Annex 5. Determination of the interference field strength in the Land Mobile Service

Similar documents
Rec. ITU-R P RECOMMENDATION ITU-R P PROPAGATION BY DIFFRACTION. (Question ITU-R 202/3)

Harmonized. Calculation. Method. for. Mobile Services (HCM-MS)

Propagation curves for aeronautical mobile and radionavigation services using the VHF, UHF and SHF bands

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R P Prediction of sky-wave field strength at frequencies between about 150 and khz

PART 1 RECOMMENDATION ITU-R P.1144 GUIDE TO THE APPLICATION OF THE PROPAGATION METHODS OF RADIOCOMMUNICATION STUDY GROUP 3

Propagation curves and conditions of validity (homogeneous paths)

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R P ATTENUATION IN VEGETATION. (Question ITU-R 202/3)

Supporting Network Planning Tools II

Study of Factors which affect the Calculation of Co- Channel Interference in a Radio Link

Groundwave Propagation, Part One

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R P Guide to the application of the propagation methods of Radiocommunication Study Group 3

Link Budget Calculation

Radio Propagation Fundamentals

Prediction of clutter loss

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R F.1819

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R SF.1719

Rec. ITU-R F RECOMMENDATION ITU-R F *

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R S.1341*

ARTICLE 22. Space services 1

Propagation Modelling White Paper

Propagation Mechanism

Rec. ITU-R P RECOMMENDATION ITU-R P *

ECC Recommendation (16)04

ERC Recommendation 54-01

COMPATIBILITY AND SHARING ANALYSIS BETWEEN DVB T AND TALKBACK LINKS IN BANDS IV AND V

Goodbye Rec. 370 Welcome Rec. 1546

Abstract. Propagation tests for land-mobile radio service

Technical Note: Path Align-R Wireless Supporting Information

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R SM.1268*

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R S.1340 *,**

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R BS * Ionospheric cross-modulation in the LF and MF broadcasting bands

ELEC 425 Interference Control in Electronics Lecture 7(a) Introduction to Antennas: Terminology

Point to point Radiocommunication

Method of measuring the maximum frequency deviation of FM broadcast emissions at monitoring stations. Recommendation ITU-R SM.

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R P * Propagation by diffraction

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R F *

Cellular Expert Radio Links module features

Earth Station Coordination

Range Considerations for RF Networks

Title: Test on 5.8 GHz Band Outdoor WiFi (802.11b/g) Wireless Base Station

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R S.1257

Application Note No. 7 Radio Link Calculations (Link_Calc.xls)

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R P Propagation data and prediction methods required for the design of terrestrial line-of-sight systems

Test specification: Section (e)(1), Radiated emissions below 40 GHz Test procedure: ANSI C63.4, Sections 8.3.2, 13.2, 13.4 Test mode: Compliance

Information on the Evaluation of VHF and UHF Terrestrial Cross-Border Frequency Coordination Requests

RADIO LINKS. Functionality chart

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R S *

The Radio Channel. COS 463: Wireless Networks Lecture 14 Kyle Jamieson. [Parts adapted from I. Darwazeh, A. Goldsmith, T. Rappaport, P.

Chapter 15: Radio-Wave Propagation

Revision of Lecture One

Terrain Reflection and Diffraction, Part One

ECC Report 276. Thresholds for the coordination of CDMA and LTE broadband systems in the 400 MHz band

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R SA.1628

Chapter 4 The RF Link

Electronic Communications Committee (ECC) within the European Conference of Postal and Telecommunications Administrations (CEPT)

Revision of Lecture One

DEVELOPMENT OF SOFTWARE FOR THE BASIC LINE-OF-SIGHT PARAMETERS CALCULATION

INTRODUCTION OF RADIO MICROPHONE APPLICATIONS IN THE FREQUENCY RANGE MHz

Mobile Radio Wave propagation channel- Path loss Models

Propagation prediction techniques and data required for the design of trans-horizon radio-relay systems

Notice of coordination procedure required under spectrum access licences for the 2.6 GHz band

Notice of aeronautical radar coordination. Coordination procedure for air traffic control radar - notice issued to 3.

