Patent Trolls: How To Avoid Being Gobbled Up
|
|
- Alvin Kennedy
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Patent Trolls: How To Avoid Being Gobbled Up Renee L. Jackson Paul B. Klaas Peter M. Lancaster The Dolan Company Vice President and General Counsel Minneapolis, Minnesota Dorsey & Whitney LLP (612) (0) London, England and Minneapolis, Minnesota Dorsey & Whitney LLP (612) Minneapolis, Minnesota J. Thomas Vitt Dorsey & Whitney LLP (612) Minneapolis, Minnesota 1. PowerPoint Contents (available on
2 Patent Trolls: How To Avoid Being Gobbled Up Renee L. Jackson Vice President and General Counsel, The Dolan Company Paul B. Klaas Peter M. Lancaster J. Thomas Vitt Dorsey & Whitney LLP 1
3 Who s a Troll? 2
4 Who s a Troll? The Obvious Ones: Jerome Lemelson The pioneer of trolls 550 patents on bar codes and related technology Over $1 billion in licensing fees Acacia Technologies Over 200 cases filed since 2005 Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing Over 100 cases filed since
5 Who s a Troll? The Not-So-Obvious Ones: Thomas Edison Over 1000 patents, many never practiced Sold many patents to NPEs The Wright Brothers Licensed inventions because they couldn t commercialize them The inventor of xerography Licensed invention because he couldn t commercialize it 4
6 Who s a Troll? Maybe, Maybe Not: Corporate collector of patents for litigation Sole inventor lacking the resources to start a business or protect his inventions Universities and their researchers Failed or formerly producing product company IP-holding subsidiary of large product company All trolls may be NPEs, but not all NPEs are trolls 5
7 How Big Is The Problem? 6
8 Annual NPE Lawsuit Filings
9 Domination of Patent Litigation by NPEs Different percentages of NPE patent case filings, depending upon who s measuring what: 64% overall 19% when universities and independent inventors are excluded 88% against technology firms 40% of financial services cases 30% of software cases 8
10 If Forced to Litigate to the End, Trolls Aren t Successful In all patent cases, patentees win just 26% of fullylitigated cases Software patentees win just 13% of cases, compared to 37% of other patentees NPEs win just 9% of cases 9
11 Average Patent Litigation Costs (According to 2009 AIPLA Statistics) $7,000,000 $6,000,000 $6,250,000 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 $498,000 $967,000 $1,794,000 $3,109,000 $3,731,000 $0 Less than $1 million at risk $1 - $25 million at risk More than $25 million at risk End of Discovery All Costs 10
12 11
13 Types of Troll Cases 12
14 Types of Trolls and Troll Cases The Kings of Troll Litigation: Acacia Technologies Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing Millenium LP Plutus IP Sorensen Research and Development Trust US Ethernet Innovations, LLC 13
15 Business Method Trolls: the Bilski Near Miss Four Justices voted to bar all business method patents, and the Court unanimously concluded that a patent on a hedging method was barred because it was an abstract idea But the majority rejected any categorical disallowance of types of patents, including business method patents: Congress plainly contemplated that the patent laws should be given wide scope and contain a dynamic provision designed to encompass new and unforeseen inventions The Court also rejected adoption of any prior Federal Circuit test for patentability: Nothing in today s opinion should be read as endorsing interpretations of [patentability] that the [Federal Circuit] has used in the past. 14
16 What To Do If You Get Sued 15
17 What You Sometimes Have to Accept Plaintiffs choice of venues: the Eastern District of Texas, the Western District of Wisconsin, and Delaware No counterclaims for trolls own actions Imbalanced discovery burdens, because trolls have few documents Imbalanced impact on business, because trolls have no business to disrupt 16
18 What To Do with a Lawsuit After Being Sued by a Troll 1. Don t feel compelled to cave immediately 2. Call your supplier 3. Consider organization of joint defense 4. Consider Reexamination Request Inter partes or ex parte 5. Move to dismiss under Twombly and Iqbal tests 6. Consider trying to force a change of venue 7. Seek early claim construction or summary judgment motion 17
19 The Re-Examination Option PTO grants 92% of reexamination requests But if it does not succeed, or your case does not get stayed... 18
20 Do Iqbal and Twombley Pleading Requirements Help? Bell Atlantic v. Twombly (2007) and Ashcroft v. Iqbal (2009) vs. Fed. R. Civ. P. 84, Form 18, and McZeal v. Sprint Nextel (Fed. Cir. 2007) Plaintiffs allegations must cross the line from conceivable to plausible 19
21 What is false marking? False Marking: A New Species of Troll? Marking an unpatented article For the purpose of deceiving the public 35 U.S.C
