DIRECT REFERRAL FROM CONSENT AUTHORITY OF RESOURCE CONSENT APPLICATION. of the Resource Management Act 1991 JOINT EXPERT WITNESS STATEMENT PLANNING
|
|
- Debra Fletcher
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Planning Joint Witness Statement 11 DIRECT REFERRAL WAIHEKE MARINAS LTD (ENV 2013 AKL 00174) DIRECT REFERRAL FROM CONSENT AUTHORITY OF RESOURCE CONSENT APPLICATION IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER of a Notice of Motion under s87g of the Resource Management Act 1991 JOINT EXPERT WITNESS STATEMENT PLANNING DATED: 3 SEPTEMBER 2014 Abbreviations used: AEE ARP:C CMA HGMPA LGA MHWS MMA MZ NZCPS ODP PAUP RMA Section 87F Report The Assessment of Effects on the Environment prepared by the applicant Auckland Regional Plan: Coastal Coastal Marine Area Hauraki Gulf Marine Park Act Local Government Act Mean High Water Springs Mooring Management Area (ARP:C) Mooring Zone (PAUP) New Zealand Coastal Policy Statement Auckland Operative District Plan - Hauraki Gulf Islands Section 2013 Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan Resource Management Act A report on the applications prepared by the Auckland Council 1
2 Planning Joint Witness Statement I 2 INTRODUCTION 1. This signed joint witness statement is written in response to the Court's Minute dated 4 April 2014 which directed Environment Commissioner facilitated conferencing. This requires that the experts seek to identify and reach agreement with the other expert witness(es) on the issues and matters within their field of expertise, and at the conclusion of the conference, prepare and sign a joint witness statement that includes: the issues/matters on which the expert witnesses agree; the issues/matters on which they do not agree, including the reasons for their disagreement. 2. This report relates to the conferencing topic of planning 3. A conferencing meeting was held on 29 th day of August 2014 and reconvened on 1 st day of September Participants were: Nicole Bremner (NB) (for Auckland Council) Max Dunn (MD) (for Waiheke Marinas Ltd) Dave Serjeant (OS) (for Direction Matiatia Inc.) 5. In preparing this statement, the experts have read and understood the Code of Conduct for Expert Witnesses as Included in the Environment Court of New Zealand Practice Note Description of the Site and Project The experts adopted the information contained in the AEE and Section 87F report. 7. Activity status of the applications a. The experts noted that the application involves two options being a reclamation-based marina and a deck-based marina. The reasons for the addition of the deck-based marina are outlined in the Memorandum from Richard Brabant, the applicant's legal counsel, dated 9 April b. There is agreement between the experts that the reclamation-based marina is a Non Complying Activity. c. In the event of a deck-based marina, the experts agree that the proposal is a Discretionary Activity under the ARP:C and the ODP. The proposal is a Non-Complying Activity under the PAUP. The PAUP was publicly notified after the date that the application was lodged, but before the deck-based option was introduced. There Is a difference of opinion in the evidence of MD considering the deck-based marina to be Discretionary overall, and OS considering the deck-based marina to be Non-Complying overall. NB's evidence accords with OS, however, she considers that section 88A needs to be taken into account. The experts agree that this is primarily a legal interpretation matter that is expected to be dealt with in legal submissions by the respective parties. 2
3 Planning Joint Witness Statement I 3 8. Bundling of applications a. In their evidence, the experts agreed that bundling of the applications is an appropriate approach. MD is reviewing his position on this matter and will be addressing this in his rebuttal evidence. Auckland Regional Plan: Coastal - Mooring areas a. There is some uncertainty from the evidence of the different experts, notably Mr Dilley and OS, as to the number of boats that can be moored in the Bay in the future. The planning experts are of the view that the maximum number of moorings is currently addressed through limits in the ARP:C b. The ARP:C limits the number of moorings within the two Matiatia MMA's to 98. The PAUP does not limit the number of moorings for the two Matiatia MZ's, although this could change as a result of the submission and hearing process. MD will cover this matter in rebuttal evidence. Also as noted below the two MZ's are significantly larger than the two MMA's. c. The northern MMA in the ARP:C is 2.7 hectares (approx), and the area of the southern MMA is 3.5 hectares. The areas of the northern MZ and southern MZ in the PAUP are larger at 4.5 hectares and 5.6 hectares respectively. These areas are indicative only, based on scaled dimensions from small maps in the two plans. d. The significance of this is that it is unclear what the overall increase in the number of moored boats in the Bay could be under the PAUP, either with or without a marina. This matter is discussed further below in relation to the Chapter 24 - Moorings, objectives and policies on efficient use of the bay and whether the marina can be expected to result in any rationalisation or limit on the number of moorings, as proposed in the evidence of OS. 9. Auckland Regional Plan: Coastal - Objectives and Policies a. The experts have identified the following objectives and policies of the ARP:C where there is disagreement on whether the proposal is contrary or not: b. NB advised that her only outstanding issues of concern relate to cultural and spiritual considerations (predominantly Chapter 6) and the remaining question of whether there are preferable alternatives to reclamation and dredging (predominantly Chapters 13 and 15). NB's comments on these chapters are provided below. c. Chapter 3 - Natural Character The only provisions under contention between OS and MD are Objective and Policy in relation to the preservation and protection of natural character from inappropriate development. One of the key matters of difference concerns the impact of future development within the Matiatia Gateway Land Unit as provided for in the District Plan. This matter is also noted in item 14 of the Joint Witness Statement of the landscape experts. 3
4 Planning Joint Witness Statemenl14 d. Chapter 6 - Maori Matters of Significance e. The experts were unable to take this discussion any further than as stated in their respective briefs of evidence. The experts reviewed the Joint Witness Statement from the cultural conferencing and understand that item confirms the presence of koiwi in the bay, but the area in relation to the marina is not specified. OS and NB noted that not all relevant parties attended the cultural conferencing. MO understands that Pita Rikys will be considering this matter further in rebuttal evidence on behalf of the applicants. f. Chapter 10 - General OS considered that the proposal is contrary to Objective in terms of maintaining the open space nature of the coastal environment and Policies (a), (c), , and in relation to existing character, cumulative adverse effects, efficient use and cross-boundary resource management as provided for in the OOP Matiatia Gateway Land Unit. MO considers the policy is met, although notes the different landscape expert opinions on natural character. MO intends to address this and the other policy matters in rebuttal evidence. In relation to Policy OS's evidence was that the proposal appeared to be contrary to this policy, however he accepts the conclusions in the Navigation Safety Joint Witness Statement in relation to the safe and efficient passage of vessels. MO considers the policy is met with reference to this same joint witness statement. g. Chapter 11- Activities OS considered that the proposal is contrary to Policy (b) in relation to the accommodation of landward development and the effects of this on traffic, parking and natural character. MO considers that the policy is more specific than OS is indicating and relates more to a requirement that appropriate land-based provisions are made. NB noted that the wording at the start of the Chapter indicates that these provisions specifically apply to the boardwalk, viewing deck and pile mooring components of the proposal. h. Chapter 13 - Reclamation i. OS considers that reclamation Is contrary to Policy (a). NB considers this is the case when read in absolute terms, but notes the introductory phrase refers to 'generally inappropriate' suggesting that exceptions may be contemplated, MO refers to the 'generally inappropriate' prefacing rather than 'prohibitive' wording of the policy, the non-complying activity provisions, the non-complying reclamations approved as part of the Sands pit marina (under construction) and the proposal not being repugnant to the policy. OS also considers that reclamation is contrary to Policy (b) in relation to an existing land based site for marina parking not being demonstrated as being practicable. NB agrees, and also notes that the deck-based proposal appears to 4
