MICHIGAN MARSH BIRD SURVEY PROTOCOL

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "MICHIGAN MARSH BIRD SURVEY PROTOCOL"

Transcription

1 MICHIGAN MARSH BIRD SURVEY PROTOCOL For More Information Contact: Michael J. Monfils Michigan Natural Features Inventory Michigan State University Extension P.O. Box Lansing, MI March 11, 2010

2 Copyright 2010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees. Michigan State University Extension programs and materials are open to all without regard to race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, marital status, or family status. Cover photograph credits: upper left King Rail, Michael Sanders; upper right Saginaw Bay coastal wetland, Michael Monfils; lower left observer conducting marsh bird survey, Michael Sanders; and lower right Black Tern incubating nest, Michael Monfils.

3 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...1 METHODS...1 Site Selection...1 Timing of Surveys...2 Suitable Weather Conditions...3 Target Species...3 Field Survey Protocol...4 FILLING OUT FORMS...5 Bird Data...5 Habitat Information...8 Volunteer Effort...9 EQUIPMENT...9 Equipment Provided to Observers...9 Other Recommended Equipment...10 END OF SEASON TASKS...10 ADDITIONAL RESOURCES...10 THANK YOU...11 Marsh Bird Survey Forms...Appendix A Example Bird and Habitat Data Forms... Appendix B

4

5 INTRODUCTION The amount of emergent wetland habitat in North America has decreased sharply during the past century and consequently populations of many marsh-dependent birds such as rails, bitterns, and grebes appear to be declining. Some species, including King Rail, Yellow Rail, American Bittern and others, are of particular concern and have received special status through various federal and state agencies. Many marsh birds consume a variety of aquatic invertebrates and may be susceptible to environmental contaminants. Their habitats are also vulnerable to invasions by non-native species (e.g., common reed [Phragmites australis], reed canary grass [Phalaris arundinacea]). Hence, marsh birds can serve as indicator species for assessing wetland ecosystem quality and evaluating the success of wetland conservation activities. Due to the secretive nature, low detectability, and difficult-to-access habitats of many marsh bird species, we lack adequate data from existing monitoring programs to determine their status and estimate population trends. Better monitoring data are needed to improve conservation planning and to assess the success of conservation actions (e.g., restoration, management). Numerous agencies and organizations have cooperated over the past decade to fill this data gap in an effort to inform conservation decision-making and management for these species. In 2009, members of the Michigan Bird Conservation Initiative (MiBCI) began working with other State, regional, and National partners to develop a marsh bird survey in Michigan. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) provided funding for a three-year effort to implement the National Marsh Bird Monitoring Program in Michigan beginning in Our goals are to 1) evaluate population trends for marsh bird species, 2) improve our understanding of marsh bird distribution and abundance, and 3) inform conservation decision-making at multiple geographic scales. Michigan s survey will provide data for an ongoing National pilot program that includes similar efforts in Wisconsin, Idaho, Kentucky, New York, and Florida. This pilot program is providing an opportunity to evaluate the sample design and methods of the National program, before it is expanded to a nationwide survey. We plan to continue this survey annually to allow long-term monitoring of marsh birds at the State, regional, and national levels. METHODS Site Selection Survey points were randomly selected within wetlands using a national framework developed by the USFWS that incorporates National Wetlands Inventory and other land cover data. Sites known to support certain species or wetland types deemed to most likely harbor priority marsh birds were not specifically targeted. While fewer marsh birds may be detected and fewer points surveyed using this randomized framework, these data will most accurately reflect the true status and trends of Michigan s marsh bird populations. Points occur in clusters of approximately 5-10 points, which is roughly the number of points that can be surveyed in a single outing using this protocol. Adjacent survey points will be no closer than 400 m and some may be over a kilometer from their nearest neighbor. Most points can be surveyed on foot, but some will require boat or canoe access. Surveys will be conducted on both public and private lands, and the survey coordinator will assist volunteers in obtaining landowner 1

6 permission. Do not conduct surveys on private lands without confirmation from the survey coordinator that the landowner has provided written permission. We will provide surveyors GPS coordinates, maps, and aerial photos to assist them in locating their survey points. We highly recommended that all surveyors visit their survey points prior to actually conducting surveys. You may find it helpful to mark your survey points with flagging tape prior to conducting the surveys. Each observer will survey approximately 5-10 predetermined wetland points separated by at least 400 meters. Timing of Surveys Time of Year: Peak marsh bird calling activity occurs during the courtship and egg-laying period in spring and early summer, so we will conduct all surveys in May and June. The survey window will differ slightly for northern versus southern Michigan (Figure 1). In southern Michigan, surveys will be conducted between May 1 and June 15, while northern Michigan surveys will be done between May 15 and June 30. Ideally, a complete round of annual surveys will consist of 3 visits to each point. Research suggests that at least 3 surveys are needed to confirm the presence/absence of some species with 90% certainty. However, if an observer can only conduct 2 surveys in a season, this is acceptable and the data will still have value. Volunteers will conduct a survey during each of 3 survey windows that vary slightly depending on geographic location within the State. In southern Michigan (Figure 1), surveys should be completed during the following periods: May 1-14, May 15-31, and June Northern Michigan surveys will begin later and should be conducted during these 3 periods: May 15-31, June 1-14, and June Follow these guidelines as closely possible, but if you must modify the schedule slightly, doing so is better than not conducting a survey at all. Conduct 1 survey during each of 3 survey periods (3 surveys total at each point). Southern Michigan Periods: May 1-14, May 15-31, and June Northern Michigan Periods: May 15-31, June 1-14, and June Time of Day: Surveys may be done in either the morning or evening; however, once a time period is selected for a site (cluster of points), the time period cannot be changed. Marsh birds are typically most vocal in the 2 hours surrounding sunrise and sunset. Morning surveys begin 30 minutes before sunrise (at first light) and should be completed by 3 hours after sunrise (e.g., hr if sunrise at 0530 hr). Evening surveys begin 2 hours before sunset and must be completed by 30 min after sunset (i.e., by dark remember your headlamp or flashlight). Observers conducting field work in the evening should start their survey at a time that has them finishing the last point when it is becoming too dark to see their data form. You can look up local sunrise/sunset times at Conduct each survey in the morning between 30 minutes before to 3 hours after sunrise OR in the evening between 2 hours before to 30 minutes after sunset. 2

7 Suitable Weather Conditions Surveys should not be conducted when wind speed is >20 km/hr (12 mph) or during periods of sustained rain or heavy fog. Participants should postpone surveys if they believe conditions are affecting bird calling activity or their ability to detect marsh birds. If wind speed increases above 20 km/hr or sustained rain begins during the survey, participants should stop the survey and repeat the entire survey route another day (i.e., do not just go back and survey the remaining points on the route). These constraints will require that you be flexible with your survey schedule and watch weather forecasts closely. NORTH-SOUTH BOUNDARY Conduct surveys only when winds are less than 20 km/hr (12 mph) and there is no steady rain or heavy fog. Figure 1. Map showing the boundary used to separate southern and northern Michigan marsh bird surveys. The survey dates and species included in broadcasts differ slightly between the two regions. Target Species Only the primary and secondary species listed below should be recorded on data sheets (Table 1). While it may be tempting to record all species heard at a given survey point, doing so may cause you to overlook target species, which will negatively affect survey results. Many other species you will encounter (e.g., Red-winged Blackbird) are adequately monitored by existing surveys. Please do not spend your time counting non-target species. Table 1. Primary and secondary species to be documented during Michigan marsh bird surveys. Four-letter codes that can be used in data forms are provided, and an * indicates species for which broadcasts will be played. Primary species Code Secondary species Code Yellow Rail* YERA Black Tern BLTE Sora* SORA Forster s Tern FOTE Virginia Rail* VIRA Marsh Wren MAWR King Rail* KIRA Sedge Wren SEWR Least Bittern* LEBI Swamp Sparrow SWSP American Bittern* AMBI Le Conte s Sparrow LCSP American Coot AMCO Yellow-headed Blackbird YHBL Common Moorhen COMO Sandhill Crane SACR Pied-billed Grebe PBGR Wilson s Snipe WISN Record only primary and secondary target species on your data sheets. Do not spend time counting other species. 3

