Presentation to NAS Committee on IP Management in Standards-Setting Processes. Dan Bart President and CEO Valley View Corporation November 4, 2011
|
|
- Damian Phillips
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Presentation to NAS Committee on IP Management in Standards-Setting Processes Dan Bart President and CEO Valley View Corporation November 4, 2011
2 Who is Dan Bart? Current Chairman of the ANSI IPR Policy Committee (about 6 years) Past Chairman of ANSI Patent Group (4 years) Past Chairman of the ANSI Copyright Group (2+ years) Worked at GTE over 28 years at Technical and Legal positions Senior Vice President, Standards and Technology Department and CTO at TIA (over 13 years retired end of 2006) 4 th largest ANSI-Accredited SDO On ANSI Board since 1996 and ANSI EXCO for over ten years Current Vice Chair, SGIP IPRWG IPR Presenter at ANSI, NIST, USPTO, USTR, GWU Law School, WMACCA, IPO, AIPLA, etc. Chairman many years at Global Standards Collaboration (GSC) IPRWG Frequent participant in Federal Agency proceedings related to IPR and Standards FTC, DoJ, NIST, USPTO, USTR, etc. Active in ABA Committee that developed Manual on SSO IPR Policies
3 Disclaimer Although I have been involved with many organizations during my professional career, these are my personal views and observations. Although I am an attorney, this presentation is for general education and NOT presented as legal advice, there is currently no attorney/client relationship with you, you should always seek legal advice from your legal counsel. I am NOT seeking a seat on the Committee. I do too much volunteer work related to IPR and Standards already. I do support the work of this Committee and want the output of this Committee to be credible, useful, and not perceived as biased in any way.
4 VVC Comments to NAS Valley View commented to the NAS on the issue of BALANCE of the Committee As an ANSI Auditor, I looked for Balance and the lack of Dominance in Consensus Bodies for SDOs I was auditing. ANSI Essential Requirements Definitions: 1.2 Lack of dominance The standards development process shall not be dominated by any single interest category, individual or organization. Dominance means a position or exercise of dominant authority, leadership, or influence by reason of superior leverage, strength, or representation to the exclusion of fair and equitable consideration of other viewpoints. 1.3 Balance The standards development process should have a balance of interests. Participants from diverse interest categories shall be sought with the objective of achieving balance
5 ANSI Essential Requirements 2.2 Lack of dominance Unless it is claimed in writing (including electronic communications) by a directly and materially affected party that a single interest category, individual or organization dominated the standards development process, no test for dominance is required. 2.3 Balance Historically the criteria for balance are that a) no single interest category constitutes more than one-third of the membership of a consensus body dealing with safety-related standards or b) no single interest category constitutes a majority of the membership of a consensus body dealing with other than safety-related standards. The interest categories appropriate to the development of consensus in any given standards activity are a function of the nature of the standards being developed. Interest categories shall be discretely defined, cover all materially affected parties and differentiate each category from the other categories. Such definitions shall be available upon request. In defining the interest categories appropriate to a standards activity, consideration shall be given to at least the following:...
6 VVC Comments to NAS In reviewing the make up and current affiliations of the proposed committee members the committee looks very unbalanced and dominated by academics. Of the 12 current committee slots, 7 are academics, 2 are from industry, 1 (retired) from an SSO/Trade Association, none from government, and one each Venture Capitalist and Law Firm. It is SSO IPR Policies being studied but very limited SSO involvement, no ANSI participation, and very heavy academic participation. 7 Academia 2 Industry 1 SSO/Trade Assn 0 Government (0 Consumer too) 2 Others (Venture Capitalist and Law Firm involved in Fora/Consortia)
7 Section 15 (FACA) Sec. 15. (a) In general.--an agency may not use any advice or recommendation provided by the Academy of Sciences that was developed by the use of a committee that was created by that academy under an agreement with an agency, unless (b) Requirements.--The requirements referred to in subsection (a) are as follows: (1) The Academy shall determine and provide public notice of the names and brief biographies of individuals that the Academy appoints or intends to appoint to serve on the committee. (B) the committee membership is fairly balanced as determined by the Academy to be appropriate for the functions to be performed, Does this Section apply to THIS COMMITTEE?
8 Principles for SSO IPR Policies (From ANSI Comments to the EU) Principles for SSO IPR Policies include: Transparency Essential information regarding standardization activities is accessible to all interested parties. Openness Participation is open to all affected interests. Impartiality No one interest dominates the process or is favored over another. Effectiveness and Relevance Standards are relevant and effectively respond to regulatory and market needs, as well as scientific and technological developments. Consensus Decisions are reached through consensus among those affected. Performance Based Standards are performance based (specifying essential characteristics rather than detailed designs) where feasible. Coherence The process encourages coherence to avoid overlapping and conflicting standards when appropriate.
