REVISED - Census Tract Measures for Fragile Families Mothers and Fathers at Baseline. September 16, 2005

Similar documents
FOR SALE Bees Ferry Rd & Main Rd/Hunt Club Charleston, SC. $1,250, Acres

Calabrese Café

21,400 SF Pacific Hwy S. Kent, WA

Finding U.S. Census Data with American FactFinder Tutorial

Census Pro Documentation

United States Population

Census Response Rate, 1970 to 1990, and Projected Response Rate in 2000

Understanding the Census A Hands-On Training Workshop

The American Community Survey and the 2010 Census

Tanasbourne/Sunset Hwy Location

Quick Reference Guide

New Retail and Restaurant Space ADJACENT TO The Avenue Viera Viera (Melbourne), FL

Learning to Use the ACS for Transportation Planning Report on NCHRP Project 8-48

1990 Census Measures. Fast Track Project Technical Report Patrick S. Malone ( ; 9-May-00

American Community Survey Review and Tips for American Fact Finder. Sarah Ehresman Kentucky State Data Center August 7, 2014

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

Environmental Justice Tool Guide

3121 Edgar Brown Drive, West Orange, Texas 77630

Italian Americans by the Numbers: Definitions, Methods & Raw Data

ESP 171 Urban and Regional Planning. Demographic Report. Due Tuesday, 5/10 at noon

M N M + M ~ OM x(pi M RPo M )

The main focus of the survey is to measure income, unemployment, and poverty.

SELECTED SOCIAL CHARACTERISTICS IN THE UNITED STATES American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

FOR SALE 410 Columbiana Dr Columbia, SC. $1,750, Acres

National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. Public Use Contextual Database. Waves I and II. John O.G. Billy Audra T. Wenzlow William R.

Follow your family using census records

Geog 3340: Census Basics

An Introduction to ACS Statistical Methods and Lessons Learned

Who s in Your Neighborhood? Using the American FactFinder. Salma Abadin and Carrie Koss Vallejo Data You Can Use

9801 Bissonnet For Lease

Measuring Multiple-Race Births in the United States

THE EVALUATION OF THE BE COUNTED PROGRAM IN THE CENSUS 2000 DRESS REHEARSAL

Understanding and Using the U.S. Census Bureau s American Community Survey

Neighbourhood Profiles Census and National Household Survey

Documentation for April 1, 2010 Bridged-Race Population Estimates for Calculating Vital Rates

Census Data Determines Who Gets $300 Billion Annually Are You Getting Your Share?

2020 Census: Researching the Use of Administrative Records During Nonresponse Followup

How It Works and What s at Stake for Massachusetts. Wednesday, October 24, :30-10:30 a.m.

Using Administrative Records and the American Community Survey to Study the Characteristics of Undercounted Young Children in the 2010 Census

Census Data for Transportation Planning

Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Data and Mapping Tool (AFFH-T) Data Documentation

Acquiring and Using New Census Data to Understand Service Area, Gaps, and Need

Redistricting San Francisco: An Overview of Criteria, Data & Processes

2016 Election Impact on Cherokee County Voter Registration

Produced by the BPDA Research Division:

ONLINE APPENDIX: SUPPLEMENTARY ANALYSES AND ADDITIONAL ESTIMATES FOR. by Martha J. Bailey, Olga Malkova, and Zoë M. McLaren.

U.S. Census Bureau. Measuring America: People, Places, and Our Economy. Community Analysis Workshop. Armando Mendoza Data Dissemination Specialist

An Overview of the American Community Survey

Virginia Employment Commission

Census Data Tools. Hands-on exercises July 17 & 19, LULAC National Convention

Neighbourhood Profiles Census and National Household Survey

Virginia Employment Commission

Virginia Employment Commission

1 NOTE: This paper reports the results of research and analysis

Handout Packet. QuickFacts o Frequently Asked Questions

Public Use Microdata Sample Files Data Note 1

1980 Census 1. 1, 2, 3, 4 indicate different levels of racial/ethnic detail in the tables, and provide different tables.

Working with United States Census Data. K. Mitchell, 7/23/2016 (no affiliation with U.S. Census Bureau)

Overview of Demographic Data

Dallas Regional Office US Census Bureau

Census Data Access Workshop Census Data On A Dealine

How Will the Changing U.S. Census Affect Decision-Making?