8 Field Survey Protocol Each survey lasts for 10 min and consists of two parts: an initial 5-min passive listening period, and a subsequent 5-min broadcast period consisting of 5 1-min segments of calls for secretive species. One-min broadcast segments consist of 30 sec of pre-recorded vocalizations and 30 sec of silence. In southern Michigan, the broadcast sequence consists of calls of Least Bittern, Sora, Virginia Rail, King Rail, and American Bittern, while in northern Michigan we will broadcast calls of Least Bittern, Yellow Rail, Sora, Virginia Rail, and American Bittern. Calls are broadcasted using an MP3 player and portable speaker set. It is important that you DO NOT use other equipment for broadcasts, no matter how much louder other systems may be, as this will affect standardization of the survey. Additionally, you should only use the provided call sequences and not play other audio files. We are using equipment and audio files that achieve the required sound pressure of db at 1 m from the speaker when broadcasted, so altering the equipment/audio files may prevent broadcasts from meeting this requirement. The broadcast player should be placed upright on the ground or on the bow of the boat. If the ground is wet or inundated, you should place the speaker on an object as close to the ground as possible (e.g., float cushion, muskrat house). Point the speaker toward the center of the wetland and DO NOT change its position during the survey. Speakers should be pointed in the same direction for all replicate surveys. In situations where the center of the wetland is not obvious, observers should record the general compass direction (e.g., N, NW, WSW, etc.) in which they pointed the speaker and use the same orientation in subsequent surveys. Observers should stand 2 m to one side of the speaker, because standing closer could reduce your ability to hear marsh birds. All surveys should be conducted by a single observer. If more than one individual is present, only the primary observer should collect data. Additional observers wishing to conduct simultaneous surveys should record data on separate data sheets as if conducting entirely independent surveys. All surveys are unlimited-radius point counts in which all target species detected at a survey point are recorded regardless of their distance from the point. All surveys are single-observer, unlimited-radius point counts. Each point is surveyed for 10 min consisting of a 5-min passive listening period followed by 1-min call broadcast segments for 5 target species. Place the broadcast speakers on or near the ground and point toward the center of the wetland. Primary Species: Each individual bird detected of a primary species will be entered on a separate line of the data form. Observers should record every 1-min segment during which the individual is detected (i.e., during any of the 1-min passive or call-broadcast segments). Do not record the number of times a bird responded during each segment; simply record if the individual was detected during each 1-min segment. These data are important in determining whether broadcasts are effective at eliciting additional responses and if broadcasts should be used in future surveys. By recording whether an individual responds during each 1-min segment, we can also estimate detection probabilities for primary species using capture-recapture models. Estimates of detection probability are essential to determining how well the survey data measure population sizes/trends. Observers must decide whether each vocalization heard at a survey point is a new individual for that point or an individual that was observed previously. Some points could have so many marsh birds calling that observers find it impossible to record each 1- min segment during which every individual bird is detected. For example, an observer may 4

9 see/hear >20 American Coots at one survey point. In these situations, simply write down an estimate of the total number of individuals detected for that species during the entire survey on one line of the data sheet (e.g., write 23 AMCO on one line). Every individual of a primary species is recorded on one line of the data form (i.e., one individual bird per row). If a species is too abundant to track individuals separately, then writing the total number observed during the survey is acceptable. Observers need to estimate the distance from the survey point to each individual of a primary species to the nearest 5 m. Estimate the distance when a bird is first detected, because it may move closer after hearing broadcasted calls. Recording the distance to each individual will allow us to use distance sampling to better estimate bird densities. Estimating the distance to birds can be difficult, especially when they are only heard. We encourage you to practice estimating distances using objects of known distance or with the assistance of rangefinders and GPS units. You can also hang flagging at known distances (e.g., 25 m, 50 m) near your survey points. Estimate the distance to each individual of a primary species to the nearest 5 m when the bird is FIRST observed. Secondary Species: All observations of a secondary species at a point should be combined into one row of the data form. You only need to record the total number observed in each of three distance categories ( 50 m, > m, and >100 m), which is based on the distance when each bird is FIRST detected. Unlike primary species, you DO NOT need to mark every minute that a secondary species is detected, but we ask you to mark the FIRST (and ONLY the first) 1-min segment in which you detect that species. You do not need to track individuals of secondary species separately. Include all individuals together on one row of the data form and record the total number of birds observed within three distance categories: 50 m, > m, and >100 m. Surveyors DO NOT need to record detections during all 1-min segments, but should note the 1- min segment in which you FIRST detect the secondary species. FILLING OUT FORMS You can download the forms used for this survey via the Michigan Marsh Bird Survey webpage ( for later printing, or you can obtain a supply of forms by contacting the survey coordinator. We also provided copies of blank forms in Appendix A. Bird Data Below are details on how to fill out each part of the bird survey form. Note that we provided codes and descriptions for several data fields at the bottom of the data sheet to help you complete the form without the need to reference these instructions. We also supplied a completed form in Appendix B as an example of how data sheets should be filled out. Date: Indicate the date of the survey. Use separate data sheets for different dates. 5

10 Site # and Name: Write the number and name assigned by the survey coordinator for your survey site. This information will be provided with your maps and other materials. Survey #: Circle the appropriate survey period (first, second, or third) for the season. Observer: Provide the name of the individual conducting the survey. Point #: List the survey point number as assigned by the survey coordinator (e.g., X-0043). Start Time: Please record the start time at each point using military time (e.g., 5:00 AM = 0500 hr; 5:00 PM = 1700 hr). Temperature: Use a thermometer to determine the temperature (in F) at each survey point. Cloud (%): Estimate % of the sky covered by clouds (0% = clear, 100% = overcast). Precipitation: Using the codes on the data form, record the precipitation level as none, light rain, rain, heavy rain, light snow, snow, heavy snow, or fog. Remember that surveys should not be conducted during periods of steady precipitation or heavy fog. Wind Speed: Categorize wind speed using the Beaufort scale (Table 2). Table 2. Beaufort scale description for use when ranking the wind speed at each point. Beaufort Wind Speed Number Wind Speed Indicators mph km/hr 0 Smoke rises vertically <1 <2 1 Wind direction shown by smoke drift Wind felt on face; leaves rustle Leaves & small twigs in constant motion; light flag extended Raises dust and loose paper; small branches are moved Small trees with leaves sway; crested wavelets on inland waters Noise: Rank the background noise at each point using the following codes: 0 = no background noise during all or most of the survey; 1 = faint background noise during at least half of the survey; 2 = moderate background noise (probably cannot hear some birds beyond 100 m during >30 sec of the survey); 3 = loud background noise (probably cannot hear some birds beyond 50 m during >30 sec of the survey); and 4 = intense background noise (probably cannot hear some birds beyond 25 m during >30 sec of the survey). Species: Record the full name of the species or the four-letter code provided in Table 1. Responded During: Put a 1 in each column (i.e., 1-min segment) in which that individual is detected by vocalization and put an S in each column in which the individual is seen (including flyovers). If the individual is both heard and seen, put a 1S in that column. For example, if a single Virginia Rail calls during minute 2 and then again in response to broadcasts during minute 9, then in the row used for that individual a 1 should be recorded in the columns 1-2 MIN and VIRA. If a new individual of the same or different species is also detected, record that 6

11 observation on a separate row. If you observe a primary species before or after the 10-min survey period, or while walking between points, please record that observation in the Outside Survey column (with a 1 or S ) and add any pertinant notes in the comments section. Call Types: For primary species, record the call type(s) you heard. This information can help us learn more about breeding chronology, observer bias, and detection probability. To make recording this information easier, we provided numerical codes to the most common call types on the data forms. If you hear a call different from those on the form, describe it in the comments sections. Brief descriptions of the common calls and their possible functions are provided below. American Bittern: pump-er-lunk (mate attraction, territorial), chu-peep (given during copulation ceremony), kok-kok-kok (given when flushed) American Coot: burr-up (perturbation), hic-up (perturbation), honk (social interactions) Common Moorhen: wipeout (territorial/advertising), keep (communication between pairs), giddy-up (territorial/advertising) King Rail: clatter (mate communication), kek-kek-kek (mate attraction), kek-hurrah (grunt, territorial), kek-burr (territorial), squawk (alarm) Least Bittern: coo-coo (mate attraction), kak-kak-kak (mate communication, when feeding young, alarm), ank or ert (given when flushed, alarm) Pied-billed Grebe: owhoop (courtship, pair communication territorial), hyena (greeting) Sora: whinny (territorial, mate communication), per-weep (mate attraction), keep (alarm) Virginia Rail: grunt (mate communication), tick-it (mate attraction), kicker (solicitation), squawk (sharp call, territorial dispute, alarm call) Wilson s Snipe: tuk-tuk-tuk (harsh call usually given from ground), winnowing hu-hu-hu (hollow sound given during flight display), rasping scaipe (given when flushed) Yellow Rail: click-click (primary call, mate attraction), descending cackle (pair maintenance), wheeze (hostility) Distance: For primary species, estimate the distance to the bird when it was FIRST detected (round to the nearest 5 m). If the bird is located more than 200 meters from the survey point, simply write >200 in this column. Distance Aide: Use the codes on the data form to record any aides you used to estimate the distance to the bird (e.g., rangefinder, aerial photographs, flagging placed at known distance). Direction: Mark a slash on the circle to indicate the direction you heard the individual bird. This column is optional and only for your personal use to help keep track of individuals when several of a single species are detected at a survey point. Detected Previously: Indicate whether you detected the individual previously at another point by placing a Y (yes) or N (no) in the column. If you observed the bird previously, record the point number where the previous observation occurred in the comments section. Secondary Species: Enter the total number of individuals you observed of a secondary species by distance category ( 50 m, > m, and >100 m) into the columns provided. 7

