STRATFORD MINING COMPLEX

Similar documents
STRATFORD MINING COMPLEX

Duralie Coal Mine. Quarterly Compliance Noise Monitoring. November Report Number R December 2016.

Attended Noise Monitoring - Quarter Ending September 2013

Liddell Coal Operations

Liddell Coal Operations

Muswellbrook Coal Company

Bloomfield Colliery. Quarterly Noise Monitoring. and Compliance Assessment September Report Number Q R2.

Attended Noise Monitoring Program

Boggabri Coal Mine. Environmental Noise Monitoring October Prepared for Boggabri Coal Operations Pty Ltd

Quarterly Noise Monitoring Report Austar Coal Mine Middle Road, Paxton NSW January 2007

Ashton Coal. Environmental Noise Monitoring May Prepared for Ashton Coal Operations Pty Ltd

Boggabri Coal Mine. Environmental Noise Monitoring August Prepared for Boggabri Coal Operations Pty Ltd

Attended Noise Monitoring Program

Liddell Coal Operations

Muswellbrook Coal Company

Wambo Coal Mine and Rail Spur

Bloomfield Colliery. Quarterly Noise Monitoring and Compliance Assessment. September Report Number

Boggabri Coal Mine. Environmental Noise Monitoring June Prepared for Boggabri Coal Operations Pty Ltd

Wambo Coal Mine and Rail Spur

Wambo Coal Mine and Rail Spur

Cullen Valley Mine. Environmental Noise Monitoring Quarter 2, Prepared for Castlereagh Coal

OneSteel Recycling Hexham Quarterly Noise Monitoring Report Q2 2017

REPORT PERIOD: JANUARY 01 MARCH

Mackas Sand Pty Ltd ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE MONITORING AUGUST 2014

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE MONITORING QUARTER 1, Northparkes Mines PO Box 995 Parkes NSW 2870

TECHNICAL REPORT 2016 IEL ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE SURVEY OF THE DAIRYGOLD CASTLEFARM FACILITY, MITCHELSTOWN, CO. CORK.

CALGA SAND QUARRY ATTENDED COMPLIANCE NOISE MONITORING 12 APRIL 2017 REPORT NO E VERSION A APRIL 2017 PREPARED FOR

BASELINE NOISE MONITORING SURVEY

Environment Protection Authority (EPA), Industrial Noise Policy (INP) 2000;

Mackas Sand Pty Ltd ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE MONITORING JULY 2013

Compliance Noise Survey & Assessment

Wambo Coal Mine and Rail Spur

Review of Baseline Noise Monitoring results and Establishment of Noise Criteria

Environment Protection Authority (EPA), Industrial Noise Policy (INP) 2000;

NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT 2016

CENTRAL WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY, INAGH, CO. CLARE. ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE MONITORING MAY 2017.

Noise Monitoring Program

Roche Ireland Limited

Rev2-18.Feb Safety Reliability Integrity Training Asset Support Design Support Troubleshooting

Rix's Creek Coal Mine

Annexure C-L.02 Report Page 2 of 6

Muswellbrook Coal Company

Pipeline Blowdown Noise Levels

Roche Ireland Limited

Offaly County Council

ORICA AUSTRALIA PTY LTD. ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE AUDIT OVERVIEW

McGill Environmental Ltd.

R e p o r t th A u g u s t

University of York Heslington East Campus Details of Noise Modelling and Noise Survey. Report ref AAc/ /R01

Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals

Orora Pty Ltd. B9 Paper Mill EPL Compliance Quarterly noise monitoring report. 20 June Doc no QM-RP-4-0

W For inspection purposes only. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the approval of BnM Environmental.

79 First Avenue Mob: FIVE DOCK NSW 2046 VENTILATED ACOUSTIC ENCLOSURE NOISE EMISSION ASSESSMENT ACOUSTIC SERVICES & ADVICE

Appendix 8. Draft Post Construction Noise Monitoring Protocol

Orora Compliance Monitoring

Environmental Noise Assessment Cambourne to Cambridge options

Orora Pty Ltd. B9 Paper Mill EPL Compliance Quarterly noise monitoring report. 11 August Doc no QM-RP-1-0

Noise monitoring during drilling operations Lower Stumble Well Site Balcombe, West Sussex

Wambo Coal Mine and Rail Spur

Orora Compliance Monitoring

APPENDIX K NAPIER PORT WHARF NO. 6 FUTURE PORT NOISE MAPS

Bickerdike Allen Partners

SYDNEY INTERNATIONAL CONTAINER TERMINALS Noise Compliance Assessment July 2015 Rp002 r SY. 23 October 2015

Sydney Metro City and Southwest North Corridor Works Technical Report - Noise Monitoring OOHW P1-6: 25 to 26 August 2018

Project: Mt Piper Power Station Ash Placement. Lamberts North Operational Noise Assessment March 2014

ACOUSTIC SIGNATURE OF OPEN CUT COAL MINES

Rehab Glassco. Unit 4, Osberstown Industrial Park, Caragh Road, Naas, Co. Kildare. For inspection purposes only.

Assured Monitoring Group

Glassco Recycling. Unit 4, Osberstown Industrial Park, Caragh Road, Naas, Co. Kildare. For inspection purposes only.

