STRATFORD MINING COMPLEX

STRATFORD MINING COMPLEX Prepared for: Stratford Coal Pty Ltd PO Box 168 Gloucester NSW 2422 SLR Ref: 630.11771-R06 Version No: v0.1

PREPARED BY SLR Consulting Australia Pty Ltd ABN 29 001 584 612 10 Kings Road New Lambton NSW 2305 Australia (PO Box 447 New Lambton NSW 2305 Australia) T: +61 2 4037 3200 F: +61 2 4037 3201 E: newcastleau@slrconsulting.com www.slrconsulting.com BASIS OF REPORT This report has been prepared by SLR Consulting Australia Pty Ltd with all reasonable skill, care and diligence, and taking account of the timescale and resources allocated to it by agreement with Stratford Coal Pty Ltd (the Client). Information reported herein is based on the interpretation of data collected, which has been accepted in good faith as being accurate and valid. This report is for the exclusive use of the Client. No warranties or guarantees are expressed or should be inferred by any third parties. This report may not be relied upon by other parties without written consent from SLR SLR disclaims any responsibility to the Client and others in respect of any matters outside the agreed scope of the work. DOCUMENT CONTROL Reference Date Prepared Checked Authorised 630.11771-R06-v1.0 20 Martin Davenport Robert Hall Robert Hall Page 2

CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION... 5 2 SMC NOISE CRITERIA... 5 2.1 Project Approval Schedule 3 Environmental Performance Conditions... 6 2.2 EPL Noise Limits... 9 2.3 Assessment of Low-frequency Emissions... 10 3 OPERATIONAL NOISE MONITORING METHODOLOGY... 11 3.1 General Requirements... 11 3.2 Operator-attended Noise Monitoring Locations... 11 4 RESULTS... 13 4.1 Operator-attended Noise Monitoring - SMC Operational Activity... 13 4.1.1 Operator-attended Noise Survey Results - Atkins 13 4.1.2 Operator-attended Noise Survey Results - Clarke gates 14 4.1.3 Operator-attended Noise Survey Results - Hall 15 4.1.4 Operator-attended Noise Survey Results - Lowrey 16 4.1.5 Operator-attended Noise Survey Results - Pryce-Jones 17 4.1.6 Operator-attended Noise Survey Results - Ellis 18 4.1.7 Operator-attended Noise Survey Results - Van der Drift 19 5 PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT... 20 5.1 Operations... 20 5.2 Sleep Disturbance... 20 6 CONCLUSION... 21 DOCUMENT REFERENCES TABLES Table 1 Noise Limits for the Nominated Attended Noise Monitoring Locations... 10 Table 2 Noise Monitoring Locations... 11 Table 3 Operator-attended Noise Survey Results - Atkins... 13 Table 4 Operator-attended Noise Survey Results - Clarke gates... 14 Table 5 Operator-attended Noise Survey Results - Hall... 15 Table 6 Attended Noise Survey Results - Lowrey... 16 Table 7 Attended Noise Survey Results Pryce Jones... 17 Page 3

CONTENTS Table 8 Attended Noise Survey Results - Ellis... 18 Table 9 Attended Noise Survey Results Van der Drift... 19 Table 10 Performance Assessment - Operations... 20 Table 11 Performance Assessment - Sleep Disturbance... 20 FIGURES Figure 1 Attended Noise Monitoring Locations... 12 APPENDICES Appendix A Acoustic Terminology Appendix B Operator Attended Noise Survey Charts Page 4

