Grand Challenges for Systems and Services Sciences

Similar documents
Marie Sklodowska Curie Actions. Business participation and entrepreneurship in Marie Skłodowska- Curie actions (FP7 and Horizon 2020)

Belgian Position Paper

Brief to the. Senate Standing Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology. Dr. Eliot A. Phillipson President and CEO

REPORT ON THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE MEMORY OF THE WORLD IN THE DIGITAL AGE: DIGITIZATION AND PRESERVATION OUTLINE

Examples of Public Procurement of R&D services within EU funded Security Research actions

Roadmap for European Universities in Energy December 2016

Information & Communication Technology Strategy

FP7 ICT Call 6: Cognitive Systems and Robotics

Expression Of Interest

Rethinking the role of Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH) in Horizon 2020: toward a reflective and generative perspective

Research Infrastructures and Innovation

School of Informatics Director of Commercialisation and Industry Engagement

Assessment of Smart Machines and Manufacturing Competence Centre (SMACC) Scientific Advisory Board Site Visit April 2018.

Clients and Users in Construction. Research Roadmap Summary

Sustainable Society Network+ Research Call

Sustainable Development Education, Research and Innovation

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 9 December 2008 (16.12) (OR. fr) 16767/08 RECH 410 COMPET 550

Added Value of Networking Case Study INOV: encouraging innovation in rural Portugal. Portugal

Engaging UK Climate Service Providers a series of workshops in November 2014

Pre-Operational Validation (POV) Examples of Public Procurement of R&D services within EU funded Security Research actions. Paolo Salieri 1/2/2017

Development of the Strategic Research Agenda of the Implementing Geological Disposal of Radioactive Waste Technology Platform

Interoperable systems that are trusted and secure

Please send your responses by to: This consultation closes on Friday, 8 April 2016.

Association of European Space Research Establishments (ESRE): Recommendations related to. Framework Programme 9

GUIDELINES SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES RESEARCH MATTERS. ON HOW TO SUCCESSFULLY DESIGN, AND IMPLEMENT, MISSION-ORIENTED RESEARCH PROGRAMMES

Social Sciences and Humanities in the Framework Programmes

Conclusions on the future of information and communication technologies research, innovation and infrastructures

Framework Programme 7

Towards a Magna Carta for Data

9 Vaccine SMEs' Needs

COLLIDE International Award 2018

Written response to the public consultation on the European Commission Green Paper: From

Report of EPSRC Mathematical Sciences in Healthcare Scoping Meeting 15 SEPTEMBER 2014

Establishing a reference framework for assessing the Socio-economic impact of Research Infrastructures

WG/STAIR. Knut Blind, STAIR Chairman

TOOL #21. RESEARCH & INNOVATION

Reputation enhanced by innovation - Call for proposals in module 3

Science Impact Enhancing the Use of USGS Science

Speech by the OECD Deputy Secretary General Mr. Aart de Geus

Compendium Overview. By John Hagel and John Seely Brown

Terms of Reference. Call for Experts in the field of Foresight and ICT

Science2Society Boosting innovation efficiency across Europe

Globalisation increasingly affects how companies in OECD countries

Water, Energy and Environment in the scope of the Circular Economy

Multi-level third space for systemic urban research and innovation

SECOND YEAR PROJECT SUMMARY

Working with SMEs on projects

WORKSHOP ON BASIC RESEARCH: POLICY RELEVANT DEFINITIONS AND MEASUREMENT ISSUES PAPER. Holmenkollen Park Hotel, Oslo, Norway October 2001

TECHNOLOGY WITH A HUMAN TOUCH

MUNICIPAL POLICY FOR THE CIRCULAR ECONOMY. Lessons learned from Amsterdam

European Commission. 6 th Framework Programme Anticipating scientific and technological needs NEST. New and Emerging Science and Technology

Research integrity. House of Commons Science and Technology Committee. Submission from the Royal Academy of Engineering.

the EU framework programme for research and innovation

Non-ferrous metals manufacturing industry: vision for the future and actions needed

Smart Specialisation and the Budapest Manifesto

Welcome to the future of energy

President Barack Obama The White House Washington, DC June 19, Dear Mr. President,

Draft executive summaries to target groups on industrial energy efficiency and material substitution in carbonintensive

CAPACITIES. 7FRDP Specific Programme ECTRI INPUT. 14 June REPORT ECTRI number

2nd Call for Proposals

COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION. of on access to and preservation of scientific information. {SWD(2012) 221 final} {SWD(2012) 222 final}

TRUCE: A Coordination Action for Unconventional Computation

Participatory backcasting: A tool for involving stakeholders in long term local development planning

