Federal Trade Commission. In the Matter of Google Inc., FTC File No February 8, 2013 Chicago, Illinois
|
|
- Rafe Flynn
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Federal Trade Commission In the Matter of Google Inc., FTC File No February 8, 2013 Chicago, Illinois 1
2 In a land not too far away and a time not too long ago Motorola, Libertyville, Illinois, 2003 ccarani@mcandrews-ip.com 2
3 Rise and Fall January 2007 Ed Zanders, CEO Motorola Steve Jobs, CEO Apple 3
4 The beginning of an epic tale 4
5 Google obtains Motorola Mobility 2012 Google acquires Motorola Mobility for purchase price of $12.5 billion Over 24,000 patents and patent applications Many are essential to industry standards to provide wireless connectivity and internet-related technologies smartphones, tablets, gaming systems, operating systems, HD television, etc. 5
6 sso Interoperability Standard setting can deliver substantial benefits to American consumers, promoting innovation, competition, and consumer choice. 6
7 Metamorphosis Patent 7
8 Metamorphosis Patent 8
9 Metamorphosis Patent Patent Essential to Industry Standard 9
10 Metamorphosis Patent Patent Essential to Industry Standard Market Power 10
11 Enter the Federal Trade Commission Principal Mission: Promotion of consumer protection and the elimination and prevention of anti-competitive business practices. 11
12 History of Safeguarding Integrity of the Standard-Setting Process. In re Dell Computer Corp. (1996) In re Union Oil Company of California (2004) In re Rambus, Inc. (2006) In re Negotiated Data Solutions LLC (2008) In re Robert Bosch GmbH (2012) 12
13 FTC Complaint Violation of Section 5 of the FTC Act Unfair Method of Competition Unfair Business Acts or Practice Google reneged on its FRAND commitments Pursued or threatened to pursue injunctions (district courts/itc) against willing licensors. ccarani@mcandrews-ip.com 13
14 Basic Allegation 14
15 Basic Allegation 15
16 Basic Allegation 16
17 Basic Allegation Patent 1 Patent 2 Patent 3 Patent 4 Patent 5 Patent 6 Patent 7 Patent 8 Patent 9 Patent 10 Patent 11 Patent 12 Patent 13 Patent 14 Patent 15 Patent 16 Patent 17 Patent 18 Patent 19 Patent 20 Patent 21 Patent 22 Patent 23 Patent 24 Patent 25 ccarani@mcandrews-ip.com 17
18 Basic Allegation Patent 1 Patent 2 Patent 3 Patent 4 Patent 5 Patent 6 Patent 7 Patent 8 Patent 9 Patent 10 Patent 11 Patent 12 Patent 13 Patent 14 Patent 15 Patent 16 Patent 17 Patent 18 Patent 19 Patent 20 Patent 21 Patent 22 Patent 23 Patent 24 Patent 25 ccarani@mcandrews-ip.com 18
19 FTC s concerns According to the FTC, if left unchecked, this type of patent hold-up has negative consequences: 1. It can lead to higher prices, as companies may pay higher royalties for the use of Google s patents because of the threat of an injunction, and then pass those higher prices on to consumers. 2. It may cause companies in technology industries to abandon the standard-setting process and limit or forgo investment in new technologies. ccarani@mcandrews-ip.com 19
20 Basic Mechanics of Consent Decree 1. Google must withdraw its claims for injunctive relief on FRANDencumbered SEPs around the world 2. Google cannot seek injunction against a willing licensee 3. Google must offer a FRAND license to any willing licensee who requests one 4. If parties disagree on FRAND rate, go to binding Arbitration or District Court for determination 5. Can Still Argue Justiciability, Invalidity, Infringement, Essentiality ccarani@mcandrews-ip.com 20
21 Threat of Injunction Removed threat of injunction NEGOTIATION LITIGATION/ARBITRATION 21
22 Threat of Injunction Removed threat of injunction NEGOTIATION LITIGATION/ARBITRATION 22
23 Exceptions Google does remain free to seek and enforce injunctions: 1. a potential licensee is outside the jurisdiction of the United States district courts; 2. a potential licensee has stated in writing or in sworn testimony that it will not license the FRAND Patent on any terms, 3. a potential licensee refuses to enter into a license agreement on the terms set by a final court ruling or through binding arbitration; or 4. a potential licensee fails to provide a written confirmation in response to a FRAND Terms Letter from Google ccarani@mcandrews-ip.com 23
24 Effect of Reciprocity Long Arms May Reach Many SEPs 24
25 Public Comments American Arbitration Association American Intellectual Property Law Association Apple Inc. Application Developers Alliance Computer & Communications Industry Ass'n DVB Project Electronic Privacy Information Center Ericsson Inc. F de la Torre, Lydia Ferrell, Myrtle C GTW Associates IEEE Innovation Alliance Intellectual Property Owners Association International Center for Law & Economics Laubscher, Kim Law Office of David Balto Microsoft Corporation Newman, David Qualcomm Incorporated Research In Motion Corp Sokolow, Mark Valley View Corporation Washington Legal Foundation ccarani@mcandrews-ip.com 25