Channel Modelling ETIM10. Propagation mechanisms

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R F.1402*, **

Atoll SPM (Standard Propagation Model) calibration guide

Antennas and Propagation. Chapter 5

The MYTHOLOGIES OF WIRELESS COMMUNICATION. Tapan K Sarkar

Antennas and Propagation. Chapter 5

Notion of propagation of radio waves

Intro to Radio Propagation,Antennas and Link Budget

AC Wire Carrier Current Devices (Unintentional Radiators)

Guide to the application of the propagation methods of Radiocommunication Study Group 3

Protection Ratio Calculation Methods for Fixed Radiocommunications Links

Evaluation of the Recommendation ITU-R P for UHF Field-Strength Prediction over Fresh-Water Mixed Paths

Atoll. SPM Calibration Guide. RF Planning and Optimisation Software. Version AT271_MCG_E2

1.2 ITU-R P.526 Principle

Characteristics of digital terrestrial television broadcasting systems in the frequency band MHz for frequency sharing/interference analysis

FCC ID: A3LSLS-BD106Q. Report No.: HCT-RF-1801-FC003. Plot Data for Output Port 2_QPSK 9 khz ~ 150 khz Middle channel 150 khz ~ 30 MHz Low channel

CEPT/ERC Recommendation ERC E (Funchal 1998)

Propagation prediction techniques and data required for the design of trans-horizon radio-relay systems

1. Terrestrial propagation

Session2 Antennas and Propagation

Method of measuring the maximum frequency deviation of FM broadcast emissions at monitoring stations

Using the epmp Link Budget Tool

ITU-R P Aeronautical Propagation Model Guide

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R M Reference radiation pattern for ship earth station antennas

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R P Attenuation in vegetation

Annex 3 B. Determination of the Masks Discrimination and the Net Filter Discrimination in the Fixed Service

Investigation of radio waves propagation models in Nigerian rural and sub-urban areas

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

Project = An Adventure : Wireless Networks. Lecture 4: More Physical Layer. What is an Antenna? Outline. Page 1

Publication X International Academy, Research and Industry Association (IARIA)

Fourth Year Antenna Lab

Antennas and Propagation

Module contents. Antenna systems. RF propagation. RF prop. 1

White Paper. 850 MHz & 900 MHz Co-Existence. 850 MHz Out-Of-Band Emissions Problem xxxx-xxxreva

Cellular Expert Professional module features

Neural Network Approach to Model the Propagation Path Loss for Great Tripoli Area at 900, 1800, and 2100 MHz Bands *

4G Coverage Obligation Notice of Compliance Verification Methodology. Statement

COMPATIBILITY BETWEEN NARROWBAND DIGITAL PMR/PAMR AND TACTICAL RADIO RELAY IN THE 900 MHz BAND. Cavtat, May 2003

Transcription:

Annex 5 Determination of the interference field strength in the Land Mobile Service

Annex 5, page 2 of 18 1 General 1.1 This calculation method is based on Recommendation ITU-R P.1546, taking into account aspects of frequency co-ordination. 1.2 When there is no obstacle within the 1st order Fresnel zone, the field strength shall be determined using the free-space attenuation. The formulas for calculating the Fresnel zone and the free-space field strength are contained in Appendix 1. 1.3 The interference field strength at the receiving location shall be determined using the propagation curves given in Annex 4. For signals with a transmitting to non-transmitting ratio of less than 1:10 and a cycle repetition time of more than 30 sec, the curves for 10 % of the time have to be applied (no continuous carrier). In other cases the 1% curves shall be used (continuous carrier). 1.4 For harmonized systems using harmonized spectrum only the 10 % curves have to be used. 2. Consideration of different interference situations In practice, different interference situations occur which call for different calculation methods. 2.1 A base station or a fixed station causes interference to another base station or fixed station In order to protect a base station or a fixed station from a new station to be installed in a neighbouring country, the interference field strength is determined in relation to the location of the radio station affected. 2.2 A base station or a fixed station causes interference to a mobile station In order to protect mobile stations from a base station or a fixed station, the interference field strength is determined in relation to the closest point on the edge of the area of operation of the mobile stations. 2.3 A mobile station causes interference to another mobile station In order to protect mobiles from each other, the interference field strength to be determined is calculated by means of the length of the propagation path between the points closest to the edges of the areas of operation of the mobile stations. 2.4 A mobile station causes interference to a base station or a fixed station In order to protect a base station or a fixed station from a mobile station, the interference field strength is determined in relation to the edge of the zone of operation of the mobile station closest to the location of the base station or the fixed station affected.