5 Planning Joint Witness Statement 15 present a feasible alternative to a reclamation. MD advises that the parking deck is an alternative CMA based method, that alternative land based sites have been investigated and are not practicable and that the applicants will address this matter in rebuttal evidence. i. Chapter 23 - Marinas i. DS considers that the proposal fails to meet Policy in relation to the appropriateness and size of the marina. i iv. NB identifies a conflict with the policy to the extent that a practicable alternative to reclamation has been presented. As to the second part of the policy NB agrees that the size of the reclamation has been minimised. MD remains of the view stated in his evidence that the reclamation is appropriate and minimised. DS also has concerns relating to Policies and , however the content of these policies is addressed more specifically in other policies. The views of MD and NB are unchanged from their evidence. j. Chapter 24 - Moorings i. In his evidence, DS considered the proposal was contrary to Objectives and Having considered the Navigation Safety Joint Witness Statement, DS considers that Objective is met. DS' concerns with Objective remain in relation to efficient use and the proliferation of boat moorings in the Bay, particularly in the enlarged southern mooring zone in the PAUP in the future. NB had no particular concerns with this policy, but considers it would be relevant to consider the potential for significant increases in boat numbers moored compared to current levels as a result of the marina. MD will investigate further the position under the PAUP, including any submissions seeking a limit on moorings in the Bay, and clarify his position in rebuttal evidence. 10. Auckland Operative District Plan - Hauraki Gulf Islands Section 2013 a. Land Units and Notations i. Matiatia Gateway Land Unit The experts note that the ODP land unit provisions provide for significant JTlixed use development and transport facilities to be developed at Matiatia, Mixed Use and Transport Areas MD noted that there are differences between the Mixed Use and Transport Areas in the ODP and the Plan Change to the previous Operative District Plan 1996 that formed the basis of the current Matiatia Land Unit provisions. MD will 5
6 Planning Joint Witness Statement 16 be covering this matter in rebuttal evidence in response to matters raised in the landscape and traffic/transport joint witness statements. b. Objectives and Policies The experts have identified the objectives and policies of the ODP listed below where there is disagreement on whether the proposal is contrary or not. c. Chapter 3 - Strategic Management Areas (Waiheke) i. DS considers the proposal to be contrary to Policies 1 and 4. Policy 1 of Objective provides for 'village' style activities and development. DS considers that the scale of the proposal makes it contrary to this provision. MD questions the application of the 'village' part of the policy to the Matiatia transport gateway provisions in the ODP and even if it does, MD notes that marinas are part of villages e.g. Gulf Harbour and Opua. NB considers that as the reclamation will become part of the District this needs to be considered in the village context of Policy 1. Policy 4 relates to landscape character. DS considers that the reference to coastal landscapes in this policy takes in both the land and water areas of the Bay. NB agrees that the assessment encompasses the proposed reclamation area as this would become part of the District. The planners noted that the subject matter of this policy is addressed in expert landscape evidence and the differences between experts in both landscape and planning evidence remain. d. Chapter 7 - Heritage NB advised that the outstanding issue of concern relates to cultural and spiritual considerations and has not changed her views as a result of the evidence. DS agrees. MD position is generally unchanged, but may be updated in rebuttal evidence, based on rebuttal evidence from Mr Rikys. e. Chapter 13 - Transport DS considers the proposal to be contrary to Objective and Policy 2 thereafter on Wharves, and also Policy 2 relating to Objective Roading, because of the conflict between marina-related traffic and the main wharf's primary function as a transport hub. NB noted her view that elements of inconsistency with the provisions of Chapter 13 remain as appended in Annexure 8 to her 11 July 2014 evidence-in-chief. The planning experts will review this matter after reading the proposed conditions that will come from the Traffic and Transport Joint Witness Statement. 6
7 Planning Joint Witness Statement 17 f. Chapter 10a - Matiatia Land Unit i. OS considers that Policy 1 to Objective 10a about the prioritisation of public transport over private vehicle use is not met by the proposal. MO is of the view that passenger transport will continue to have priority. NB considers that the proposal is partly inconsistent in that marina traffic will pass through a dedicated passenger transport area that is specifically identified in the OOP for this purpose. However, NB considers the proposal may not be contrary to this policy subject to appropriate access controls for the marina car park that would maintain priority for wharf and passenger transport. i iv. OS considers that Policy 2, on the further development of car parking areas which enhance the safety and efficiency of the transport network, is not met by the marina car parking proposal. NB considers that, provided the traffic and parking effects of the proposal can be appropriately dealt with in the manner proposed by the traffic experts, the proposal, while presenting some inconsistencies, will not be contrary to the intent of the Policy. MO notes that the reclamation/deck are located adjacent to the Transport area, where parking facilities, including buildings, are provided for, and the priority of public transport in Ocean View Road will remain. OS considers that Policy 4, on the potential relocation of Ocean View Road, is not met as the need for marina access will hamper outcomes for gateway redevelopment. NB considers the proposal to be inconsistent with the Policy, however given it is likely that some form of vehicle thoroughfare for wharf traffic will be required in any future design, Is of the view that the proposal is not contrary to the Policy. v. MO considers the Policy is met, and notes that relocation of Ocean View Road is provided for already, and does not appear to be a precursor to redevelopment of the land unit, nor be affected by the marina proposal. MO will review this aspect further and cover in rebuttal evidence. vi. v vi OS considers that Policy 6, on avoiding medium to large scale car parking areas adjoining the esplanade or visible to those arriving at Matiatia, is not met by the proposed car parking for the marina. NB agrees there is a partial inconsistency with aspects of the policy concerning the siting of the reclamation car park, however adopts Mr Brown's expert landscape advice that the adverse effects on landscape character are acceptable. MO considers the Policy is met, as the marina parking area will be located adjacent to an historic reserve rather than an esplanade reserve, which is to the south of the wharf. Also, MO also the marina parking area will be effectively screened from those arriving at Matiatia by ferry by the existing and proposed structures. 7
8 Planning Joint Witness Statement I 8 g. Rules relating to parking activities on the reclamation The difference of opinion in the evidence of MD and NB as to the status of activities upon the reclamation remains. MD considers the parking to be an innominate (Discretionary) activity and NB considers this to be Non-Complying. DS agrees with NB on this matter. 11. Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan a. Management Areas and Notations i. Mooring Zone See note in 9 j. above under ARP:C regarding the extent of the Mooring Zone and the number of boats provided for therein. Historic Heritage (site or place of value to Mana Whenua) Overlay The experts agree that the overlay shown in the PAUP relates to a single landbased, recorded archaeological site, which covers land area and water (CMA) areas. Part of the proposed marina is affected by part of the overlay. The experts note that, in s7.4.1 of the Cultural joint witness statement, there is reference to a heritage protection overlay recording all known archaeological sites in Matiatia Bay. The planners are not aware if this is intended to refer to the same overlay, as there appears to be some potential conflict between the two understandings. b. Objectives and Policies DS and NB agree that little weight should be given to the objectives and policies of the PAUP. MD generally agrees, but in rebuttal evidence will give further attention to any PAUP provisions where the Council has signalled a significant policy shift. 12. RMA Framework a. Permitted Baseline - Under the ARP:C up to 98 moorings are permitted. There is no numerical limit under the PAUP, but there is an area limit. b. Existing Environment - The experts agree that the boat grid forms part of the existing environment. The experts are not aware of any approved but unimplemented resource consents that would have a bearing on their conclusions but will check prior to the hearing. 13. Section 104 Gateway Test for Non-complying Activities a. DS considers that the application is a non-complying activity irrespective of whether the parking area is reclamation or deck-based, and that the application does not meet either of the gateway tests. NB considers that the proposal fails the effects test, however, it potentially passes the second (objectives and policies) gateway test. NB qualifies this statement by reiterating that there are unresolved cultural and spiritual matters, and a remaining issue of what alternatives there are to reclamation and dredging. MD has a 8