22 Forest Group v. Bon Tool False marking statute s plain language requires imposing a penalty on a per article basis Up to $500 per article, rather than $500 for each false marking decision But: District Courts have wide discretion to set the penalty. In the case of inexpensive mass-produced articles, a court has the discretion to determine that a fraction of a penny per article is a proper penalty. Forest Group, Inc. v. Bon Tool Co., 590 F.3d 1295 (Fed. Cir. 2009) 21
23 Any person may sue The 2010 Explosion in False Marking Litigation As of October 28, 2010, 515 new false marking cases filed since Bon Tool Stauffer v. Brooks Brothers, Inc., F.3d, 2010 WL (Fed. Cir. Aug. 31, 2010) (Section 292 is a qui tam statute, and any person has standing to sue on behalf of the United States) 22
24 Who Are The Plaintiffs? 23
25 Who Are The Targets? Hasbro Electrolux Toys R Us Boeing Procter & Gamble Kimberly-Clark Home Depot Pop Rocks Candy Wham-O The Wiffle Ball Corporation Glock 24
26 How Can Your Company Avoid a False Marking Suit? Most of the suits involve expired patents Check your products, and call your lawyer 25
27 What Is the Real Exposure? Even a fraction of a penny per article piles up fast Wham-O millions of Frisbees Solo Cup billions of plastic cups We don t really know Very few results yet 26
28 How Do You Defend False Marking Claims? 1) Standing challenge Federal Circuit has rejected (Stauffer v. Brooks Brothers) 2) Constitutional challenge 3) Motions to dismiss Role of Fed. R. Civ. P. 9(b)? 4) Motions to transfer venue 5) Quick settlements 6) Defend the merits 27
29 Judicial or Legislative Solutions 28
30 Judicial Patent Reform ebay v. MercExchange (2006) - Injunctions are not automatic, and are unlikely for NPEs MedImmune v. Genentech (2007) Defendants can more easily choose a venue KSR v. Teleflex (2007) Broader challenges to obviousness are available In re Seagate Technology (Fed. Cir. 2007) Enhanced damages and attorney fee awards made less likely Quanta Computer v. LG Electronics (2008) Recovery against manufacturer exhausts rights against downstream purchasers In re TS Tech USA (Fed. Cir. 2008) Transfer ordered out of Eastern District of Texas Lucent v. Gateway and Microsoft (Fed. Cir. 2009) Entire market value rule qualified in vacating $360 million award 29
31 The Problem ebay Addresses NTP v. Research in Motion $600 million settlement to inventor-owned NPE following injunction that threatened to shut down Blackberry service 30
32 ebay There is no bright-line rule: Court rejects the district court s general rule that not practicing the patent may be sufficient basis to deny injunction Court also rejects the Federal Circuit s general rule that an injunction follows determinations of validity and infringement Court holds that injunctions in patent cases should be judged by the traditional four-part equity test 31
33 The ebay Concurrence that Enemies of Trolls Cherish An industry has developed in which firms use patents... primarily for obtaining licensing fees. For these firms, an injunction... can be employed as a bargaining tool to charge exorbitant fees to companies that seek to buy licenses to practice the patent. [Such] an injunction may not serve the public interest. In addition injunctive relief may have different consequences for the burgeoning number of patents over business methods, which were not of much economic and legal significance in earlier times. The potential vagueness and suspect validity of some of these patents may affect the calculus under the four-factor test. 32
34 Will Congress Stem the Tide of False Marking Cases? Congress is considering: Eliminating qui tam plaintiffs, by requiring that the plaintiff suffer a competitive injury Reversing Bon Tool, and limiting fine to $500 per decision H.R. 6352; H.R. 4954; S
35 Comprehensive Patent Reform 34
Haven t Got Time for the Pain: Resolving IP Rights Without Damage
TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL CORPORATE COUNSEL SYMPOSIUM TUESDAY, OCTOBER 27, 2015 Haven t Got Time for the Pain: Resolving IP Rights Without Damage Brad Botsch Isabella Fu Heather D. Redmond Adam V. Floyd Charlene
More informationPublic Hearings Concerning the Evolving Intellectual Property Marketplace
[Billing Code: 6750-01-S] FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION Public Hearings Concerning the Evolving Intellectual Property Marketplace AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice of Public Hearings SUMMARY:
More informationEnterprise Patent Portfolio Commercialization: Trends and Opportunities
Return on Invention EU-JP Technology Transfer Helpdesk Enterprise Patent Portfolio Commercialization: Trends and Opportunities 8 December 2016 George Park Historical Approach to Commercializing Patents
More informationIs the U.S. Exporting NPE Patent Litigation?