Assessing the accuracy of directional real-time noise monitoring systems

ITV CORONATION STREET PRODUCTION FACILITY, TRAFFORD WHARF ROAD ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL NOISE & VIBRATION IMPACT OF PROPOSED METROLINK LINE

ACOUSTIC BARRIER FOR TRANSFORMER NOISE. Ruisen Ming. SVT Engineering Consultants, Leederville, WA 6007, Australia

ABERDEEN HARBOUR EXPANSION PROJECT November Volume 3: Technical Appendices

Assessment of rail noise based on generic shape of the pass-by time history

Xtratherm Limited Kells Road, Navan, Co Meath

Soltec (Ireland) Limited Mullingar Business Park, Mullingar, Co Westmeath. Annual Noise Report

Cymbaluk Noise Complaints

Engineering a Sustainable Future for Our Environment

Noise Monitoring Report For. Schloetter (Ireland) Ltd. Naas Enterprise Park, Naas, Co. Kildare

Project: Mt Piper Power Station Ash Placement. Lamberts North Operational Noise Assessment March 2016

Noise and Ground-Borne Vibration Monitoring

Black Butte Copper Project Mine Operating Permit Application (Revision 3)

Southwood Fibre southern exports environmental noise assessment

Keystone Pipeline Phases 1 & 2 Acoustic Monitoring Report for Canadian Pump Stations

MALONE O REGAN. Annual Noise Survey Powerstown Landfill Industrial Emission Licence No. W March 2016

NETWORK RAIL BORDERS RAILWAY OPERATIONAL NOISE AND VIBRATION (YEAR 1, ROUND 2) REP-003. September 2016

Further Investigations of Low-frequency Noise Problem Generated by Freight Trains

Black. LWECS Site Permit. Stearns County. Permit Section:

Electricity Supply to Africa and Developing Economies. Challenges and opportunities. Planning for the future in uncertain times

The following is the summary of Keane Acoustics community mechanical noise study for the City of St. Petersburg.

Environmental Management System

Sheringham Shoal Cawston, Norfolk. Substation Noise Assessment Summary

Automated detection and analysis of amplitude modulation at a residence and wind turbine

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

Status: Rev: Comments Date: Author: Reviewer:

Statement of Evidence of N I Hegley

Appendix D: Preliminary Noise Evaluation

REVISED NOISE IMPACT STUDY

THE CASE FOR SPECTRAL BASELINE NOISE MONITORING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT.

November 12, Mr. Bryan Tripp Canadian Hydro Developers, Inc. 34 Harvard Road Guelph, ON N1G 4V8

Transcription:

STRATFORD MINING COMPLEX Prepared for: Stratford Coal Pty Ltd PO Box 168 Gloucester NSW 2422 SLR Ref: 630.11771-R10 Version No: v1.0

PREPARED BY SLR Consulting Australia Pty Ltd ABN 29 001 584 612 10 Kings Road New Lambton NSW 2305 Australia (PO Box 447 New Lambton NSW 2305 Australia) T: +61 2 4037 3200 F: +61 2 4037 3201 E: newcastleau@slrconsulting.com www.slrconsulting.com BASIS OF REPORT This report has been prepared by SLR Consulting Australia Pty Ltd with all reasonable skill, care and diligence, and taking account of the timescale and resources allocated to it by agreement with Stratford Coal Pty Ltd (the Client). Information reported herein is based on the interpretation of data collected, which has been accepted in good faith as being accurate and valid. This report is for the exclusive use of the Client. No warranties or guarantees are expressed or should be inferred by any third parties. This report may not be relied upon by other parties without written consent from SLR SLR disclaims any responsibility to the Client and others in respect of any matters outside the agreed scope of the work. DOCUMENT CONTROL Reference Date Prepared Checked Authorised 630.11771-R09-v1.0 22 November2018 Martin Davenport Robert Hall Martin Davenport Page 2

CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION... 5 2 SMC NOISE CRITERIA... 6 2.1 Project Approval Schedule 3 Environmental Performance Conditions... 6 2.2 EPL Noise Limits - SMC Operations... 9 2.3 Noise Limits at the Nominated Attended Noise Monitoring Locations... 9 2.4 Assessment of Low-frequency Emissions... 9 2.5 Rail Noise Goals... 10 3 OPERATIONAL NOISE MONITORING METHODOLOGY... 10 3.1 General Requirements... 10 3.2 Operator-attended Noise Monitoring Locations... 10 4 RESULTS... 13 4.1 Operator-attended Noise Monitoring - SMC Operational Activity... 13 4.1.1 Operator-attended Noise Survey Results - Atkins 14 4.1.2 Operator-attended Noise Survey Results - Clarke 15 4.1.3 Operator-attended Noise Survey Results - Hall 17 4.1.4 Operator-attended Noise Survey Results - Lowrey 18 4.1.5 Operator-attended Noise Survey Results - Pryce-Jones 19 4.1.6 Operator-attended Noise Survey Results - Van der Drift 20 4.1.7 Operator-attended Noise Survey Results - RTNM2 21 4.2 Rail Noise Monitoring... 22 5 PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT... 22 5.1 Operations... 22 5.2 Sleep Disturbance... 23 5.3 Rail Noise... 23 6 CONCLUSION... 23 DOCUMENT REFERENCES TABLES Table 1 Noise Limits for the Nominated Noise Monitoring Locations... 9 Page 3

