CHOICE OF MV FEEDER BIL TO MAXIMIZE QOS AND MINIMIZE EQUIPMENT FAILURE

Similar documents
In order to minimise distribution (11 and 22 kv) feeder breaker

Utility System Lightning Protection

Electricity Supply to Africa and Developing Economies. Challenges and opportunities. Technology solutions and innovations for developing economies

LIGHTNING OVERVOLTAGES AND THE QUALITY OF SUPPLY: A CASE STUDY OF A SUBSTATION

High voltage engineering

Session Four: Practical Insulation Co-ordination for Lightning Induced Overvoltages

What is the Value of a Distribution Arrester

PREVENTING FLASHOVER NEAR A SUBSTATION BY INSTALLING LINE SURGE ARRESTERS

ANALYSIS OF A FLASHOVER OPERATION ON TWO 138KV TRANSMISSION LINES

Analysis of lightning performance of 132KV transmission line by application of surge arresters

The Many Uses of Transmission Line Arresters

MODIFICATION OF THE ARRESTER ARRANGEMENT WHEN CONVERTING THE METHOD OF NEUTRAL TREATMENT

ABSTRACT 1.0 INTRODUCTION LIST OF SYMBOLS

Lightning performance of a HV/MV substation

ABSTRACTS of SESSION 6

INSTALLATION OF LSA ON A 400 KV DOUBLE-CIRCUIT LINE IN RUSSIA

The line-lightning performance and mitigation studies of shielded steelstructure

PRACTICAL PROBLEMS WITH SUBSTATION EARTHING

Journal of Asian Scientific Research SUBSTATION PROTECTION AND THE CLIMATIC ENVIRONMENT OF NIGER DELTA. John Tarilanyo Afa

B2-301 IMPROVING DOUBLE CIRCUIT TRANSMISSION LINE RELIABILITY THROUGH LIGHTNING DESIGN

When surge arres t ers are installed close to a power transformer, overvoltage TRANSFORMER IN GRID ABSTRACT KEYWORDS

Insulation Co-ordination For HVDC Station

Computer Based Model for Design Selection of Lightning Arrester for 132/33kV Substation

IMP/007/011 - Code of Practice for the Application of Lightning Protection

Protection against unacceptable voltages in railway systems

A Case Study on Selection and Application of Lightning Arrester and Designing its Suitable Grounding Grid

HIGH VOLTAGE Insulation Coordination

Lightning overvoltage and protection of power substations

Fundamentals of Power Quality

ABSTRACT 1 INTRODUCTION

2 Grounding of power supply system neutral

SURGE ARRESTERS AND TESTING. Keith Hill Doble Engineering Company

Webinar: An Effective Arc Flash Safety Program

Protection Basics Presented by John S. Levine, P.E. Levine Lectronics and Lectric, Inc GE Consumer & Industrial Multilin

TECHNICAL NOTE 2.0. Overvoltages origin and magnitudes Overvoltage protection

Lightning Protection of Distribution Substations by Using Metal Oxide Gapless Surge Arresters Connected in Parallel

Introduction to Harmonics and Power Quality

7P Series - Surge Protection Device (SPD) Features 7P P P

3. (a) List out the advantages and disadvantages of HRC fuse (b) Explain fuse Characteristics in detail. [8+8]

thepower to protect the power to protect i-gard LITERATURE Low and medium voltage

Modeling of overhead transmission lines with line surge arresters for lightning overvoltages. Poland

Problems connected with Commissioning of Power Transformers

Calculation of Transient Overvoltages by using EMTP software in a 2-Phase 132KV GIS

Effect of Surge Arrester on Overhead Transmission Lines as Shield against Over Voltage

EXPERIMENTAL ISSUES OF OVERVOLTAGE COORDINATION

EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT SOLUTIONS OF FAULTED PHASE EARTHING TECHNIQUE FOR AN EARTH FAULT CURRENT LIMITATION

10. DISTURBANCE VOLTAGE WITHSTAND CAPABILITY

The Lightning Event. White Paper

Transmission of Electrical Energy

Computation of Lightning Impulse Backflashover Outages Rates on High Voltage Transmission Lines