9 Principles for SSO IPR Policies (2) (From ANSI Comments to the EU) Principles for SSO IPR Policies include: Due Process Standards development accords with due process so that all views are considered and appeals are possible. Technical Assistance Assistance is offered to developing countries in the formulation and application of standards. In addition, U.S. interests strongly agree that the process should be: Flexible, allowing the use of different methodologies to meet the needs of different technology and product sectors; Timely, so that purely administrative matters do not result in a failure to meet market expectations; and Balanced among all affected interests.
10 Factors in Describing an IPR Policy (From ANSI Comments to the EU) Factors to consider describing an IPR Policy : a. Type of Policy (e.g., does the policy apply to patents, trademarks, copyrights, or all three?); b. Scope of Disclosure (e.g., does the policy apply to just patents that contain essential claims, patents that likely contain essential claims, or the claims themselves; or does the policy not require any specific disclosure information, but rather seeks disclosure that the patent holder just believes that it holds patents with claims that likely will be essential, etc.; or is the policy just participation based with no obligation to disclose, but everyone participating agrees to a licensing commitment, sometimes with the option of opting out specific patented technology; or is it a mixture of the two general approaches?) c. Scope of Licensing Commitment (e.g., does the license commitment apply to just essential patent claims vis-à-vis the final version of the standard, or more broadly to patents generally? Does it apply to patent applications?); d. Timing of Disclosure (e.g., is early disclosure encouraged or is it mandated? If it is mandated, how is that obligation described: is it based on the individual participant s knowledge, or is knowledge imputed to the participant from the participant s employer?)
11 Factors in Describing an IPR Policy (2) (From ANSI Comments to the EU) Factors to consider describing an IPR Policy : e. Patent Searches (does disclosure expressly require or implicitly necessitate the IP holder to conduct patent searches or is disclosure based on the knowledge of the particular persons? Are such implied or express actions reasonable and practical when considering the environment for the standards development and market for the final standard?); f. Form of disclosure (e.g., does the policy require the use of a specific form/content of disclosure?); g. Licensing Assurance (e.g., can the patent holder select from options in terms of its licensing commitment, such as RAND/FRAND,6 RAND/FRAND compensation-free, or neither, or is the commitment pre-selected by the SSO and/or the specific technical committee?); h. Licensing Terms (e.g., does the SSO allow reciprocity, scope of use, disclosure of licensing terms to the standards body ex ante, patent pools, etc.?); i. Enforcement (e.g., how are disputes resolved, what competition laws apply and how many complaints or what litigation has the SSO experienced in the past ten years regarding the implementation of its IPR policy?); and j. Industry Impact (e.g., what are the practical implications of the policy s implementation, particularly as it affects innovation, and the global trade and competitiveness of U.S. industry?).
12 Business Models Drive IPR Policy Debates Different standards activities or policies impact different business models and IP portfolios differently: Licensing model seeking reasonable return on R&D investment Product model monetize IP through products Often defensive approach in standards Do not actively seek licenses from implementers May want to pay lower royalties to reduce costs May want to raise rivals costs Service providers use loss-leader business model (subsidized handsets) to drive monetization of services Consulting model seeking to transfer value quotient from product/licensed IP to bring value to consultant offerings No One Size Fits ALL! See TIA Contribution to GSC-12 IPRWG Doc 11
13 FTC has Recognized Diversity of Needs The FTC has recognized the wide ranging number and diversity of SSOs and that each has unique needs among its members, their business models, and the technology areas that they address. The FTC has advised several parties in its responses to comments in the N-Data proceeding of its understanding that: The Commission understands that standards-development organizations craft rules concerning intellectual property rights that recognize the dynamic character of the standards process, the necessary balancing of the interests of stakeholders in the process, and the varied business strategies of those involved. The content and intention of such rules will be one of several factors to be assessed in determining whether, under any given set of facts, challenged conduct by a holder of intellectual property rights may constitute a violation of the FTC Act. In addition, any such assessment would be likely to include (among other things) the timing and content of any assurances provided the holder of IP rights; the nature, timing and offered justification for any changes in those assurances; and the effects of the conduct on the standard-setting process and competition in relevant markets affected by the standards. As with many other competition-related enforcement matters, the question of liability under the FTC Act likely will turn on a careful assessment of the surrounding facts. (FTC response letter to the American Bar Association)
14 Summary Consider the BALANCE of the Committee Provided Principles and Factors for SSO IPR Policy Evaluations and Descriptions Consider international impacts of anything done or said domestically No one size fits all IPR Policies, that cannot be ranked or graded. Driven by Business Models Need to protect IPR and balance rights of IPR Owners and Users. May want to cover more than just essential patents in standards in the Study but also look to Copyrighted Software in Standards and other forms of IPR, XML, Schema, etc.
TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION (TIA) IPR AND STANDARDIZATION
TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION (TIA) IPR AND STANDARDIZATION International Telecommunication Union, Geneva, Switzerland July 1, 2008 Paul H. Vishny, TIA General Counsel Telecommunications Industry
More informationTHE AMERICAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW ASSOCIATION RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING QUALIFICATIONS FOR
THE AMERICAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW ASSOCIATION RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING QUALIFICATIONS FOR THE NEXT DIRECTOR AND DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF THE U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE Revised and approved, AIPLA
More informationStandard-Essential Patents
Standard-Essential Patents Richard Gilbert University of California, Berkeley Symposium on Management of Intellectual Property in Standard-Setting Processes October 3-4, 2012 Washington, D.C. The Smartphone
More informationAlternatives to Ex Ante Disclosure
Alternatives to Ex Ante Disclosure Presented by Michael A. Lindsay Partner, DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP ANSI Legal Issues Forum: Patented Technology in Standards October 13, 2011 1 Overview Policy for ex ante
More informationRe: The Cabinet s Consultation, Open Standards: Open Opportunities, Flexibility, and Efficiency in Government IT
By Electronic Delivery May 3, 2012 Open Standards Consultation Cabinet Office 4th Floor 1 Horse Guards Road London SW1A 2HQ Re: The Cabinet s Consultation, Open Standards: Open Opportunities, Flexibility,
More informationThe Telecommunications Industry Association (TIA) believes that patents are critical to
June 14, 2011 Federal Trade Commission Office of the Secretary Room H-113 (Annex X) 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20580 Re: Federal Trade Commission Request for Comments and Announcement
More informationINTRODUCTION Standards have become the foundation for information exchange, communications, and entertainment. Today, as in the past, governments deve
Standards have become the foundation for information exchange, communications, and entertainment. Today, as in the past, governments develop or reference standards to protect the safety, security, and
More informationComments of Cisco Systems, Inc.
Comments of Cisco Systems, Inc. in response to Office of Management and Budget Request for Comments Regarding Proposed Revision of OMB Circular No. A-119: Federal Participation in the Development and Use
More informationStandards, Intellectual Property, and Antitrust
Standards, Intellectual Property, and Antitrust Armando Irizarry Counsel for Intellectual Property Federal Trade Commission Washington, DC The views I express are my own and do not necessarily reflect
More informationThe EX ANTE DEBATE. Presented by. Monica M. Barone Sr. Legal Counsel Qualcomm. Monica M. Barone Sr. Legal Counsel Qualcomm
The EX ANTE DEBATE Presented by Monica M. Barone Sr. Legal Counsel Qualcomm Monica M. Barone Sr. Legal Counsel Qualcomm ANSI Legal Issues Forum: Patented Technology in Standards October 13, 2011 1 Standards
More informationIntellectual Property
Tennessee Technological University Policy No. 732 Intellectual Property Effective Date: July 1January 1, 20198 Formatted: Highlight Formatted: Highlight Formatted: Highlight Policy No.: 732 Policy Name:
More informationDiscussion Topic One: Intellectual Property Rights and Global Standards Setting
Discussion Topic One: Intellectual Property Rights and Global Standards Setting Presented by Earl Nied Chair, ANSI Patent Group Program Director of Standards, Intel Corporation Open Forum for Standards
More informationIntellectual Property Ownership and Disposition Policy
Intellectual Property Ownership and Disposition Policy PURPOSE: To provide a policy governing the ownership of intellectual property and associated University employee responsibilities. I. INTRODUCTION
More informationPolicy on Patents (CA)