1 Introduction Stratford Coal Pty Limited (DCPL), a wholly owned subsidiary of Yancoal Australia Limited (Yancoal), has commissioned SLR Consulting Australia Pty Ltd (SLR) to conduct quarterly noise monitoring for the Stratford Mining Complex (SMC) operations guided by the requirements of the Noise Management Plan (NMP), Document No. 00843638, dated September 2017. This report presents the results and findings from the operator-attended noise surveys conducted between 22 and 23 January 2018. It is understood that the SMC collectively comprises the Stratford Coal Mine (SCM), the Bowens Road North Open Cut (BRNOC) and the associated coal processing and handling facilities. Run-of-mine (ROM) coal from the Duralie Coal Mine (DCM) is transported by rail to the SMC, where it is processed along with ROM coal from the SCM and BRNOC. SMC coal is then loaded and railed on the North Coast Railway to the port of Newcastle. The objectives of the noise monitoring programme for this operating period were as follows: Conduct four rounds of external operator-attended noise measurements at the seven nominated locations, representative of receivers in the area surrounding the SMC. The seven nominated external operator-attended noise measurement locations are: Atkins Off Wenhams Cox Road, Stratford Clarke Gates conducted at Wenhams Cox Road, Stratford Hall Upper Avon Road Lowrey Off Crowthers Road, Stratford Pryce Jones The Bucketts Way, Craven Ellis Off Wenhams Cox Road, Stratford Van der Drift Wood Street. Stratford Noise monitoring will occur during a day, evening and night periods. The day, evening and night periods being those defined in the NSW Industrial Noise Policy (EPA 2000). The operator will quantify and characterise the maximum (LAmax) and the intrusive (LAeq and LCeq) noise level contributions from SMC operations over a 15 minute measurement period. In addition, the operator will quantify and characterise the overall levels of ambient noise (i.e. LAmax, LA1, LA10, LA50, LA90, and LAeq) over the 15 minute measurement interval. Assess the noise emissions of SMC and determine compliance with respect to the limits contained in the NMP. The following report uses specialist acoustic terminology. An explanation of common terms is provided in Appendix A. 2 SMC Noise Criteria The figures presented in this Section are extracts from the Stratford Extension Project (SSD-4966) Development Consent dated 29 May 2015. Page 5

2.1 Project Approval Schedule 3 Environmental Performance Conditions Page 6

Page 7

Page 8

2.2 EPL Noise Limits According to the EPL 5161 Condition L2 and EPL 11745 Condition L2, the site specific noise limits for the seven nominated attended noise monitoring locations are summarised in Table 1. Page 9

Table 1 Noise Limits for the Nominated Attended Noise Monitoring Locations Locality Intrusiveness Criteria LAeq(15minute) Modification LA1(1minute) Criterion Day Evening Night Night Atkins 35 35 35 45 Clarke gates 1,2 37 37 - - Hall 35 35 35 45 Lowrey 35 35 35 45 Pryce Jones 3 43 43 43 49 Ellis/Denyer 2 35 35 - - Van der Drift 2 35 35 35 45 Note 1: Clarke gates is the alternate location to R. Bagnall, as the owner does not permit monitoring on their property. Note 2: Owned by Stratford Coal Pty Ltd. Note 3: Land subject to acquisition upon request. 2.3 Assessment of Low-frequency Emissions To address the low-frequency noise assessment issues raised in the 2014 Independent Environmental Audit, as outlined in the VIPAC letter (29N-15-0009-TNT-472681-0, dated 26 February 2015), the following analysis of the operator-attended monitoring data is proposed: a full L Ceq minus L Aeq spectrum low frequency analysis will be conducted on all noise compliance measurements where the mine noise contribution is deemed to be the dominant noise source. This will be conducted in accordance with the guidance set out in the INP in accordance with the requirements of Development Consent 23-98/99 Schedule 3 Condition 7(a) and Development Consent 39-02-01 Schedule 2 Condition 6.4C(a)(i). The low-frequency analysis proposed above shall also serve to meet the Compliance Monitoring requirement of Section 5(d) of Appendix 6 Noise Compliance Assessment of the Stratford Extension Project Development Consent (SSD-4966, dated 29 May 2015), that states: the use of an appropriate modifying factor for low frequency noise to be applied during compliance testing at any individual residence if low frequency noise is present (in accordance with the INP 1 ) and before comparison with the specified noise levels in the consent. A full LCeq minus LAeq spectrum low frequency analysis was not conducted on the noise compliance measurements in this round of SMC monitoring as the mine noise contribution... was not deemed to be the dominant noise source and shall not be addressed further in this report. The results of the operator attended noise measurements presented in Section 3. 1 Low frequency noise now assessed under the NSW Nosie Policy for Industry (NPI) methodology Page 10