9 Planning Joint Witness Statement I 9 different view, and considers that both gateway tests are met as outlined in evidence. MO expects that, with reference to the other joint witness statements, that any more than minor archaeological, navigation/safety and noise effects are able to be dealt with through consent conditions and this is likely to be the same for ecological/water quality and traffic/parking effects (once conditions are formulated), but that there are significant remaining differences of opinion on cultural and landscape/natural character effects. b. The experts noted that if the deck-based marina is a discretionary activity this does not require an analysis under S1040 RMA. 14. New Zealand Coastal Policy Statement a. The experts have identified the following objectives and policies of the NZCPS where there is disagreement on whether the proposal has regard to: b. Objective 3 and Policy 2 in relation to matters of significance to tangata whenua; OS considers that the application does not have regard to these provisions. NB agrees that further consideration of cultural and spiritual values is required under these provisions. MO notes this matter will be covered in rebuttal evidence. c. Policy 4 in relation to integrated management across the line of MHWS; d. Policy 4 requires specific consideration of areas above and below MHWS in an integrated way. OS considers that the application does not have regard to this policy. OS has concerns as to how this applies to parking, and this is addressed in d. below. NB and MO consider the proposal has been addressed in an Integrated way, including across MHWS. e. Policy 6 (1) (b), (e) and (i) in relation to the rate of built development and infrastructure at Matiatia (b), controlling development so as not to compromise the functioning of the transport hub (e), and setting back the car park from the coastal marine area (which is reasonable and practicable) so as to protect natural character, open space and amenity values of the coastal environment (i). f. OS considers the transport hub to be regionally significant infrastructure and that the location of the marina parking will compromise the function of the hub, due to future conflict between access to marina parking and passenger transport. NB agrees that providing for future growth and operation of the transport hub is a critical consideration. MO considers the policies are met as based on other expert evidence the marina will not compromise the transport, natural character and other recorded values of the Matiatia area. g. Policy 6(2) (d) in relation to the car park being located in the CMA generally and whether it has a functional need to. 9
10 Planning Joint Witness Statement 110 OS considers that the car park does not need to be located in the CMA, and an option in the mixed use area needs to be considered. NB reiterated that there is still a question of what alternatives may exist to reclamation within the CMA. In response to a deck based option, NB is of the view that an alternative on land would better meet the policy, but constraints on available land are also noted. As stated earlier, MO confirmed that practicable alternatives to a reclamation or deck will be covered in the applicants rebuttal evidence. h. Policy 10 (3) in relation to whether the reclamation and its intended purpose provides for efficient operation of infrastructure, including ferry terminals and marinas; i. OS considers that while the reclamation might be efficient for the marina, it does not provide for the efficient use of the ferry terminal into the future. i NB notes that the deck-based marina appears to provide a practicable alternative to a reclamation. MO considers the policy is met as the joint witness statement on navigation safety does not appear to identify any matters that will affect the efficiency of the wharfbased part of the ferry terminal. i. Policy 23(5)(a) relates to managing discharges from marine facilities to take all practicable steps to avoid contamination of coastal waters, substrate, ecosystems and habitats, that is more than minor; i. NB notes that while not all matters concerning the assessment of contamination and ecological effects have been resolved in the Joint Witness Statement on Coastal Ecology and Antifouling, proposed conditions of consent may enable this policy to be met. MO understands that the ecological and water quality effects will generally be no more than minor, with the possible exception of contaminant discharges from boat hulls in the longer term, and the experts are preparing a set of conditions that are expected to address this. MD also notes that legal submissions are expected to be made on whether contaminant discharges from boat hulls in the marina are able to dealt with through consent conditions. i OS considers that the policy places an ongoing obligation on the consent holder to ensure that effects are no more than minor and that this needs to be achieved through conditions which set standards and require monitoring and review. MD agrees with this approach and his view is based on a set of reasonable and 10
11 Planning Joint Witness Statement 111 implementable consent conditions being agreed on by the ecology and planning experts. 15. Hauraki Gulf Marine Park Act a. One set of provisions under contention are Sections 8(b), (e) and (f) in relation to the protection of natural resources and the maintenance and enhancement of physical resources. i. OS considers that the application does not have regard to these provisions, in particular the wharf and transport hub, that contribute to the recreation and enjoyment of the Gulf by residents and visitors to Waiheke. MO considers these provisions are met as outlined in evidence-in-chief. i NB has not identified any issue with these provisions that have not been covered by other comments. b. A second set of provisions under contention are Sections (6), 7(2)(a)(i), and 8(c) i. NB considers that further analysis is required on matters of cultural and spiritual significance. i OS agrees with NB. MO considers these provisions are met as outlined in evidence-in-chief. 16. Auckland Regional Policy Statement a. The experts have identified the following objectives and policies of the ARPS where there is disagreement on whether the proposal has regard to the provisions listed below: b. Chapter 3 -Matters of Significance to Iwi i. OS considers that the OMI iwi evidence suggests that regard is not being had to Objective 3.3, and Policy 3.4.1, and Objective and Policy on recognising and providing for the relationship of Maori with special sites and places. NB adds that Objective sets out similar requirements. NB agrees with OS to the extent that further assessment is required. i MO's position is set out in evidence-in-chlef, and may be further addressed through rebuttal evidence. c. Chapter 7 - Coastal Environment 11
12 Planning Joint Witness Statement 112 i. Objective on preserving natural character, and associated Policy (iii) DS considers the application has not avoided, remedied or mitigated the adverse effects of either the car-parking proposal (reclamation or deck), and the proliferation of boats in the Bay. DS does not have concerns about the marina in relation to this objective and policy. NB and MD do not identify any concerns with either provision. Objective on enabling appropriate development in the coastal environment; As set out in relation to and other provisions of the NZCPS and HGMPA, DS considers the proposal has not had regard to this objective. NB and MD do not identify any concerns with this provision. i Objective on achieving integrating management. As set out in relation to other provisions of the NZCPS and HGMPA, DS considers the proposal has not had regard to this objective. NB and MD do not identify any concerns with this provision. 17. Other Matters a. The experts agree that the following documents are relevant to assessing the proposal and that the applicant has given them appropriate regard: i. Matiatia Transport and Directional Plans March NB notes that these documents were produced after the date the then Proposed District Plan 2006 was publicly notified. i Essentially Waiheke (which is explicitly referred to in Part 3 Strategic Management Areas, clause of the ODP) Auckland Transport Plan 2009, Auckland Regional Land Strategy 2010, Auckland Regional Public Transport Plan 2011 (these are strategic planning documents which guide the Matiatia ferry terminal and parking area) The documents in (i) and (ii) were specifically referenced in the section 87F report. b. The experts also considered the following documents: 12
