Innogy Renewables UK Ltd i Harryburn Wind Farm: ES Technical Appendix 8.6: Bird Collision Modelling April 2017

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Innogy Renewables UK Ltd i Harryburn Wind Farm: ES Technical Appendix 8.6: Bird Collision Modelling April 2017"

Transcription

1 Harryburn Wind Farm Technical Appendix 8.6 Bird Collision Modelling Ref: April 2017 Ref: Version No: Final April 2017

2 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd i CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION METHODOLOGY The Prediction of Rotor Transits from Vantage Point Survey Data Undertaking CRM RESULTS Flightline data Species input data CRM Results REFERENCES CLOSURE Annex A ANNEXES Collision Mortality Calculations

3 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of Collision Risk Modelling (CRM) undertaken for 14 bird species to inform the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for the proposed Harryburn Wind Farm. The exact make, type and model of turbine to be used as part of the proposed development will be the result of a future tendering process and therefore an indicative candidate turbine model has been assumed for this assessment. Modelling was therefore based on the use of 17 Vestas V MW turbines, each with a rotor diameter of 117m and hub height of 91.5m, which is consistent with the information outlined in Chapter 3: Description of the Development. Where there was sufficient bird flight activity within the Collision Risk Zone (CRZ) (i.e. within the Wind Farm Polygon (WP 1 )) at Potential Collision Height (PCH), collision risk modelling (CRM) was used to predict the number of individuals per target species that might collide with the wind turbine rotors. Sufficient flight activity was defined as a total of three flights or ten individuals at PCH in the CRZ. Target species were agreed during the EIA scoping process and included: All wild goose, swan and duck species, with the exception of Canada goose Branta canadensis; Black grouse Tetrao tetrix; All raptors and owls listed on Annex I of the Birds Directive or Schedule 1 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended); Kestrel Falco tinnunculus; and All wader species. Further details regarding the methodology used, including details of assumptions used and any corrections applied, are provided in Section 2. The monitoring results are presented in Section 3 and copies of the modelling calculations for each species modelled are included in Annex A. 1 The Wind Farm Polygon includes the area within 200m of the outermost turbine blades.

4 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd METHODOLOGY The standard Band CRM (Band et. al. 2007) was used to estimate collision risk based on recorded target species activity levels and flight behaviour, proposed turbine numbers and specifications, and the relevant species biometrics and flight characteristics. Modelling collision risk under the Band CRM is a two-stage process. Stage 1 estimates the number of birds that fly through the rotor swept disc. Stage 2 predicts the proportion of these birds that would be hit by a rotor blade. Combining both stages produces an estimate of collision mortality in the absence of any avoiding action by birds. Avoidance rates are then applied to generate predicted rates of collision mortality. 2.1 Prediction of Rotor Transits from Vantage Point Survey Data Bird Flight Data The number of birds that fly through the rotor swept disc was estimated using flight data gathered during baseline studies carried out between April 2014 and May 2016 (see ES Technical Appendices 8.2, 8.3, 8.4 & 8.5). These surveys gathered data from ten vantage points (VP), six of which cover the proposed turbine layout (the proposed layout was decided following a number of design iterations, in response to environmental and technical constraints identified during the EIA process and as such some of the VPs used effectively became redundant). In order to select flights liable to incur a potential risk of collision; i.e. within the areas occupied by proposed turbines, the CRM used only observations collected within the WP defined by a 256m buffer (centred on the turbine tower) around the proposed outermost turbine locations. The size of buffer follows Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH) guidance in order to take into account rotor blade length and potential spatial errors in flight recording accuracy. It is known that bird detection rates vary between species. To ensure the CRM used robust measures of flight activity, a 2km distance truncation was used in the viewshed (i.e. the area visible) from each VP (as per SNH guidance). Analysis in GIS identified those flights that were at PCH and over the WP. Flight times that were used in the CRM were derived from field data for each flight. Where only part of the relevant flight line occurred within the WP the flight time was calculated based on the proportion of the flight recorded within the WP, assuming a constant speed for each flight. Time spent at different flight heights was estimated in a database from interval data for flights that entered the WP. Flying time estimated to occur within the m survey recording bands (see Section 2.1.2) was used to determine the period that target species were at risk of collision with the rotors Correcting Survey PCH to Actual PCH Turbine parameters for the proposed development were changed both during and after baseline VP surveys were completed. The baseline surveys utilised the following height bands: 2014 Breeding Season; Non-breeding Season Height Band A: 0-25m Height Band B: 25-45m Height Band C: m Height Band D: >125m

5 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Breeding Season; Non-breeding Season Height Band A: 0-25m Height Band B: 25-45m Height Band C: m Height Band D: m Height Band E: >145m As such, the height bands used to record flight activity do not correspond precisely to PCH for the proposed development (38-150m). In particular, height band B (25-45m) overlaps with the lower limit of the current PCH. In 2014, the upper survey height band D (>125 m) was below the top of the actual PCH, as was height band D ( m) and the lowest 5m of height band E (>145m) in 2015/16. It was therefore necessary to make assumptions about the distribution of some of the flight heights recorded. With regard to height band E in 2015/16, all these data were excluded from the CRM as it is highly likely that the majority of these flights would be above 150m and it is not possible to apportion flights within the lowest 5m part of this height band. With regard to height band D in (>125m), rather than include or exclude all of this dataset from the CRM, it is probable that a proportion of the flights recorded in height band D was in the range m. To estimate this, it is assumed that the percentage of flights in the m portion in 2014/15 was similar to the survey data in height band D obtained during the surveys in 2015/16. This proportion was calculated for each species and correction factors applied to the 2014/15 height band D dataset. With regard to height band B, the number of birds at PCH was assumed to be the same as the proportion of the height band that is within PCH (i.e. (45-38)/(45-25) = 35%) Seasonal Definitions For each species modelled, CRMs were constructed using data from the relevant breeding and non-breeding season periods 2 (Table 2-1). To estimate breeding season mortality, the relevant data from both years were combined into one model and likewise for non-breeding season data. To estimate annual mortality, this was done separately by combining all the data into a separate model rather than simply adding the breeding season and non-breeding season results together (so that the result could be weighted by observation effort across all seasons). 2 Breeding season dates sourced from SNH (

6 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Species name Whooper Swan* Table 2-1: Modelled Species Breeding and Non-breeding Season Periods Pink-footed Goose* Scientific name Cygnus cygnus Anser brachyrhynchu s Breeding season start Breeding season end Non-breeding season start Non-breeding season end 01-Apr 31-Aug 01-Sep 31-Mar 01-Apr 31-Aug 01-Sep 31-Mar Red Kite Milvus milvus 01-Mar 31-Jul 01-Aug 28-Feb Hen Harrier Goshawk Osprey Kestrel Merlin Peregrine Golden Plover Lapwing Snipe Curlew Short-eared Owl Circus cyaneus Accipiter gentilis Pandion haliaetus Falco tinnunculus Falco columbarius Falco peregrinus Pluvialis apricaria Vanellus vanellus Gallinago gallinago Numenius arquata 15-Mar 15-Aug 16-Aug 14-Mar 15-Mar 15-Aug 16-Aug 14-Mar 01-Apr 31-Aug 01-Sep 31-Mar 01-Mar 15-Aug 16-Aug 28-Feb 01-Apr 15-Aug 16-Aug 31-Mar 01-Mar 15-Aug 16-Aug 28-Feb 01-Apr 31-Jul 01-Aug 31-Mar 01-Mar 31-Jul 01-Aug 28-Feb 01-Apr 15-Aug 16-Aug 31-Mar 01-Apr 31-Jul 01-Aug 31-Mar Asio flammeus 01-Mar 15-Aug 16-Aug 28-Feb * For simplicity, whooper swan and pink-footed goose flights from April & May were excluded rather than extending the non-breeding period. The number of flights recorded during April and May was relatively small and therefore, if anything, the CRM is likely to have overestimated the number of collisions for these species. The theoretical time that birds could be active with potential for turbine collisions was assumed to be the period between dawn and dusk within each survey period (determined from civil twilight data for the Site 3 ). 2.2 Undertaking CRM The following parameters were entered into the modelling spreadsheet, which was downloaded from the SNH website ( Natural Research): 3

7 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd The total observation effort within the risk volume (V w ) visible from each VP; The occupancy total: the total time spent by a particular species flying within the risk volume (V w ) visible from each VP; The volume of Vw (m 3 ) visible from each VP (this is area covered by the outermost turbines without the 200m buffer); An estimation of average daylight hours within the season of analysis; Species-specific bird parameters (Section 2.2.2); and Wind farm parameters (Section 2.2.3). The SNH CRM spreadsheet 4 calculates the probability of collision for each particular species. The model then combines this probability of collision with the observed flight activity per unit area (hours per hectare) weighted for observation effort from each VP to produce an estimate of the number of transits through the rotor blades. Mortality estimates are then derived by applying species-specific avoidance rates (Section 2.2.2) Simultaneous VP Surveys within Overlapping Viewsheds Viewshed analysis was undertaken by Jacobs (see ES Technical Appendix 8.2). Using this information the amount of overlapping between the viewsheds (at 25m above ground level, which coincides with the lowest height band used to select flights for CRM) of VPs 1-6 (i.e. those used to cover the WP) was calculated. This is summarised in Table 2-2. In situations where there is no simultaneous coverage of the overlapping viewsheds, the Band model takes this into account through a weighting process which factors in the observation effort from each VP. Viewshed A Area (in ha) Table 2-2: Areas of Overlap between VPs Overlapped by Viewshed B Viewshed total area (in ha) Overlap (in ha) % of area of visibility from Viewshed A VP VP % 1.7% VP VP % 47.1% VP VP % 20.2% VP VP % 8.8% VP VP % 0.1% VP VP % 9.7% VP VP % 27.6% VP VP % 5.5% % of area of visibility from Viewshed B However, as described in ES Technical Appendices , some simultaneous survey of overlapping viewsheds was unavoidable, primarily for access-related reasons (in that the survey area was only able to be accessed for a limited number of days each month). There were also health and safety issues at the Site such as needing to maintain radio contact with other surveyors, which was only possible from within a certain distance). The numbers of simultaneous VP surveys affected by overlapping viewsheds are shown in Table

8 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Table 2-3: Numbers of Simultaneous VP Surveys affected by Overlapping Viewsheds Viewshed A Viewshed B Numbers of surveys affected/ total number of surveys Breeding season 2014 Non-breeding season 2014/15 Breeding season 2015 VP 1 VP 4 12/20 2/36 4/42 2/60 VP 1 VP 5 0/20 4/36 6/42 2/61 VP 1 VP 6 0/20 4/37 0/42 0/60 VP 2 VP 3 0/20 4/36 6/42 2/61 VP 2 VP 5 0/20 0/36 4/42 2/61 VP 3 VP 4 4/20 0/36 0/42 0/61 VP 4 VP 5 2/20 0/36 0/42 0/61 VP 5 VP 6 0/20 0/37 2/42 4/61 Nonbreeding season 2015/16 Several issues might arise as a consequence of simultaneous surveys of overlapping VPs. These include: Double counting of target species flights - to address this any flights of the same target species that were simultaneously observed during surveys from overlapping VPs were excluded from further analysis. Disturbance of birds within adjacent viewsheds, particularly where VP locations are within the Site this could bias survey data through causing unnatural flight behaviour or result in birds leaving the survey area. During surveys within the Site, the potential for disturbance was significantly reduced by conducting surveys from within or adjacent to a vehicle along estate tracks, as described in ES Technical Appendices Miscalculation of mortality estimates may occur in instances where the same area is observed simultaneously from different VPs resulting in a doubling of the observation effort for the overlapping portion. The extent of this is described below. Using the areas of overlap presented in Table 2-2 an estimation of the observation effort (expressed as Hectare Hours, HaHr) in overlapping viewsheds affected by simultaneous surveys has been derived (Table 2-4). This has been estimated by multiplying the area of overlap in each case by the number of simultaneous surveys (Table 2-3) converted to hours. A worst case scenario was adopted whereby it was assumed that each overlapping survey was 3 hours in duration (in reality this was often not the case with the period of overlap being less than 3 hours). Therefore, for example, for VP1 and VP4 the total number of surveys affected across all four survey seasons was 20 (10 from VP1 and 10 from VP4) which resulted in an affected survey time of 60 hours.

9 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Table 2-4: Estimation of Observation Effort (HaHr) Affected by Simultaneous VP Surveys Viewshed A Viewshed B Overlap (ha) No. of overlapping surveys (hrs) HaHr Total 9186 When taken as a proportion of the overall observation effort for all seasons (e.g. 173, annual HaHr for red kite, see Annex A) this equates to 5.29% of observation effort being affected by simultaneous surveys within overlapping viewsheds. Even in this worst case scenario, this level of error is unlikely to produce any significant changes to the magnitude of the resulting collision risk predictions Bird Biometrics and Avoidance Rates Measurements and flight speeds of the species for which CRM was undertaken were derived from Provan & Whitfield (2006) and Bruderer & Boldt (2001). These are detailed in Table 2-5 below, along with the avoidance rate used (SNH 2016).

