Xtratherm Limited Kells Road, Navan, Co Meath

Similar documents
Rehab Glassco. Unit 4, Osberstown Industrial Park, Caragh Road, Naas, Co. Kildare. For inspection purposes only.

Glassco Recycling. Unit 4, Osberstown Industrial Park, Caragh Road, Naas, Co. Kildare. For inspection purposes only.

Soltec (Ireland) Limited Mullingar Business Park, Mullingar, Co Westmeath. Annual Noise Report

Offaly County Council

NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT 2016

Roche Ireland Limited

Roche Ireland Limited

BASELINE NOISE MONITORING SURVEY

Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals

McGill Environmental Ltd.

TECHNICAL REPORT 2016 IEL ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE SURVEY OF THE DAIRYGOLD CASTLEFARM FACILITY, MITCHELSTOWN, CO. CORK.

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT

W For inspection purposes only. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the approval of BnM Environmental.

REPORT PERIOD: JANUARY 01 MARCH

Noise Monitoring Report For. Schloetter (Ireland) Ltd. Naas Enterprise Park, Naas, Co. Kildare

CENTRAL WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY, INAGH, CO. CLARE. ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE MONITORING MAY 2017.

Liddell Coal Operations

Ashton Coal. Environmental Noise Monitoring May Prepared for Ashton Coal Operations Pty Ltd

Liddell Coal Operations

MALONE O REGAN. Annual Noise Survey Powerstown Landfill Industrial Emission Licence No. W March 2016

Appendix 8. Draft Post Construction Noise Monitoring Protocol

Bickerdike Allen Partners

REPORT OF NOISE MONITORING OF TUTUR1C SID TRIAL AT EDINBURGH AIRPORT AUGUST TO NOVEMBER 2015 SITE 2: UPHALL

Noise monitoring during drilling operations Lower Stumble Well Site Balcombe, West Sussex

Boggabri Coal Mine. Environmental Noise Monitoring October Prepared for Boggabri Coal Operations Pty Ltd

Attended Noise Monitoring Program

Muswellbrook Coal Company

Liddell Coal Operations

Attended Noise Monitoring Program

Boggabri Coal Mine. Environmental Noise Monitoring June Prepared for Boggabri Coal Operations Pty Ltd

Muswellbrook Coal Company

Noise Assessment for Planning Purposes - as per TAN11

Boggabri Coal Mine. Environmental Noise Monitoring August Prepared for Boggabri Coal Operations Pty Ltd

Review of Baseline Noise Monitoring results and Establishment of Noise Criteria

Assured Monitoring Group

A Guide to Environmental Noise Measurement Terminology

ITV CORONATION STREET PRODUCTION FACILITY, TRAFFORD WHARF ROAD ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL NOISE & VIBRATION IMPACT OF PROPOSED METROLINK LINE

OneSteel Recycling Hexham Quarterly Noise Monitoring Report Q2 2017

Acoustics Technical Note

Proposed Hydropower Archimedean Screw Osney Lock and Weir, Oxford. Noise Impact Assessment TECHNICAL REPORT

Electricity Supply to Africa and Developing Economies. Challenges and opportunities. Planning for the future in uncertain times

SUMMARY REPORT OF NOISE MONITORING AT MEATH GREEN OCTOBER 2010 TO SEPTEMBER 2011

Cullen Valley Mine. Environmental Noise Monitoring Quarter 2, Prepared for Castlereagh Coal

Environmental Noise Assessment Cambourne to Cambridge options

Standard Guide for Measurement of Outdoor A-Weighted Sound Levels 1

Template Planning Condition on Amplitude Modulation Noise Guidance Notes

A Guide to Noise Measurement Terminology

Wambo Coal Mine and Rail Spur

Orora Pty Ltd. B9 Paper Mill EPL Compliance Quarterly noise monitoring report. 20 June Doc no QM-RP-4-0

SUMMARY REPORT OF NOISE MONITORING AT FELBRIDGE NOVEMBER 2010 TO OCTOBER 2011

Wambo Coal Mine and Rail Spur

REPORT OF NOISE MONITORING AT HAYWARDS HEATH OCTOBER 2011 TO NOVEMBER 2012

University of York Heslington East Campus Details of Noise Modelling and Noise Survey. Report ref AAc/ /R01

Portable Noise Monitoring Report March 5 - April 24, 2016 The Museum of Vancouver. Vancouver Airport Authority