Is the U.S. Exporting NPE Patent Litigation? Chad Pannell, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton Email: cpannell@kilpatricktownsend.com Presented to April 12, 2017 2017 Kilpatrick Townsend Roadmap NPE Litigation
More informationThe America Invents Act: Policy Rationales. Arti K. Rai Duke Patent Law Institute May 13, 2013
The America Invents Act: Policy Rationales Arti K. Rai Duke Patent Law Institute May 13, 2013 Background Work began in 2005 15 hearings before House Judiciary Committee, or Subcommittee on Courts, the
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case: 16-2422 Document: 29 Page: 1 Filed: 01/27/2017 NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA RESEARCH FOUNDATION, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee
More informationCase 6:15-cv RWS-CMC Document 78 Filed 02/26/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 4503
Case 6:15-cv-00584-RWS-CMC Document 78 Filed 02/26/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 4503 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION BLUE SPIKE, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Case
More informationChallenges Facing Entrepreneurs in Enforcing and Licensing Patents
BCLT Symposium on IP & Entrepreneurship Challenges Facing Entrepreneurs in Enforcing and Licensing Patents Professor Margo A. Bagley University of Virginia School of Law That Was Then... Belief that decisions
More informationRecent Changes to the Patent Litigation Landscape and Predictions for the Future. June 12, 2018
Recent Changes to the Patent Litigation Landscape and Predictions for the Future June 12, 2018 Rob Reckers Fiona Bell 2 Trends in Patent Litigation: Cases Filed 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000
More informationW.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al Doc. 123
W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al Doc. 123 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Norfolk Division W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES, INC., and GORE ENTERPRISE HOLDINGS,
More informationTHE AMERICA INVENTS ACT NEW POST-ISSUANCE PATENT OFFICE PROCEEDINGS
THE AMERICA INVENTS ACT NEW POST-ISSUANCE PATENT OFFICE PROCEEDINGS By Sharon Israel and Kyle Friesen I. Introduction The recently enacted Leahy-Smith America Invents Act ( AIA ) 1 marks the most sweeping
More informationINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LITIGATION
In a business climate driven by constant innovation and commodified information, protecting intellectual property is critical to success. Clients ranging from emerging visionaries to market-leading corporations
More informationInvalidity Challenges After KSR and Bilski
Invalidity Challenges After KSR and Bilski February 24, 2010 Presenters Steve Tiller and Greg Stone Whiteford, Taylor & Preston, LLP 7 St. Paul Street Baltimore, Maryland 21202-1636 (410) 347-8700 stiller@wtplaw.com
More informationIssues and Possible Reforms in the U.S. Patent System
Issues and Possible Reforms in the U.S. Patent System Bronwyn H. Hall Professor in the Graduate School University of California at Berkeley Overview Economics of patents and innovations Changes to US patent
More informationEffective Utilization of Patent Searches in the Wake of the AIA Patent Reform Law. April 30, 2012
Effective Utilization of Patent Searches in the Wake of the AIA Patent Reform Law April 30, 2012 Panel Members Moderator: Robb Evans, Business Process Management & Strategy, Global Patent Solutions LLC
More informationLarry R. Laycock. Education. Practice Focus. Attorney at Law Shareholder
Larry R. Laycock Attorney at Law Shareholder Larry has extensive experience as lead trial counsel in complex and intellectual property litigation. His practice includes patent, trademark, trade secret,
More informationPatent Assertion Entity Activity: An FTC Study
Patent Assertion Entity Activity: An FTC Study Suzanne Munck Deputy Director, OPP Chief Counsel for IP U.S. Federal Trade Commission Daniel Hosken Deputy Assistant Director Bureau of Economics U.S. Federal
More informationBrian J. Love Assistant Professor of Law, Santa Clara
Patent Assertion Entities Brian J. Love Assistant Professor of Law, Santa Clara University blove@scu.edu @BrianJLove California Assembly Select Committee on High Technology: Informational Hearing on Patent
More informationCall in toll free at and use 7-Digit Access Code
Managing Litigation for In-House Counsel Breakfast Discussion Group Predictive Coding for E-Discovery: Using Computer Intelligence to Facilitate Document Production Steven Schoenfeld, Esq. May 15, 2012
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION NETWORK-1 SECURITY SOLUTIONS, INC., a Delaware corporation, vs. Plaintiff, Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc., a Delaware corporation;
More informationCase 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 12/16/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 1:16-cv-01240-UNA Document 1 Filed 12/16/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE PALTALK HOLDINGS, INC., Plaintiff, v. RIOT GAMES, INC.,, Defendant.