13 Planning Joint Witness Statement 113 i. Hauraki Gulf State of the Environment Report 2011 (referred to in MO evidence) Waiheke Local Board Plan 2011 (referenced in the s87f report). The experts note that there is a new Waiheke Oraft Local Board Plan This has only recently been released and was not taken into account in evidence-in-chief, nor in the s87f report which was prepared in November c. The experts are not aware of any Iwi Management Plans that are relevant. 18. Part 2 of RMA a. The experts agree that there are matters in contention in relation to the following: i. Section 5 i Section 6(a), (e) and (f) Section 7(a), (b), (c) and (f) iv. Section 8 b. The matters in contention have been addressed in more detail in the sections on the national, regional and district plans and policy statements which are set out above. 19. Outcomes from other expert witness conferencing At the preliminary meeting on 26 August 2014, a number of issues were raised by Section 274 parties for consideration by the experts. The issues are listed below, together with the experts' responses. a. Integrated planning, infrastructure planning At the meeting, questions were raised about how the project fits within an integrated planning approach for the area, and in particular the planning for future infrastructure. The experts consider integrated planning, including infrastructure planning, is the primary responsibility of Auckland Council through higher level LGA and RMA processes, and the applicant has limited ability to address this through a resource consent process. This matter has also been addressed in the sections relating to the NZCPS, HGMPA and ARPS above. b. Top-down/bottom up planning approaches At the meeting, a conflict of approach was identified between the local community's plans (bottom up) and wider RMA-based plans (top down). The experts have assessed the application in accordance with s104 and 1040, and the latter directs that a "gateway test" on the OOP and ARP:C be undertaken. The experts note that the community's plans are relevant matters to consider under s1 04(1 )(c). 13
14 Planning Joint Witness Statement 114 c. Relevant plans including non-statutory documents At the meeting, queries were raised as to whether consideration had been given to all relevant plans. The experts are satisfied that consideration has been given to all plans relevant under the RMA, and these plans have been listed in above. d. NZCPS provisions, especially policies 4, 6, 9 The experts have considered all relevant provisions of the NZCPS, of which Policies 4 and 6 are dealt with above. The experts note that Policy 9 relates to Ports serving national and international shipping, and accordingly does not apply to Matiatia, which is addressed in terms of Policy 6. e. Future growth and how this is managed At the meeting there were concerns that the proposed marina could affect future growth of the Matiatia ferry terminal area. The experts hold different opinions on this, which have been set out above in relation to a number of planning provisions. f. Siting of marina next to a transport hub At the meeting, In addition to direct traffic effects, which are addressed below, there was a more strategic concern expressed about the future planning implications of having the proposed marina adjacent to the ferry terminal and future development and links to the passenger transport network for the island. The planning experts hold different views on this matter, as outlined above. g. Traffic effects At the meeting there were concerns raised about the existing traffic congestion around the Matiatia ferry terminal, and the impact that the proposed marina would have on this. Some participants described it as chaotic. The planning experts currently have different views on traffic effects, as outlined above, but note that traffic management is addressed in the joint witness statement on traffic and transport, and that the traffic experts are working on a proposed condition to address this. h. Permitted baseline This was discussed at the meeting and is addressed in Section 12 a. above. i. Water access to marina (kayaks etc) At the meeting, a question was raised about whether kayak access all the way around the marina would be available in the future. While it was indicated at the meeting that it should be possible, the planning experts cannot confirm this, but expect the applicant's engineer and/or navigation expert will be able to clarify this at the hearing. j. WML submission on the PAUP 14
15 Planning Joint Witness Statement 115 At the meeting a concern was raised with the applicant's submission on the PAUP seeking to remove the Historic Heritage Overlay. MD noted at the meeting and as outlined above, that the overlay relates to only one of several recorded archaeological sites around the Northern Bay, and the basis of it, especially in relation to other recorded sites, and application to CMA areas, was not clear. This is a matter that will be addressed through the PAUP submission/hearing process. k. Weight to be afforded to the PAUP This was discussed at the meeting and is addressed in Section 11 b. above. I. Different feeling that would exist with the presence of a Marina, including intangible considerations At the meeting a concern was raised that "a different feel" will exist with the marina in place, and whether this has been taken into consideration. The experts noted that the perceptions and experiences of a place are woven into the expert landscape evidence, and form part of the consideration of amenity values under s7 of the RMA. The planning experts note that there are differences between landscape experts on the extent of these effects. m. What happens beyond the 35 year resource consent term for the marina Prior to the end of the 35 year term, the consent holder would be entitled to seek new consents. n. The need to view Waiheke In a cultural landscape At the meeting a view was expressed that Waiheke needs to be considered in a cultural landscape. The planning experts understand this to mean seeing Matiatia Bay in its historic context, which is important. However, based on the evidence, they disagree as to the potential effects of the proposed marina on the cultural landscape. o. Tourism considerations. At the meeting, effects on the tourism experience were identified as being of concern. The planning experts consider this is related to several of the matters addressed above, and provided these matters are appropriately addressed, do not consider there will be adverse effects on tourism. 20. Draft conditions The planning experts note some differences between the Council's set of proposed conditions and the applicant's set of proposed conditions. This includes the draft amended conditions on a bond, and public access around the proposed parking deck as outlined in NB's evidence. The planning experts also note that the joint witness statements on Traffic and Transport, Noise and Ecology and Anti-fouling are reviewing conditions with a view to submitting a revised set for 15
16 Planning Joint Witness Statement 116 consideration by the Court. The planning experts will endeavour to agree a full set of conditions for consideration by the Court prior to the hearing. 21. Matters raised in other joint witness statements The planning experts have read all of the joint witness statements of other experts and have incorporated their findings where relevant in the statements above. KEY FACTS AND ASSUMPTIONS 22. There was no disagreement between experts on key facts and assumptions. IDENTIFICATION OF DIFFERENCES IN METHODOLOGY 23. There was broad agreement between the experts on the methodologies used. IDENTIFICATION OF PUBLISHED INFORMATION & PRIMARY DATA RELIED ON 24. There was no disagreement between experts on published information and primary data relied upon. DATE: 3 SEPTEMBER 2014 N Bremner M Dunn D Serjeant 16
17 Planning Joint Witness Statement 116 consideration by the Court. The planning experts will endeavour to agree a full set of conditions for consideration by the Court prior to the hearing. 21. Matters raised in other joint witness statements The planning experts have read all of the joint witness statements of other experts and have incorporated their findings where relevant in the statements above. KEY FACTS AND ASSUMPTIONS 22. There was no disagreement between experts on key facts and assumptions. IDENTIFICATION OF DIFFERENCES IN METHODOLOGY 23. There was broad agreement between the experts on the methodologies used. IDENTIFICATION OF PUBLISHED INFORMATION & PRIMARY DATA RELIED ON 24. There was no disagreement between experts on published information and primary data relied upon. DATE: 3 SEPTEMBER 2014 N Bremner M Dunn D Serjeant 16
of the Resource Management Act 1991 ("RMA") PANUKU DEVELOPMENT AUCKLAND LIMITED Applicant AUCKLAND COUNCIL Regulatory Authority
2165 BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND ENV-2018-AKL-000078 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 ("RMA") A N D IN THE MATTER BETWEEN of a direct referral of applications for resource
More informationResource Management Act 1991 ( Act ) KAWARAU JET SERVICES HOLDINGS LIMITED. Appellant QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL.
IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH ENV-2018-CHC-0000 UNDER THE IN THE MATTER OF Resource Management Act 1991 ( Act ) An appeal under Schedule 1, Clause 14(1), of the Act BETWEEN KAWARAU JET SERVICES
More information1.1 Introduction to the Kaikoura District Plan
1. Introduction 1.1 Introduction to the Kaikoura District Plan This document is a Proposed Plan which is the first District Plan prepared under the Resource Management Act (1991) for the Kaikoura District.
More informationBEFORE THE QUEENSTOWN-LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL PROPOSED DISTRICT PLAN HEARINGS PANEL. IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991
BEFORE THE QUEENSTOWN-LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL PROPOSED DISTRICT PLAN HEARINGS PANEL IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND the Proposed District Plan STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF TIMOTHY CARR
More informationof the Resource Management Act 1991 (Act) an application under section 87G of the Act Respondent
IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND IN THE MATTER IN THE MATTER BETWEEN ENV-2013-AKL-000174 of the Resource Management Act 1991 (Act) an application under section 87G of the Act WAIHEKE MARINAS LIMITED
More informationThe Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Trust Board (LDS) Aitutaki Enua Society Incorporated (Aitutaki Enua)
BEFORE THE INDEPENDENT HEARINGS PANEL IN THE MATTER OF: The Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan SUBMITTERS: The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Trust Board (LDS) The Federation of Islamic Associations
More informationENV-2013-AKL (DRAFT) STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF PAUL MONIN (HISTORICAL BACKGROUND) ON BEHALF OF DIRECTION MATIATIA INCORPORATED AND OTHERS
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT IN THE MATTER of a notice of motion under section 87G of the Resource Management Act 1991 (Act) requesting the granting of resource consents to Waiheke Marinas Limited to establish
More informationHEARINGS PANEL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON THE OVERVIEW REPORT
HEARINGS PANEL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON THE PROPOSED KᾹPITI COAST DISTRICT PLAN 2012 OVERVIEW REPORT This page is intentionally blank Hearings Panel Report and Recommendations Reports and Recommendations
More informationAN OVERVIEW OF THE STATE OF MARINE SPATIAL PLANNING IN THE MEDITERRANEAN COUNTRIES MALTA REPORT
AN OVERVIEW OF THE STATE OF MARINE SPATIAL PLANNING IN THE MEDITERRANEAN COUNTRIES MALTA REPORT Malta Environment & Planning Authority May 2007 AN OVERVIEW OF THE STATE OF MARINE SPATIAL PLANNING IN THE
More informationPORT OF POOLE DEVELOPING FOR THE FUTURE
PORT OF POOLE DEVELOPING FOR THE FUTURE Nick Clarke & Kim Moore INTRODUCTION Masterplan the benefits EIA & SEA (Strategic Environmental ) Changes in Marine Licensing. PORT DEVELOPMENT PROCESS Development
More informationQueenstown Park Limited. Appellant. Queenstown Lakes District Council. Respondent NOTICE OF APPEAL ON BEHALF OF QUEENSTOWN PARK LIMITED
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 ( RMA ) AND IN THE MATTER of the Queenstown Lakes Proposed District Plan BETWEEN Queenstown Park Limited Appellant
More informationFurther Submissions Form Proposed Coastal Plan for Taranaki
Further Submissions Form Proposed Coastal Plan for Taranaki Your details Name: Joshua K. O Rourke Organisation: Petroleum Exploration and Production Association of New Zealand Address: Level 6, 5 Willeston
More informationThe INTERREG IV(a) Fostering Long Term Initiatives in Ports project Newhaven Port and Properties Ltd cross border workshop
The INTERREG IV(a) Fostering Long Term Initiatives in Ports project Newhaven Port and Properties Ltd cross border workshop PORT PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT FOR A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE PLANIFICATION, GESTION
More informationNational Grid s commitments when undertaking works in the UK. Our stakeholder, community and amenity policy
National Grid s commitments when undertaking works in the UK Our stakeholder, community and amenity policy Introduction This document describes the ten commitments we have made to the way we carry out
More informationBefore the Environment Court at Auckland ENV-2013-AKL
Before the Environment Court at Auckland ENV-2013-AKL-000174 In the Matter of the Resource Management Act 1991 And In the Matter of Notice of Motion under Section 87G requesting the granting of resource
More informationA New Marine Protected Areas Act
Submission to the Minister of Conservation, the Minister for the Environment, and the Minister for Primary Industries Dr Jan Wright Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment 11 March 2016 Contents
More informationCollaboration Agreement
Collaboration Agreement Central London, West London, Hammersmith & Fulham, Hounslow, Ealing Clinical Commissioning Groups January 2014 Version 5 1 Context In December 2011 the eight North West London (NWL)
More informationChapter 1: Introduction
Chapter 1: Introduction Aim 1 Sustainable Development To guide e development of e Borough and its environs in such a way at a careful balance is maintained between economic, social and environmental aspirations
More informationFiscal 2007 Environmental Technology Verification Pilot Program Implementation Guidelines
Fifth Edition Fiscal 2007 Environmental Technology Verification Pilot Program Implementation Guidelines April 2007 Ministry of the Environment, Japan First Edition: June 2003 Second Edition: May 2004 Third
More informationBefore a Board of Inquiry Transmission Gully Notices of Requirement and Consents
Before a Board of Inquiry Transmission Gully Notices of Requirement and Consents under: the Resource Management Act 1991 in the matter of: Notices of requirement for designations and resource consent applications
More informationHerts Valleys Clinical Commissioning Group. Review of NHS Herts Valleys CCG Constitution
Herts Valleys Clinical Commissioning Group Review of NHS Herts Valleys CCG s constitution Agenda Item: 14 REPORT TO: HVCCG Board DATE of MEETING: 30 January 2014 SUBJECT: Review of NHS Herts Valleys CCG
More informationAboriginal Consultation and Environmental Assessment Handout CEAA November 2014
Introduction The Government of Canada consults with Aboriginal peoples for a variety of reasons, including: statutory and contractual obligations, policy and good governance, building effective relationships
More informationThe following draft Agreement supplements, but does not replace, the MOU by and between the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the California
The following draft Agreement supplements, but does not replace, the MOU by and between the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), which was entered
More informationLYTTELTON PORT RECOVERY PLAN
APPENDICES Draft LYTTELTON PORT RECOVERY PLAN TE HUKIHUKI MAHERE O TE WHAKAORA TE PŪAHA O ŌHINEHOU APPENDICES TO DRAFT LYTTELTON PORT RECOVERY PLAN CONTENTS Appendix 1: Amendments to the Canterbury Regional
More informationA New Marine Protected Areas Act
A New Marine Protected Areas Act SUBMISSION FORM Contact information NAME: Bob Dickinson (Chairperson) ORGANISATION: ADDRESS: Department of Conservation,, COUNTRY: New Zealand TELEPHONE: 03 546 3151 EMAIL:
More informationTELECOMMUNICATION STAKEHOLDERS: AUCKLAND UNITARY PLAN (MARCH 2013 DRAFT)