Environment Protection Authority (EPA), Industrial Noise Policy (INP) 2000;

ABERDEEN HARBOUR EXPANSION PROJECT November Volume 3: Technical Appendices

REPORT OF NOISE MONITORING AT HEVER FEBRUARY 2011 TO JANUARY 2012

Orora Pty Ltd. B9 Paper Mill EPL Compliance Quarterly noise monitoring report. 11 August Doc no QM-RP-1-0

Black. LWECS Site Permit. Stearns County. Permit Section:

Protocol for Ambient Level Noise Monitoring

Methods for rating and assessing industrial and commercial sound

Keystone Pipeline Phases 1 & 2 Acoustic Monitoring Report for Canadian Pump Stations

Attended Noise Monitoring - Quarter Ending September 2013

Quarterly Noise Monitoring Report Austar Coal Mine Middle Road, Paxton NSW January 2007

Assessing the accuracy of directional real-time noise monitoring systems

Swan DH Noise Impact Assessment Report

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE MONITORING QUARTER 1, Northparkes Mines PO Box 995 Parkes NSW 2870

REPORT OF NOISE MONITORING AT LEIGH SEPTEMBER 2011 TO NOVEMBER 2012

Wambo Coal Mine and Rail Spur

Sheringham Shoal Cawston, Norfolk. Substation Noise Assessment Summary

79 First Avenue Mob: FIVE DOCK NSW 2046 VENTILATED ACOUSTIC ENCLOSURE NOISE EMISSION ASSESSMENT ACOUSTIC SERVICES & ADVICE

Mackas Sand Pty Ltd ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE MONITORING AUGUST 2014

Noise and Ground-Borne Vibration Monitoring

The following is the summary of Keane Acoustics community mechanical noise study for the City of St. Petersburg.

Orora Compliance Monitoring

Pre-Construction Sound Study. Velco Jay Substation DRAFT. January 2011 D A T A AN AL Y S IS S OL U T I ON S

REPORT OF NOISE MONITORING AT DOMEWOOD DECEMBER 2012 TO DECEMBER 2013

Environment Protection Authority (EPA), Industrial Noise Policy (INP) 2000;

M Sport Evaluation Centre ( MEC ) Dovenby Hall Estate

Muswellbrook Coal Company

Appendix D: Preliminary Noise Evaluation

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

A REPORT OF MONITORING OF AIRCRAFT NOISE FROM STANSTED AIRPORT AT HELIONS BUMPSTEAD, ESSEX BETWEEN SEPTEMBER AND DECEMBER 2008

Pipeline Blowdown Noise Levels

PURPLE LINE EXTENSION SECTION 2 AMBIENT NOISE LEVEL REPORT METRO PROJECT RODEO STATION

REPORT OF NOISE MONITORING AT COWDEN JULY 2014 TO JUNE 2016

ACOUSTIC BARRIER FOR TRANSFORMER NOISE. Ruisen Ming. SVT Engineering Consultants, Leederville, WA 6007, Australia

Environmental Noise Propagation

Wambo Coal Mine and Rail Spur

Appendix G Noise and Vibration Assessment

CALGA SAND QUARRY ATTENDED COMPLIANCE NOISE MONITORING 12 APRIL 2017 REPORT NO E VERSION A APRIL 2017 PREPARED FOR

Orora Compliance Monitoring

Mackas Sand Pty Ltd ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE MONITORING JULY 2013

Fundamentals of Environmental Noise Monitoring CENAC

R e p o r t th A u g u s t

CORRECTION NOTICE SOUTH AFRICAN CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY CIVIL AVIATION ACT, 2009 (ACT NO. 13 OF 2009)

Lion s Gate Secondary Wastewater Treatment Plant Pile Driving North Vancouver, BC. Final Report Rev 1

Black Butte Copper Project Mine Operating Permit Application (Revision 3)

Average Leq Ambient Noise levels db(a) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night

Average Leq Ambient Noise levels db(a) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night

Transcription:

Air I Noise I Water I Soil I Environmental Consultancy www.axisenv.ie Unit 5 Caherdavin Business Centre Ennis Road Limerick Kells Road, Navan, Co Meath Annual Environmental Noise Survey 2017 IPPC Licence Number: P0583-01 Report Reference Number: 3050-17-01 Version: 1 Date of Issue: 20-03-2017 Report Compiled by: Daniel Mullins EPA Export 30-05-2017:03:20:11