Annex 5, page 3 of 18 2.5 Assumed position of the mobile station As an exception to the provisions of 2.2, 2.3 and 2.4 in cases where the operation of a mobile station from a particular place of action causes or suffers from a higher interference field strength than from places at the edge of the zone of operation, the particular place of action shall be taken as the basis for calculation purposes. As an exception to the provisions of 2.2, 2.3 and 2.4, in cases where the radius of the zone of operation is cut by the borderline in the direction of the affected station, the position of the mobile is limited to the borderline. 3. Factors to be taken into consideration The accuracy with which the interference field strength at the receiving location is determined is largely dependent on the extent to which the actual conditions along the propagation path (via correction factors θ Tx, θ Rx, h) and the technical characteristics of the transmitter and receiver stations are taken into account. The accuracy when calculating the field strength increases with the attention paid to special conditions. To be able to provide reciprocity for calculations on propagation paths along sloping terrain, the profile used for further calculations is based on the connecting line between the terrain heights of the transmitter and the receiver location (normalized profile). The inter-dependence between the parameters θ and h1 is summarised in the following table. For the correction factor according to the clearance angle only negative values are applied. h eff Tx h eff Rx Use h Use normalized profile Use θtx Use θrx 3m 3m Y Y Y Y h1 = h eff Tx * h eff Rx / 10m 3m <3m Y Y Y Y h1 = h eff Tx * 0.3 <3m 3m Y Y Y Y h1 = h eff Rx * 0.3 <3m <3m Y Y Y Y h1 = 1m ML 3m Y Y N Y h1 = h m * h eff Rx / 10m ML <3m Y Y N Y h1 = h m * 0.3 3m ML Y Y Y N h1 = h m * h eff Tx / 10m <3m ML Y Y Y N h1 = h m * 0.3 ML ML Y Y N N h1 = h m Tx * h m Rx / 10m 3m coordination line Y N Y N h1 = h eff Tx * h2 / 10m <3m coordination line Y N Y N h1 = h2 * 0.3 ML coordination line N N N N h1 = h m * h2 / 10m where θ Tx Clearance angle at the transmitter site θ Rx Clearance angle at the receiver site h1 Effective antenna height for the curves in Annex 4 h eff Tx Effective antenna height of the transmitter h eff Rx Effective antenna height of the receiver h2 Receiver antenna height ML Mobile station (4D > 0) h m is taken from the input value for the mobile antenna height. If missing or less than 3 m it is set to 3 m. h1

Annex 5, page 4 of 18 The curves of Annex 4, which represent the interfering field strength values, apply to h1. The value of h1 is determined by using the previous table. A process of interpolation and extrapolation is given in Appendix 2. The following factors shall be taken into consideration 3.1 Terrain clearance angle If the terrain between the transmitter station and the receiving location is marked by ascents or descents, the interference field strength determined for the receiving location has to be corrected. The clearance angle (see Appendix 4) shall be determined for a maximum distance of 16 km. The correction factors for clearance angles in the range of 0 to +40 are given in Appendix 4. If the distance between transmitter and receiver is less than 16 km, the clearance angle correction factor will be determined according to the equation: = (d) * d / 16 (d): : d : correction factor due to clearance angle calculated for the distance between transmitter and receiver correction factor due to clearance angle distance between transmitter and receiver

Annex 5, page 5 of 18 3.2 Effective antenna height The effective height of an antenna h eff is defined as the height above the average terrain level in the range 1 to 15 km from the starting point in the direction of the end point: h eff = h n - h m where h eff = effective antenna height in m h n = physical height of the antenna above sea level in m h m = average height of the terrain in m The average height of the terrain h m is calculated by using the following equation: h m = 140 i=0 141 h i For h i, the heights at (1000 + i * 100) m from the starting point in the direction of the end point shall be taken. If the path from the starting point to the end point is shorter than 15 km, only height samples from d/15 to d are taken into account. 3.2.1 Effective antenna height of the transmitter The effective antenna height of a transmitter (h eff Tx ) is defined as the height above the average terrain level in the range defined in 3.2 from the transmitter in the direction of the receiver location. The effective antenna height of the transmitter has to be taken into account for calculating h1 (see table in 3).