Some Indicators of Sample Representativeness and Attrition Bias for BHPS and Understanding Society

Population and dwellings Number of people counted Total population

Finding and Using Census Data

Population and dwellings Number of people counted Total population

1543 Delplaza Drive. Office 515-1,545 SF. For more information: Evan Scroggs Property Features.

Welcome to: A Tour of Data Sources from the U.S. Census Bureau. Monday, October 19, :00 am 12:00 noon CT

My Tribal Area: Census Data Overview & Access. Eric Coyle Data Dissemination Specialist U.S. Census Bureau

Austria Documentation

Comparing the Quality of 2010 Census Proxy Responses with Administrative Records

Using Administrative Records for Imputation in the Decennial Census 1

Sampling, Part 2. AP Statistics Chapter 12

Using registers E-enumeration and CAPI Electronic map. Census process. E-enumeration. Census moment and census period E-enumeration process

2011 National Household Survey (NHS): design and quality

The American Community Survey. An Esri White Paper August 2017

Trends, Data and Definitions The Household Reference Person. Greg Ball BSPS Council & independent consultant

Table 5 Population changes in Enfield, CT from 1950 to Population Estimate Total

FOR SALE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT LAND

Supplement No. 7 published with Gazette No. 18 dated 30 August, THE STATISTICS LAW (1996 REVISION) THE CENSUS (CAYMAN ISLANDS) ORDER, 2010

Census Overview: Terminology & Definitions. Basics, Decennial, ACS, and Estimates. Census Datafiles

Reference Guide for Journalists: Using the American Community Survey

Appendix to the Greater Louisville Project 2015 Competitive City Update: Louisville A Focus on Poverty

Population A Review of Census Data Related to the Population of Allen County, Indiana

1. Do you live in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania? 2. Is your annual household income more than $50,000? 3. Do you have a paying job?

LAND FOR SALE. Vacant Land, 7.78 acres, in northeast Springfield 2296 N. Arbor Creek Lane, Springfield, MO 65803

Lilian Ogari, PhD, MPH and David Sweat, MPH Chief of Epidemiology and Infectious Diseases Shelby County Health Department

PROBABILITY-BASED SAMPLING USING Split-Frames with Listed Households

Scenario 5: Family Structure

LEASE. Retail Division PAD OPPORTUNITIES FOR LEASE ESTIMATED DELIVERY: Q FOR KRIKORIAN CINEMAS PLAZA AT MENIFEE TOWN CENTER

Methodology Statement: 2011 Australian Census Demographic Variables

1999 AARP Funeral and Burial Planners Survey. Summary Report

Taming the Census TIGER:

Convoy Street, San Diego, CA 92111

United Nations Demographic Yearbook Data Collection System

New AC Hotels by Marriott - Restaurant Space Available E Market Street Louisville, KY

Statistical Issues of Interpretation of the American Community Survey s One-, Three-, and Five-Year Period Estimates

Sierra Leone - Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey 2017

Gentrification and Graffiti in Harlem

Transcription:

