WAS IT WORTH IT? The journey of embedding sea level rise into the Bass Coast planning Scheme. 23 November 2017

Transcription

1 WAS IT WORTH IT? The journey of embedding sea level rise into the Bass Coast planning Scheme 23 November 2017 Jodi Kennedy, Manager Strategy and growth 1

2 Amendment C82 (LSIO) Adopted 2 June 2016 Resolution to prepare C82 August 2013 Ministerial Authorisation October 2013 Exhibition 13 March 2 May 2014 Council Decision Key Issues 16 July 2014 Panel Hearing + Report Oct/Nov 2014 Council Decision August 2015 Gazetted 2 June

3 The Victorian Planning Scheme which guides land use planning and decision making The LSIO is a planning overlay that sits within the Bass Coast Planning Scheme.

4 What is an LSIO? 4

5 Amendment C82 was a Partnership

6 Background As exhibited, the LSIO affected 1,643 individual dwellings (905 dwellings on Phillip Island and 738 on the mainland) Community Consultation Extended exhibition period (8 weeks rather than calendar month) and accepted many late submissions 2,850 notification letters to owners/ occupiers 32 notification letters to community groups Notification letters included Info Sheet 14 Drop-in sessions across the municipality at least 145 parties Two rounds of ads in local papers 6

7 Background continued Submissions 140 submissions (128 objections) Approx 8% of affected households Many of the submissions to Amendment C82 were from the Cowes East/Silverleaves area Key Issues Concern about the scientific background of the mapping, integrity of the data and probability of such an event occurring 89 submissions Planning for sea level rise in urban areas 2040 or 2100? 26 submissions 7

8 Panel Process Panel Hearing held in Oct 2014 Panel generally supported the amendment, including the use of the LSIO to address coastal inundation as well as the use of the Future Coasts Victorian Coastal Inundation Dataset (VCID) to map coastal inundation extents. 8

9 Release of the Western Port Local Coastal Hazard Assessment 9

10 Release of the Western Port Local Coastal Hazard Assessment Cowes East/Silverleaves showing 2040 (0.2m sea level rise) scenario (Light blue - LSIO Future Coasts mapping, green - WPLCHA mapping) Cowes East/Silverleaves showing 2100 (0.8m sea level rise) scenario (Dark blue - LSIO Future Coasts mapping, red - WPLCHA mapping) 10

11 Why use the WPLCHA? 1. Best available information according to DELWP 2. Panel recommendation - make further amendments to the LSIO as required when further, more detailed modelling becomes available. 11

12 Why use the WPLCHA? Panel said: The use of a 0.2m sea level rise for areas of urban infill is appropriate - It may be that these levels will need to be adjusted once the results of the WPLCHA are made available and in the future, if and when more detailed dynamic modelling of the impacts of sea level rise and flooding have been completed, planning for 0.8m sea level rise may be appropriate in urban infill areas. in circumstances where more detailed modelling has been done; 0.8m sea level rise by 2100 may be able to be applied in urban infill areas at a strategic planning level. 12

13 Planning for sea level rise in urban areas On this issue, the Panel recommended: 1. Apply LSIO in urban areas that correspond to sea level rise of 0.2m by 2040; 2. Apply LSIO boundaries in greenfield areas (outside township boundaries) that correspond to sea level rise of 0.8m by 2100; and 3. Make further amendments to the LSIO as required when further, more detailed modelling information becomes available. 13

14 Why plan for 0.8m sea level rise or 2100? The LSIO can be mapped to 0.8m while an individual development application could continue to be assessed and built in a way that responds to 0.2m sea level rise; Without the LSIO there will be no trigger for considering the impacts of sea level rise on new development (and therefore no opportunity for the two Authorities to undertake their role as the Floodplain Management Authority, nor an opportunity to provide Council with advice on development applications); There is a potential risk of exposure to negligence claims arising from the inconsistent disclosure and application of available information; 14

15 Why plan for 0.8m sea level rise or 2100? (continued) There will be a lack of transparency and information in planning schemes and inconsistency with Property Information Statements regarding identified flood hazard. This is because Property Information Statements issued by Westernport Water identify an inundation hazard on all properties affected by up to 0.8m of sea level rise); There will be inconsistency in the treatment of development proposals in urban and rural areas; and There would be a mismatch of LSIO mapping at the rural/urban interface (Figure 5, below). 15

16 Planning for sea level rise continued Project partners Melbourne Water and West Gippsland CMA disagreed with Panel findings Presented to Council on 4 March 2015 regarding their concerns with planning for 0.2m sea level rise, or the year

17 Council Position 17

18 So Was it worth it? Definitely!! Others are now implementing (but with far greater ease) Since Gazettal: 16 permits approved 0 permits refused 1 permit withdrawn 6 pending decision Demonstrates that the world did not stop, the LSIO is there to inform not prohibit development. 18