NARUC. Summer Committee Meetings. Staff Subcommittees on Electricity & Electric Reliability

Similar documents
Frequency Response Initiative Industry Advisory Generator Governor Frequency Response

Robert W. Cummings - NERC Director of System Analysis and Reliability Initiatives William Herbsleb - Chairman of Frequency Response Standard Drafting

Frequency Response Characteristic Survey Training Document

Table of Contents Error! Bookmark not defined.

Minutes Frequency Response Initiative Meeting

generation greater than 75 MVA (gross aggregate nameplate rating) Generation in the ERCOT Interconnection with the following characteristics:

Harmonizing the Changing Resource Mix Keeping the Grid Together

Lessons Learned in Model Validation for NERC Compliance

Frequency Response Standard Background Document November, 2012

Demonstration of PFR Improvement September ERCOT Operations Planning

Procedure for ERO Support of Frequency Response and Frequency Bias Setting Standard. Event Selection Process

Reliability Guideline: Generating Unit Operations During Complete Loss of Communications

Reliability Guideline: Generating Unit Operations During Complete Loss of Communications

Forward Looking Frequency Trends Technical Brief ERS Framework 1 Measures 1, 2, and 4: Forward Looking Frequency Analysis

Using Synchrophasors for Frequency Response Analysis in the Western Interconnection. Bonneville Power Administration -- WECC JSIS Chair

AORC Technical meeting 2014

Standard BAL Frequency Response and Frequency Bias Setting

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Frequency Response Initiative Report

NPCC Regional Reliability Reference Directory # 12. Underfrequency Load Shedding Program Requirements

Standard Development Timeline

Lessons Learned in Model Validation for NERC Compliance

Texas Reliability Entity Event Analysis. Event: May 8, 2011 Loss of Multiple Elements Category 1a Event

BAL Standard Project Frequency Response and Frequency Bias Setting Industry Webinar

11/4/2013. NERC RS Meeting October 28, 2013 Sullivan s Island, SC. Troy Blalock SERC NERC RS Representative

Reference Document Balancing Authority Area Footprint Change Tasks

1200 MW Fault Induced Solar Photovoltaic Resource Interruption Disturbance Report

Standard PRC Generator Frequency and Voltage Protective Relay Settings. A. Introduction. See the Implementation Plan for PRC

Alberta Reliability Standard Frequency Response and Frequency Bias Setting BAL-003-AB-1.1

Frequency Response Standard Whitepaper

NORTH CAROLINA INTERCONNECTION REQUEST. Utility: Designated Contact Person: Address: Telephone Number: Address:

Endorsed Assignments from ERS Framework

NERC Training Document Understand and Calculate Frequency Response

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Final ballot January BOT adoption February 2015

Industry Webinar. Reactive Power Planning. NERC System Analysis and Modeling Subcommittee (SAMS) March 2017

Informational Filing, Frequency Response Annual Analysis Docket No. RM

Recently, the SS38 Working Group on Inter-Area Dynamic Analysis completed two study reports on behalf of the UFLS Regional Standard Drafting Team.

Standard PRC Generator Frequency and Voltage Protective Relay Settings. A. Introduction

2018 Frequency Response Annual Analysis

VOLTAGE STABILITY OF THE NORDIC TEST SYSTEM

Standard MOD Verification of Models and Data for Generator Excitation Control System or Plant Volt/Var Control Functions

Step-Response Tests of a Unit at Atatürk Hydro Power Plant and Investigation of the Simple Representation of Unit Control System

Lecture 15 EMS Application II Automatic Generation Contol. Davood Babazadeh

Market mechanisms for frequency control

IDAHO PURPA GENERATOR INTERCONNECTION REQUEST (Application Form)

PJM Regulation Study Update

Informational Filing, Frequency Response Annual Analysis Docket No. RM

Document C-29. Procedures for System Modeling: Data Requirements & Facility Ratings. January 5 th, 2016 TFSS Revisions Clean Open Process Posting

Keeping it up to Speed Off-Nominal Frequency Operations. CETAC 2018 San Ramon

Informational Filing Regarding 2017 Frequency Response Annual Analysis Report Docket No. RM

Issued: September 2, 2014 Effective: October 3, 2014 WN U-60 Attachment C to Schedule 152, Page 1 PUGET SOUND ENERGY

Integration of Wind Generation into Weak Grids

Standard BAL b Automatic Generation Control

Industry Webinar Draft Standard

EH2741 Communication and Control in Electric Power Systems Lecture 2

Grainger CEME/IEEE Workshop Technology Roadmap for Large Electrical Machines

Table of Contents. NERC 2016 Frequency Response Annual Analysis September 2016 ii

NERC Protection Coordination Webinar Series June 23, Phil Tatro

Standard Development Timeline

2015 Frequency Response Annual Analysis

EASTERN ILLINI ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE Application for Operation of Member-Owned Generation

Standard BAL b Automatic Generation Control

Standard MOD Verification of Models and Data for Generator Excitation Control Sys tem or Plant Volt/Var Control Functions

Operational Modeling and Model Inputs

SDG&E Transmission Synchrophasor Project Update

Geomagnetic Disturbances. IEEE PES Chicago Chapter Technical Presentation March 12, Alan Engelmann Transmission Planning ComEd.

