impact of insects consump>on - A cookbook with amrac>ve recipes and images - Societal reassurance and cultural/behavioural change Required resources - Build a complete new infrastructure for breeding, storing, trading and consuming insects - Develop human resources, i.e. a new workforce dealing with the supply and demand of insect based products and services

Piloting the assessment of relevant SI visions Insects - the dish of the future (Fear: lack of food security) SI vision: Ci3zen Panel (CZ) STRATEGIC ACTIONS GOVERMENT BUSINESS CIVIL SOCIETY RESEARCH & EDU Develop legisla>ve advice for the breeding and consump>on of insects in Europe. Invest in marke>ng and capacity building ac>vi>es for human consump>on of insects. TACTICAL ACTIONS Provide financial incen>ves and facilitate the development of required technological infrastructure for insect trade in the food chain. Collaborate with other stakeholders interested in introducing the new insect- based products in the market. Disseminate outcomes of research ac>vi>es and train relevant stakeholders. OPERATIONAL ACTIONS Disseminate informa>on Develop safe insect on the safety and benefits breeding and of insects consump>on to processing gain trust of poten>al techniques and consumers. technologies. Collect or breed insects yourself. Conduct further research on the consump>on of insects.

3 rd Track: SI Policies

3 rd Track: Policies Policy briefs Policy blogs Iden>fica>on of cri>cal issues and content analysis Policy recommended ac>ons, based on formulated/ suggested policies

Can smart cities be sustainable innovation actors? CASI Policy brief 31.3.2014 CASI-PB-1.2014-EUROPE Ac>ons Most policy briefs focus on ac>ons for Government Actors

Piloting the assessment of relevant SI policy CAN SMART CITIES BE SUSTAINABLE INNOVATION ACTORS? CASI Policy brief 31.3.2014 CASI-PB-1.2014-EUROPE SI policy: Policy Brief (EU) STRATEGIC ACTIONS GOVERNANCE BUSINESS CIVIL SOCIETY RESEARCH & EDU Support partnerships that allow na>onal and regional stakeholders to step out of common network boundaries into strong interna>onal alliances. TACTICAL ACTIONS OPERATIONAL ACTIONS Share best prac>ces and proven experiences from successful ini>a>ves in smart ci>es. Set up indicators and monitor results to track progress in smart ci>es development. Not found in this Policy Brief

Further steps in CASI-F: Piloting and applications

Towards a SI Management Framework SI informa>on gathering Mapping CASIPEDIA analysis Nomina>on Selec>on Prac>ces Players Outcomes Cri>cal factors iden>fica>on CASI par>cipatory discussions Induc>ve approach to cri>cal issues (SI cases individual analysis) DIM 1 DIM 2 DIM 3 DIM 4 Aspect 1 Aspect 2 Aspect 3 Aspect 4 Aspect 5 Aspect 6 Aspect 7 Aspect 8 Aspect 9 Aspect 10 50 CRITICAL ISSUES Case- related ac>ons 60 Key findings from SI assessment Mul>- source CASI analysis Technological (11) Economic (12) Poli>cal (8) Social (14) Environmental (6) Ethical (5) Spa>al (4) Meta ac>ons

SI Management Dimension 1: Context CONTEXT The success of Sustainable Innova>on depends greatly on its context. Firstly, the momentum reflects a poten>al space for innova>on: the expecta3ons of entrepreneurs and other actors: the poli>cal drive from regulators or procurement: the exemplars from other ecological or social enterprises: and the percep>on of problems which call for solu>ons. Second, the cri>cal factors of foresight show the capacity to an>cipate, strategize, and get over gaps in the innova>on curve. Thirdly, resources show simply the necessary combina>ons of skills, finance, loca>on, markets etc. Fourthly, mobiliza3on is the capacity for ac>on, as in public par>cipa>on, community support, ins>tu>onal support, champions and facilitators, public- private partnerships, research and educa>on engagement. 1. MOMENTUM 2. FORESIGHT 3. RESOURCES 4. MOBILISATION Poli>cal serng Exemplars Problems Horizon scanning Strategic targets Trends Geographical serng Funding sources Infrastructure Data sources Scalability Public par>cipa>on Community support Ins>tu>onal support Champions and facilitators Public- Private Partnerships Research and educa>on engagement