RESEARCH Effective Date: Date Revised: N/A Supersedes: N/A Related Policies: Policy on Copyright (CA) Responsible Office/Department: Center for Research Innovation (CRI) Keywords: Patent, Intellectual
More informationPolicy Contents. Policy Information. Purpose and Summary. Scope. Published on Policies and Procedures (http://policy.arizona.edu)
Published on Policies and Procedures (http://policy.arizona.edu) Home > Intellectual Property Policy Policy Contents Purpose and Summary Scope Definitions Policy Related Information* Revision History*
More informationCOLLABORATIVE R&D & IP ISSUES IN TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER IN UNIVERSITY SYSTEM
COLLABORATIVE R&D & IP ISSUES IN TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER IN UNIVERSITY SYSTEM Avinash Kumar Addl. Dir (IPR) DRDO HQ, DRDO Bhawan, Rajaji Marg New Delhi- 100 011 avinash@hqr.drdo.in IPR Group-DRDO Our Activities
More informationFacilitating Technology Transfer and Management of IP Assets:
Intellectual Property, Technology Transfer and Commercialization Facilitating Technology Transfer and Management of IP Assets: Thailand Experiences Singapore August 27-28, 2014 Mrs. Jiraporn Luengpailin
More informationONR Strategy 2015 to 2020
Title of publication ONR Strategy 2015 to 2020 Office for Nuclear Regulation Page 1 of 5 Introduction Nick Baldwin, Chair The Energy Act 2013 provided for the creation of ONR as an independent, statutory
More informationIS STANDARDIZATION FOR AUTONOMOUS CARS AROUND THE CORNER? By Shervin Pishevar
IS STANDARDIZATION FOR AUTONOMOUS CARS AROUND THE CORNER? By Shervin Pishevar Given the recent focus on self-driving cars, it is only a matter of time before the industry begins to consider setting technical
More informationPrograms for Academic and. Research Institutions
Programs for Academic and Research Institutions Awards & Recognition #1 for Patent Litigation Corporate Counsel, 2004-2014 IP Litigation Department of the Year Finalist The American Lawyer, 2014 IP Litigation
More informationLoyola University Maryland Provisional Policies and Procedures for Intellectual Property, Copyrights, and Patents
Loyola University Maryland Provisional Policies and Procedures for Intellectual Property, Copyrights, and Patents Approved by Loyola Conference on May 2, 2006 Introduction In the course of fulfilling the
More informationTo Patent or Not to Patent
Mary Juetten, CEO Traklight February 23, 2013 To Patent or Not to Patent Top Intellectual Property (IP) Question: Do I always need a patent for my business idea? The quick answer is no, not always. But
More informationComments on Public Consultation on Proposed Changes to Singapore's Registered Designs Regime
Mr. Simon Seow Director, IP Policy Division Ministry of Law 100 High Street, #08-02, The Treasury Singapore 179434 via email: Simon_Seow@mlaw.gov.sg Re: Comments on Public Consultation on Proposed Changes
More informationGender pay gap reporting tight for time
People Advisory Services Gender pay gap reporting tight for time March 2018 Contents Introduction 01 Insights into emerging market practice 02 Timing of reporting 02 What do employers tell us about their
More informationPatents, Standards and the Global Economy
Patents, Standards and the Global Economy Nikolaus Thumm 5 th Workshop The Output of R&D activities: Harnessing the Power of Patents Data Seville, 19-20 September 2013 SEPs = Standard Essential Patents
More informationThe 45 Adopted Recommendations under the WIPO Development Agenda
The 45 Adopted Recommendations under the WIPO Development Agenda * Recommendations with an asterisk were identified by the 2007 General Assembly for immediate implementation Cluster A: Technical Assistance
More informationEstablishing a Development Agenda for the World Intellectual Property Organization
1 Establishing a Development Agenda for the World Intellectual Property Organization to be submitted by Brazil and Argentina to the 40 th Series of Meetings of the Assemblies of the Member States of WIPO
More informationNew York Bar admission (or eligibility to obtain admission promptly) is required.
