Appendix 8. Draft Post Construction Noise Monitoring Protocol

Similar documents
Black. LWECS Site Permit. Stearns County. Permit Section:

TECHNICAL REPORT 2016 IEL ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE SURVEY OF THE DAIRYGOLD CASTLEFARM FACILITY, MITCHELSTOWN, CO. CORK.

Liddell Coal Operations

Noise monitoring during drilling operations Lower Stumble Well Site Balcombe, West Sussex

Protocol for Ambient Level Noise Monitoring

Ashton Coal. Environmental Noise Monitoring May Prepared for Ashton Coal Operations Pty Ltd

Pre-Construction Sound Study. Velco Jay Substation DRAFT. January 2011 D A T A AN AL Y S IS S OL U T I ON S

Cymbaluk Noise Complaints

Liddell Coal Operations

Roche Ireland Limited

W For inspection purposes only. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the approval of BnM Environmental.

Boggabri Coal Mine. Environmental Noise Monitoring October Prepared for Boggabri Coal Operations Pty Ltd

Roche Ireland Limited

PURPLE LINE EXTENSION SECTION 2 AMBIENT NOISE LEVEL REPORT METRO PROJECT RODEO STATION

Please refer to the figure on the following page which shows the relationship between sound fields.

Xtratherm Limited Kells Road, Navan, Co Meath

Standard Guide for Measurement of Outdoor A-Weighted Sound Levels 1

Liddell Coal Operations

Noise and Ground-Borne Vibration Monitoring

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

Quarterly Noise Monitoring Report Austar Coal Mine Middle Road, Paxton NSW January 2007

Attended Noise Monitoring Program

The following is the summary of Keane Acoustics community mechanical noise study for the City of St. Petersburg.

BASELINE NOISE MONITORING SURVEY

Muswellbrook Coal Company

NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT 2016

Rehab Glassco. Unit 4, Osberstown Industrial Park, Caragh Road, Naas, Co. Kildare. For inspection purposes only.

Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals

Muswellbrook Coal Company

McGill Environmental Ltd.

Bancroft & Piedmont Cellular Facility

Glassco Recycling. Unit 4, Osberstown Industrial Park, Caragh Road, Naas, Co. Kildare. For inspection purposes only.

Boggabri Coal Mine. Environmental Noise Monitoring June Prepared for Boggabri Coal Operations Pty Ltd

Errata to Procedural Standard for Sound & Vibration Measurement 2015 Third Edition

WesPac Pittsburg Energy Infrastructure Project. Noise Assessment Report

CENTRAL WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY, INAGH, CO. CLARE. ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE MONITORING MAY 2017.

Raging River Quarry. Environmental Noise Monitoring Protocol Provisional Operations 11/30/2016

UC Berkeley Northside Relocation Cellular Facility

NOISE IMPACT STUDY FOR THE SOUTH PIER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT BROOKLYN, NEW YORK. April 2008

Appendix L Noise Technical Report. Rehabilitation and Restoration of the Longfellow Bridge

Noise Monitoring Program

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT

79 First Avenue Mob: FIVE DOCK NSW 2046 VENTILATED ACOUSTIC ENCLOSURE NOISE EMISSION ASSESSMENT ACOUSTIC SERVICES & ADVICE

CORRECTION NOTICE SOUTH AFRICAN CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY CIVIL AVIATION ACT, 2009 (ACT NO. 13 OF 2009)

Attended Noise Monitoring Program

The influences of changes in international standards on performance qualification and design of anechoic and hemi-anechoic chambers

Black Butte Copper Project Mine Operating Permit Application (Revision 3)

Methods for rating and assessing industrial and commercial sound

ISO Rules Part 500 Facilities Division 502 Technical Requirements Section Wind Aggregated Generating Facilities Technical Requirements

Template Planning Condition on Amplitude Modulation Noise Guidance Notes

CALGA SAND QUARRY ATTENDED COMPLIANCE NOISE MONITORING 12 APRIL 2017 REPORT NO E VERSION A APRIL 2017 PREPARED FOR

Offaly County Council

University of York Heslington East Campus Details of Noise Modelling and Noise Survey. Report ref AAc/ /R01

Boggabri Coal Mine. Environmental Noise Monitoring August Prepared for Boggabri Coal Operations Pty Ltd

CHAPTER 48 NOISE POLLUTION

Electricity Supply to Africa and Developing Economies. Challenges and opportunities. Planning for the future in uncertain times

