Antennas & Receivers in Radio Astronomy Mark McKinnon. Twelfth Synthesis Imaging Workshop 2010 June 8-15

Similar documents
Antennas and Receivers in Radio Astronomy

Antennas & Receivers in Radio Astronomy

Antennas. Greg Taylor. University of New Mexico Spring Astronomy 423 at UNM Radio Astronomy

Antennas. Greg Taylor. University of New Mexico Spring Astronomy 423 at UNM Radio Astronomy

EVLA Scientific Commissioning and Antenna Performance Test Check List

Signal Flow & Radiometer Equation. Aletha de Witt AVN-Newton Fund/DARA 2018 Observational & Technical Training HartRAO

School of Electrical Engineering. EI2400 Applied Antenna Theory Lecture 8: Reflector antennas

Richard Dodson 1/28/2014 NARIT-KASI Winter School

Aperture Antennas. Reflectors, horns. High Gain Nearly real input impedance. Huygens Principle

EVLA Front-End CDR. EVLA Ka-Band (26-40 GHz) Receiver

Submillimeter (continued)

Receiver Performance and Comparison of Incoherent (bolometer) and Coherent (receiver) detection

Fundamentals of the GBT and Single-Dish Radio Telescopes Dr. Ron Maddalena

Reflector antennas and their feeds

ATCA Antenna Beam Patterns and Aperture Illumination

Introduction to DSTV Dish Observations. Alet de Witt AVN Technical Training 2016

OPTICS OF SINGLE BEAM, DUAL BEAM & ARRAY RECEIVERS ON LARGE TELESCOPES J A M E S W L A M B, C A L T E C H

Progress Towards Coherent Multibeam Arrays

Introduction to Radio Astronomy!

G. Serra.

Evaluation of Suitable Feed Systemes

EVLA Antenna and Array Performance. Rick Perley

The TWIN-Radiotelescopes Wettzell;

LE/ESSE Payload Design

What does reciprocity mean

5 RECEIVERS TABLE TBD: EVLA RECEIVER FREQUENCY RANGES AND OPERATING TEMPERATURES

A Crash Course in Radio Astronomy and Interferometry: 1. Basic Radio/mm Astronomy

NATIONAL RADIO ASTRONOMY OBSERVATORY CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA. ELECTRONICS DIVISION INTERNAL REPORT No. 275 CRYOGENIC, HEMT, LOW-NOISE RECEIVERS

Aperture antennas. Ahmed FACHAR, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (Technical University of Madrid, UPM)

EVLA Memo 137 Performance Tests of the EVLA K, Ka, and Q-Band Receivers

Newsletter 4.4. Antenna Magus version 4.4 released! Array synthesis reflective ground plane addition. July 2013

Introduction to Radio Astronomy. Richard Porcas Max-Planck-Institut fuer Radioastronomie, Bonn

Phased Array Feeds A new technology for multi-beam radio astronomy

Aperture antennas. Andrés García, Francico José Cano, Alfonso Muñoz. (Technical University of Madrid, UPM)

EC ANTENNA AND WAVE PROPAGATION

The magnetic surface current density is defined in terms of the electric field at an aperture as follows: 2E n (6.1)

NMA Antenna and Receiver Concepts

Phased Array Feeds A new technology for wide-field radio astronomy

RADIATION PATTERNS. The half-power (-3 db) beamwidth is a measure of the directivity of the antenna.

REPORT ITU-R SA.2098

Chapter 41 Deep Space Station 13: Venus

ANTENNA INTRODUCTION / BASICS

INSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING Dundigal, Hyderabad ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNIACTION ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK

EVLA Front-End CDR. Overview & System Requirements

GBT Spectral Baseline Investigation Rick Fisher, Roger Norrod, Dana Balser (G. Watts, M. Stennes)

Receivers for. FFRF Tutorial by Tom Clark, NASA/GSFC & NVI Wettzell, March 19, 2009

BHARATHIDASAN ENGINEERING COLLEGE NATTARAMPALLI Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Unit 1

Antennas & wave Propagation ASSIGNMENT-I

Day 1 Session 2. Earth Station Technology

Holography Transmitter Design Bill Shillue 2000-Oct-03

ALMA Sensitivity Metric for Science Sustainability Projects

EVLA Project Book, Chapter 4 4 Antennas and Feeds. Jim Ruff, Ed Szpindor, S. Srikanth Last changed 2002-Feb-28