More informationRocco E. Testani, Partner
, Partner 999 Peachtree Street, NE Suite 2300 Atlanta, GA 30309-3996 Office: 404.853.8390 rocco.testani@sutherland.com Rocco Testani represents clients in litigation ranging from complex business disputes
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 3:14-cv-1877
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION LAKESOUTH HOLDINGS, LLC, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 3:14-cv-1877 v. Demand for Jury Trial WAL-MART STORES, INC. and
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit EVOLUTIONARY INTELLIGENCE LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION, SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS
More informationPatent Assertion Entity Activity: An FTC Study
Patent Assertion Entity Activity: An FTC Study Suzanne Munck Chief Counsel for Intellectual Property Deputy Director, Office of Policy Planning U.S. Federal Trade Commission PLI 11th Annual Patent Law
More informationJudicial System in Japan (IP-related case)
Session1: Basics of IP rights International Workshop on Intellectual Property, Commercial and Emerging Laws 24 Feb. 2017 Judicial System in Japan (IP-related case) Akira KATASE Judge, IP High Court of
More informationFTC Panel on Markets for IP and technology
FTC Panel on Markets for IP and technology Bronwyn H. Hall UC Berkeley 4 May 2009 Topics Non-practicing entities Independent invention/prior user rights Data needs May 2009 FTC Hearings - Berkeley 2 1
More informationP&G invests over $2.2 billion dollars per year in Research & Development. We employ over 8900 scientists in 29 research centers in 13 countries.
Statement of Steven W. Miller Vice President and General Counsel for Intellectual Property for The Procter & Gamble Company Before the Subcommittee on Intellectual Property, Competition, and the Internet
More informationCharles S. Barquist SENIOR COUNSEL EDUCATION BAR ADMISSIONS CLERKSHIPS PRACTICES
Charles S. Barquist SENIOR COUNSEL 707 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD LOS ANGELES, CA 90017-3543 (213) 892-5400 CBARQUIST@MOFO.COM EDUCATION UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN (A.B., 1975) HARVARD LAW SCHOOL (J.D., 1978) BAR
More informationR. Cameron Garrison. Managing Partner
R. Cameron Garrison Managing Partner cgarrison@lathropgage.com KANSAS CITY 2345 Grand Blvd. Suite 2200 Kansas City, MO 64108 T: 816.460.5566 F: 816.292.2001 Assistant Debbie Adams 816.460.5346 PRACTICE
More informationGoogle reveal. their secret to a successful IP Litigation strategy. Catherine Lacavera, Director of IP and Litgation, Google
Google reveal their secret to a successful IP Litigation strategy Catherine Lacavera, Director of IP and Litgation, Google Catherine Lacavera is the Director of IP and Litigation at Google. Named one of
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Civil Action No. v. ) ) AMAZON.COM, INC., a/k/a ) AMAZON.COM AUCTIONS, INC. ) ) Defend ant.