Annex 5, page 6 of 18 3.2.2 Effective antenna height of the receiver The effective antenna height of a receiver (h eff Rx ) is defined as the height above the average terrain level in the range defined in 3.2 from the receiver in the direction of the transmitting location. The effective antenna height of the receiver has to be taken into account for calculating h1 (see table in 3). 3.3 Terrain irregularity h The irregularity of the terrain is defined as follows depending on the distance d between transmitter and receiver. Correction factors for the terrain irregularity shall not be applied to sea-path propagation paths. For d < 10 km: No terrain irregularity is taken into account for distances shorter than 10 km. For 10 km d 50 km: Terrain irregularity h Condition: 10 km d 50 km h 10 % 90 % 0 d 1 d 1 = 4.5 km d 4 = d - 4.5 km d 4 d

Annex 5, page 7 of 18 For d > 50 km: The irregularity of the terrain h is defined as the difference between the heights exceeded by 10 % and 90 % respectively of the terrain heights measured in the range 4.5 km to 25 km and in the range d - 25 km to d - 4.5 km from the transmitter in the direction of the receiving location. Terrain irregularity h Condition: d > 50 km 10 % h 90 % 0 d 1 d 2 d 3 d 1 = 4.5 km d 2 = 25 km d 3 = d - 25 km d 4 = d - 4.5 km d 4 The propagation curves for propagation paths over land are based on h = 50 m. If the measure of terrain irregularity deviates from h = 50 m, correction factors have to be applied to the interference field strengths derived from the propagation curves. The appropriate correction factors are given in Appendix 3. If the distance between transmitter and receiver is greater than 200 km, the value for d = 200 km is used. 3.4 Correction factors for frequencies Propagation curves, clearance angle corrections and terrain irregularity corrections apply only to the frequencies 100 MHz, 600 MHz and 2 GHz. For other frequencies, inter- or extrapolations according to Appendix 2 are required. 3.5 Antenna diagram If directional or tilted antennas are used as transmitting antennas at the interfering base station or fixed station, these factors shall be taken into account in the determination of the interference field strength. In case of directional antennas, the angle orientation is taken into account clockwise. If directional or tilted antennas are used as receiving antennas, the gain of the receiving antenna in the direction of the interference shall be subtracted from the maximum permissible interference field strength.

Annex 5, page 8 of 18 Annex 6 contains the diagrams of some typical directional antennas. These diagrams shall be used to derive the decrease of the maximum effective radiated power in relation to the receiving location or the reduction of the interference signal at the receiver. A method for combining the horizontal and vertical antenna patterns is given in Annex 8. 3.6 Mixed path propagation When paths occur over zones of different propagation characteristics, the following method is used which takes account of the different characteristics of the various parts of the path: a) For percentages of time < 10%, the following procedure for calculating the field strength for paths crossing a land/sea boundary is used: E m,t = E l,t + A (E s,t E l,t ) where Em,t field strength for mixed path for t% of the time El,t field strength for land path equal in length to the mixed path for t% of the time Es,t field strength for sea path equal in length to the mixed path for t% of the time A interpolation factor as given in the figure 1 Interpolation for mixed land/sea paths 0.8 Interpolation factor, A 0.6 0.4 5 % 1 % 0.2 FIGURE 30/P.370...[D30] = 13 CM 0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Fraction of path over sea b) For percentages of time > 10%, the following procedure is to be used:

Annex 5, page 9 of 18 di Em, t = E, dt i i t where: Em,t Field strength for mixed path for t% of time Ei,t di dt Field strength for path in zone i equal in length to the mixed path for t% of time Length of path in zone i and Length of total path.