CONTENTS Table 2 ARTC EPL 3142 Noise Objectives... 10 Table 3 SMC Operational Noise Monitoring Locations... 11 Table 4 SMC RTNM Verification Noise Monitoring Locations... 11 Table 5 Rail Noise Monitoring Locations... 11 Table 6 Operator-attended Noise Survey Results - Atkins... 14 Table 7 Operator-attended Noise Survey Results - Clarke... 15 Table 8 Operator-attended Noise Survey Results - Hall... 17 Table 9 Attended Noise Survey Results - Lowrey... 18 Table 10 Lowrey Night - NPfI Low Frequency Analysis... 19 Table 11 Attended Noise Survey Results Pryce Jones... 19 Table 12 Attended Noise Survey Results Van der Drift... 20 Table 13 Van der Drift Night - NPfI Low Frequency Analysis... 21 Table 14 Attended Noise Survey Results RTNM2... 21 Table 15 Operator-attended Rail Noise Monitoring Results... 22 Table 16 Performance Assessment - Operations... 22 Table 17 Performance Assessment - Sleep Disturbance... 23 FIGURES Figure 1 Attended Noise Monitoring Locations... 12 APPENDICES Appendix A Acoustic Terminology Appendix B Operator Attended Noise Survey Charts Page 4

1 Introduction Stratford Coal Pty Limited (DCPL), a wholly owned subsidiary of Yancoal Australia Limited (Yancoal), has commissioned SLR Consulting Australia Pty Ltd (SLR) to conduct monthly noise monitoring for the Stratford Mining Complex (SMC) operations guided by the requirements of the (Stratford Extension Project) Noise Management Plan (NMP), Document No. NMP-R01-A, dated March 2018. This report presents the results and findings from the operator-attended noise surveys conducted between Monday 24 and Tuesday 25. It is understood that the SMC collectively comprises the Stratford Coal Mine (SCM), the Bowens Road North Open Cut (BRNOC) and the associated coal processing and handling facilities. Run-of-mine (ROM) coal from the Duralie Coal Mine (DCM) is transported by rail to the SMC, where it is processed along with ROM coal from the SCM and BRNOC. SMC coal is then loaded and railed on the North Coast Railway to the port of Newcastle. The objectives of the noise monitoring programme for this operating period were as follows: Conduct three rounds of external operator-attended noise measurements at the six nominated locations, representative of receivers in the area surrounding the SMC. The six nominated external operator-attended noise measurement locations are: Atkins Off Wenhams Cox Road, Stratford Clarke Off Wenhams Cox Road, Stratford Hall Upper Avon Road Lowrey Off Crowthers Road, Stratford Pryce Jones The Bucketts Way, Craven Van der Drift Wood Street. Stratford Noise monitoring will occur for a day, evening and night period. The day, evening and night periods being those defined in the NSW Industrial Noise Policy (EPA 2000). The operator will quantify and characterise the maximum (LAmax) and the intrusive (LAeq and LCeq) noise level contributions from SMC operations over a 15 minute measurement period. In addition, the operator will quantify and characterise the overall levels of ambient noise (i.e. LAmax, LA1, LA10, LA50, LA90, and LAeq) over the 15 minute measurement interval. Assess the noise emissions of SMC and determine compliance with respect to the limits contained in the NMP. In addition to monthly noise monitoring at the nominated residential receivers, the NMP requires quarterly noise monitoring of rail activity and verification monitoring of the Real Time Noise Monitor (RTNM) network. RTNM verification and rail noise monitoring was conducted throughout the quarter ending. The following report uses specialist acoustic terminology. An explanation of common terms is provided in Appendix A. Page 5

2 SMC Noise Criteria The figures presented in this Section are extracts from the Stratford Extension Project (SSD-4966) Development Consent dated 29 May 2015. 2.1 Project Approval Schedule 3 Environmental Performance Conditions Page 6

Page 7

Page 8

2.2 EPL Noise Limits - SMC Operations The noise limits specified in EPL 5161 are consistent with the noise criteria specified in SSD-4966. 2.3 Noise Limits at the Nominated Attended Noise Monitoring Locations The site specific noise limits for the six nominated attended noise monitoring locations are summarised in Table 1. Table 1 Noise Limits for the Nominated Noise Monitoring Locations Locality Intrusiveness Criteria LAeq(15minute) Night LA1(1minute) Criterion Day Evening Night Night Atkins 1 35 35 35 45 Clarke 1,2 37 37 37 45 Hall 35 35 35 45 Lowrey 35 35 35 45 Pryce Jones 3 43 43 43 49 Van der Drift 37 36 35 45 Note 1: Note 2: Owned by Stratford Coal Pty Ltd Criteria adopted from Bagnall as a guide only and are not definitive at this location. Note 3: Land subject to acquisition upon request. 2.4 Assessment of Low-frequency Emissions To address the low-frequency noise assessment issues raised in the 2014 Independent Environmental Audit, as outlined in the VIPAC letter (29N-15-0009-TNT-472681-0, dated 26 February 2015), the following analysis of the operator-attended monitoring data was proposed: a full L Ceq minus L Aeq spectrum low frequency analysis will be conducted on all noise compliance measurements where the mine noise contribution is deemed to be the dominant noise source. This will be conducted in accordance with the guidance set out in the INP in accordance with the requirements of Development Consent 23-98/99 Schedule 3 Condition 7(a) and Development Consent 39-02-01 Schedule 2 Condition 6.4C(a)(i). The low-frequency analysis proposed above shall also serve to meet the Compliance Monitoring requirement of Section 5(d) of Appendix 6 Noise Compliance Assessment of the Stratford Extension Project Development Consent (SSD-4966, dated 29 May 2015), that states: the use of an appropriate modifying factor for low frequency noise to be applied during compliance testing at any individual residence if low frequency noise is present (in accordance with the INP) and before comparison with the specified noise levels in the consent. Low frequency noise is assessed under the NSW Noise Policy for Industry (NPfI) methodology following its introduction in 2017, and replaces the INP methodology. A full LCeq minus LAeq and low frequency 1/3 octave analysis of SMC noise contributions was conducted at the following locations: Lowrey - Night Page 9