12 Comments: Provide any information that you think is relevant, such as: 1) total number of individuals for species that could not be tracked individually; 2) notation of a bird detected outside of the wetland being surveyed (e.g., American Bittern heard in a different wetland); 3) detection of a target marsh bird while walking between points; 4) point number at which a bird was detected previously; and 5) notation of a bird that only flew over the point. Note: The number of lines filled out on the data sheet will differ among survey points and will depend on the total number of marsh birds detected at a point. If no marsh birds are detected at a survey point, record the point number, starting time, weather data, and background noise level, and then write No birds in the comments column. This will help you keep track of what survey point you are on and which ones you have completed. Habitat Information (OPTIONAL) Although recording habitat data is currently optional, we strongly encourage those observers that are comfortable assessing habitat variables to please do so. If you do not feel that you can accurately collect this information, please leave the form blank, because no data is better than erroneous data in this case. However, at a minimum, we ask that you complete the % Wetland and % Cover of Major Wetland Categories sections. Record the habitat data for each survey point on the habitat information form. These data will help scientists understand species-habitat relationships, make management/conservation decisions, and explain changes in marsh bird populations. Because our priority is to complete bird surveys at all points, please assess the habitat at a time outside of your morning or evening bird survey window. Record habitat information during each visit to your points, if possible, as habitat may change as the season progresses. All habitat data should pertain to the area within a 100-m radius of the survey point. Below are details on how to fill out each part of the habitat information form. We also provided a completed form in Appendix B as an example of how habitat data should be recorded. Do not collect habitat data during the morning/evening survey window at the expense of not finishing all bird surveys completing the bird surveys at all points is the priority. Date: Indicate the date of the habitat evaluation. Use separate data sheets for different dates. Site # and Name: Write the number and name assigned by the survey coordinator for your survey site. This information will be provided with your maps and other materials. Survey #: Circle the appropriate survey period (first, second, or third) for the season. Observer: Provide the name of the individual evaluating the habitat. Point #: List the survey point number as assigned by the survey coordinator (e.g., X-0043 ). % Wetland: Record the percent of the area within 100 m of the point that is wetland. % Cover of Major Wetland Categories: Record the percent of the area within 100 m of the point made up by each of the seven wetland categories. 8

13 Dominant Emergent Plant Taxa: Record the three most dominant emergent plant taxa within 100 m of the point and the percent of the area made up by each taxa (e.g., 60% cattails). The three dominants may not add up to 100%. For example, the total will be less than 100% if there is open water or upland near the point. Conversely, the total could be greater than 100% if there are two or more layers of vegetation, such as pockets of common reed (Phragmites australis) growing above sedges (e.g., 85% sedges and 20% common reed). Vegetation Density: Rank the overall density of the vegetation within 100 m of the survey point using the following four categories: 0 none (no vegetation present); 1 sparse (water easily visible through bases of widely scattered stems); 2 moderate (anything falling between sparse and rank); or 3 rank (water not visible through bases of stems; at water level and you cannot easily push your hand through the stems). Vegetation Height: Estimate the average height of the dominant vegetation and record it as being in one of the following four categories: 0 1 m, 1 3 m, 3 6 m, or > 6 m. Water Depth: Measure the water depth to the nearest centimeter using a meter stick. You can also measure water depth with a wooden dowel/plastic pipe by using a marker to graduate it in centimeters. These crude measuring devices also make handy walking sticks! Litter Depth: If there is dead vegetation laying on the water or ground surface, measure the depth of this litter (from water/ground surface to the top of litter layer) to the nearest centimeter. Comments: Record any pertinent notes about the habitat at the survey point (e.g., recent disturbance or management actions, changes in water levels, general description, etc.). Volunteer Effort We ask that volunteers keep track of the miles traveled and hours spent working on the Michigan Marsh Bird Survey using the volunteer effort form (Appendix A). This is important as we can use donated volunteer time and mileage as match toward grants used to support this program. Please record the type of activity (e.g., scouting, surveying, habitat data collection) in the Purpose of Effort column and be sure to include your time spent traveling to and from the survey sites. These forms should be returned with your data sheets at the end of the season. EQUIPMENT Equipment Provided to Observers Survey coordinators will provide volunteers the following items: Survey site maps/aerial photographs MP3 player with audio files Portable speaker system Extra batteries Survey protocol (this document) Data forms (i.e., bird, habitat, and volunteer effort) 9

14 Other Recommended Equipment Making sure you are prepared is a vital first step of field work. In addition to the above items, we have provided a list below of additional things you should have before starting surveys. Waterproof footwear: depending on the weather and point location, knee-high rubber boots, hip waders, or chest waders may be needed. GPS receiver: not required but extremely helpful in navigating to survey points. You can also load your point locations prior to beginning field work. Compass: GPS units break and batteries wear out you should always have a compass. Cell phone (fully charged): for safety purposes (e.g., if you become injured or lost). Flagging tape: to mark your point locations and/or known distances. Binoculars. Rangefinder: laser rangefinders are optional, but are very helpful when estimating distances to marsh birds. Rain gear: often needed for both rainy days and dew-laden mornings. Flashlight/headlamp: may be needed to get into or out of your survey area in the dark. Thermometer: necessary to record the temperature at each point. Watch/clock: needed to record start times and stay within designated survey window. Clipboard and pencils. Food and water. Insect repellant. Field vest/backpack: to hold all your gear. Float cushion: used to hold broadcast equipment when surveying in standing water. END OF SEASON TASKS Once you complete your final survey, please mail your data and volunteer effort forms to: Michael Monfils, Michigan Natural Features Inventory, MSU Extension, P.O. Box 30444, Lansing, MI To allow the survey coordinators time to review and enter the survey data, we ask that you send in your forms by July 31. Contact Michael Monfils (monfilsm@msu.edu, ) for directions on what to do with your MP3 player and speakers. Please do not assume that you should keep the equipment until next year. ADDITIONAL RESOURCES Please visit the Michigan Marsh Bird Survey webpage ( to obtain the survey protocol, data forms, and audio files, get updates about the program and upcoming workshops, and find links to more information on marsh birds. 10

15 For more information on the marsh bird and habitat monitoring protocols described herein, please see the following documents (also available as PDFs on the Michigan Marsh Bird Survey website): Conway, C. J Standardized North American Marsh Bird Monitoring Protocols, version Wildlife Research Report # U.S. Geological Survey, Arizona Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Tucson, AZ. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Habitat monitoring protocol for marsh bird surveys, draft version 1.1. If you have questions, suggestions, or comments about this survey, please contact: Michael Monfils, Michigan Natural Features Inventory, MSU Extension, , THANK YOU We cannot thank you enough for your participation in the Michigan Marsh Bird Survey. Without your efforts, surveys such as this simply would not be possible. This pilot program marks an important effort that will help pave the way for future marsh bird monitoring, management, and conservation in Michigan and beyond. Thank you for your patience, hard work, and for being part of this exciting program. Several individuals, agencies, and organizations were integral to starting and implementing this program. We thank the following individuals for their assistance: Karen Cleveland (Michigan Department of Natural Resources and Environment), Tom Funke (Michigan Audubon Society), Katie Koch (USFWS), Sarah Redding (Kalamazoo Nature Center), Mark Seamans (USFWS), and Richard Wolinski (Michigan Department of Transportation). Special thanks to Ryan Brady (Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources) for his advice and allowing our use of the Wisconsin Marsh Bird Survey Instructions, which supplied much of the text used this document. The USFWS provided funding to initiate this survey through the Upper Midwest Migratory Bird Conservation Program and the Upper Mississippi River and Great Lakes Region Joint Venture. MSU is an affirmative-action, equal-opportunity employer. Michigan State University Extension programs and materials are open to all without regard to race, color, national origin, gender, gender identity, religion, age, height, weight, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, marital status, family status or veteran status. 11

