User Guide for the Calculators Version 0.9

Similar documents
AN4949 Application note

Test Plan for Hearing Aid Compatibility

A Low Power Integrated UWB Transceiver with Solar Energy Harvesting for Wireless Image Sensor Networks

AN4378 Application note

CMOS 2.4GHZ ZIGBEE/ISM TRANSMIT/RECEIVE RFeIC

MULTI-SYSTEM OPTIMIZATION OF RF FRONT END WITH RELAXATION OF REQUIREMENTS

Glen Westwell, Wireless Technologist

CMOS 2.4GHZ ZIGBEE/ISM TRANSMIT/RECEIVE RFeIC

CMOS 2.4GHZ ZIGBEE/ISM TRANSMIT/RECEIVE RFeIC

RF Board Design. EEC 134 Application Note. Jo Han Yu

IT-24 RigExpert. 2.4 GHz ISM Band Universal Tester. User s manual

Unit 3 - Wireless Propagation and Cellular Concepts

Quick Site Testing with the 8800SX

The LoRa Protocol. Overview. Interference Immunity. Technical Brief AN205 Rev A0

doc.: IEEE d IEEE P Wireless Personal Area Networks

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R SM Method for measurements of radio noise

AN0504 Tag Design with swarm bee LE

Application Note 5057

Application Note SAW-Components

Basic Transceiver tests with the 8800S

Catalog

Simulation of GaAs phemt Ultra-Wideband Low Noise Amplifier using Cascaded, Balanced and Feedback Amplifier Techniques

AN5029 Application note

DAMs Universal Link Commander

VSWR MEASUREMENT APPLICATION NOTE ANV004.

Battery lifetime modelling for a 2.45GHz cochlear implant application

Application Note AN041

Leveraging High-Accuracy Models to Achieve First Pass Success in Power Amplifier Design

Implementation of RSSI-Based 3D Indoor Localization using Wireless Sensor Networks Based on ZigBee Standard

SETTING UP A WIRELESS LINK USING ME1000 RF TRAINER KIT

ISO/IEC INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

Power Amplifier Testing For ac APPLICATION NOTE

Chapter IX Using Calibration and Temperature Compensation to improve RF Power Detector Accuracy By Carlos Calvo and Anthony Mazzei

3GPP TS V8.0.0 ( )

AN0509 swarm API Country Settings

Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks N

Motivation. Approach. Requirements. Optimal Transmission Frequency for Ultra-Low Power Short-Range Medical Telemetry

HY448 Sample Problems

1-13GHz Wideband LNA utilizing a Transformer as a Compact Inter-stage Network in 65nm CMOS

RFFM V to 4.2V, ISM Band, 1W, 405MHz to 475MHz Transmit/Receive Module. Features. Applications. Ordering Information

Methodology for Analysis of LMR Antenna Systems

Application Note: IQ Filtering in an RFID Reader Using Anadigm Integrated circuits,

ELEN 701 RF & Microwave Systems Engineering. Lecture 4 October 11, 2006 Dr. Michael Thorburn Santa Clara University

ENGLISH TRANSLATION. 920MHz-BAND TELEMETER, TELECONTROL AND DATA TRANSMISSION RADIO EQUIPMENT ARIB STANDARD. ARIB STD-T108 Version 1.

AM BASIC ELECTRONICS TRANSMISSION LINES JANUARY 2012 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY MILITARY AUXILIARY RADIO SYSTEM FORT HUACHUCA ARIZONA

Characteristic Sym Notes Minimum Typical Maximum Units Operating Frequency Range MHz Operating Frequency Tolerance khz

AN5009 Application note

Wireless Communication in Embedded System. Prof. Prabhat Ranjan

Optiva RF-Over-Fiber Design Tool User s Guide. Revision 1.0 March 27, 2015

Low Power RF Transceivers

Keysight Technologies Pulsed Antenna Measurements Using PNA Network Analyzers

DISCONTINUED. Modulation Type Number of RF Channels 15

AN-1370 APPLICATION NOTE

Final draft ETSI EG V1.1.0 ( )

Wavedancer A new ultra low power ISM band transceiver RFIC

Multifunctional Microwave Analyzer

INSTRUCTION SHEET WIDEBAND POWER SENSOR MODEL Copyright 2008 by Bird Electronic Corporation Instruction Book P/N Rev.

