Antennas Orbits Modulation Noise Link Budgets U N I V E R S I T Y O F. Spacecraft Communications MARYLAND. Principles of Space Systems Design

Similar documents
Spacecraft Communications

Spacecraft Communications

High Speed Data Downlink for NSF Space Weather CubeSats

CubeSat Communications Review and Concepts. Workshop, July 2, 2009

Satellite Link Budget 6/10/5244-1

X-band CubeSat Communication System Demonstration

SATELLITE LINK DESIGN

ITU/ITSO Workshop on Satellite Communications, AFRALTI, Nairobi Kenya, 8-12, August, Link Budget Analysis

Satellite System Parameters

Satellite Signals and Communications Principles. Dr. Ugur GUVEN Aerospace Engineer (P.hD)

Opportunistic Vehicular Networks by Satellite Links for Safety Applications

Chapter 6 Solution to Problems

UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI Radio Frequency Interference in Satellite Communications Systems

Adapted from Dr. Joe Montana (George mason University) Dr. James

ARE STAR CONTRIBUTION NETWORKS MORE BANDWIDTH EFFICIENT THAN MESH NETWORKS?

Chapter 4 The RF Link

Exploiting Link Dynamics in LEO-to-Ground Communications

Glossary of Satellite Terms

Satellite Communications

Earth Station and Flyaway

Hawk Institute for Space Sciences. Firefly Comms Plan. November 30, 2009

Design of Ka-Band Satellite Links in Indonesia

Noise and Interference Limited Systems

System Noise Power 1

Digital Communications Theory. Phil Horkin/AF7GY Satellite Communications Consultant

BROADCAST SERVICES FOR NOAA S NPP/JPSS In response to CGMS action 38.47

DRONACHARYA GROUP OF INSTITUTIONS, GREATER NOIDA. SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS (EEC 021) QUESTION BANK

Final Examination. 22 April 2013, 9:30 12:00. Examiner: Prof. Sean V. Hum. All non-programmable electronic calculators are allowed.

Protection criteria for Cospas-Sarsat local user terminals in the band MHz

Satellite Link Design: A Tutorial

Satellite Link Budget Calculator by Using Matlab/GUI

To study and describe RF interference in Fixed Service (FS) Satellite Systems, from a link budget perspective.

THE BASICS OF RADIO SYSTEM DESIGN

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R SA (Question ITU-R 131/7) a) that telecommunications between the Earth and stations in deep space have unique requirements;

TELECOMMUNICATION SATELLITE TELEMETRY TRACKING AND COMMAND SUB-SYSTEM

SATELLIT COMMUNICATION

Recommendation ITU-R SA (07/2017)

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R M.1184

EEG 816: Radiowave Propagation 2009

Mobile and Wireless Networks Course Instructor: Dr. Safdar Ali

Satellite TVRO G/T calculations

Background. High Performance Earth Observation Satellites need High Bit Rate Down Link. SkySat-2 (100 kg) 300Mbps 8PSK in X-band

Technical and operational characteristics for the fixed service using high altitude platform stations in the bands GHz and

Experiment of 348 Mbps downlink from 50-kg class satellite

Ground Based DVB-S2 Repeater for GEO Satellites

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R SA (Question ITU-R 210/7)

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R SA.364-5* PREFERRED FREQUENCIES AND BANDWIDTHS FOR MANNED AND UNMANNED NEAR-EARTH RESEARCH SATELLITES (Question 132/7)

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R S.1512

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R S.1557

INSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING (Autonomous) Dundigal, Hyderabad

*everything you wanted to know about satellite antenna theory but were afraid to ask

Chapter 3 Solution to Problems

Satellite Link Budget Calculator by Using Matlab/GUI

Chapter 4 Radio Communication Basics

Antennas and Propagation. Chapter 5

0.6 kbits/s, the modulation shall be aviation binary phase shift keying (A-BPSK).