26 Most common refrain Noerr-Pennington Doctrine (e.g., AIPLA) Appealability of arbitrators decision (e.g. Apple) If SSO specifies dispute resolution path, what governs? (e.g. DVB Project) 26
27 Things to keep in mind It is non-binding on other parties It is non-precedential (persuasive? Court? ITC?) There are exceptions. (recall what Apple and Microsoft committed to voluntarily when the Department of Justice and other agencies in Europe were looking into the matter. They both said that they won t seek injunctive relief based on SEPs, ever.) Road map to safe harbor for other parties? ccarani@mcandrews-ip.com 27
28 Injunctive Relief 28
29 In General: Is Injunctive Relief a Credible Threat? ccarani@mcandrews-ip.com 29
30 ebay Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C. 547 U.S. 388 (2006) The patentee must show that: (1) it is likely to succeed on the merits; (2) it is likely to suffer irreparable harm in the absence of preliminary relief; (3) that the balance of the equities tips in the patentee s favor; and (4) that an injunction is in the public interest. ccarani@mcandrews-ip.com 30
31 Is Injunctive Relief a Credible Threat? The patentee must show that: (1) it is likely to succeed on the merits; (2) it is likely to suffer irreparable harm in the absence of preliminary relief; (3) that the balance of the equities tips in the patentee s favor; and (4) that an injunction is in the public interest. ccarani@mcandrews-ip.com 31
32 Is Injunctive Relief a Credible Threat? The patentee must show that: (1) it is likely to succeed on the merits; (2) it is likely to suffer irreparable harm in the absence of preliminary relief; (3) that the balance of the equities tips in the patentee s favor; and (4) that an injunction is in the public interest. interoperability ccarani@mcandrews-ip.com 32
33 Is Injunctive Relief a Credible Threat? The patentee must show that: (1) it is likely to succeed on the merits; (2) it is likely to suffer irreparable harm in the absence of preliminary relief; (3) that the balance of the equities tips in the patentee s favor; and (4) that an injunction is in the public interest. ccarani@mcandrews-ip.com 33
34 Difficulties in Showing Irreparable Harm 1. In view of FRAND commitments haven t SEP holders acknowledged the money will do? ccarani@mcandrews-ip.com 34
35 Difficulties in Showing Irreparable Harm 2. May be difficult to make argument of loss of exclusivity when SEP is rolled into industry standard. In other words, everyone is using it, what s the harm from one more user?? ccarani@mcandrews-ip.com 35
36 Difficulties in Showing Irreparable Harm 3. New Causal Nexus Requirement 36
37 New Causal Nexus Requirement Preliminary Injunction Context If the patented feature does not drive the demand for the product, sales would be lost even if the offending feature were absent from the accused product. Thus, a likelihood of irreparable harm cannot be shown if sales would be lost regardless of the infringing conduct. the requisite causal nexus... can be established by showing either that the patented feature is an affirmative driver of consumer demand, or that [its] absence would suppress consumer demand.ʼ" Apple, Inc. v. Samsung Elecs. Co., 678 F.3d 1314, 1324 (Fed. Cir. 2012) ( Apple I ) Apple, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., 695 F.3d 1370, 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2012) ( Apple II) ccarani@mcandrews-ip.com 37
38 High Bar Permanent Injunction Context Without a causal nexus, this Court cannot conclude that the irreparable harm supports entry of a permanent injunction. Apple, Inc. v. Samsung Elecs. Co., 11-cv-1846, (N.D. Cal Dec. 17, 2012) (J. Koh) ccarani@mcandrews-ip.com 38
39 If No Permanent Injunction Then what? The Court sets a reasonable on-going royalty rate. (See Judge Robart 207 pg opinion setting FRAND rate) But what if Defendant is your Competitor? Is a compulsory license equitable? What if infringed patent is design patent covering flagship product? Is a compulsory license equitable? ccarani@mcandrews-ip.com 39
40 Final Thought With new causal nexus requirement: 1) Are permanent injunctions a credible threat? 2) Are most all litigated patents essentially subject to compulsory licensing (at FRAND rates), such rates to be determined by a judge? Perhaps SEPs and NSEPs are closer than we think ccarani@mcandrews-ip.com 40