Characteristic Sym Notes Minimum Typical Maximum Units Operating Frequency Range MHz Operating Frequency Tolerance khz

Simplified, high performance transceiver for phase modulated RFID applications

Improving Amplitude Accuracy with Next-Generation Signal Generators

TECHNICAL INFORMATION

1 of 7 12/20/ :04 PM

A DISCUSSION ON QAM SNARE SENSITIVITY

Module contents. Antenna systems. RF propagation. RF prop. 1

Design of low-loss 60 GHz integrated antenna switch in 65 nm CMOS

Transmit Power Extension Power Combiners/Splitters Figure 1 Figure 2

Wireless hands-free using nrf24e1

Keywords: GPS, receiver, GPS receiver, MAX2769, 2769, 1575MHz, Integrated GPS Receiver, Global Positioning System

RF Emissions Test Report To Determine Compliance With: FCC, Part 15 Rules and Regulations

Comparison between Preamble Sampling and Wake-Up Receivers in Wireless Sensor Networks

EXAM QUESTION EXAMPLES

Low Power with Long Range RF Module DATASHEET Description

INVENTION DISCLOSURE- ELECTRONICS SUBJECT MATTER IMPEDANCE MATCHING ANTENNA-INTEGRATED HIGH-EFFICIENCY ENERGY HARVESTING CIRCUIT

Technical Documentation

LNA VCC RX OUT TX IN VREG. Product Description. Ordering Information. Standard 25 piece bag Standard 2500 piece reel. GaAs HBT GaAs MESFET InGaP HBT

Catalog

Simple high sensitivity wireless transceiver

802.11g Wireless Sensor Network Modules

Exercises for the Antenna Matching Course

CHAPTER - 6 PIN DIODE CONTROL CIRCUITS FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS

Si4432 Errata (Revision V2)

Stacked-FET linear SOI CMOS SPDT antenna switch with input P1dB greater than

RF NiceRF Wireless Technology Co., Ltd. Rev

38123 Povo Trento (Italy), Via Sommarive 14

CMOS 5GHz WLAN ac RFeIC WITH PA, LNA AND SPDT

Instantaneous Inventory. Gain ICs

Ultra Wideband Transceiver Design

AN4392 Application note

Statistical Pulse Measurements using USB Power Sensors

6.976 High Speed Communication Circuits and Systems Lecture 20 Performance Measures of Wireless Communication

Catalog

VT-CC2530-Z1 Wireless Module. User Guide

Exam 3 is two weeks from today. Today s is the final lecture that will be included on the exam.

Applications. Operating Modes. Description. Part Number Description Package. Many to one. One to one Broadcast One to many

Band-Reconfigurable High-Efficiency Power Amplifier 900 MHz/1900 MHz Dual-Band PA Using MEMS Switches

A passive circuit based RF optimization methodology for wireless sensor network nodes. Article (peer-reviewed)

On the problem of energy efficiency of multi-hop vs one-hop routing in Wireless Sensor Networks

Selected answers * Problem set 6

2.4 GHz TX / RX Booster With Diversity Switch for IoT / BLE / ZigBee

TRANSMITTER MODEL: KAS-2030M

Transcription:

User Guide for the Calculators Version 0.9 Last Update: Nov 2 nd 2008 By: Shahin Farahani Copyright 2008, Shahin Farahani. All rights reserved. You may download a copy of this calculator for your personal use. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the author. Permissions may be sought directly from the author E-mail: ShahinFarahani@ieee.org

1. Introduction The simple calculator spreadsheet you have downloaded from the LearnZigBee.com website is developed based the materials discussed in the ZigBee Wireless Networks and Transceivers book. This document explains different tabs in the spreadsheet and walks you through a number of examples. In the spreadsheet, the cells that contain calculation results have yellow shade and should not be modified. You can change the value of the cells that have no shading. For the latest version of this document and the calculator spreadsheet please visit LearnZigBee.com. You can send your comments to ShahinFarahani@ieee.org 2. Range Calculation Click on the Range Calculation tab of the spreadsheet. This calculator is based on the materials discussed in section 5.8 of the book and allows you to answer the following question: How far can we separate two nodes from each other and still expecting the nodes to communicate properly? Assume node A is transmitting and node B is receiving. There are five parameters that we use to calculate the range: P o (dbm): This is the transmitted power from node A. You need to include the antenna gain (if present). P r (dbm): This is the receiver sensitivity of node A. n : The path loss exponent (Table 5.1, chapter five). The value of n depends on the environment. F m (db): This is the fade margin (section 5.5.3) f (MHz): The transmitted signal frequency The range in cell D24 is calculated from the equation 5.9. For instance, if the transmitted power from node A is -3dBm, node B sensitivity is -85dBm, the path loss exponent is 2.5, the fade margin is estimated at 8dB, and the signal frequency is 2405MHz signal, then node B can be as far as 19 meters and receives the packets from node A with PER of 1% or less. Similarly, you can calculate the range when node B is transmitting and node A is receiving. The practical range for two-way communication is the smaller of these two range calculations. 3. Range Extension Click on the Range Extension tab of the spreadsheet. This calculator provides three range extension estimates based on the materials discussed in section 5.8.1 of the book. In all three