10 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Table 2-5: Bird Biometrics and Avoidance Rates used in CRM Species name Bird length (m) Wingspan (m) Flight speed (m/s) Avoidance rate (%) Whooper Swan Pink-footed goose Red Kite Hen Harrier Goshawk Osprey Kestrel Merlin Peregrine Golden Plover Lapwing Snipe Curlew Short-eared Owl

11 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Wind Farm and Turbine Parameters Wind farm and turbine parameters are detailed in Table 2-6 below. Data were provided by innogy following consultation with Vestas. Parameter Size of wind farm polygon (WP) Table 2-6: Wind Farm & Turbine Parameters Number of turbines 17 Rotor diameter Value 637ha 117m Hub height 91.5m Max. rotor depth Max. chord 1m 4m Pitch 0.0 Rotation period 4.29s Turbine operation time 85%

12 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd RESULTS 3.1 Flightline data Table 3-1 and Table 3-2 summarise the flightline data from all VPs presented for the breeding and non-breeding periods respectively. See ES Technical Appendices for further details. Table 3-1: Number of flights and individuals observed passing through the CRZ during breeding season VP surveys (2014 & 2015) Species name Total number of birds recorded in flight Flights through CRZ Flights Individuals Mallard No Goosander No Red Kite Yes Hen Harrier Yes Goshawk Yes Osprey Yes Kestrel Yes Merlin Yes Peregrine Yes Oystercatc her Ringed Plover Golden Plover No No Yes Lapwing Yes Snipe Yes Curlew Yes Redshank No Short-eared Owl Yes Collision modelling carried out?

13 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Table 3-2: Number of flights and individuals observed passing through the CRZ during non-breeding season VP surveys (2014/15 &2015/16) Species name Whooper Swan Pinkfooted Goose Greylag Goose Barnacle Goose Total number of birds recorded in flight Flights through collision risk zone at PCH Flights Individuals Yes 4, ,053 Yes No No Goosander No Red Kite Yes Hen Harrier Yes Goshawk Yes Osprey Yes Kestrel Yes Merlin Yes Peregrine Yes Golden Plover Yes Lapwing No Snipe Yes Curlew Yes Shorteared Owl Yes 3.2 Species Input Data Species input data are detailed in Tables 3.3 to Collision modelling carried out?

14 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd VP/ Viewshed VP ID Area of viewshed within WP Table 3.3: Whooper Swan Input Data Non-breeding season (including autumn & spring migratory surveys) Survey effort (hrs) Bird flight data Total VP/ Viewshed VP ID Area of viewshed within WP Risk height Non-breeding season = 1 September 31 March (212 or 213 days) Daylight average = hrs Table 3.4: Pink-footed Goose Input Data Non-breeding season (including autumn & spring migratory surveys) Survey effort (hrs) Bird flight data Total Risk height Non-breeding season = 1 September 31 March (212 or 213 days) Daylight average = hrs

15 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Table 3.5: Red Kite Input Data VP/ Viewshed Breeding season Non-breeding season Annual VP ID Area of viewshed within WP Survey effort (hrs) Bird flight data Total Risk height Survey effort (hrs) Bird flight data Total Risk height Survey effort (hrs) Bird flight data Total Breeding season = 1 March 31 July (153 days) Daylight average = hrs Non-breeding season = 1 August 28/29 February (212 or 213 days) Daylight average = 11.5 hrs Table 3.6: Hen Harrier Input Data Daylight average = hrs Risk height VP/ Viewshed Breeding season Non-breeding season Annual VP ID Area of viewshed within WP Survey effort (hrs) Bird flight data Total Risk height Survey effort (hrs) Bird flight data Total Risk height Survey effort (hrs) Bird flight data Total Breeding season = 15 March 15 August (153 days) Daylight average = hrs Non-breeding season = 16 August 14 March (212 or 213 days) Daylight average = hrs Daylight average = hrs Risk height

16 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Table 3.7: Goshawk Input Data VP/ Viewshed Breeding season Non-breeding season Annual VP ID Area of viewshed within WP Survey effort (hrs) Bird flight data Total Risk height Survey effort (hrs) Bird flight data Total Risk height Survey effort (hrs) Bird flight data Total Breeding season = 15 March 15 August (153 days) Daylight average = hrs Non-breeding season = 16 August 14 March (212 or 213 days) Daylight average = hrs Table 3.8: Osprey Input Data Daylight average = hrs Risk height VP/ Viewshed Breeding season Non-breeding season Annual VP ID Area of viewshed within WP Survey effort (hrs) Bird flight data Total Risk height Survey effort (hrs) Bird flight data Total Risk height Survey effort (hrs) Bird flight data Total Breeding season = 1 April 31 August (153 days) Daylight average = hrs Non-breeding season = 16 August 14 March (212 or 213 days) Daylight average = hrs Daylight average = hrs Risk height

17 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Table 3.9: Kestrel Input Data VP/ Viewshed Breeding season Non-breeding season Annual VP ID Area of viewshed within WP Survey effort (hrs) Bird flight data Total Risk height Survey effort (hrs) Bird flight data Total Risk height Survey effort (hrs) Bird flight data Total Breeding season = 1 March 15 August (168 days) Daylight average = 16.9 hrs Non-breeding season = 16 August 28/29 February (197 or 198 days) Daylight average = hrs Table 3.10: Merlin Input Data Daylight average = hrs Risk height VP/ Viewshed Breeding season Non-breeding season Annual VP ID Area of viewshed within WP Survey effort (hrs) Bird flight data Total Risk height Survey effort (hrs) Bird flight data Total Risk height Survey effort (hrs) Bird flight data Total Breeding season = 1 April 15 August (137 days) Daylight average = hrs Non-breeding season = 16 August 31 March (228 or 229 days) Daylight average = hrs Daylight average = hrs Risk height

18 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Table 3.11: Peregrine Input Data VP/ Viewshed Breeding season Non-breeding season Annual VP ID Area of viewshed within WP Survey effort (hrs) Bird flight data Total Risk height Survey effort (hrs) Bird flight data Total Risk height Survey effort (hrs) Bird flight data Total Breeding season = 1 March 15 August (168 days) Daylight average = 16.9 hrs Non-breeding season = 16 August 28/29 February (197 or 198 days) Daylight average = hrs Table 3.12: Golden Plover Input Data Daylight average = hrs Risk height VP/ Viewshed Breeding season Non-breeding season Annual VP ID Area of viewshed within WP Survey effort (hrs) Bird flight data Total Risk height Survey effort (hrs) Bird flight data Total Risk height Survey effort (hrs) Bird flight data Total Risk height Breeding season = 1 April 31 July (122 days) Daylight average = hrs Non-breeding season = 1 August 31 March (243 or 244 days) Daylight average = 11.7 hrs Daylight average = hrs

19 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd VP/ Viewshed VP ID Area of viewshed within WP Table 3.13: Lapwing Input Data Breeding season Survey effort (hrs) Bird flight data Total Breeding season = 1 March 31 July (153 days) Daylight average = hrs Table 3.14: Snipe Input Data Risk height VP/ Viewshed Breeding season Non-breeding season Annual VP ID Area of viewshed within WP Survey effort (hrs) Bird flight data Total Risk height Survey effort (hrs) Bird flight data Total Risk height Survey effort (hrs) Bird flight data Total Breeding season = 1 April 15 August (137 days) Daylight average = hrs Non-breeding season = 16 August 31 March (228 or 229 days) Daylight average = hrs Daylight average = hrs Risk height

20 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Table 3.15: Curlew Input Data VP/ Viewshed Breeding season Non-breeding season Annual VP ID Area of viewshed within WP Survey effort (hrs) Bird flight data Total Risk height Survey effort (hrs) Bird flight data Total Risk height Survey effort (hrs) Bird flight data Total Breeding season = 1 April 31 July (122 days) Daylight average = hrs Non-breeding season = 1 August 31 March (243 or 244 days) Daylight average = 11.7 hrs Table 3.16: Short-eared Owl Input Data Daylight average = hrs Risk height VP/ Viewshed Breeding season Non-breeding season Annual VP ID Area of viewshed within WP Survey effort (hrs) Bird flight data Total Risk height Survey effort (hrs) Bird flight data Total Risk height Survey effort (hrs) Bird flight data Total CRM Results Breeding season = 1 March 15 August (168 days) Daylight average = 16.9 hrs Non-breeding season = 16 August 28/29 February (197 or 198 days) Daylight average = hrs Daylight average = hrs Risk height The results of modelling are summarised in Table Copies of the modelling spreadsheets are provided in Annex 1.

21 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Species name Whooper swan Pink-footed goose Table 3-17: Summary of CRM Output Breeding season Non-breeding season Annual* Collisions per year Years per collision Collisions per year Years per collision Collisions per year Red Kite Hen Harrier Goshawk Osprey Kestrel Years per collision Merlin Peregrine Golden Plover Lapwing Snipe Curlew Short-eared Owl * (only for species present in both breeding and non-breeding seasons)

22 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd REFERENCES Band, W., Madders, M. & Whitfield, D.P. (2007). Developing field and analytical methods to assess avian collision risk at wind farms. In de Lucas, M, Janss, G. and Ferrer, M. (eds) "Birds and Wind Power". Lynx Edicions, Barcelona. Bruderer, B & Boldt, A. (2001). Flight characteristics of birds: I. radar measurements of speeds. Ibis 143, pp Provan, S. & Whitfield, D. P. (2006). Avian flight speeds and biometrics for use in collision risk modelling. Report to Scottish Natural Heritage from Natural Research (Projects) Ltd. SNH (2000). Windfarms and birds: calculating a theoretical collision risk assuming no avoidance action. SNH (2016). Avoidance Rates for the onshore SNH Wind Farm Collision Risk Model.

23 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd CLOSURE This report has been prepared by Consulting Limited with all reasonable skill, care and diligence, and taking account of the manpower and resources devoted to it by agreement with the client. Information reported herein is based on the interpretation of data collected and has been accepted in good faith as being accurate and valid. This report is for the exclusive use of Innogy Renewables UK Ltd; no warranties or guarantees are expressed or should be inferred by any third parties. This report may not be relied upon by other parties without written consent from. disclaims any responsibility to the client and others in respect of any matters outside the agreed scope of the work.

24 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Annex A Collision Mortality Calculations

25 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Whooper Swan K: [1D or [3D] (0 or 1) 1 Calculation of alpha and p(collision) as a function of radius NoBlades 3 Upwind: Downwind: MaxChord 4.00 m r/r c/c α collide contribution collide contribution Pitch (degrees) 0.0 radius chord alpha length p(collision) from radius r length p(collision) from radius r BirdLength 1.53 m Wingspan 2.31 m F: Flapping (0) or gliding (+1) Bird speed 17 m/sec RotorDiam 117 m RotationPeriod 4.29 sec Bird aspect Ratio: Overall p(collision) = Upwind 10.7% Downwind 10.7% Average 10.7%

26 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Whooper Swan Non-breeding Season FLIGHT ACTIVITY PER UNIT TIME & AREA VP Observation effort (HaHr) Flying time at 'risk E MORTALITY ESTIMATE Flight risk volume (Vw) m^3 Rotor radius m^2 Combined rotor swept volume (Vr) m^3 Vr * (d + l) m^3 Bird occupancy (n) 5.54 hrs / yr Bird occupancy of rotor swept vol (b) bird-secs Bird transit time (t) 0.15 secs No. of transits through rotors per year Estimated no. of collisions 7.70 per year After allowing for avoidance per year i.e. equivalent to one bird every 6.5 years Totals E-06 WEIGHTED BY OBSERVATION EFFORT VP Weighting Adjusted time at 'risk E Totals E-06 Mean activity hr^-1 in wind farm Risk height % Rotor height %

27 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Pink-footed Goose K: [1D or [3D] (0 or 1) 1 Calculation of alpha and p(collision) as a function of radius NoBlades 3 Upwind: Downwind: MaxChord 4.00 m r/r c/c α collide contribution collide contribution Pitch (degrees) 0.0 radius chord alpha length p(collision) from radius r length p(collision) from radius r BirdLength 0.68 m Wingspan m F: Flapping (0) or gliding (+1) Bird speed 15 m/sec RotorDiam 117 m RotationPeriod 4.29 sec Bird aspect Ratio: Overall p(collision) = Upwind 7.7% Downwind 7.7% Average 7.7%

28 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Pink-footed Goose Non-breeding Season FLIGHT ACTIVITY PER UNIT TIME & AREA VP Observation effort (HaHr) Flying time at 'risk E MORTALITY ESTIMATE Flight risk volume (Vw) m^3 Rotor radius m^2 Combined rotor swept volume (Vr) m^3 Vr * (d + l) m^3 Bird occupancy (n) hrs / yr Bird occupancy of rotor swept vol (b) bird-secs Bird transit time (t) 0.11 secs No. of transits through rotors per year Estimated no. of collisions per year After allowing for avoidance per year i.e. equivalent to one bird every 1.3 years Totals WEIGHTED BY OBSERVATION EFFORT VP Weighting Adjusted time at 'risk E E E E E E-05 Totals Mean activity hr^-1 in wind farm Risk height % Rotor height %