Van der Drift - Night At all other locations SMC was not audible and/or significantly below the relevant noise criteria and is therefore not addressed further. The results of the operator attended noise measurements presented in Section 4. 2.5 Rail Noise Goals The NMP has adopted ARTC s EPL 3142 noise goals as criteria for the assessment of SMC rail transport noise. The noise objectives specified in ARTC s EPL 3142 apply at 1 m from the façade of affected residential properties and are provided in Table 2. Table 2 ARTC EPL 3142 Noise Objectives Descriptor Rail Traffic Goal dba Daytime/Evening LAeq(15hour) 65 Night-time LAeq(9hour) 60 Maximum Pass-by LAmax 85 3 Operational Noise Monitoring Methodology 3.1 General Requirements All acoustic instrumentation employed throughout the monitoring programme has been designed to comply with the requirements of AS IEC 61672.1 2004 Electroacoustics Sound level meters Specifications, AS IEC 61672.2-2004, AS IEC 61672.3-2004 and carried current NATA or manufacturer calibration certificates. Instrument calibration was checked before and after each measurement survey, with the variation in calibrated levels not exceeding ±0.5 dba. All operator-attended noise measurements were conducted using a one-third octave integrating Brüel & Kjær Type 2270 (s/n 2679354) and Svantek SVAN957 (s/n 23815) sound level meters together with a Svantek SV30A acoustical calibrator (s/n 24713). 3.2 Operator-attended Noise Monitoring Locations Noise monitoring was conducted in accordance with the requirements of the NMP. Operator-attended noise measurements were conducted during the day, evening and night-time period for a minimum of 15 minutes per period at each of the six nominated residential noise monitoring locations. The details of the operator-attended SMC operational noise monitoring locations are contained within Table 3 and shown generally in Figure 1. During the operator-attended noise measurements, the character and relative contribution of ambient noise sources and SMC contributions were determined by observations on site. Page 10

Table 3 SMC Operational Noise Monitoring Locations Monitoring Location Receiver Type Resident / Owner Monitoring Location - MGA Zone 56 Easting (m) Northing (m) Atkins Residence Atkins 401544 6447134 Clarke Residence Clarke 404406 6445783 Hall Residence Hall 398269 6443709 Lowrey Residence Lowrey 399193 6445879 Pryce Jones Residence Pryce Jones 400807 6441846 Van der Drift Residence Van der Drift 400171 6445775 The objective of the SMC operational operator-attended noise monitoring was to measure the maximum (LAmax) and the LAeq(15minute) noise level contributions at the nearest potentially affected receptors to determine the noise contribution of mining activities associated with SMC operations over a 15 minute measurement period. During the measurement, the operator also quantifies and characterises the overall levels of ambient noise in the area (i.e. LAmax, LA1, LA10, LA90, and LAeq) over the 15 minute measurement interval. Verification noise monitoring as part of the NMP is conducted at RTNM1 and RTNM2. The details of the operator-attended SMC operational noise monitoring locations are contained within Table 4 and shown generally in Figure 1. Table 4 SMC RTNM Verification Noise Monitoring Locations Monitoring Location Receiver Type Representative Receiver Locality Monitoring Location - MGA Zone 56 Easting (m) Northing (m) RTNM1 Real Time Noise Monitoring Location Stratford 400311 6445867 RTNM2 Real Time Noise Monitoring Location Craven 401039 6442114 The objective of the RTNM verification monitoring is to inform the continual calibration and validation of the RTNM system. The details of the rail noise monitoring locations are contained within Table 5 and shown generally in Figure 1. Table 5 Rail Noise Monitoring Locations Monitoring Location Receiver Type Representative Receiver Locality Monitoring Location - MGA Zone 56 Easting (m) Northing (m) TN1 Rail Noise Monitoring Location Craven 400182 6441933 TN2 Rail Noise Monitoring Location Wards River 399914 6434771 The objective of the rail noise monitoring is to determine rail pass-by noise levels from the Stratford coal export trains. Page 11