TELECOMMUNICATION STAKEHOLDERS: AUCKLAND UNITARY PLAN (MARCH 2013 DRAFT) Draft UP document reference Draft Provision Action required / Recommendation Comment / Analysis Part 2 Regional Policy Statement
More informationEast Anglia TWO and East Anglia ONE North. Summary and Approach to Site Selection
East Anglia TWO and East Anglia ONE North Summary and Approach to Site Selection 1 Introduction ScottishPower Renewables (SPR) has recently concluded work in order to inform our onshore site selection
More informationStage 2a Examination: Policy SWDP 45 Directions for Growth Outside the City Administrative Boundary
South Worcestershire Development Plan Stage 2a Examination: Policy SWDP 45 Directions for Growth Outside the City Administrative Boundary 1.0 Environment Agency (EA) 1.1 EA comments: The EA want the footnote,
More informationHerefordshire CCG Patient Choice and Resource Allocation Policy
Reference number HCCG0004 Last Revised January 2017 Review date February 2018 Category Corporate Governance Contact Lynne Renton Deputy Chief Nurse Who should read this All staff responsible for drawing
More informationThis table identifies provisions subject to and consequentially affected by appeals:
Chapter 3 Strategic Direction This table identifies provisions subject to and consequentially affected by appeals: Provision Subject To Appeal (identified in red text in the relevant chapter/s) Strategic
More informationSubmission of the New Zealand Historic Places Trust (NZHPT) on the Marine Reserves Bill
Submission of the New Zealand Historic Places Trust (NZHPT) on the Marine Reserves Bill Summary The scope of our submission covers: Intent Qualified support for the intent of the Marine Reserves Legislation
More informationCOUNTRIES SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE
COUNTRIES SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE The scope of part A of this questionnaire is to give an opportunity to the respondents to provide overall (generic) details on their experience in the safety investigation
More informationCOASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT of the PINELLAS COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Prepared By: The Pinellas County Planning Department as staff to the LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY for THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
More informationPatient Choice and Resource Allocation Policy. NHS South Warwickshire Clinical Commissioning Group (the CCG)
Patient Choice and Resource Allocation Policy (the CCG) Accountable Director: Alison Walshe Director of Quality and Performance Policy Author: Sheila Browning Associate Director Continuing Healthcare Approved
More informationof the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) PANUKU DEVELOPMENT AUCKLAND LIMITED Applicant AUCKLAND COUNCIL
3274 BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) AND IN THE MATTER BETWEEN of a direct referral application under section 87G
More informationGuidance for Industry
Guidance for Industry Formal Dispute Resolution: Scientific and Technical Issues Related to Pharmaceutical CGMP U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug
More informationLYTTELTON PORT RECOVERY PLAN
APPENDICES Preliminary Draft LYTTELTON PORT RECOVERY PLAN TE HUKIHUKI MAHERE O TE WHAKAORA TE PŪAHA O OHINEHOU APPENDICES TO PRELIMINARY DRAFT LYTTELTON PORT RECOVERY PLAN CONTENTS Appendix 1: Method for
More informationMordialloc Bypass Project. Report of Naomi Cavanagh
Mordialloc Bypass Project Report of Naomi Cavanagh 1 Introduction My firm WSP Australia Pty Limited prepared the impact assessment report titled Social Impact Assessment (Report) which is included as Appendix
More informationMEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN ANCI AND THE MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONS
Ministry of Communications MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN ANCI AND THE MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONS For the installation, monitoring, testing and rationalisation of radio base station equipment In view
More informationEnvironmental Assessment in Canada and Aboriginal Law: Some Practical Considerations for Navigating through a Changing Landscape
ABORIGINAL LAW CONFERENCE 2013 PAPER 1.2 Environmental Assessment in Canada and Aboriginal Law: Some Practical Considerations for Navigating through a Changing Landscape These materials were prepared by
More informationTHE RACE FOR SPACE : MAINTAINING THE VALUE OF FISHERIES RIGHTS ALLOCATED TO MAORI AS PART OF TREATY SETTLEMENTS IN NEW ZEALAND
THE RACE FOR SPACE : MAINTAINING THE VALUE OF FISHERIES RIGHTS ALLOCATED TO MAORI AS PART OF TREATY SETTLEMENTS IN NEW ZEALAND Craig Lawson, Te Ohu Kaimoana, laws.lawson@teohu.maori.nz Tania McPherson,
More informationWylfa Nuclear Power Station
Wylfa Nuclear Power Station Environmental Statement Pre-Application Opinion. February 2013 Crown copyright 2011 First published February 2013 You may reuse this information (excluding logos) free of charge
More informationColes Bay Ferry Proposal - point 1 Provide a shorter and safer route for visitors to Coles Bay and Freycinet National Park
Friday 20 th May 2016 Nicholas Johnston Coles Bay Ferry Pty Ltd 14 Invercargill Road Mount Nelson TAS 7007 Dear Mr Johnston, I am writing on behalf of the Swanwick Community Association (SCA) regarding
More informationCHARTER ON THE PROTECTION AND MANAGEMENT OF UNDERWATER CULTURAL HERITAGE (1996)
CHARTER ON THE PROTECTION AND MANAGEMENT OF UNDERWATER CULTURAL HERITAGE (1996) Ratified by the 11th ICOMOS General Assembly in Sofia, Bulgaria, October 1996. INTRODUCTION This Charter is intended to encourage
More informationAt its meeting on 18 May 2016, the Permanent Representatives Committee noted the unanimous agreement on the above conclusions.
Council of the European Union Brussels, 19 May 2016 (OR. en) 9008/16 NOTE CULT 42 AUDIO 61 DIGIT 52 TELECOM 83 PI 58 From: Permanent Representatives Committee (Part 1) To: Council No. prev. doc.: 8460/16
More informationSATELLITE NETWORK NOTIFICATION AND COORDINATION REGULATIONS 2007 BR 94/2007
BR 94/2007 TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACT 1986 1986 : 35 SATELLITE NETWORK NOTIFICATION AND COORDINATION ARRANGEMENT OF REGULATIONS 1 Citation 2 Interpretation 3 Purpose 4 Requirement for licence 5 Submission
More informationREPORT OF DIRECTOR OF CITY OPERATIONS AGENDA ITEM: 7 PORTFOLIO: TRANSPORT, PLANNING & SUSTAINABILITY (COUNCILLOR RAMESH PATEL)
CITY OF CARDIFF COUNCIL CYNGOR DINAS CAERDYDD CABINET MEETING: 14 JULY 2016 CARDIFF STATUE AND MONUMENT PROTOCOL REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF CITY OPERATIONS AGENDA ITEM: 7 PORTFOLIO: TRANSPORT, PLANNING & SUSTAINABILITY
More informationBETWEEN. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans AND
Memorandum of Understanding to advance measures to benefit the recovery of the Southern Resident Killer Whale through Trans Mountain Expansion Project Conditions BETWEEN Her Majesty the Queen in Right
More informationGuidance on design of work programmes for minerals prospecting, exploration and mining permits
MINERALS GUIDELINES JUNE 2017 CROWN MINERALS ACT 1991 MINERALS PROGRAMME FOR MINERALS (EXCLUDING PETROLEUM) 2013 CROWN MINERALS (MINERALS OTHER THAN PETROLEUM) REGULATIONS 2007 Guidance on design of work
More informationDISPOSITION POLICY. This Policy was approved by the Board of Trustees on March 14, 2017.
DISPOSITION POLICY This Policy was approved by the Board of Trustees on March 14, 2017. Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION... 2 2. PURPOSE... 2 3. APPLICATION... 2 4. POLICY STATEMENT... 3 5. CRITERIA...