M Sport Evaluation Centre ( MEC ) Dovenby Hall Estate

N.J.A.C. 7:29 NOISE CONTROL

Wambo Coal Mine and Rail Spur

REPORT PERIOD: JANUARY 01 MARCH

OneSteel Recycling Hexham Quarterly Noise Monitoring Report Q2 2017

Standard Guide for Preparing a Measurement Plan for Conducting Outdoor Sound Measurements 1

Subject: Pappy s Grill and Sports Bar DJ System Acoustical Isolation Study

Keystone Pipeline Phases 1 & 2 Acoustic Monitoring Report for Canadian Pump Stations

AMERICAN UNIVERSITY EAST CAMPUS DEVELOPMENT WASHINGTON, D.C. Environmental Noise Study. Project Number

Assured Monitoring Group

Final ballot January BOT adoption February 2015

Bloomfield Colliery. Quarterly Noise Monitoring. and Compliance Assessment September Report Number Q R2.

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE MONITORING QUARTER 1, Northparkes Mines PO Box 995 Parkes NSW 2870

Wambo Coal Mine and Rail Spur

Small craft -Measurement of sound pressure level of airborne sound emitted by powered recreational craft

M Sport Evaluation Centre ( MEC ) Dovenby Hall Estate

Bickerdike Allen Partners

Pipeline Blowdown Noise Levels

Portable Noise Monitoring Report March 5 - April 24, 2016 The Museum of Vancouver. Vancouver Airport Authority

ITV CORONATION STREET PRODUCTION FACILITY, TRAFFORD WHARF ROAD ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL NOISE & VIBRATION IMPACT OF PROPOSED METROLINK LINE

TECHNICAL GUIDELINES FOR FM BROADCAST STANDARDS

Review of Baseline Noise Monitoring results and Establishment of Noise Criteria

Orora Pty Ltd. B9 Paper Mill EPL Compliance Quarterly noise monitoring report. 20 June Doc no QM-RP-4-0

Environment Protection Authority (EPA), Industrial Noise Policy (INP) 2000;

Short Term Aircraft Noise Monitoring Pacifica

Swan DH Noise Impact Assessment Report

Bloomfield Colliery. Quarterly Noise Monitoring and Compliance Assessment. September Report Number

DOWNWIND LEG NOISE MONITORING SUMMARY REPORT

Wambo Coal Mine and Rail Spur

Statement of Evidence of N I Hegley

ACOUSTIC BARRIER FOR TRANSFORMER NOISE. Ruisen Ming. SVT Engineering Consultants, Leederville, WA 6007, Australia

Acoustics Technical Note

CHAPTER 3 NOISE FUNDAMENTALS

WITHIN GENERATOR APPLICATIONS

January 7, Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C

Standard PRC Generator Frequency and Voltage Protective Relay Settings. A. Introduction. See the Implementation Plan for PRC

Standard PRC Generator Frequency and Voltage Protective Relay Settings. A. Introduction

Noise Study for Proposed Mavis Tire

Mackas Sand Pty Ltd ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE MONITORING AUGUST 2014

Cullen Valley Mine. Environmental Noise Monitoring Quarter 2, Prepared for Castlereagh Coal

A. INTRODUCTION B. METHODOLOGY

Technical Documentation

Attended Noise Monitoring - Quarter Ending September 2013

Soltec (Ireland) Limited Mullingar Business Park, Mullingar, Co Westmeath. Annual Noise Report

Transcription:

Appendix 8 Draft Post Construction Noise Monitoring Protocol

DRAFT CPV Valley Energy Center Prepared for: CPV Valley, LLC 50 Braintree Hill Office Park, Suite 300 Braintree, Massachusetts 02184 Prepared by: TRC Environmental Corporation 57 East Willow Street Millburn, New Jersey 07041 Draft October 2011

TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 1 2.0 STANDARDS... 1 2.1 Noise Testing Standards... 1 2.2 Town of Wawayanda Noise Standard... 1 3.0 NOISE MEASUREMENT LOCATIONS... 1 4.0 TESTING METHODOLOGY... 2 4.1 Measurement Conditions... 2 4.2 Noise Measurement Program... 2 4.3 Instrumentation... 2 4.4 Field Measurement Data Sheets... 3 5.0 REPORTING... 3 6.0 PROCEDURE FOR MITIGATING EXCESS NOISE... 4 7.0 NOISE COMPLAINT RESOLUTION PROCESS... 5 LIST OF FIGURES Figure No. Page Figure 1 Noise Testing Locations... 6 i October 2011

