Legal Alert: New Defense Department Guidance on Mergers and Acquisitions
|
|
- Byron Short
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 by Jeffrey P. Bialos October 8, 2015 On September 30, the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD or the Department) issued new guidance that reaffirmed its earlier view that it would not look favorably on mergers of top tier defense firms. The Department declared its intent to work with Congress on possible legislation that would fill the gaps in existing antitrust law and provide additional authorities to help preserve the innovation that has been central to the U.S. defense industrial base. The guidance reflected DoD s articulated concern about the continuing march toward greater consolidation in the defense industry at the prime contractor level in the context of declining defense budgets and its desire to ensure the presence of a sufficient number of contractors to provide an innovative and affordable war fighting capability. Executive Summary The thrust of the new DoD guidance is that the recent U.S. government decision to clear, without a full investigation, the Lockheed Martin acquisition of Sikorsky does not mean open season for parties to engage in large defense mergers. Rather, the guidance, in the form of a statement made by Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics (AT&L) Frank Kendall and related comments by Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter, raised significant policy concerns over acquisitions like the Lockheed/Sikorsky transaction i.e., transactions that might allow one or more large prime contractors to dominate large parts of the defense industry. The DoD statement also makes it clear that while the Lockheed/Sikorsky deal one of the most significant defense mergers in years technically does not trigger anti-trust concerns under existing law, the Defense Department will seek additional legal authority from Congress to investigate and resolve the significant policy concerns raised by such transactions. While today s antitrust laws allow the U.S. antitrust agencies (the Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC)), working with the DoD, to challenge transactions that adversely affect competition in particular relevant markets, the type of broader concerns that DoD has now raised about the overall power such a large firm would have due to its strong positions in multiple markets are at the edge of existing antitrust authority. Thus Under Secretary Kendall has referred to the possible need to add national security considerations into the antitrust law to address these types of situations. With respect to existing legal authority, this new DoD guidance on prime level mergers is not a radical departure in direction or process. However, it does clearly signal a heightened level of DoD concern over the national security implications of defense mergers when evaluating mergers on antitrust grounds i.e., the need to maintain a competitive defense industrial base and the innovation and affordability it can bring to the war fighter. In effect, DoD is taking the view that today s defense industrial structure is at a tipping point, and future large-scale consolidation could adversely affect competition. However, DoD s announcement that it will work with Congress to seek additional authority to block defense mergers on policy grounds beyond the four corners of the antitrust law is new and undoubtedly will be subject to close scrutiny by Congress and the defense industry. While unstated, the DoD guidance clearly suggests that the Department would like additional authority to undertake fuller investigations (with the submission of additional information by the parties) when these policy issues arise. Simply put, the policy question is whether it makes sense to authorize DoD to intervene, beyond the scope of existing antitrust laws, to stop a merger if DoD determines it may create a contractor or contractors whose sheer size and dominant positions in multiple product areas may create a market structure that is adverse to competition, and the innovation and affordability it can bring to defense markets. This communication is for general informational purposes only and is not intended to constitute legal advice or a recommended course of action in any given situation. This communication is not intended to be, and should not be, relied upon by the recipient in making decisions of a legal nature with respect to the issues discussed herein. The recipient is encouraged to consult independent counsel before making any decisions or taking any action concerning the matters in this communication. This communication does not create an attorney-client relationship between Sutherland and the recipient.
2 The Policy Context The new DoD statement reaffirms the guidance then-under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology & Logistics Ashton Carter gave in 2011, when he stated that the Department will likely not support further consolidation of prime level weapons systems contractors. Carter also said that the Department would welcome other merger proposals (i.e., other than prime-to-prime consolidations) and will review them on a case-by-case basis to ensure that the Department s interests are taken into account. At the time, Carter told Bloomberg News that the Defense Department today is down to about five or six very large prime contractors who bid on many, many of our jobs and, in the interest of competition, we are not interested in seeing further consolidation and reduction in that number.but with that exception just about everything else is on the table. At the time, DoD faced the prospect of significant mergers and acquisitions in the defense industry as U.S. military operations in Afghanistan and Iraq wound down, and the country entered an era of budgetary austerity. Thus the Department s guidance was designed to avoid a period of large-scale consolidation like the one that resulted from the peacetime defense cuts in the 1990s (following the so-called Last Supper meeting between DoD and industry) while recognizing that, in an environment of fiscal restraint and shrinking demand, some further sub-tier consolidation was warranted. In the years since the DoD guidance was issued, there has been a gradually increasing trend toward consolidation in the defense and aerospace sector, with the GenCorp/Aerojet acquisition of Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne in 2012, the ATK/Orbital merger in 2014, and a growing number of second tier defense hardware and defense service sector mergers and acquisitions. While several of these acquisitions raised challenging horizontal and vertical integration issues under the antitrust laws and were subjected to detailed investigation by the U.S. antitrust authorities (in cooperation with DoD), in the end they were not challenged based on the application of antitrust rules to the relevant facts and circumstances. It is in this context that Lockheed Martin, the nation s largest defense contractor, announced in June 2015 its intention to acquire Sikorsky, the leading U.S. producer of helicopters for military and commercial applications. Somewhat surprisingly, the Justice Department cleared the transaction in late September 2015 without issuing a so-called second request under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act (HSR Act), which allows Justice to fully investigate the impact of the proposed acquisition. DoD s New Guidance and Its Implications The key points made by DoD in its new guidance are set forth below along with some initial thoughts on their implications for the industry. Post-Lockheed-Sikorsky, It Is Not Open Season for Parties to Undertake Large, Prime Level Defense Mergers. At its heart, the DoD guidance makes it clear that the Department stands by its earlier guidance that it looks unfavorably on future mergers among top tier defense firms. In other words, the approval of the large Lockheed Martin-Sikorsky deal without a full investigation under the HSR Act (i.e., a so-called second request requesting supplemental information from the parties) should not be read as changing the pre-existing DoD policy. Indeed, if a statement like this had not been issued soon, numerous observers in the industry may have viewed the expeditious U.S. government approval of the transaction as a policy change especially coming on the heels of the approval of the ATK/Orbital transaction last year. Thus, the DoD statement is designed to reject that view.