29 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Red Kite K: [1D or [3D] (0 or 1) 1 Calculation of alpha and p(collision) as a function of radius NoBlades 3 Upwind: Downwind: MaxChord 4.00 m r/r c/c α collide contribution collide contribution Pitch (degrees) 0.0 radius chord alpha length p(collision) from radius r length p(collision) from radius r BirdLength 0.63 m Wingspan 1.85 m F: Flapping (0) or gliding (+1) Bird speed 11 m/sec RotorDiam 117 m RotationPeriod 4.29 sec Bird aspect Ratio: Overall p(collision) = Upwind 8.7% Downwind 8.7% Average 8.7%

30 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Red Kite Breeding Season FLIGHT ACTIVITY PER UNIT TIME & AREA VP Observation effort (HaHr) Flying time at 'risk E MORTALITY ESTIMATE Flight risk volume (Vw) m^3 Rotor radius m^2 Combined rotor swept volume (Vr) m^3 Vr * (d + l) m^3 Bird occupancy (n) 4.71 hrs / yr Bird occupancy of rotor swept vol (b) 6.77 bird-secs Bird transit time (t) 0.16 secs No. of transits through rotors per year Estimated no. of collisions 3.24 per year After allowing for avoidance per year i.e. equivalent to one bird every 15.4 years Totals E-06 WEIGHTED BY OBSERVATION EFFORT VP Weighting Adjusted time at 'risk E Totals E-06 Mean activity hr^-1 in wind farm Risk height % Rotor height %

31 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Red Kite Non-breeding Season FLIGHT ACTIVITY PER UNIT TIME & AREA VP Observation effort (HaHr) Flying time at 'risk E E MORTALITY ESTIMATE Flight risk volume (Vw) m^3 Rotor radius m^2 Combined rotor swept volume (Vr) m^3 Vr * (d + l) m^3 Bird occupancy (n) 1.48 hrs / yr Bird occupancy of rotor swept vol (b) 2.14 bird-secs Bird transit time (t) 0.16 secs No. of transits through rotors per year Estimated no. of collisions 1.02 per year After allowing for avoidance per year i.e. equivalent to one bird every 49.0 years Totals E-07 WEIGHTED BY OBSERVATION EFFORT VP Weighting Adjusted time at 'risk E E Totals E-07 Mean activity hr^-1 in wind farm Risk height % Rotor height %

32 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Red Kite Annual FLIGHT ACTIVITY PER UNIT TIME & AREA VP Observation effort (HaHr) Flying time at 'risk E E E MORTALITY ESTIMATE Flight risk volume (Vw) m^3 Rotor radius m^2 Combined rotor swept volume (Vr) m^3 Vr * (d + l) m^3 Bird occupancy (n) 5.32 hrs / yr Bird occupancy of rotor swept vol (b) 7.66 bird-secs Bird transit time (t) 0.16 secs No. of transits through rotors per year Estimated no. of collisions 3.66 per year After allowing for avoidance per year i.e. equivalent to one bird every 13.6 years Totals E-07 WEIGHTED BY OBSERVATION EFFORT VP Weighting Adjusted time at 'risk E E E Totals E-06 Mean activity hr^-1 in wind farm Risk height % Rotor height %

33 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Hen Harrier K: [1D or [3D] (0 or 1) 1 Calculation of alpha and p(collision) as a function of radius NoBlades 3 Upwind: Downwind: MaxChord 4.00 m r/r c/c α collide contribution collide contribution Pitch (degrees) 0.0 radius chord alpha length p(collision) from radius r length p(collision) from radius r BirdLength 0.48 m Wingspan 1.1 m F: Flapping (0) or gliding (+1) Bird speed 12 m/sec RotorDiam 117 m RotationPeriod 4.29 sec Bird aspect ratioo: Overall p(collision) = Upwind 7.2% Downwind 7.2% Average 7.2%

34 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Hen Harrier Breeding FLIGHT ACTIVITY PER UNIT TIME & AREA VP Observation effort (HaHr) Flying time at 'risk E E E E E MORTALITY ESTIMATE Flight risk volume (Vw) m^3 Rotor radius m^2 Combined rotor swept volume (Vr) m^3 Vr * (d + l) m^3 Bird occupancy (n) hrs / yr Bird occupancy of rotor swept vol (b) bird-secs Bird transit time (t) 0.13 secs No. of transits through rotors per year Estimated no. of collisions per year After allowing for avoidance per year i.e. equivalent to one bird every 9.8 years Totals E-05 WEIGHTED BY OBSERVATION EFFORT VP Weighting Adjusted time at 'risk E E E E E Totals E-06 Mean activity hr^-1 in wind farm Risk height % Rotor height %

35 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Hen Harrier Non-breeding FLIGHT ACTIVITY PER UNIT TIME & AREA VP Observation effort (HaHr) Flying time at 'risk E E MORTALITY ESTIMATE Flight risk volume (Vw) m^3 Rotor radius m^2 Combined rotor swept volume (Vr) m^3 Vr * (d + l) m^3 Bird occupancy (n) 1.54 hrs / yr Bird occupancy of rotor swept vol (b) 2.01 bird-secs Bird transit time (t) 0.13 secs No. of transits through rotors per year Estimated no. of collisions 0.97 per year After allowing for avoidance per year i.e. equivalent to one bird every years Totals E-07 WEIGHTED BY OBSERVATION EFFORT VP Weighting Adjusted time at 'risk E E Totals E-07 Mean activity hr^-1 in wind farm Risk height % Rotor height %

36 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Hen Harrier Annual FLIGHT ACTIVITY PER UNIT TIME & AREA VP Observation effort (HaHr) Flying time at 'risk E E E E E MORTALITY ESTIMATE Flight risk volume (Vw) m^3 Rotor radius m^2 Combined rotor swept volume (Vr) m^3 Vr * (d + l) m^3 Bird occupancy (n) hrs / yr Bird occupancy of rotor swept vol (b) bird-secs Bird transit time (t) 0.13 secs No. of transits through rotors per year Estimated no. of collisions 9.52 per year After allowing for avoidance per year i.e. equivalent to one bird every 10.5 years Totals E-06 WEIGHTED BY OBSERVATION EFFORT VP Weighting Adjusted time at 'risk E E E E E Totals E-06 Mean activity hr^-1 in wind farm Risk height % Rotor height %

37 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Goshawk K: [1D or [3D] (0 or 1) 1 Calculation of alpha and p(collision) as a function of radius NoBlades 3 Upwind: Downwind: MaxChord 4.00 m r/r c/c α collide contribution collide contribution Pitch (degrees) 0.0 radius chord alpha length p(collision) from radius r length p(collision) from radius r BirdLength 0.55 m Wingspan 1.5 m F: Flapping (0) or gliding (+1) Bird speed 10 m/sec RotorDiam 117 m RotationPeriod 4.29 sec Bird aspect Ratio: Overall p(collision) = Upwind 8.3% Downwind 8.3% Average 8.3%

38 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Goshawk Breeding FLIGHT ACTIVITY PER UNIT TIME & AREA VP Observation effort (HaHr) Flying time at 'risk E E E E MORTALITY ESTIMATE Flight risk volume (Vw) m^3 Rotor radius m^2 Combined rotor swept volume (Vr) m^3 Vr * (d + l) m^3 Bird occupancy (n) 4.48 hrs / yr Bird occupancy of rotor swept vol (b) 6.13 bird-secs Bird transit time (t) 0.16 secs No. of transits through rotors per year Estimated no. of collisions 2.78 per year After allowing for avoidance per year i.e. equivalent to one bird every 18.0 years Totals E-06 WEIGHTED BY OBSERVATION EFFORT VP Weighting Adjusted time at 'risk E E E E Totals E-06 Mean activity hr^-1 in wind farm Risk height % Rotor height %

39 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Goshawk Non-breeding FLIGHT ACTIVITY PER UNIT TIME & AREA VP Observation effort (HaHr) Flying time at 'risk E E E E MORTALITY ESTIMATE Flight risk volume (Vw) m^3 Rotor radius m^2 Combined rotor swept volume (Vr) m^3 Vr * (d + l) m^3 Bird occupancy (n) 3.87 hrs / yr Bird occupancy of rotor swept vol (b) 5.30 bird-secs Bird transit time (t) 0.16 secs No. of transits through rotors per year Estimated no. of collisions 2.40 per year After allowing for avoidance per year i.e. equivalent to one bird every 20.8 years Totals E-06 WEIGHTED BY OBSERVATION EFFORT VP Weighting Adjusted time at 'risk E E E E Totals E-06 Mean activity hr^-1 in wind farm Risk height % Rotor height %

40 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Goshawk Annual FLIGHT ACTIVITY PER UNIT TIME & AREA VP Observation effort (HaHr) Flying time at 'risk E E E E E MORTALITY ESTIMATE Flight risk volume (Vw) m^3 Rotor radius m^2 Combined rotor swept volume (Vr) m^3 Vr * (d + l) m^3 Bird occupancy (n) 8.12 hrs / yr Bird occupancy of rotor swept vol (b) bird-secs Bird transit time (t) 0.16 secs No. of transits through rotors per year Estimated no. of collisions 5.04 per year After allowing for avoidance per year i.e. equivalent to one bird every 9.9 years Totals E-06 WEIGHTED BY OBSERVATION EFFORT VP Weighting Adjusted time at 'risk E E E E E Totals E-06 Mean activity hr^-1 in wind farm Risk height % Rotor height %

41 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Osprey K: [1D or [3D] (0 or 1) 1 Calculation of alpha and p(collision) as a function of radius NoBlades 3 Upwind: Downwind: MaxChord 4.00 m r/r c/c α collide contribution collide contribution Pitch (degrees) 0.0 radius chord alpha length p(collision) from radius r length p(collision) from radius r BirdLength 0.57 m Wingspan m F: Flapping (0) or gliding (+1) Bird speed 12 m/sec RotorDiam 117 m RotationPeriod 4.29 sec Bird aspect Ratio: Overall p(collision) = Upwind 7.8% Downwind 7.8% Average 7.8%

42 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Osprey Breeding FLIGHT ACTIVITY PER UNIT TIME & AREA VP Observation effort (HaHr) Flying time at 'risk E E MORTALITY ESTIMATE Flight risk volume (Vw) m^3 Rotor radius m^2 Combined rotor swept volume (Vr) m^3 Vr * (d + l) m^3 Bird occupancy (n) 2.11 hrs / yr Bird occupancy of rotor swept vol (b) 2.92 bird-secs Bird transit time (t) 0.13 secs No. of transits through rotors per year Estimated no. of collisions 1.49 per year After allowing for avoidance per year i.e. equivalent to one bird every 33.6 years Totals E-07 WEIGHTED BY OBSERVATION EFFORT VP Weighting Adjusted time at 'risk E E Totals E-06 Mean activity hr^-1 in wind farm Risk height % Rotor height %

43 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Osprey Non-breeding FLIGHT ACTIVITY PER UNIT TIME & AREA VP Observation effort (HaHr) Flying time at 'risk E MORTALITY ESTIMATE Flight risk volume (Vw) m^3 Rotor radius m^2 Combined rotor swept volume (Vr) m^3 Vr * (d + l) m^3 Bird occupancy (n) 0.42 hrs / yr Bird occupancy of rotor swept vol (b) 0.57 bird-secs Bird transit time (t) 0.13 secs No. of transits through rotors 4.41 per year Estimated no. of collisions 0.29 per year After allowing for avoidance per year i.e. equivalent to one bird every years Totals E-07 WEIGHTED BY OBSERVATION EFFORT VP Weighting Adjusted time at 'risk E Totals E-07 Mean activity hr^-1 in wind farm Risk height % Rotor height %

44 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Osprey Annual FLIGHT ACTIVITY PER UNIT TIME & AREA VP Observation effort (HaHr) Flying time at 'risk E E MORTALITY ESTIMATE Flight risk volume (Vw) m^3 Rotor radius m^2 Combined rotor swept volume (Vr) m^3 Vr * (d + l) m^3 Bird occupancy (n) 2.08 hrs / yr Bird occupancy of rotor swept vol (b) 2.87 bird-secs Bird transit time (t) 0.13 secs No. of transits through rotors per year Estimated no. of collisions 1.46 per year After allowing for avoidance per year i.e. equivalent to one bird every 34.2 years Totals E-07 WEIGHTED BY OBSERVATION EFFORT VP Weighting Adjusted time at 'risk E E Totals E-07 Mean activity hr^-1 in wind farm Risk height % Rotor height %

45 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Kestrel K: [1D or [3D] (0 or 1) 1 Calculation of alpha and p(collision) as a function of radius NoBlades 3 Upwind: Downwind: MaxChord 4.00 m r/r c/c α collide contribution collide contribution Pitch (degrees) 0.0 radius chord alpha length p(collision) from radius r length p(collision) from radius r BirdLength 0.34 m Wingspan m F: Flapping (0) or gliding (+1) Bird speed 13 m/sec RotorDiam 117 m RotationPeriod 4.29 sec Bird aspect Ratio: Overall p(collision) = Upwind 6.2% Downwind 6.2% Average 6.2%