3 Operational Noise Monitoring Methodology 3.1 General Requirements All acoustic instrumentation employed throughout the monitoring programme has been designed to comply with the requirements of AS IEC 61672.1 2004 Electroacoustics Sound level meters Specifications, AS IEC 61672.2-2004, AS IEC 61672.3-2004 and carried current NATA or manufacturer calibration certificates. Instrument calibration was checked before and after each measurement survey, with the variation in calibrated levels not exceeding ±0.5 dba. 3.2 Operator-attended Noise Monitoring Locations Noise monitoring was conducted in accordance with the requirements of the NMP. Operator-attended noise measurements were conducted during the day, evening and night-time period for a minimum of 15 minutes per period at each of the seven nominated noise monitoring locations. The details of the operator-attended mine noise monitoring locations are contained within Table 2 and shown in Figure 1. During the operator-attended noise measurements, the character and relative contribution of ambient noise sources and SMC contributions were determined by observations on site. Table 2 Noise Monitoring Locations Monitoring Location Receiver Type Resident / Owner Monitoring Location - MGA Zone 56 Easting (m) Northing (m) Atkins Residence Atkins 401544 6447134 Clarke gates Residence Clarke 404261 6445139 Hall Residence Hall 398269 6443709 Lowrey Residence Lowrey 399193 6445879 Pryce Jones Residence Pryce Jones 4008007 6441846 Ellis Residence Ellis 403355 6446997 Van der Drift Residence Van der Drift 400171 6445775 The objective of the operator-attended noise monitoring was to measure the maximum (LAmax) and the LAeq(15minute) noise level contributions at the nearest potentially affected receptors to determine the noise contribution of mining activities associated with SMC operations over a 15 minute measurement period. In addition, the operator quantifies and characterises the overall levels of ambient noise in the area (i.e. LAmax, LA1, LA10, LA90, and LAeq) over the 15 minute measurement interval. Operator-attended noise measurements were conducted using a one-third octave integrating Brüel & Kjær Type 2270 sound level meter (s/n 2679354) together with a Svantek SV30A acoustical calibrator (s/n 24713). Page 11

397000 398000 399000 400000 401000 402000 403000 404000 405000 H:\Projects-SLR\630-SrvNTL\630-NTL\630.11771 Stratford Quarterly Noise Monitoring2016\06 SLR Data\01 Drafting\Figures\ArcGIS\SLR63011771_F01_SiteLocalitySurrounds_01.mxd LEGEND!( Hall!( Lowrey!( Van der Drift Pryce_Jones!( Atkins!(!( Ellis Clarke Gates!( Attended Noise Monitoring Locations I 0 5 10 15 20 Kilometers Scale: 1:50,000 GDA 1994 MGA Zone 56!( 25/11/2016 630.11771 6439000 6440000 6441000 6442000 6443000 6444000 6445000 6446000 6447000 6448000 6449000 6450000 Sheet Size : A4 Attended Noise Monitoring Locations www.slrconsultingaustralia.com.au PH: 61 2 4037 3200 FIGURE 1

4 Results 4.1 Operator-attended Noise Monitoring - SMC Operational Activity Operator-attended noise measurements were conducted during a day, evening and night period commencing on Monday 22 and ending Tuesday 23. Results of the operator-attended noise surveys are provided in Table 3 to Table 9, respectively. A summary of the results for the attended noise monitoring are displayed graphically in Appendix B. Charts of the noise surveys show LAmax, LAeq, and LAeq(<1.25kHz) in 1-second intervals throughout the monitoring survey. Ambient noise levels presented include all noise sources such as transport (roads, rail and aircraft), fauna (insects, frogs, birds, and bats), farm animals (cows, bulls), the natural environment (wind, wind in trees), domestic noises, other industrial operations as well as SMC noise emissions. Weather data during the monitoring period has been obtained from the weather station located on the SMC site. Where this data was not available meteorological conditions have been estimated based on observed conditions during the monitoring period. The tables provide the following information: Date and start time, operator and equipment details. Monitoring location. Wind velocity (m/s) and temperature (ºC) at the measurement location. Typical maximum (LAmax) and contributed LAeq(15minute) noise levels. 4.1.1 Operator-attended Noise Survey Results - Atkins Results of the operator-attended noise surveys at Atkins are provided in Table 3. Monitoring location Atkins represents residential receptors located to the north of the site. Table 3 Operator-attended Noise Survey Results - Atkins Period Date/Start Time/ Weather Day 22/1/18 17:04 35 C 3 m/s NE 2 cc Primary Noise Descriptor LAma x LA1 LA10 LA90 LAeq LAeq ( 1.25kHz) Description of Noise Emissions and Typical Maximum Noise Levels (dba) 52 41 33 28 32 29 Site related noise events: SMC: Barely Audible Dozer 23-24 LAeq(15minute) contribution <30 dba Aeroplane 38-46 Insects 26-31 Wind in trees 32-34 Livestock 34 Operator 52 Birdsong 37 Page 13