1. Discuss in detail the Design Consideration of a Satellite Communication Systems. [16]

Satellite Communications

Study of Factors which affect the Calculation of Co- Channel Interference in a Radio Link

Chapter 1 Introduction

Amateur Radio License. Propagation and Antennas

WIRELESS BACKHAUL. A Primer on Microwave and Satellite Communications. Dr Rowan Gilmore CEO, EM Solutions MILCIS November 2015

The Friis Transmission Formula

SRSP-101 Issue 1 May Spectrum Management. Standard Radio System Plan

Space Frequency Coordination Group

Link Budgets International Committee on GNSS Working Group A Torino, Italy 19 October 2010

GPS receivers built for various

Antennas and Propagation. Chapter 5

Day 1 Session 2. Earth Station Technology

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R S * Maximum permissible level of off-axis e.i.r.p. density from very small aperture terminals (VSATs)

Week 2. Topics in Wireless Systems EE584-F 03 9/9/2003. Copyright 2003 Stevens Institute of Technology - All rights reserved

Outlines. Attenuation due to Atmospheric Gases Rain attenuation Depolarization Scintillations Effect. Introduction

Data and Computer Communications. Tenth Edition by William Stallings

Satellite Tracking, Telemetry and Command Design Basis

This Antenna Basics reference guide includes basic information about antenna types, how antennas work, gain, and some installation examples.

Tracking, Telemetry and Command

MEASUREMENT OF THE EARTH-OBSERVER-1 SATELLITE X-BAND PHASED ARRAY

Antennas and Propagation

EIE339 Digital Transmission and Switching Systems

WIRELESS LINKS FOR 8K SUPER HI-VISION PROGRAM PRODUCTION

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R S.524-6

X band downlink for CubeSat

Using Variable Coding and Modulation to Increase Remote Sensing Downlink Capacity

Unit 3 - Wireless Propagation and Cellular Concepts

L(f) = = (f) G(f) L2(f) Transmission Impairments: Attenuation (cont.)

Antennas and Propagation

SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS

ARTICLE 22. Space services 1

CS-435 spring semester Network Technology & Programming Laboratory. Stefanos Papadakis & Manolis Spanakis

h max 20 TX Ionosphere d 1649 km Radio and Optical Wave Propagation Prof. L. Luini, July 1 st, 2016 SURNAME AND NAME ID NUMBER SIGNATURE

Antennas and Propagation

Antenna Performance. Antenna Performance... 3 Gain... 4 Radio Power and the FCC... 6 Link Margin Calculations... 7 The Banner Way... 8 Glossary...

LINK MARGIN FOR WIRELESS RADIO COMMUNICATION LINK

MICROWAVE RADIO SYSTEMS GAIN. PENTel.Com Engr. Josephine Bagay, Ece faculty

Earth-Stations. Performance Requirements

Chapter 15: Radio-Wave Propagation

Digital Signal Analysis

Radio Propagation Fundamentals

QUESTION BANK SUBJECT: DIGITAL COMMUNICATION (15EC61)

Link Budget (1) Lecture 8

Transcription:

Antennas Orbits Modulation Noise Link Budgets

The Problem Pointing Loss Polarization Loss Atmospheric Loss, Rain Loss Space Loss Pointing Loss Transmitter Antenna SPACE CHANNEL Receiver Power Amplifier Galactic, Star, Terrestrial Noise Antenna Transmitter Modulator Receiver Noise Receiver Encoder Command & Data Handling (C&DH) Information Implementation Loss Demodulator Decoder Compression Information Data Decompression Satellite transmitter-to-receiver link with typical loss and noise sources

Antennas Receive & transmit RF (radio frequency) energy Size/type selected directly related to frequency/required gain Omni Antenna (idealized) Gain Pattern Directional (Hi-Gain) Antenna 360 0 dbi Isotropic antenna Omni Antenna (typical) phi = 0 degrees Theta Cut 100 90 80 110 70 120 60 130 50 140 40 150 160 plot1 mtheta 170 plot2 mtheta Three_dB 180 30 20 10 0-3 db Beamwidth f = 2209 serial = 190 200 210 MHz efficiency= 95.113 220 230 Test_date = "May 22, 2002" 240 "Dryden AK490 Final" $ mtheta # step! # " ' % ( & 180 ) 250 290 260 270 280, 300 ( 360mthetastep! * # ) # " 180, i_3db 1000 # 2 # " db_per_div= 2 RHCP_max= 5.716 Plot_max= 10 310 db 320 dbic db max 330 350 340 On-axis gain max OAgainmax= 5.642 test_range = "Anechoic C Gain is relative to isotropic with units of dbi Side Lobes Boresight Peak Gain = X dbi

Orbit Considerations UNIVERSITY OF

Ground Station Coverage

Ground Station Coverage Florida ground station with spacecraft altitudes 400, 800, and 1200 km 400 km 800 km 1200 km Merritt Island

Ground Station Coverage Ground station elevation angles of 0, 10, and 20 degrees

Ground Station Coverage Effects of terrain and antenna limitations Another antenna Building Antenna limits