Post-Event Analysis of a Compound Event in the ERCOT System Using Synchrophasor Data

EE 742 Power System Components. Y. Baghzouz ECE Department UNLV

VAR Generator Operation for Maintaining Network Voltage Schedules

BPS-Connected Inverter-Based Resource Performance

Owner/Customer Name: Mailing Address: City: County: State: Zip Code: Phone Number: Representative: Address: Fax Number:

Agenda Item 3h Attachment 9

Shell Trading Gas and Power Company General Manager Regulatory Affairs, December 2, 2002 to Present

VAR Outreach Presentation

Phasor-based wide area monitoring in the South African power system

Calculating and Using Reporting ACE in a Tie Line Bias Control Program

Final ballot January BOT adoption February 2015

Advantages and Disadvantages of EHV Automatic Reclosing

The Use of VSC-Based BtB as Grid Shock Absorber

Load frequency control of interconnected system

Transmission Interconnection Requirements for Inverter-Based Generation

OPERATING PROCEDURE. Table of Contents

Setting and Verification of Generation Protection to Meet NERC Reliability Standards

A New Approach Applied to Adaptive Centralized Load Shedding Scheme

METERING REQUIREMENTS FOR INTERCONNECTION POINTS OF SERVICE

LOAD FREQUENCY CONTROL FOR A TWO-AREA INTERCONNECTED POWER SYSTEM BY USING SLIDING MODE CONTROLLER

Reducing the Effects of Short Circuit Faults on Sensitive Loads in Distribution Systems

Forced Oscillation Event Analysis

Standard BAL b3 Automatic GenerationBalancing Authority Control DRAFT

Knowledge-based Adaptive Frequency Control of Gas Turbine Generator Model for Multi-machine Power System

System Protection and Control Subcommittee

Reliability Guideline Integrating Reporting ACE with the NERC Reliability Standards

Proposed Language in BAL-003-1/Comments New Standard or Other Action R1. Each Balancing Authority shall This. Attachment A.

Table 1 - Assignment of BA Obligations... 8

VAR Generator Operation for Maintaining Network Voltage Schedules

CHAPTER 4 LOAD FREQUENCY CONTROL OF INTERCONNECTED HYDRO-THERMAL SYSTEM

Time over/underfrequency relay with protection assemblies

Success Story: Practical Use of Synchrophasor Technology in ISO-NE Operations

Southern Company Interconnection Requirements for Inverter-Based Generation

Transcription:

NARUC Summer Committee Meetings Staff Subcommittees on Electricity & Electric Reliability

NARUC Summer Committee Meetings Agenda 10:00-11:00 am Tour of the Newtown Creek Biodigester Plant 1:00 2:00 pm Frequency Response Decline in the Eastern Interconnect Troy Blalock, South Carolina Electric & Gas Co. 2:00 2:15 pm Update on the Cause of the April 7, 2015 Outage in Washington DC. David Souder, PJM

Newtown Creek Egg Biodigester Plant, Manhattan New York

NARUC Summer Committee Meetings Frequency Response Decline in the Eastern Interconnect

NARUC Summer Committee Meetings Troy Blaylock, Power System Reliability Specialist South Carolina Electric & Gas Co.

Frequency Response Initiative NARUC Staff Subcommittee on Electricity and Electric Reliability Troy Blalock South Carolina Electric and Gas NERC Resource Subcommittee Vice Chairman July 12, 2015

Agenda Why Primary Frequency Response is Important Define Primary Frequency Response Discuss the NERC Advisory Generator Governor Frequency Discuss the Identified Issues Next Steps Questions 7

Why Primary Frequency Response Is Important Essential for Reliability of the Interconnections Cornerstone for system stability Line of defense to prevent Under Frequency Load Shedding(UFLS) Prevent equipment damage Essential for System Restoration Droop response is critical in restoration efforts Hydro units and gas turbines are some of the first units to be restarted Compliance with NERC Standards BAL-003-1, BAL-001 Prevent future regulations related to generator frequency response performance To accurately predict system events (Transmission Models) 8