Period Date/Start Time/ Evening 22/1/18 18:59 33 C 3 m/s NNE 2 cc Night 23/1/18 02:37 21 C 1 m/s NE 1 cc Primary Noise Descriptor Description of Noise Emissions and Typical 45 36 32 29 31 24 Site related noise events: SMC: Inaudible Insects 28-34 Birdsong 38-45 Distant traffic 28 51 48 45 43 44 28 Site related noise events: SMC: Inaudible Insects 43-45 Livestock 51 Traffic 43 SMC operations were barely audible during the daytime noise monitoring period at this location consisting of stockpile dozer operations. The ambient noise environment at the monitoring location during all monitoring periods was generally dominated by natural noise sources such as birdsong and/or insect/frog noise and road traffic. 4.1.2 Operator-attended Noise Survey Results - Clarke gates Results of the operator-attended noise surveys at Clarke gates are provided in Table 4. Monitoring location Clarke gates represents residential receptors located to the east of the site. Table 4 Operator-attended Noise Survey Results - Clarke gates Period Date/Start Time/ Weather Day 22/1/18 17:48 35 C 3 m/s E 2 cc Evening 22/1/18 18:04 34 C 2 m/s E 2 cc Night 23/1/18 01:51 23 C 1 m/s N 0 cc Primary Noise Descriptor LAma x LA1 LA10 LA90 LAeq LAeq ( 1.25kHz) Description of Noise Emissions and Typical Maximum Noise Levels (dba) 76 74 70 63 66 45 Site related noise events: SMC: Inaudible Insects 60-75 Birdsong 58-63 Wind in trees 42-48 77 67 64 62 63 52 Site related noise events: SMC: Inaudible Insects 60-68 Birdsong 56 Wind in trees 42-48 Aeroplane 46 Road traffic 73-77 41 38 37 32 35 28 Site related noise events: SMC: Inaudible Wind in trees 35 Insects 33-41 Page 14

SMC operations were inaudible during all monitoring periods at this location. The ambient noise environment at the monitoring location during all monitoring periods was generally dominated by natural noise sources such as birdsong and/or insect/frog noise and road traffic. 4.1.3 Operator-attended Noise Survey Results - Hall Results of the operator-attended noise surveys at Hall are provided in Table 5. Monitoring location Hall represents residential receptors located to the southwest of the site. Table 5 Operator-attended Noise Survey Results - Hall Period Date/Start Time/ Weather Day 23/1/18 13:49 37 C 2 m/s SSW 3 cc Evening 22/1/18 20:21 30 C 3 m/s NE 1 cc Night 22/1/18 23:50 27 C 1 m/s N 0 cc Primary Noise Descriptor LAma x LA1 LA10 LA90 LAeq LAeq ( 1.25kHz) Description of Noise Emissions and Typical Maximum Noise Levels (dba) 46 41 36 27 33 30 Site related noise events: SMC: Inaudible Mechanical plant 23-24 Insects 25-33 Wind in trees 27-35 Birdsong 41-46 Traffic 28 73 60 47 36 49 47 Site related noise events: SMC: Audible Empty bin filling clunk 43 CHPP 26-29 LAeq(15minute) contribution <30 dba Livestock 43 Insects 39-54 Road traffic 73 Birdsong 50 58 52 51 34 46 35 Site related noise events: SMC: Inaudible Livestock 51-58 Insects 39-54 SMC operations were audible only during the evening period during operator-attended noise survey at this location. The major site noise contributor identified during the survey was the processing plant. The ambient noise environment at the monitoring location throughout the operator-attended noise surveys was typically dominated by natural noise sources such as birdsong and insect noise as well as livestock noise and road traffic noise. Page 15

4.1.4 Operator-attended Noise Survey Results - Lowrey Results of the operator-attended noise surveys at Lowrey are provided in Table 6. Monitoring location Lowrey represents residential receptors located to the west of the site and west of Bucketts Way. Table 6 Attended Noise Survey Results - Lowrey Period Date/Start Time/ Weather Day 23/1/18 13:13 37 C 2 m/s SSW 1 cc Evening 22/1/18 19:29 32 C 1 m/s N 2 cc Night 23/1/18 01:22 25 C 1 m/s N 1 cc Primary Noise Descriptor LAma x LA1 LA10 LA90 LAeq LAeq ( 1.25kHz) Description of Noise Emissions and Typical Maximum Noise Levels (dba) 68 57 46 34 44 37 Site related noise events: SMC: Barely audible CHPP barely audible LAeq(15minute) contribution <30 dba Train 59 Road traffic 38-47 Insects 33-43 Birdsong 47-68 55 49 43 30 39 34 Site related noise events: SMC: Audible Clunk 27-30 LAeq(15minute) contribution <30 dba Birdsong 46-55 Road traffic 36-48 Aeroplane 35 Dog barking 40 Insects 33-38 44 43 42 38 41 18 Site related noise events: SMC: Inaudible Mechanical plant 18-22 Insects 37-44 Dog barking 37 SMC operations were barely audible during the daytime with an occasional clunk audible during evening period during operator-attended noise surveys at this location. The major site noise contributor identified during the survey was the processing plant. The ambient noise environment at the monitoring location during the day and evening period was dominated by road and rail traffic as well as natural noise sources such as insects and birdsong. The ambient noise environment at the monitoring location during the night period was dominated by natural noise sources such as insects and frogs. Page 16