1.0 INTRODUCTION This operational noise compliance testing protocol has been prepared for the CPV Valley Energy Center (Project) for the purpose of determining compliance with the Town of Wawayanda noise performance standard. This protocol sets forth the standards and methods that CPV will employ to demonstrate that noise emissions from the Project comply with the Town s limits. This protocol also includes provisions for addressing potential community concerns related to noise levels from the Facility. The Construction Noise Monitoring Protocol will remain draft until review and finalization by the Planning Board during the Site Plan approval process. The contact person will be a member of the Facility staff, likely the plant manager. There will be one compliance test done, sometime in the first six months of commercial operation. 2.0 STANDARDS 2.1 Noise Testing Standards All noise measurements and procedures utilized in performing this compliance testing will be in conformance with the minimum following noise standards: ANSI S1.4-1983 or IEC651:1979/IEC804:1985 (Specification for Sound Level Meters) ANSI S1.13-1971 (Methods for the Measurement of Sound Pressure Levels) or later revisions ANSI S12.9-1993/Part 3 (Quantities and Procedures for Description and Measurement of Environmental Sound. Part 3: Short-Term Measurements with an Observer Present) or later revisions 2.2 Town of Wawayanda Noise Standard The Town of Wawayanda has adopted a noise performance standard in Article 4.5 of the Town Zoning Code. The standard limits facility generated noise levels to no greater than 65 db at a distance of 100 feet from the project lot line. Although not specified in the code, it is assumed for the purposes of this compliance testing protocol that the 65 db level is A-weighted (e.g., 65 dba). 3.0 NOISE MEASUREMENT LOCATIONS The Town of Wawayanda noise performance standard limits noise levels from the facility to no greater than 65 dba at distances of 100 feet from the Project property line. Testing will be conducted at five locations as depicted in Figure 1. 1 October 2011

4.0 TESTING METHODOLOGY CPV will conduct all noise testing during the evening and nighttime hours (between 8 p.m. and midnight) to minimize effects of intrusive noises from other sources (e.g., traffic, aircraft) allowing for more accurate noise measurements. Additionally, evening and nighttime conditions are more favorable for noise propagation, which will yield more conservative results. 4.1 Measurement Conditions Noise testing will be conducted by an acoustical consultant who is qualified by experience and/or training to conduct the measurements. The qualifications of the testing personnel will be documented in the compliance test report. To meet the requirements of the aforementioned standards, the noise monitoring program will be conducted under the following conditions: The Project will be operating normally at or near full load (80 percent load or higher). All air cooled condenser cooling fans will be operating. All measurements will be conducted during favorable noise propagation hours (i.e., 8 p.m. to midnight). No precipitation may occur during the measurement periods. Ambient temperature will be between 14 o F and 122 o F. Measurements will be taken during periods of light winds (wind speeds should not exceed 10 to 15 miles per hour). The meter microphones will be mounted at a nominal height of 5 feet (1.5 meters) above grade and will be fitted with foam windscreens. 4.2 Noise Measurement Program Noise generated by the Project will be steady in level. As such, long-term measurement of facility noise is not required, and a short-term measurement of 10 minutes at each location will be adequate for quantifying facility-generated noise. The short-term measurements will include measurement of each one-third octave band from 20 Hz through 10,000 Hz. Any of the sound level meters may be paused as needed to exclude extraneous noise sources present during the testing period. 4.3 Instrumentation CPV will perform noise level measurements utilizing integrating sound level meters and octave band analyzers with integral data loggers which meet ANSI S1.4-1983 requirements or IEC651:1979/IEC804:1985 for Precision Type 1 sound level meters. The microphones will be 2 October 2011