REVISED - Census Tract Measures for Fragile Families Mothers and Fathers at Baseline September 16, 2005 The ffgeo_0b5.dta file contains tract-level census data for the tracts where the Fragile Families mothers and fathers lived at the time of the baseline interview. This is an update to a previously released tract measure data set, ffgeo_0b1.dta. The baseline interviews were conducted from 1998 to 2000, and the tract characteristics are taken from the 2000 US Census. Please note that while the baseline interviews were conducted in 15 states, the census data on this file are from 27 states. This means that some parents did not live in the state where the mother gave birth. Updates from the previous release The previous release of the baseline census tract measures was ffgeo_0b1.dta (versions b2 through b4 were not released). The following changes were made from the previous file: Tract-level measures were added for 73 mothers and 54 fathers. The mean number of persons per household in the tract (tm1mpphh and tf1mpphh) has been significantly revised. The following variables have been dropped: tm1nfams, tm1npers, tm1nhisp, tm1nwhte, tm1nblck, tm1mamin, tm1nasia, tm1npaci, tm1nother, and their tf1* counterparts. There are no raw numbers included on this file. All measures are either percents, means, or medians. The poverty line variables (tm1n50pl through tm1n200p, and their tf1* counterparts) have been revised. They are now percents rather than raw numbers. The denominator for these percents is all persons for whom a poverty status has been determined. The variables tm1tract and tf1tract have been changed. File layout The file contains 4,898 observations (one per FF family) and is sorted by idnum. In addition to idnum, there are 94 tract-level variables. The 47 mothers tract characteristics appear first, followed by the 47 fathers tract characteristics. Missing values Census data is available for 4,725 mothers (96% of baseline respondents) and 4,069 fathers (83%). Census tract information is missing for 173 mothers and 829 fathers due to incomplete address information, refusal, nonresponse, and residence outside the US. In addition, some mothers and fathers may be missing information on individual tract characteristics, such as when the denominator of a percent was zero. Missing values on this file are not represented by negative codes. Tract numbers To protect the privacy of the respondents, their actual state, county, and tract of residence are not included on this file. The variables tm1tract and tf1tract included on the file are not actual census tracts,

but are provided to indicate which respondents live in the same census tract. There is no county or state information embedded in tm1tract and tf1tract. The tract numbers have been revised since the previous release of the baseline census tract characteristics. The tract numbers are consistent between mothers and fathers and across waves. Thus, they can be used as an indicator of whether the respondents have stayed in the same neighborhood from one survey wave to the next. Please note that while the baseline interviews were conducted in 15 states, there are census tracts from 27 states represented on this file. This means that even at baseline, some parents lived outside the state in which the mother gave birth. Random noise in the data Some random noise has been introduced into the data to ensure that respondents census tracts cannot be identified on the basis of the characteristics provided in this file. This noise should have no impact on analyses. Variable naming convention Variable names are a maximum of 8 characters long. The first four characters are a prefix, described below, and the last four characters are an abbreviated description of the tract characteristic. The prefixes are constructed as follows: Position Character Indicates 1 t tract-level measure 2 m mother s tract characteristic f father s tract characteristic 3 1 the tract is from the wave 1 (baseline) address 4 p the characteristic is a percent m the characteristic is a median or mean Examples Census tract measures tf1phisp is the percent of the population in the father s census tract at baseline that is Hispanic tm1mrent is the median monthly gross rent in the mother s census tract at baseline The census tract measures on this file are taken from Summary Files 1 and 3 of the 2000 Census. Each measure is provided separately for mothers and fathers. The following census tract characteristics are included on the file (listed below for mothers; the fathers variables are similar but are prefixed by tf1 rather than tm1):

Demographics tm1phisp Percent of population Hispanic tm1pwhte Percent of population non-hispanic White tm1pblck Percent of population non-hispanic Black tm1pamin Percent of population non-hispanic American Indian/Native American tm1pasia Percent of population non-hispanic Asian tm1ppaci Percent of population non-hispanic Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander tm1pothr Percent of population non-hispanic other race tm1pfrgn Percent foreign born tm1pchbr Percent of female population of childbearing age (15-49) tm1pfhhr Percent of family HHs with kids <18 headed by females tm1mpphh Mean number of persons per HH Education tm1psch tm1p25hs tm1p25b Percent of pop 16-19 enrolled in school Percent of 25+ population with HS+ educ Percent of 25+ population with bachelor's or higher Employment tm1pemp tm1puemp Percent of civilian labor force (16+) employed Percent of civilian labor force (16+) unemployed Housing conditions and rent tm1pvach Percent of housing units vacant tm1pbf40 Percent of housing units built before 1940 tm1prent Percent of occupied housing units renter-occupied tm1pnoph Percent of occupied housing units without phone service tm1pplum Percent of housing units lacking complete plumbing tm1mrphi Median gross rent as percent of HH income, 1999 tm1mrent Median monthly gross rent, 1999 tm1mhval Median housing value, 1999 tm1myear Median year housing structure built Income and public assistance tm1ppuba Percent of households on public assistance tm1pfbpl Percent of families below poverty level in 1999 tm1pb10k Percent of families with 1999 income <$10K tm1p1014 Percent of families with 1999 income $10K to $14,999 tm1p1524 Percent of families with 1999 income $15K to $24,999 tm1p2534 Percent of families with 1999 income $25K to $34,999 tm1p3549 Percent of families with 1999 income $35K to $49,999 tm1p5074 Percent of families with 1999 income $50K to $74,999