41 Presenter Christopher V. Carani, Esq. Shareholder McANDREWS HELD & MALLOY LTD. 500 West Madison St., Suite 3400 Chicago Illinois (Tel) (Fax) Christopher V. Carani, Esq. is a partner and shareholder at the intellectual property law firm of McAndrews, Held & Malloy, Ltd. based in Chicago, Illinois. He is a leading voice in the field of design law. Chris counsels clients on a wide range of strategic design protection and enforcement issues, both in the U.S. and abroad. He is often called upon to render infringement, validity and design-around opinions and serve as a legal consultant/expert in design law cases. Chris currently chairs the American Bar Association s Design Rights Committee, and is the past chair of the American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) Committee on Industrial Designs. In the landmark design patent case Egyptian Goddess v. Swisa, he authored amicus briefs on behalf of the AIPLA at both the petition and en banc stages. In 2009 and , he was an invited speaker at the United States Patent & Trademark Office s ( USPTO ) Design Day. Prior to joining McAndrews, Chris served as a law clerk to the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer at the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. Chris was conferred his Juris Doctorate from The Law School at The University of Chicago. He also holds a Bachelor of Science in Engineering from Marquette University. He is licensed to practice before the U.S. Supreme Court, the U.S. Federal Circuit Court of Appeals and other U.S. District Courts. He is a registered patent attorney licensed to practice before the USPTO. He has published and lectured extensively on design law and is a frequent contributor to CNN on intellectual property law issues. He is also often called upon to provide comment to other media outlets, including New York Times, Wall Street Journal, NPR, PBS TV, CNBC TV, BBC, Bloomberg TV, Reuters, InformationWeek, Fast Company, ComputerWorld, PCWorld, Washington Post, L.A. Times, Chicago Tribune, Forbes, Fortune, and FoxBusiness TV. ccarani@mcandrews-ip.com 41
The Patent Trial of The Century?
Apple v. Samsung: The Rise of Design IP Christopher V. Carani, Esq. Chicago USA Global IP & Innovation Summit Shanghai, China September 4, 2013 The Patent Trial of The Century? 2 1 Largest Patent Infringement
More informationStandard-Essential Patents
Standard-Essential Patents Richard Gilbert University of California, Berkeley Symposium on Management of Intellectual Property in Standard-Setting Processes October 3-4, 2012 Washington, D.C. The Smartphone
More informationPublic Hearings Concerning the Evolving Intellectual Property Marketplace
[Billing Code: 6750-01-S] FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION Public Hearings Concerning the Evolving Intellectual Property Marketplace AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice of Public Hearings SUMMARY:
More informationFTC Approves Nielsen-Arbitron Transaction with Licensing and Divestiture Remedies
WRITTEN BY M. BRINKLEY TAPPAN AND LOGAN M. BREED SEPTEMBER 16-22, 2013 MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS FTC Approves Nielsen-Arbitron Transaction with Licensing and Divestiture Remedies On September 20, the FTC
More informationStandards, Intellectual Property, and Antitrust
Standards, Intellectual Property, and Antitrust Armando Irizarry Counsel for Intellectual Property Federal Trade Commission Washington, DC The views I express are my own and do not necessarily reflect
More informationR. Cameron Garrison. Managing Partner
R. Cameron Garrison Managing Partner cgarrison@lathropgage.com KANSAS CITY 2345 Grand Blvd. Suite 2200 Kansas City, MO 64108 T: 816.460.5566 F: 816.292.2001 Assistant Debbie Adams 816.460.5346 PRACTICE
More informationLarry R. Laycock. Education. Practice Focus. Attorney at Law Shareholder
Larry R. Laycock Attorney at Law Shareholder Larry has extensive experience as lead trial counsel in complex and intellectual property litigation. His practice includes patent, trademark, trade secret,
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case: 16-2422 Document: 29 Page: 1 Filed: 01/27/2017 NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA RESEARCH FOUNDATION, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee
More informationJOSHUA D. WOLSON. Partner. Industries
Partner 1500 Market St., Suite 3500E Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102 Phone (215) 575-7295 Fax (215) 575-7200 jwolson@dilworthlaw.com Assistant: Jeneen Abed Direct (215) 575-7169 jabed@dilworthlaw.com
More informationRyan is a member of California s Central District s pro bono panel. He also currently serves on the Board of Advisors of After- Ryan G.