46 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Kestrel Breeding FLIGHT ACTIVITY PER UNIT TIME & AREA VP Observation effort (HaHr) Flying time at 'risk E E E E E-06 MORTALITY ESTIMATE Flight risk volume (Vw) m^3 Rotor radius m^2 Combined rotor swept volume (Vr) m^3 Vr * (d + l) m^3 Bird occupancy (n) 8.68 hrs / yr Bird occupancy of rotor swept vol (b) 10.27bird-secs Bird transit time (t) 0.11 secs No. of transits through rotors per year Estimated no. of collisions 5.04 per year After allowing for avoidance per year i.e. equivalent to one bird every 4.0 years Totals E-06 WEIGHTED BY OBSERVATION EFFORT VP Weighting Adjusted time at 'risk E E E E E-07 Totals E-06 Mean activity hr^-1 in wind farm Risk height % Rotor height %

47 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Kestrel Non-breeding FLIGHT ACTIVITY PER UNIT TIME & AREA VP Observation effort (HaHr) E Flying time at 'risk E E E E-06 MORTALITY ESTIMATE Flight risk volume (Vw) m^3 Rotor radius m^2 Combined rotor swept volume (Vr) m^3 Vr * (d + l) m^3 Bird occupancy (n) 8.64 hrs / yr Bird occupancy of rotor swept vol (b) bird-secs Bird transit time (t) 0.11 secs No. of transits through rotors 95.37per year Estimated no. of collisions 5.02 per year After allowing for avoidance per year i.e. equivalent to one bird every 4.0 years Totals E-06 WEIGHTED BY OBSERVATION EFFORT VP Weighting Adjusted time at 'risk E E E E E-08 Totals E-06 Mean activity hr^-1 in wind farm Risk height % Rotor height %

48 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Kestrel Annual FLIGHT ACTIVITY PER UNIT TIME & AREA VP Observation effort (HaHr) Flying time at 'risk E E E E E-06 MORTALITY ESTIMATE Flight risk volume (Vw) m^3 Rotor radius m^2 Combined rotor swept volume (Vr) m^3 Vr * (d + l) m^3 Bird occupancy (n) 8.64 hrs / yr Bird occupancy of rotor swept vol (b) bird-secs Bird transit time (t) 0.11 secs No. of transits through rotors per year Estimated no. of collisions per year After allowing for avoidance per year i.e. equivalent to one bird every 2.0 years Totals E-06 WEIGHTED BY OBSERVATION EFFORT VP Weighting Adjusted time at 'risk E E E E E-07 Totals E-06 Mean activity hr^-1 in wind farm Risk height % Rotor height %

49 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Merlin K: [1D or [3D] (0 or 1) 1 Calculation of alpha and p(collision) as a function of radius NoBlades 3 Upwind: Downwind: MaxChord 4.00 m r/r c/c α collide contribution collide contribution Pitch (degrees) 0.0 radius chord alpha length p(collision) from radius r length p(collision) from radius r BirdLength 0.28 m Wingspan 0.56 m F: Flapping (0) or gliding (+1) Bird speed 13 m/sec RotorDiam 117 m RotationPeriod 4.29 sec Bird aspect Ratio: Overall p(collision) = Upwind 5.8% Downwind 5.8% Average 5.8%

50 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Merlin Breeding FLIGHT ACTIVITY PER UNIT TIME & AREA VP Observation effort (HaHr) Flying time at 'risk E MORTALITY ESTIMATE Flight risk volume (Vw) m^3 Rotor radius m^2 Combined rotor swept volume (Vr) m^3 Vr * (d + l) m^3 Bird occupancy (n) 0.10 hrs / yr Bird occupancy of rotor swept vol (b) 0.11 bird-secs Bird transit time (t) 0.10 secs No. of transits through rotors 1.08per year Estimated no. of collisions 0.05 per year After allowing for avoidance per year i.e. equivalent to one bird every years Totals E-08 WEIGHTED BY OBSERVATION EFFORT VP Weighting Adjusted time at 'risk E Totals E-08 Mean activity hr^-1 in wind farm Risk height % Rotor height %

51 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Merlin Non-breeding FLIGHT ACTIVITY PER UNIT TIME & AREA VP Observation effort (HaHr) Flying time at 'risk E MORTALITY ESTIMATE Flight risk volume (Vw) m^3 Rotor radius m^2 Combined rotor swept volume (Vr) m^3 Vr * (d + l) m^3 Bird occupancy (n) 0.12 hrs / yr Bird occupancy of rotor swept vol (b) 0.14 bird-secs Bird transit time (t) 0.10 secs No. of transits through rotors 1.37per year Estimated no. of collisions 0.07 per year After allowing for avoidance per year i.e. equivalent to one bird every years Totals E-08 WEIGHTED BY OBSERVATION EFFORT VP Weighting Adjusted time at 'risk E Totals E-08 Mean activity hr^-1 in wind farm Risk height % Rotor height %

52 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Merlin Annual FLIGHT ACTIVITY PER UNIT TIME & AREA VP Observation effort (HaHr) Flying time at 'risk E MORTALITY ESTIMATE Flight risk volume (Vw) m^3 Rotor radius m^2 Combined rotor swept volume (Vr) m^3 Vr * (d + l) m^3 Bird occupancy (n) 0.22 hrs / yr Bird occupancy of rotor swept vol (b) 0.25 bird-secs Bird transit time (t) 0.10 secs No. of transits through rotors 2.44per year Estimated no. of collisions 0.12 per year After allowing for avoidance per year i.e. equivalent to one bird every years Totals E-08 WEIGHTED BY OBSERVATION EFFORT VP Weighting Adjusted time at 'risk E Totals E-08 Mean activity hr^-1 in wind farm Risk height % Rotor height %

53 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Peregrine K: [1D or [3D] (0 or 1) 1 Calculation of alpha and p(collision) as a function of radius NoBlades 3 Upwind: Downwind: MaxChord 4.00 m r/r c/c α collide contribution collide contribution Pitch (degrees) 0.0 radius chord alpha length p(collision) from radius r length p(collision) from radius r BirdLength 0.45 m Wingspan 1.1 m F: Flapping (0) or gliding (+1) Bird speed 14 m/sec RotorDiam 117 m RotationPeriod 4.29 sec Bird aspect Ratio: Overall p(collision) = Upwind 6.7% Downwind 6.7% Average 6.7%

54 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Peregrine Breeding FLIGHT ACTIVITY PER UNIT TIME & AREA VP Observation effort (HaHr) Flying time at 'risk E E E MORTALITY ESTIMATE Flight risk volume (Vw) m^3 Rotor radius m^2 Combined rotor swept volume (Vr) m^3 Vr * (d + l) m^3 Bird occupancy (n) 2.56 hrs / yr Bird occupancy of rotor swept vol (b) 3.27 bird-secs Bird transit time (t) 0.10 secs No. of transits through rotors per year Estimated no. of collisions 1.79 per year After allowing for avoidance per year i.e. equivalent to one bird every 27.9 years Totals E-07 WEIGHTED BY OBSERVATION EFFORT VP Weighting Adjusted time at 'risk E E E Totals E-06 Mean activity hr^-1 in wind farm Risk height % Rotor height %

55 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Peregrine Non-breeding FLIGHT ACTIVITY PER UNIT TIME & AREA VP Observation effort (HaHr) Flying time at 'risk E E E E MORTALITY ESTIMATE Flight risk volume (Vw) m^3 Rotor radius m^2 Combined rotor swept volume (Vr) m^3 Vr * (d + l) m^3 Bird occupancy (n) 3.79 hrs / yr Bird occupancy of rotor swept vol (b) 4.85 bird-secs Bird transit time (t) 0.10 secs No. of transits through rotors per year Estimated no. of collisions 2.65 per year After allowing for avoidance per year i.e. equivalent to one bird every 18.9 years Totals E-06 WEIGHTED BY OBSERVATION EFFORT VP Weighting Adjusted time at 'risk E E E E Totals E-06 Mean activity hr^-1 in wind farm Risk height % Rotor height %

56 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Peregrine Annual FLIGHT ACTIVITY PER UNIT TIME & AREA VP Observation effort (HaHr) Flying time at 'risk E E E E MORTALITY ESTIMATE Flight risk volume (Vw) m^3 Rotor radius m^2 Combined rotor swept volume (Vr) m^3 Vr * (d + l) m^3 Bird occupancy (n) 6.68 hrs / yr Bird occupancy of rotor swept vol (b) 8.55 bird-secs Bird transit time (t) 0.10 secs No. of transits through rotors per year Estimated no. of collisions 4.68 per year After allowing for avoidance per year i.e. equivalent to one bird every 10.7 years Totals E-06 WEIGHTED BY OBSERVATION EFFORT VP Weighting Adjusted time at 'risk E E E E Totals E-06 Mean activity hr^-1 in wind farm Risk height % Rotor height %

57 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Golden plover K: [1D or [3D] (0 or 1) 1 Calculation of alpha and p(collision) as a function of radius NoBlades 3 Upwind: Downwind: MaxChord 4.00 m r/r c/c α collide contribution collide contribution Pitch (degrees) 0.0 radius chord alpha length p(collision) from radius r length p(collision) from radius r BirdLength 0.28 m Wingspan m F: Flapping (0) or gliding (+1) Bird speed 18 m/sec RotorDiam 117 m RotationPeriod 4.29 sec Bird aspect Ratio: Overall p(collision) = Upwind 5.5% Downwind 5.5% Average 5.5%

58 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Golden plover Breeding FLIGHT ACTIVITY PER UNIT TIME & AREA VP Observation effort (HaHr) E Flying time at 'risk E E MORTALITY ESTIMATE Flight risk volume (Vw) m^3 Rotor radius m^2 Combined rotor swept volume (Vr) m^3 Vr * (d + l) m^3 Bird occupancy (n) hrs / yr Bird occupancy of rotor swept vol (b) bird-secs Bird transit time (t) 0.07 secs No. of transits through rotors per year Estimated no. of collisions 34.75per year After allowing for avoidance per year i.e. equivalent to one bird every 1.4 years Totals E-05 WEIGHTED BY OBSERVATION EFFORT VP Weighting Adjusted time at 'risk E E E Totals E-05 Mean activity hr^-1 in wind farm Risk height % Rotor height %

59 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Golden plover Non-breeding FLIGHT ACTIVITY PER UNIT TIME & AREA VP Observation effort (HaHr) Flying time at 'risk E E E MORTALITY ESTIMATE Flight risk volume (Vw) m^3 Rotor radius m^2 Combined rotor swept volume (Vr) m^3 Vr * (d + l) m^3 Bird occupancy (n) 94.34hrs / yr Bird occupancy of rotor swept vol (b) bird-secs Bird transit time (t) 0.07 secs No. of transits through rotors per year Estimated no. of collisions 68.09per year After allowing for avoidance per year i.e. equivalent to one bird every 0.7 years Totals WEIGHTED BY OBSERVATION EFFORT VP Weighting Adjusted time at 'risk E E E E-05 Totals E-05 Mean activity hr^-1 in wind farm Risk height % Rotor height %

60 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Golden plover Annual FLIGHT ACTIVITY PER UNIT TIME & AREA VP Observation effort (HaHr) Flying time at 'risk E E E E MORTALITY ESTIMATE Flight risk volume (Vw) m^3 Rotor radius m^2 Combined rotor swept volume (Vr) m^3 Vr * (d + l) m^3 Bird occupancy (n) hrs / yr Bird occupancy of rotor swept vol (b) bird-secs Bird transit time (t) 0.07 secs No. of transits through rotors per year Estimated no. of collisions 90.24per year After allowing for avoidance per year i.e. equivalent to one bird every 0.6 years Totals WEIGHTED BY OBSERVATION EFFORT VP Weighting Adjusted time at 'risk E E E E E-05 Totals E-05 Mean activity hr^-1 in wind farm Risk height % Rotor height %

61 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Lapwing K: [1D or [3D] (0 or 1) 1 Calculation of alpha and p(collision) as a function of radius NoBlades 3 Upwind: Downwind: MaxChord 4.00 m r/r c/c α collide contribution collide contribution Pitch (degrees) 0.0 radius chord alpha length p(collision) from radius r length p(collision) from radius r BirdLength 0.30 m Wingspan m F: Flapping (0) or gliding (+1) Bird speed 12 m/sec RotorDiam 117 m RotationPeriod 4.29 sec Bird aspect Ratio: Overall p(collision) = Upwind 6.1% Downwind 6.1% Average 6.1%

62 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Lapwing Breeding FLIGHT ACTIVITY PER UNIT TIME & AREA VP Observation effort (HaHr) Flying time at 'risk E MORTALITY ESTIMATE Flight risk volume (Vw) m^3 Rotor radius m^2 Combined rotor swept volume (Vr) m^3 Vr * (d + l) m^3 Bird occupancy (n) 1.02 hrs / yr Bird occupancy of rotor swept vol (b) 1.18 bird-secs Bird transit time (t) 0.11 secs No. of transits through rotors per year Estimated no. of collisions 0.56 per year After allowing for avoidance per year i.e. equivalent to one bird every 88.9 years Totals E-07 WEIGHTED BY OBSERVATION EFFORT VP Weighting Adjusted time at 'risk E Totals E-07 Mean activity hr^-1 in wind farm Risk height % Rotor height %

63 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Snipe K: [1D or [3D] (0 or 1) 1 Calculation of alpha and p(collision) as a function of radius NoBlades 3 Upwind: Downwind: MaxChord 4.00 m r/r c/c α collide contribution collide contribution Pitch (degrees) 0.0 radius chord alpha length p(collision) from radius r length p(collision) from radius r BirdLength 0.26 m Wingspan m F: Flapping (0) or gliding (+1) Bird speed 16 m/sec RotorDiam 117 m RotationPeriod 4.29 sec Bird aspect Ratio: Overall p(collision) = Upwind 5.4% Downwind 5.4% Average 5.4%