Figure 1 Attended Noise Monitoring Locations Source: NMP Page 12

4 Results 4.1 Operator-attended Noise Monitoring - SMC Operational Activity Operator-attended noise measurements were conducted during a day, evening and night period between Monday 24 and Tuesday 25. Results of the operator-attended noise surveys at residential locations are provided in Sections 4.1.1 to 4.1.6. A summary of the results for the attended noise monitoring are displayed graphically in Appendix B showing LAmax, LAeq, and LAeq(<1.25kHz) in 1-second intervals throughout the monitoring survey. Ambient noise levels presented include all noise sources such as transport (roads, rail and aircraft), fauna (insects, frogs, birds, and bats), farm animals (cows, bulls), the natural environment (wind, wind in trees), domestic noises, other industrial operations as well as SMC noise emissions. Weather data during the monitoring period has been obtained from the weather station located on the SMC site. The tables provide the following information: Date and start time, operator and equipment details. Monitoring location. Wind velocity (m/s) and temperature (ºC) at the measurement location. Typical maximum (LAmax) and contributed LAeq(15minute) noise levels. Page 13

4.1.1 Operator-attended Noise Survey Results - Atkins Results of the operator-attended noise surveys at Atkins are provided in Table 6. Monitoring location Atkins represents residential receptors located to the north of the site. Table 6 Operator-attended Noise Survey Results - Atkins Period Date/Start Time/ Weather Primary Noise Descriptor dba (15 minute) LAmax LA1 LA10 LA90 LAeq LAeq ( 1.25kHz) Description of Noise Emissions and Typical Maximum Noise Levels (dba) Day 25/9/18 08:58: 14 C 2 m/s WSW Evening 24/9/18 20:14 12 C Calm Night 24/9/18 23:39 11 C Calm 69 63 47 29 48 47 Site related noise events: SMC: Audible Engine noise 28-33 LAeq(15minute) contribution 30 dba Aeroplane 50 Local traffic 58-69 Birdsong 47 Train 32 44 25 20 18 20 15 Site related noise events: SMC: Inaudible Distant traffic 20-26 Birdsong 29-44 Dog 24-27 45 31 25 21 24 22 Site related noise events: SMC: Inaudible Livestock 39 Rod traffic 23-34 Exhaust cooling click 45 SMC operations were audible only during the day measurement at this location generating an LAeq(15minute) noise contribution of 30 dba. Page 14

4.1.2 Operator-attended Noise Survey Results - Clarke Results of the operator-attended noise surveys at Clarke are provided in Table 7. Monitoring location Clarke represents residential receptors located to the east of the site, and is a SMC owned property. The monitoring results at Clarke are used to determine SMC contributions at the Bagnall residence located further to the east. Table 7 Operator-attended Noise Survey Results - Clarke Period Date/Start Time/ Weather Primary Noise Descriptor dba (15 minute) LAmax LA1 LA10 LA90 LAeq LAeq ( 1.25kHz) Description of Noise Emissions and Typical Maximum Noise Levels (dba) Day 24/9/18 12:49 14 C 2 m/s S Evening 1 24/9/18 19:52 12 C 1 m/s S Night 1 25/9/18 00:02 11 C Calm 65 51 47 40 45 43 Site related noise events: SMC: Audible Excavator 40-51 LAeq(15minute) contribution 44 dba Aeroplane 49 Birdsong 55-65 50 33 29 21 26 23 Site related noise events: SMC: Audible Mechanical plant 26-30 (intermittently operational) LAeq(15minute) contribution 23 dba Livestock 25-37 Aeroplane 38 Distant traffic 22 Exhaust cooling 50 49 44 39 22 34 34 Site related noise events: SMC: Audible Dozer 38-47 Mechanical plant 26-28 LAeq(15minute) contribution 34 dba LAmax contribution 47 dba Birdsong (plover) 33 Livestock 40-49 1. Due to limited access to the Clarke monitoring location after hours, noise monitoring was conducted at the western entrance to the Bowens Road realignment construction site. Page 15

Mining operations in the Avon North open cut were the dominant noise source during the day, evening and night-time monitoring periods. SMC operations generated an LAeq(15minute) noise contribution of 44 dba, 23 dba and 34 dba during the day, evening and night-time, respectively. During the night time monitoring period the operation of a dozer generated LAmax noise levels of up to 47 dba at the monitoring location. Taking into account the distance between the observed SMC operations and the nearest privately owned residence Bagnall, LAeq(15minute) noise levels of 36 dba during the daytime and less than <25 during the evening and night are predicted at the Bagnall location. LAmax noise levels are predicted to be 35 dba. It should be noted that this figure is considered conservative as it takes into account corrections for propagation distance only (i.e. no shielding due to topography or atmospheric absorption). As such SMC operations are considered to be compliant at the Bagnall location. Page 16