16

17 APPENDIX A Marsh Bird Survey Forms

18

19 MICHIGAN MARSH BIRD SURVEY SOUTHERN MICHIGAN Page of SURVEY OBSERVER SITE # & NAME DATE (mm/dd/yy) RESPONDED DURING SEC. SPP. COMMENTS <100m m 50m DETECTED PREVIOUSLY DIRECTION DISTANCE AIDE DISTANCE (meters) CALL TYPE(S) OUTSIDE SURVEY AMBI KIRA VIRA SORA LEBI 4-5 MIN 3-4 MIN 2-3 MIN 1-2 MIN 0-1 MIN SPECIES NOISE WIND (Beaufort) PRECIP CLOUD (%) TEMP (F) START TIME (military) POINT # CALL TYPE CODES FOR PRIMARY SPECIES COMO 1: wipe-out; 2: keep; 3: giddy-up PBGR 1: owhoop; 2: hyena YERA 1: click-click; 2: cackle; 3: wheeze AMBI 1: pump-er-lunk; 2: chu-peep; 3: kok KIRA 1: clatter; 2: kek; 3: kek-hurrah; 4: kek-burr; 5: squawk SORA 1: whinny; 2: per-weep; 3: keep WISN 1: tuk-tuk-tuk; 2: winnow; 3: rasp AMCO 1: burr-up; 2: hic-up; 3: honk LEBI 1: coo; 2: kak; 3: ert; 4: ank-ank VIRA 1: grunt; 2: tick-it; 3: kicker; 4: squawk; 5: kikik SECONDARY SPECIES Black Tern (BLTE), Forster s Tern (FOTE), Marsh Wren (MAWR), Sedge Wren (SEWR), Swamp Sparrow (SWSP), LeConte s Sparrow (LCSP), Yellow-headed Blackbird (YHBL), Sandhill Crane (SACR) PRECIPITATION 0: none; 1: light rain; 2: rain; 3: heavy rain; 4: light snow; 5: snow, 6: heavy snow, 7: fog DISTANCE AIDE CODES 0: none; 1: range finder; 2: aerial photo; 3: surveyor flags tied to vegetation BEAUFORT SCALE 0: smoke rises vertically (<1 mph); 1: wind direction shown by smoke drift (1-3 mph); 2: wind felt on face, leaves rustle (4-7 mph); 3: leaves/small twigs in constant motion and light flag extended (8-12 mph); 4: raises dust and loose paper, small branches are moved (13-18 mph); 5: small trees with leaves sway, crested wavelets on inland waters (19-24 mph) BACKGROUND NOISE 0: no noise; 1: faint noise; 2: moderate noise (cannot hear some birds beyond 100m); 3: loud noise (cannot hear some birds beyond 50m); 4: intense noise (cannot hear some birds beyond 25m)

20 MICHIGAN MARSH BIRD SURVEY NORTHERN MICHIGAN Page of SURVEY OBSERVER SITE # & NAME DATE (mm/dd/yy) RESPONDED DURING SEC. SPP. COMMENTS <100m m 50m DETECTED PREVIOUSLY DIRECTION DISTANCE AIDE DISTANCE (meters) CALL TYPE(S) OUTSIDE SURVEY AMBI VIRA SORA YERA LEBI 4-5 MIN 3-4 MIN 2-3 MIN 1-2 MIN 0-1 MIN SPECIES NOISE WIND (Beaufort) PRECIP CLOUD (%) TEMP (F) START TIME (military) POINT # CALL TYPE CODES FOR PRIMARY SPECIES COMO 1: wipe-out; 2: keep; 3: giddy-up PBGR 1: owhoop; 2: hyena YERA 1: click-click; 2: cackle; 3: wheeze AMBI 1: pump-er-lunk; 2: chu-peep; 3: kok KIRA 1: clatter; 2: kek; 3: kek-hurrah; 4: kek-burr; 5: squawk SORA 1: whinny; 2: per-weep; 3: keep WISN 1: tuk-tuk-tuk; 2: winnow; 3: rasp AMCO 1: burr-up; 2: hic-up; 3: honk LEBI 1: coo; 2: kak; 3: ert; 4: ank-ank VIRA 1: grunt; 2: tick-it; 3: kicker; 4: squawk; 5: kikik SECONDARY SPECIES Black Tern (BLTE), Forster s Tern (FOTE), Marsh Wren (MAWR), Sedge Wren (SEWR), Swamp Sparrow (SWSP), LeConte s Sparrow (LCSP), Yellow-headed Blackbird (YHBL), Sandhill Crane (SACR) PRECIPITATION 0: none; 1: light rain; 2: rain; 3: heavy rain; 4: light snow; 5: snow, 6: heavy snow, 7: fog DISTANCE AIDE CODES 0: none; 1: range finder; 2: aerial photo; 3: surveyor flags tied to vegetation BEAUFORT SCALE 0: smoke rises vertically (<1 mph); 1: wind direction shown by smoke drift (1-3 mph); 2: wind felt on face, leaves rustle (4-7 mph); 3: leaves/small twigs in constant motion and light flag extended (8-12 mph); 4: raises dust and loose paper, small branches are moved (13-18 mph); 5: small trees with leaves sway, crested wavelets on inland waters (19-24 mph) BACKGROUND NOISE 0: no noise; 1: faint noise; 2: moderate noise (cannot hear some birds beyond 100m); 3: loud noise (cannot hear some birds beyond 50m); 4: intense noise (cannot hear some birds beyond 25m)

21 DATE (mm/dd/yy) MICHIGAN MARSH BIRD SURVEY HABITAT INFORMATION *Characterize the habitat for an area within a 100-m radius circle from the survey point. SITE # & NAME SURVEY OBSERVER % COVER OF MAJOR WETLAND CATEGORIES DOMINANT EMERGENT PLANT TAXA POINT # % WETLAND EMERGENTS OPEN WATER/ AQUATIC VEG EXPOSED MUD EXPOSED SAND EXPOSED ROCK TREES SHRUBS MOST DOMINANT % SECOND DOMINANT % THIRD DOMINANT % VEGETATION DENSITY VEGETATION HEIGHT (m) WATER DEPTH (cm) LITTER DEPTH (cm) COMMENTS DOMINANT EMERGENT PLANT TAXA CODES 4 Grasses (other than reed canary grass) 8 Purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) 12 Smartweed (Polygonum spp.) 1 Cattails (Typha spp.) 5 Sedges (Carex spp.) 9 Swamp loosestrife (Decodon verticillatus) 13 Burreed (Sparganium spp.) 2 Common reed (Phragmites australis) 6 Rushes (Juncus spp.) 10 Pickerelweed (Pontederia cordata) 14 Wild rice (Zizania spp.) 3 Reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea) 7 Bulrushes (Schoenoplectus/Scirpus spp.) 11 Arrowhead (Sagittaria spp.) 15 Other (list and describe in comments) VEGETATION DENSITY 0 none 1 sparse 2 moderate 3 rank VEGETATION HEIGHT 0-1 m 1-3 m 3-6 m > 6 m

22 Bird Survey Volunteer Effort Form Volunteer name: County/counties where surveys conducted: Name of route/site surveyed: IN-KIND EFFORT Date Mileage Hours Purpose of Effort CERTIFICATION I certify that the above is correct to the best of my knowledge. Signature: Date:

23 APPENDIX B Example Bird and Habitat Data Forms

24

25

26

Avian Point-Count/Callback Survey Protocol (revised May 2015) Summary of the Standardized North American Marsh Bird Monitoring Protocols

Avian Point-Count/Callback Survey Protocol (revised May 2015) Summary of the Standardized North American Marsh Bird Monitoring Protocols SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL APPENDIX A Objectives: Avian Point-Count/Callback Survey Protocol (revised May 2015) Summary of the Standardized North American Marsh Bird Monitoring Protocols Modified From Courtney

More information

Implementing the pilot Federal Marshbird Monitoring Program in Wisconsin

Implementing the pilot Federal Marshbird Monitoring Program in Wisconsin Implementing the pilot Federal Marshbird Monitoring Program in Wisconsin Initial results and future plans Andy Paulios and Ryan Brady: WI-DNR Mark Seamans: USFWS Patuxent SECRETIVE MARSHBIRDS Not well-monitored

More information

Marsh Monitoring Program - Contact and Route Information

Marsh Monitoring Program - Contact and Route Information Marsh Monitoring Program - Contact and Route Information Please complete and return original but keep a photocopy for your own reference. Year 2 0 Marsh (choose only one) Fresh water Brackish water Salt

More information

2016 New Jersey Black Rail Survey

2016 New Jersey Black Rail Survey Background Information Citizen Science overview Black Rail: A regional perspective Black Rail in NJ Species Identification Survey protocol and requirements Survey sites Michael Allen and Don Freiday NJ

More information

Marsh Bird and Amphibian Communities in the Thunder Bay AOC,

Marsh Bird and Amphibian Communities in the Thunder Bay AOC, Marsh and Amphibian Communities in the Thunder Bay AOC, 995. Purpose of the MMP The Marsh Monitoring Program (MMP) was established to provide baseline surveys of marsh bird and amphibian populations and

More information

Grassland Bird Survey Protocol Sauvie Island Wildlife Area

Grassland Bird Survey Protocol Sauvie Island Wildlife Area Grassland Bird Survey Protocol Sauvie Island Wildlife Area Project Objective: Help determine if native grassland bird species are benefiting from restoration of grassland/pasture habitats at the Sauvie