More informationPublic School Facilities Element
Public School Facilities Element GOAL 1: THROUGH PARTNERSHIPS AND EFFECTIVE COLLABORATION AMONG LOCAL GOVERNMENTS AND THE PINELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, AND BECAUSE OF A SHARED COMMITMENT TO EDUCATIONAL
More informationGoal: Effective Decision Making
Goal: Effective Decision Making Objective 1. Enhance inter-agency coordination Focus on aspects of governmental decision-making (NEPA and other existing siting/regulatory programs) related to marine energy
More informationThe Partnership Process- Issue Resolution in Action
The Partnership Process- Issue Resolution in Action AAPA- Quality Partnership Initiative rd Annual Project Managers Workshop December 5-6, 5 2007 3 rd Charles A. Towsley The Challenge: Environmental Conflict
More informationPEPANZ submission: Managing our oceans - a discussion document on the regulations proposed under the EEZ Bill
29 June 2012 Submission on proposed EEZ regulations policy proposals Ministry for the Environment PO Box 10362 Wellington 6143 PEPANZ submission: Managing our oceans - a discussion document on the regulations
More informationCENTER FOR DEVICES AND RADIOLOGICAL HEALTH. Notice to Industry Letters
CENTER FOR DEVICES AND RADIOLOGICAL HEALTH Standard Operating Procedure for Notice to Industry Letters PURPOSE This document describes the Center for Devices and Radiological Health s (CDRH s, or Center
More informationDraft Policy and Procedures Ngāti Whanaunga Member Registration & Voting Eligibility
Draft Policy and Procedures Ngāti Whanaunga Member Registration & Voting Eligibility Date Prepared: May 24th, 2015 Version of Policy: Version 1.1 Policy Owner: Ngāti Whanaunga Incorporated Society Policy
More informationSTRATEGIC PLAN
Deepwater Group Overview The Deepwater Group Ltd (DWG) is a structured alliance of the quota owners in New Zealand s deepwater fisheries. Any owner of quota for deepwater species may become a shareholder
More informationThe Kendoon to Tongland 132kV Reinforcement Project. Underground Cable Study: Our Approach
The Kendoon to Tongland 132kV Reinforcement Project Underground Cable Study: Our Approach November 2018 Kendoon to Tongland Reinforcement (KTR) Project SP Energy Networks November 2018 This note provides
More informationStatement on variation of 900 MHz and 1800 MHz Wireless Telegraphy Act licences
Statement on variation of 900 MHz and 1800 MHz Wireless Telegraphy Act licences Statement Publication date: 06 January 2011 Contents Section Page 1 Executive summary 1 2 Introduction 2 3 Assessment of
More informationBarristers and Solicitors
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AUTHORITY AT WELLINGTON IN THE MATTER of the Exclusive Economic Zone and Continental Shelf (Environmental Effects) Act 2012 AND IN THE MATTER of applications for marine
More informationclarify the roles of the Department and minerals industry in consultation; and
Procedures for Crown Consultation with Aboriginal Communities on Mineral Exploration Mineral Resources Division, Manitoba Science, Technology, Energy and Mines The Government of Manitoba recognizes it
More information(Non-legislative acts) DECISIONS
4.12.2010 Official Journal of the European Union L 319/1 II (Non-legislative acts) DECISIONS COMMISSION DECISION of 9 November 2010 on modules for the procedures for assessment of conformity, suitability
More informationNew Appendix Aa: Five-Year Housing Land Supply
Appendices: Main Modification SC-MM238 Add a new Appendix Aa after Appendix A. New Appendix Aa: Five-Year Housing Land Supply Five-year housing land supply will be calculated using the Liverpool methodology,
More informationContinuing Healthcare Patient Choice and Resource Allocation Policy
Continuing Healthcare Patient Choice and Resource Allocation Policy Procedure and Guidance April 2015 Version: 1 Ratified by: Date ratified: Name of originator/author: Name of responsible committee/individual:
More informationCity of Kingston Report to Council Report Number
To: From: Resource Staff: Date of Meeting: Subject: Executive Summary: City of Kingston Report to Council Report Number 16-235 Mayor and Members of Council Gerard Hunt, Chief Administrative Officer Lanie
More informationINTERMODAL PLANNING COMMITTEE TERMS OF REFERENCE
INTERMODAL PLANNING COMMITTEE TERMS OF REFERENCE City of Cape Town Adopted by the IPC 13 April 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS Purpose of the Intermodal Planning Committee (IPC) 1. Definitions...4 2. Functions
More informationWhat does the revision of the OECD Privacy Guidelines mean for businesses?
m lex A B E X T R A What does the revision of the OECD Privacy Guidelines mean for businesses? The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development ( OECD ) has long recognized the importance of privacy
More informationNotice of Decision. [2] The subject property is on Plan Blk 1 Lot 51A, located at Avenue NW, within the PU Public Utility Zone.
10019 103 Avenue NW Edmonton, AB T5J 0G9 P: 780-496-6079 F: 780-577-3537 sdab@edmonton.ca edmontonsdab.ca Date: November 2, 2018 Project Number: 286136272-001 File Number: SDAB-D-18-181 Notice of Decision
More informationSF Certified International Shipping Customer Agreement V1.0
SF Certified International Shipping Customer Agreement V1.0 SF Certified International Shipping (further referred as SF CIS ) is a service provided by S.F. Express Co., Ltd. (further referred as SF ) to
More informationGiven FELA s specific expertise, FELA s submissions are largely focussed on policy and law issues related to inshore fisheries.
Environmental Law Association Association 22 Dhanji Street Samabula, Suva Phone: (679) 330 0122 Fax: (679) 330 0122 Website: www.fela.org.fj FELA SUBMISSION TO THE NATIONAL FISHERIES POLICY FELA The primary
More informationUnited Nations Environment Programme
UNITED NATIONS MC UNEP/MC/COP.1/11 Distr.: General 23 May 2017 Original: English United Nations Environment Programme Conference of the Parties to the Minamata Convention on Mercury First meeting Geneva,
More informationRe: Examination Guideline: Patentability of Inventions involving Computer Programs
Lumley House 3-11 Hunter Street PO Box 1925 Wellington 6001 New Zealand Tel: 04 496-6555 Fax: 04 496-6550 www.businessnz.org.nz 14 March 2011 Computer Program Examination Guidelines Ministry of Economic
More informationSUBMISSION ON PLAN CHANGE 34 (LAKE TAUPO EROSION AND FLOOD STRATEGY): BY NGATI KURAUIA HAPŪ.