64 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Snipe Breeding FLIGHT ACTIVITY PER UNIT TIME & AREA VP Observation effort (HaHr) Flying time at 'risk E MORTALITY ESTIMATE Flight risk volume (Vw) m^3 Rotor radius m^2 Combined rotor swept volume (Vr) m^3 Vr * (d + l) m^3 Bird occupancy (n) 0.26 hrs / yr Bird occupancy of rotor swept vol (b) 0.29 bird-secs Bird transit time (t) 0.08 secs No. of transits through rotors 3.66 per year Estimated no. of collisions 0.17 per year After allowing for avoidance per year i.e. equivalent to one bird every years Totals E-08 WEIGHTED BY OBSERVATION EFFORT VP Weighting Adjusted time at 'risk E Totals E-07 Mean activity hr^-1 in wind farm Risk height % Rotor height %

65 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Snipe Non-breeding FLIGHT ACTIVITY PER UNIT TIME & AREA VP Observation effort (HaHr) Flying time at 'risk E MORTALITY ESTIMATE Flight risk volume (Vw) m^3 Rotor radius m^2 Combined rotor swept volume (Vr) m^3 Vr * (d + l) m^3 Bird occupancy (n) 0.36 hrs / yr Bird occupancy of rotor swept vol (b) 0.40 bird-secs Bird transit time (t) 0.08 secs No. of transits through rotors 5.10 per year Estimated no. of collisions 0.23 per year After allowing for avoidance per year i.e. equivalent to one bird every years Totals E-07 WEIGHTED BY OBSERVATION EFFORT VP Weighting Adjusted time at 'risk E Totals E-07 Mean activity hr^-1 in wind farm Risk height % Rotor height %

66 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Snipe Annual FLIGHT ACTIVITY PER UNIT TIME & AREA VP Observation effort (HaHr) Flying time at 'risk E E MORTALITY ESTIMATE Flight risk volume (Vw) m^3 Rotor radius m^2 Combined rotor swept volume (Vr) m^3 Vr * (d + l) m^3 Bird occupancy (n) 0.62 hrs / yr Bird occupancy of rotor swept vol (b) 0.69 bird-secs Bird transit time (t) 0.08secs No. of transits through rotors 8.77 per year Estimated no. of collisions 0.40 per year After allowing for avoidance per year i.e. equivalent to one bird every years Totals E-08 WEIGHTED BY OBSERVATION EFFORT VP Weighting Adjusted time at 'risk E E Totals E-07 Mean activity hr^-1 in wind farm Risk height % Rotor height %

67 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Curlew K: [1D or [3D] (0 or 1) 1 Calculation of alpha and p(collision) as a function of radius NoBlades 3 Upwind: Downwind: MaxChord 4.00 m r/r c/c α collide contribution collide contribution Pitch (degrees) 0.0 radius chord alpha length p(collision) from radius r length p(collision) from radius r BirdLength 0.55 m Wingspan 0.9 m F: Flapping (0) or gliding (+1) Bird speed 13 m/sec RotorDiam 117 m RotationPeriod 4.29 sec Bird aspect Ratio: Overall p(collision) = Upwind 7.2% Downwind 7.2% Average 7.2%

68 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Curlew Breeding FLIGHT ACTIVITY PER UNIT TIME & AREA VP Observation effort (HaHr) Flying time at 'risk E E E E E E-06 MORTALITY ESTIMATE Flight risk volume (Vw) m^3 Rotor radius m^2 Combined rotor swept volume (Vr) m^3 Vr * (d + l) m^3 Bird occupancy (n) 7.19 hrs / yr Bird occupancy of rotor swept vol (b) 9.84 bird-secs Bird transit time (t) 0.12 secs No. of transits through rotors per year Estimated no. of collisions 5.06 per year After allowing for avoidance per year i.e. equivalent to one bird every 9.9 years Totals E-06 WEIGHTED BY OBSERVATION EFFORT VP Weighting Adjusted time at 'risk E E E E E E-07 Totals E-06 Mean activity hr^-1 in wind farm Risk height % Rotor height %

69 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Curlew Non-breeding FLIGHT ACTIVITY PER UNIT TIME & AREA VP Observation effort (HaHr) E-06 Flying time at 'risk E E MORTALITY ESTIMATE Flight risk volume (Vw) m^3 Rotor radius m^2 Combined rotor swept volume (Vr) m^3 Vr * (d + l) m^3 Bird occupancy (n) 0.72 hrs / yr Bird occupancy of rotor swept vol (b) 0.98 bird-secs Bird transit time (t) 0.12 secs No. of transits through rotors 8.21 per year Estimated no. of collisions 0.50 per year After allowing for avoidance per year i.e. equivalent to one bird every 99.3 years Totals E-07 WEIGHTED BY OBSERVATION EFFORT VP Weighting Adjusted time at 'risk E E E Totals E-07 Mean activity hr^-1 in wind farm Risk height % Rotor height %

70 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Curlew Annual FLIGHT ACTIVITY PER UNIT TIME & AREA VP Observation effort (HaHr) Flying time at 'risk E E E E E MORTALITY ESTIMATE Flight risk volume (Vw) m^3 Rotor radius m^2 Combined rotor swept volume (Vr) m^3 Vr * (d + l) m^3 Bird occupancy (n) 6.05 hrs / yr Bird occupancy of rotor swept vol (b) 8.27 bird-secs Bird transit time (t) 0.12 secs No. of transits through rotors per year Estimated no. of collisions 4.26 per year After allowing for avoidance per year i.e. equivalent to one bird every 11.7 years Totals E-06 WEIGHTED BY OBSERVATION EFFORT VP Weighting Adjusted time at 'risk E E E E E Totals E-06 Mean activity hr^-1 in wind farm Risk height % Rotor height %

71 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Short-eared owl K: [1D or [3D] (0 or 1) 1 Calculation of alpha and p(collision) as a function of radius NoBlades 3 Upwind: Downwind: MaxChord 4.00 m r/r c/c α collide contribution collide contribution Pitch (degrees) 0.0 radius chord alpha length p(collision) from radius r length p(collision) from radius r BirdLength 0.38 m Wingspan 1.02 m F: Flapping (0) or gliding (+1) Bird speed 9 m/sec RotorDiam 117 m RotationPeriod 4.29 sec Bird aspect Ratio: Overall p(collision) = Upwind 7.4% Downwind 7.4% Average 7.4%

72 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Short-eared owl Breeding FLIGHT ACTIVITY PER UNIT TIME & AREA VP Observation effort (HaHr) Flying time at 'risk E E MORTALITY ESTIMATE Flight risk volume (Vw) m^3 Rotor radius m^2 Combined rotor swept volume (Vr) m^3 Vr * (d + l) m^3 Bird occupancy (n) 3.65 hrs / yr Bird occupancy of rotor swept vol (b) 4.45 bird-secs Bird transit time (t) 0.16 secs No. of transits through rotors per year Estimated no. of collisions 1.73 per year After allowing for avoidance per year i.e. equivalent to one bird every 28.9 years Totals E-07 WEIGHTED BY OBSERVATION EFFORT VP Weighting Adjusted time at 'risk E E Totals E-06 Mean activity hr^-1 in wind farm Risk height % Rotor height %

73 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Short-eared owl Non-breeding FLIGHT ACTIVITY PER UNIT TIME VP Observation effort (HaHr) Flying time at 'risk E Totals E-09 MORTALITY ESTIMATE Flight risk volume (Vw) Rotor radius m^ m^2 Combined rotor swept volume(vr) m^3 Vr * (d + l) m^3 Bird occupancy (n) 0.01 hrs / yr Bird occupancy of rotor swept vol (b) 0.01 bird-secs Bird transit time (t) 0.16 secs No. of transits through rotors 0.06 per year Estimated no. of collisions 0.00 per year After allowing for avoidance per year i.e. equivalent to one bird every years WEIGHTED BY OBSERVATION EFFORT VP Weighting Adjusted time at 'risk E Totals E-09 Mean activity hr^-1 in wind farm Risk height % Rotor height %

74 Innogy Renewables UK Ltd Short-eared owl Annual FLIGHT ACTIVITY PER UNIT TIME & AREA VP Observation effort (HaHr) E E-07 Flying time at 'risk E MORTALITY ESTIMATE Flight risk volume (Vw) m^3 Rotor radius m^2 Combined rotor swept volume (Vr) m^3 Vr * (d + l) m^3 Bird occupancy (n) 2.82 hrs / yr Bird occupancy of rotor swept vol (b) 3.43 bird-secs Bird transit time (t) 0.16 secs No. of transits through rotors per year Estimated no. of collisions 1.33 per year After allowing for avoidance per year i.e. equivalent to one bird every 37.5 years Totals E-07 WEIGHTED BY OBSERVATION EFFORT VP Weighting Adjusted time at 'risk E E E Totals E-07 Mean activity hr^-1 in wind farm Risk height % Rotor height %

75 ABERDEEN 214 Union Street, Aberdeen AB10 1TL, UK T: +44 (0) AYLESBURY 7 Wornal Park, Menmarsh Road, Worminghall, Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire HP18 9PH, UK T: +44 (0) BELFAST Suite 1 Potters Quay, 5 Ravenhill Road, Belfast BT6 8DN, UK, Northern Ireland T: +44 (0) BRADFORD-ON-AVON Treenwood House, Rowden Lane, Bradford-on-Avon, Wiltshire BA15 2AU, UK T: +44 (0) BRISTOL Langford Lodge, 109 Pembroke Road, Clifton, Bristol BS8 3EU, UK T: +44 (0) CAMBRIDGE 8 Stow Court, Stow-cum-Quy, Cambridge CB25 9AS, UK T: + 44 (0) CARDIFF Fulmar House, Beignon Close, Ocean Way, Cardiff CF24 5PB, UK T: +44 (0) CHELMSFORD Unit 77, Waterhouse Business Centre, 2 Cromar Way, Chelmsford, Essex CM1 2QE, UK T: +44 (0) DUBLIN 7 Dundrum Business Park, Windy Arbour, Dundrum, Dublin 14 Ireland T: (0) EDINBURGH 4/5 Lochside View, Edinburgh Park, Edinburgh EH12 9DH, UK T: +44 (0) EXETER 69 Polsloe Road, Exeter EX1 2NF, UK T: + 44 (0) GLASGOW 4 Woodside Place, Charing Cross, Glasgow G3 7QF, UK T: +44 (0) GRENOBLE BuroClub, 157/155 Cours Berriat, Grenoble Cedex 1, France T: +33 (0) GUILDFORD 65 Woodbridge Road, Guildford Surrey GU1 4RD, UK T: +44 (0) LEEDS Suite 1, Jason House, Kerry Hill, Horsforth, Leeds LS18 4JR, UK T: +44 (0) LONDON 83 Victoria Street, London, SW1H 0HW, UK T: +44 (0) MAIDSTONE 19 Hollingworth Court, Turkey Mill, Maidstone, Kent ME14 5PP, UK T: +44 (0) MANCHESTER 8 th Floor, Quay West, MediaCityUK, Trafford Wharf Road, Manchester M17 1HH, UK T: +44 (0) NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE Sailors Bethel, Horatio Street, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE1 2PE, UK T: +44 (0) NOTTINGHAM Aspect House, Aspect Business Park, Bennerley Road, Nottingham NG6 8WR, UK T: +44 (0) SHEFFIELD Unit 2 Newton Business Centre, Thorncliffe Park Estate, Newton Chambers Road, Chapeltown, Sheffield S35 2PW, UK T: +44 (0) SHREWSBURY 2 nd Floor, Hermes House, Oxon Business Park, Shrewsbury SY3 5HJ, UK T: +44 (0) STAFFORD 8 Parker Court, Staffordshire Technology Park, Beaconside, Stafford ST18 0WP, UK T: +44 (0) STIRLING No. 68 Stirling Business Centre, Wellgreen, Stirling FK8 2DZ, UK T: +44 (0) WORCESTER Suite 5, Brindley Court, Gresley Road, Shire Business Park, Worcester WR4 9FD, UK T: +44 (0)

Site Name. Bird Dimensions Species Hen harrier = data input required length (m) 0.55 = model calculates value wing span (m) 1.

Site Name. Bird Dimensions Species Hen harrier = data input required length (m) 0.55 = model calculates value wing span (m) 1. Site Name Loch Urr Bird Dimensions Species Hen harrier = data input required length (m) 0.55 = model calculates value wing span (m) 1.4 speed (m/sec) 8 Turbine Dimensions Height of tower (m) 80 Blade length

More information

Appendix 7-6 Collision Risk Assessment. Proposed Ardderroo Wind Farm, Co. Galway

Appendix 7-6 Collision Risk Assessment. Proposed Ardderroo Wind Farm, Co. Galway Appendix 7-6 Collision Risk Assessment Proposed Ardderroo Wind Farm, Co. Galway DOCUMENT DETAILS Client: Project title: Ardderroo Wind Farm Ltd. Proposed Ardderroo Wind Farm, Co. Galway Project Number:

More information

Harryburn Wind Farm Wintering Bird Survey 2014/15

Harryburn Wind Farm Wintering Bird Survey 2014/15 Harryburn Wind Farm Wintering Bird Survey 2014/15 RWE INNOGY UK LTD V3 FINAL June 2015 Harryburn Wind Farm Wintering Bird Survey 2014/15 Project no: KU100500 Document title: Harryburn Wind Farm - Wintering

More information

Meenbog Wind Farm Development. Post-construction Bird Monitoring Programme

Meenbog Wind Farm Development. Post-construction Bird Monitoring Programme Meenbog Wind Farm Development Post-construction Bird Monitoring Programme DOCUMENT DETAILS Client: Project title: Planree Ltd. Meenbog Wind Farm, Co, Donegal Project Number: 160502 Document Title: Doc.