More information

The Great Lakes Marsh Monitoring Program: 18 years of surveying birds and frogs as indicators of ecosystem health

The Great Lakes Marsh Monitoring Program: 18 years of surveying birds and frogs as indicators of ecosystem health The Great Lakes Marsh Monitoring Program: 18 years of surveying birds and frogs as indicators of ecosystem health By Doug Tozer Bird Studies Canada, Port Rowan, ON Swamp Sparrow (Degraded) Environmental

More information

Marsh Monitoring Program Participant s Handbook. For Surveying Marsh Birds

Marsh Monitoring Program Participant s Handbook. For Surveying Marsh Birds Marsh Monitoring Program Participant s Handbook For Surveying Marsh Birds Revised 2008 About This Participant s Handbook We want to clearly instruct participants in all aspects of the Marsh Monitoring

More information

MICHIGAN NIGHTJAR SURVEY PROTOCOL

MICHIGAN NIGHTJAR SURVEY PROTOCOL MICHIGAN NIGHTJAR SURVEY PROTOCOL - 2011 For More Information Contact: David L. Cuthrell Michigan Natural Features Inventory Michigan State University Extension P.O. Box 30444 Lansing, MI 48909-7944 cuthrell@msu.edu/517-235-6627

More information

Survey Protocol for the Yellow-billed Cuckoo Western Distinct Population Segment

Survey Protocol for the Yellow-billed Cuckoo Western Distinct Population Segment Survey Protocol for the Yellow-billed Cuckoo Western Distinct Population Segment Halterman, MD, MJ Johnson, JA Holmes, and SA Laymon. 2016. A Natural History Summary and Survey Protocol for the Western

More information

Marsh Bird and Amphibian Communities in the Bay of Quinte AOC,

Marsh Bird and Amphibian Communities in the Bay of Quinte AOC, Marsh and ibian Communities in the Bay of Quinte AOC, 99. Purpose of the MMP The Marsh Monitoring Program (MMP) was established to provide baseline surveys of marsh bird and amphibian populations and their

More information

Klamath Marsh National Wildlife Refuge BCS number: 48-16

Klamath Marsh National Wildlife Refuge BCS number: 48-16 Oregon Coordinated Aquatic Bird Monitoring: Description of Important Aquatic Bird Site Klamath Marsh National Wildlife Refuge BCS number: 48-16 Site description author(s) Carol Damberg, Klamath Marsh NWR

More information

2011 Wood River Wetland Yellow Rail (Coturnicops neveboracensis noveboracensis) Survey Report

2011 Wood River Wetland Yellow Rail (Coturnicops neveboracensis noveboracensis) Survey Report 2011 Wood River Wetland Yellow Rail (Coturnicops neveboracensis noveboracensis) Survey Report Project Description The Bureau of Land Management s Wood River Wetland is located in T34S-R 7 1/2E; the wetland

More information

Québec Marsh Monitoring Program

Québec Marsh Monitoring Program Québec Marsh Monitoring Program Training kit and instructions for surveying marsh birds and their habitats 2008 Edition (Québec) About this training kit We want to clearly instruct participants in all

More information

Assessing the Importance of Wetlands on DoD Installations for the Persistence of Wetland-Dependent Birds in North America (Legacy )

Assessing the Importance of Wetlands on DoD Installations for the Persistence of Wetland-Dependent Birds in North America (Legacy ) Assessing the Importance of Wetlands on DoD Installations for the Persistence of Wetland-Dependent Birds in North America (Legacy 12-610) Abstract Wetlands are among the most imperiled ecosystems in the

More information

American Bittern Minnesota Conservation Summary

American Bittern Minnesota Conservation Summary Credit Jim Williams American Bittern Minnesota Conservation Summary Audubon Minnesota Spring 2014 The Blueprint for Minnesota Bird Conservation is a project of Audubon Minnesota written by Lee A. Pfannmuller

More information

Upper Klamath National Wildlife Refuge Complex Upper Klamath Unit and Hank s Marsh Unit BCS Number: 48-29

Upper Klamath National Wildlife Refuge Complex Upper Klamath Unit and Hank s Marsh Unit BCS Number: 48-29 Oregon Coordinated Aquatic Bird Monitoring: Description of Important Aquatic Bird Site Upper Klamath National Wildlife Refuge Complex Upper Klamath Unit and Hank s Marsh Unit BCS Number: 48-29 Site description

More information

Wanaket Wildlife Area BCS number: 48-30

Wanaket Wildlife Area BCS number: 48-30 Oregon Coordinated Aquatic Bird Monitoring: Description of Important Aquatic Bird Site Wanaket Wildlife Area BCS number: 48-30 Site description author(s) M. Cathy Nowak, ODFW, Ladd Marsh Wildlife Area

More information

Marsh Bird and Amphibian Communities in the St. Lawrence River (Canada and USA) AOC,

Marsh Bird and Amphibian Communities in the St. Lawrence River (Canada and USA) AOC, Marsh and ibian Communities in the St. Lawrence River (Canada and USA) AOC, 99. Purpose of the MMP The Marsh Monitoring Program (MMP) was established to provide baseline surveys of marsh bird and amphibian

More information

Mud Slough Wetland Reserve BCS number: 47-19

Mud Slough Wetland Reserve BCS number: 47-19 Mud Slough Wetland Reserve BCS number: 47-19 ***NOTE: We were unable to determine all necessary information for this site description. If you would like to contribute the needed information to this description,

More information

Warner Wetlands / Warner Valley BCS number: 48-31

Warner Wetlands / Warner Valley BCS number: 48-31 Oregon Coordinated Aquatic Bird Monitoring: Description of Important Aquatic Bird Site Warner Wetlands / Warner Valley BCS number: 48-31 Site description author(s) Vernon Stofleth, Lakeview BLM District

More information

Ladd Marsh Wildlife Area BCS number: 49-3

Ladd Marsh Wildlife Area BCS number: 49-3 Oregon Coordinated Aquatic Bird Monitoring: Description of Important Aquatic Bird Site Ladd Marsh Wildlife Area BCS number: 49-3 Site description author M. Cathy Nowak, Ladd Marsh Wildlife Area Biologist

More information

Title Marsh Bird Habitat Restoration and Management on Private and Public land in Arkansas Mississippi Alluvial Valley

Title Marsh Bird Habitat Restoration and Management on Private and Public land in Arkansas Mississippi Alluvial Valley Title Marsh Bird Habitat Restoration and Management on Private and Public land in Arkansas Mississippi Alluvial Valley Project Summary: Changes in habitat and hydrology have caused serious declines in

More information

Jackson Bottom Wetlands Preserve BCS Number: 47-14

Jackson Bottom Wetlands Preserve BCS Number: 47-14 Jackson Bottom Wetlands Preserve BCS Number: 47-14 Site description author(s) Greg Gillson, Jackson Bottom Wetlands Preserve Primary contact for this site Ed Becker, Natural Resources Manager, Jackson

More information

Killin Wetland (Cedar Canyon Marsh) BCS number: 47-15

Killin Wetland (Cedar Canyon Marsh) BCS number: 47-15 Killin Wetland (Cedar Canyon Marsh) BCS number: 47-15 ***NOTE: We were unable to determine all necessary information for this site description. If you would like to contribute the needed information to

More information

River s End Ranch BCS number: 48-21

River s End Ranch BCS number: 48-21 Oregon Coordinated Aquatic Bird Monitoring: Description of Important Aquatic Bird Site River s End Ranch BCS number: 48-21 Site description author(s) Martin St. Lewis, Area Manager, Summer Lake Wildlife

More information

Lake St. Clair Coastal Wetlands in 2050: Modelling Wetland Community Responses to Climate Change Water Level Scenarios

Lake St. Clair Coastal Wetlands in 2050: Modelling Wetland Community Responses to Climate Change Water Level Scenarios Lake St. Clair Coastal Wetlands in 2050: Modelling Wetland Community Responses to Climate Change Water Level Scenarios Joel W. Ingram 1, Linda D. Mortsch 2, Susan E. Doka 3, Andrea J. Hebb 2, Shawn W.