SUBMISSION ON PLAN CHANGE 34 (LAKE TAUPO EROSION AND FLOOD STRATEGY): BY NGATI KURAUIA HAPŪ. Map 1: Ngāti Kurauia Customary Area of Interest SUMMARY OF KEY SUBMISSION POINTS: 1) Land ownership of Ngati
More informationGROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AVIATION AND CLIMATE CHANGE (GIACC) FOURTH MEETING SUMMARY OF DISCUSSIONS DAY 3
GIACC/4-SD/3 31/8/09 GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AVIATION AND CLIMATE CHANGE (GIACC) FOURTH MEETING (MONTRĖAL, 25 TO 27 MAY 2009) SUMMARY OF DISCUSSIONS DAY 3 Agenda Item 4: Discussions on the tasks identified
More informationRiverside, California A Local Government CEQA Perspective
Historic Resources and CEQA Workshop 6/21/2012 Riverside, California A Local Government CEQA Perspective Erin Gettis, Associate AIA City Historic Preservation Officer and Principal Planner CEQA and Cultural
More informationTHE UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CREATED BY STAFF AND STUDENTS POLICY Organisation & Governance
THE UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CREATED BY STAFF AND STUDENTS POLICY Organisation & Governance 1. INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES 1.1 This policy seeks to establish a framework for managing
More informationIV/10. Measures for implementing the Convention on Biological Diversity
IV/10. Measures for implementing the Convention on Biological Diversity A. Incentive measures: consideration of measures for the implementation of Article 11 Reaffirming the importance for the implementation
More informationCritical Statements on Content and Structure
Towards an ISA Environmental Management Strategy for the Area Critical Statements on Content and Structure 20-24 March 2017 Duncan Currie LL.B. (Hons.) LL.M. duncanc@globelaw.com Overview Legal Requirements
More informationIN THE MATTER OF of the Resource Management Act 1991
2517 BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO AOTEAROA ENV-2018-AKL-000078 IN THE MATTER OF of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER OF of direct referral of applications for resource
More informationSECTION 2 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
SECTION 2 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 2-1 ENGINEER REQUIRED: All plans and specifications for Improvements which are to be accepted for maintenance by the County and private, on-site drainage and grading shall
More informationAppendix D.21 Tseycum First Nation
Appendix D.21 Tseycum First Nation I - Background Information Tseycum First Nation (Tseycum) is located in British Columbia (BC) on the northwest side of the Saanich Peninsula on Vancouver Island, adjacent
More informationCity of San José, California CITY COUNCIL POLICY
City of San José, California CITY COUNCIL POLICY TITLE 1 1 of 6 EFFECTIVE DATE 1/22/91 REVISED DATE 9/16/03 APPROVED BY Council Action - January 22, 1991; August 11, 1992; August 20, 1996 (9d); September
More informationSUSTAINABLE GROWTH AGREEMENT STIRLING COUNCIL AND SCOTTISH ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION AGENCY
SUSTAINABLE GROWTH AGREEMENT STIRLING COUNCIL AND SCOTTISH ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION AGENCY 27 AUGUST 2018 Sustainable Growth Agreement Stirling Council and Scottish Environment Protection Agency 3 OUR JOINT
More informationRuapehu Alpine Lifts. Whakapapa Electrical Network Strategy. Summary Consultation Document. 15 December 2016
Ruapehu Alpine Lifts Whakapapa Electrical Network Strategy Summary Consultation Document 15 December 2016 1. Introduction Local Networks are electricity distribution networks connected to Transpower s
More informationMEASURES TO INCREASE THE EFFICIENCY OF CIF COMMITTEES. CTF-SCF/TFC.11/7/Rev.1 January 27, 2014
MEASURES TO INCREASE THE EFFICIENCY OF CIF COMMITTEES CTF-SCF/TFC.11/7/Rev.1 January 27, 2014 I. INTRODUCTION 1. At the May 2013 CIF Committee meetings, the CIF Administrative Unit was requested to give
More informationCCG 360 o Stakeholder Survey
July 2017 CCG 360 o Stakeholder Survey National report NHS England Publications Gateway Reference: 06878 Ipsos 16-072895-01 Version 1 Internal Use Only MORI This Terms work was and carried Conditions out
More informationBLM S LAND USE PLANNING PROCESS AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT OPPORTUNITIES STEP-BY-STEP
BLM ACTION CENTER www.blmactioncenter.org BLM S LAND USE PLANNING PROCESS AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT OPPORTUNITIES STEP-BY-STEP Planning What you, the public, can do the Public to Submit Pre-Planning During
More informationOffice for Nuclear Regulation
Office for Nuclear Regulation Redgrave Court Merton Road Bootle Merseyside L20 7HS www.hse.gov.uk/nuclear PROJECT ASSESSMENT REPORT Report Identifier: ONR-Policy-all-PAR-11-001 Revision: 2 Project: Implementation
More informationAboriginal Consultation Framework for the Northern Gateway Pipeline Project
Aboriginal Consultation Framework for the Northern Gateway Pipeline Project This document sets out a framework for how the federal government will rely on the Joint Review Panel process to the extent possible
More informationLocal & International Planning Methods & Applications of MSP,
Local & International Planning Methods & Applications of MSP, Marine Spatial Planning (MSP) Hong Kong, Nov 2013 Richard D Colwill Contents 1) Introduction 2) Wind Farm Siting (International & Local) 3)
More informationSubmission to the Governance and Administration Committee on the Births, Deaths, Marriages, and Relationships Bill
National Office Level 4 Central House 26 Brandon Street PO Box 25-498 Wellington 6146 (04)473 76 23 office@ncwnz.org.nz www.ncwnz.org.nz 2 March 2018 S18.05 Introduction Submission to the Governance and
More informationPATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) WORKING GROUP
E PCT/WG/3/13 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH DATE: JUNE 16, 2010 PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) WORKING GROUP Third Session Geneva, June 14 to 18, 2010 VIEWS ON THE REFORM OF THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) SYSTEM
More informationA powerful voice for your business
HAMPSHIRE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OBJECTION TO PORTSMOUTH CITY COUNCIL PLANNING APPLICATION 13/00993/OUT RE-SUMBISSION OF 12/00998/OUT. Trafalgar Wharf, Hamilton Road, Portchester, Portsmouth PO6 4PX Outline
More informationKordia Submission on Preparing for 5G in New Zealand. 8 May 2018
Kordia Submission on Preparing for 5G in New Zealand 8 May 2018 RELEASED: 8 MAY 2018 KORDIA SUBMISSION ON PREPARING FOR 5G IN NEW ZEALAND REV NO: V1.1 Table of Contents 1. Introduction...1 2. Kordia Submission
More informationContents: Part 1 Response to questions about the draft Marine Plans Part 2 Response to questions about the Sustainability Appraisal exercise
Marine Planning Team Marine Management Organisation Response submitted through on-line questionnaire Response submitted: 8 th October 2013 Our ref: MMO/marine planning Your ref: Telephone: 07798 653897
More informationEE Limited - Public Wireless Network Licence Company Registration no First Issued: 26/03/93 - Licence Number: Rev: 20-10/01/17
Office of Communications (Ofcom) Wireless Telegraphy Act 2006 EE Limited - Public Wireless Network Licence PUBLIC WIRELESS NETWORK LICENCE This Licence document replaces the version of the Licence issued
More informationNational Grid Gas Transmission (NGGT) Gas Quality Consultation Questions - Draft
National Grid Gas Transmission (NGGT) Gas Quality Consultation Questions - Draft Existing NTS Entry Connections 1. Do you expect the number of requests by existing NTS entry parties to amend gas quality
More informationUNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT WASHINGTON, D.C October 23, 2003
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT WASHINGTON, D.C. 20240 October 23, 2003 EMS TRANSMISSION 10/23/2003 Instruction Memorandum No. 2003-275 Change 1 Expires: 09/30/2004 In
More informationSBI/SBSTA: Parties move forward on economic diversification and just transition work
122 SBI/SBSTA: Parties move forward on economic diversification and just transition work Kuala Lumpur, 6 June (Hilary Chiew) Parties to the UNFCCC at the recently concluded climate talks in Bonn agreed
More informationAnnex 11 to Working Party 5B Chairman s Report WORKING DOCUMENT TOWARDS A PRELIMINARY DRAFT NEW REPORT ITU-R M.[SNAP]
Radiocommunication Study Groups Source: Document 5B/TEMP/287 Annex 11 to Document 5B/617-E 29 November 2010 English only Annex 11 to Working Party 5B Chairman s Report WORKING DOCUMENT TOWARDS A PRELIMINARY
More information