Biography Ryan has successfully represented some of the world s largest companies in complex commercial litigation. He has tried cases and argued motions state and federal courts across the country. In
More informationApril 21, By to:
April 21, 2017 Mr. Qiu Yang Office of the Anti-Monopoly Commission Of the State Council of the People s Republic of China No. 2 East Chang an Avenue, Beijing P.R. China 100731 By Email to: qiuyang@mofcom.gov.cn
More informationPresentation to NAS Committee on IP Management in Standards-Setting Processes. Dan Bart President and CEO Valley View Corporation November 4, 2011
Presentation to NAS Committee on IP Management in Standards-Setting Processes Dan Bart President and CEO Valley View Corporation November 4, 2011 Who is Dan Bart? Current Chairman of the ANSI IPR Policy
More informationChallenges Facing Entrepreneurs in Enforcing and Licensing Patents
BCLT Symposium on IP & Entrepreneurship Challenges Facing Entrepreneurs in Enforcing and Licensing Patents Professor Margo A. Bagley University of Virginia School of Law That Was Then... Belief that decisions
More informationCPI Antitrust Chronicle October 2013 (1)
CPI Antitrust Chronicle October 2013 (1) Standard Setting: Should There Be a Level Playing Field for All FRAND Commitments? Nadia Soboleva & Lawrence Wu NERA Economic Consulting www.competitionpolicyinternational.com
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION GRAFTECH INTERNATIONAL ) HOLDINGS INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Civil Action No. ) RESEARCH IN MOTION, LTD. and )
More informationHaven t Got Time for the Pain: Resolving IP Rights Without Damage
TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL CORPORATE COUNSEL SYMPOSIUM TUESDAY, OCTOBER 27, 2015 Haven t Got Time for the Pain: Resolving IP Rights Without Damage Brad Botsch Isabella Fu Heather D. Redmond Adam V. Floyd Charlene
More informationRyan N. Phelan. Tel
Ryan N. Phelan Partner Tel 312.474.6607 rphelan@marshallip.com Ryan N. Phelan is a registered patent attorney who counsels and works with clients in intellectual property (IP) matters, with a focus on
More information[TITLE IN CAPS, VERDANA, 32]
[TITLE IN CAPS, VERDANA, 32] Practical implications of the Dutch FRAND-approach G. Theuws Brussels, 22 April 2013 theuwsg@hoyngmonegier.com BACKGROUND Enforcement of standard-essential patents discussed
More informationSome Thoughts on Hold-Up, the IEEE Patent Policy, and the Imperiling of Patent Rights
Some Thoughts on Hold-Up, the IEEE Patent Policy, and the Imperiling of Patent Rights Kurt M. Kjelland Sr. Dir., Legal Counsel 16 th Advanced Patent Law Institute Berkeley Center for Law and Technology
More informationUNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC 20436
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC 20436 In the Matter of CERTAIN ELECTRONIC DEVICES, INCLUDING WIRELESS COMMUNICATION DEVICES, PORTABLE MUSIC AND DATA PROCESSING DEVICES, AND
More informationIntellectual property and competition policy
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Joaquín Almunia Vice President of the European Commission responsible for Competition Policy Intellectual property and competition policy IP Summit 2013 (Paris) 9 December 2013 SPEECH/13/1042
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION NETWORK-1 SECURITY SOLUTIONS, INC., a Delaware corporation, vs. Plaintiff, Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc., a Delaware corporation;
More informationBas de Blank. Representative Engagements. Partner Silicon Valley T E
Practice Areas Intellectual Property U.S. International Trade Commission Patents IP Counseling & Due Diligence Trade Secrets Litigation Honors Top Verdict of the Year awarded by The Daily Journal and The
More informationTHE AMERICA INVENTS ACT NEW POST-ISSUANCE PATENT OFFICE PROCEEDINGS
THE AMERICA INVENTS ACT NEW POST-ISSUANCE PATENT OFFICE PROCEEDINGS By Sharon Israel and Kyle Friesen I. Introduction The recently enacted Leahy-Smith America Invents Act ( AIA ) 1 marks the most sweeping
More informationFROM THE BENCH: LITIGATING PATENT CASES IN THE FEDERAL COURTS
FROM THE BENCH: LITIGATING PATENT CASES IN THE FEDERAL COURTS Panelist Biographies AMECURRENT 720470531.1 05-May-16 15:13 Alan Grimaldi Partner agrimaldi@mayerbrown.com WASHINGTON DC T: +1 202 263 3255
More informationPanel on IP Valuation: How Much is it Worth? How Much Can You Get? How Can You Protect It?
Panel on IP Valuation: How Much is it Worth? How Much Can You Get? How Can You Protect It? Lauren Katzenellenbogen OCBA - Newport Beach, CA, 12PM Sep 26, 2018 About the Speaker Lauren Katzenellenbogen,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE INTELLECTUAL VENTURES II LLC, Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED CANON INC. and CANON U.S.A., INC., Defendants. COMPLAINT
More informationPatent Damages. Presented by Ryan Ford. University of Nevada
The Economics of Patent Damages Presented by Ryan Ford University of Nevada October 8, 2013 - Offices in Emeryville, CA and Pasadena, CA. - Economic consulting services: Antitrust/Competition t/c titi
More informationChina: Patent LAW. Randall Rader Tsinghua University Professor and Advisory Board Chair
China: Patent LAW Randall Rader Tsinghua University Professor and Advisory Board Chair THE GOOD NEWS China really believes in Patents 2 THE BAD NEWS: China really believes in Patents 3 GOOD NEWS 4 Patent
More informationJASON HUSGEN. St. Louis, MO office:
JASON HUSGEN Senior Counsel St. Louis, MO office: 314.480.1921 email: jason.husgen@ Overview Clever, thorough, and with a keen knowledge of the law, Jason tackles complex commercial disputes as part of
More informationIssues and Possible Reforms in the U.S. Patent System
Issues and Possible Reforms in the U.S. Patent System Bronwyn H. Hall Professor in the Graduate School University of California at Berkeley Overview Economics of patents and innovations Changes to US patent
More informationCPI Antitrust Chronicle March 2015 (2)
CPI Antitrust Chronicle March 2015 (2) IEEE Business Review Letter: The DOJ Reveals Its Hand Hugh M. Hollman Baker Botts LLP www.competitionpolicyinternational.com Competition Policy International, Inc.