3 Other Mergers Subject to Case-by-Case Review. Moreover, in the absence of any new guidance, the preexisting DoD guidance on non-prime mergers still stands namely, that DoD will review acquisitions of mergers between subsystem or service firms case by case based on traditional antitrust principles. Similarly, while the DoD guidance focuses on mergers among primes, there is no clear indication that prime level firms acquisitions of subsystem suppliers or other small and medium businesses are subject to a negative policy tilt. These types of acquisitions are part of normal market processes and can be pro-competitive in many situations. Thus, these cases will continue to be assessed on a case-by-case basis under the antitrust laws. Consolidation Trend as the Driving Force of DoD s Unfavorable View of Prime Level Mergers. DoD also made it clear that the trend toward fewer and larger prime contractors is what underlies its policy. As DoD stated, this consolidation has the potential to affect innovation, limit the supply base, pose entry barriers to small, medium and large businesses and ultimately reduce competition resulting in higher prices to be paid by the American taxpayer in order to support our warfighters. Indeed, the ultimate Department concern, expressed in the guidance, is that [i]f the trend to smaller and smaller numbers of weapon system prime contractors continues, one can foresee a future in which the Department has at most two or three very large suppliers for all the major weapons systems that we acquire. The Department would not consider this to be a positive development and the American public should not either. Secretary Carter made similar comments when he stated that [i]t was important to avoid excessive consolidation in the defense industry to the point where we did not have multiple vendors which could compete with one another on many programs. Acquisitions Like Lockheed/Sikorsky Raise Significant Policy Concerns Beyond the Antitrust Laws. While DoD was careful to state its view that the Lockheed/Sikorsky transaction does not trigger anti-trust concerns under existing law, it also clearly signaled that it approved the transaction begrudgingly and would have preferred a deeper investigation (i.e., a second request under the HSR Act) in order to fully examine the significant policy concerns raised by these types of transactions. Such a second request typically involves submitting, to the relevant antitrust agency handling the transaction (Justice of the FTC), a substantial volume of documents by parties to the transaction. DoD Concerns Over the Power of Large, Dominant Contractors. In particular, what rings through the DoD statement is a strong concern that the creation of a contractor that is dominant in a number of markets will be adverse to competition among primes across the board. In this regard, DoD observed that the Lockheed/Sikorsky transaction is the most significant change at the weapon system prime level since the large scale consolidation that followed the end of the cold war. This acquisition moves a high percentage of the market share for an entire line of products military helicopters into the largest defense prime contractor, a contractor that already holds a dominant position in high performance fixed wing aircraft due to the F-35 winner take all approach adopted over a decade ago. Mergers such as this, combined with significant financial resources of the largest defense companies, strategically position the acquiring companies to dominate large parts of the defense industry. (Emphasis added.) Needless to say, these are telling comments about a merger that had been approved reflecting the extent of DoD s concerns. With Size Comes Power. At the heart of DoD s concern is its view that [w]ith size comes power, and the Department s experience with large defense contractors is that they are not hesitant to use this power for corporate advantage. (Emphasis added). This striking sentence reflects an underlying view that such size (as apparently measured by the share of contracts a firm holds in product lines) would not be benign in nature and would strongly incentivize firms to act anti-competitively. Moreover, while unstated by DoD, it could be argued that certain acquisitions could create an industrial structure inherently adverse to competition even if a large, powerful firm does not directly use its power to adversely affect competition. For example, if a single prime level defense
4 contractor had the lion s share of contracts across a range of product areas, consider whether a subsystem supplier would be willing to team with a competing prime for the next award even if the dominant prime did not directly object or demand exclusivity. Interestingly, the statement also implies a concern that DoD s position as the sole buyer in many of these industries may not be sufficient countervailing market power to control such large firms. DoD s Concerns Over the Large Size and Broad Power Are on the Edge of Existing Antitrust Authority. For a number of reasons, it is difficult to utilize the existing antitrust laws to challenge the type of significant policy concern that DoD has expressed about transactions like Lockheed/Sikorsky. o First, the antitrust laws focus on the impact of a transaction on competition in a particular relevant market or markets. The antitrust agencies evaluate the horizontal effects (i.e., does the merger result in undue concentration and market power of the parties in that particular market) and the vertical effects on the supplier base in that market. In this regard, for example, the Lockheed/Sikorsky transaction does not raise the traditional types of horizontal consolidation issues found in mergers (i.e., because it is not a merger between two competing helicopter prime contractors). Rather, the transaction was vertical in nature (i.e., between Sikorsky, a helicopter prime, and Lockheed, which supplied subsystems for helicopters). Vertical mergers may raise greater concerns in the defense industry than in other markets since concern with preserving innovation rather than pricing issues may be paramount. Nevertheless, the reality is that few mergers have been prohibited on grounds of anticompetitive vertical integration because anticompetitive effects are difficult to prove and there may be more demonstrable efficiencies. In this case, while Justice apparently reviewed whether the combined company s power to deny Lockheed s subsystem capabilities to other helicopter firms would be anti-competitive (i.e., whether other reasonable substitutes were unavailable), this theory apparently did not offer a sufficient basis for a second request. o Second, the antitrust laws generally have not been successfully invoked to challenge mergers solely on the basis of the size or financial resources of a firm or its ability to leverage its position in some markets to create a competitive advantage in other markets. Bigness is not necessarily bad under the antitrust laws unless it can be shown that the combined firm will acquire actual market power that will allow it to dominate or maintain dominance in a particular product market. In practice, challenges to so-called conglomerate mergers (i.e., between firms that are not direct competitors or do not have supply relationships) have been rarely mounted, particularly in recent years, and have been largely unsuccessful. Early antitrust theories that conglomerate mergers may entrench the position of a dominant firm in the market for example through increased financial resources have largely been eliminated by the U.S. antitrust agencies as a basis to challenging non-horizontal mergers. o Third, while the Clayton Act prohibits mergers whose effect may be substantially to lessen competition, or to tend to create a monopoly in a product market (emphasis added), in practice the U.S. antitrust authorities and the courts tend to require hard evidence that a merger is actually likely to lessen competition and create anticompetitive effects. In short, a policy concern, even significant, that a vertical or conglomerate merger will create an industrial structure not conducive to competition generally would not cut it. Rather, it is apparently the view of the antitrust agencies (the Justice Department and the FTC) that any such adverse competitive effects can be addressed after the fact. That is, the antitrust agencies can directly attack exclusivity agreements, or tying or reciprocity arrangements to the extent they constitute unreasonable restraints of trade under the antitrust laws outside of the merger context.