More informationHow To Draft Patents For Future Portfolio Growth
For the latest breaking news and analysis on intellectual property legal issues, visit Law today. www.law.com/ip Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law.com Phone: +1 646
More informationKey Strategies for Your IP Portfolio
Key Strategies for Your IP Portfolio Jeremiah B. Frueauf, Partner Where s the value?! Human capital! Physical assets! Contracts, Licenses, Relationships! Intellectual Property Patents o Utility, Design
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT. Nature of Action
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ABBOTT DIABETES CARE INC., Plaintiff, v. DEXCOM, INC., Defendant. C.A. No. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT Plaintiff Abbott Diabetes Care
More informationApril 1, Patent Application Pitfall: Federal Circuit Affirms Invalidity of Software Patent for Inadequate Disclosure
April 1, 2008 Client Alert Patent Application Pitfall: Federal Circuit Affirms Invalidity of Software Patent for Inadequate Disclosure by James G. Gatto On March 28, 2008, the Federal Circuit affirmed
More informationCase 1:11-cv JSR Document 33 Filed 01/20/12 Page 1 of 9
Case 111-cv-07566-JSR Document 33 Filed 01/20/12 Page 1 of 9 Gary P. Naftalis Michael S. Oberman KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP 1177 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10036 (212) 715-9100
More informationRyan N. Phelan. Tel
Ryan N. Phelan Partner Tel 312.474.6607 rphelan@marshallip.com Ryan N. Phelan is a registered patent attorney who counsels and works with clients in intellectual property (IP) matters, with a focus on
More informationEssay No. 1 ~ WHAT CAN YOU DO WITH A NEW IDEA? Discovery, invention, creation: what do these terms mean, and what does it mean to invent something?
Essay No. 1 ~ WHAT CAN YOU DO WITH A NEW IDEA? Discovery, invention, creation: what do these terms mean, and what does it mean to invent something? Introduction This article 1 explores the nature of ideas
More informationThe Need To Reform The US Patent System. A Story of Unfair Invalidation for Patents Under Alice 101
The Need To Reform The US Patent System A Story of Unfair Invalidation for Patents Under Alice 101 Act Ted Tsao, is a technology expert and has been an engineer and innovator since 1987. He is the founder
More informationProtect Your Innovation and Maximize Your Investment Return in Automotive Electronics
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP Protect Your Innovation and Maximize Your Investment Return in Automotive Electronics Presented by Shaobin Zhu SEMICON (Shanghai) March 20, 2013 SEMICON
More informationWAKE FOREST JOURNAL OF BUSINESS
WAKE FOREST JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW! VOLUME!13! SUMMER!2013! NUMBER!3! IMPACT OF THE AMERICA INVENTS ACT Justin Nifong I. SCOPE OF PRACTIONER S NOTE... 340! II. AMERICA INVENTS
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION RADIO TOWER NETWORKS, LLC, Plaintiff, Case No: vs. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ONCOR ELECTRIC DELIVERY COMPANY, LLC, Defendant.
More informationWILLENKEN AT A GLANCE
WWW.WILLENKEN.COM WILLENKEN AT A GLANCE Founded in 2002, Willenken Wilson Loh & Delgado LLP is a preeminent trial firm based in Los Angeles, California. Our lawyers, who have collectively tried nearly
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE INTELLECTUAL VENTURES II LLC, Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED CANON INC. and CANON U.S.A., INC., Defendants. COMPLAINT
More informationMcRO Syncs Automation Software With Patent Eligibility
Portfolio Media. Inc. 111 West 19 th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10011 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com McRO Syncs Automation Software With Patent
More informationCase 1:14-cv AJS Document 1 Filed 08/21/14 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 1:14-cv-00220-AJS Document 1 Filed 08/21/14 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA INTELLECTUAL VENTURES I LLC and INTELLECTUAL VENTURES II LLC v.
More informationCS 4984 Software Patents
CS 4984 Software Patents Ross Dannenberg Rdannenberg@bannerwitcoff.com (202) 824-3153 Patents I 1 How do you protect software? Copyrights Patents Trademarks Trade Secrets Contract Technology (encryption)
More information11th Annual Patent Law Institute
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY Course Handbook Series Number G-1316 11th Annual Patent Law Institute Co-Chairs Scott M. Alter Douglas R. Nemec John M. White To order this book, call (800) 260-4PLI or fax us at
More informationManaging the Patent Thicket
Managing the Patent Thicket Robert S. Blasi, Esq. Partner Goodwin Procter LLP About Goodwin Procter Global law firm Most of our attorneys in Boston, California, and NYC. Large technology companies practice
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit No. 14-1356 Selective Insurance Company of America, a New Jersey corporation lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Smart Candle, LLC, a Minnesota
More informationRaising the Stakes in Patent Cases
Raising the Stakes in Patent Cases Anup Malani Jonathan Masur IPSC 2012 Two Baseline Patent System Objectives Reward inventors of valuable inventions in proportion to the social value of the invention
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION RADIO TOWER NETWORKS, LLC, Plaintiff, Case No: vs. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED CROSSPOINT COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Defendant.