4.1.5 Operator-attended Noise Survey Results - Pryce-Jones Results of the operator-attended noise surveys at Pryce Jones are provided in Table 7. Monitoring location Pryce Jones represents residential receptors located in Craven to the south of the site. Table 7 Attended Noise Survey Results Pryce Jones Period Date/Start Time/ Weather Day 23/1/18 14:15 37 C 2 m/s SSW 1 cc Evening 22/1/18 20:47 30 C 1 m/s N 1 cc Night 22/1/18 23:23 28 C 1 m/s NE 0 cc Primary Noise Descriptor LAma x LA1 LA10 LA90 LAeq LAeq ( 1.25kHz) Description of Noise Emissions and Typical Maximum Noise Levels (dba) 76 66 59 41 57 53 Site related noise events: SMC: Audible CHPP 23-27 LAeq(15minute) contribution <30 dba Road traffic 59-76 Insects 40-57 72 67 58 53 57 52 Site related noise events: SMC: Audible CHPP 31-32 Clunk 38-41 LAeq(15minute) contribution 32 dba Road traffic 54-72 Insects 51-57 73 65 53 47 53 50 Site related noise events: SMC: Audible Dozer 30-37 CHPP 25-31 LAeq(15minute) contribution 31 dba LAmax contribution 37 dba Road traffic 54-72 Insects 51-57 SMC operations were audible during all operator-attended noise survey at this location. The major site noise contributor identified during the surveys was the processing plant and stockpile dozer. The ambient noise environment at the monitoring location during all operator-attended surveys was dominated by road traffic noise. Other contributory noise sources included frogs/insects and birdsong. Page 17

4.1.6 Operator-attended Noise Survey Results - Ellis Results of the operator-attended noise surveys at Ellis are provided in Table 8. Monitoring location Ellis represents residential receptors located northeast of the site. Table 8 Attended Noise Survey Results - Ellis Period Date/Start Time/ Weather Day 22/1/18 17:25 35 C 3 m/s ENE 2 cc Evening 22/1/18 18:36: 34 C 2 m/s ENE 2 cc Night 23/1/18 02:15 25 C 1 m/s N 1 cc Primary Noise Descriptor LAma x LA1 LA10 LA90 LAeq LAeq ( 1.25kHz) Description of Noise Emissions and Typical Maximum Noise Levels (dba) 78 61 45 37 52 51 Site related noise events: SMC: Inaudible Dairy motorbike 34-43 Birdsong 35-48 Wind in trees 30-36 Insects 35-46 Traffic 73-78 56 48 41 35 39 35 Site related noise events: SMC: Inaudible Livestock 49 Birdsong 56 Insects 28-33 Dairy 34-39 45 39 38 37 38 19 Site related noise events: SMC: Inaudible Dairy 19-24 Insects 38-39 Operator vehicle 45 SMC operations were inaudible during all monitoring periods at this location. The ambient noise environment at the monitoring location throughout the operator-attended noise surveys was typically dominated by road traffic during the daytime and natural noise sources such as birdsong and insect/frog noise as well as dairy related noise during the evening and night. Page 18