Job Opportunities To apply to any of the positions send cover letter referencing job opening with resume and salary requirements to info@bryantrabbino.com Senior Level Corporate Finance Attorney We are
More informationA POLICY in REGARDS to INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY. OCTOBER UNIVERSITY for MODERN SCIENCES and ARTS (MSA)
A POLICY in REGARDS to INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OCTOBER UNIVERSITY for MODERN SCIENCES and ARTS (MSA) OBJECTIVE: The objective of October University for Modern Sciences and Arts (MSA) Intellectual Property
More informationThe stakes within diverse global policy deliberations concerning treatment of Intellectual Property related to standard-setting
The stakes within diverse global policy deliberations concerning treatment of Intellectual Property related to standard-setting ANSI CMF/ICSCA Meeting Agenda 3.4 Miami, Florida: April 10, 2008 Presented
More informationLewis-Clark State College No Date 2/87 Rev. Policy and Procedures Manual Page 1 of 7
Policy and Procedures Manual Page 1 of 7 1.0 Policy Statement 1.1 As a state supported public institution, Lewis-Clark State College's primary mission is teaching, research, and public service. The College
More informationPublic Hearings Concerning the Evolving Intellectual Property Marketplace
[Billing Code: 6750-01-S] FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION Public Hearings Concerning the Evolving Intellectual Property Marketplace AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice of Public Hearings SUMMARY:
More informationTHE UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CREATED BY STAFF AND STUDENTS POLICY Organisation & Governance
THE UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CREATED BY STAFF AND STUDENTS POLICY Organisation & Governance 1. INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES 1.1 This policy seeks to establish a framework for managing
More informationITU Workshop: ICT Standards and Intellectual Property Rights (Geneva, 1 July 2008) Meeting Report
ITU Workshop: ICT Standards and Intellectual Property Rights (Geneva, 1 July 2008) Meeting Report The ITU Workshop: ICT Standards and Intellectual Property Rights organized by the ITU T was held in Geneva
More informationWIPO Development Agenda
WIPO Development Agenda 2 The WIPO Development Agenda aims to ensure that development considerations form an integral part of WIPO s work. As such, it is a cross-cutting issue which touches upon all sectors
More informationIEEE Session #14 Opening Plenary Presentation
IEEE 802.16 Session #14 Opening Plenary Presentation Document Number: IEEE 802.16-01/31 Date Submitted: 2001-07-09 Source: Roger Marks Venue: IEEE 802.16 Session #14 Base Document: none Purpose: To assist
More informationStandards, open standards and Interoperability II September 2005 Sophia Antipolis
Standards, open standards and Interoperability II 20-21 September 2005 Sophia Antipolis Track 3: IPR in Standards Break-out session Room = Amphi Athena co-moderators: Markus Muenkler & Karl Heinz Rosenbrock
More informationContents. 1 Introduction... 1
Contents 1 Introduction... 1 Part I Startup Funding Sources, Stages of the Life Cycle of a Business, and the Corresponding Intellectual Property Strategies for Each Stage 2 Sources of Company Funding...
More informationSubmission to the Productivity Commission inquiry into Intellectual Property Arrangements
Submission to the Productivity Commission inquiry into Intellectual Property Arrangements DECEMBER 2015 Business Council of Australia December 2015 1 Contents About this submission 2 Key recommendations
More informationIdentifying and Managing Joint Inventions
Page 1, is a licensing manager at the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation in Madison, Wisconsin. Introduction Joint inventorship is defined by patent law and occurs when the outcome of a collaborative
More informationHow To Draft Patents For Future Portfolio Growth
For the latest breaking news and analysis on intellectual property legal issues, visit Law today. www.law.com/ip Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law.com Phone: +1 646
More informationA conference hosted by ICC and CCPIT
International Industry and Commerce Intellectual Property Seminar Increasing Economic and Business Competitiveness Using Intellectual Assets 26 October 2012 - Intercontinental Hotel, Beijing A conference
More informationUW REGULATION Patents and Copyrights
UW REGULATION 3-641 Patents and Copyrights I. GENERAL INFORMATION The Vice President for Research and Economic Development is the University of Wyoming officer responsible for articulating policy and procedures
More informationThe high cost of standardization How to reward innovators
The high cost of standardization How to reward innovators Dr. Matteo Sabattini CTO, Sisvel Group London, October 13,2015 www.sisvel.com 1 THE SISVEL GROUP 30+ YEARS OF EXCELLENCE IN LICENSING 100+ ENGINEERS,
More informationGuidelines on Standardization and Patent Pool Arrangements
Guidelines on Standardization and Patent Pool Arrangements Part 1 Introduction In industries experiencing innovation and technical change, such as the information technology sector, it is important to
More informationVistas International Internship Program
Vistas International Internship Program Find Yourself in a Place Where challenges aren t simply accepted, but sought. This is the new age of IP. This is Knobbe Martens. Who We Are Founded in 1962, Knobbe
More informationIntellectual Property. Rajkumar Lakshmanaswamy, PhD
Intellectual Property Rajkumar Lakshmanaswamy, PhD Intellectual Property Patents Trademarks Copyrights Life & Duration Life of utility patent - 17 years from date of issue of Patent if application filed
More informationONLINE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY COURSES BY FEDERATION OF INDIAN CHAMBERS OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY (FICCI) About FICCI Established in 1927, FICCI is the largest and oldest apex business organisation in India.