Ground Station Coverage Hawaii (HAW3), Alaska (AGIS), Wallops Island (WPSA), Svalbard (SGIS), McMurdo (MCMS) AGIS Svalbard HAW3 WPSA MCMS

Frequency Bands S-Band 2-3 GHz Space operation, Earth exploration, Space research X-Band 7-8 GHz Earth exploration, Space research Ku-Band 13-15 GHz Space research Loss from rain Ka-Band 23-28 GHz Inter-satellite, Earth exploration Radio TV VHF S-Band C-Band X-Band Ku-Band Ka-Band W-Band Lasers

Types of Modulation Amplitude Modulation s(t) = A [1 + m(t)] cos(2πf c t) Easy to implement Poor noise performance Frequency Modulation x(t) = A cos[2π 0->t (f c + f m(τ))dτ] Requires frequency lock loop Polarization Modulation s(t) = A cos[2πf c t + βm(t)] Requires phase lock loop Most digital modulation techniques involve PM

Polarization Orientation of electric field vector Shape traced by the end of the vector at a fixed location, as observed along the direction of propagation Some confusion over left hand/right hand conventions Linear Polarization Vertical Linear Polarization Horizontal Circular Polarization Left hand C ircular Polarization Right hand

Digital Modulation Techniques On-Off Keying (OOK) Frequency Shift Keying (FSK) Bi-Phase Shift Keying (BPSK) Quadrature Phase Shift Keying (QPSK) BPSK QPSK

Noise Any signal that isn t part of the information sent Signal noise Amplitude noise error in the magnitude of a signal Phase noise error in the frequency / phase modulation System Noise Component passive noise Component active noise (amplifiers, mixers, etc ) Environmental Noise Atmospheric noise Galactic noise Precipitation

Signal Noise Amplitude Noise Phase Noise

System Noise All real components generate thermal noise due to the random motion of atoms Passive devices thermal noise is directly related to the temperature of the device, its bandwidth, and the frequency of operation Noise is generated by thermal vibration of bound charges A moving charge generates an electromagnetic signal Passive components include Resistive loads (power loads) Cables & other such things (like waveguides)

Environmental Noise Rain loss, particularly in the Ku band Snow is not a problem Lightning Stars, galaxies, planets Human interference

Noise Temperature Noise temperature provides a way of determining how much thermal noise is generated in the receiving system The physical noise temperature of a device, T n, results in a noise power of P n = KT n B K = Boltzmann s constant = 1.38 x 10-23 J/K; K in dbw = -228.6 dbw/k T n = Noise temperature of source in Kelvins B = Bandwidth of power measurement device in hertz Satellite communications systems work with weak signals, so reduce the noise in the receiver as far as possible Generally the receiver bandwidth is just large enough to pass the signal Liquid helium can hold the physical temperature down

S/N and NF Signal to Noise Ratio Most common description of the quantity of noise in a transmission Noise Figure S/N of input divided by S/N of output for a given device (or devices) in a communications system Related to the noise temperature of a device: T d = T 0 (NF - 1) T 0 = reference temperature, usually 290 K

System Noise Temperature Example 1: Gain = 0 dbi 3 db T sky = 50 LNA Dow nconv erter IF AMP RECEIVER Loss = L 1!= L 1!= 3 db/ 10 10 NF LNA = 2 db = 1.585 G LNA = 35 db = 3162.3 W = 0.5 NF DC = 10 db = 10 G DC = 30 db = 1000 W NF IF = 10 db = 10 G IF = 30 db = 1000 W NF R = 10 db = 10 G R = 30 db = 1000 W T s @ Reference Point G @ Reference Point = 0 db System Noise Temperature T s K T o is reference temperature of each device = 290 K (assumed) ( 1"!) T ( NF " 1) T ( NF " 1) T ( NF " ) o LNA o PC o IF 1 To Ts # Tsky + + + + +...!!! G! G G LNA LNA DC T s = 50 + 290 + 2*0.585*290 + (2*10*290 /3162.3) * (1 + 1/1,000 + 1/1,000,000) T s = 681.136 K = 28.33 db