4.1.7 Operator-attended Noise Survey Results - Van der Drift Results of the operator-attended noise surveys at Van der Drift are provided in Table 9. Table 9 Attended Noise Survey Results Van der Drift Period Date/Start Time/ Weather Day 22/1/18 16:38 38 C 2 m/s NE 3 cc Evening 22/1/18 19:54 30 C 2 m/s 1 cc Night 23/1/18 00:17 27 C 1 m/s N 0 cc Primary Noise Descriptor LAma x LA1 LA10 LA90 LAeq LAeq ( 1.25kHz) Description of Noise Emissions and Typical Maximum Noise Levels (dba) 59 51 45 38 43 37 Site related noise events: SMC: Audible Dozer 28-39 LAeq(15minute) contribution 32 dba Insects 35-51 Birdsong 45-59 Wind in trees 25-48 63 60 50 35 47 31 Site related noise events: SMC: Audible CHPP 24-28 Clunk 31 LAeq(15minute) contribution <30 dba Insects 42-63 Road traffic 28-38 Dogs barking 47 Birdsong 35-40 42 41 35 30 33 23 Site related noise events: SMC: Inaudible Insects 33-42 Road traffic 30-38 SMC operations were barely audible during the day and evening operator-attended noise survey at this location. The site noise contributor identified during the survey was the processing plant and stockpile conveyor. The ambient noise environment at the monitoring location during the operator-attended noise surveys was typically dominated by insects and frog noise. Other contributory noise source included road/rail traffic, wind noise, dogs barking and birdsong. Page 19

5 Performance Assessment 5.1 Operations Results of the operator-attended noise measurements compared with the relevant noise criteria contained in the SMC Development Consent are given in Table 10. Table 10 Performance Assessment - Operations Estimated SMC LAeq(15minute) Contribution dba Noise Criteria LAeq(15minute) dba Compliance Day Eve Night Day Eve Night Day Eve Night Atkins <30 I/A 1 I/A 35 35 35 Yes Yes Yes Clarke 2 I/A I/A I/A 37 37 - Yes Yes N/A 3 Hall I/A <30 I/A 35 35 35 Yes Yes Yes 4 Lowrey <30 <30 I/A 35 35 35 Yes Yes Yes Pryce Jones <30 32 31 43 43 43 Yes Yes Yes Ellis 2 I/A I/A I/A 35 35 - Yes Yes N/A 3 Van der Drift 2 32 <30 I/A 35 35 35 Yes Yes Yes Note 1: Note 2: Note 3: I/A = Inaudible. Owned by Stratford Coal Pty Ltd. N/A receiver does not have night-time noise criteria. Results presented in Table 10 indicate that SMC operations during the operator-attended noise monitoring at all locations were compliant with the relevant Development Consent conditions. 5.2 Sleep Disturbance Results of the night period sleep disturbance measurements compared with the relevant noise criteria contained in the Development Consent are given in Table 11 Performance Assessment - Sleep Disturbance Location SMC LA1(1minute) Contribution Noise Criteria LA1(1minute) Compliance Atkins I/A 45 Yes Clarke gates I/A - N/A 1 Hall I/A 45 Yes Lowrey I/A 45 Yes Pryce Jones 37 49 Yes Ellis I/A - N/A 1 Van der Drift I/A 45 Yes Note 1: N/A receiver does not have sleep disturbance noise criteria. Page 20

Table 11 indicates that compliance with the relevant sleep disturbance noise criteria was achieved at all of the noise monitoring locations during the night-time noise monitoring period. 6 Conclusion SLR was engaged by Stratford Coal Pty Limited (DCPL) to conduct quarterly noise monitoring for the Stratford Mining Complex (SMC) operations guided by the requirements of the Noise Management Plan (NMP), Document No. 00843638, dated September 2017. Operator-attended noise monitoring conducted at seven locations between 22 January and 23 January 2017 in order to determine the noise performance of the SMC operations against the Development Consent conditions. Based on the measured SMC noise contribution, compliance with the relevant operational noise criteria was achieved at all noise monitoring locations during the day, evening and night monitoring periods. Based on the measured SMC noise contribution, compliance with the relevant sleep disturbance noise criteria was achieved at all noise monitoring locations during the night-time noise monitoring period. Page 21

APPENDIX A Acoustic Terminology 630.11771-R06-v1.0.docx Page 1 of 1

APPENDIX B Operator Attended Noise Survey Charts 630.11771-R06-v1.0.docx Page 1 of 12