More information

STANDARDIZED NORTH AMERICAN MARSH BIRD MONITORING PROTOCOLS

STANDARDIZED NORTH AMERICAN MARSH BIRD MONITORING PROTOCOLS ARIZONA COOPERATIVE FISH AND WILDLIFE RESEARCH UNIT January 2006 STANDARDIZED NORTH AMERICAN MARSH BIRD MONITORING PROTOCOLS by Courtney J. Conway Wildlife Research Report #2005-04 Conway, 30 January 2006

More information

Wetland Amphibian Monitoring Protocol

Wetland Amphibian Monitoring Protocol Wetland Amphibian Monitoring Protocol Terrestrial Long-term Fixed Plot Monitoring Program Regional Watershed Monitoring and Reporting November 2011 Report prepared by: Reviewed by: Paul Prior, Fauna Biologist

More information

Wetland Bird Monitoring Protocol

Wetland Bird Monitoring Protocol Wetland Bird Monitoring Protocol Terrestrial Long-term Fixed Plot Monitoring Program Regional Watershed Monitoring and Reporting January 2016 Report prepared by: Reviewed by: Paul Prior, Fauna Biologist

More information

Malheur National Wildlife Refuge BCS number: 48-18

Malheur National Wildlife Refuge BCS number: 48-18 Oregon Coordinated Aquatic Bird Monitoring: Description of Important Aquatic Bird Site Malheur National Wildlife Refuge BCS number: 48-18 Site description author(s) Sally Hall, Volunteer, Malheur NWR Roger

More information

Sauvie Island Wildlife Area BCS number: 47-28

Sauvie Island Wildlife Area BCS number: 47-28 Sauvie Island Wildlife Area BCS number: 47-28 Site description author(s) Mark Nebeker, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Sauvie Island Wildlife Area Manager Primary contact for this site Mark Nebeker,

More information

Activity 3: Adult Monarch Survey

Activity 3: Adult Monarch Survey Activity 3: Adult Monarch Survey Overview Participants establish an adult monarch survey route within the monitoring plot and count adult monarchs within defined spaces along the route, documenting their

More information

WISCONSIN RED-SHOULDERED HAWK SURVEY Instructions Booklet 2012

WISCONSIN RED-SHOULDERED HAWK SURVEY Instructions Booklet 2012 WISCONSIN RED-SHOULDERED HAWK SURVEY Instructions Booklet 2012 ***Please direct all comments and questions to the survey coordinator Ryan Brady, Wisconsin DNR, 2501 Golf Course Rd, Ashland, WI 54806, 715.685.2933,

More information

MMP Protocol. Route and Station Selection and Characteristics. Amphibian Survey Protocol. What is marsh habitat?

MMP Protocol. Route and Station Selection and Characteristics. Amphibian Survey Protocol. What is marsh habitat? MMP Protocol Route and Station Selection and Characteristics Upon registering with the MMP, volunteers receive an MMP Training Kit that includes: a detailed protocol booklet; field and summary data forms;

More information

McKay Creek National Wildlife Refuge BCS number: 48-19

McKay Creek National Wildlife Refuge BCS number: 48-19 Oregon Coordinated Aquatic Bird Monitoring: Description of Important Aquatic Bird Site McKay Creek National Wildlife Refuge BCS number: 48-19 Site description author(s) Howard Browers, Supervisory Wildlife

More information

GENERAL PROTOCOL CONTENTS

GENERAL PROTOCOL CONTENTS GENERAL PROTOCOL CONTENTS GENERAL PROTOCOL...3.2.2 Summary of protocols...3.2.2 Survey recommendations and tips...3.2.3 Forest bird recordings...3.2.5 Cowbirds and nest predators...3.2.6 Nests...3.2.6

More information

Smith and Bybee Wetlands Natural Area BCS number 47-33

Smith and Bybee Wetlands Natural Area BCS number 47-33 Smith and Bybee Wetlands Natural Area BCS number 47-33 Site description author(s) Elaine Stewart, Smith and Bybee Lakes Wildlife Area Manager Danielle Morris, Research and Monitoring Team, Klamath Bird

More information

Protecting our Natural Areas from Phragmites and other Invaders

Protecting our Natural Areas from Phragmites and other Invaders Protecting our Natural Areas from Phragmites and other Invaders by Laurie Kaufman www.stewardshipnetwork.org/midmich Asclepias incarnata, photo by Laurie Kaufman What do we mean by Invasive Species? The

More information

Smith River Mouth BCS number: 86-6

Smith River Mouth BCS number: 86-6 Smith River Mouth BCS number: 86-6 ***NOTE: We were unable to determine all necessary information for this site description. If you would like to contribute the needed information to this description,

More information

Biological Inventories

Biological Inventories Field Lab 1 Urban Ecology Center Biological Inventories Introduction In order to begin work on our semester research project, this week we will be conducting biological inventories at a moderately disturbed

More information

North American Amphibian Monitoring Program. Massachusetts Procedures and Protocols Spring 2007

North American Amphibian Monitoring Program. Massachusetts Procedures and Protocols Spring 2007 North American Amphibian Monitoring Program Massachusetts Procedures and Protocols Spring 2007 Overview The North American Amphibian Monitoring Program (NAAMP) seeks to involve volunteers in a longterm

More information

Oregon Dunes National Recreation Area BCS Number: 47-5

Oregon Dunes National Recreation Area BCS Number: 47-5 Oregon Dunes National Recreation Area BCS Number: 47-5 ***NOTE: We were unable to determine all necessary information for this site description. If you would like to contribute the needed information to

More information

TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS... 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 2 INTRODUCTION... 4 METHODS... 5 Route and Station Selection and Characteristics...

TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS... 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 2 INTRODUCTION... 4 METHODS... 5 Route and Station Selection and Characteristics... The Marsh Monitoring Program Report: Monitoring Great Lakes Wetlands and Their Amphibian and Bird Inhabitants Steven T.A. Timmermans and G. Eoin Craigie Bird Studies Canada P.O. Box 16 Port Rowan, Ontario

More information

Western Great Lakes Region Owl Monitoring

Western Great Lakes Region Owl Monitoring Western Great Lakes Region Owl Monitoring For Minnesota and Wisconsin 2017 Instruction Booklet Western Great Lakes Region Owl Monitoring Protocol Introduction: There is increasing concern about the distribution,

More information

Standardized North American Marsh Bird Monitoring Protocol

Standardized North American Marsh Bird Monitoring Protocol Standardized North American Marsh Bird Monitoring Protocol Author: Courtney J. Conway Source: Waterbirds, 34(3) : 319-346 Published By: Waterbird Society URL: https://doi.org/10.1675/063.034.0307 BioOne

More information

North American Amphibian Monitoring Program. Massachusetts Procedures and Protocols. Southern New England Physiographic Region

North American Amphibian Monitoring Program. Massachusetts Procedures and Protocols. Southern New England Physiographic Region North American Amphibian Monitoring Program Massachusetts Procedures and Protocols Southern New England Physiographic Region Overview The North American Amphibian Monitoring Program (NAAMP) seeks to involve

More information

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2019 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2019 Request for Proposals (RFP) Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2019 Request for Proposals (RFP) Project Title: Implementing Conservation Plans for Avian Species of Concern Category: H. Proposals seeking 200,000 or less

More information

Tualatin River NWR and Wapato Lake BCS number: 47-37

Tualatin River NWR and Wapato Lake BCS number: 47-37 Tualatin River NWR and Wapato Lake BCS number: 47-37 ***NOTE: We were unable to determine all necessary information for this site description. If you would like to contribute the needed information to

More information

Tahkenitch Creek Estuary BCS number: 47-35

Tahkenitch Creek Estuary BCS number: 47-35 Tahkenitch Creek Estuary BCS number: 47-35 ***NOTE: We were unable to determine all necessary information for this site description. If you would like to contribute the needed information to this description,

More information

How to Observe. Access the species profiles using The Plants and Animals link in the Nature s Notebook navigation menu.

How to Observe. Access the species profiles using The Plants and Animals link in the Nature s Notebook navigation menu. How to Observe Nature s Notebook Plant and Animal Observations 3. START OBSERVING! a) Get Organized to Go Outside Now that you have set up your site outside and created your account online, you are ready

More information

Watching for Whoopers in Wisconsin Wetlands

Watching for Whoopers in Wisconsin Wetlands Summary Students make maps of their communities to explore whooping crane habitat close to their neighborhoods. Objectives: Students will be able to: Use a variety of geographic representations, such as

More information

Beaver Island Archipelago: Invasive Species Control Final Report Submitted by:

Beaver Island Archipelago: Invasive Species Control Final Report Submitted by: Beaver Island Archipelago: Invasive Species Control Final Report Submitted by: 4371 N Long Lake Rd Traverse City, MI 49684 wildlife@wildlifewetlands.com (231) 943-0762 Project Plan and Schedule 2014 Treatment

More information

Black-crowned Night-heron Minnesota Conservation Summary

Black-crowned Night-heron Minnesota Conservation Summary Credit Deborah Reynolds Black-crowned Night-heron Minnesota Conservation Summary Audubon Minnesota Spring 2014 The Blueprint for Minnesota Bird Conservation is a project of Audubon Minnesota written by

More information

Fernhill Wetlands BCS number: 47-13

Fernhill Wetlands BCS number: 47-13 Fernhill Wetlands BCS number: 47-13 ***NOTE: We were unable to determine all necessary information for this site description. If you would like to contribute the needed information to this description,

More information

Baskett Slough National Wildlife Refuge BCS number: 47-4

Baskett Slough National Wildlife Refuge BCS number: 47-4 Baskett Slough National Wildlife Refuge BCS number: 47-4 Site description author(s) Daphne E. Swope, Research and Monitoring Team, Klamath Bird Observatory Primary contact for this site N/A Location (UTM)

More information

Marsh Bird and Amphibian Communities in the Durham Region of Lake Ontario from 1995 through 2002.