scenarios, it is assumed that the transmitted output power of node A and node B are the same. Furthermore, node A and node B are assumed to have the same receiver sensitivities. The first section of this sheet calculates the extended range if an external LNA is inserted in the receiver path of each node as it is shown in figure 5.10.b of the book. The sensitivity value in cell D4 is the sensitivity of each node before the external LNA is added to the node. In order to calculate the extended range, we need to have either one of the following information: 1. The receiver Noise Figure (NF) 2. The minimum SNR (db) that is required by the receiver demodulator to successfully recover the data Unfortunately, neither of the above information is typically provided in a transceiver datasheets. But you may ask the manufacturer to provide you with an estimate for either of these values. If you have the receiver NF, enter its value in cell D7. If you do not have the receiver NF, but you know the minimum SNR value, you can calculate the receiver NF by entering the minimum SNR value in cell D5. If none of these values are available, the minimum SNR may be estimated as a number between 0dB and 4dB. The higher the value of the minimum SNR is, the less range extension you will get. Therefore, as a conservative choice, you may set the value of the minimum SNR to 4dB if the actual value is unknown. The next input value is the signal bandwidth. You can use the value of the chip rate provided in table 1.1 of the book as an estimate for the bandwidth. For example, for 2.4GHz mode of operation, you can use 2MHz as the bandwidth. In practical implementation, however, the actual signal bandwidth is slightly less that the chip rate. For instance, in 2.4GHz mode of operation, the actual signal bandwidth may be as low as 1.6MHz instead of 2MHz. The smaller the signal bandwidth is, the more range extension you will get. If you do not have any information regarding the actual signal bandwidth, you can use the chip rates provided in table 1.1 of the book and the actual range extension may end up slightly better than your estimate. The external LNA Noise Figure and gain must be entered in cells D18 and D20 accordingly. Adding an external LNA may require an additional T/R switch. The loss due to the additional T/R switch must be entered in cell D22. The modified transceiver performances are in G18 to G26 cells. Scroll down the sheet to get to the second section, where an external PA is added to improve the range. The configuration is shown in figure 5.10.a of the book. This is a simple calculation and you only need the external PA gain. Scroll down further to the third section, where an external LNA and an external PA is added to each node. The configuration is shown in figure 5.10.c of the book. The extended range is calculated in cell G80. As an example, assume node A and node B have the following performances: Receiver sensitivity: -91dBm Receiver NF: 17dB Transmitter output power: 0dBm Frequency of operation: 2450MHz Signal actual bandwidth: 1.6MHz