Report Content 1.0 Executive Summary. 3 2.0 Introduction. 4 3.0 Methods Employed. 5 4.0 Monitoring Locations. 6 5.0 Noise Measurement Data. 8 6.0 Conclusions. 13 Report Date 20-03-2017 Site Contact: Jason Woods Report Issued By Mark Mc Garry Version No: 1 Signed: Client: Notes: Report No: 3050-16-02 Page 2 of 30 Version: 1 EPA Export 30-05-2017:03:20:11

1.0 Executive Summary is required as part of license P0583-01; Conditions 3 and 7 to carry out a noise survey of the installation on an annual basis. AXIS environmental services were commissioned to complete the survey after proposal acknowledgment and acceptance by Xtratherm Environmental Department Representatives. The purpose of the survey was to monitor noise at predetermined locations and assess the sites compliance against License limits. All operations at were running as normal throughout the survey. There was significant interference attributed to traffic movements on the R147, a regional road connecting to the N51 which runs through Navan town. Other sources of noise were recorded at each individual location which are summarised in the report. The impact of road traffic noise was a significant interference on the survey at certain locations as defined in the report. As outlined in the Standard ISO 1996 and the associated noise guidance document issued by the Agency in 2012, where traffic noise is interfering with noise measurements, it is acceptable to assess noise compliance against the LA90 for the monitoring period. This is a statistical measurement of the noise level exceeded for 90% of the time which would largely be associated with the facility under assessment. The survey was carried out in strict accordance with the standard ISO 1996 Parts 1 3, Acoustics description, measurement and assessment of environmental noise. Reference was also made to the EPA guidelines NG4 Guidance Note for Noise: Licence Applications, Surveys and Assessments in Relation to Scheduled Activities April 2012, in conjunction with the frequently asked questions issued by the Agency in August 2012. Reference was also made to the EPA guidelines NG4 Guidance Note for Noise: Licence Applications, Surveys and Assessments in Relation to Scheduled Activities January 2016. Five points were monitored for the noise survey NM1, NM2, NM3, NM4 and NM5. NM1 to NM4 are boundary monitoring points which are located within the confines of the site and are in close proximity to all activities in operation. NM4 LAeqT broadband levels were exceeded during the night time survey after background levels were removed from the sample recording. This point is however within the facility and not deemed a noise sensitive location. Due to interference from traffic noise at NM5 it is appropriate to use the LA90 to assess Xtratherm against its license limits. There was no tonal or impulsive noise observed at any of the other locations for the duration of the assessment. The broadband noise levels recorded at each boundary point were all within EPA guidelines, when account was made for external interferences. Report No: 3050-16-02 Page 3 of 30 Version: 1 EPA Export 30-05-2017:03:20:11

2.0 Introduction As part of compliance monitoring at, an annual noise survey is to be carried out at nearest noise sensitive locations in the vicinity of the plant. The Agency and Xtratherm have agreed the monitoring points chosen to meet the requirements of the license. The license P0583-01 outlines Xtratherms s requirements under Conditions 3 and 7, which have been documented as follows: 2.1 Condition 3: 3.3.1) Noise from the activity shall not give rise to sound pressure levels (Leq, 15 minutes) measured at any noise sensitive locations which exceed the specified limit value. 2.2 Condition 7: 7.1 Activities on-site shall not give rise to noise levels off-site, at noise sensitive locations, which exceed the following sound pressure limits (Leq, 15 minutes) subject to Condition 3 of this licence: 7.1.1 Daytime: 55 db(a), 7.1.2 Night-time: 45 db(a). 7.2 There shall be no clearly audible tonal component or impulsive component in the noise emission from the activity at any noise sensitive location. 7.3 The licensee shall carry out a noise survey of the site operations within six months of commencement of any licensed activity and annually thereafter. The licensee shall consult with the Agency on the timing, nature and extent of the survey and shall develop a survey programme to the satisfaction of the Agency. The survey programme shall be submitted to the Agency in writing at least one month before the survey is to be carried out. A record of the survey results shall be available for inspection by any authorised persons of the Agency, at all reasonable times, and a summary report of this record shall be included as part of the AER. Table 1: Noise Monitoring Location Measurement Frequency NM1 NM2 NM3 NM4 NM5 15 minute Day & Night survey to include 1/3 rd octave measurements 15 minute Day & Night survey to include 1/3 rd octave measurements 15 minute Day & Night survey to include 1/3 rd octave measurements 15 minute Day & Night survey to include 1/3 rd octave measurements 15 minute Day & Night survey to include 1/3 rd octave measurements Annually Annually Annually Annually Annually Report No: 3050-16-02 Page 4 of 30 Version: 1 EPA Export 30-05-2017:03:20:11