More information

Langholm - Newcastleton Hills SPA, SSSI. Castle Loch - Lochmaben SPA, Ramsar Castle Loch SSSI Castle And Hightae Lochs LNR.

Langholm - Newcastleton Hills SPA, SSSI. Castle Loch - Lochmaben SPA, Ramsar Castle Loch SSSI Castle And Hightae Lochs LNR. Contains Ordnance Survey data Crown copyright and database right 216 Scottish atural Heritage. Contains Ordnance Survey data Crown copyright and database right 216 Boundary 2 km Distance Band Special Protection

More information

Boa Vista Wind Farm Ponta do Sol

Boa Vista Wind Farm Ponta do Sol Boa Vista Wind Farm Ponta do Sol COLLISION RISK ASSESSMENT REPORT Supplementary Environmental Information Version 2 Final 5 December 2009 Boa Vista Wind Farm Ponta do Sol COLLISION RISK ASSESSMENT REPORT

More information

Impact of wind farms on birds and bats

Impact of wind farms on birds and bats Impact of wind farms on birds and bats Dr. Hermann Hötker Michael-Otto-Institut im NABU BirdLife Partner Germany Methods Disturbance and Displacement Collision mortality Repowering download: http://bergenhusen.nabu.de/bericht/voegelregenergien.pdf

More information

Guidance note: Distribution of breeding birds in relation to upland wind farms

Guidance note: Distribution of breeding birds in relation to upland wind farms Guidance note: Distribution of breeding birds in relation to upland wind farms December 2009 Summary Impacts of wind farms on bird populations can occur through collisions, habitat loss, avoidance/barrier

More information

PERMIT COMPLIANCE FILINGS. Date of Submission: January 17, 2012

PERMIT COMPLIANCE FILINGS. Date of Submission: January 17, 2012 PERMIT COMPLIANCE FILINGS Permittee: Permit Type: Project Location: AWA Goodhue, LLC LWECS Site Permit Goodhue County Commission Docket Number: IP-6701/WS-08-1233 Permit Section: Section 13.1.1 Type of

More information

Farr wind farm: A review of displacement disturbance on dunlin arising from operational turbines

Farr wind farm: A review of displacement disturbance on dunlin arising from operational turbines Farr wind farm: A review of displacement disturbance on dunlin arising from operational turbines 2002-2015. Alan H Fielding and Paul F Haworth September 2015 Haworth Conservation Haworth Conservation Ltd

More information

A large-scale, multispecies assessment of avian mortality rates at onshore wind turbines in northern Germany (PROGRESS) T.

A large-scale, multispecies assessment of avian mortality rates at onshore wind turbines in northern Germany (PROGRESS) T. A large-scale, multispecies assessment of avian mortality rates at onshore wind turbines in northern Germany (PROGRESS) T. Grünkorn Modules and aims of PROGRESS Module 1: Field work: - search of collision

More information

Assessing ornithological impacts associated with wind farm developments: surveying recommendations

Assessing ornithological impacts associated with wind farm developments: surveying recommendations Assessing ornithological impacts associated with wind farm developments: surveying recommendations This information note has been written to provide guidance to developers, Competent Authorities and others

More information

Krnovo Wind Farm. Bird Survey Report (November February 2016) March Akuo Energy

Krnovo Wind Farm. Bird Survey Report (November February 2016) March Akuo Energy Bird Survey Report November 2015 February 2016) March 2016 Akuo Energy 353617 EVT EMP 004 A Bird Survey Report Krnovo Wind Farm November 2015 February 2016) Bird Survey Report November 2015 February 2016)

More information

Wind farms and birds - the SSS Specificity

Wind farms and birds - the SSS Specificity Wind farms and birds - the SSS Specificity Experiences and recommendations for mitigation Marc Reichenbach 1 Possible impacts of wind turbines on birds have been discussed during the last 20 years Despite

More information

Short-eared Owl. Title Short-eared Owl

Short-eared Owl. Title Short-eared Owl Short-eared Owl Title Short-eared Owl 2006-2007 Description and Summary of Results Knowledge of the population size and trends of breeding Short-eared Owls Asio flammeus in Britain is poor and, although

More information

Goole Fields Wind Farm, East Yorkshire: Construction Phase Bird Surveys Report to RWE Innogy Ltd

Goole Fields Wind Farm, East Yorkshire: Construction Phase Bird Surveys Report to RWE Innogy Ltd Goole Fields Wind Farm, East Yorkshire: Report to RWE Innogy Ltd Steve Percival, Tracey Percival and Tom Lowe Ecology Consulting, Swallow Ridge Barn, Old Cassop, Durham DH6 4QB Email: steve.percival@ecologyconsult.co.uk

More information

6. Ornithology. Introduction. Scope of Assessment. Assessment Methodology. Planning. Baseline Characterisation. Study Area

6. Ornithology. Introduction. Scope of Assessment. Assessment Methodology. Planning. Baseline Characterisation. Study Area 6. Ornithology Introduction 6.1 This chapter describes and e valuates the current ornithological interest of the proposed wind farm at Aberarder (also referred to as the Proposal) and its surrounds, and

More information

INYANDA ROODEPLAAT WIND FARM, EASTERN CAPE, SOUTH AFRICA: BIRD SURVEYS UPDATE AUGUST 2015 JULY 2016

INYANDA ROODEPLAAT WIND FARM, EASTERN CAPE, SOUTH AFRICA: BIRD SURVEYS UPDATE AUGUST 2015 JULY 2016 INYANDA ROODEPLAAT WIND FARM, EASTERN CAPE, SOUTH AFRICA: BIRD SURVEYS UPDATE AUGUST 2015 JULY 2016 Report to Newcombe Wind Developments Black Harrier Steve Percival Steve Percival, Tracey Percival, Adri

More information

Bird Sensitivity Mapping for wind energy developments in Ireland Development & Implementation of the mapping tool. birdwatchireland.

Bird Sensitivity Mapping for wind energy developments in Ireland Development & Implementation of the mapping tool. birdwatchireland. Bird Sensitivity Mapping for wind energy developments in Ireland Development & Implementation of the mapping tool birdwatchireland.ie Guidance document Detailed guidance document Requirement for mapping

More information

Target Species. 3 This includes Scottish Government guidance on how government policies for the conservation and enhancement of Scotland s

Target Species. 3 This includes Scottish Government guidance on how government policies for the conservation and enhancement of Scotland s 9 Ornithology Introduction and Overview 9.1 This chapter describes and evaluates the current ornithological interest within the proposed site and surrounding area and assesses the predicted effects of

More information

Natural Heritage Zones Bird Population Estimates SWBSG Commissioned Report Number: 1504

Natural Heritage Zones Bird Population Estimates SWBSG Commissioned Report Number: 1504 Natural Heritage Zones Bird Population Estimates SWBSG Commissioned Report Number: 1504 i Natural Heritage Zones Bird Population Estimates Commissioned Report No.: SWBSG_1504 Project no: 1403 Contractor:

More information

Ecological Impacts of Wind Farms: Global Studies. Are Wind Farms Hazardous to Birds and Bats? Stephen J. Ambrose

Ecological Impacts of Wind Farms: Global Studies. Are Wind Farms Hazardous to Birds and Bats? Stephen J. Ambrose Ecological Impacts of Wind Farms: Global Studies Are Wind Farms Hazardous to Birds and Bats? Stephen J. Ambrose Impact Phases Construction Phase: Habitat clearance Disturbances (noise, visual, dust etc.)

More information

Linfairn Wind Farm Addendum Chapter A13: Shadow Flicker

Linfairn Wind Farm Addendum Chapter A13: Shadow Flicker A13. SHADOW FLICKER 13.1 Introduction The purpose of this chapter is to review amendments to the Project design and to advise of any consequent alterations to potential shadow flicker impacts as previously

More information

Farr wind farm: A review of displacement disturbance on golden plover arising from operational turbines

Farr wind farm: A review of displacement disturbance on golden plover arising from operational turbines Farr wind farm: A review of displacement disturbance on golden plover arising from operational turbines 2005-2015. Alan H Fielding and Paul F Haworth September 2015 Haworth Conservation Haworth Conservation

More information

ORJIP Bird avoidance behaviour and collision impact monitoring at offshore wind farms

ORJIP Bird avoidance behaviour and collision impact monitoring at offshore wind farms ORJIP Bird avoidance behaviour and collision impact monitoring at offshore wind farms Henrik Skov 1, Stefan Heinänen 1, Sara Méndez-Roldán 2, Tim Norman 2, Robin Ward 2 1 DHI, Agern Alle 5, 2970-DK, Hørsholm,

More information

vultures: : AMP case study

vultures: : AMP case study Effect of wind farms on vultures: : AMP case study Álvaro Camiña Biodiversity & Ecosystem Services in Impact Assessment IAIA Biodiversity & Ecology Section Inter-American Development Bank Washington, DC.

More information

Ornithological survey of a proposed wind farm site at Hill of Nigg

Ornithological survey of a proposed wind farm site at Hill of Nigg BTO Research Report No. 375 Ornithological survey of a proposed wind farm site at Hill of Nigg A report by the British Trust for Ornithology under contract to Shell WindEnergy Ltd. Authors Dan Chamberlain,

More information

RSPB CENTRE FOR CONSERVATION SCIENCE

RSPB CENTRE FOR CONSERVATION SCIENCE No.15 Renewable energy and conservation science RSPB CENTRE FOR CONSERVATION SCIENCE David J Slater (rspb-images.com) Where science comes to life RSPB CENTRE FOR CONSERVATION SCIENCE While the RSPB is

More information

Farr windfarm: A review of displacement disturbance on golden plover arising from operational turbines between

Farr windfarm: A review of displacement disturbance on golden plover arising from operational turbines between Farr windfarm: A review of displacement disturbance on golden plover arising from operational turbines between 2005-2009. Alan H Fielding and Paul F Haworth August 2010 Haworth Conservation Haworth Conservation

More information

GORDONBUSH WINDFARM ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT FURTHER INFORMATION (2) NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY SEPTEMBER Page 0

GORDONBUSH WINDFARM ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT FURTHER INFORMATION (2) NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY SEPTEMBER Page 0 GORDONBUSH WINDFARM ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT FURTHER INFORMATION (2) NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY SEPTEMBER 2006 Page 0 A. INTRODUCTION B. BIRDS In June 2003, Scottish and Southern Energy applied for consent under

More information

ASSESSING SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACTS FROM ONSHORE WINDFARMS ON BIRDS OUTWITH DESIGNATED AREAS July 2006

ASSESSING SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACTS FROM ONSHORE WINDFARMS ON BIRDS OUTWITH DESIGNATED AREAS July 2006 Guidance ASSESSING SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACTS FROM ONSHORE WINDFARMS ON BIRDS OUTWITH DESIGNATED AREAS July 2006 Paragraph 1 Scope and purpose 7 Introduction and background 11 Species priorities Table 1a

More information

Report to Inform an Appropriate Assessment for the Forth Islands and Imperial Dock Lock, Leith SPAs. Appendix B Survey Methods and Survey Effort

Report to Inform an Appropriate Assessment for the Forth Islands and Imperial Dock Lock, Leith SPAs. Appendix B Survey Methods and Survey Effort Report to Inform an Appropriate Assessment for the Forth Islands and Imperial Dock Lock, Leith SPAs Appendix B Methods and Effort November 2009 No part of this report may be copied or reproduced by any

More information

WindWise Education. 2 nd. T ransforming the Energy of Wind into Powerful Minds. editi. A Curriculum for Grades 6 12

WindWise Education. 2 nd. T ransforming the Energy of Wind into Powerful Minds. editi. A Curriculum for Grades 6 12 WindWise Education T ransforming the Energy of Wind into Powerful Minds A Curriculum for Grades 6 12 Notice Except for educational use by an individual teacher in a classroom setting this work may not

More information

Eagle Observation Surveys Arkwright Summit Wind Project Chautauqua County, New York

Eagle Observation Surveys Arkwright Summit Wind Project Chautauqua County, New York Eagle Observation Surveys Arkwright Summit Wind Project Chautauqua County, New York Final Report May August 2013 Prepared for: EDP Renewables 52 James Street 4 th Floor Albany, New York 12207 Prepared

More information

Meenbog Windfarm EIAR Co. Donegal. Birds Technical Appendix 7.1

Meenbog Windfarm EIAR Co. Donegal. Birds Technical Appendix 7.1 Meenbog Windfarm EIAR Co. Donegal Birds Technical Appendix 7.1 Appendix 7.1 Contents Table 1: Target Species... 3 Table 2: All Species Recorded... 4 2 Table 1: Target Species Species Latin Name Rationale