fitted with windscreens to reduce wind-generated noise and mounted at a nominal height of five feet above the ground. Large reflecting surfaces (such as building walls) will be avoided to the extent possible. CPV will ensure that all meters have been calibrated by a calibration laboratory to NIST-traceable standards within one year of the monitoring program. Measurements will be made with the meter set to fast response. Calibration of the meters will be verified in the field using a sound level calibrator at the beginning and end of the survey. The instruments will be programmed to measure and log, at a minimum, the L 90 noise level. The L 90 is a statistical measurement which represents the sound level exceeded 90 percent of the time, and is also referred to as the background or residual noise level. This type of measurement minimizes the effect of short term, intrusive noise sources, such as aircraft overflights or occasional traffic. The nature of the noise generated by the Project (steady, even noise levels) will be better measured using the L 90 descriptor. In fact, for an unchanging noise level, the L 90 and L eq are the same. For this reason, compliance determination will be made using the L 90 descriptor. All measured noise levels will be reported to the nearest one-tenth decibel. The L eq (defined as the energy average noise level during a measurement period) or any other descriptor may also be measured, but will not be used for compliance assessment purposes. 4.4 Field Measurement Data Sheets A field data sheet will be used to document all activities at each location during the noise measurement program. The data sheets will include a minimum of the following information: Names of personnel conducting testing; Name, manufacturer, and model number of each sound level meter and calibrator; Observed meteorological conditions; Observed sources of extraneous noise; An indication of whether the Project is clearly audible over other sources of noise; A sketch of the monitoring locations; Calibration information; and Any unusual conditions that could affect measured noise levels, including excessive extraneous noises. 5.0 REPORTING CPV will prepare a report for submittal to the Town of Wawayanda Planning Board that will include the following: The rationale for the monitoring program; A description of the noise monitoring locations and a map depicting these locations; Observed meteorological conditions at each location during each monitoring event; 3 October 2011

Observed noise sources including whether the Project was clearly audible at each location; A description of the equipment used; Instrument calibration records; Confirmation of Project load during testing; Copies of the field data sheets; A presentation of the measured sound level data, including charts as applicable. 6.0 PROCEDURE FOR MITIGATING EXCESS NOISE In the event that the operation of the plant is found, as supported with noise measurements, to generate noise levels that exceed project noise limits, the following procedure shall be used to sequentially evaluate remedial noise treatments. Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Identify the location(s) where plant noise exceeds the limits and obtain background information about the nature of the noise. This may include but not be limited to specific times that the noise is objectionable, confirmation that the noise originates from the project site, critical listening to evaluate the qualities of the noise (high or low pitch, hiss versus rumble, tonal versus broadband), temporal variability (is it continuous or intermittent), amplitude fluctuation (does it vary in intensity or is it steady). If it is determined conclusively from information gathered in Step 1 that the source of objectionable noise is not emanating from the project site, no further action shall be required. If information gathered in Step 1 further corroborates that the source(s) of excessive noise is associated with the operation of the facility; the objectionable noise source will be identified by means of additional noise measurements. Once the specific equipment that is responsible for facility noise exceeding the noise limits is identified, the sound emitted from that equipment will be checked against the purchase noise specification. If the equipment identified in Step 4 is part of the original facility design and is found to exceed the purchase noise specification, the equipment vendor shall be required to provide remedial noise treatments to comply with the specification. If the equipment identified in Step 4 meets purchase noise specifications, but is found to exceed the project noise limits additional noise mitigation measures shall be evaluated. Noise treatments for achieving compliance with the facility noise limits shall be engineered and implemented. Subsequently noise measurements shall be taken to verify that plant noise is brought into conformance with project noise requirements. 4 October 2011

7.0 NOISE COMPLAINT RESOLUTION PROCESS In the event that area residents have noise complaints or concerns during operation of the Facility, the following procedures will be followed to ensure that any concerns or complaints are properly addressed. A resident with noise concerns or complaints may contact the Plant Manager through a telephone number and email address that will be established for the Plant Manager. The Plant Manager (or a designated representative) will visit the resident with the concern or complaint to obtain additional information and observe (as possible and practical) the Facility sound that is causing the complaint. If the complaint is the cause of operational issues (e.g., access doors to building being left open unnecessarily), the Plant Manager will correct such issues and notify the resident of the resolution. If no operational issues are identified, and the complaint is related to standard Facility operation, then CPV Valley will conduct noise testing to determine if Facility related noise exceeds the Town s noise standards. Noise levels that are found to exceed the Town s standards will result in investigation by CPV Valley as detailed in Section 6 of this Protocol. The Plant Manager will notify the resident and the Town of Wawayanda Code Enforcement Officer through email of any exceedences that are found, the corrective action to be taken, and an approximate timeline for implementation of the corrective action. 5 October 2011

Figure 1 Noise Testing Locations Test Point 3 Test Point 2 Test Point 1 Test Point 5 Test Point 4 200 Feet 6 October 2011