3.0 Methods Monitoring was carried out in strict accordance with ISO 1996 Parts 1 3, Description and Measurement of Environmental Noise. Reference was also made to the EPA guidelines NG4 Guidance Note for Noise: Licence Applications, Surveys and Assessments in Relation to Scheduled Activities April 2012, in conjunction with the frequently asked questions issued by the Agency in August 2012. Table 2: Equipment Details Meter No 2 Meter No 4 Manufacturer Cirrus Optimus Green Cirrus Optimus Green Model CR:171B CR:172B Serial Number G061082 G078197 Firmware V2.4.1569 (1529) V2.8.2327 CR:515 Acoustic CR:515 Acoustic Calibrator Calibrator Calibrator Microphone B&K4192-1920791 B&K4192-1920791 UA:237 90mm Foam UA:237 90mm Foam Windshield Type Windshield Windshield Calibration Details Noise Meter 20 th April 2016 2017 02 nd June 2016 2017 Certificate Number 237309 238637 Calibrator 20 th April 2016 2017 02 nd June 2016 2017 Certificate Number 237309 238637 On site SLM Calibration Prior to Survey 93.7 93.7 Calibration Offset -2.14 0.38 Post Survey 93.7 93.7 Calibration Offset -2.18 0.2 Frequency Weighting A - Broadband A - Broadband Meter Response Time Fast Fast Report No: 3050-16-02 Page 5 of 30 Version: 1 EPA Export 30-05-2017:03:20:11

4.0 Monitoring Locations 4.1 NM1 Day Time Survey This noise monitoring location was situated on the south east boundary of the Xtratherm site, within 100 meters of the regional road R147 and 50 meters from the employee smoking area. The most prominent source of noise at this location was from the forklifts which were working nearby throughout the noise survey. There was also some operational noise from inside the buildings. 4.1.1 NM1 Night Time Survey As with the day time noise, the most notable source of noise was from the forklifts which were working around the yard. There was some operational noise from the buildings. 4.2 NM2 Day Time Survey This noise monitoring point was located on the northwest boundary of the Xtratherm site beside a small stream. Onsite machinery was the greatest source of noise, with forklifts and lorries contributing the most to noise levels. On occasion, Xtratherm personnel were also noted as talking within range of the meter. 4.2.1 NM2 Night Time Survey There was a low operational noise from Xtratherm throughout the period of this noise survey. A significant secondary source of noise was the movement of forklifts around the site. 4.3 NM3 Day Time Survey The third noise location was situated at the western boundary of the Xtratherm site. From this location, no noise could be heard from Xtratherm. A light breeze rustled nearby trees. Birds were heard chirping throughout the survey. 4.3.1 NM3 Night Time Survey The main source of noise during night time monitoring was traffic leaving the Xtratherm site. Traffic movements were also slightly audible in the distance on the R147. No noise was heard from the Xtratherm buildings during the survey. Noise was heard from forklifts on occasion. Noise could also be heard from lorry engines running nearby. 4.4 NM4 Day Time Survey Noise monitoring point 4 is located in close proximity to the canteen. A faint hum could be heard from the gas tank to the back of the site. Traffic was also heard both on and offsite. A sliding door was also heard being opened and closed several times. 4.4.1 NM4 Night Time Survey No noise was heard from Xtratherm throughout the survey. There was a low humming noise observed coming from the gas tank nearby. Car engines well running nearby which also contributed to noise levels. Report No: 3050-16-02 Page 6 of 30 Version: 1 EPA Export 30-05-2017:03:20:11

4.5 NM5 Day Time Survey This monitoring point is located outside the boundary of Xtratherm within 10 meters of an occupied dwelling. As a result, this location is a designated NSL. Traffic on the R147 was the predominant source of noise throughout the survey at this location. No noise was audible from Xtratherm. 4.5.1 NM5 Night Time Survey As with the day time noise survey, traffic on the R147 was the main source of noise throughout the survey. Operations at Xtratherm were not audible at this monitoring point. Report No: 3050-16-02 Page 7 of 30 Version: 1 EPA Export 30-05-2017:03:20:11