EVLA Memo #119 Wide-Band Sensitivity and Frequency Coverage of the EVLA and VLA L-Band Receivers

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 21 Jun 2006

Antenna Fundamentals. Microwave Engineering EE 172. Dr. Ray Kwok

C-band Circular Corrugated horn for the SRT. Beam Waveguide Focus. L. Cresci, P. Curioni, V. Natale, R. Nesti, A.Orfei, D. Panella, J.

ADVANCED 14/12 AND 30/20 GHz MULTIPLE BEAM ANTENNA TECHNOLOGY FOR COMMUNICATIONS SATELLITES

EVLA System Commissioning Results

CHAPTER 3 SIDELOBE PERFORMANCE OF REFLECTOR / ANTENNAS

Handbook of Reflector Antennas

Sub-millimeter Wave Planar Near-field Antenna Testing

Recent progress and future development of Nobeyama 45-m Telescope

ANTENNA INTRODUCTION / BASICS

Phased Array Feeds & Primary Beams

VLBI2010 Current status of the TWIN radio telescope project at Wettzell, Germany

PRIME FOCUS FEEDS FOR THE COMPACT RANGE

EVLA Receivers PDR. (4m, P,) L, S, C BAND RECEIVERS. AuthorDaniel (Mert) Mertely

Focal Plane Receiver Architecture for ASTE and Total Power Array of ALMA. Jung-Won Lee

W1GHZ W1GHZ W1GHZ W1GHZ W1GHZ W1GHZ W1GHZ W1GHZ

A NEW WIDEBAND DUAL LINEAR FEED FOR PRIME FOCUS COMPACT RANGES

Sources classification

Dr. John S. Seybold. November 9, IEEE Melbourne COM/SP AP/MTT Chapters

W1GHZ W1GHZ W1GHZ W1GHZ W1GHZ W1GHZ W1GHZ W1GHZ

New Trends on Receivers Development" May 30, 2005, Medicina. RECEIVING SYSTEMs for the ANTENNAS OPERATED by the INSTITUTE of RADIOASTRONOMY in ITALY

Antenna Measurement Uncertainty Method for Measurements in Compact Antenna Test Ranges

AN RF MONOPULSE ATTITUDE SENSING SYSTEM

MMA Memo 143: Report of the Receiver Committee for the MMA

Phased Array Feeds for the SKA. WP2.2.3 PAFSKA Consortium CSIRO ASTRON DRAO NRAO BYU OdP Nancay Cornell U Manchester

KULLIYYAH OF ENGINEERING

Antenna Fundamentals Basics antenna theory and concepts

A new K-band (18-26 GHz) 7-horn multi-feed receiver: Calibration campaign at Medicina 32 m dish

High Fidelity Imaging of Extended Sources. Rick Perley NRAO Socorro, NM

EVLA Technical Performance

Reflector Antenna, its Mount and Microwave. Absorbers for IIP Radiometer Experiments

Final Feed Selection Study For the Multi Beam Array System

essential requirements is to achieve very high cross-polarization discrimination over a

Atonnm. Lincoln Laboratory MASSACH1 SETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY. Technical Report TR A.J. Fenn S. Srikanth. 29 November 2004 ESC-TR

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BETWEEN CONICAL AND GAUSSIAN PROFILED HORN ANTENNAS

ALMA Interferometer and Band 7 Cartridge

L-Band and X-Band Antenna Design and Development for NeXtRAD

ngvla Technical Overview

Analysis and Compensation of Subreflector Displacement for the Parabolic Antenna of a Radio Telescope

EVLA Memo 103 Performance Tests of the EVLA K- and Q-Band Systems

Chapter 4 The RF Link

Noise generators. Spatial Combining of Multiple Microwave Noise Radiators NOISE ARRAY. This article reports on. experiments to increase the

Multiplying Interferometers

Final Examination. 22 April 2013, 9:30 12:00. Examiner: Prof. Sean V. Hum. All non-programmable electronic calculators are allowed.