More information

ESPOO hearing. Danish Energy Agency TECHNICAL NOTE 2 NEARSHORE WIND FARMS: OMOE SOUTH AND JAM- MERLAND BAY

ESPOO hearing. Danish Energy Agency TECHNICAL NOTE 2 NEARSHORE WIND FARMS: OMOE SOUTH AND JAM- MERLAND BAY The Danish Energy Agency ESPOO hearing TECHNICAL NOTE 2 NEARSHORE WIND FARMS: OMOE SOUTH AND JAM- MERLAND BAY Client Consultant Danish Energy Agency Amaliegade 44 DK-1256 Copenhagen K Att.: Søren Keller

More information

Hawk Migration Studies by Southeastern Michigan Raptor Research at the Detroit River Mouth: A Basic Look

Hawk Migration Studies by Southeastern Michigan Raptor Research at the Detroit River Mouth: A Basic Look Hawk Migration Studies by Southeastern Michigan Raptor Research at the Detroit River Mouth: A Basic Look Paul Cypher Southeastern Michigan Raptor Research 1983: Started as a volunteerstaffed hawkwatch

More information

OTTER & BIRDS: IMPACT ASSESSMENT CONTENTS

OTTER & BIRDS: IMPACT ASSESSMENT CONTENTS THE HOY COMMUNITY WIND TURBINE OTTER & BIRDS OTTER & BIRDS: IMPACT ASSESSMENT CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 SCOPE OF REPORT. 1 1.2 SITE DESCRIPTION AND CONTEXT 1.2.1 Brief site description. 1 1.2.2 Nature

More information

Appendix 8.2 Information to be Read in Conjunction with Visualisations

Appendix 8.2 Information to be Read in Conjunction with Visualisations Shepherds Rig Wind Farm EIA Report Appendix 8.2 Information to be Read in Conjunction with Visualisations Contents Contents i Introduction 1 Viewpoint Photography 1 Stitching of Panoramas and Post-Photographic

More information

Work Plan for Pre-Construction Avian and Bat Surveys

Work Plan for Pre-Construction Avian and Bat Surveys Work Plan for Pre-Construction Avian and Bat Surveys, Steuben County, New York Prepared For: EverPower Wind Holdings, Inc. 1251 Waterfront Place, 3rd Floor Pittsburgh, PA 15222 Prepared By: Stantec Consulting

More information

ORJIP Bird Collision Avoidance Study. Sonja Pans (DHI Water Environments UK Ltd)

ORJIP Bird Collision Avoidance Study. Sonja Pans (DHI Water Environments UK Ltd) ORJIP Bird Collision Avoidance Study Sonja Pans (DHI Water Environments UK Ltd) 1 Consenting risk is a major issue for offshore wind The challenge Before a wind farm can be built, developers must be awarded

More information

A briefing document on best practice for preconstruction assessment of the impacts of onshore wind farms on birds.

A briefing document on best practice for preconstruction assessment of the impacts of onshore wind farms on birds. A briefing document on best practice for preconstruction assessment of the impacts of onshore wind farms on birds. Mike Jordan & Jon Smallie mikej@ewt.org.za & jons@ewt.org.za The Endangered Wildlife Trust

More information

Thanet Offshore Wind Farm Ornithological Monitoring

Thanet Offshore Wind Farm Ornithological Monitoring HASKONING UK LTD. ENVIRONMENT Thanet Offshore Wind Farm Ornithological Monitoring 2012-2013 Thanet Offshore Wind Limited July 2013 Final Report XXXX A COMPANY OF HASKONING UK LTD. ENVIRONMENT Rightwell

More information

An Ecological Risk Assessment of Wind Energy Development in Montana

An Ecological Risk Assessment of Wind Energy Development in Montana An Ecological Risk Assessment of Wind Energy Development in Montana Brian Martin, Amy Pearson, Brad Bauer The Nature Conservancy Barbara Cozzens Altitude of Nocturnal Migrants (m above ground level) 25

More information

Calendar view of Please see below the various birdwatching, wildlife & photography group tours we are offering throughout 2014.

Calendar view of Please see below the various birdwatching, wildlife & photography group tours we are offering throughout 2014. Calendar view of 2014 Please see below the various birdwatching, wildlife & photography group s we are offering throughout 2014. The group s shown on the calendar breakdown into, Scotland, Spain & India

More information

Bird Assessment as part of an Environmental Statement for the proposed Silverbirch Wind Farm, Co. Kerry

Bird Assessment as part of an Environmental Statement for the proposed Silverbirch Wind Farm, Co. Kerry Bird Assessment as part of an Environmental Statement for the proposed Silverbirch Wind Farm, Co. Kerry Long Strand, Castlefreke, Clonakilty, County Cork Telephone 00 353 2388 40665 or 00 353 87 904 2383

More information

PEAK DISTRICT BIRD OF PREY INITIATIVE REPORT

PEAK DISTRICT BIRD OF PREY INITIATIVE REPORT Project Overview PEAK DISTRICT BIRD OF PREY INITIATIVE - 2018 REPORT Five leading land management and conservation organisations in the Peak District National Park got together in 2011 to develop an initiative,

More information

Greenlaw Mountain Hawk Watch Fall 2014

Greenlaw Mountain Hawk Watch Fall 2014 Greenlaw Mountain Hawk Watch Fall 2014 Another season has come to an end. Much was learned, volunteer participation remained strong and several rarities were recorded including two new raptor species.

More information

HABITATS REGULATIONS ASSESSMENT St. Anne s on the Sea Neighbourhood Plan Addendum to Screening Opinion OCTOBER 2016

HABITATS REGULATIONS ASSESSMENT St. Anne s on the Sea Neighbourhood Plan Addendum to Screening Opinion OCTOBER 2016 HABITATS REGULATIONS ASSESSMENT St. Anne s on the Sea Neighbourhood Plan Addendum to Screening Opinion OCTOBER 2016 CONTACTS JO WEAVER Senior Ecologist dd +44 (0)1453 423124 m +44 (0)7809 549186 e jo.weaver@arcadis.com

More information

INYANDA ROODEPLAAT WIND FARM, EASTERN CAPE, SOUTH AFRICA: BIRD SURVEYS AUGUST 2015 JANUARY 2016

INYANDA ROODEPLAAT WIND FARM, EASTERN CAPE, SOUTH AFRICA: BIRD SURVEYS AUGUST 2015 JANUARY 2016 INYANDA ROODEPLAAT WIND FARM, EASTERN CAPE, SOUTH AFRICA: BIRD SURVEYS AUGUST 2015 JANUARY 2016 Report to Newcombe Wind Developments Black Harrier Steve Percival Steve Percival, Tracey Percival, Adri Barkhuysen,

More information

Key recent science for UK raptor conservation

Key recent science for UK raptor conservation Key recent science for UK raptor conservation Staffan Roos 1 & Jeremy Wilson 1, 2 1 Centre for Conservation Science, RSPB Scotland 2 School of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Stirling

More information

Uptake of BirdLife South Africa/ EWT Best Practice Guidelines for Bird and Wind Energy

Uptake of BirdLife South Africa/ EWT Best Practice Guidelines for Bird and Wind Energy Uptake of BirdLife South Africa/ EWT Best Practice Guidelines for Bird and Wind Energy By Samantha Ralston, BirdLife South Africa (energy@birdlife.org.za) Working towards global acceptance and application

More information

Memorandum. Introduction

Memorandum. Introduction Memorandum To: Mark Slaughter, Bureau of Land Management From: Eric Koster, SWCA Environmental Consultants Date: December 6, 2016 Re: Proposed Golden Eagle Survey Protocol for Searchlight Wind Energy Project

More information

Supplementary Report to Additional Assessment Final Report

Supplementary Report to Additional Assessment Final Report DRAFT FINAL REPORT Crucea North Wind Farm Constanta County, Romania Bucharest 145 Calea Victoriei Blvd., Victoria Center, 8 th Floor, Sector 1, 010072 Romania T: +40 (0) 31 405 1680 F: +40 (0) 31 405 1681

More information

Mitigating potential impacts to Brolga at proposed Victorian Wind Energy Facilities. Mark Venosta, Biosis NZWEA 2014

Mitigating potential impacts to Brolga at proposed Victorian Wind Energy Facilities. Mark Venosta, Biosis NZWEA 2014 Mitigating potential impacts to Brolga at proposed Victorian Wind Energy Facilities Mark Venosta, Biosis NZWEA 2014 Presentation overview: Why assess Brolga impacts? Prone to collision with power lines

More information

Best Practice Avifaunal Monitoring/Impact Assessment: The way forward in South Africa. Hanneline Smit

Best Practice Avifaunal Monitoring/Impact Assessment: The way forward in South Africa. Hanneline Smit Best Practice Avifaunal Monitoring/Impact Assessment: The way forward in South Africa Hanneline Smit conservation@birdlife.org.za Red Data species (125/844) = 15%! 1. Mortality = Collision with wind turbines

More information

Appendix 9.A Winter Vantage Point Survey Report

Appendix 9.A Winter Vantage Point Survey Report Appendix 9.A Winter Vantage Point Survey Report Entec UK Limited Entec UK Limited Kelmarsh Windfarm Winter Bird Survey April 2008 Client Job Name Report title File reference E.ON Renewables Ltd Kelmarsh

More information

WESTERMOST ROUGH OFFSHORE WIND FARM: ORNITHOLOGICAL SURVEY ANNUAL REPORT, SEPTEMBER 2012 OCTOBER 2013

WESTERMOST ROUGH OFFSHORE WIND FARM: ORNITHOLOGICAL SURVEY ANNUAL REPORT, SEPTEMBER 2012 OCTOBER 2013 WESTERMOST ROUGH OFFSHORE WIND FARM: ORNITHOLOGICAL SURVEY ANNUAL REPORT, SEPTEMBER 2012 OCTOBER 2013 Jon Ford (Gannet), Steve Percival (Puffin and Little gull) Dr Steve Percival and Jon Ford On behalf

More information

The Big Farmland Bird Count Information Sheet

The Big Farmland Bird Count Information Sheet The Big Farmland Bird Count Information Sheet 1 The aim of the Big Farmland Bird Count is to help raise awareness of the important role that farmers play in the survival of farmland bird populations. It

More information

Ecological Designations Figure 5. Shepherds' Rig Wind Farm Scoping Report. Site Boundary. 2 km Study Area. 5 km Study Area.

Ecological Designations Figure 5. Shepherds' Rig Wind Farm Scoping Report. Site Boundary. 2 km Study Area. 5 km Study Area. 240000 250000 270000 280000 290000 Muirkirk and North Lowther Uplands 610000 600000 600000 620000 620000 Site Boundary 610000 2 km Study Area 5 km Study Area 20 km Study Area Ancient Woodland Inventory

More information

NATIONAL PARK AUTHORITY REPORT ON PEAK DISTRICT BIRD OF PREY INITIATIVE

NATIONAL PARK AUTHORITY REPORT ON PEAK DISTRICT BIRD OF PREY INITIATIVE NATIONAL PARK AUTHORITY REPORT ON PEAK DISTRICT BIRD OF PREY INITIATIVE 2012-2015 Background In 2011, following concerns about declining populations of several birds of prey, reported instances of known

More information

APPENDIX 11.2 BRENT GEESE SURVEY REPORT

APPENDIX 11.2 BRENT GEESE SURVEY REPORT APPENDIX 11.2 BRENT GEESE SURVEY REPORT Light-bellied Brent Goose presence on Alfie Byrne Road Green Space and Belcamp Park in Dublin City along route corridor for proposed aviation fuel pipeline SUMMARY

More information

Vultures, Bats and Wind farms

Vultures, Bats and Wind farms Vultures, Bats and Wind farms WIND ENERGY : COLLISIONS - Eurasian Griffon vulture - Bearded vulture - Cinereous (Black) vulture - Egyptian vulture - Rüppell s Griffon Vulture - White-Backed Vulture WIND

More information

Appendix 9.A Vantage point survey report

Appendix 9.A Vantage point survey report Appendix 9.A Vantage point survey report l:\data\projects\ea-210\24421 winwick wind farm (sub file)\24421 winwick es final.doc Entec UK Limited May 2010 l:\data\projects\ea-210\24421 winwick wind farm

More information

A self working system to reduce Bird mortality in wind farms

A self working system to reduce Bird mortality in wind farms A self working system to reduce Bird mortality in wind farms DTBird is a self working system developed to detect flying birds, that is able to perform realtime actions linked to bird detection. Bird detection

More information

EF Retief Presenter. Co-Authors MD Anderson; D Harebottle; A Jenkins; R Simmons; HA Smit; C Van Rooyen; J Smallie

EF Retief Presenter. Co-Authors MD Anderson; D Harebottle; A Jenkins; R Simmons; HA Smit; C Van Rooyen; J Smallie EF Retief Presenter Co-Authors MD Anderson; D Harebottle; A Jenkins; R Simmons; HA Smit; C Van Rooyen; J Smallie The Wind Farm Industry in South Africa New programme in South Africa Only 8 wind turbines

More information

Draft Environmental Statement Volume 3 Appendices Part 3 of 11

Draft Environmental Statement Volume 3 Appendices Part 3 of 11 Draft Environmental Statement Volume 3 Appendices Part 3 of 11 Brechfa Forest Connection Project November 2014 Contents Appendix 3.1 Appendix 3.2 Appendix 6.1 Appendix 7.1 Appendix 9.1 Appendix 9.2 Appendix

More information

Memorandum. To: Heritage Wind, LLC. From: Justin Zoladz. Date: October 30, Re: 2017 Spring Migratory Raptor Survey Results

Memorandum. To: Heritage Wind, LLC. From: Justin Zoladz. Date: October 30, Re: 2017 Spring Migratory Raptor Survey Results To: From: Justin Zoladz Date: Re: 2017 Spring Migratory Raptor Survey Results 1 Project Description (Heritage) is developing the Heritage Wind Project (Project) in the town of Barre, Orleans County, New

More information

United States Department of the Interior

United States Department of the Interior United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE New England Field Office 70 Commercial Street, Suite 300 Concord, Nil 03301-5087 http://www.fws. gov/newengland Environmental Division

More information

HELCOM workshop on migratory waterbirds

HELCOM workshop on migratory waterbirds HELCOM workshop on migratory waterbirds Helsinki, 20-22 November 2018 Aims: Produce maps with migration routes of waterbird species (e.g. seabirds, ducks, waders) covering the entire Baltic Sea Region.