Marsh Bird and Amphibian Communities in the Durham Region of Lake Ontario from 1995 through 2002. Marsh and ibian Communities in the Region of Lake Ontario from 995 through 00. Introduction to the Great Lakes basin The Great Lakes basin is a globally important for its freshwater resources, encompassing

More information

Hawk Survey Summary 2007

Hawk Survey Summary 2007 Hawk Survey Summary 7 Park Inventory Sites Hawk Surveys were performed in Cascade Valley and Goodyear Heights Metro Parks in conjunction with the comprehensive park inventories. These surveys were conducted

More information

Alvord Lake BCS number: 48-2

Alvord Lake BCS number: 48-2 Oregon Coordinated Aquatic Bird Monitoring: Description of Important Aquatic Bird Site Alvord Lake BCS number: 48-2 Site description author(s) Whitney Haskell, Data Management Intern, Klamath Bird Observatory

More information

Wood Stork Nesting Population Survey Results 2016 and Radio-tracking Dice

Wood Stork Nesting Population Survey Results 2016 and Radio-tracking Dice Wood Stork Nesting Population Survey Results 2016 and Radio-tracking Dice Sara H. Schweitzer Wildlife Diversity Program North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission Annika Anderson and Edye Kornegay (NCWRC)

More information

Birding at a Slower Pace - An Holistic Approach to Observing Birds: Why atlasing will improve your field skills AND your birding experience

Birding at a Slower Pace - An Holistic Approach to Observing Birds: Why atlasing will improve your field skills AND your birding experience Birding at a Slower Pace - An Holistic Approach to Observing Birds: Why atlasing will improve your field skills AND your birding experience Bill Mueller, Director, Western Great Lakes Bird and Bat Observatory

More information

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund (ENRTF) M.L ENRTF Work Plan (Main Document)

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund (ENRTF) M.L ENRTF Work Plan (Main Document) Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund (ENRTF) M.L. 2019 ENRTF Work Plan (Main Document) Today s Date: 8/24/2018 Date of Next Status Update Report: May 1, 2020 Date of Work Plan Approval: Project

More information

Great Lakes Marsh Monitoring Program Amphibian Survey Data Form Tips

Great Lakes Marsh Monitoring Program Amphibian Survey Data Form Tips Great Lakes Marsh Monitoring Program Amphibian Survey Data Form Tips By Kathy. Jones October 2017 Ontario Program Volunteer Coordinator, Bird Studies Canada, Port Rowan, ON The Route/Contact Form Section

More information

The following protocols should begin as soon as feasible after identification of a diurnal roost (ideally that night):

The following protocols should begin as soon as feasible after identification of a diurnal roost (ideally that night): PERSONNEL Qualified biologists 48, biological technicians, and any other individuals deemed qualified by a local USFWS FO may conduct emergence surveys for Indiana bats by following the protocols below.

More information

Work Plan for Pre-Construction Avian and Bat Surveys

Work Plan for Pre-Construction Avian and Bat Surveys Work Plan for Pre-Construction Avian and Bat Surveys, Steuben County, New York Prepared For: EverPower Wind Holdings, Inc. 1251 Waterfront Place, 3rd Floor Pittsburgh, PA 15222 Prepared By: Stantec Consulting

More information

Eastern Screech-Owl Survey INSTRUCTION MANUAL

Eastern Screech-Owl Survey INSTRUCTION MANUAL Eastern Screech-Owl Survey INSTRUCTION MANUAL Ontario Breeding Bird Atlas c/o University of Guelph Blackwood Hall, Room 211 Guelph, ON N1G 2W1 1-866-900-7100 atlas@uoguelph.ca www.birdsontario.og TABLE

More information

Long-billed Curlew Surveys in the Mission Valley, 2017

Long-billed Curlew Surveys in the Mission Valley, 2017 Long-billed Curlew Surveys in the Mission Valley, 2017 This year, 20 volunteers scoured the Mission Valley along 22 driving routes to locate North America s largest shorebird (curlew by Raylene Wall above

More information

2008 Marsh Bird and Anuran Species Occurrence and Abundance at Long Point Inner Bay Wetlands

2008 Marsh Bird and Anuran Species Occurrence and Abundance at Long Point Inner Bay Wetlands 2008 Marsh Bird and Anuran Species Occurrence and Abundance at Long Point Inner Bay Wetlands Prepared for Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Lake Erie Management Unit P.O. Box 429, 1 Passmore St. Port

More information

STROLLING FOR CERULEANS & ASSOCIATED SPECIES AVIAN LINE TRANSECT PROTOCOL

STROLLING FOR CERULEANS & ASSOCIATED SPECIES AVIAN LINE TRANSECT PROTOCOL STROLLING FOR CERULEANS & ASSOCIATED SPECIES AVIAN LINE TRANSECT PROTOCOL (BORROWED & MODELED AFTER AVIAN LINE TRANSECT PROTOCOL SHENANDOAH NATIONAL PARK) 1 BACKGROUND/RATIONALE Artwork by Gabriella Martinez

More information

Protocol for Censusing Yellow-billed Magpies (Pica nuttalli) at Communal Roosts

Protocol for Censusing Yellow-billed Magpies (Pica nuttalli) at Communal Roosts Protocol for Censusing Yellow-billed Magpies (Pica nuttalli) at Communal Roosts Introduction It is generally accepted that Yellow-billed Magpie populations are declining since the arrival of the West Nile

More information

AVIAN USE OF ROADSIDE HABITAT IN THE SOUTHERN DRIFT PLAINS OF NORTH DAKOTA AND IMPLICATIONS FOR CATTAIL (TYPHA SPP.) MANAGEMENT

AVIAN USE OF ROADSIDE HABITAT IN THE SOUTHERN DRIFT PLAINS OF NORTH DAKOTA AND IMPLICATIONS FOR CATTAIL (TYPHA SPP.) MANAGEMENT AVIAN USE OF ROADSIDE HABITAT IN THE SOUTHERN DRIFT PLAINS OF NORTH DAKOTA AND IMPLICATIONS FOR CATTAIL (TYPHA SPP.) MANAGEMENT Bryan D. Safratowich, Department of Biological Sciences, Stevens Hall, North

More information

Long-billed Curlew Surveys in the Mission Valley, 2015

Long-billed Curlew Surveys in the Mission Valley, 2015 Long-billed Curlew Surveys in the Mission Valley, 2015 Janene Lichtenberg lead a field trips in the Mission Valley, talking about Curlews, and volunteers scoured the valley for along 25 driving routes

More information

IBA Monitoring Guide

IBA Monitoring Guide IBA Monitoring Guide Introduction The Important Bird Area (IBA) Program was launched by Audubon Arkansas in 2001 to create an inventory of critical bird breeding, wintering, and migratory stopover areas

More information

Humboldt Bay NWR BCS number: 86-4

Humboldt Bay NWR BCS number: 86-4 Humboldt Bay NWR BCS number: 86-4 ***NOTE: We were unable to determine all necessary information for this site description. If you would like to contribute the needed information to this description, please

More information

Paulina Marsh BCS number: 48-20

Paulina Marsh BCS number: 48-20 Oregon Coordinated Aquatic Bird Monitoring: Description of Important Aquatic Bird Site Paulina Marsh BCS number: 48-20 Site description author(s) Nick David, Aquatic Project Lead, Klamath Bird Observatory

More information

4-H Conservation Guidelines

4-H Conservation Guidelines 4-H Conservation Guidelines The following are guidelines for providing learning experiences in the conservation project area. THE GUIDELINES FOR ALL MEMBERS Understand what Natural Resources are; how to

More information

Cat Island Chain Restoration Project Brown County Port & Resource Recovery Department

Cat Island Chain Restoration Project Brown County Port & Resource Recovery Department Cat Island Chain Restoration Project Brown County Port & Resource Recovery Department February 2, 2015 Fox River and Lower Green Bay Cat Island Chain - 1938 Cat Island Brown County Aerial Photography,

More information

WILDLIFE MONITORING FOR THE COLLABORATIVE FOREST RESTORATION PROGRAM Protocols for Monitoring Birds, Turkey, Deer and Elk

WILDLIFE MONITORING FOR THE COLLABORATIVE FOREST RESTORATION PROGRAM Protocols for Monitoring Birds, Turkey, Deer and Elk WILDLIFE MONITORING FOR THE COLLABORATIVE FOREST RESTORATION PROGRAM Protocols for Monitoring Birds, Turkey, Deer and Elk David Parsons Melissa Savage January 2008 New Mexico Forest Restoration Series