RA3AQ Septum Feed Simulations

EEM.Ant. Antennas and Propagation

Figure 1 Photo of an Upgraded Low Band Receiver

Transcription:

Antennas & Receivers in Radio Astronomy Mark McKinnon 2010 June 8-15

Outline Context Types of antennas Antenna fundamentals Reflector antennas Mounts Optics Antenna performance Aperture efficiency Pointing Polarization Receivers 22

Importance of the Antenna Elements Antenna amplitude pattern causes amplitude to vary across the source. Antenna phase pattern causes phase to vary across the source. Polarization properties of the antenna modify the apparent polarization of the source. Antenna pointing errors can cause time varying amplitude and phase errors. Variation in noise pickup from the ground can cause time variable amplitude errors. Deformations of the antenna surface can cause amplitude and phase errors, especially at short wavelengths. 33

VLA @ 4.8 GHz (C-band) Interferometer Block Diagram Antenna Front End IF Key Amplifier Mixer X Correlato r Back End Correlator 44

55 Types of Antennas Wire antennas (λ 1m) Dipole Yagi Yagi Helix Helix Small arrays of the above (λ 1m) Reflector antennas ( λ 1m ) Hybrid antennas Wire reflectors Reflectors with dipole feeds

Basic Antenna Formulas Effective collecting area A(n,q,f) m2 P(θ, ϕ,ν ) A(θ, ϕ,ν ) I (θ, ϕ,ν )ΔνΔΩ On-axis response A0 = ha h = aperture efficiency Normalized pattern (primary beam) A(n,q,f) = A(n,q,f)/A0 Beam solid angle WA= A(n,q,f) dw all sky A0 WA = l2 l = wavelength, n = frequency 66

Aperture-Beam Fourier Transform Relationship What determines the beam shape? f(u,v) = complex aperture field distribution u,v = aperture coordinates (wavelengths) F(l,m) = complex far-field voltage pattern l = sinqcosf, m = sinqsinf F(l,m) = aperturef(u,v)exp(2pi(ul+vm))dudv f(u,v) = hemispheref(l,m)exp(-2pi(ul+vm))dldm For VLA: q3db = 1.02/D, First null = 1.22/D, D = reflector diameter in wavelengths 77

Antenna Mounts: Altitude over Azimuth Advantages Cost Gravity performance Disadvantages Zone of avoidance Beam rotates on sky 88

Beam Rotation on the Sky Parallactic angle 99

Antenna Mounts: Equatorial Advantages Tracking accuracy Beam doesn t rotate Disadvantages Cost Gravity performance Sources on horizon at pole 10

Reflector Optics Prime focus Offset Cassegrain Cassegrain focus Naysmith Dual Offset Beam Waveguide 11

Reflector Optics: Limitations Prime focus Over-illumination (spillover) can increase system temperature due to ground pick-up Number of receivers, and access to them, is limited Subreflector systems Can limit low frequency capability. Feed horn too large. Over-illumination by feed horn can exceed gain of refl ector s diffraction limited sidelobes Strong sources a few degrees away may limit image dynamic range Offset optics Support structure of offset feed is complex and expensive 12

Reflector Optics: Examples Prime focus (GMRT) Offset Cassegrain (VLA) Beam Waveguide (NRO) Cassegrain focus (AT) Naysmith (OVRO) Dual Offset (GBT) 13

Feed Systems GBT VLA EVLA 14

Antenna Performance: Aperture Efficiency On axis response: A0 = ha Efficiency: h = hsf. hbl. hs. ht. hmisc hsf = Reflector surface efficiency Due to imperfections in reflector surface rms error s hsf = exp(-(4ps/l)2) e.g., s = l/16, hsf = 0.5 hbl = Blockage efficiency Caused by subreflector and its support structure hs = Feed spillover efficiency Fraction of power radiated by feed intercepted by subreflector ht = Feed illumination efficiency Outer parts of reflector illuminated at lower level than inner part hmisc= Reflector diffraction, feed position phase errors, feed match and loss 15 15

Surface of ALMA Vertex Antenna Surface measurements of DV02 made with holography Measured surface rms =10um 16