SI Management Dimension 2: People PEOPLE The role of people actors, stakeholders, players, intermediaries etc, ac>ng as individuals, households, groups, firms, professions, communi>es or sectors cannot be under- es>mated. Many policy objec>ves are unfulfilled if they did not connect or mobilize the right people, or did not provide the right incen>ves and enabling factors. In parallel there is a focus of amen>on on the entrepreneur or leadership as one of the most cri>cal factor: However in a complex knowledge- based supply chain, or a complex social community with mul>ple needs, it seems that the vital quali>es of entrepreneurship or leadership are likely to be distributed, networked, risk- shared, and team- based. For sustainable SI (in contrast to mainstream innova>on) there may be a stronger case for such quali>es as emergent from the wider innova>on ecosystem, even while the tradi>onal heroic image con>nues of the lone innovator. This has implica>ons for SI- related innova>on policy, which may take a conven>onal MBA- type approach, or look more widely to the community in context. 5. APTITUDE 6. ATTITUDE Leadership Charisma Crea>vity Knowledge Enthusiasm Empathy Involvement Commitment

SI Management Dimension 3: Process PROCESS Innova>on is widely accepted to be a complex, par3cipatory and mul3faceted process. In par>cular, the analysis of CASIPEDIA confirms that a large number of actors and perspec>ves need to be considered in the study of innova>on projects. SI process assessment and analysis are based on the interpreta>on of many influencing factors and their poten>al combina3on. Given the varied possibili>es of clustering, and with the aim of simplifying, here the SI process factors is analysed from two perspec>ves: a catalyst aspects category, i.e. those factors that contribute to ac>vate and launch the innova>on, and a keeper aspects category, which includes those factors that make possible the con>nuity and consolida>on of SI ac>ons. 7. CATALYSTS 8. KEEPERS Comprehensibility Crowd- sourcing Learning by doing Suppor>ve services Absorp>ve capacity Ex ante impact evalua>on Pilo>ng and experimen>ng Incen>ves Coordina>on Networking and synergy Knowledge management Intellectual property management Ex post evalua>on and monitoring Communica>on and dissemina>on

SI Management Dimension 4: Impact IMPACT The impact of sustainable innova>on may be analysed from two different perspec>ves. On the one hand, we may focus on those system transforma3on- oriented or structural objec3ves whose fulfilment would indirectly suppose a posi>ve contribu>on to sustainability challenges, e.g. changes in lifestyle, ac>ons for economic growth, ini>a>ves to reinforce community- sense, entrepreneurship and knowledge- sharing strategies, among others. On the other hand, impacts may respond to narrower sustainability- problem- oriented ac>ons, thus the effect of sustainability ac>ons should be measured in terms of their social, economic or environmental sustainability. The analysis of CASIPEDIA have shown that SI projects usually combine both transforma>onal and sustainability strategies. 9. TRANSFORMATIONS 10. SUSTAINABILITY Lifestyle changes Economic growth Community sense Entrepreneurship Knowledge sharing Jobs and competences Stakeholders development Mul>- challenge approaches Social sustainability Economic sustainability Environmental sustainability

Example of an action plan for: Increasing staff's innovation management skills and capabilities SI ini>a>ve: WAI - Process and equipment for the recovery of rejec3on frac3ons of non- hazardous waste CONTEXT related ac3ons MOMENTUM Look at exis>ng innova>on management programmes in interna>onal Business schools, and look at compe>tors' prac>ces FORESIGHT Iden>fy emerging management skills and capaci>es in the sector, through journals, conferences RESOURCES Apply to local/ na>onal funds for management skills development MOBILISATION Establish new contacts with local/ regional business schools, and ac>on researchers dealing with management skills and capabili>es development (becoming a case study in schools) PEOPLE related ac3ons PROCESS related ac3ons IMPACT related ac3ons APTITUDE Transfer knowledge and intellectual capital on innova>on management within the company CATALYSTS Involve staff and key stakeholders in pilo>ng & experimental innova>on phases TRANSFORMATION Align personnel training objec>ves with exis>ng jobs & competences local policies ATTITUDE Foster staff s crea>vity with par>cipatory workshops, e.g. generate future ac>ons through highly- transformed scenarios KEEPERS Establish incen>ve procedures to award staff s professional development SUSTAINABILITY Develop staff s educa>on plans to conciliate personnel and company s needs in the medium- long term

Conclusions 1. CASI triple-track approach is a comprehensive process for developing SI intelligence 2. Gathering information (SI cases, visions and policies) requires highly participatory approaches (intensive work of SI partners and correspondents) 3. CASI information can be transformed into SI ideas through different types of analysis: Inductive and/or multi-source analysis of SI case studies Vision clustering (strategic level) and vision-based research priorities (programming level) Content analysis of policy briefs and blogs 4. SI experts and SI innovators insights are essential to validate and assess CASI ideas, thus upgrading CASI ideas into CASI intelligence CASI-F is a systematic process aimed to: Map SI information Identify SI ideas or critical issues Provide SI advice in the form of multi-level management actions

Thank you for your attention! Please visit us at www.casi2020.eu This project has received funding from the European Union s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreement number 612113.