5 Summary of Noise Measurements Noise Monitoring Location: Period: Time NM1 (Boundary Monitoring Point) Measured Noise Levels (db re. 2 x 10-5 Pa) LAeq LAFMAX LA90 Comments 10:18 63.2 89.4 52.5 Daytime: - - - - - - - - Arithmetic Average (db): 63.2 89.4 52.5 The most prominent source of noise at this location was from the forklifts which were working nearby throughout the noise survey. There was also some operational noise from inside the buildings. Daytime Criterion, db LAr,T: - - 55 Evening: - - - - Arithmetic Average (db): - - - Evening Criterion, db LAr,T: - - - 23:48 54.1 93.3 42.8 Night Time: - - - - Arithmetic Average (db): 54.1 93.3 42.8 Night time Criterion, db LAr,T: - - 45 Weather Conditions: This site is not required to monitor noise emissions during the evening period. The most notable source of noise was from traffic on the R147. There were occasional forklifts which were working around the yard. There was some operational noise. Daytime: Evening: Night Time: Temperature ( O C) 6-2 Wind Speed (m/s) 3.6-1.6 Wind Direction: Northerly - Northerly Precipitation: 0-0 Tonal Noise Assessment Daytime: Run 1: None - - Night Time: Run 1: None - - Compliance Status Due to interference from external noise sources it is appropriate to use the LA90 to assess Xtratherm against its licence limits. This point complies for day and night time criteria Report No: 3050-16-02 Page 8 of 30 Version: 1 EPA Export 30-05-2017:03:20:11

Period: Time Noise Monitoring Location: NM2 (Boundary Monitoring Point) Measured Noise Levels (db re. 2 x 10-5 Pa) LAeq LAFMAX LA90 Comments 10:55 57.0 93.8 47.1 Daytime: - - - - - - - - Arithmetic Average (db): 57.0 93.8 47.1 Onsite machinery was the greatest source of noise, with forklifts and lorries contributing the most to noise levels. On occasion, Xtratherm personnel were also noted as talking within range of the meter. Daytime Criterion, db LAr,T: - - 55 Evening: - - - - Arithmetic Average (db): - - - Evening Criterion, db LAr,T: - - - 00:20 53.3 72.7 38.1 Night Time: - - - - Arithmetic Average (db): 53.3 72.7 38.1 Night time Criterion, db LAr,T: - - 45 Weather Conditions: This site is not required to monitor noise emissions during the evening period. There was significant interference from passing traffic on the R147. There was a low operational noise from Xtratherm throughout the period of this noise survey. A significant secondary source of noise was the movement of forklifts around the site. Daytime: Evening: Night Time: Temperature ( O C) 6-2 Wind Speed (m/s) 3.6-1.6 Wind Direction: Northerly - Northerly Precipitation: 0-0 Tonal Noise Assessment Daytime: Run 1: None - - Night Time: Run 1: None - - Compliance Status Due to interference from external noise sources it is appropriate to use the LA90 to assess Xtratherm against its licence limits. This point complies for day and night time criteria Report No: 3050-16-02 Page 9 of 30 Version: 1 EPA Export 30-05-2017:03:20:11

Period: Time Noise Monitoring Location: NM3 (Boundary Monitoring Point) Measured Noise Levels (db re. 2 x 10-5 Pa) LAeq LAFMAX LA90 Comments Daytime: 16:46 51.5 87.2 41.0 - - - - - - - - From this location, no noise could be heard from Xtratherm. A light breeze rustled nearby trees. Birds were heard chirping throughout the survey. Arithmetic Average (db): 51.5 87.2 41.0 Daytime Criterion, db LAr,T: 55 - - Evening: - - - - Arithmetic Average (db): - - - Evening Criterion, db LAr,T: - - - 23:11 48.5 77.5 37.6 Night Time: - - - - Arithmetic Average (db): 48.5 77.5 37.6 Night time Criterion, db LAr,T: - - 45 Weather Conditions: This site is not required to monitor noise emissions during the evening period. The main source of noise was traffic offsite. No noise was heard from the Xtratherm buildings during the survey. Daytime: Evening: Night Time: Temperature ( O C) 6-2 Wind Speed (m/s) 3.6-1.6 Wind Direction: Northerly - Northerly Precipitation: 0-0 Tonal Noise Assessment Daytime: Run 1: None - - Night Time: Run 1: None - - Compliance Status Due to interference from external noise sources it is appropriate to use the LA90 to assess Xtratherm against its licence limits. This point complies for day and night time criteria Report No: 3050-16-02 Page 10 of 30 Version: 1 EPA Export 30-05-2017:03:20:11