More informationPartner. Stanford Law Review, Notes
david.siegal@haynesboone.com PRACTICES: Litigation, Government Enforcement and Litigation, SEC Enforcement, Investment Management, Regulatory Compliance, Securities and Shareholder Litigation, Foreign
More informationModelss. patent legislation,
Briefing Paper on Antitrust Issuess Related to Patent Assertion Entity Business Modelss 1. Introduction As the United States continues to develop as an innovation-driven, knowledge-based economy, issues
More informationJohn H. McDowell, Jr.
BIOGRAPHY Partner johnmcdowell@andrewskurth.com Dallas 1717 Main Street, Suite 3700, Dallas, TX 75201 P: +1.214.659.4735 F: +1.214.659.4401 John McDowell is a first-chair trial lawyer hired for complicated,
More informationTheodore A. Schroeder. Focus Areas. Overview
Office Managing Shareholder EQT Plaza 625 Liberty Avenue, 26th Floor 15222 main: (412) 201-7600 direct: (412) 201-7624 fax: (412) 456-2377 tschroeder@littler.com 707 Virginia Street East Suite 1010 Charleston,
More informationCase 4:14-cv BRW Document 58 Filed 12/04/15 Page 1 of 13
Case 4:14-cv-00368-BRW Document 58 Filed 12/04/15 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION COOLING & APPLIED TECHNOLOGY, INC. PLAINTIFF V.
More informationThe problem with software patents
The problem with software patents Software Patents Volume & Inability to Properly Review and Identify Prior Art Quality & Numbers Utility/Necessity, Pace of Change & Period of Protection Anti-Innovation
More informationIs the U.S. Exporting NPE Patent Litigation?
Is the U.S. Exporting NPE Patent Litigation? Chad Pannell, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton Email: cpannell@kilpatricktownsend.com Presented to April 12, 2017 2017 Kilpatrick Townsend Roadmap NPE Litigation
More informationShafeeqa W. Giarratani
Shafeeqa W. Giarratani Office Managing Shareholder Austin 512-344-4723 shafeeqa.giarratani@ogletree.com Shafeeqa Giarratani is co-managing shareholder of the Austin office of Ogletree Deakins. She represents
More informationJay A. Yurkiw. Partner
Jay A. Yurkiw Jay litigates business disputes involving technology, intellectual property, financial services, and contract rights. He regularly advises clients on and litigates, copyright, covenant not
More informationBatya F. Forsyth Partner
Batya is the chair of the firm's Litigation Section and co-chair of the Privacy, Data Security and Information Governance group. She is a Certified Information Privacy Professional (US) with the International
More informationAaron T. Olejniczak is a registered patent attorney and partner at Andrus Intellectual Property Law.
Milwaukee Office p 414.271.7590 e aarono@andruslaw.com Aaron T. Olejniczak is a registered patent attorney and partner at Andrus Intellectual Property Law. Aaron handles a wide variety of intellectual
More informationClarke B. Nelson, CPA, ABV, CFF, CGMA, MBA Senior Managing Director & Founder InFact Experts LLC
Curriculum Vitae Clarke B. Nelson, CPA, ABV, CFF, CGMA, MBA Senior Managing Director & Founder InFact Experts LLC cnelson@infact-experts.com Salt Lake City Office 175 South Main Street, Suite 630 Salt
More informationThe Federal Trade Commission s Assault on IP: Regulatory Patent Reform?
The Federal Trade Commission s Assault on IP: Regulatory Patent Reform? Chris Compton Nov. 5, 2008 High Tech Tuesday Santa Clara University Intellectual Property Association Battlegrounds for FTC Assault
More informationTiffany D. Gehrke. Associate. Tel
Tiffany D. Gehrke Associate Tel 312.474.6656 tgehrke@marshallip.com Tiffany D. Gehrke secures and protects intellectual property rights for a broad range of clients. In this role, her prior experience
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION : : Plaintiff,
Case 107-cv-00451-SSB Doc # 1 Filed 06/08/07 Page 1 of 15 PAGEID # 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION RONALD A. KATZ TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, L.P., 9220
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION ZAVALA LICENSING LLC, Plaintiff, Case No: vs. PATENT CASE KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendant.