More informationOffice for Nuclear Regulation Strategy
Office for Nuclear Regulation Strategy 2015 to 2020 Office for Nuclear Regulation page 1 of 12 Office for Nuclear Regulation page 2 of 12 Office for Nuclear Regulation Strategy 2015 to 2020 Presented to
More informationIntellectual Property Policy. DNDi POLICIES
Intellectual Property Policy DNDi POLICIES DNDi hereby adopts the following intellectual property (IP) policy: I. Preamble The mission of DNDi is to develop safe, effective and affordable new treatments
More informationCalifornia State University, Northridge Policy Statement on Inventions and Patents
Approved by Research and Grants Committee April 20, 2001 Recommended for Adoption by Faculty Senate Executive Committee May 17, 2001 Revised to incorporate friendly amendments from Faculty Senate, September
More informationEDUCATION. Our Clients
EDUCATION Our Clients Katten represents a variety of companies in the education industry across the United States, Europe and Asia, including private and publicly held for-profit, postsecondary education
More informationGetting Started. This Lecture
Getting Started Entrepreneurship (MGT-271) Lecture 9-11 This Lecture Intellectual Property Rights Forms of intellectual property Patent, its types and steps to obtaining patent Potential financing sources
More informationWHO WE SERVE. Regulators Business and Law Schools. Executives and Staff Job Seekers & Students
RCA MISSION Protect investors and financial markets as the exclusive authority for compliance education, training, accreditation, certification, skills assessment, and employee development. 1 WHO WE SERVE
More informationIssues and Possible Reforms in the U.S. Patent System
Issues and Possible Reforms in the U.S. Patent System Bronwyn H. Hall Professor in the Graduate School University of California at Berkeley Overview Economics of patents and innovations Changes to US patent
More informationTAM - Technology Asset Management
Coordinating unit: Teaching unit: Academic year: Degree: ECTS credits: 2017 230 - ETSETB - Barcelona School of Telecommunications Engineering 739 - TSC - Department of Signal Theory and Communications
More information2017 World Standards Week ANSI Legal Issues Forum Speaker Biographies
S. Joe Bhatia Opening and Closing Remarks Joe Bhatia has been president and CEO of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) since January 2006. He previously served as executive vice president
More informationSoftware Patent Issues
Software Patent Issues A review of Software Patent Issues for ICT Branch, Industry Canada Presentation July 9, 2003 Russell McOrmond, FLORA Community Consulting http://www.flora.ca/ Outline Introduction
More informationRECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN THE IMEC IP BUSINESS
TTO PRACTICES RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN THE IMEC IP BUSINESS Dr. ir. Vincent Ryckaert, European Patent Attorney IMEC IP Business and Intelligence Director 2012 IN NUMBERS Total revenue (P&L) of 320M, a growth
More informationFiscal 2007 Environmental Technology Verification Pilot Program Implementation Guidelines
Fifth Edition Fiscal 2007 Environmental Technology Verification Pilot Program Implementation Guidelines April 2007 Ministry of the Environment, Japan First Edition: June 2003 Second Edition: May 2004 Third
More informationProposed Accounting Standards Update: Financial Services Investment Companies (Topic 946)
February 13, 2012 Financial Accounting Standards Board Delivered Via E-mail: director@fasb.org Re: File Reference No. 2011-200 Proposed Accounting Standards Update: Financial Services Investment Companies
More informationR. Cameron Garrison. Managing Partner
R. Cameron Garrison Managing Partner cgarrison@lathropgage.com KANSAS CITY 2345 Grand Blvd. Suite 2200 Kansas City, MO 64108 T: 816.460.5566 F: 816.292.2001 Assistant Debbie Adams 816.460.5346 PRACTICE
More informationLife Sciences IP Report
Life Sciences IP Report Facts & Analysis In Partnership With 2017 Consero Group. Reproduction Prohibited. January 2017 Introduction Life Sciences IP Report The competitive advantage for businesses in the
More informationProtecting Your Trade Secrets in Silicon Valley and Beyond
Protecting Your Trade Secrets in Silicon Valley and Beyond Jeffrey D. Polsky, Esq., Partner, Fox Rothschild LLP May 8, 2017 1 Types of Intellectual Property Trademark a recognizable sign, design, or expression
More informationCareer Education Corporation Bear Stearns 2007 SMid-Cap Investor Conference
Career Education Corporation Bear Stearns 2007 SMid-Cap Investor Conference November 13, 2007 Safe Harbor This presentation contains certain forward-looking statements, as defined in Section 21E of the
More informationEnforcement of Intellectual Property Rights Frequently Asked Questions
EUROPEAN COMMISSION MEMO Brussels/Strasbourg, 1 July 2014 Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights Frequently Asked Questions See also IP/14/760 I. EU Action Plan on enforcement of Intellectual Property
More informationPatent. Fish &Richardson
Patent Fish &Richardson > > 0 >> A 5G2 > > 0 0 >> >> 1 8 0 9 G H 3 0 H O 9 P D 4 A 4 4 > 6 7 0 1 6 7 A B 9 3 spark INNOVATION, > * 7 / / / to a protected PORTFOLIO As one of the world s premier intellectual
More informationDanielle Vanderzanden
Danielle Vanderzanden Shareholder Boston 617-994-5724 dani.vanderzanden@ogletreedeakins.com Ms. Vanderzanden is a Shareholder in the Boston Office and Co-Chair of the Firm s Data Privacy Practice Group.