Bridging the gap between real Science & Technology opportunities and EU S&T policies

2010/3 Science and technology for development. The Economic and Social Council,

Position Paper. CEN-CENELEC Response to COM (2010) 546 on the Innovation Union

16502/14 GT/nj 1 DG G 3 C

IV/10. Measures for implementing the Convention on Biological Diversity

Our digital future. SEPA online. Facilitating effective engagement. Enabling business excellence. Sharing environmental information

H2020 Theme Oriented Training on ICT. H2020 Overview. Thies Wittig. Deputy Team Leader Project "Turkey in Horizon 2020"

Towards a Consumer-Driven Energy System

Lund Revisited. Next steps in tackling Societal Challenges

Enabling ICT for. development

THE ACADEMIC-ENTERPRISE EXPERIENCES FRAMEWORK AS A GUIDE FOR DESIGN EDUCATION

Operational Objectives Outcomes Indicators

Universities and Sustainable Development Towards the Global Goals

Pre-commercial procurement in robotics HORIZON ICT 27(d)

Innovation Management & Technology Transfer Innovation Management & Technology Transfer

Meeting Report (Prepared by Angel Aparicio, Transport Advisory Group Rapporteur) 21 June Introduction... 1

At its meeting on 18 May 2016, the Permanent Representatives Committee noted the unanimous agreement on the above conclusions.

Report on the Results of. Questionnaire 1

Position Paper on Horizon ESFRI Biological and Medical Research Infrastructures

EXTEREME LIGHT INFRASTRUCTURE. ELI and experience with international cooperation. Date:

RECOMMENDATIONS. COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION (EU) 2018/790 of 25 April 2018 on access to and preservation of scientific information

Integrated Transformational and Open City Governance Rome May

Indo Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (IAJMR) ISSN:

WIPO Development Agenda

The 45 Adopted Recommendations under the WIPO Development Agenda

Workshop, University of Montenegro. WBCInno. From knowledge generation to knowledge diffusion at ZSI (Centre for Social Innovation) - Ines Marinkovic

Commission on science and Technology for Development. Ninth Session Geneva, May2006

Joint Research Centre. The European Commission s in-house science service

EU Research Integrity Initiative

Infrastructure for Systematic Innovation Enterprise

EC-Egypt Science and Technology Cooperation Agreement. Road Map

Green Paper - From Challenges to Opportunities: Towards a Common Strategic Framework. for EU Research and Innovation Funding

Achievements of FP7 examples that make us proud

VISUAL ARTS COLLECTION COORDINATOR

An Introdcution to Horizon 2020

Measuring the impact: Research into arts and cultural education

1 st EU Dialogue on Ecodesign and New Business Models for a Circular Economy. Introduction to the COBALT project

Transcription:

Grand Challenges for Systems and Services Sciences Brian Monahan, David Pym, Richard Taylor, Chris Tofts, Mike Yearworth Trusted Systems Laboratory HP Laboratories Bristol HPL-2006-99 July 13, 2006* systems, services, challenges, Europe, society The Grand Challenge To establish attainable expectations that services systems will function to specification, at predicted costs and over their intended lifetimes. * Internal Accession Date Only FET/FP7 Workshop, Brussels, January 31, 2006 Copyright 2006 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Approved for External Publication

Grand Challenges for Systems and Services Sciences 1 Brian Monahan,David Pym, Richard Taylor, Chris Tofts, Mike Yearworth Hewlett Packard Laboratories, Bristol contact: {brian.monahan, david.pym, richard.taylor, chris.tofts, mike.yearworth}@hp.com EC FET ONCE CS FP7 Workshop The Grand Challenge To establish attainable expectations that services systems will function to specification, at predicted costs and over their intended lifetimes. Why is this a Grand Challenge? Designing and managing efficient, reliable and cost effective services is not easy as frequent commercial and public sector failures continue to demonstrate. There are few organisations that do not, at least in private, acknowledge that we are rapidly approaching a crisis. Industry, academia and customers must either learn to specify and manage the complicated systems that services represent or risk economic stagnation. There are many reasons for why services are difficult to both specify and maintain, key amongst these are scale these systems are the most complicated and ambitious artefacts we have ever attempted to engineer; integration these require that hard academic disciplines as diverse as social sciences, mathematics, engineering and economics be combined in understandable and controllable manner; the environment many of these systems operate in a world of uncertain and/or shifting policy, legislation and economics; communications few of these systems can be comprehended in their totality by key stakeholders, leading to a poor understanding as to how key decisions in areas as diverse as process, technologies, expectation setting and financial policy will impact the effectiveness of the whole system. Systems failures frequently have multiple factors for example the United Kingdom Child Support Agency appears dogged by interactions between the dynamics of the underlying information systems that support policy, internal working processes, political policy and goals, and the external social environment and personal expectations. Whilst the exact nature of these interactions and their impact on the success or otherwise of service changes from example to example, their recurrence in late, over-budget and under-performing 1 This paper was prepared as a position statement for the Future and Emerging Technologies FP7 workshop held in Brussels on January 31 2006. Please contact the authors for more information. HP FET Workshop 31 st January 2006 page 1 of 4