5 While the FTC has the authority to, and has in practice examined national security considerations under its public interest standard in a number of defense transactions, it has relied on such considerations only as the basis to clear acquisitions otherwise found to be anti-competitive. Existing laws do not provide any national security or public interest basis for challenging transactions that otherwise do not raise specific antitrust concerns. In sum, while it may be possible that these types of claims could be brought in the context of a particular transaction, the challenges to such claims under the existing antitrust laws generally would be significant in light of the prevailing precedents and practice. DoD s Request for Additional Legislation. In light of the limitations of existing antitrust law, DoD stated that it is convinced that we should work with Congress to explore additional legal tools and policy to preserve the diversity and spirit of innovation that have been central to the health and strength of our unique, strategic defense industrial base, particularly at the prime contractor level. Under Secretary Kendall has suggested the idea of adding national security considerations into the antitrust law to address these issues, and noted that his staff is working on developing policy alternatives. The Nature and Prospects of Additional Legislation Remains to Be Seen. Whether and to what extent Congress will seriously consider any expanded authority to challenge mergers on the basis of significant national security concerns remains to be seen. Several preliminary observations are set forth below: o Public Debate is Likely. First, a robust public discussion on this proposal is expected and indeed, it has already begun. Some may argue that there are cogent reasons for limiting the authority to block mergers to the traditional boundaries of the antitrust law and some may raise concerns over affording DoD meaningful discretion in this area. o Standards and Processes Will Be Central Issues. Second, even if Congress were to accede to DoD s views, a number of questions would arise in crafting any such legislation. These issues include the breadth of DoD authority (i.e., what standards would apply and guide or bound its exercise of national security discretion) and whether DoD would have independent authority to investigate or block acquisitions on such grounds (i.e., outside the normal antitrust procedures managed by the U.S. antitrust agencies under the HSR Act). o Enhancement of Additional Non-Merger Tools to Address Industrial Base Concerns. Another question is whether DoD should sharpen and better utilize policy tools outside the merger review context to address whether there is sufficient competition in the defense industrial structure to provide innovative and affordable weaponry. Thus, for example, it is possible that industrial base issues and other policy concerns could be more systematically considered in shaping major acquisition strategies. Similarly, specific applications of market power e.g., through exclusivity arrangements could be forbidden before the fact or (if necessary) challenged on antitrust grounds after the fact. * * * In sum, the new DoD guidance authoritatively answers the question of whether the recent U.S. decision not to challenge the Lockheed/Sikorsky deal on antitrust grounds signals a change in DoD policy toward prime level mergers. Clearly, DoD continues to look unfavorably on such mergers. At the same time, DoD, working with the U.S. antitrust agencies, will also continue to review other mergers and acquisitions in the defense industry on a case-by-case basis in accordance with traditional standards (i.e., with no adverse policy tilt). Finally, the new DoD guidance now has opened
6 the door to a broader debate over whether additional authority is needed for circumstances where DoD has policy concerns about such mergers but no existing legal authority to challenge them. About the Author A Partner in the law firm of Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP, Jeff Bialos works on a wide range of aerospace and defense matters, including mergers, acquisitions, joint venture, and other collaborative activities, antitrust, international legal and regulatory matters, export controls, industrial security, government contracts, and public policy issues. He advises firms and Boards of Directors on these issues. Mr. Bialos served in the U.S. government in several capacities, including most recently as Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Industrial Affairs and was awarded the Department of Defense Distinguished Public Service Medal for his service. Mr. Bialos has authored and co-authored numerous articles and co-authored several books on national security and international legal and policy topics. Mr. Bialos received his J.D. degree from the University of Chicago Law School, a Master s degree in Public Policy from the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University, and an A.B. in history, magna cum laude, from Cornell University s College of Arts and Sciences.
