Our position in 2010: life was good and getting better ITOPF 2010

Transcription

1

2 Our position in 2010: life was good and getting better ITOPF 2010

3

4

5 The Global Industry Response Group (GIRG) set up by IOGP identified five key capability areas 5 Crisis Management 4 Oil Spill Response 3 Relief Wells Safe Drilling Operations 1 Prevention & Drilling Safety 2 Capping and Containment 5

6 The GIRG Process

7 five years eight million US$ nineteen funding members one project manager from IPIECA seventy consultants and contractors two hundred and fifty industry reviewers one hundred and forty visits, workshops & seminars

8 The financial contribution of companies such as these has made this possible

9 OSR JIP what did we do? 1. Short reports (8 10 pages) giving technical advice, clarifying an industry position, stating a current situation, and/or recommending further detailed studies 2. Good Practice Guidance: updating and expanding the IPIECA report series (30 50 pages) became IPIECA - IOGP 3. Recommended Practices ( pages) e.g. Offshore Risk/Response Preparedness Assessment 4. Influencing: work with EMSA, API, IMO; IOPER; and many others both inside and outside of industry 5. Outreach materials, videos/animations, Glance/Scan materials working with U.S. based consultancy The Clearing

10 Significant work with IOPER We continue to work with the International Offshore Petroleum Environmental Regulators Joint meetings, Interspill conference session, inclusion in Australian workshop, meetings with CNLOPB, BSEE, DECC etc..

11 Dispersants Bench scale testing (SINTEF/CEDRE).. but what next? ISO standard? Post-spill dispersant monitoring & SMART Dispersant logistics/supply chain planning

12 Regulatory Approval of Dispersant Products and Authorization for their Use Recognises dispersants place in the response toolkit Assist regulators and interested parties in developing effective regulation Aims to clarify an issue which can be confusing and contentious Potential interest to countries with existing regulation

13 In-Situ burning ISB equipment selection Residue and burn studies

14 Risk Assessment and Response Planning Risk assessment-based methodology for offshore A scenario-based planning standard for an upstream release and estimation of the associated quantities An assessment of environmental/commercial resources at risk An assessment of response resource needs and capability and the ability to cascade resources in to the spill area Embedding the above in contingency planning Proving the response through drills and exercises

15 Just a few of the technical reports Current status and future needs for aerial dispersant application Mutual aid indemnification and liability including legal proforma templates for global use (brokered by IOGP legal committee) Guidelines on oil characterization to inform spill response decisions Assessment of response effectiveness of Oil Spill Response Organizations.. now also an Excel tool and may also be a web app in the near future

16 NEBA (SIMA) Joint work with API How to guidance complements NEBA GPG Primarily for larger or higher consequence spill scenarios Use by planners or responders Develops response strategy maximising mitigation of impacts - across ecological, socio-economic and cultural sensitivities Transparent approach, engages relevant stakeholders - helps communicate strategic decisions

17

18 Surveillance, Modelling & Visualization In-Water Surveillance (BP/Battelle/Oceaneering) 2 docs Surface Surveillance (GeoCento/Kim Partington 3 docs) Metocean Modelling & Prediction (Total/Actimar 1 doc) Metocean Databases (Total/Actimar 1 doc) GIS / Common Operating Picture (Shell/OGC/RDI 1 doc) The COP work is now an OGC Recommended Practice..

19 Common Operating Picture GeoSpatial COP

20

21 JIP20: Key deliverables Values, good practice Two-year program Global Oiled Wildlife Response System Two-year project Involving industry and wildlife response organizations System for Tier 3 mobilization Key deliverables: 1. Governance Structure 2. Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) 3. Animal Care Standards 4. Readiness systems

22

23 RESPONSE Aerial Surveillance of Oil Spills Satellite Remote Sensing of oil Spills In-water Surveillance Dispersants: Sea surface Dispersants: Subsurface At Sea Containment and Recovery In-Situ Controlled Burning Shoreline Response Planning and SCAT Shoreline Cleanup Techniques Inland Responses Waste Management Oiled Wildlife Management Economic Assessment & Compensation Responder Health and Safety STRATEGY Oil Spill Preparedness & Response framework Incident Management Strategies Net Environmental Benefit Analysis (NEBA) PREPAREDNESS Contingency Planning Sensitivity Mapping Tiered Preparedness & Response Training Exercises IMPACTS Impacts on Marine Ecology Impacts on Shorelines