Period: Time Noise Monitoring Location: NM4 (Boundary Monitoring Point) Measured Noise Levels (db re. 2 x 10-5 Pa) LAeq LAFMAX LA90 Comments 16:45 43.5 73.6 39.9 Daytime: - - - - - - - - Arithmetic Average (db): 43.5 73.6 39.9 A faint hum could be heard from the gas tank to the back of the site. Traffic was also heard both on and offsite. A sliding door was also heard being opened and closed several times. Daytime Criterion, db LAr,T: 55 - - Evening: - - - - Arithmetic Average (db): - - - Evening Criterion, db LAr,T: - - - 23:10 46.3 73.2 41.2 Night Time: - - - - Arithmetic Average (db): 46.3 73.2 41.2 Night time Criterion, db LAr,T: - - 45 Weather Conditions: This site is not required to monitor noise emissions during the evening period. No noise was heard from Xtratherm throughout the survey. Car engines were running nearby which also contributed to noise levels. Daytime: Evening: Night Time: Temperature ( O C) 6-2 Wind Speed (m/s) 3.6-1.6 Wind Direction: Northerly - Northerly Precipitation: 0-0 Tonal Noise Assessment Daytime: Run 1: None - - Night Time: Run 1: Yes - - Compliance Status Due to interference from external noise sources it is appropriate to use the LA90 to assess Xtratherm against its licence limits. This point complies for day and night time criteria Report No: 3050-16-02 Page 11 of 30 Version: 1 EPA Export 30-05-2017:03:20:11

Period: Time Noise Monitoring Location: NM5 (Noise Sensitive Location) Measured Noise Levels (db re. 2 x 10-5 Pa) LAeq LAFMAX LA90 Comments 10:12 77.8 93.5 47.9 Daytime: 10:42 77.5 95.2 48.6 11:12 77.1 93.4 48.4 Arithmetic Average (db): 77.5 94.0 48.3 This location is a designated NSL. Traffic on the R147 was the predominant source of noise throughout the survey at this location. No noise was audible from Xtratherm. Daytime Criterion, db LAr,T: - - 55 Evening: - - - - Arithmetic Average (db): - - - Evening Criterion, db LAr,T: - - - 23:54 69.4 103.2 38.6 Night Time: 00:26 67.5 89.3 36.4 Arithmetic Average (db): 68.5 96.3 35.7 Night time Criterion, db LAr,T: - - 45 Weather Conditions: This site is not required to monitor noise emissions during the evening period. As with the day time noise survey, traffic on the R147 was the main source of noise throughout the survey. Operations at Xtratherm were not audible at this monitoring point. Daytime: Evening: Night Time: Temperature ( O C) 6-2 Wind Speed (m/s) 3.6-1.6 Wind Direction: Northerly - Northerly Precipitation: 0-0 Tonal Noise Assessment Daytime: Run 1: None - - Night Time: Run 1: None - - Compliance Status this site would be considered a noise sensitive location therefore limits outlined in the license would apply. Due to interference from traffic on the R147, it is appropriate to use the LA90 to assess this location against its licence limits. This point complies for day and night time criteria Report No: 3050-16-02 Page 12 of 30 Version: 1 EPA Export 30-05-2017:03:20:11

6.0 Conclusions Five locations were monitored for broadband and 1/3 rd Octave frequency as part of this annual environmental noise survey at. Four boundary monitoring points NM1 NM4 may not be subject to compliance limits according to EPA guidelines. They are located within the boundary of the site and are not near any of the licence defined Noise Sensitive Locations. Each point was monitored for 30 minute periods during the day and night time survey. The NSL was further tested for 1.5 hours during the day and 1 hour at night. The findings of the survey indicate that the noise sensitive locations were not adversely impacted by sources of noise at. Several internal boundary monitoring points were above the required noise levels. This was mostly as a result of traffic both on and offsite, some of which was in close proximity to the noise meter for a time. When the LA90 is taken into account, all monitoring points are fully compliant. The monitoring point NM5, had elevated Leq noise levels during the Day [77.5dB(A)] and Night [68.5 db(a)] noise survey. This was entirely due to the regular movement of traffic on the R147, c. 10m from the noise meter. Due to the interference from traffic on the regional road, the guidance recommends using the LA90 for assessment of noise emanating from the Xtratherm site, in which case the monitoring point NM5 is shown to be within compliance under the requirements of the license. The volumes of road traffic can be observed by the peaks on the broadband graphs listed in the appendix of this report. There was no tonal or impulsive noises noted coming from the Xtratherm site throughout both day and night time survey and therefore there is no requirement to apply a penalty to the site. Report No: 3050-16-02 Page 13 of 30 Version: 1 EPA Export 30-05-2017:03:20:11