Earthing of Electrical Devices and Safety

Power Quality and Reliablity Centre

APPLICATION OF LONG FLASHOVER ARRESTERS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF LIGHTNING PROTECTION AND OPERATING VOLTAGE RELIABILITY OF DISTRIBUTION LINES

DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK SUBJECT CODE & NAME : EE 1402 HIGH VOLTAGE ENGINEERING UNIT I

Tab 8 Surge Arresters

Lightning phenomena and its effect on transmission line

ROEVER ENGINEERING COLLEGE ELAMBALUR, PERAMBALUR DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING

Towards a transient earth fault clearing scheme for medium voltage networks

X International Symposium on Lightning Protection

Effect of Shielded Distribution Cables on Lightning-Induced Overvoltages in a Distribution System

Lightning Flashover Rate of an Overhead Transmission Line Protected by Surge Arresters

WORLD MEETING ON LIGHTNING Lightning Performance Research on Mexican High Voltage Transmission Lines

Education & Training

Analysis of current distribution among long-flashover arresters for 10 kv overhead line protection against direct lightning strikes

Modeling insulation in high-voltage substations

The Effect of Lightning Parameters on Induced Voltages Caused by Nearby Lightning on Overhead Distribution Conducting Line.

Lightning Protection: History and Modern Approaches

Pre location: Impulse-Current-Method (ICE)

Insulation Coordination Fundamentals Where Arrester and Insulator Characteristics Meet

A TECHNICAL REVIEW ON CAPACITOR BANK SWITCHING WITH VACUUM CIRCUIT BREAKERS

AMENDMENT NO. 1 SEPTEMBER IS (Part 1) : 2001/IEC (1991) SURGE ARRESTORS

Topic 6 Quiz, February 2017 Impedance and Fault Current Calculations For Radial Systems TLC ONLY!!!!! DUE DATE FOR TLC- February 14, 2017

Coordination of surge arresters in DC 3 kv railway traction system field tests

LIGHTNING PROTECTION for BROADCASTING STATIONS

MAHALAKSHMI ENGINEERING COLLEGE

A Review Comprehension: Guideline for Testing of HV, EHV and UHV Substation Equipment

2. Current interruption transients

VFTO STUDIES DUO TO THE SWITCHING OPERATION IN GIS 132KV SUBSTATION AND EFFECTIVE FACTORS IN REDUCING THESE OVER VOLTAGES

Tab 2 Voltage Stresses Switching Transients

LIGHTNING PROTECTION for RADIO COMMUNICATION SITES

CIGRE C4 Colloquium on Lightning and Power System, Kuala Lumpur, May, Establishment of a new lightning location system in Croatia

Great Northern Transmission Line: Behind the (Electrical) Design

The impact of distributed generation to the lightning protection of modern distribution lines

Simulation and Analysis of Lightning on 345-kV Arrester Platform Ground-Leading Line Models

A Study on Lightning Overvoltage Characteristics of Grounding Systems in Underground Distribution Power Cables

Single Line Diagram of Substations

Lightning Performance Improvement of 115 kv and 24 kv Circuits by External Ground in MEA s Distribution System

The Variable Threshold Neutral Isolator (VTNI)

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SWITCHING OF MOTORS & GENERATORS WITH VACUUM TECHNOLOGY

In-Service Testing and Diagnosis of Gapless Metal Oxide Surge Arresters According to IEC

Lightning test in lab. Symmetrical fault and protection. Olof Samuelsson

Lightning transient analysis in wind turbine blades

G. KOEPPL Koeppl Power Experts Switzerland

SCHEME OF COURSE WORK ( ) Electrical & Electronics Engineering. Electrical machines-i, II and power transmission engineering

WIRELESS INSULATOR POLLUTION MONITORING SYSTEM

Effect of High Frequency Cable Attenuation on Lightning-Induced Overvoltages at Transformers

POWER TRANSFORMER SPECIFICATION, DESIGN, QUALITY CONTROL AND TESTING 18 MARCH 2009

Electromagnetic Shielding Analysis of Buildings Under Power Lines Hit by Lightning