Frequency 9

Primary Frequency Response Primary Frequency Response is the actions to arrest and stabilize frequency in response to locally detected frequency deviations. Primary Response comes from generator governor response, load response (motors) and other devices that provide immediate response based on local (devicelevel) control. Generator Governor Response within 0-10 seconds.. Washington, DC Outage Frequency Point A is the frequency prior to the event Frequency Point C is the nadir or lowest point Frequency Point B is the settling frequency 10

Classic Frequency Excursion Recovery 11

Frequency Response Control Logic Generator Response Generator turbine governors either mechanically or electronically control the primary control valves to the turbine. Steam, Water or Fuel is what is regulated. Graphic from GE info bulletin PSIB20150212 12

Present Interconnection Profiles East 13

Current Interconnection Profiles 14

MW / 0.1 Hz Decline in Eastern Interconnection Frequency Response Eastern Interconnection Mean Primary Frequency Response 4,000 3,500 Source 1994-2009: J. Ingleson & E. Allen, "Tracking the Eastern Interconnection Frequency Governing Characteristic" presented at 2010 IEEE PES. Source 2010-2011: Daily Automated Reliability Reports * 1999 Data Interpolated * 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 15 Year

Present Eastern Interconnection Frequency Response Lazy L Profile 16

Generator Governor Frequency Response Advisory Advisory issued February 5th Initiated by NERC Resource Subcommittee Interconnections frequency response has declined Eastern Interconnection Lazy L profile 2010 and 2013 Generator Survey Data Generator Governor Frequency Response Advisory 17

What Has Been Learned: 1) Dead Bands Exceed Recommendations Dead Bands Vary Most exceed 36 mhz or 2.16 RPM Large amount of responses reported they did not know Most settings result in NO governor response unless catastrophic event NERC Frequency Response Initiative Report - August 2012, Bob Cummings 18

What Has Been Learned: 2) Unit Response is Squelched or Withdrawn Coordination with plant Distributed Control System (DCS) is essential when operating in MW Set Point Coordinated Control. 19 Graphic from GE info bulletin PSIB20150212

Missing Example Frequency 60.000 Hz 450 MW 150 MW 150 MW 150 MW Graphic from GE info bulletin PSIB20150212 20

Missing Example Frequency decline 59.940 Hz 450 MW 152 MW for little more than 1 second +/- Dead Band MW 152 MW for little more than 1 second 150MW Graphic from GE info bulletin PSIB20150212 21

Example Frequency Decline 59.940 Hz 4 MW 400 MW 152 MW 404 MW +/- Dead Band MW 152 MW 100 MW Graphic from GE info bulletin PSIB20150212 22

Example Frequency 60.000 Hz 0 MW 450 MW 150 MW 450 MW 150 MW 150 MW Graphic from GE info bulletin PSIB20150212 23

Frequency 59.940 Hz Conventional Steam Plant 6 MW 400 MW 406 MW +/- Dead Band MW 24 Graphic from GE info bulletin PSIB20150212 406 MW

Tale of Two Tales No Frequency Algorithm in DCS 3-175 MW GE7FA Gas Mark VIe Turbine 3/3/2015 Frequency Algorithm in Plant DCS 25

200 MW What Has Been Learned: 3) BA EMS Pulse Control Squelching Response Balancing Authority EMS Pulse Control Squelching Frequency Response to the Generator Pulses Signals Generator 200 MW 200 MW Frequency Decline to 59.92 HZ 203 MW Pulses Signals 200 MW 26 Missing Algorithm to calculate 203 MW 200 MW 203 MW

Next Steps 1. OEMs, including GE, Siemens, and ABB, have and continue to communicate to its customer base through advisories and customer meetings. 2. Architect and Engineering Firms have been asked to communicate to their customer base. 3. Regions have been asked to formally communicate to GO s and BA s about the identified issues and request a timeline to address the issues. 4. NERC RS developing a Generator Governor Guideline for recommended settings for all Interconnections 5. Suggesting changes to FERC for governor requirements in the Large Generation Interconnection Agreement and Small Generation Interconnection Agreement 27

Resources NERC Resource Subcommittee North American Generator Forum www.generatorforum.org Original Equipment Manufacturers Industry Trade Associations Architect /Engineering Firms Balancing Authority 28

Participating Entities 29

30

NARUC Summer Committee Meetings Staff Subcommittees on Electricity & Electric Reliability

NARUC Summer Committee Meetings Update on the Cause of the April 7, 2015 Outage, Washington DC.

NARUC Summer Committee Meetings David Souder, Director of Operations Planning, Operations Support Department, PJM