More information

Sensitive Wildlife Species Surveys and Observations for the White Pines Wind Resource Area Field Season

Sensitive Wildlife Species Surveys and Observations for the White Pines Wind Resource Area Field Season Sensitive Wildlife Species Surveys and Observations for the White Pines Wind Resource Area - 2009 Field Season Prepared By: Joelle Gehring, Ph.D. Senior Conservation Scientist-Zoology Section Leader Michigan

More information

The Adirondack Tremolo

The Adirondack Tremolo The Adirondack Tremolo 2004 Winter Newsletter Volume 3, Issue 1 Loon Migration Linking People and the Environment Every fall, the most common question asked of the Adirondack Cooperative Loon Program is

More information

Western Asio flammeus Landscape Survey (WAfLS) Protocol

Western Asio flammeus Landscape Survey (WAfLS) Protocol Western Asio flammeus Landscape Survey (WAfLS) Protocol Protocol Version: 2018a Equipment Needed: 1) GPS unit or Smartphone. We will use decimal degrees for all coordinates (e.g., IBO Offices are located

More information

Sandhill Cranes and Waterfowl of the North Platte River Valley: Evaluation of Habitat Selection to Guide Conservation Delivery

Sandhill Cranes and Waterfowl of the North Platte River Valley: Evaluation of Habitat Selection to Guide Conservation Delivery Sandhill Cranes and Waterfowl of the North Platte River Valley: Evaluation of Habitat Selection to Guide Conservation Delivery { Emily Munter, Wildlife Biologist U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Nebraska

More information

MARSH BIRD, AMPHIBIAN AND ASSOCIATED HABITAT INVENTORIES AT RONDEAU PROVINCIAL PARK Final Report of 2005 Project Activities

MARSH BIRD, AMPHIBIAN AND ASSOCIATED HABITAT INVENTORIES AT RONDEAU PROVINCIAL PARK Final Report of 2005 Project Activities MARSH BIRD, AMPHIBIAN AND ASSOCIATED HABITAT INVENTORIES AT RONDEAU PROVINCIAL PARK Final Report of 2005 Project Activities Steven T.A. Timmermans Ryan W. Archer and Tara L. Crewe Table of Contents Table

More information

Unit 3 Phenology LESSON OUTLINE: OUTCOMES: GRADUATION STANDARDS: KEY CONCEPTS: and abiotic factors can change over time.

Unit 3 Phenology LESSON OUTLINE: OUTCOMES: GRADUATION STANDARDS: KEY CONCEPTS: and abiotic factors can change over time. Unit 3 Phenology Unit 3 Phenology LESSON OUTLINE: I. January to June multi-year Outdoor Phenological Study: a collection of observations that students will use to compare current to previous years data.

More information

Walking In the Marsh: Methods to Increase Safety and Reduce Impacts to Wildlife/Plants

Walking In the Marsh: Methods to Increase Safety and Reduce Impacts to Wildlife/Plants Walking In the Marsh: Methods to Increase Safety and Reduce Impacts to Wildlife/Plants I. Safety A. Before heading out into the marsh check the tides: tides can affect your ability to move through the

More information

Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus

Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus Plant Composition and Density Mosaic Distance to Water Prey Populations Cliff Properties Minimum Patch Size Recommended Patch Size Home Range Photo by Christy Klinger Habitat Use Profile Habitats Used

More information

Expansion Work Has Begun The perimeter dike for Cell 7 is now visible

Expansion Work Has Begun The perimeter dike for Cell 7 is now visible Summer/Fall 2017 In This Issue Poplar Island Expansion Wetland Cell 5AB Development Wildlife Update Birding tours on Poplar Island Expansion Work Has Begun The perimeter dike for Cell 7 is now visible

More information

PART FIVE: Grassland and Field Habitat Management

PART FIVE: Grassland and Field Habitat Management PART FIVE: Grassland and Field Habitat Management PAGE 64 15. GRASSLAND HABITAT MANAGEMENT Some of Vermont s most imperiled birds rely on the fields that many Vermonters manage as part of homes and farms.

More information

Mississippi s Conservation Reserve Program CP33 - Habitat Buffers for Upland Birds Mississippi Bird Monitoring and Evaluation Plan

Mississippi s Conservation Reserve Program CP33 - Habitat Buffers for Upland Birds Mississippi Bird Monitoring and Evaluation Plan Mississippi s Conservation Reserve Program CP33 - Habitat Buffers for Upland Birds Mississippi Bird Monitoring and Evaluation Plan 2007 Annual Report Mississippi s Conservation Reserve Program CP33 -

More information

FINAL REPORT Monitoring secretive marsh birds in Everglades National Park: a pilot study

FINAL REPORT Monitoring secretive marsh birds in Everglades National Park: a pilot study FINAL REPORT Monitoring secretive marsh birds in Everglades National Park: a pilot study COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT: P13AC00021 PROJECT DIRECTOR: Principal Investigator: Gary L. Slater PROJECT PERSONNEL: Wildlife

More information

Catalog of Upper Mississippi River and Great Lakes Region Joint Venture GIS Data March 2009 Version 1

Catalog of Upper Mississippi River and Great Lakes Region Joint Venture GIS Data March 2009 Version 1 Catalog of Upper Mississippi River and Great Lakes Region Joint Venture GIS Data March 2009 Version 1 Compiled by: Bradly Potter Introduction This catalog contains descriptions of GIS data available from

More information

Progress on Marsh Bird Monitoring in Prairie Canada. Kiel Drake, Bird Studies Canada

Progress on Marsh Bird Monitoring in Prairie Canada. Kiel Drake, Bird Studies Canada Progress on Marsh Bird Monitoring in Prairie Canada Kiel Drake, Bird Studies Canada PHJV area BCR11 (&6) Prairie MMP: JV-driven at inception 1. DSS Models: maps based on spphabitat models 2. Assess value

More information

Siletz Bay BCS number: 47-29

Siletz Bay BCS number: 47-29 Siletz Bay BCS number: 47-29 ***NOTE: We were unable to determine all necessary information for this site description. If you would like to contribute the needed information to this description, please

More information

Atlantic. O n t h e. One of the best parts of fall is hearing the cacophony of honking,

Atlantic. O n t h e. One of the best parts of fall is hearing the cacophony of honking, O n t h e Atlantic Flyway Keeping track of New Hampshire s waterfowl is an international affair. One of the best parts of fall is hearing the cacophony of honking, high-flying geese as they pass overhead.

More information

Habitat Stewardship Series N E W H A M P S H I R E W I L D L I F E A C T I O N P L A N

Habitat Stewardship Series N E W H A M P S H I R E W I L D L I F E A C T I O N P L A N Marsh and Shrub Wetlands Habitat Stewardship Series N E W H A M P S H I R E W I L D L I F E A C T I O N P L A N Recognizing marsh and shrub wetlands Marsh and shrub wetlands encompass a variety of wetland

More information

T.S Roberts Bird Sanctuary Improvements Project

T.S Roberts Bird Sanctuary Improvements Project T.S Roberts Bird Sanctuary Improvements Project Dr. David Zumeta Ornithology and Forest Habitat Expert Jason Aune Landscape Architect, AFLA Tyler Pederson Project Manager Michael Schroeder Assistant Superintendent

More information

Richard A. Fischer, Ph.D. U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center Environmental Laboratory

Richard A. Fischer, Ph.D. U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center Environmental Laboratory Regional Sediment Management - Beneficial Uses of Dredged Material Along Lake Erie and Tributaries Section 204 of the 1992 Water Resources Development Act Richard A. Fischer, Ph.D. U.S. Army Engineer Research

More information

Restoration of Emergent Wetlands on Steve N. Wilson Raft Creek Bottoms WMA in the Mississippi Alluvial Plain Ecoregion

Restoration of Emergent Wetlands on Steve N. Wilson Raft Creek Bottoms WMA in the Mississippi Alluvial Plain Ecoregion Restoration of Emergent Wetlands on Steve N. Wilson Raft Creek Bottoms WMA in the Mississippi Alluvial Plain Ecoregion Project Summary: The Arkansas Wildlife Action Plan has identified six marsh bird species

More information

Phragmites australis control projects at Long Point and Rondeau

Phragmites australis control projects at Long Point and Rondeau Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry Phragmites australis control projects at Long Point and Rondeau Emergency Use Registration for application of herbicide over water Saturday April 22, 2017 Dustin

More information

Fall 2001 Whooping Crane Migrational Survey Protocol Implementation Report

Fall 2001 Whooping Crane Migrational Survey Protocol Implementation Report Fall 2001 Whooping Crane Migrational Survey Protocol Implementation Report Prepared by Executive Director s Office For Committee s of the Platte River Cooperative Agreement June 5, 2002 I. Introduction

More information