4.1.3 Operator-attended Noise Survey Results - Hall Results of the operator-attended noise surveys at Hall are provided in Table 8. Monitoring location Hall represents residential receptors located to the southwest of the site. Table 8 Operator-attended Noise Survey Results - Hall Period Date/Start Time/ Weather Primary Noise Descriptor dba (15 minute) LAmax LA1 LA10 LA90 LAeq LAeq ( 1.25kHz) Description of Noise Emissions and Typical Maximum Noise Levels (dba) Day 25/9/18 09:43 15 C 1.5 m/s SE Evening 24/9/18 21:26 12 C Calm Night 24/9/18 22:27 12 C Calm 69 53 43 30 42 36 Site related noise events: SMC: Audible Fixed plant and dozer 24-28 LAeq(15minute) contribution 25 dba Birdsong 34-69 Road traffic 36 Aeroplane 36-45 Resident truck 40-47 Dog barking 38 44 31 25 19 23 19 Site related noise events: SMC: Audible Fixed plant 21-25 Dozer 24 LAeq(15minute) contribution 19 dba Insects/frogs 25-32 Birdsong 27 Exhaust cooling 30-44 57 34 28 22 27 25 Site related noise events: SMC: Audible Fixed plant and dozer 20-28 LAeq(15minute) contribution 24 dba LAmax contribution 28 dba Animal 57 Exhaust cooling 34-48 Road traffic 20-39 SMC operations were audible during the all operator attended noise surveys at this location. SMC operations generated an LAeq(15minute) noise contribution of 25 dba, 19 dba and 24 dba during the day, evening and nighttime, respectively. During the night time period the operation of a dozer generated LAmax noise levels of up to 28 dba at the monitoring location. Page 17

4.1.4 Operator-attended Noise Survey Results - Lowrey Results of the operator-attended noise surveys at Lowrey are provided in Table 9. Monitoring location Lowrey represents residential receptors located to the west of the site and west of Bucketts Way. Table 9 Attended Noise Survey Results - Lowrey Period Date/Start Time/ Weather Primary Noise Descriptor dba (15 minute) LAmax LA1 LA10 LA90 LAeq LAeq ( 1.25kHz) Description of Noise Emissions and Typical Maximum Noise Levels (dba) Day 8:25 25/9/18 14 C 0.5 m/s NE Evening 24/9/18 20:39: 12 C Calm Night 24/9/18 23:13 12 C Calm 56 48 41 32 38 34 Site related noise events: SMC: Barely Audible Engine noise <25 LAeq(15minute) contribution<25 dba Road traffic 30-42 Birdsong 35-56 Livestock 45 Aeroplane 43 44 38 33 22 28 27 Site related noise events: SMC: Audible CHPP 22-23 LAeq(15minute) contribution 22 dba Road traffic 32-43 Dog barking 34-44 Insects 21-25 Birdsong 34 Aeroplane 25 49 38 33 29 32 31 Site related noise events: SMC: Audible Fixed plant and dozer 27-37 LAeq(15minute) contribution 31 dba LAmax contribution 37 dba Road traffic 37-41 Insects 25 Livestock 35 Birdsong 49 SMC operations were audible during the all operator attended noise surveys at this location. SMC operations generated an LAeq(15minute) noise contribution of <25 dba, 22 dba and 30 dba during the day, evening and night-time, respectively. During the night time period the operation of a dozer generated LAmax noise levels of up to 37 dba at the monitoring location. During the night-time measurement the difference between LCeq - LAeq noise levels from SMC exceeded 15 db which triggers a more detailed assessment of low frequency noise. Table 10 details the 1/3 octave SMC contribution assessed against the NPfI low frequency threshold. Page 18

Table 10 Frequency (Hz) Lowrey Night - NPfI Low Frequency Analysis 10 12.5 16 20 25 31.5 40 50 63 80 100 125 160 LZeq(15minute) threshold Level dbz SMC LZeq(15minute) noise level 92 89 86 77 69 61 54 50 50 48 48 46 44 46 57 63 41 49 44 35 30 31 32 34 28 26 Exceedance - - - - - - - - - - - - - SMC noise levels were below the NPfI threshold levels in all 1/3 octave bands. As such no positive adjustment to the measured noise level is to be applied. 4.1.5 Operator-attended Noise Survey Results - Pryce-Jones Results of the operator-attended noise surveys at Pryce Jones are provided in Table 11. Monitoring location Pryce Jones represents residential receptors located in Craven to the south of the site. Table 11 Attended Noise Survey Results Pryce Jones Period Date/Start Time/ Weather Primary Noise Descriptor dba (15 minute) LAmax LA1 LA10 LA90 LAeq LAeq ( 1.25kHz) Description of Noise Emissions and Typical Maximum Noise Levels (dba) Day 24/9/18 11:48: 13 C 2 m/s S Evening 24/9/18 21:48 12 C Calm Night 24/9/18 22:05 12 C Calm 81 72 63 36 59 58 Site related noise events: SMC: Inaudible Road traffic 65-81 Birdsong 32-47 Wind in trees 31-36 68 61 37 23 46 45 Site related noise events: SMC: Barely Audible Site noise <25 LAeq(15minute) contribution <25 dba Insects/frogs 28-43 Road traffic 60-78 68 60 32 22 45 44 Site related noise events: SMC: Barely Audible Site noise <25 LAeq(15minute) contribution <25 dba LAmax contribution <25 dba Insects/frogs 28-37 Road traffic 66-68 Page 19