tm1p7599 Percent of families with 1999 income $75K to $99,999 tm1p100k Percent of families with 1999 income $100K to $149,999 tm1p150k Percent of families with 1999 income $150K+ tm1mhinc Median HH income in 1999 tm1p50pl Percent of persons with income less than.50 of poverty line tm1p74pl Percent of persons with income.50 to.74 of poverty line tm1p99pl Percent of persons with income.75 to.99 of poverty line tm1p124p Percent of persons with income 1.00 to 1.24 of poverty line tm1p149p Percent of persons with income 1.25 to 1.49 of poverty line tm1p174p Percent of persons with income 1.50 to 1.74 of poverty line tm1p184p Percent of persons with income 1.75 to 1.84 of poverty line tm1p199p Percent of persons with income 1.85 to 1.99 of poverty line tm1p200p Percent of persons with income 2.00 & over poverty line Note: The denominator of the poverty status variables tm1p50pl tm1p200p is the number persons in the tract whose poverty status has been determined.

Census Tract Measures for Fragile Families Mothers and Fathers at 12-Month Followup September 16, 2005 The ffgeo_12b1.dta file contains tract-level Census 2000 data for the tracts where the Fragile Families mothers and fathers lived at the time of the first followup interview. The census data on this file are from 44 states. This is the first release of tract characteristics for the 12-month data. File layout The file contains 4,898 observations (one per FF family) and is sorted by idnum. In addition to idnum, there are 94 tract-level variables. The 47 mothers tract characteristics appear first, followed by the 47 fathers tract characteristics. Missing values Census data for the parents tracts of residence at 12-months is available for 4,262 mothers and 3,616 fathers. Census tract information is missing for 636 mothers and 1,282 fathers due to incomplete address information, refusal, nonresponse, lack of participation in the survey wave, and residence outside the US. In addition, some mothers and fathers may be missing information on individual tract characteristics, such as when the denominator of a percent was zero. Missing values on this file are not represented by negative codes. Tract numbers To protect the privacy of the respondents, their actual state, county, and tract of residence are not included on this file. The variables tm2tract and tf2tract included on the file are not actual census tracts, but are provided to indicate which respondents live in the same census tract. There is no county or state information embedded in tm2tract and tf2tract. The tract numbers are consistent between mothers and fathers and across waves. Thus, they can be used as an indicator of whether the respondents have stayed in the same neighborhood from one survey wave to the next. Random noise in the data Some random noise has been introduced into the data to ensure that respondents census tracts cannot be identified on the basis of the characteristics provided in this file. This noise should have no impact on analyses. Variable naming convention Variable names are a maximum of 8 characters long. The first four characters are a prefix, described below, and the last four characters are an abbreviated description of the tract characteristic. The prefixes are constructed as follows: Position Character Indicates