Sound Pressure Level (dba) 1 Sound Level or Noise Level The terms sound and noise are almost interchangeable, except that in common usage noise is often used to refer to unwanted sound. Sound (or noise) consists of minute fluctuations in atmospheric pressure capable of evoking the sense of hearing. The human ear responds to changes in sound pressure over a very wide range. The loudest sound pressure to which the human ear responds is ten million times greater than the softest. The decibel (abbreviated as db) scale reduces this ratio to a more manageable size by the use of logarithms. The symbols SPL, L or LP are commonly used to represent Sound Pressure Level. The symbol LA represents A-weighted Sound Pressure Level. The standard reference unit for Sound Pressure Levels expressed in decibels is 2E-5 Pa. 2 A Weighted Sound Pressure Level The overall level of a sound is usually expressed in terms of dba, which is measured using a sound level meter with an A-weighting filter. This is an electronic filter having a frequency response corresponding approximately to that of human hearing. People s hearing is most sensitive to sounds at mid frequencies (500 Hz to 4000 Hz), and less sensitive at lower and higher frequencies. Thus, the level of a sound in dba is a good measure of the loudness of that sound. Different sources having the same dba level generally sound about equally loud. A change of 1 dba or 2 dba in the level of a sound is difficult for most people to detect, whilst a 3 dba to 5 dba change corresponds to a small but noticeable change in loudness. A 10 dba change corresponds to an approximate doubling or halving in loudness. The table below lists examples of typical noise levels Sound Pressure Level (dba) Typical Source Subjective Evaluation 130 Threshold of pain Intolerable 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 Heavy rock concert Grinding on steel Loud car horn at 3 m Construction site with pneumatic hammering Kerbside of busy street Loud radio or television Department store General Office Inside private office Inside bedroom Extremely noisy Very noisy Loud Moderate to quiet Quiet to very quiet 20 Unoccupied recording studio Almost silent Other weightings (eg B, C and D) are less commonly used than A- weighting. Sound Levels measured without any weighting are referred to as linear, and the units are expressed as db(z). 3 Sound Power Level The Sound Power of a source is the rate at which it emits acoustic energy. As with Sound Pressure Levels, Sound Power Levels are expressed in decibel units (db or dba), but may be identified by the symbols SWL or LW, or by the reference unit 1E-12 W. The relationship between Sound Power and Sound Pressure may be likened to an electric radiator, which is characterised by a power rating, but has an effect on the surrounding environment that can be measured in terms of a different parameter, temperature. 4 Statistical Noise Levels Appendix A Report 630.11771 Page 1 of 2 Acoustic Terminology Sounds that vary in level over time, such as road traffic noise and most community noise, are commonly described in terms of the statistical exceedance levels LAN, where LAN is the A-weighted sound pressure level exceeded for N% of a given measurement period. For example, the LA1 is the noise level exceeded for 1% of the time, LA10 the noise exceeded for 10% of the time, and so on. The following figure presents a hypothetical 15 minute noise survey, illustrating various common statistical indices of interest. 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 LAmax LA1 LA10 LAeq LA90 00:00 05:00 10:00 15:00 Of particular relevance, are: LA1 LA10 LA90 LAeq Monitoring or Survey Period (minutes) The noise level exceeded for 1% of the 15 minute interval. The noise level exceed for 10% of the 15 minute interval. This is commonly referred to as the average maximum noise level. The noise level exceeded for 90% of the sample period. This noise level is described as the average minimum background sound level (in the absence of the source under consideration), or simply the background level. The A-weighted equivalent noise level (basically the average noise level). It is defined as the steady sound level that contains the same amount of acoustical energy as the corresponding time-varying sound. When dealing with numerous days of statistical noise data, it is sometimes necessary to define the typical noise levels at a given monitoring location for a particular time of day. A standardised method is available for determining these representative levels. This method produces a level representing the repeatable minimum LA90 noise level over the daytime and night-time measurement periods, as required by the EPA. In addition the method produces mean or average levels representative of the other descriptors (LAeq, LA10, etc). 5 Tonality Tonal noise contains one or more prominent tones (ie distinct frequency components), and is normally regarded as more offensive than broad band noise. 6 Impulsiveness An impulsive noise is characterised by one or more short sharp peaks in the time domain, such as occurs during hammering. (630.11771 Appendix A - Acoustic Terminology.doc) SLR Consulting Australia Pty Ltd

125 160 200 250 315 400 500 630 800 1000 1250 1600 2000 2500 3150 Overall Sound Pressure Level (dba) Appendix A Report 630.11771 Page 2 of 2 Acoustic Terminology 7 Frequency Analysis Frequency analysis is the process used to examine the tones (or frequency components) which make up the overall noise or vibration signal. This analysis was traditionally carried out using analogue electronic filters, but is now normally carried out using Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) analysers. The units for frequency are Hertz (Hz), which represent the number of cycles per second. Frequency analysis can be in: Octave bands (where the centre frequency and width of each band is double the previous band) 1/3 octave bands (3 bands in each octave band) Narrow band (where the spectrum is divided into 400 or more bands of equal width) The following figure shows a 1/3 octave band frequency analysis where the noise is dominated by the 200 Hz band. Note that the indicated level of each individual band is less than the overall level, which is the logarithmic sum of the bands. 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 1/3 Octave Band Centre Frequency (Hz) (630.11771 Appendix A - Acoustic Terminology.doc) SLR Consulting Australia Pty Ltd