More information19 Progressive Development of Protection Framework for Pharmaceutical Invention under the TRIPS Agreement Focusing on Patent Rights
19 Progressive Development of Protection Framework for Pharmaceutical Invention under the TRIPS Agreement Focusing on Patent Rights Research FellowAkiko Kato This study examines the international protection
More informationUNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC 20436
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC 20436 In the Matter of CERTAIN ELECTRONIC DEVICES, INCLUDING WIRELESS COMMUNICATION DEVICES, PORTABLE MUSIC AND DATA PROCESSING DEVICES, AND
More informationThe Uneasy Future of Software and Business-Method Patents
The Uneasy Future of Software and Business-Method Patents SD Times March 24, 2010 Yoches, E. Robert, Arner, Erika Harmon, Dubal, Uttam G. Protecting and enforcing IP rights in a high-speed world The world
More informationSHORT SUMMARY REPORT OF THE WORKSHOP ON GENETIC INVENTIONS, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS AND LICENSING PRACTICES
SHORT SUMMARY REPORT OF THE WORKSHOP ON GENETIC INVENTIONS, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS AND LICENSING PRACTICES Held in Berlin, Germany 24 and 25 January 2002 1 I. The Berlin Experts Workshop On January
More informationTWO GREAT REASONS FOR YOUR LAW FIRM TO JOIN IPO IN 2019 BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT AND NETWORKING ELEVATE YOUR PROFILE IN A CROWDED IP LEGAL MARKETPLACE
SERVING THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY COMMUNITY WORLDWIDE TWO GREAT REASONS FOR YOUR LAW FIRM TO JOIN IPO IN 2019 BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT AND NETWORKING ELEVATE YOUR PROFILE IN A CROWDED IP LEGAL MARKETPLACE
More informationAdvocates of Innovation
Who We Are Osha Liang is a full-service, international intellectual property (IP) law firm dedicated to providing the highest quality IP services. With fullyintegrated offices in Houston, Austin, Alexandria,
More informationIntellectual Property
Intellectual Property 1 Overview In a progressively uncertain economy, counterfeit products are becoming more prevalent particularly in Vietnam. Therefore, companies should be increasingly vigilant in
More information11th Annual Patent Law Institute
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY Course Handbook Series Number G-1316 11th Annual Patent Law Institute Co-Chairs Scott M. Alter Douglas R. Nemec John M. White To order this book, call (800) 260-4PLI or fax us at
More informationLynn E. Turner Managing Director
Lynn E. Turner Managing Director 725 South Figueroa Street, Suite 2950 Los Angeles, CA 90017 main: 213.222.0870 fax : 888.222.6001 lturner@litinomics.com Lynn E. Turner is a Managing Director within the
More informationTRIPS, FTAs and BITs: Impact on Domestic IP- and Innovation Strategies in Developing Countries
Innovation, Creativity and IP Policy: An Indo-European Dialogue TRIPS, FTAs and BITs: Impact on Domestic IP- and Innovation Strategies in Developing Countries Henning Grosse Ruse NUJS & MPI Collaborative
More informationEnhancing Audit Quality and Transparency Supplement Additional information required by Article 13 of EU Regulation 537/2014
Enhancing Audit Quality and Transparency Supplement Additional information required by Article 13 of EU Regulation 537/2014 December 2017 kpmg.com Contents 1. Network arrangement 1 1.1 Legal structure
More informationAmbassador Rita Hayes
Ambassador Rita Hayes Ambassador Rita Hayes is Chair of Hayes International Advisors, LLC where she counsels industry and institutional leaders on a diverse range of economic, political and regulatory
More informationF98-3 Intellectual/Creative Property
F98-3 (A.S. 1041) Page 1 of 7 F98-3 Intellectual/Creative Property Legislative History: At its meeting of October 5, 1998, the Academic Senate approved the following policy recommendation presented by
More informationApril 21, By to:
April 21, 2017 Mr. Qiu Yang Office of the Anti-Monopoly Commission Of the State Council of the People s Republic of China No. 2 East Chang an Avenue, Beijing P.R. China 100731 By Email to: qiuyang@mofcom.gov.cn
More informationOverview. How is technology transferred? What is technology transfer? What is Missouri S&T technology transfer?