Antenna Performance: Aperture Efficiency Primary Beam pdl l=sin(q), D = antenna diameter in wavelengths contours:-3,-6,-10,-15,-20,-25, -30,-35,-40 db db = 10log(power ratio) = 20log(voltage ratio) VLA: q3db = 1.02/D, First null = 1.22/D Voltage radiation pattern, F(l,m) 17

Antenna Pointing: Practical Considerations Subreflector mount Reflector structure Quadrupod El encoder Alidade structure Rail flatness Foundation Azimuth encoder 18

Pointing: ALMA Vertex Antennas All-sky optical pointing on DV07 completed April 1-14 All-sky results (spec = 2 RMS) 0.77 ± 0.12 RMS at OSF 0.84 ± 0.13 RMS scaled to AOS All-sky and offset pointing within specifications! DV07 pointing residuals: Mangum, N. Emerson, Mundnich & Stenvers 19

Antenna Performance: Pointing Dq Pointing Accuracy Dq = rms pointing error Often Dq < q3db /10 acceptable, because A(q3dB /10) ~ 0.97 q3db Primary beam A(q) BUT, at half power point in beam A(q3dB /2 ± q3db /10)/A(q3dB /2) = ±0.3 For best VLA pointing use Reference Pointing. Dq = 3 arcsec = q3db /17 @ 50 GHz 20

Antenna Performance: Polarization Antenna can modify apparent polarization properties of the source: Antenna structure Symmetry of the optics Reflections in the optics Curvature of the reflectors Quality of feed polarization splitter Constant across the beam Circularity of feed radiation patterns No instrumental polarization on-axis, But cross-polarization varies across the beam 21

Off-Axis Cross Polarization Cross-polarized aperture distribution Cross-polarized primary beam Field distribution in aperture of paraboloid fed by electric dipole VLA 4.8 GHz cross-polarized primary beam 22

Receivers: Noise Temperature Reference received power to the equivalent temperature of a matched load at the input to the receiver Rayleigh-Jeans approximation to Planck radiation law for a blackbody Pin = kbt (W) kb = Boltzman s constant (1.38*10-23 J/oK) When observing a radio source, Ttotal = TA + Tsys Tsys = system noise when not looking at a discrete radio source TA = source antenna temperature 23

Receivers: SEFD EVLA Sensitivities Band (GHz) TA = AS/(2kB) = KS S = source flux (Jy) SEFD = system equivalent flux density SEFD = Tsys/K (Jy) Tsys SEFD 1-2.50 21 236 2-4.62 27 245 4-8.60 28 262 8-12.56 31 311 12-18.54 37 385 18-26.51 55 606 26-40.39 58 836 40-50.34 78 1290 24

EVLA Q-Band (40-50 GHz) Receiver Dewar Dorado 4IWC45-1 Remove NRAO CDL RCP 40-50 GHz Post-AmpModule Caltech 3XM45-8.4-0.1L/R RF=40-50 GHz 40-50 GHz Magic-T MDL 22TH12B Pol Variable Attenuator NRAO Noise/COM NC 5222 ENR > 20 db Noise Diode TCal Old Some New Pamtech KYG2121-K2 (w/g) 18 dbm LO Splitter MAC Tech PA8207-2F 16.0-19.3 GHz Limiting LO Amplifier Norden N03-4010 16.0-19.5 GHz POut = 21.0 ± 0.5 dbm for ±6 dbm input x3 LNA LCP Isolator MICA T-708S40 8-18 GHz x3 35dB Atlantic Microwave AMC 1233 Septum Polarizer & Cal Coupler DC-Block Inmet 8055H 0.01-18 GHz 24dB LNA TCal Tripler/Mixer Assembly Spacek 3XM45-8.4-0.1L/R RF=40-50 GHz 35dB NRAO m B d 3 0 Integrated Isolator Dorado 4IWN45-1A (UG38 UG599) Isolator Mica T-610S10 10-20 GHz 24dB CDL Isolator Dorado 4IWN45-1A (UG38 UG599) Post-AmpModule Caltech 3XM45-8.4-0.1L/R RF=40-50 GHz Tripler/Mixer Assembly Spacek 3XM45-8.4-0.1L/R RF=40-50 GHz DC-Block Inmet 8055H 0.01-18 GHz Isolator MICA T-708S40 8-18 GHz New 25