More informationCase 1:14-cv AJS Document 1 Filed 08/21/14 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 1:14-cv-00220-AJS Document 1 Filed 08/21/14 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA INTELLECTUAL VENTURES I LLC and INTELLECTUAL VENTURES II LLC v.
More informationPractical Guidelines For IP Portfolio Management
For the latest breaking news and analysis on intellectual property legal issues, visit Law today. www.law.com/ip Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law.com Phone: +1 646
More informationLitigators for Innovators
Litigators for Innovators Concord, MA: 530 Virginia Rd., Concord, MA 01742 Boston, MA: 155 Seaport Blvd., Boston, MA 02210 T: 978-341-0036 T: 617-607-5900 www.hbsr.com www.litigatorsforinnovators.com 9/13
More informationPATENT ELIGIBILITY: WHERE DO WE STAND AFTER ALICE AND ITS PROGENY?
PATENT ELIGIBILITY: WHERE DO WE STAND AFTER ALICE AND ITS PROGENY? Panelist Biographies AMECURRENT 720470531.1 05-May-16 15:31 Andrew J. Pincus Partner apincus@mayerbrown.com WASHINGTON DC T: +1 202 263
More informationSapna W. Palla. New York:
Sapna W. Palla PARTNER spalla@wiggin.com New York: +1 212 551 2844 Sapna is a Partner in the firm's Litigation Department and Intellectual Property Practice Group. Sapna has spent nearly two decades representing
More informationTo the members of the IEEE Standards Association Standards Board:
To the members of the IEEE Standards Association Standards Board: You will soon be asked to vote on a set of proposed clarifications to the section of the IEEE Standards Association (IEEE-SA) By-Laws that
More informationU.S. Patent-Antitrust Interface. Alden F. Abbott, Heritage Foundation Oxford Competition Law Centre June 28, 2014
U.S. Patent-Antitrust Interface Alden F. Abbott, Heritage Foundation Oxford Competition Law Centre June 28, 2014 Introduction My thesis is that antitrust law has gradually weakened U.S. patent rights in
More informationGiovanna Tiberii Weller
Giovanna Tiberii Weller Partner Office: New Haven, CT Phone: 203.575.2651 Fax: 203.575.2600 Email: gweller@carmodylaw.com Service Areas Appeals Employment Litigation Labor & Employment Litigation Products
More informationTrademarks. Fortune 500 companies and organizations of all sizes trust Lathrop Gage to help establish, guard, maintain and enforce trademarks.
Trademarks What's in a name? As much as 85 percent of the market capitalization of today's Fortune 500 now lies in intellectual property rather than tangible assets, and Forbes reports that trademarks
More informationRocco E. Testani, Partner
, Partner 999 Peachtree Street, NE Suite 2300 Atlanta, GA 30309-3996 Office: 404.853.8390 rocco.testani@sutherland.com Rocco Testani represents clients in litigation ranging from complex business disputes
More informationWednesday, March 27, Thursday, March 28, 2019
6:00 8:00 Welcome Reception 7:30 8:30 Breakfast & Registration 8:30 8:45 Welcome and Introductions (Hutz, Powers, Rea, Weinlein) Wednesday, March 27, 2019 Thursday, March 28, 2019 8:45 10:00 [Panel 1]
More informationHow To Draft Patents For Future Portfolio Growth
For the latest breaking news and analysis on intellectual property legal issues, visit Law today. www.law.com/ip Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law.com Phone: +1 646
More informationThe Uneasy Future of Software and Business-Method Patents
The Uneasy Future of Software and Business-Method Patents SD Times March 24, 2010 Yoches, E. Robert, Arner, Erika Harmon, Dubal, Uttam G. Protecting and enforcing IP rights in a high-speed world The world
More informationVistas International Internship Program
Vistas International Internship Program Find Yourself in a Place Where challenges aren t simply accepted, but sought. This is the new age of IP. This is Knobbe Martens. Who We Are Founded in 1962, Knobbe
More informationThe Need To Reform The US Patent System. A Story of Unfair Invalidation for Patents Under Alice 101
The Need To Reform The US Patent System A Story of Unfair Invalidation for Patents Under Alice 101 Act Ted Tsao, is a technology expert and has been an engineer and innovator since 1987. He is the founder
More informationTHE AMERICAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW ASSOCIATION RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING QUALIFICATIONS FOR
THE AMERICAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW ASSOCIATION RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING QUALIFICATIONS FOR THE NEXT DIRECTOR AND DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF THE U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE Revised and approved, AIPLA
More informationGoogle reveal. their secret to a successful IP Litigation strategy. Catherine Lacavera, Director of IP and Litgation, Google