24

25 Tiered Preparedness and Response AS RESPONSE EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES HAVE EVOLVED TO BECOME MORE SPECIALIZED, SO TOO MUST THE TIERED PREPAREDNESS AND RESPONSE MODEL MODERN TECHNOLOGY, ADVANCED LOGISTICS CAPABILITIES, AND NEW COMMUNICATION TOOLS HAVE IMPROVED INDUSTRY S ABILITY TO CASCADE RESOURCES TO AN INCIDENT LOCATION. THE BENEFITS OF TODAY S SPECIALIZATION AND EXPERTISE ARE DIMINISHED IF THEY MUST BE REPLICATED AT EACH OPERATING SITE OR WITHIN EACH COUNTRY. THE MODEL FACILITATES A TIERED RESPONSE BY DEPICTING WHICH RESPONSE CAPABILITIES ARE NEEDED AND IN WHAT TIMEFRAME. IMS EVOLVING MODEL

26 Capabilities of Tiered Preparedness and Response THE FOLLOWING 15 CAPABILITIES ESSENTIALLY REPRESENT THE SCOPE OF TIERED PREPAREDNESS AND RESPONSE: *ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (INCL. SAMPLING) *SOURCE CONTROL SURVEILLANCE, MODELING, AND VISUALIZATION OFFSHORE SURFACE DISPERSANTS *ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT AND COMPENSATION OFFSHORE SUBSEA DISPERSANTS *STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT AND COMMUNICATION IN-SITU CONTROLLED BURNING IMS *WASTE MANAGEMENT AT-SEA CONTAINMENT AND RECOVERY OILED WILDLIFE RESPONSE INLAND RESPONSE PROTECTION OF SENSITIVE RESOURCES SHORELINE AND INLAND ASSESSMENT (SCAT) SHORELINE CLEANUP

27 Good Practice Guidance for an Holistic Oil Spill Capability *Source Control Surveillance, Modeling, and Visualization *Environmental Impact Assessment Offshore Surface Dispersants *Economic Assessment and Compensation Offshore Subsea Dispersants *Stakeholder Engagement and Communication In-situ Controlled Burning *Waste Management At-sea Containment and Recovery Oiled Wildlife Response Inland Response Shoreline Cleanup Protection of Sensitive Resources Shoreline and Inland Assessment (SCAT)

28 Translations

29 4. Roles and responsibilities are clearly stated Our firm view is that ICS or an ICS like approach is required to manage large amounts of equipment, people and transactions However our experience with IMS and ICS is that ICS doesn t always translate well into local coordinated command systems We have designed an IMS which is ICS - like and recognizes multiple command and coordination challenges

30 Government led or Industry led? Government led response e.g. Germany, Denmark Industry response controlled by Government e.g. Brazil, Mexico Industry response regulated by Government e.g. USA, Canada, Greece Combination response e.g. Australia, New Zealand, UK Industry Response (no Government capability) e.g. Lebanon, Mozambique Govt control Industry control Spectrum of control

31 4. Roles and responsibilities are clearly stated Our firm view is that ICS or an ICS like approach is required to manage large amounts of equipment, people and transactions However our experience with IMS and ICS is that ICS doesn t always translate well into local coordinated command systems We have designed an IMS which is ICS - like and recognizes multiple command and coordination challenges

32 Summary: where we have the opportunity to work together with regulators Support efforts to remove or reduce barriers (people, equipment.) Participation in exercises and drills Adopt a risk based approach to offshore response planning Set realistic expectations for OSRO competency and capability Set realistic principles for exercise frequencies and the basics of Contingency Planning

33 Some of our priorities going forward Define a Global Recommended Practice for Net Environmental Benefit Analysis (NEBA now SIMA) Continue to promote ICS or ICS like systems as the default standard IMS globally Work on SMV and especially Common Operating Picture Implement the Global Oiled Wildlife Response System Continue to press regulators to mandate/adopt JIP products where feasible and appropriate Define the integration strategy for JIP into the IPIECA Oil Spill Working Group ( )

34

35 Backup slides

36 1. Governance Recommendation for a future governance system Explore models (i.e. global network) Provide recommendations Outline key steps to establish system (future roadmap)

37 2. Animal Standards Animal Care Principles Good Practice Guide Technical support document Relationship with IPIECA GPG on Wildlife Preparedness & Response Online library of scientific docs/publications

38 3. Operations System Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) Flowcharts and operational guidance documentation for Tier 3: 1. Notification 2. Assessment 3. Response

39 4. Readiness Developing basic readiness tools in the areas of: Equipment (Identification of needs) Training (Defined competencies) Exercises (internal table-top & recommendations) Proposal for future strategies for achieving operational readiness (implemented through future annual investments)