Analysis of MOV Surge Arrester Models by using Alternative Transient Program ATP/EMTP

MV network design & devices selection EXERCISE BOOK

Transcription:

CHOICE OF MV FEEDER BIL TO MAXIMIZE QOS AND MINIMIZE EQUIPMENT FAILURE Willem DIRKSE VAN SCHALKWYK ESKOM - South Africa vschalwj@eskom.co.za ABSTRACT A high BIL (300 kv) on a MV feeder ensures that no backflashovers occur due to indirect strikes (lightning that does not terminate on the line itself). This results in the possibility of high surge voltages and currents on the feeder that can excessive equipment failures. In many cases the BIL is increased by using wood as part of the insulation. Direct strikes (lightning that does terminate on the line itself) can damage the wood and this can result in pole failure and electrocutions. According to calculation, a lower BIL (150 kv) may result in a small increase in the number of backflashovers due to indirect strikes. Continuous measurements over 6 years revealed that no flashovers occurred due to indirect strikes on a test feeder. This paper investigated an optimal BIL in favour of both acceptable Quality of Supply (QOS)(in particular voltage dips) and acceptable Network performance (interruption of service to customers). Attention was also given to making a pole mount installation lightning proof. INTRODUCTION In some Eskom MV networks, up to 78% of equipment failures have been attributed to lightning. In the case of MV feeders, the insulation to earth typically consists of a 150 kv Basic Insulation Level (BIL) insulator in series with a 150 kv BIL wood gap on the bonded wood-pole [1] as shown in Figure 1. The wood also provides some power frequency arc quenching properties [2]. The 300 kv BIL philosophy was implemented to ensure that no indirect lightning strikes d a -to-earth flashover. Unfortunately, the higher the BIL, the higher the amplitude of the voltage and current lightning surges on the feeders and this s fuse, surge arrester and transformer failures during lightning storms. Direct strikes will a flashover across the wood gap and this will very often split the wood as shown in Figure 2. The pole-mounted supply points are an integral part of the feeder and the most optimal configuration and protection of the equipment was established. It has been found that MV drop-out fuses cannot be graded for both lightning and power frequency [3] and for that reason nuisance fusing during storms or incorrect protection operation during equipment occurred frequently. Due to practical reasons, blown surge John VAN COLLER University of the Witwatersrand - South Africa John.VanColler@wits.ac.za arresters were not always replaced promptly and the polemounted transformer became unprotected against lightning during that time. A new design in the polemount transformer configuration has resulted in eliminating safety risks (work at heights and in close proximity to high voltages) when changing distribution surge arresters. The transformers and fuses are also protected against lightning even after the arrester has failed. Furthermore nuisance fuse failures and protection grading are also addressed. Future research will include measurements on a 22 kv feeder to determine the most optimal choice of BIL. Figure 1. MV pole top configuration Figure 2. Wood damage due to lightning and leakage currents CIRED 2015 1/5