SMC operations were barely audible during the evening and night-time operator attended noise surveys at this location generating LAeq(15minute) and LAmax noise levels of less than 25 dba 4.1.6 Operator-attended Noise Survey Results - Van der Drift Results of the operator-attended noise surveys at Van der Drift are provided in Table 12. Table 12 Attended Noise Survey Results Van der Drift Period Date/Start Time/ Weather Primary Noise Descriptor dba (15 minute) LAmax LA1 LA10 LA90 LAeq LAeq ( 1.25kHz) Description of Noise Emissions and Typical Maximum Noise Levels (dba) Day 25/9/18 09:19: 15 C 2 m/s S Evening 24/9/18 21:02: 12 C Calm Night 24/9/18 22:50 12 C Calm 64 47 40 27 37 33 Site related noise events: SMC: Inaudible Road traffic 32-43 Aeroplane 39 Birdsong 34-64 41 34 29 25 28 26 Site related noise events: SMC: Audible Fixed plant 25-29 LAeq(15minute) contribution 27 dba Road traffic 41 Insects/frogs 22-23 48 41 37 32 35 35 Site related noise events: SMC: Audible Fixed plant and dozer 31-42 LAeq(15minute) contribution 35 dba LAmax contribution 42 dba Exhaust cooling 36-48 Insects 23-26 SMC operations were audible during the evening and night-time operator attended noise surveys at this location generating an LAeq(15minute) noise contribution of 27 dba and 35 dba respectively. LAmax noise levels of 42 dba were generated by dozer activity. During the night-time measurement the difference between LCeq - LAeq noise levels from SMC exceeded 15 db which triggers a more detailed assessment of low frequency noise. Table 13 details the 1/3 octave SMC contribution assessed against the NPfI low frequency threshold. Page 20

Table 13 Frequency (Hz) Van der Drift Night - NPfI Low Frequency Analysis 10 12.5 16 20 25 31.5 40 50 63 80 100 125 160 LZeq(15minute) threshold Level dbz SMC LZeq(15minute) noise level 92 89 86 77 69 61 54 50 50 48 48 46 44 47 63 62 42 48 38 34 36 36 39 39 36 32 Exceedance - - - - - - - - - - - - - SMC noise levels were below the NPfI threshold levels in all 1/3 octave bands. As such no positive adjustment to the measured noise level is to be applied. 4.1.7 Operator-attended Noise Survey Results - RTNM2 Results of the operator-attended noise surveys at RTNM2 are provided in Table 14. Table 14 Attended Noise Survey Results RTNM2 Period Date/Start Time/ Weather Primary Noise Descriptor dba (15 minute) LAmax LA1 LA10 LA90 LAeq LAeq ( 1.25kHz) Description of Noise Emissions and Typical Maximum Noise Levels (dba) Day 24/9/18 11:24 13 C 2 m/s S 57 48 41 32 39 36 Site related noise events: SMC: Inaudible Road traffic 30-44 Birdsong 57 Wind in trees 30-35 SMC operations were not audible at this location. Page 21

4.2 Rail Noise Monitoring SMC rail pass-by noise levels are presented in Table 15. Table 15 Operator-attended Rail Noise Monitoring Results Monitoring Location Date and Time LAmax (dba) Horn Included Horn Excluded TN1 24/9/2018 12:13 - to Stratford 85 85 TN2 24/9/2018 16:33 - from Stratford 81 81 24/9/2018 10:41 - to Stratford 80 80 Maximum SMC rail pass-by noise levels (excluding the sounding of horns on approach to level crossings) did not exceed 85 dba at the monitoring locations. 5 Performance Assessment 5.1 Operations Results of the operator-attended noise measurements compared with the relevant noise criteria contained in the SMC Development Consent are given in Table 16. Table 16 Performance Assessment - Operations Estimated SMC LAeq(15minute) Noise Level dba 1 Noise Criteria LAeq(15minute) dba Compliance Day Eve Night Day Eve Night Day Eve Night Atkins 30 I/A I/A 35 35 35 Yes Yes Yes Clarke 2 44 23 34 37 37 37 No 4 Yes Yes Bagnall 3 34 <25 <25 37 37 37 Yes Yes Yes Hall 25 19 24 35 35 35 Yes Yes Yes Lowrey <25 22 31 35 35 35 Yes Yes Yes Pryce Jones I/A <25 <25 43 43 43 Yes Yes Yes Van der Drift I/A 27 35 37 36 35 Yes Yes Yes Note 1: Note 2: Note 3: Note 4: I/A = Inaudible. Owned by Stratford Coal Pty Ltd. Criteria adopted from Bagnall Calculated result from monitoring location Clarke Criteria adopted as a guide only Results presented in Table 16 indicate that SMC operations during the operator-attended noise monitoring at all privately owned locations were compliant with the relevant Development Consent conditions. Noise levels at Clarke were above the adopted noise criteria, however the Clarke property is owned by Stratford Coal Pty Ltd. Page 22