U.S. Combat Aircraft Industry, : Structure, Competition, Innovation
SUMMARY A RAND research effort sponsored by the Office of the Secretary of Defense examined the future of the U.S. fixed-wing military aircraft industrial base. Its focus was the retention of competition
More informationIS STANDARDIZATION FOR AUTONOMOUS CARS AROUND THE CORNER? By Shervin Pishevar
IS STANDARDIZATION FOR AUTONOMOUS CARS AROUND THE CORNER? By Shervin Pishevar Given the recent focus on self-driving cars, it is only a matter of time before the industry begins to consider setting technical
More informationReport to Congress regarding the Terrorism Information Awareness Program
Report to Congress regarding the Terrorism Information Awareness Program In response to Consolidated Appropriations Resolution, 2003, Pub. L. No. 108-7, Division M, 111(b) Executive Summary May 20, 2003
More informationTrends in the Defense Industrial Base. Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Manufacturing and Industrial Base Policy
Trends in the Defense Industrial Base Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Manufacturing and Industrial Base Policy March 29 th, 2017 Importance of the defense industrial base Our margin
More informationCRS Report for Congress
95-150 SPR Updated November 17, 1998 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Cooperative Research and Development Agreements (CRADAs) Wendy H. Schacht Specialist in Science and Technology
More informationDMSMS Management: After Years of Evolution, There s Still Room for Improvement
DMSMS Management: After Years of Evolution, There s Still Room for Improvement By Jay Mandelbaum, Tina M. Patterson, Robin Brown, and William F. Conroy dsp.dla.mil 13 Which of the following two statements
More informationPublic Hearings Concerning the Evolving Intellectual Property Marketplace
[Billing Code: 6750-01-S] FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION Public Hearings Concerning the Evolving Intellectual Property Marketplace AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice of Public Hearings SUMMARY:
More informationA New Way to Start Acquisition Programs
A New Way to Start Acquisition Programs DoD Instruction 5000.02 and the Weapon Systems Acquisition Reform Act of 2009 William R. Fast In their March 30, 2009, assessment of major defense acquisition programs,
More informationThe Ubiquity and Limits of Competition Policy in a World of Flux
The Ubiquity and Limits of Competition Policy in a World of Flux Pablo Ibáñez Colomo London School of Economics and College of Europe Chillin Competition GCLC, 12 th Annual Conference Features of dynamic
More informationAppointment of External Auditors
Appointment of External Auditors This paper is for: Recommendation: Decision The Governing Body is asked to note the report and agree that a specialised Audit Panel be set up for the selection of the CCG
More informationFSIC FRANCHISE. Frequently asked questions
Frequently asked questions FSIC FRANCHISE 1. What are the details of the announced transaction? FS Investments ( FS ) and KKR Credit ( KKR ) announced an agreement to form a partnership to provide investment
More informationTextron Reports Third Quarter 2018 Results; Narrows Full-Year EPS and Cash Guidance
Corporate Communications Department NEWS Release Textron Reports Third Quarter 2018 Results; Narrows Full-Year EPS and Cash Guidance $468 million returned to shareholders through share repurchases Completed
More informationCOMMERCIAL INDUSTRY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT BEST PRACTICES Richard Van Atta
COMMERCIAL INDUSTRY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT BEST PRACTICES Richard Van Atta The Problem Global competition has led major U.S. companies to fundamentally rethink their research and development practices.
More informationThe seventh M&A wave. Marcos Cordeiro SEPTEMBER, 2014
SEPTEMBER, 2014 The seventh M&A wave Marcos Cordeiro The history of mergers and acquisitions is probably as long as commerce itself, and it is difficult to determine a date for the first case of a merger
More informationConfirms 2013 Financial Guidance
Confirms 2013 Financial Guidance PROVIDENCE, R.I.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Jul. 17, 2013-- Textron Inc. (NYSE: TXT) today reported second quarter 2013 income from continuing operations of $0.40 per share, compared
More informationHamilton Loeb. Washington, D.C. Practice Areas. Admissions. Languages. Education. Partner, Litigation Department
Hamilton Loeb Partner, Litigation Department hamiltonloeb@paulhastings.com Hamilton Loeb is a partner in the Litigation practice of Paul Hastings and is based in the firm s Washington, D.C., office. His
More informationHow To Draft Patents For Future Portfolio Growth
For the latest breaking news and analysis on intellectual property legal issues, visit Law today. www.law.com/ip Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law.com Phone: +1 646
More informationDynamics of National Systems of Innovation in Developing Countries and Transition Economies. Jean-Luc Bernard UNIDO Representative in Iran
Dynamics of National Systems of Innovation in Developing Countries and Transition Economies Jean-Luc Bernard UNIDO Representative in Iran NSI Definition Innovation can be defined as. the network of institutions
More informationGuidelines on Standardization and Patent Pool Arrangements
Guidelines on Standardization and Patent Pool Arrangements Part 1 Introduction In industries experiencing innovation and technical change, such as the information technology sector, it is important to
More informationOpen Systems Architecture in DoD Acquisition: Opportunities and Challenges
Open Systems Architecture in DoD Acquisition: Opportunities and Challenges Mr. Stephen P. Welby Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Systems Engineering (DASD(SE)), OUSD(AT&L) Defense Daily 6 th Annual
More informationCharles River Associates Annual Conference 8 December 2010, Brussels Opening address: The interplay between law and economics