Appendix I Site Map Report No: 3050-16-02 Page 14 of 30 Version: 1 EPA Export 30-05-2017:03:20:11

Appendix II Calibration Certificates Report No: 3050-16-02 Page 15 of 30 Version: 1 EPA Export 30-05-2017:03:20:11

Report No: 3050-16-02 Page 16 of 30 Version: 1 EPA Export 30-05-2017:03:20:12

Report No: 3050-16-02 Page 17 of 30 Version: 1 EPA Export 30-05-2017:03:20:12

Report No: 3050-16-02 Page 18 of 30 Version: 1 EPA Export 30-05-2017:03:20:12

Report No: 3050-16-02 Page 19 of 30 Version: 1 EPA Export 30-05-2017:03:20:12

Report No: 3050-16-02 Page 20 of 30 Version: 1 EPA Export 30-05-2017:03:20:12

Report No: 3050-16-02 Page 21 of 30 Version: 1 EPA Export 30-05-2017:03:20:12

Appendix III Glossary of Terms Note: Not all terms were used in the description of noise for this noise survey. Ambient noise Acoustic shadow Background noise Broadband Competent person The totally encompassing sound in a given situation at a given time, usually composed of sound from many sources, near and far. An acoustic shadow is an area through which sound waves fail to propagate, due to topographical obstructions or disruption of the waves via phenomena such as wind currents. The steady existing noise level present without contribution from any intermittent sources. The A weighted sound pressure level of the residual noise at the assessment position that is exceeded for 90 per cent of a given time interval, T (LAF90,T). Sounds that contain energy distributed across a wide range of frequencies. Individual possessing a combination of technical knowledge, experience and skills as outlined in Section 2.0 and who can demonstrate both practical and theoretical competence. Criterion noise level The long term mean value of the noise level that must not be exceeded. This is generally stipulated in the IPPC/Waste licence and it may be applied to a noise source, a boundary of the activity or to an NSL in the vicinity of the site. db Decibel. The scale in which sound pressure level is expressed. It is defined as 20 times the logarithm of the ratio between the RMS pressure of the sound field and the reference pressure of 20 micro pascals (20 upa). Facade level Free field The noise level at a location 1m from the facade of a building is described by the term facade level, and is subject to a higher noise level than one in an open area (free-field conditions) due to reflection effects. These are conditions in which the radiation from sound sources is unaffected by the presence of any reflecting boundaries or the source itself. In practice, it is a field in which the effects of the boundaries are negligible over the frequency range of interest. In environmental noise, true free-field measurement conditions are seldom achieved and generally the microphone will be positioned at a height between 1.2 and 1.5 metres above ground level. To minimise the influence of reflections, measurements are generally made at least 3.5 metres from any reflecting surface other than the ground. Hertz (Hz) Impulsive LAeq,T LAFN LAr,T The unit of sound frequency in cycles per second. A noise that is of short duration (typically less than one second), the sound pressure level of which is significantly higher than the background. This is the equivalent continuous sound level. It is a type of average and is used to describe a fluctuating noise in terms of a single noise level over the sample period (T).The closer the LAeq value is to either the LAF10 or LAF90 value indicates the relative impact of the intermittent sources and their contribution. The relative spread between the values determines the impact of intermittent sources, such as traffic, on the background. The A-weighted noise level exceeded for N% of the sampling internal. Measured using the Fast time weighting. The Rated Noise Level, equal to the LAeq during a specified time interval (T), plus specified adjustments for tonal character and/or impulsiveness of the sound. Report No: 3050-16-02 Page 22 of 30 Version: 1 EPA Export 30-05-2017:03:20:12