Annex 5, page 10 of 18 Appendix 1 to Annex 5 Figure 1: Fresnel Zone Calculation of the first order Fresnel zone: Fresnel zone r ( x) 1 ( a x) λ x ( a x) 4 = x = 1.73 10 a f a λ represents the wavelength. The other symbols are depicted in Figure 1. All values are to be entered into the formulas as base units (paths in meters, the frequency f in Hertz). Calculation of the free space field strength ( 1kWerp) 107 db V/m 20 log d = µ (d in km) F free space 10

Annex 5, page 11 of 18 Appendix 2 to Annex 5 1. Inter- or extrapolation of field strength according to h 1 1.1 10m h 1 3000 m If h 1 has precisely one of the values of 10, 20, 37.5, 75, 150, 300, 600 or 1200 m, the field strength can be directly read off the curves in Annex 4. Otherwise the field strength has to be inter- or extrapolated according to the following formula: E = E inf + (E sup E inf ) log(h 1 / h inf ) / log (h sup / h inf ) where: h inf : 600 m if h 1 > 1200 m, otherwise the nearest nominal effective height below h 1 h sub : 1200 m if h 1 > 1200 m, otherwise the nearest nominal effective height above h 1 E inf : field strength for h inf at the required distance E sub : field strength for h sub at the required distance h 1 is limited to 3000 m, and the field strength is limited to the free space field strength. 1.2 0 m h 1 < 10 m The procedure for extrapolating field strength at a required distance d [km] for values of h 1 in the range 0 m to 10 m is based on smooth-earth horizon distances in km written as d H ( h) = 4. 1 h, where h is the required value of antenna height h 1 in meters. For d < d H (h 1 ) the field strength is given by the 10 m height curve at its horizon distance plus E, where E is the difference in field strength on the 10 m height curve at distances d and h 1 horizon distance. For d d H (h 1 ) the field strength is given by the 10 m height curve at distance d beyond its horizon distance, where d is the difference between d and the h 1 horizon distance. This may be expressed in the following formulae where E 10 (d) is the field strength in dbµv/m taken from the 10 m height curve for a distance d [km]: E = E 10 (d H (10)) + E 10 (d) E 10 (d H (h 1 )) dbµv/m d < d H (h 1 ) E = E 10 (d H (10) + d d H (h 1 )) dbµv/m d d H (h 1 ) If in the last equation d H (10) + d d H (h 1 ) exceeds 1000 km, even though d 1000 km, E 10 may be found from linear extrapolation for log(distance) of the curve, given by: E 10 = E inf + (E sup E inf ) log(d / D inf ) / log(d sup / D inf ) dbµv/m where: D inf : D sup : E inf : E sup : penultimate tabulation distance [km] final tabulation distance [km] field strength at penultimate tabulation distance [dbµv/m] field strength at final tabulation distance [dbµv/m]

Annex 5, page 12 of 18 2. Interpolation of field strength as a function of the distance The figures in Annex 4 show field strength plotted against distance d [km] in the range from 1 km to 1000 km. No interpolation for distance is needed if field strengths can be read directly from these graphs. For intermediate values of d, interpolation is required according to the following formula: E = E inf + (E sup E inf ) log(d / d inf ) / log(d sup / d inf ) dbµv/m where: d: distance for which the prediction is required d inf : nearest tabulation distance less than d d sup : nearest tabulation distance greater than d E inf : field strength value for d inf E sup : field strength value for d sup With d < 1 km, the free space field strength should be calculated. 3. Inter- or extrapolation of the field strength as a function of the frequency Field strength values for a given frequency have to be interpolated between the values for the nominal frequency values 100, 600 and 2000 MHz. In the case of frequencies below 100 MHz or above 2000 MHz, the interpolation must be replaced by an extrapolation from the two nearest nominal frequency values. The used formula is: E = E inf + (E sup E inf ) log(f / f inf ) / log(f sup / f inf ) dbµv/m where: f: frequency for which the prediction is required [MHz] f inf : lower nominal frequency (100 MHz if f < 100 MHz, 600 MHz if f > 2000 MHz) f sup : higher nominal frequency (600 MHz if f < 100 MHz, 2000 MHz if f > 2000 MHz) E inf : field strength value for f inf E sup : field strength value for f sup

Annex 5, page 13 of 18 Appendix 3 to Annex 5 Attenuation correction factor curves This Appendix contains the correction curves according to terrain irregularity h for frequencies 100 MHz (FIGURE 1), 600 MHz (FIGURE 2) and 2000 MHz (FIGURE 3).