Charles River Associates Annual Conference 8 December 2010, Brussels Opening address: The interplay between law and economics Alexander ITALIANER Director General Directorate General for Competition European
More informationCOUNCIL OF EUROPE COMMITTEE OF MINISTERS. RECOMMENDATION No. R (89) 5 OF THE COMMITTEE OF MINISTERS TO MEMBER STATES
COUNCIL OF EUROPE COMMITTEE OF MINISTERS RECOMMENDATION No. R (89) 5 OF THE COMMITTEE OF MINISTERS TO MEMBER STATES CONCERNING THE PROTECTION AND ENHANCEMENT OF THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL HERITAGE IN THE CONTEXT
More informationTextron Reports Second Quarter 2014 Income from Continuing Operations of $0.51 per Share, up 27.5%; Revenues up 23.5%
Textron Reports Second Quarter 2014 Income from Continuing Operations of $0.51 per Share, up 27.5%; Revenues up 23.5% 07/16/2014 PROVIDENCE, R.I.--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Textron Inc. (NYSE: TXT) today reported
More informationIt recently published its results. It cited four commonly heard complaints with the DOD business environment. Those were
Competition is good, and so is innovation. Having more contractors willing to sell to the Pentagon addresses both of those goods. Having more nontraditional contractors willing to sell to the Pentagon
More informationRe: Examination Guideline: Patentability of Inventions involving Computer Programs
Lumley House 3-11 Hunter Street PO Box 1925 Wellington 6001 New Zealand Tel: 04 496-6555 Fax: 04 496-6550 www.businessnz.org.nz 14 March 2011 Computer Program Examination Guidelines Ministry of Economic
More informationThomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology INTRODUCTION TO SCIENCE POLICY Program of Studies
Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology INTRODUCTION TO SCIENCE POLICY Program of Studies Standards Benchmarks Indicators 1. Students will demonstrate an understanding of the fundamental
More informationLoyola University Maryland Provisional Policies and Procedures for Intellectual Property, Copyrights, and Patents
Loyola University Maryland Provisional Policies and Procedures for Intellectual Property, Copyrights, and Patents Approved by Loyola Conference on May 2, 2006 Introduction In the course of fulfilling the
More informationEVCA Strategic Priorities
EVCA Strategic Priorities EVCA Strategic Priorities The following document identifies the strategic priorities for the European Private Equity and Venture Capital Association (EVCA) over the next three
More informationContinuous Competition as an Approach to Maximize Performance
Approved for Public Release: 12-3233. Distribution Unlimited. The Limits of Competition in Defense Acquisition Keywords: acquisition, competition, contracting, down-select, source selection Continuous
More informationexceptional circumstance:
STATEMENT OF ANALYSIS OF DETERMINATION OF EXCEPTIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES FOR WORK PROPOSED UNDER THE SOLID STATE ENERGY CONVERSION ALLIANCE (SECA) PILOT PROGRAM For the reasons set forth below, the Department
More informationCACI INTERNATIONAL INC /DE/
CACI INTERNATIONAL INC /DE/ FORM 8-K (Unscheduled Material Events) Filed 8/8/2005 For Period Ending 8/8/2005 Address 1100 N GLEBE ST ARLINGTON, Virginia 22201 Telephone 703-841-7800 CIK 0000016058 Industry
More informationOther Transaction Authority (OTA)
Other Transaction Authority (OTA) Col Christopher Wegner SMC/PK 15 March 2017 Overview OTA Legal Basis Appropriate Use SMC Space Enterprise Consortium Q&A Special Topic. 2 Other Transactions Authority
More informationFact Sheet IP specificities in research for the benefit of SMEs
European IPR Helpdesk Fact Sheet IP specificities in research for the benefit of SMEs June 2015 1 Introduction... 1 1. Actions for the benefit of SMEs... 2 1.1 Research for SMEs... 2 1.2 Research for SME-Associations...
More informationAN OVERVIEW OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT SYSTEM
AN OVERVIEW OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT SYSTEM (Note: Significant changes in United States patent law were brought about by legislation signed into law by the President on December 8, 1994. The purpose
More informationPresentation to NAS Committee on IP Management in Standards-Setting Processes. Dan Bart President and CEO Valley View Corporation November 4, 2011
Presentation to NAS Committee on IP Management in Standards-Setting Processes Dan Bart President and CEO Valley View Corporation November 4, 2011 Who is Dan Bart? Current Chairman of the ANSI IPR Policy
More informationStrategic Patent Management: An Introduction
Memoranda on legal and business issues and concerns for multiple and business communities Strategic Patent Management: An Introduction 1 Rajah & Tann 4 Battery Road #26-01 Bank of China Building Singapore
More informationU.S. Patent-Antitrust Interface. Alden F. Abbott, Heritage Foundation Oxford Competition Law Centre June 28, 2014
U.S. Patent-Antitrust Interface Alden F. Abbott, Heritage Foundation Oxford Competition Law Centre June 28, 2014 Introduction My thesis is that antitrust law has gradually weakened U.S. patent rights in
More informationTextron Reports Third Quarter 2014 Income from Continuing Operations of $0.57 per Share, up 62.9%; Revenues up 18.1%
Textron Reports Third Quarter Income from Continuing Operations of $0.57 per Share, up 62.9%; Revenues up 18.1% 10/17/ PROVIDENCE, R.I.--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Textron Inc. (NYSE: TXT) today reported third
More informationFrom the Experts: Ten Tips to Save Costs in Patent Litigation
The Business Implications of High Stakes Litigation: Process, Players, and Consequences From the Experts: Ten Tips to Save Costs in Patent Litigation By Joseph Drayton Reprinted with Permission About the
More informationDedicated Technology Transition Programs Accelerate Technology Adoption. Brad Pantuck
Bridging the Gap D Dedicated Technology Transition Programs Accelerate Technology Adoption Brad Pantuck edicated technology transition programs can be highly effective and efficient at moving technologies
More informationGerald G. Boyd, Tom D. Anderson, David W. Geiser