More informationKirstin L. Stoll-DeBell
Kirstin L. Stoll-DeBell Partner Denver 1801 California St. Suite 3300 Denver, Colorado 80202 kstoll@merchantgould.com D 303.357.1640 When working on a case, Kirstin strives to balance her client's business
More informationJohn D. Denkenberger Co-Managing Member Chair of Litigation Group
John D. Denkenberger Co-Managing Member Chair of Litigation Group john.denkenberger@cojk.com direct: 206.695.1749 Professional Overview John Denkenberger is a co-managing member of COJK, serves on the
More informationIP Outlook in the Reform Era
1 IP Outlook in the Reform Era May 8, 2009 Attorney Advertising Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome Models used are not clients but may be representative of clients 321 N. Clark Street, Suite
More informationElena R. Baca. Los Angeles. Orange County. Practice Areas. Admissions. Languages. Education
Elena R. Baca Partner, Employment Law Department elenabaca@paulhastings.com Elena Baca is chair of Paul Hastings Los Angeles office and co-vice chair of the Employment Law practice. Ms. Baca is recognized
More informationCase 1:16-cv JMS-DML Document 1 Filed 02/05/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1
Case 1:16-cv-00308-JMS-DML Document 1 Filed 02/05/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, ) ) Plaintiff,
More informationIP Attorneys Dominate At Fish & Richardson
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, Floor 6 New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@portfoliomedia.com IP Attorneys Dominate At Fish & Richardson By
More informationAlternatives to Ex Ante Disclosure
Alternatives to Ex Ante Disclosure Presented by Michael A. Lindsay Partner, DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP ANSI Legal Issues Forum: Patented Technology in Standards October 13, 2011 1 Overview Policy for ex ante
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Reed et al v. Freebird Film Productions, Inc. et al Doc. 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION REED, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. FREEBIRD FILM PRODUCTIONS,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION GRAFTECH INTERNATIONAL ) HOLDINGS INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Civil Action No. ) RESEARCH IN MOTION, LTD. and )
More informationCase 5:07-cv D Document 1 Filed 06/06/07 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Case 5:07-cv-00650-D Document 1 Filed 06/06/07 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA 1) RONALD A. KATZ TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, L.P., Plaintiff, v. Case No.
More informationAaron T. Olejniczak is a registered patent attorney and partner at Andrus Intellectual Property Law.
Milwaukee Office p 414.271.7590 e aarono@andruslaw.com Aaron T. Olejniczak is a registered patent attorney and partner at Andrus Intellectual Property Law. Aaron handles a wide variety of intellectual
More informationCase: Document: 60-1 Page: 1 04/05/ UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. August Term, 2012
Case: 12-3393 Document: 60-1 Page: 1 04/05/2013 897956 9 12-3393 Mercer v. Gupta UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2012 (Argued: January 8, 2013 Decided: April 5, 2013)
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION VS. CIVIL ACTION NO. H Defendants.