Annex 5, page 14 of 18 Correction factors according to h [db] 100 MHz 600 MHz 2000 MHz h [m] 50 km 200 km 50 km 200 km 50 km 200 km 10-7.0-3.0-10.0-5.0-10.0-5.0 20-4.0-2.0-6.0-3.0-6.0-3.0 30-2.5-1.5-3.0-2.0-3.0-3.0 50 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 80 3.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 5.0 2.5 100 5.0 3.0 7.0 3.5 8.7 4.3 150 8.0 4.5 10.0 5.0 12.4 6.2 300 14.0 7.0 20.0 10.0 24.8 12.4 500 19.0 9.5 28.0 13.0 34.7 16.1

Annex 5, page 15 of 18 Inter- or extrapolation of the correction factor according to terrain irregularity as a function of the frequency The correction factor according to terrain irregularity for a given frequency has to be interpolated between the values of the nominal frequency values 100, 600 and 2000 MHz. In the case of frequencies below 100 MHz or above 2000 MHz, the interpolation must be replaced by an extrapolation from the two nearest nominal frequency values. The used formula is: C = C inf + (C sup C inf ) log(f / f inf ) / log(f sup / f inf ) dbµv/m where: f: frequency for which the correction factor is required [MHz] f inf : lower nominal frequency (100 MHz if f < 100 MHz, 600 MHz if f > 2000 MHz) f sup : higher nominal frequency (600 MHz if f < 100 MHz, 2000 MHz if f > 2000 MHz) C inf : correction factor according to terrain irregularity for f inf C sup : correction factor according to terrain irregularity for f sup

Annex 5, page 16 of 18 Appendix 4 to Annex 5 Terrain clearance angle correction factor θ p o s i t i v e θ Antenna height above ground min (16km, d) θ n e g a t i v e Antenna height above ground θ FIGURE 1: Terrain Clearance Angle FIGURE 2: Terrain Clearance Angle Correction

Annex 5, page 17 of 18 Figure 2 is only for information. The correction according to the terrain clearance angle should be calculated as follows: For distances greater than or equal to 16 km For 100 MHz the equation is: 2 Correction = 9.1-6.9 + 20 log ( v - 0.1) + 1 + v 0. 1 v = 37.2* θ θ (rad), with limiting values of 0 db at small angles and -32 db at 40 degrees. For 600 MHz the equation is: 2 Correction = 13.1 6.9 + 20log ( v 0.1) + 1 + v 0. 1 v = 91.2* θ θ (rad), with limiting values of 0 db at small angles and -35 db at 40 degrees. For 2000 MHz the equation is: 2 Correction = 17.3 6.9 + 20log ( v 0.1) + 1 + v 0. 1 v = 167* θ θ (rad), with limiting values of 0 db at small angles and -36 db at 40 degrees. For distances up to 16 km: Correction = correction calculated above * d / 16 km.

Annex 5, page 18 of 18 Inter- or extrapolation of the terrain clearance angle correction as a function of the frequency Terrain clearance angle correction for a given frequency has to be interpolated between the values for the nominal frequency values 100, 600 and 2000 MHz. In the case of frequencies below 100 MHz or above 2000 MHz, the interpolation must be replaced by an extrapolation from the two nearest nominal frequency values. The used formula is: TCA_c = TCA_c inf + (TCA_c sup TCA_c inf ) / log(f / f inf ) log(f sup / f inf ) db where: f: frequency for which the prediction is required [MHz] f inf : lower nominal frequency (100 MHz if f < 100 MHz, 600 MHz if f > 2000 MHz) f sup : higher nominal frequency (600 MHz if f < 100 MHz, 2000 MHz if f > 2000 MHz) TCA_c inf : terrain clearance angle correction for f inf TCA_c sup : terrain clearance angle correction for f sup