LAF10 LAF90 LAFmax LAFmin Lden Low background noise Low frequency noise LpA (db) Noise Refers to those A-weighted noise levels in the top 10 percentile of the sampling interval; it is the level which is exceeded for 10% of the measurement period. It is used to determine the intermittent high noise level features of locally generated noise and usually gives an indicator of the level of road traffic. Measured using the Fast time weighting. Refers to those A-weighted noise levels in the lower 90 percentile of the sampling interval; it is the level which is exceeded for 90% of the measurement period. It will therefore exclude the intermittent features of traffic and is used to describe a background level. Measured using the Fast time weighting. The maximum RMS A-weighted sound pressure level occurring within a specified time period. Measured using the Fast time weighting. The minimum RMS A-weighted sound pressure level occurring within a specified time period. Measured using the Fast time weighting. Is the 24 hour noise rating level determined by the averaging of the Lday with the Levening plus a 5 db penalty and the Lnight plus a 10 db penalty. An area of low background noise is one where the existing background noise levels measured during an environmental noise survey are as follows: o Average Daytime Background Noise Level 40dB LAF90, and; o Average Evening Background Noise Level 35dB LAF90, and; o Average Night-time Background Noise Level 30dB LAF90. LFN - noise which is dominated by frequency components towards the lower end of the frequency spectrum; see Appendix VI for a more detailed discussion. An A-weighted decibel K a measure of the overall level of sound across the audible frequency range (20Hz 20kHz) with A-frequency weighting (i.e. A weighting ) to compensate for the varying sensitivity of the human ear to sound at different frequencies. Any sound, that has the potential to cause disturbance, discomfort or psychological stress to a person exposed to it, or any sound that could cause actual physiological harm to a person exposed to it, or physical damage to any structure exposed to it, is known as noise. Noise sensitive location NSL any dwelling house, hotel or hostel, health building, educational establishment, place of worship or entertainment, or any other facility or other area of high amenity which for its proper enjoyment requires the absence of noise at nuisance levels. Octave band Rating level RMS SEL (LAX or LAE) Sound pressure level A frequency interval, the upper limit of which is twice that of the lower limit. For example, the 1,000Hz octave band contains acoustical energy between 707Hz and 1,414Hz. The centre frequencies used for the designation of octave bands are defined in ISO and ANSI standards. See LAr,T. The RMS (Root Mean Square) value of a set of numbers is the square root of the average of their squares. Sound exposure level a measure of the A-weighted sound energy used to describe noise events such as the passing of a train or aircraft; it is the A- weighted sound pressure level if occurring over a period of 1 second, would contain the same amount of A-weighted sound energy as the event. Sound pressure refers to the fluctuations in air pressure caused by the passage of a sound wave. It may be expressed in terms of sound pressure level at a point. Report No: 3050-16-02 Page 23 of 30 Version: 1 EPA Export 30-05-2017:03:20:12

Specific noise level Time weighting Tonal A component of the ambient noise which can be specifically identified by acoustical means and may be associated with a specific source. In BS 4142, there is a more precise definition as follows: the equivalent continuous A- weighted sound pressure level at the assessment position produced by the specific noise source over a given reference time interval (LAeq, T). One of the averaging times (Fast, Slow or Impulse) used for the measurement of RMS sound pressure level in sound level meters. Sounds which cover a range of only a few Hz which contains a clearly audible tone, i.e. distinguishable, discrete or continuous noise (whine, hiss, screech, or hum etc.) are referred to as being tonal. 1/3 octave analysis Frequency analysis of sound such that the frequency spectrum is subdivided into bands of one third of an octave each. Report No: 3050-16-02 Page 24 of 30 Version: 1 EPA Export 30-05-2017:03:20:12

Appendix IV Graphical Display of Raw Data Tonal Noise: The appropriate level differences vary with frequency. They should be greater than or equal to the following values in both adjacent one third octave bands: 15dB in low frequency one third octave bands (25Hz to 125Hz); 8dB in middle frequency bands (160Hz to 400Hz), and; 5dB in high frequency bands (500Hz to 10,000Hz) This is the definition outlined by the EPA in the guidance note issued in 2012: NG4. Report No: 3050-16-02 Page 25 of 30 Version: 1 EPA Export 30-05-2017:03:20:12

Report No: 3050-16-02 Page 26 of 30 Version: 1 EPA Export 30-05-2017:03:20:12

Report No: 3050-16-02 Page 27 of 30 Version: 1 EPA Export 30-05-2017:03:20:12

Report No: 3050-16-02 Page 28 of 30 Version: 1 EPA Export 30-05-2017:03:20:12

Report No: 3050-16-02 Page 29 of 30 Version: 1 EPA Export 30-05-2017:03:20:12

Report No: 3050-16-02 Page 30 of 30 Version: 1 EPA Export 30-05-2017:03:20:12