Figure B1 Day Period Atkins Operator Attended Noise Survey Results Figure B2 Evening Period Atkins Operator Attended Noise Survey Results 630.11771-R06-v1.0.docx Page 2 of 12

Figure B3 Night Period Atkins Operator Attended Noise Survey Results Figure B4 Day Period Clarke gate Operator Attended Noise Survey Results 630.11771-R06-v1.0.docx Page 3 of 12

Figure B5 Evening Period Clarke gate Operator Attended Noise Survey Results Figure B6 Night Period Clarke gate Operator Attended Noise Survey Results 630.11771-R06-v1.0.docx Page 4 of 12

Figure B7 Day Period Hall Operator Attended Noise Survey Results Figure B8 Evening Period Hall Operator Attended Noise Survey Results 630.11771-R06-v1.0.docx Page 5 of 12

Figure B9 Night Period Hall Operator Attended Noise Survey Results Figure B10 Day Period Lowrey Operator Attended Noise Survey Results 630.11771-R06-v1.0.docx Page 6 of 12

Figure B11 Evening Period Lowrey Operator Attended Noise Survey Results Figure B12 Night Period Lowrey Operator Attended Noise Survey Results 630.11771-R06-v1.0.docx Page 7 of 12

Figure B13 Day Period Pryce Jones Operator Attended Noise Survey Results Figure B14 Evening Period Pryce Jones Operator Attended Noise Survey Results 630.11771-R06-v1.0.docx Page 8 of 12

Figure B15 Night Period Pryce Jones Operator Attended Noise Survey Results Figure B16 Day Period Ellis Operator Attended Noise Survey Results 630.11771-R06-v1.0.docx Page 9 of 12

Figure B17 Evening Period Ellis Operator Attended Noise Survey Results Figure B18 Night Period Ellis Operator Attended Noise Survey Results 630.11771-R06-v1.0.docx Page 10 of 12

Figure B19 Day Period Van der Drift Operator Attended Noise Survey Results Figure B20 Evening Period Van der Drift Operator Attended Noise Survey Results 630.11771-R06-v1.0.docx Page 11 of 12

Figure B21 Night Period Van der Drift Operator Attended Noise Survey Results 630.11771-R06-v1.0.docx Page 12 of 12

ASIA PACIFIC OFFICES BRISBANE CANBERRA DARWIN MACKAY Level 2, 15 Astor Terrace Spring Hill QLD 4000 Australia T: +61 7 3858 4800 GPO 410 Canberra ACT 2600 Australia T: +61 2 6287 0800 5 Foelsche Street Darwin NT 0800 Australia T: +61 8 8998 0100 21 River Street Mackay QLD 4740 Australia T: +61 7 3181 3300 F: +61 7 3858 4801 F: +61 2 9427 8200 F: +61 2 9427 8200 MELBOURNE Suite 2, 2 Domville Avenue Hawthorn VIC 3122 Australia T: +61 3 9249 9400 F: +61 3 9249 9499 NEWCASTLE 10 Kings Road New Lambton NSW 2305 Australia T: +61 2 4037 3200 F: +61 2 4037 3201 PERTH Ground Floor, 503 Murray Street Perth WA 6000 Australia T: +61 8 9422 5900 F: +61 8 9422 5901 ROCKHAMPTON rockhampton@slrconsulting.com M: +61 407 810 417 SYDNEY TAMWORTH TOWNSVILLE 2 Lincoln Street Lane Cove NSW 2066 Australia T: +61 2 9427 8100 F: +61 2 9427 8200 PO Box 11034 Tamworth NSW 2340 Australia M: +61 408 474 248 F: +61 2 9427 8200 Level 1, 514 Sturt Street Townsville QLD 4810 Australia T: +61 7 4722 8000 F: +61 7 4722 8001 AUCKLAND 68 Beach Road NELSON 5 Duncan Street NEW PLYMOUTH Level 2, 10 Devon Street East Auckland 1010 New Zealand T: +64 27 441 7849 Port Nelson 7010 New Zealand T: +64 274 898 628 New Plymouth 4310 New Zealand T: +64 0800 757 695