System Noise Temperature Example 2: Gain = 0 dbi 3 db T sky = 50 LNA Dow nconv erter IF AMP RECEIVER Loss = L 1!= L 1 = 0.5 10!= 3 db/ 10 NF LNA = 2 db = 1.585 G LNA = 35 db = 3162.3 W NF DC = 10 db = 10 G DC = 30 db = 1000 W NF IF = 10 db = 10 G IF = 30 db = 1000 W NF R = 10 db = 10 G R = 30 db = 1000 W T s @ Reference Point G @ Reference Point = -3 db System Noise Temperature T s K T o is reference temperature of each device = 290 K (assumed) ( T s "# T sky + (1$ #)T o + ( NF LNA $1)T o + NF $1 PC )T o ( + NF $1 IF )T o +... G LNA G LNA G DC T s = 50 + 290 + 2*0.585*290 + (2*10*290 /3162.3) * (1 + 1/1,000 + 1/1,000,000) T s = 340.56 K = 25.33 db

G/T Figure of Merit Gain at a reference point, divided by the system noise temperature at that reference point Example 1: 0 db gain - 28.33 dbk = -28.33 db Example 2: -3 db gain - 25.33 dbk = -28.33 db Higher G/T = better Earth station (This one isn t very good)

BER and E b /N o The rate at which bits are corrupted beyond the capacity to reconstruct them is called the BER (Bit Error Rate). A BER of less than 1 in 100,000 bits (a BER of 10-5 ) is generally desired for an average satellite communications channel. For some types of data, an even smaller BER is desired (10-7 ). The BER is directly dependent on the E b /N o, which is the ratio of Bit Energy to Noise Density. Since noise density is difficult to control, this means that BER can be reduced by using a higher power signal, or by controlling other parameters to increase the energy transmitted per bit. The BER will decrease (fewer errors) if the E b /N o increases.

Link Margin Received E b /N o minus required E b /N o (in db) Required E b /N o found by adding losses to the expected E b /N o for the BER (which varies with encoding scheme used) " $ # E b N o % ' & Req d db " = E % b $ ' # & " Margin = E % b $ ' # & N o N o Theoretical for BER recieved db ) " $ # E b N o % ' & + ( Other System Losses db Req d db

Link Budget Example *** DOWNLINK MARGIN CALCULATION*** GSFC C.L.A.S.S. ANALYSIS #1 DATE & TIME: 10/26/ 4 8:39:23 PERFORMED BY: R BROCKDORFF LINKID: S-BAND 100 KBPS DOWNLINK FREQUENCY: 2250.0 MHz RANGE: 2078.0 km MODULATION: BPSK DATA RATE: 100.000 kbps CODING: UNCODED BER: 1.00E-05 PARAMETER VALUE REMARKS ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 01. USER SPACECRAFT TRANSMITTER POWER - dbw 6.99 NOTE A; 5.0 WATTS 02. USER SPACECRAFT PASSIVE LOSS - db 2.00 NOTE A 03. USER SPACECRAFT ANTENNA GAIN - dbi -3.00 NOTE A 04. USER SPACECRAFT POINTING LOSS - db 0.00 NOTE A 05. USER SPACECRAFT EIRP - dbwi 1.99 1-2 + 3-4 06. POLARIZATION LOSS - db 0.00 NOTE A 07. FREE SPACE LOSS - db 165.84 NOTE B; ALT: 500.0 KM, EL: 5.0 DEG 08. ATMOSPHERIC LOSS - db 0.00 NOTE A 09. RAIN ATTENUATION - db 0.00 NOTE A 10. MULTIPATH LOSS - db 0.00 NOTE A 11. GROUND STATION ANTENNA GAIN - db 44.00 NOTE A 12. GROUND STATION PASSIVE LOSS - db 1.50 NOTE A 13. GROUND STATION POINTING LOSS - db 0.00 NOTE A 14. POWER RECEIVED AT GROUND STATION dbwi -121.34 5 6-7 8-9 10 + 11 12-13 15. SYSTEM NOISE TEMPERATURE - db-degrees-k 25.39 NOTE A 16. GROUND STATION G/T - db/degrees-k 17.11 11-12 - 13-15 17. BOLTZMANN'S CONSTANT - dbw/(hz*k) -228.60 CONSTANT 18. RECEIVED CARRIER TO NOISE DENSITY db-hz 81.86 14-15 - 17 19. MODULATION LOSS - db 0.00 NOTE A 20. DATA RATE - db-bps 50.00 NOTE A 21. DIFFERENTIAL ENCODING/DECODING LOSS - db 0.00 NOTE A 22. USER CONSTRAINT LOSS - db 0.00 NOTE A 23. RECEIVED Eb/No - db 31.86 18-19 - 20-21 - 22 24. IMPLEMENTATION LOSS - db 2.00 NOTE A 25. THEOR. REQUIRED Eb/No - db 9.60 NOTE B 26. REQUIRED Eb/No - db 11.60 24 + 25 27. REQUIRED PERFORMANCE MARGIN - db 0.00 NOTE A 28. MARGIN - db 20.26 23-26 - 27 NOTE A: PARAMETER VALUE FROM USER PROJECT - SUBJECT TO CHANGE NOTE B: FROM CLASS ANALYSIS IF COMPUTED