Google reveal their secret to a successful IP Litigation strategy Catherine Lacavera, Director of IP and Litgation, Google Catherine Lacavera is the Director of IP and Litigation at Google. Named one of
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit EVOLUTIONARY INTELLIGENCE LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION, SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS
More informationStrategic Patent Management: An Introduction
Memoranda on legal and business issues and concerns for multiple and business communities Strategic Patent Management: An Introduction 1 Rajah & Tann 4 Battery Road #26-01 Bank of China Building Singapore
More informationChapter 2 FRAND Commitments and Royalties for Standard Essential Patents
Chapter 2 FRAND Commitments and Royalties for Standard Essential Patents D. Scott Bosworth, Russell W. Mangum III and Eric C. Matolo 1 Introduction This chapter addresses the conceptual and practical effect
More informationAlternatives to Ex Ante Disclosure
Alternatives to Ex Ante Disclosure Presented by Michael A. Lindsay Partner, DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP ANSI Legal Issues Forum: Patented Technology in Standards October 13, 2011 1 Overview Policy for ex ante
More informationPaul T. Friedman MANAGING PARTNER, EUROPE EDUCATION BAR ADMISSIONS CLERKSHIPS PRACTICES
Paul T. Friedman MANAGING PARTNER, EUROPE CITYPOINT ONE ROPEMAKER STREET LONDON, UNITED KINGDOM EC2Y 9AW 44 (20) 79204006 PFRIEDMAN@MOFO.COM EDUCATION UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY (A.B., 1976) YALE
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION RADIO TOWER NETWORKS, LLC, Plaintiff, Case No: vs. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ONCOR ELECTRIC DELIVERY COMPANY, LLC, Defendant.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA I. INTRODUCTION
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 FREE STREAM MEDIA CORP., v. Plaintiff, ALPHONSO INC., et al., Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA I. INTRODUCTION Case No. 1-cv-0-RS ORDER DENYING
More informationNos , UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
Nos. 2012-1548, 2012-1549 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT APPLE INC. AND NEXT SOFTWARE, INC. (formerly known as NeXT Computer, Inc.), Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MOTOROLA, INC. (now
More informationCase 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/27/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1
Case 4:16-cv-00746 Document 1 Filed 09/27/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION Neal Technologies, Inc. d/b/a Bullet Proof Diesel
More informationFormation and Management
Speaker 22: 1 Speaker 23: 1 Speaker 24: 1 Patent t Pools: Formation and Management Bill Geary MPEG LA, LLC Susan Gibbs Via Licensing Corporation Garrard R. Beeney Sullivan & Cromwell LLP October 3, 2008
More informationPATENT PROTECTION FOR PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS IN CANADA CHRONOLOGY OF SIGNIFICANT EVENTS
PRB 99-46E PATENT PROTECTION FOR PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS IN CANADA CHRONOLOGY OF SIGNIFICANT EVENTS Margaret Smith Law and Government Division 30 March 2000 Revised 31 May 2000 PARLIAMENTARY RESEARCH BRANCH
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 3:14-cv-1877
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION LAKESOUTH HOLDINGS, LLC, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 3:14-cv-1877 v. Demand for Jury Trial WAL-MART STORES, INC. and
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2006-3321 JUELITHIA G. ZELLARS, v. Petitioner, DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, DECIDED: December 6, 2006 Respondent.
More informationFrançois G. Laugier's Representative Experience
François G. Laugier's Representative Experience Practice Area: International, Mergers & Acquisitions Key Issues: Acquisitions (For Buyer) Client Type: Foreign Publicly-Traded Naval Technology Company Description:
More informationOctober 4 6, Session IV. Do Patent Prosecution Rules and Practices lead to Legal and Commercial Uncertainty?
AIPPI FORUM SINGAPORE October 4 6, 2007 Session IV Do Patent Prosecution Rules and Practices lead to Legal and Commercial Uncertainty? Friday, October 5, 2007 02.00 to 03.30 p.m. Moderator: Shoichi Okuyama
More informationCharles S. Barquist SENIOR COUNSEL EDUCATION BAR ADMISSIONS CLERKSHIPS PRACTICES
Charles S. Barquist SENIOR COUNSEL 707 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD LOS ANGELES, CA 90017-3543 (213) 892-5400 CBARQUIST@MOFO.COM EDUCATION UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN (A.B., 1975) HARVARD LAW SCHOOL (J.D., 1978) BAR
More informationOctober 4 6, Session IX. The legal Problems arising from Auctioning of IPRs. Saturday, October 6, to p.m.