More information

ORNITHOLOGY CHAPTER 1 11 ORNITHOLOGY 11-4

ORNITHOLOGY CHAPTER 1 11 ORNITHOLOGY 11-4 Ornithology chapter Table of Contents ORNITHOLOGY CHAPTER 1 11 ORNITHOLOGY 11-4 11.1 Introduction 11-4 11.2 Legislative framework and policy context 11-5 11.3 Scoping and consultation 11-6 11.4 Baseline

More information

Prepared For: Prepared by:

Prepared For: Prepared by: WOLFE ISLAND WIND PLANT POST-CONSTRUCTION FOLLOW- UP PLAN BIRD AND BAT RESOURCES MONITORING REPORT NO. 5 JANUARY - JUNE 2011 File No. 160960494 Prepared For: TransAlta Corporation s wholly owned subsidiary

More information

General report format, ref. Article 12 of the Birds Directive, for the report

General report format, ref. Article 12 of the Birds Directive, for the report Annex 1: General report format, ref. Article 12 of the Birds Directive, for the 2008-2012 report 0. Member State Select the 2 digit code for your country, according to list to be found in the reference

More information

Chokecherry and Sierra Madre Wind Energy Project

Chokecherry and Sierra Madre Wind Energy Project Chokecherry and Sierra Madre Wind Energy Project Intensive Avian Protection Planning Avian Protection Summary In 2010, PCW initiated a collaborative process with BLM, USFWS, and Wyoming Game and Fish Department

More information

The 2014 Peregrine Survey

The 2014 Peregrine Survey The 2014 Peregrine Survey Guidelines for Contributors This is the Sixth survey of breeding Peregrines across the UK. The main aim is to establish how many territories are occupied in 2014 for comparison

More information

CARSINGTON MONTHLY REPORT JANUARY 2003

CARSINGTON MONTHLY REPORT JANUARY 2003 CARSINGTON MONTHLY REPORT JANUARY 2003 January highlights were Great Northern Diver, Bewick s Swan, Mandarin, Red-crested Pochard, Greater Scaup, Water Rail, Mediterranean Gull and Stonchat. The Great

More information

Raptors at a Glance. Small birds, some mammals

Raptors at a Glance. Small birds, some mammals Accipiters Common Name Sharp-shinned Hawk Cooper's Hawk Northern Goshawk Scientific Name Accipiter striatus Accipiter cooperii Accipiter gentilis Woodlands Woods, adapts well to urban areas; MF build Woodlands,

More information

The Big Farmland Bird Count Information Sheet

The Big Farmland Bird Count Information Sheet The aim of the Big Farmland Bird Count is to help raise awareness of the important role that farmers play in the survival of farmland bird populations. It will provide an opportunity for farmers to actually

More information

DTBird System Specifications for Wind Turbines

DTBird System Specifications for Wind Turbines DTBird System Specifications for Wind Turbines Day & Night On & Offshore DTBIRD TEAM November 2017. Ref.: DTB0516SPWTG.Rev2 Fulfilled: Marcos Puente 13/11/17 Reviewed: Javier Díaz 14/11/17 Approved: Agustín

More information

POST-CONSTRUCTION WILDLIFE MONITORING AT THE ATLANTIC CITY UTILITIES AUTHORITY- JERSEY ATLANTIC WIND POWER FACILITY

POST-CONSTRUCTION WILDLIFE MONITORING AT THE ATLANTIC CITY UTILITIES AUTHORITY- JERSEY ATLANTIC WIND POWER FACILITY POST-CONSTRUCTION WILDLIFE MONITORING AT THE ATLANTIC CITY UTILITIES AUTHORITY- JERSEY ATLANTIC WIND POWER FACILITY PROJECT STATUS REPORT IV Submitted to: New Jersey Board of Public Utilities New Jersey

More information

LOCH LEVEN NATIONAL NATURE RESERVE (NNR) Proposed Local Access Guidance

LOCH LEVEN NATIONAL NATURE RESERVE (NNR) Proposed Local Access Guidance LOCH LEVEN NATIONAL NATURE RESERVE (NNR) Proposed Local Access Guidance Summary This paper briefly outlines the rationale behind the proposed local access guidance for Loch Leven NNR. Introduction SNH

More information

Windfarm development and bird conservation

Windfarm development and bird conservation Windfarm development and bird conservation Álvaro Camina Podgorica, Montenegro, 17 December 2010 Montenegro and the Balkan region Protected areas/species in Montenegro List of protected species Fam Name

More information

APPENDIX A ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT CONDITION REQUIREMENTS CONDITION 4.0

APPENDIX A ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT CONDITION REQUIREMENTS CONDITION 4.0 APPENDIX A ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT CONDITION REQUIREMENTS CONDITION 4.0 Condition 4: Migratory Birds 4.1.1 The Proponent shall carry out all phases of the Designated Project in a manner that avoids harming

More information

Seagreen Wind Energy Limited C/o SSE Renewables 1 Waterloo Street Glasgow G2 6AY

Seagreen Wind Energy Limited C/o SSE Renewables 1 Waterloo Street Glasgow G2 6AY Date: 30 th March 2018 Ref: A4MR-SEAG-Z-LGL810-SLE-548 Dr. Nicola Bain Marine Renewables Section Leader Licensing Operations Team Marine Scotland Marine Laboratory 375 Victoria Road Aberdeen AB11 9DB Seagreen

More information

THE MERSEY GATEWAY PROJECT (MERSEY GATEWAY BRIDGE) AVIAN ECOLOGY SUMMARY PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF. Paul Oldfield

THE MERSEY GATEWAY PROJECT (MERSEY GATEWAY BRIDGE) AVIAN ECOLOGY SUMMARY PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF. Paul Oldfield HBC/14/3S THE MERSEY GATEWAY PROJECT (MERSEY GATEWAY BRIDGE) AVIAN ECOLOGY SUMMARY PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF Paul Oldfield 1 1 DESCRIPTION OF THE BIRDLIFE IN THE UPPER MERSEY ESTUARY LOCAL WILDLIFE SITE 1.1

More information

Technical Appendix 5.2: Further Information Ornithology (T39 Layout)

Technical Appendix 5.2: Further Information Ornithology (T39 Layout) SS Renewables Further Information Report, 2014 Strathy South Technical Appendix 5.2: Further Information Ornithology (T39 Layout) RPS UK12-17181 Issue: 4 NVIRON TCHNICAL APPNDIX 5.2: STRATHY SOUTH WIND

More information

Dispersed Waterbirds Survey

Dispersed Waterbirds Survey Dispersed Waterbirds Survey Title Dispersed Waterbird Survey 2002/03 Description and Summary of Results The main wetland sites are counted by the Wetland Bird Survey (WeBS) Core Counts -- monthly counts

More information

Bird Monitoring & Reduction of Collision Risk with Wind Turbines DTBIRD SYSTEM

Bird Monitoring & Reduction of Collision Risk with Wind Turbines DTBIRD SYSTEM Bird Monitoring & Reduction of Collision Risk with Wind Turbines DTBIRD SYSTEM SEPTEMBER 2017 Introduction Bird Monitoring & Reduction of Collision Risk with Wind Turbines DTBird is a self-working system

More information

ORNITHOLOGICAL ITINERARIES Naturum Tåkern Lake Tåkern Nature Reserve/ 1 ORNITHOLOGICAL ITINERARIES. Lake Tåkern

ORNITHOLOGICAL ITINERARIES Naturum Tåkern Lake Tåkern Nature Reserve/ 1 ORNITHOLOGICAL ITINERARIES. Lake Tåkern Lake Tåkern Nature Reserve/ 1 ORNITHOLOGICAL ITINERARIES IN Lake Tåkern Lake Tåkern Nature Reserve/ 2 1.- Reeds and shallow waters at Glänås The modern tower offers the best view of the lake and is a good

More information

Kingston Field Naturalists

Kingston Field Naturalists Kingston Field Naturalists P.O. Box 831 Kingston, Ontario K7L 4X6 http://www.kingstonfieldnaturalists.org March 5, 2013 Mr. Sean Fairfield Manager, Environmental Planning Algonquin Power Co. 2845 Bristol

More information

CDOW Recommended Stipulations for Oil and Gas Within the State of Colorado

CDOW Recommended Stipulations for Oil and Gas Within the State of Colorado CDOW Recommended Stipulations for Oil and Gas Within the State of Colorado No Surface Occupancy Timing Limitation Controlled Surface Use Stipulation Stipulation Stipulation Wildlife Habitat Species Types

More information

Bird Monitoring & Reduction of Collision Risk with Wind Turbines DTBIRD SYSTEM

Bird Monitoring & Reduction of Collision Risk with Wind Turbines DTBIRD SYSTEM Bird Monitoring & Reduction of Collision Risk with Wind Turbines DTBIRD SYSTEM MAY 2017 Introduction Bird Monitoring & Reduction of Collision Risk with Wind Turbines DTBird is a self-working system that

More information

Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project (FERC No ) Waterbird Migration, Breeding, and Habitat Use Study Plan Section 10.15

Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project (FERC No ) Waterbird Migration, Breeding, and Habitat Use Study Plan Section 10.15 (FERC No. 14241) Waterbird Migration, Breeding, and Habitat Use Study Plan Section 10.15 Initial Study Report Part C: Executive Summary and Section 7 Prepared for Prepared by ABR, Inc. Environmental Research

More information

W-S3: EAGLE AND RAPTOR NEST STUDY - DRAFT

W-S3: EAGLE AND RAPTOR NEST STUDY - DRAFT W-S3: EAGLE AND RAPTOR NEST STUDY - DRAFT INTRODUCTION The (AEA) is preparing a License Application that will be submitted to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) for the Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric

More information

Changes in upland bird numbers and distribution in the Berwyn Special Protection Area, North Wales between 1983 and 2012

Changes in upland bird numbers and distribution in the Berwyn Special Protection Area, North Wales between 1983 and 2012 GAME & WILDLIFE CONSERVATION TRUST Changes in upland bird numbers and distribution in the Berwyn Special Protection Area, North Wales between 1983 and 2012 Philip Warren & David Baines June 2012 (revised

More information

VESTERHAV SYD OFFSHORE WIND FARM

VESTERHAV SYD OFFSHORE WIND FARM Energinet.dk April 2015 VESTERHAV SYD OFFSHORE WIND FARM EIA background report FINAL Project Vesterhav Syd Offshore Wind Farm EIA - background report Energinet.dk Frontpage photo: Eurasian Wigeon (Stefan

More information

Avinor Activities since last meeting, results from Risk analysis bird and wildlife control

Avinor Activities since last meeting, results from Risk analysis bird and wildlife control Avinor Activities since last meeting, results from Risk analysis bird and wildlife control D. Paton s model «Bird Risk Assessment Model for Airports and Aerodromes» (2010) used with some adaptions This

More information

Scottish Raptor Monitoring Scheme Report 2014

Scottish Raptor Monitoring Scheme Report 2014 Scottish Raptor Monitoring Scheme Report 2014 Amy Challis, Mark Wilson, Mark Holling, Staffan Roos, Andrew Stevenson & Patrick Stirling-Aird October 2015 Contents Contents... ii Foreword... iii 1 Introduction...

More information

Bald Eagle Annual Report February 1, 2016

Bald Eagle Annual Report February 1, 2016 Bald Eagle Annual Report 2015 February 1, 2016 This page intentionally blank. PROJECT SUMMARY Project Title: Bald Eagle HCP Monitoring Subject Area: Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) monitoring Date initiated:

More information

Subject: Comments on FWS R5 ES , Environmental Impact Statement for Beech Ridge Energy s Habitat Conservation Plan

Subject: Comments on FWS R5 ES , Environmental Impact Statement for Beech Ridge Energy s Habitat Conservation Plan October 23, 2012 Public Comments Processing Attn: FWS R5 ES 2012 0059 Division of Policy and Directives Management U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, MS2042 PDM Arlington, VA 22203.

More information