programmes illustrates the need to develop the integrative sciences and their corresponding engineering disciplines that will make the expectation that complicated, robust systems can be constructed and managed a realistic one. As challenges go, they do not come much grander! What is the solution? Recall, then, our Grand Challenge: Establish attainable expectations that services systems will function to specification at predicted costs and over their intended lifetimes The key outcome conveyed by this challenge is the attainable expectation of function and performance, and the key mechanism for delivery is specification against predicted cost. The first thing to understand here is specification of a service system requirement: functionality, availability, reliability, other performance criteria, as well as integrity and security, regulated by service-level agreements (SLAs). In order to meet specifications, systems must be provisioned against predictable costs and demands. How can we begin to have an engineering science to support this activity? We would argue that there is a need for basic research in the underlying mathematical, computational, social, and economic sciences, together with an essential transfer of the understanding revealed to robust engineering processes. HP FET Workshop 31 st January 2006 page 2 of 4

Within this conceptual picture we can identify, by way of being leading examples, two necessary emergent socio-technological-economic frameworks: first, trust, between technologists, service providers, service users, and regulators; second, an economic environment supporting a market in services, depending shared understanding between trusted partners of trade-offs between, for example, cost and performance. We would suggest that the way forward is via formal modelling, at levels of detail and abstraction that are appropriate for the various components of the service system. Note that this is not a manifesto for formally specifying the construction, behaviours and interactions of every detail of every subsystem. Rather, we would propose the use of a range of appropriate mathematical methods e.g. stochastic, logical, dynamical together with and within a framework of experimental scientific method, deployed at appropriate levels of detail in order capture the essential aspects of systems required for specific purposes. Impact The consequences of attempting this Grand Challenge could be profound for the future of both European industry and the future of multi-disciplinary research and engineering. Broad economic consequences The most obvious consequences will be felt by both suppliers and their customers. The relatively modest gains in systems understanding and management that can be guaranteed to come from this work will make significant differences to the ability of both European companies, and indeed Europe itself to compete in a world where rapid and efficient development and deployment of technologies core to success. New models for cross-disciplinary research Effective multi-disciplinary research is difficult research culture, language and experience tends to mitigate against success. The bulk of successful collaborations (such as mathematics and biology) tend to be relatively small scale and combine two, or at most possibly three disciplines. There is already direct collaboration in the area of complicated integrative systems between industrial and multi-disciplinary academic groups. One such example is the Centre for Systems and Services Sciences. This Grand Challenge requires a level of cooperation which is an order of magnitude greater than anything that has been attempted before. As the systems under consideration are concrete and have enormous economic value, this will provide both motivation and a concrete grounding for effective research results. New design methodologies for complicated systems A rigorous systems engineering approach to the design of complicated systems will provide the necessary framework for understanding the relationship between business processes that determine the economic success of the enterprise, the information systems that embody those processes including the business applications (e.g. ERP), and the supporting infrastructure. Design that leads to predictable behaviour in the sense of attainable expectations from both vendors and customers requires understanding the tradeoffs that have to be made across this space; this is the enablement of system tri-design. For example, poor processes will be exacerbated by embodiment in IT leading to increased costs precisely the opposite of what was intended by procuring the IT system in the first place. Another example would be costly over provisioning to meet perceived requirements for HP FET Workshop 31 st January 2006 page 3 of 4

performance which could be mitigated by a suitable embodiment of the business process into an information system based on appropriate model based analysis. Measurement and management At present we have evidence of large scale IT procurement failures through reporting from the public sector mainly because of requirements for open government and general accountability for tax euros. A recent announcement predicting that public sector spending on IT in the United Kingdom will rise 40% between now and 2010 (approximately 30Bn) indicates that expectations are high that IT will simultaneously deliver cost savings in the delivery of services, e.g. through shared platforms, but at the same time facilitate greater flexibility in the way in which services are delivered. With this example as context measurement must focus on characterizing expectations through use of more formal predictive approaches as described, leading to a replacement of gross characterisations of complicated systems by qualifiers such as greater flexibility by meaningful terms derived from a systems engineering approach. 2 More computers, less staff equals efficiency Guardian, 6th January 2005 HP FET Workshop 31 st January 2006 page 4 of 4