Another Link Budget Example *** DOWNLINK MARGIN CALCULATION*** GSFC C.L.A.S.S. ANALYSIS #1 DATE & TIME: 4/ 1/99 10:13:39 PERFORMED BY: Y.WONG LINKID: EOS-AM/SGS FREQUENCY: 8212.5 MHz RANGE: 2575.0 km MODULATION: QPSK I CHANNEL Q CHANNEL --------- --------- DATA RATE: 75000.000 kbps DATA RATE: 75000.000 kbps CODING: RATE 1/2 CODED CODING: RATE 1/2 CODED BER: 1.00E-05 BER: 1.00E-05 99.95 AVAILABILITY GR EL=5 DEGREES PARAMETER VALUE REMARKS --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 01. USER SPACECRAFT TRANSMITTER POWER - dbw 11.60 NOTE A; EOL 02. USER SPACECRAFT PASSIVE LOSS - db 1.13 NOTE A 03. USER SPACECRAFT ANTENNA GAIN - dbi 4.84 NOTE A include multipath loss 04. USER SPACECRAFT POINTING LOSS - db.00 NOTE A 05. USER SPACECRAFT EIRP - dbwi 15.31 1-2 + 3-4 06. POLARIZATION LOSS - db.67 NOTE A 07. FREE SPACE LOSS - db 178.95 NOTE B 08. ATMOSPHERIC LOSS - db.45 NOTE B; EL: 5.0 DEG 09. RAIN ATTENUATION - db 1.20 Include Scintillation loss 1.1 db 10. MULTIPATH LOSS - db.00 NOTE A 11. GROUND STATION G/T - db/degrees-k 33.30 G/T with rain at 5 degrees 12. BOLTZMANN'S CONSTANT - dbw/(hz*k) -228.60 CONSTANT 13. RECEIVED CARRIER TO NOISE DENSITY - db/hz 95.95 5-6 - 7-8 - 9-10 + 11-12 I CHANNEL Q CHANNEL --------- --------- 14. I-Q CHANNEL POWER SPLIT LOSS - db 3.01 3.01 NOTE B; 1.00 TO 1.00 15. MODULATION LOSS - db.20.20 NOTE A 16. DATA RATE - db-bps 78.75 78.75 NOTE A 17. DIFFERENTIAL ENCODING/DECODING LOSS - db.20.20 NOTE A 18. USER CONSTRAINT LOSS - db 1.60 1.60 2 db Includes diff encoding and modulation losses 19. RECEIVED Eb/No - db 12.19 12.19 13-14 - 15-16 - 17-18 20. IMPLEMENTATION LOSS - db 2.00 2.00 21. THEOR REQUIRED Eb/No - db 4.25 4.25 I: NOTE B; Q: NOTE B 22. REQUIRED Eb/No - db 6.25 4.25 20 + 21 23. REQUIRED PERFORMANCE MARGIN - db 3.00 3.00 NOTE A 24. MARGIN - db 2.94 2.94 19-22 - 23 NOTE A: PARAMETER VALUE FROM USER PROJECT - SUBJECT TO CHANGE NOTE B: FROM CLASS ANALYSIS IF COMPUTED

Diagram of the Budgeted Link QPSK Σ Losses = 0.67 db Polarization loss 178.95 db space loss @ 2575 KM and 5 elevation 0.45 db atmospheric loss 1.2 db rain loss I = 75 MBPS 8212.5 MHz Encoder & Transmitter Loss = 1.13 db SPACE 11m Ground Antenna LNA Receiv er Q = 75 MBPS Gain = 4.84 dbi G/T = 33.3 db/k data 11.6 dbw 10.49 dbw 15.31 dbw C = 95.95 db Hz N o I Q & $ % E b N o #! " r = 12.19 db Decoder & $ % E b N o #! " REQ'D = 4.25 db Alaska SAR Facility 11 meter antenna Implementation Loss = 2.0 db Decoded Data MARGIN = 5.94 db