Halliburton Energy Services Inc et al v. NL Industries Inc et al Doc. 405 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, INC., et al.,
More informationGetting the Most From Your IP Budget: Strategies for IP Portfolio Management and Litigation Avoidance
Getting the Most From Your IP Budget: Strategies for IP Portfolio Management and Litigation Avoidance March 19, 2009 A Web conference hosted by Foley & Lardner LLP Welcome Moderator Andrew Rawlins, Partner,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA I. INTRODUCTION
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 FREE STREAM MEDIA CORP., v. Plaintiff, ALPHONSO INC., et al., Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA I. INTRODUCTION Case No. 1-cv-0-RS ORDER DENYING
More informationNew Emphasis on the Analytical Approach of Apportionment In Determination of a Reasonable Royalty
New Emphasis on the Analytical Approach of Apportionment In Determination of a Reasonable Royalty James E. Malackowski, Justin Lewis and Robert Mazur 1 Recent court decisions have raised the bar with respect
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Exhibit Z 0 0 Tyler J. Woods, Bar No. twoods@trialnewport.com NEWPORT TRIAL GROUP 00 Newport Place, Suite 00 Newport Beach, CA 0 Tel: () 0- Fax: () 0- Attorneys for Defendant and Counter-Claimant SHIPPING
More informationJASON HUSGEN. St. Louis, MO office:
JASON HUSGEN Senior Counsel St. Louis, MO office: 314.480.1921 email: jason.husgen@ Overview Clever, thorough, and with a keen knowledge of the law, Jason tackles complex commercial disputes as part of
More informationBuilding a Sophisticated Litigation Practice Outside the Big Firm
New York State Bar Association Law Practice Management Committee on Continuing Legal Education Program Starting Your Own Practice in New York Going Solo in the Real World Building a Sophisticated Litigation
More informationCould a Patent Term Reduction Solve the Software Patent Problem? Brian J.
Could a Patent Term Reduction Solve the Software Patent Problem? Brian J. Love blove@scu.edu @BrianJLove Software Patents and Trolls Not two separate problems Rather, two factors exacerbating one fundamental
More informationPatent Damages. Presented by Ryan Ford. University of Nevada
The Economics of Patent Damages Presented by Ryan Ford University of Nevada October 8, 2013 - Offices in Emeryville, CA and Pasadena, CA. - Economic consulting services: Antitrust/Competition t/c titi
More informationWelcome. Recent Developments in Intellectual Property Law. December 13, 2012
Welcome Recent Developments in Intellectual Property Law December 13, 2012 Husch Blackwell LLP Leading Intellectual Property Cases of 2012 and Effects on Litigation Strategy By: Nathan Oleen Husch Blackwell
More informationOther than the "trade secret," the
Why Most Patents Are Invalid THOMAS W. COLE 1 Other than the "trade secret," the patent is the only way for a corporation or independent inventor to protect his invention from being stolen by others. Yet,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION AZURE NETWORKS, LLC and TRI-COUNTY EXCELSIOR FOUNDATION, v. Plaintiffs, TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC., FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR,
More informationFrom the Experts: Ten Tips to Save Costs in Patent Litigation
The Business Implications of High Stakes Litigation: Process, Players, and Consequences From the Experts: Ten Tips to Save Costs in Patent Litigation By Joseph Drayton Reprinted with Permission About the
More informationFrank A. Angileri Shareholder, Co-Chair Post-Grant Proceedings Michigan Office P (248)
Frank Angileri Brooks Kushman Frank A. Angileri Shareholder, Co-Chair Post-Grant Proceedings Michigan Office P (248) 226-2829 fangileri@brookskushman.com Frank`s practice focuses on intellectual property
More informationDoes the US Patent System Need a Patent Small Claims Proceeding?