AIPPI FORUM SINGAPORE October 4 6, 2007 Session IX The legal Problems arising from Auctioning of IPRs Saturday, October 6, 2007 10.45 to 12.30 p.m. Moderator: Jochen Bühling (Reporter General of AIPPI)
More informationCase 5:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/06/17 Page 1 of 19
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed /0/ Page of 0 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP Claude M. Stern (Bar No. ) claudestern@quinnemanuel.com Twin Dolphin Dr., th Floor Redwood Shores, CA 0 Phone: (0) 0-000
More informationKarlinsky LLC 570 Lexington Avenue, Suite 1600 New York, NY Tel / Fax
Counsel Karlinsky LLC 570 Lexington Avenue, Suite 1600 New York, NY 10022 Tel 646.380.0036 / 203.570.2310 Fax 646.380.0039 george.hritz@karlinskyllc.com George Hritz resolves disputes. Practicing in New
More informationThe Interplay between Patents and Standards: Empirical Evidence
The Interplay between Patents and Standards: Empirical Evidence Prof. Dr. Knut Blind Technische Universität Berlin, Chair of Innovation Economics Rotterdam School of Management, Chair of Standardisation
More informationRe: Competition and Consumer Protection in the 21st Century Hearings, Project Number P181201
August 18, 2018 United States Federal Trade Commission Office of the Secretary 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite CC-5510 Washington, DC 20580 Re: Competition and Consumer Protection in the 21st Century
More informationAdvocates of Innovation
Who We Are Osha Liang is a full-service, international intellectual property (IP) law firm dedicated to providing the highest quality IP services. With fullyintegrated offices in Houston, Austin, Alexandria,
More informationCase 5:07-cv D Document 1 Filed 06/06/07 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Case 5:07-cv-00650-D Document 1 Filed 06/06/07 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA 1) RONALD A. KATZ TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, L.P., Plaintiff, v. Case No.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION RADIO TOWER NETWORKS, LLC, Plaintiff, Case No: vs. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED CROSSPOINT COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Defendant.
More informationJohn D. Denkenberger Co-Managing Member Chair of Litigation Group
John D. Denkenberger Co-Managing Member Chair of Litigation Group john.denkenberger@cojk.com direct: 206.695.1749 Professional Overview John Denkenberger is a co-managing member of COJK, serves on the
More informationPatents as a regulatory tool
Patents as a regulatory tool What patent offices can do to promote innovation UNECE Team of Specialists on Intellectual Property 'Intellectual Property and Competition Policy' Geneva, 21 June 2012 Nikolaus
More information11th Annual Patent Law Institute
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY Course Handbook Series Number G-1316 11th Annual Patent Law Institute Co-Chairs Scott M. Alter Douglas R. Nemec John M. White To order this book, call (800) 260-4PLI or fax us at
More informationUNION-IP Round Table
UNION OF EUROPEAN PRACTITIONERS IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY UNION EUROPÄISCHER BERATER FÜR GEISTIGES EIGENTUM UNION DES PRATICIENS EUROPÉENS EN PROPRIÉTÉ INTELLECTUELLE UNION-IP Round Table Smart IP - Applying
More informationCPI Antitrust Chronicle April 2012 (2)
CPI Antitrust Chronicle April 2012 (2) Technology Licensing: Evolving Antitrust Standards in the Smartphone and Other Sectors Paul Lugard TILEC (Tilburg Law and Economics Center) at Tilburg University
More informationUnder the Patronage of His Highness Sayyid Faisal bin Ali Al Said Minister for National Heritage and Culture
ORIGINAL: English DATE: February 1999 E SULTANATE OF OMAN WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION Under the Patronage of His Highness Sayyid Faisal bin Ali Al Said Minister for National Heritage and Culture
More informationThis Sticky is a response Note to AAG Delrahim's speech, consider the following:
Assistant Attorney General Makan Delrahim United States Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20530-0001 January 24, 2018 RE: Industry Letter to DOJ Regarding Standards, Innovation
More informationPRACTICE TIPS FOR TRADEMARK PROSECUTION BEFORE THE USPTO
PRACTICE TIPS FOR TRADEMARK PROSECUTION BEFORE THE USPTO HERSHKOVITZ IP GROUP INTA 2012 WASHINGTON, D.C. Presented by Brian Edward Banner www.hershkovitzipgroup.com Who am I? I am an Adjunct Professor
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION AZURE NETWORKS, LLC and TRI-COUNTY EXCELSIOR FOUNDATION, v. Plaintiffs, TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC., FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR,
More informationInternational Intellectual Property Practices
International Intellectual Property Practices FOR: Hussein Akhavannik حسين اخوان نيك Managing Partner International IP Group, LLC Web: www.intlip.com Email: akhavannik@intlip.com Mobile: 0912-817-2669
More informationJames T. (Tim) Shearin Member
James T. (Tim) Shearin Member 850 Main Street P.O. Box 7006 Bridgeport, CT 06601-7006 t 203.330.2240 f 203.576.8888 e jtshearin@pullcom.com James T. (Tim) Shearin is chairman of the firm and former chair
More information