THE LIGHTNING THREAT TO MV FEEDERS The objective of the study was to minimize the BIL of unshielded MV feeders up to the point where on the feeder initiated by indirect strikes are limited to single figures annually. The advantage will be that the amplitudes of the surges on the feeders are reduced, resulting in less equipment (surge arrester, fuse and transformer) failures. Secondly, should it be possible to use the insulator only to provide the BIL, the rest of the structure can be fully galvanically bonded and earthed, avoiding wood-pole damage such as wood splitting and power frequency leakage current causing pole-top fires. A study was done over 6 years on feeders with the BIL varying between 150 kv and 300 kv. The polarity of GPS time-stamped recorded lightning surges on a 22kV feeder were matched with Lightning Detection Network (LDN) data to determine whether the strikes were direct or indirect. The LDN consist of 23 sensors and has a specified geographical accuracy of a 500m radius for a 90% detection rate. The average (over 6 years) lightning ground flash density across the feeder was 7.9 ground flashes/km²/year. Part of the study also showed that many power frequency fault arcs were quenched before any breaker operation. Figure 3. Pole-mount installation configuration. Both lightning surge current and power frequency current flows through the fuse. Measurement circuit A Class 4 QOS logger was installed on the line side of the GAKG 22 kv overhead MV feeder breaker. A resistor divider was used for voltage measurements while the breaker s CTs were used for power frequency current measurements. A capacitor divider was also installed in parallel with the resistor divider to verify that it did not filter out high frequencies. Figure 4 shows the layout of the measurement circuit. INFORMATION ON STUDY Test feeder The Ganspan Kgomotso (GAKG) test feeder is 156 km long and supplies 5 small towns (total of 4350 customers) and 158 agricultural (irrigation) customers. A total of 372 pole-mounted transformers are connected to the GAKG feeder. Pole-mount transformers The pole-mount installation configuration is shown in Figure 3. Both the lightning surge current and the power frequency current flow though the fuse. The fuse cannot be graded for both currents. A higher fuse rating results in less nuisance fuse failures due to lightning, but then the fuse cannot be graded to isolate faulty installations before the Sensitive Earth Fault (SEF) protection operates. Figure 4. The measurement circuit at the substation ANALYSIS OF MEASUREMENT DATA Differentiation between direct and indirect strikes An indirect strike is defined as any strike to a distant object within 1 km of the feeder. Only those indirect strikes that had both a high amplitude and were very close to the feeder produced an induced voltage surge that could be seen on the voltage logger. The rest of the CIRED 2015 2/5

indirect strikes within 1 km of the line were however still captured on the LDN. The current and voltage waveforms were measured continuously. If there was a disturbance in the waveform, it was analysed to determine the. When a match with the LDN data was found, the polarity of the strike was compared with the polarity of the first half-cycle of the measured lightning voltage surge. Should the polarity be the same, it meant that it was a direct strike if not, it was an indirect strike. The waveforms of the voltages and currents showed whether the lightning surge current was followed by a power frequency fault current. SCADA data was used to verify any breaker operations d by a subsequent power frequency fault current. Some direct-to-feeder flashes did not result in breaker operation. In these cases the power frequency fault current arc was quenched before any breaker operated as shown in Figure 5. vicinity of the test feeder over the past 6 years. Most of them were too far from the feeder to a noticeable surge on the feeder. None of them d insulation breakdown. Table 1. A summary of the d by lightning on the GAKG feeder. All indirect flashes within 1 km of the feeder were tabled. Year ending in February DIRECT FLASHES Phase to Single Did not INDIRECT FLASHES Phase to Single Did not 2009 15 0 18 0 0 1603 2010 34 9 9 0 0 2062 2011 30 2 28 0 0 1983 2012 26 3 14 0 0 2471 2013 14 0 22 0 0 1091 2014 7 1 11 0 0 887 A particular case where a negative 120 ka strike terminated 15 m from the feeder (Figure 6) where the BIL was 180 kv was analysed. The induced voltage can be calculated as: Um = (1 + v c 2 (v c) 2) (h I p ) 1 d Figure 5. An example of arc quenching before breaker operation Results No incident could be found where an indirect flash d insulation breakdown on the test feeder as shown in Erreur! Source du renvoi introuvable.. During the 6 year period, 62% of the single- and 39% of the - quenched. According to [2], the wood path can assist in quenching arcs up to 20 A. The minimum AC fault current that was quenched, was 80 A rms and the average was 179 A rms. According to these values, no contribution to arc quenching would have been made by the wood path. High amplitude strikes A study was done to determine the effect of all flashes with strikes above 65 ka in a buffer zone within 1 km of the feeder as shown in Table 2. The specific interest was to ensure that no high amplitude indirect strikes close to the feeder were missed. There were 11 strikes between 120 ka and 179 ka in the - where v is the speed of the travelling wave in m/s, c is the speed of light in m/s, h is the height of the feeder in m, I p is the lightning amplitude in A and d is the distance between the strike and the feeder in m. Adding values for the specific case: Um = (1 + 108 3 10 8 (10 120 2) 2 (10 8 3 10 8 15 ) ) = 2.98 MV However, there were surge arresters 100 m away from the point where the induced voltage was measured. The surge voltage on the line will then be: IZ 0 V = (V IR + L ) 2 c 2t f - where V IR is the surge arrester voltage discharge level in V, L is the length of line section in m, c is the speed of light in m/s, I is the induced current in A, Z 0 is the line surge impedance in Ohms and t f is the surge rise time in s. Substituting the values in equation 2, results in an induced voltage of: V = (40 + 100 7.4 400 3 10 8 2 5.3 10 6) = 133.7kV The surge arresters that were close prevented a flashover CIRED 2015 3/5