Santa Clara Law Santa Clara Law Digital Commons Faculty Publications Faculty Scholarship 3-1-2013 Does the US Patent System Need a Patent Small Claims Proceeding? Colleen Chien Santa Clara University School
More informationPlease find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
UNITED STA TES p A TENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patent and Trademark Office Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
More informationCase 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/27/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1
Case 4:16-cv-00746 Document 1 Filed 09/27/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION Neal Technologies, Inc. d/b/a Bullet Proof Diesel
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. United States District Court
Case :0-cv-00-MHP Document Filed 0//00 Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 AMERICAN SMALL BUSINESS LEAGUE, v. Plaintiff, UNITED STATES SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION,
More informationFederal Trade Commission. In the Matter of Google Inc., FTC File No February 8, 2013 Chicago, Illinois
Federal Trade Commission In the Matter of Google Inc., FTC File No. 121-0120 February 8, 2013 Chicago, Illinois 1 In a land not too far away and a time not too long ago Motorola, Libertyville, Illinois,
More informationKarlinsky LLC 570 Lexington Avenue, Suite 1600 New York, NY Tel / Fax
Counsel Karlinsky LLC 570 Lexington Avenue, Suite 1600 New York, NY 10022 Tel 646.380.0036 / 203.570.2310 Fax 646.380.0039 george.hritz@karlinskyllc.com George Hritz resolves disputes. Practicing in New
More informationWhy patents DO matter to YOUR business
Why patents DO matter to YOUR business Dr Simone Mitchell & Alexandra Chubb DLA Piper 19 March 2015 Overview This session will cover: how to identify when patent protection should be obtained to protect
More informationRichard M. Zielinski. Director. Accolades. Boston:
Richard M. Zielinski Director rzielinski@goulstonstorrs.com Boston: +1 617 574 4029 Richard Zielinski is a nationally known bet the company trial lawyer who handles a wide range of complex, high-stakes
More informationTiffany D. Gehrke. Associate. Tel
Tiffany D. Gehrke Associate Tel 312.474.6656 tgehrke@marshallip.com Tiffany D. Gehrke secures and protects intellectual property rights for a broad range of clients. In this role, her prior experience
More informationWinning a Game of Inches: Gaining Momentum Through IP Tuesday, October 5, 2010 Westin Times Square, New York, NY
Winning a Game of Inches: Gaining Momentum Through IP Tuesday, October 5, 2010 Westin Times Square, New York, NY 8:15 a.m. Registration and Continental Breakfast 9:00 a.m. 9:15 a.m. Welcome/Opening Remarks
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Nos."15)2164"&"15)2256" IRA"HOLTZMAN,"individually"and"as"representative"of"a"class," Plaintiff(Appellee,-Cross(Appellant," GREGORY"P."TURZA,"
More informationKilling One Bird with Two Stones: Pharmaceutical Patents in the Wake of Pfizer v Apotex and KSR v Teleflex
Killing One Bird with Two Stones: Pharmaceutical Patents in the Wake of Pfizer v Apotex and KSR v Teleflex Janis K. Fraser, Ph.D., J.D. June 5, 2007 The pre-apocalypse obviousness world Pfizer v. Apotex
More informationPatent Trolls: Myths & Realities.
Patent Trolls: Myths & Realities For Presentation at the TILEC Tilburg Law and Economics Center Conference on Patent Reforms Thursday 26 and Friday 27 March 2009 NH Grand Hotel Krasnapolsky, Amsterdam
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION ZAVALA LICENSING LLC, Plaintiff, Case No: vs. PATENT CASE KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendant.
More informationelearning Patents: An institutional perspective
elearning Patents: An institutional perspective Jim Farmer As presented at the SUNY Wizard Conference November 8, 2006 East Syracuse, New York, USA Warning This is a literature survey, not legal advice.
More informationMargaret Dale is a versatile first-chair litigator and handles complex business disputes for clients across a wide variety of industries.
Contact Margaret A. Dale Partner New York +1.212.969.3315 mdale@proskauer.com Margaret Dale is a versatile first-chair litigator and handles complex business disputes for clients across a wide variety
More information'Ordinary' Skill In The Art After KSR
Portfolio Media, Inc. 648 Broadway, Suite 200 New York, NY 10012 www.law360.com Phone: +1 212 537 6331 Fax: +1 212 537 6371 customerservice@portfoliomedia.com 'Ordinary' Skill In The Art After KSR Law360,
More informationThomas L. Duston. Tel
Thomas L. Duston Partner Tel 312.423.3446 tduston@marshallip.com Tom Duston is a hands-on trial lawyer who focuses on patent litigation for some of the world's most sophisticated companies. With nearly
More informationDori K. Stibolt Partner
Dori K. Stibolt Partner West Palm Beach, FL Tel: 561.804.4417 Fax: 561.835.9602 dstibolt@foxrothschild.com Dori is a skilled litigator whose practice centers on labor and employment claims, trust and estate
More informationStandard-Essential Patents
Standard-Essential Patents Richard Gilbert University of California, Berkeley Symposium on Management of Intellectual Property in Standard-Setting Processes October 3-4, 2012 Washington, D.C. The Smartphone
More informationi.e. v. e.g. Rule 1 during arguments: If you re losing, start correcting their grammar. - Author Unknown
BIOTECH BUZZ Biotech Patent Education Subcommittee April 2015 Contributor: Jennifer A. Fleischer i.e. v. e.g. Rule 1 during arguments: If you re losing, start correcting their grammar. - Author Unknown
More information