For the effect of the environment, assume fade margin of 9dB and path loss exponent of 2.8. Then the range of nodes A and B (without any external LNA or PA) is 24 meters (cell G23). Now if an external LNA with 15dB of gain and 2dB of NF is added to the receiver, then the range will be improved to 59.4 meters (cell G25). If we remove the LNA and add a PA with 10dB gain to each node, the range will be improved from 24 meters to 54.7 meters (cell G50). Finally, if we add both the LNA and the PA, the range is improved to about 147 meters (cell G80). IEEE 802.15.4 nodes are mostly used for two way communications. If receiver sensitivities (or transmitter output powers) of node A and node B are not the same, you need to calculate the extended range for the following two scenarios: 1. Node A is transmitting and node B is receiving 2. Node B is transmitting and node A is receiving Then, the smaller of these two calculations will be the extended range. 3. Battery Life Analysis Click on the Battery life analysis tab of the spreadsheet. This is a very simple battery life calculator based on the materials discussed in chapter 6 of the book. Most battery datasheets provide the battery performance for continuous current applications. In many short-range wireless sensor networks the batteries are pulsed. Although the average current consumption of a device is low; the instantaneous current can be much higher than the average current. The current consumption profile affects the deliverable energy from a battery and affects the battery efficiency. The nominal battery capacity is entered in cell E4. The battery efficiency, which depends on your application scenario, should be entered in cell E5. Each battery loses portion of its capacity each month. This is referred to as Discharge per Month (DpM). The value of DpM is entered in cell E7. The next step is to define the application scenario. The steps 1-8 are examples of the steps in a possible use-case scenario. Feel free to modify the steps to customize the spreadsheet to your need. If the first communication attempt is not successful, steps 4-6 can be repeated multiple times. The number of additional attempts is specified in cell G21. The battery life plotted in graph 1 is based on the battery characteristics and the application scenario. The x-axis is the duration of the sleep time between the events. An event is the act of waking up, performing some duties and going back to sleep. The y-axis is the expected battery life for the given scenario. The minimum and maximum sleep time are entered in cells J4 and J5 respectively. The energy usage breakdown is shown in graph 2. The total energy consumed by the device is divided into four main categories. The active mode energy consumption is the energy dissipated by steps 2-7 of the event scenario at the top of the sheet. The sleep mode energy usage is mainly due to the device leakage and potentially the energy consumed by a timer. The battery self leakage is independent of the device performance and may vary considerably from one battery manufacturer to another. Graph 2 can be used to determine the dominant contributor to the battery life. For example, if the duty cycle is very low (i.e., the device is sleeping most of the time), the dominant factors may be the device leakage and the battery self leakage. On the other hand, if the

device is active most of the time, the device active current is the most important factor in the battery life. Scroll down the sheet to get to section 4. This is the section where battery life calculations are performed. Recalling from section 6.1 of the book, the duration of sleep time between the events can affect the battery efficiency due to the relaxation phenomenon. If you have the battery efficiency for various sleep durations, you can enter them in cells K78 to K86. If you are going to use the same battery efficiency for all sleep time durations, you can enter it in cell E5. The default values entered in cells K78 to K86 is the same is the same as E5, but feel free to change them to different values if necessary. If all you need to calculate is the battery life for specific sleep duration, you can use the last table at the bottom of section 4 of this sheet. 4. Matching Click on the Matching tab. This is simple calculator that can be used to determine the power transfer efficiency between the antenna and the transceiver based on materials discussed in section 5.9.5 of the book. The loss due to the non-ideal matching is also calculated in section 1 of this sheet. The refection coefficient is calculated from the equation below: Z Γ= Z T T Z + Z * A A where Γ is the reflection coefficient, Z T is the transceiver impedance, and Z A is the antenna impedance [1]. In section 5.9.4 of the book, it is discussed that the antenna-equivalent impedance changes with frequency, and because a transceiver is designed to perform optimally with certain antenna impedance, it is important to know whether or not the antenna impedance is close enough to the manufacturer-recommended value. To quantify close enough, the voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR) figure of merit is defined. Section 2 of this sheet calculates the VSWR, quantifying the deviation of the impedance from its nominal value. 5. FCC If you click on FCC tab, you will see a small calculator in the upper left corner of the sheet. This calculator is based on section 5.10.1 of the book. Microvolts per meter (µv/m) is the unit FCC uses to specify the maximum allowed strength of an electric field (E) created by a transmitter in the restricted bands. The µv/m unit can be converted to a more well-known unit such as dbm using this calculator. For example, the electric field limit of 500 µv/m at 3m is equivalent to -41.3 dbm transmitted power. Sections 2 and 3 of this sheet simply visualize the relative locations of the integer harmonics of the transmitted signal to the FCC restricted bands. For instance, all of the 2 nd order harmonics of an IEEE 802.15.4 transmitter operating at 2.4GHz band will fall into 4500-5150MHz FCC restricted band. However, the 2 nd order harmonics of a transmitter operating in 915MHz frequency band will not fall into any FCC restricted band.

More materials will be added to this sheet in future releases. References: [1] Nikitin P.V., et al, Power Reflection Coefficient Analysis for Complex Impedances in RFID Tag Design, IEEE Trans. On Microwave Theory and Tech., VOL. 53, NO. 9, Sep 2005 2721-2725 Revision history: Date Nov 3 rd 2008 Action Initial release