1 t tract-level measure 2 m mother s tract characteristic f father s tract characteristic 3 2 the tract is from the wave 2 (12-month followup) address 4 p the characteristic is a percent m the characteristic is a median or mean Examples Census tract measures tf2phisp is the percent of the population in the father s census tract at 12 months that is Hispanic tm2mrent is the median monthly gross rent in the mother s census tract at 12 months The census tract measures on this file are taken from Summary Files 1 and 3 of the 2000 Census. Each measure is provided separately for mothers and fathers. The following census tract characteristics are included on the file (listed below for mothers; the fathers variables are similar but are prefixed by tf2 rather than tm2): Demographics tm2phisp Percent of population Hispanic tm2pwhte Percent of population non-hispanic White tm2pblck Percent of population non-hispanic Black tm2pamin Percent of population non-hispanic American Indian/Native American tm2pasia Percent of population non-hispanic Asian tm2ppaci Percent of population non-hispanic Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander tm2pothr Percent of population non-hispanic other race tm2pfrgn Percent foreign born tm2pchbr Percent of female population of childbearing age (15-49) tm2pfhhr Percent of family HHs with kids <18 headed by females tm2mpphh Mean number of persons per HH Education tm2psch tm2p25hs tm2p25b Percent of pop 16-19 enrolled in school Percent of 25+ population with HS+ educ Percent of 25+ population with bachelor's or higher Employment tm2pemp tm2puemp Percent of civilian labor force (16+) employed Percent of civilian labor force (16+) unemployed

Housing conditions and rent tm2pvach Percent of housing units vacant tm2pbf40 Percent of housing units built before 1940 tm2prent Percent of occupied housing units renter-occupied tm2pnoph Percent of occupied housing units without phone service tm2pplum Percent of housing units lacking complete plumbing tm2mrphi Median gross rent as percent of HH income, 1999 tm2mrent Median monthly gross rent, 1999 tm2mhval Median housing value, 1999 tm2myear Median year housing structure built Income and public assistance tm2ppuba Percent of households on public assistance tm2pfbpl Percent of families below poverty level in 1999 tm2pb10k Percent of families with 1999 income <$10K tm2p1014 Percent of families with 1999 income $10K to $14,999 tm2p1524 Percent of families with 1999 income $15K to $24,999 tm2p2534 Percent of families with 1999 income $25K to $34,999 tm2p3549 Percent of families with 1999 income $35K to $49,999 tm2p5074 Percent of families with 1999 income $50K to $74,999 tm2p7599 Percent of families with 1999 income $75K to $99,999 tm2p100k Percent of families with 1999 income $100K to $149,999 tm2p150k Percent of families with 1999 income $150K+ tm2mhinc Median HH income in 1999 tm2p50pl Percent of persons with income less than.50 of poverty line tm2p74pl Percent of persons with income.50 to.74 of poverty line tm2p99pl Percent of persons with income.75 to.99 of poverty line tm2p124p Percent of persons with income 1.00 to 1.24 of poverty line tm2p149p Percent of persons with income 1.25 to 1.49 of poverty line tm2p174p Percent of persons with income 1.50 to 1.74 of poverty line tm2p184p Percent of persons with income 1.75 to 1.84 of poverty line tm2p199p Percent of persons with income 1.85 to 1.99 of poverty line tm2p200p Percent of persons with income 2.00 & over poverty line Note: The denominator of the poverty status variables tm2p50pl tm2p200p is the number persons in the tract whose poverty status has been determined.

Census Tract Measures for Fragile Families Mothers and Fathers at 30-Month Followup September 16, 2005 The ffgeo_30b4.dta file contains tract-level Census 2000 data for the tracts where the Fragile Families mothers and fathers lived at the time of the second followup interview. The census data on this file are from 44 states. This is the first release of tract characteristics for the 30-month data (versions ffgeo_30b1 through ffgeo_30b3 were not released). File layout The file contains 4,898 observations (one per FF family) and is sorted by idnum. In addition to idnum, there are 94 tract-level variables. The 47 mothers tract characteristics appear first, followed by the 47 fathers tract characteristics. Missing values Census data for the parents tracts of residence at 30 months is available for 4,078 mothers and 3,268 fathers. Census tract information is missing for 820 mothers and 1,630 fathers due to incomplete address information, refusal, nonresponse, lack of participation in the survey wave, and residence outside the US. In addition, some mothers and fathers may be missing information on individual tract characteristics, such as when the denominator of a percent was zero. Missing values on this file are not represented by negative codes. Tract numbers To protect the privacy of the respondents, their actual state, county, and tract of residence are not included on this file. The variables tm3tract and tf3tract included on the file are not actual census tracts, but are provided to indicate which respondents live in the same census tract. There is no county or state information embedded in tm3tract and tf3tract. The tract numbers are consistent between mothers and fathers and across waves. Thus, they can be used as an indicator of whether the respondents have stayed in the same neighborhood from one survey wave to the next. Random noise in the data Some random noise has been introduced into the data to ensure that respondents census tracts cannot be identified on the basis of the characteristics provided in this file. This noise should have no impact on analyses. Variable naming convention Variable names are a maximum of 8 characters long. The first four characters are a prefix, described below, and the last four characters are an abbreviated description of the tract characteristic. The prefixes are constructed as follows:

Position Character Indicates 1 t tract-level measure 2 m mother s tract characteristic f father s tract characteristic 3 3 the tract is from the wave 3 (30-month followup) address 4 p the characteristic is a percent m the characteristic is a median or mean Examples Census tract measures Tf3phisp is the percent of the population in the father s census tract at 30 months that is Hispanic Tm3mrent is the median monthly gross rent in the mother s census tract at 30 months The census tract measures on this file are taken from Summary Files 1 and 3 of the 2000 Census. Each measure is provided separately for mothers and fathers. The following census tract characteristics are included on the file (listed below for mothers; the fathers variables are similar but are prefixed by tf3 rather than tm3): Demographics tm3phisp Percent of population Hispanic tm3pwhte Percent of population non-hispanic White tm3pblck Percent of population non-hispanic Black tm3pamin Percent of population non-hispanic American Indian/Native American tm3pasia Percent of population non-hispanic Asian tm3ppaci Percent of population non-hispanic Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander tm3pothr Percent of population non-hispanic other race tm3pfrgn Percent foreign born tm3pchbr Percent of female population of childbearing age (15-49) tm3pfhhr Percent of family HHs with kids <18 headed by females tm3mpphh Mean number of persons per HH Education tm3psch tm3p25hs tm3p25b Percent of pop 16-19 enrolled in school Percent of 25+ population with HS+ educ Percent of 25+ population with bachelor's or higher Employment tm3pemp Percent of civilian labor force (16+) employed

tm3puemp Percent of civilian labor force (16+) unemployed Housing conditions and rent tm3pvach Percent of housing units vacant tm3pbf40 Percent of housing units built before 1940 tm3prent Percent of occupied housing units renter-occupied tm3pnoph Percent of occupied housing units without phone service tm3pplum Percent of housing units lacking complete plumbing tm3mrphi Median gross rent as percent of HH income, 1999 tm3mrent Median monthly gross rent, 1999 tm3mhval Median housing value, 1999 tm3myear Median year housing structure built Income and public assistance tm3ppuba Percent of households on public assistance tm3pfbpl Percent of families below poverty level in 1999 tm3pb10k Percent of families with 1999 income <$10K tm3p1014 Percent of families with 1999 income $10K to $14,999 tm3p1524 Percent of families with 1999 income $15K to $24,999 tm3p2534 Percent of families with 1999 income $25K to $34,999 tm3p3549 Percent of families with 1999 income $35K to $49,999 tm3p5074 Percent of families with 1999 income $50K to $74,999 tm3p7599 Percent of families with 1999 income $75K to $99,999 tm3p100k Percent of families with 1999 income $100K to $149,999 tm3p150k Percent of families with 1999 income $150K+ tm3mhinc Median HH income in 1999 tm3p50pl Percent of persons with income less than.50 of poverty line tm3p74pl Percent of persons with income.50 to.74 of poverty line tm3p99pl Percent of persons with income.75 to.99 of poverty line tm3p124p Percent of persons with income 1.00 to 1.24 of poverty line tm3p149p Percent of persons with income 1.25 to 1.49 of poverty line tm3p174p Percent of persons with income 1.50 to 1.74 of poverty line tm3p184p Percent of persons with income 1.75 to 1.84 of poverty line tm3p199p Percent of persons with income 1.85 to 1.99 of poverty line tm3p200p Percent of persons with income 2.00 & over poverty line Note: The denominator of the poverty status variables tm3p50pl tm3p200p is the number persons in the tract whose poverty status has been determined.