What is technology transfer? Technology transfer is a key component in the economic development mission of Missouri University of Science and Technology. Technology transfer complements the research mission
More informationCarnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace How the U.S. and India could Collaborate to Strengthen Their Bilateral Relationship in the Pharmaceutical Sector Second Panel: Exploring the Gilead-India Licensing
More informationUniversity of West Georgia Summary Report Investigation of Allegations Made Against the Vice President of University Advancement April 8, 2011
University of West Georgia Summary Report Investigation of Allegations Made Against the Vice President of University Advancement April 8, 2011 BACKGROUND ON INVESTIGATION At the request of University of
More informationJASON HUSGEN. St. Louis, MO office:
JASON HUSGEN Senior Counsel St. Louis, MO office: 314.480.1921 email: jason.husgen@ Overview Clever, thorough, and with a keen knowledge of the law, Jason tackles complex commercial disputes as part of
More informationTransparency in Negotiations Involving Norms for Knowledge Goods. What Should USTR Do? 21 Specific Recommendations
What Should USTR Do? 21 Specific Recommendations July 22, 2009 To: United States Trade Representative From: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Essential Action Knowledge Ecology International (KEI) Public
More informationPolicy 7.6 Intellectual Property Policy
Policy 7.6 Intellectual Property Policy Responsible Official: VP for Research Administration Administering Division/Department: Technology Transfer Effective Date: March 15, 2011 Last Revision: July 14,
More informationInvention SUBMISSION BROCHURE PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING BEFORE SUBMITTING YOUR INVENTION
Invention SUBMISSION BROCHURE PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING BEFORE SUBMITTING YOUR INVENTION The patentability of any invention is subject to legal requirements. Among these legal requirements is the timely
More informationAttorney Business Plan. Sample 3
Attorney Business Plan 3 Attorney Business Plan 3 I have been a trial lawyer in Denver for nearly 25 years, the last seven serving as the first-chair litigator at Denver office. At, I have been in charge
More informationIssues at the Intersection of IP and Competition Policy
Issues at the Intersection of IP and Competition Policy WIPO Symposium 11 May 2010 Jeremy West OECD Competition Division jeremy.west@oecd.org The Big Picture IP and competition policy are mostly complementary,
More informationTiffany D. Gehrke. Associate. Tel
Tiffany D. Gehrke Associate Tel 312.474.6656 tgehrke@marshallip.com Tiffany D. Gehrke secures and protects intellectual property rights for a broad range of clients. In this role, her prior experience
More information2011 IPO Corporate IP Management Benchmarking Survey. November Intellectual Property Owners Association
2011 IPO Corporate IP Management Benchmarking Survey November 2011 2011 Intellectual Property Owners Association Table of Contents Page PART I: Organizational Data (Industry sector, total employee numbers,
More informationPOLICY ON INVENTIONS AND SOFTWARE
POLICY ON INVENTIONS AND SOFTWARE History: Approved: Senate April 20, 2017 Minute IIB2 Board of Governors May 27, 2017 Minute 16.1 Full legislative history appears at the end of this document. SECTION
More informationPromoting Public- Private Collaboration
This is an authorized reprint from ASTM Standardization News, Volume 39, Number 4, July/August 2011 ( Copyright 2011 ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959)
More informationShell Trading Gas and Power Company General Manager Regulatory Affairs, December 2, 2002 to Present
MATTHEW J. PICARDI 506 Riverhill Blvd., Niskayuna, New York 12309 (518) 433-0949 (day) (518) 393-0102 (evening) Email: mpicardi@nycap.rr.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Shell Trading Gas and Power Company
More informationChapter 6: Finding and Working with Professionals
Chapter 6: Finding and Working with Professionals Christopher D. Clark, Associate Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics Jane Howell Starnes, Research Associate, Department of Agricultural Economics
More informationUNITAID The HIV/AIDS Medicines Patent Pool Initiative Overview
UNITAID The HIV/AIDS Medicines Patent Pool Initiative Overview December 2009 UNITAID Mission UNITAID's Mission Scale up access to treatment for HIV/AIDS, malaria and TB Leverage price reductions of quality
More informationObservations from Pharma
Observations from Pharma Indian Patent Enforcement in the Chemical Arts Gurmeet Kaur Sidhu, Senior Patent Litigation Counsel London, 26/9/11 a Novartis company The Indian Pharmaceutical sector: Overview
More informationGENEVA WIPO GENERAL ASSEMBLY. Thirty-First (15 th Extraordinary) Session Geneva, September 27 to October 5, 2004
WIPO WO/GA/31/11 ORIGINAL: English DATE: August 27, 2004 WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERT Y O RGANI ZATION GENEVA E WIPO GENERAL ASSEMBLY Thirty-First (15 th Extraordinary) Session Geneva, September 27 to October
More information