THE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM USES PERFORMANCE MEASURES FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY TO: FOCUS INVESTMENTS ON ACHIEVING CLEANUP GOALS; IMPROVE THE MANAGEMENT OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY; AND, EVALUATE
More informationConvention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW) Meeting of Experts on Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems (LAWS) April 2016, Geneva
Introduction Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW) Meeting of Experts on Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems (LAWS) 11-15 April 2016, Geneva Views of the International Committee of the Red Cross
More informationTECHNOLOGY INNOVATION LEGISLATION HIGHLIGHTS
LEGISLATION AND POLICY Since 1980, Congress has enacted a series of laws to promote technology transfer and to provide technology transfer mechanisms and incentives. The intent of these laws and related
More informationBoston University School of Law Transactional LawMeet -Information Session - September 15, 2015
Boston University School of Law Transactional LawMeet -Information Session - September 15, 2015 Transactional Law Program Transactional Law Program spearheads BU Law s participation in Transactional LawMeet
More informationTechnology transactions and outsourcing deals: a practitioner s perspective. Michel Jaccard
Technology transactions and outsourcing deals: a practitioner s perspective Michel Jaccard Overview Introduction : IT transactions specifics and outsourcing deals Typical content of an IT outsourcing agreement
More informationGuidelines to Promote National Integrated Circuit Industry Development : Unofficial Translation
Guidelines to Promote National Integrated Circuit Industry Development : Unofficial Translation Ministry of Industry and Information Technology National Development and Reform Commission Ministry of Finance
More informationEstablishing a Development Agenda for the World Intellectual Property Organization
1 Establishing a Development Agenda for the World Intellectual Property Organization to be submitted by Brazil and Argentina to the 40 th Series of Meetings of the Assemblies of the Member States of WIPO
More informationAttorney Business Plan. Sample 3
Attorney Business Plan 3 Attorney Business Plan 3 I have been a trial lawyer in Denver for nearly 25 years, the last seven serving as the first-chair litigator at Denver office. At, I have been in charge
More informationThe Future of Growth and the Energy Industry
The Future of Growth and the Energy Industry July 20, 2017 Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. 1 Our Speakers Steve Toon Editor in Chief Oil and Gas Investor Kevin Schroeder National Managing Partner,
More information"Competition Policy and Intellectual Property Rights in the Republic of Latvia since 1991" (the working title)
"Competition Policy and Intellectual Property Rights in the Republic of Latvia since 1991" (the working title) Research Proposal for the Doctoral Course at the "Ostsee-Kolleg: Baltic Sea School Berlin",
More informationIn this first of a series of MVision Insights, we commissioned research from the London Business School into the participation of women in the US
In this first of a series of MVision Insights, we commissioned research from the London Business School into the participation of women in the US venture capital business. Our aim is to stimulate a debate
More informationLexis PSL Competition Practice Note
Lexis PSL Competition Practice Note Research and development Produced in partnership with K&L Gates LLP Research and Development (R&D ) are under which two or more parties agree to jointly execute research
More informationJean W. Frydman Partner
Jean W. Frydman Partner Princeton, NJ Tel: 609.895.6630 Fax: 609.896.1469 jfrydman@foxrothschild.com A former general counsel for multinational pharmaceutical companies and a multinational retail dietary
More information11th Annual Patent Law Institute
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY Course Handbook Series Number G-1316 11th Annual Patent Law Institute Co-Chairs Scott M. Alter Douglas R. Nemec John M. White To order this book, call (800) 260-4PLI or fax us at
More informationProfessional Security Corporation
United States Government Accountability Office Washington, DC 20548 Decision Comptroller General of the United States DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
More informationSubmission to the Productivity Commission inquiry into Intellectual Property Arrangements
Submission to the Productivity Commission inquiry into Intellectual Property Arrangements DECEMBER 2015 Business Council of Australia December 2015 1 Contents About this submission 2 Key recommendations
More informationLAW. SERVICE. YOU. Join the FH+H team LAW. SERVICE.
YOU. Join the FH+H team FH+H is actively recruiting exceptional, experienced attorneys to join our firm as counsels or partners. We seek individuals who share our passion for the practice of law, our legal
More informationI. INTRODUCTION A. CAPITALIZING ON BASIC RESEARCH
I. INTRODUCTION For more than 50 years, the Department of Defense (DoD) has relied on its Basic Research Program to maintain U.S. military technological superiority. This objective has been realized primarily
More informationUnited States Small Business Administration Office of Hearings and Appeals
Cite as: Matter of Accent Services Co., Inc., SBA No. BDP-421 (2011) United States Small Business Administration Office of Hearings and Appeals IN THE MATTER OF: Accent Services Co., Inc., Petitioner SBA
More informationAustralian Census 2016 and Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA)
http://www.privacy.org.au Secretary@privacy.org.au http://www.privacy.org.au/about/contacts.html 12 February 2016 Mr David Kalisch Australian Statistician Australian Bureau of Statistics Locked Bag 10,
More informationIn the quarter, Textron returned $344 million to shareholders through share repurchases, compared to $186 million in the first quarter of 2017.
