Proceedings. of the 19th Aerospace Testing Seminar. Sponsored by. Technology and The Aerospace Corporation

Transcription

1 Proceedings of the 19th Aerospace Testing Seminar October 2-5,2000 Manhattan Beach, California ^"JK*. axb^. Sponsored by Institute of Environmental Sciences Technology and The Aerospace Corporation Space and Missile Systems Center

2 CONTENTS Planning Group ii SESSION 1: FASTER, BETTER, CHEAPER LESSONS LEARNED William Raynor, Naval Research Laboratory James Haughton, Kinetic Research Corporation 1-1 Manufacturing's Role in Aerospace Box Testing, by J. P. Holub and M. S. Yoss Testing Issues During the USAF Space Test Program's ARGOS Satellite Development, by D.D. Chism, M. La Grassa, M.N. Lovellette, A. Quintero, and J. D. White Lunar Prospector: Faster, Better, Cheaper Lessons Learned, by K. Foster and T. Maloney COTS-Based Satellite Ground Control Systems: One USAF Unit's Experience, by Col R. D. Monfort 21 SESSION 2: INDUSTRY TESTING STANDARDS MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR MISSION SUCCESS Al Peterson, The Aerospace Corporation Doug Miller, USAF Space and Missile Systems Center 2-1 Orbital Sciences Environmental Test Standards, by K. L. Leith and P. A. Larkin Avoidance of Unverified Failures, byb.a. Sande Functional Test Requirements as Illustrated by the USAF Space Test Program's ARGOS Satellite Development, by D. D. Chism, M. La Grassa, M. N. Lovellette, A. Quintero, and J. D. White PayloadAccommodation in the Faster, Better & Cheaper Environment, by N. G. Heinsohn, T. Girard, and C. Kloss 59 SESSION 3: RISK MANAGEMENT IN THE FASTER, BETTER, CHEAPER TEST ENVIRONMENT Richard Moloney, The Boeing Company John Wang, The Boeing Company 3-1 Risk Management vs. Risk Acceptance, by D. D. Chism, M. La Grassa, M. N. Lovellette, A. Quintero, and J. D. White What are the Human Limits to a "Faster, Better, Cheaper" Management Approach? by D. C. Johannsen 3-3 Applying the Test Like You Fly Principle, by D. L. Shelton and S. C. Roskie v

3 3-4 Construction and Activation ofa Centaur High Energy Upper Stage Fluid Systems Integration Lab, by J. Schlank Managing Risk for Thermal Vacuum Testing of the International Space Station Radiators, by J. A. Carek, D. E. Beach, and K. L. Remp Predicting the Time to Perform Satellite Level Test, by B. Arnheim Production Defect Precursors to On-Orbit Satellite Anomalies, by A. V.Rubin 144 SESSION 4: INTEGRATING TEST, MODELING, AND SIMULATION FOR BEST VALUE Tom Baca, Sandia National Laboratories Lalit Sharma, The Boeing Company 4-1 Using Test and Analysis to Drive Design, by M.Baker Environmental Testing Philosophyfor a Sandia National Laboratories' Small Satellite Project A Retrospective, by J. S. Cap Model and Test Effectiveness Study in Europe: Interim Results, by P. Messidoro, M. Bader, and R. Roumeas Damage-Based Analysis Tool for Flight Vibroacoustic Data, by S.Rubin Supersonic Turbine Nozzle Flow Measurements, by T. V. Ferguson and R. D. McGlynn A New Predictive Methodology for Launch Vehicle Fill Factors, by P. A. Manning Test-Based Simulation Bridges the Gap Between Test and CAEfor Spacecraft Vibro-Acoustics, by C. Kaminsky and G. Borello Object-OrientedApproaches to Faster, Bettter, Cheaper Testing, by D. C. McShan 233 SESSION 5: TESTING METHODOLOGIES, INNOVATIONS, AND CHALLENGES IN THE FBC ENVIRONMENT Bruce Axnheim, The Aerospace Corporation Gary Pluckhan, Lockheed Martin Space Systems 5-1 Intensive Rate Satellite Productions: A Clear Success in the Recent Past, An Ambitious Challenge for the Next Future, by A. Casola, A. Iannarelli, and A. Pullara The Microtest Method to Address Test Cycle Time Reduction for Increased Complexity Spacecraft Requiring Multivariant Testing, by M. Mickelson 259 vi

4 5-3 X-38 Cost Reduction Through Early Testing, byb.h. Wendler 5-4 Definition ofrosetta Thermal Vacuum Test on the Basis of Test Effectiveness Considerations, by P. Maggiore. G. Raimondo, and V. Barboni Multipurpose Data Acquisition System for the Space Simulation Laboratory at Lockheed Martin Astronautics, by L. W. Mason and P. M. Samar Advanced Prototype Approaches Reduction of Cost and Time to Orbit (ACTOR), by P. Giordano, R. Roumeas, and J-M. Franzin Acoustic and Vibration Testing of Spacecraft Using a Common Facility, byh.u.hamid Quick Buckling Strength Estimate for Compound Columns, by L. Leguizamo, J. S. Mills, and W. Tsui Follow On Validation of Force-Limited Vibration Testing, byd. S.Kaufman and D.B.Worth Enhanced Computer Controlled Atlas Pressurization System (CCAPS) Verification, by R. J. Blanyer An Innovative Acoustic Test Methodfor the Faster, Better, Cheaper Environment, byra.larkin 361 POSTER SESSION Joseph Pope, The Aerospace Corporation Daniel Kaufman, Orbital Sciences Corporation P-1 Vibroacoustic Intelligent System for Predicting Environments, Reliability, and Specifications (VISPERS), by K. B. Bradford and J. R Manning 371 P-2 Network Sensor Systems The Pressure Belt Application, by F. Gen-Kuong and B. Swanson 379 P-3 Application of a Microelectronic Thermal Imaging System to Measurement of Thermal Radiationfrom a Launch Vehicle Nozzle, by R. Ferro, G. To, P. Yee, T. Hsieh, and H. Deacon 391 P4 Design, Development, and Test of a Graphite Epoxy Strutfor Use in a Launch Vehicle Payload Truss Adaptor, by M. Dew, M. Smith, D. Johnson, and P. Netelbeek 398 P-5 An Overview of the Use ofthe Laser Dynamic Range Imager (LDRI)for Measurement of Space Station Structural Dynamics, by G.H. James 399 vii

5 6 Failure Mode Verification Testing (FMVT) Using a New 6-DOF Testing Machine, by A. J. Porter A Government Alliance to Improve Management and Utilization of NASA and DOD Space Environmental Simulation Chambers and Acoustic Testing Facilities, by R. P. Kozar and G. R. Mattasits Using MSC/Nastran and LMS/Pretest to Find an Optimal Sensor Placement for Modal Identification and Correlation ofaerospace Structures, by T. Van Langenhove and M. Brughmans 427 vin