5.2 Sleep Disturbance Results of the night period sleep disturbance measurements compared with the relevant noise criteria contained in the Development Consent are given in Table 17. Table 17 Performance Assessment - Sleep Disturbance Location SMC LA1(1minute) Contribution Noise Criteria LA1(1minute) Compliance Atkins I/A 1 45 Yes Clarke 2 47 45 No 4 Bagnall 3 35 45 Yes Hall I/A 45 Yes Lowrey I/A 45 Yes Pryce Jones I/A 49 Yes Van der Drift I/A 45 Yes Note 1: Note 2: Note 3: Note 4: I/A = Inaudible. Owned by Stratford Coal Pty Ltd. Criteria adopted from Bagnall Calculated result from monitoring location Clarke Criteria adopted as a guide only Table 17 indicate that SMC operations during the night-time operator-attended noise monitoring at all privately owned locations were compliant with the relevant Development Consent conditions. Noise levels at Clarke were above the adopted noise criteria, however the Clarke property is owned by Stratford Coal Pty Ltd. 5.3 Rail Noise Maximum SMC rail pass-by noise levels complied with the noise goal of 85 dba at all monitoring locations, excluding the sounding of horns on approach to level crossings. 6 Conclusion SLR was engaged by Stratford Coal Pty Limited to conduct monthly noise monitoring for the Stratford Mining Complex (SMC) operations guided by the requirements of the Noise Management Plan (NMP), Document No. NMP-R01-A, dated March 2018. Operator-attended noise monitoring was conducted at six residential receiver locations between Monday 24 and Tuesday 25 in order to determine the noise performance of the SMC operations against the Development Consent conditions. Based on the measured SMC noise contribution, compliance with the relevant operational noise criteria was achieved at all noise monitoring locations during the day, evening and night monitoring periods, with the exception of Clarke during the day period. Noise levels at Clarke were above the adopted noise criteria, however the Clarke property is owned by Stratford Coal Pty Ltd. Page 23

APPENDIX A Acoustic Terminology 630.11771-R10-v1.0.docx Page 1 of 1

APPENDIX B Operator Attended Noise Survey Charts 630.11771-R10-v1.0.docx Page 1 of 10

Figure B1 Day Period Atkins Operator Attended Noise Survey Results Figure B2 Evening Period Atkins Operator Attended Noise Survey Results 630.11771-R10-v1.0.docx Page 2 of 10

Figure B3 Night Period Atkins Operator Attended Noise Survey Results Figure B4 Day Period Clarke Operator Attended Noise Survey Results 630.11771-R10-v1.0.docx Page 3 of 10

Figure B5 Evening Period Clarke Operator Attended Noise Survey Results Figure B6 Night Period Clarke Operator Attended Noise Survey Results 630.11771-R10-v1.0.docx Page 4 of 10

Figure B7 Day Period Hall Operator Attended Noise Survey Results Figure B8 Evening Period Hall Operator Attended Noise Survey Results 630.11771-R10-v1.0.docx Page 5 of 10

Figure B9 Night Period Hall Operator Attended Noise Survey Results Figure B10 Day Period Lowrey Operator Attended Noise Survey Results 630.11771-R10-v1.0.docx Page 6 of 10

Figure B11 Evening Period Lowrey Operator Attended Noise Survey Results Figure B12 Night Period Lowrey Operator Attended Noise Survey Results 630.11771-R10-v1.0.docx Page 7 of 10

Figure B13 Day Period Pryce Jones Operator Attended Noise Survey Results Figure B14 Evening Period Pryce Jones Operator Attended Noise Survey Results 630.11771-R10-v1.0.docx Page 8 of 10

Figure B15 Night Period Pryce Jones Operator Attended Noise Survey Results Figure B16 Day Period Van der Drift Operator Attended Noise Survey Results 630.11771-R10-v1.0.docx Page 9 of 10

Figure B17 Evening Period Van der Drift Operator Attended Noise Survey Results Figure B18 Night Period Van der Drift Operator Attended Noise Survey Results 630.11771-R10-v1.0.docx Page 10 of 10

ASIA PACIFIC OFFICES BRISBANE CANBERRA DARWIN MACKAY Level 2, 15 Astor Terrace Spring Hill QLD 4000 Australia T: +61 7 3858 4800 GPO 410 Canberra ACT 2600 Australia T: +61 2 6287 0800 5 Foelsche Street Darwin NT 0800 Australia T: +61 8 8998 0100 21 River Street Mackay QLD 4740 Australia T: +61 7 3181 3300 F: +61 7 3858 4801 F: +61 2 9427 8200 F: +61 2 9427 8200 MELBOURNE Suite 2, 2 Domville Avenue Hawthorn VIC 3122 Australia T: +61 3 9249 9400 F: +61 3 9249 9499 NEWCASTLE 10 Kings Road New Lambton NSW 2305 Australia T: +61 2 4037 3200 F: +61 2 4037 3201 PERTH Ground Floor, 503 Murray Street Perth WA 6000 Australia T: +61 8 9422 5900 F: +61 8 9422 5901 ROCKHAMPTON rockhampton@slrconsulting.com M: +61 407 810 417 SYDNEY TAMWORTH TOWNSVILLE 2 Lincoln Street Lane Cove NSW 2066 Australia T: +61 2 9427 8100 F: +61 2 9427 8200 PO Box 11034 Tamworth NSW 2340 Australia M: +61 408 474 248 F: +61 2 9427 8200 Level 1, 514 Sturt Street Townsville QLD 4810 Australia T: +61 7 4722 8000 F: +61 7 4722 8001 AUCKLAND 68 Beach Road NELSON 5 Duncan Street NEW PLYMOUTH Level 2, 10 Devon Street East Auckland 1010 New Zealand T: +64 27 441 7849 Port Nelson 7010 New Zealand T: +64 274 898 628 New Plymouth 4310 New Zealand T: +64 0800 757 695