Corporate Communications Department NEWS Release Textron Reports First Quarter 2018 Income from Continuing Operations of $0.72 per Share; Signs Agreement to Sell Tools & Test Business for $810 Million
More informationINVESTMENT IN COMPANIES ASSOCIATED WITH NUCLEAR WEAPONS
INVESTMENT IN COMPANIES ASSOCIATED WITH NUCLEAR WEAPONS Date: 12.12.08 1 Purpose 1.1 The New Zealand Superannuation Fund holds a number of companies that, to one degree or another, are associated with
More informationSubject: Oil & Natural Gas Industry Response to Request for Public Comments on Section 232 National Security Investigation of Imports of Aluminum
Submitted via Aluminum232@bis.doc.gov 23 June 2017 Brad Botwin Director, Industrial Studies, Office of Technology Evaluation Bureau of Industry and Security U.S. Department of Commerce 1401 Constitution
More informationEnergy Trade and Transportation: Conscious Parallelism
Energy Trade and Transportation: Conscious Parallelism DRAFT Speech by Carmen Dybwad, Board Member, National Energy Board to the IAEE North American Conference Mexico City October 20, 2003 Introduction
More informationAntitrust & Competition
Antitrust & Competition Mayer Brown s multi-disciplinary Antitrust & Competition team offers a seamless, coordinated service throughout the Asia Pacific region, and has the benefit of extensive regional
More informationKING STUBB & KASIVA ADVOCATES & ATTORNEYS COMPETITION LAW. Solving disputes quickly and efficiently
KING STUBB & KASIVA ADVOCATES & ATTORNEYS COMPETITION LAW Solving disputes quickly and efficiently C o m p e t i t i o n L a w - King, Stubb & Kasiva has a full-fledged Competition Law Practice Group and
More informationGENEVA COMMITTEE ON DEVELOPMENT AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY (CDIP) Fifth Session Geneva, April 26 to 30, 2010
WIPO CDIP/5/7 ORIGINAL: English DATE: February 22, 2010 WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERT Y O RGANI ZATION GENEVA E COMMITTEE ON DEVELOPMENT AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY (CDIP) Fifth Session Geneva, April 26 to
More informationBuilding Wealth and Prosperity in the Communities We Call Home
Building Wealth and Prosperity in the Communities We Call Home Executive Summary EDA exclusively represents the equity capital market interests for the retail and institutional operations of middle market
More informationPROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE IN CURRENT STRUCTURAL DESIGN
Pg. 1 PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE IN CURRENT STRUCTURAL DESIGN Facts: Engineer A is involved in the design of the structural system on a building project in an area of the country that experiences severe weather
More informationITI Comment Submission to USTR Negotiating Objectives for a U.S.-Japan Trade Agreement
ITI Comment Submission to USTR-2018-0034 Negotiating Objectives for a U.S.-Japan Trade Agreement DECEMBER 3, 2018 Introduction The Information Technology Industry Council (ITI) welcomes the opportunity
More informationPan-Canadian Trust Framework Overview
Pan-Canadian Trust Framework Overview A collaborative approach to developing a Pan- Canadian Trust Framework Authors: DIACC Trust Framework Expert Committee August 2016 Abstract: The purpose of this document
More informationIV/10. Measures for implementing the Convention on Biological Diversity
IV/10. Measures for implementing the Convention on Biological Diversity A. Incentive measures: consideration of measures for the implementation of Article 11 Reaffirming the importance for the implementation
More informationPreservation Costs Survey. Summary of Findings
Preservation Costs Survey Summary of Findings prepared for Civil Justice Reform Group William H.J. Hubbard, J.D., Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Law University of Chicago Law School February 18, 2014 Preservation
More informationElectrical Products Group Conference
Electrical Products Group Conference Scott C. Donnelly Chairman, President and CEO Forward-Looking Information Certain statements in today s discussion will be forward-looking statements, including those
More informationGE OIL & GAS ANNUAL MEETING 2016 Florence, Italy, 1-2 February
GE OIL & GAS ANNUAL MEETING 2016 Florence, Italy, 1-2 February Value creation and partnership in a challenging business environment Harry Brekelmans Projects and Technology Director Royal Dutch Shell 2016
More informationTextron Reports First Quarter 2016 Income from Continuing Operations of $0.55 per Share, up 19.6%; Reaffirms 2016 Financial Outlook
Textron Reports First Quarter 2016 Income Continuing Operations of $0.55 per Share, up 19.6%; Reaffirms 2016 Financial Outlook April 20, 2016 06:30 AM Eastern Daylight Time PROVIDENCE, R.I.--(BUSINESS
More informationMedia and Information Literacy - Policies and Practices. Introduction to the research report Albania
Media and Information Literacy - Policies and Practices Introduction to the research report Regional conference Novi Sad, 23 November 2018 This paper has been produced with the financial assistance of
More informationEconomic and Social Council
United Nations Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 11 February 2013 Original: English Economic Commission for Europe Sixty-fifth session Geneva, 9 11 April 2013 Item 3 of the provisional agenda
More informationYour SBIR Data Rights and How to Protect Them
Your SBIR Data Rights and How to Protect Them Jere W. Glover Executive Director Small Business Technology Counsel Seidman & Associates, P.C. 923 15 th Street, NW Washington, DC 20005 202-662-9700 202-737-2368
More informationCase No COMP/M BANCO SANTANDER / ABBEY NATIONAL. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 15/09/2004
EN Case No COMP/M.3547 - BANCO SANTANDER / ABBEY NATIONAL Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 15/09/2004