in this case. This was the case in all such incidents in the past 6 years. Figure 6. A -120 ka strike terminated 15 m from the feeder. Table 2. A total of 72 strikes above 65 ka were recorded along the feeder. Direct strike = 8 Indirect strikes = 55 Line out Resulted in Did not any Resulted in Did not any 7 1 0 55 9 Line not energized at time of strike According to [2], a wood path can also prevent a power frequency arc follow through d by a lightning strike. However these tests were only done for lightning currents up to 3500 A. All the strikes direct to the GAKG feeder were more than 3.5 ka and would therefore not have applied to this research. Should the feeder s BIL be lowered to 150 kv, it is possible that the amount of flashovers might increase from 40.5 by an additional 5.06 flashovers. According to the measurements, 42% of these flashovers will quench before breaker operation. It will be acceptable to have only about 3 additional flashovers annually for the benefit of much smaller lightning surge voltage and current amplitudes and less equipment failures. Pole mount transformer configuration A Combi unit was designed. A failed arrester drops out and then the fuse opens as well. Subsequent strikes will flash over to earth while in the process of replacing the broken arrester. Both transformer and fuse are therefore protected against lightning. Fuse grading challenges with protection were also addressed. Both the arrester and the fuse can be replaced safely from ground level. PROPOSED WAY FORWARD BIL of feeder Direct strikes to the GAKG feeder should a total of 121.6 flashovers annually according to Equation 3 [5]. N s = N g (28H 0.6 + w) L 10 3 3 - where Ng is the average ground flash density (7.9) in ground flashes/km -2 /year, w is the line width (1.2 m) in the absence of shield wires in m, L is the line length (156 km) in km and H is the average tower height (8 m) in m. Figure 7. Flashover rate for different BIL standards There were on average 40.5 flashovers annually over the 6 year period of which only 23.5 resulted in breaker operation. This may have been due to significant shielding by trees in the vicinity of the feeder and requires further investigation. For the GAKG feeder with length of 156 km, ground flash density of 8 ground flashes/km²/year, 10% of the line insulated at 180 kv and 90 % at 300 kv, 5.06 flashovers should have occurred annually along the feeder due to indirect strikes as seen in Figure 7 [4]. No flashover occurred due to indirect strikes to the GAKG feeder and it could possibly be due to surge arresters and other equipment that were always in close proximity of the indirect strikes. Figure 8. The Combi unit to protect the transformer and fuse after surge arrester failure. CIRED 2015 4/5

CONCLUSION Based on the actual measurements of induced voltages on the feeder, the BIL of the feeder could possibly be lowered. It would be beneficial to lower the feeder BIL to a level (150 kv) where no unprotected wood is present. This will eliminate wood damage and will lower the surge energy and voltage amplitudes. Equipment on polemount installations, will benefit significantly. REFERENCES [1] H. Geldenhuys, C. Gaunt and A. Britten, Insulation co-ordination of unshielded distribution lines from 1 kv to 36 kv, Johannesburg: SAIEE publication. [2] M. Darveniza, Electrical properties of wood and line design, University of Queenland Press, 1980. [3] W. Dirkse van Schalkwyk, "The placing of line surge arresters and fuses on 11 kv and 22 kv lines to protect equipment against lightning," M Eng Thesis, pp. 3,79, March 2001. [4] IEEE Std 1410-2010, "IEEE Guide for Improving the Lightning Performance of Electric Power Overhead Distribution lines," IEEE, 2010. [5] A. Eriksson, "The incidence of lightning strikes to power lines, IEEE/PES Winter Meeting," New York, February 1986. CIRED 2015 5/5