More informationUNCTAD Ad Hoc Expert Meeting on the Green Economy: Trade and Sustainable Development Implications November
UNCTAD Ad Hoc Expert Meeting on the Green Economy: Trade and Sustainable Development Implications 8-10 November Panel 3: ENHANCING TECHNOLOGY ACCESS AND TRANSFER Good morning Ladies and Gentlemen. On behalf
More informationGlobalisation increasingly affects how companies in OECD countries
ISBN 978-92-64-04767-9 Open Innovation in Global Networks OECD 2008 Executive Summary Globalisation increasingly affects how companies in OECD countries operate, compete and innovate, both at home and
More informationClinical Commissioning Groups: Basic decision making around delegation
briefing January 2013 Clinical Commissioning Groups: Basic decision making around delegation To delegate, or not to delegate? That is the question. If only it were that simple. The question is not whether
More informationLearning adjustment speeds and inertia in the cycle of discovery A case study in Defence-related State / industry / academic research interaction
Learning adjustment speeds and inertia in the cycle of discovery A case study in Defence-related State / industry / academic research interaction D.W. Versailles & V. Mérindol Research center of the French
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Exelon Corporation ) ) Docket No. EC05-43-000 Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc. ) Affidavit of Richard W. LeLash on behalf of
More informationCross-Service Collaboration Yields Management Efficiencies for Diminishing Resources
Cross-Service Collaboration Yields Management Efficiencies for Diminishing Resources By Jay Mandelbaum, Tina M. Patterson, Chris Radford, Allen S. Alcorn, and William F. Conroy dsp.dla.mil 25 Diminishing
More informationGLOBAL RISK AND INVESTIGATIONS JAPAN CAPABILITY STATEMENT
GLOBAL RISK AND INVESTIGATIONS JAPAN CAPABILITY STATEMENT CRITICAL THINKING AT THE CRITICAL TIME ABOUT US The Global Risk and Investigations Practice (GRIP) of FTI Consulting is the leading provider of
More informationThe Policy Content and Process in an SDG Context: Objectives, Instruments, Capabilities and Stages
The Policy Content and Process in an SDG Context: Objectives, Instruments, Capabilities and Stages Ludovico Alcorta UNU-MERIT alcorta@merit.unu.edu www.merit.unu.edu Agenda Formulating STI policy STI policy/instrument
More informationCase 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 05/03/16 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0/0/ Page of ROBERT E. BELSHAW (SBN ) 0 Vicente Street San Francisco, California Telephone: () -0 Attorney for Plaintiff American Small Business League UNITED STATES DISTRICT
More informationThe 45 Adopted Recommendations under the WIPO Development Agenda
The 45 Adopted Recommendations under the WIPO Development Agenda * Recommendations with an asterisk were identified by the 2007 General Assembly for immediate implementation Cluster A: Technical Assistance
More informationDRAFT AGENDA. OECD/Korean Policy Centre. Workshop on Merger Review Procedures and Joint Ventures. MOFCOM - Beijing, 25 June 2014
DRAFT AGENDA OECD/Korean Policy Centre Workshop on Merger Review Procedures and Joint Ventures MOFCOM - Beijing, 25 June 2014 9.00 09.40 Opening Remarks and Introduction of the OECD/Korea Policy Centre
More informationNed Abelson. Director. Accolades. Boston:
Ned Abelson Director nabelson@goulstonstorrs.com Boston: +1 617 574 4082 Ned Abelson is a nationally recognized environmental lawyer who is known for his expertise in Brownfields redevelopment, transactional
More informationChapter IV SUMMARY OF MAJOR FEATURES OF SEVERAL FOREIGN APPROACHES TO TECHNOLOGY POLICY
Chapter IV SUMMARY OF MAJOR FEATURES OF SEVERAL FOREIGN APPROACHES TO TECHNOLOGY POLICY Chapter IV SUMMARY OF MAJOR FEATURES OF SEVERAL FOREIGN APPROACHES TO TECHNOLOGY POLICY Foreign experience can offer
More informationEnayat Qasimi. Partner. Experience M Street, NW Suite 450N Washington, DC Phone: Fax:
2018 Whiteford, Taylor & Preston LLP Enayat Qasimi Partner 1800 M Street, NW Suite 450N Washington, DC 20036 Phone: 202.659.6792 Fax: 202.327.6174 Email: eqasimi@wtplaw.com Experience Mr. Qasimi?s practice
More informationModule 1 - Lesson 102 RDT&E Activities
Module 1 - Lesson 102 RDT&E Activities RDT&E Team, TCJ5-GC Oct 2017 1 Overview/Objectives The intent of lesson 102 is to provide instruction on: Levels of RDT&E Activity Activities used to conduct RDT&E
More informationPolicy Perspective: The Current and Proposed Security Framework
Policy Perspective: The Current and Proposed Security Framework Ms. Kristen Baldwin, DASD(SE) August 16, 2016 05/10/16 Page-1 Outline Design as critical method to addressing trust/assurance We have a new
More informationINNOVATION PERFORMANCE REVIEW OF ARMENIA Chapter 2: National Innovation System and Innovation Governance
INNOVATION PERFORMANCE REVIEW OF ARMENIA Chapter 2: National Innovation System and Innovation Governance Presentation by Rumen Dobrinsky European Alliance for Innovation Eighth session of the UNECE Committee
More informationTrade Secret Protection of Inventions
Trade Secret Protection of Inventions Phil Marcoux & Kevin Roe Inventions - Trade Secret or Patent? Theft by employees, executives, partners Theft by contract Note - this class does not create an attorney-client
More informationLEGAL MEMORANDUM. The SBA Regulations Implementing the NDAA 2013 Amendments
www.outlooklaw.com LEGAL MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: File Christine V. Williams SUBJECT: New SBA Regulations--June 2016 Executive Summary: The SBA Regulations Implementing the NDAA 2013 Amendments Final sweeping
More informationGender pay gap reporting tight for time
People Advisory Services Gender pay gap reporting tight for time March 2018 Contents Introduction 01 Insights into emerging market practice 02 Timing of reporting 02 What do employers tell us about their
More information