Downloaded from jipm.irandoc.ac.ir at 12:53 IRST on Friday March 8th 2019

Transcription

1 : 5-8 () 5-8 () ISC SCOPUS L ISA : alaee6@gmailcom. nnaghsh@ut.ac.ir. taherismster@gmailcom. The European Patent Office (esp@cenet): United States Patent and Tradmark Office (USPTO): 5. Japan Patent Office (JPO) 6. World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO): 7. Web of Science 90/05/9 : * 89/08/0 : : WoS (..).. WoS. 95 0/ /5 :

2 (85 ).. ( )

3 : ) - " " ( (86 )..(OECD 00, 0). (UIS). 05

4 7 9.. (UIS)..... (8) (8).. (87). (007-00) (88).. Unesco Institute for Statistics (UIS) wwwuisunescoorg : Measuring Research and Experimental Development, Central Asian seminar-workshop on Science, Technology and Innovation indicators: Trends and challenges, Almaty, Kazakhstan 7-9 November (Canberra manual) 06

5 :. ( ) 8. 60/.(Eisenschitz, Lazard, and Willey 986) 5/7 9..(Breschi, Lissoni, and Montobbio 005) Branstetter )..(00.(Bernardes et al. 006) ) Ĥ. (.(Meyer 00) Bio-Nexus 07

6 7 9 ( ) Web of Science. : ( Web of ( Science ( ( (5.. 08

7 :. WoS ).. ( Web of Science WoS ( ) 09

8 7 9 ( ) (Li et al. 007) / 8. 9% 8% % % 00% ( 8) USPTO EPO JPO WIPO. 9 ( ) () quadruplet. Skewness. Narin. Oppenheim 5. Karki 00

9 :.(85 ) ( ).-5 WoS. ) 990 Web of Science (. : ( WoS WoS ( ( 6/5 ) 58 ( 9. 7/ ( ) WoS.. " " 0

10 7 9. ( ).. M=6 WoS WoS WoS 58 MD=.. 0

11 : Web of. (5 ).-5 :..(Meyer 00).(Okubo 997).. 00 Science :.. Correlations Between Scientific Papers and Patents UIS.. 0

12 ( ) /6. 95 WoS 8.. / 8 96/ 8.. R=0/09.( ) 0/95. Correlations Spearman's rho patent paper Correlation Coefficient Sig. (-tailed) N Correlation Coefficient Sig. (-tailed) N patent paper (00 ). 0

13 : patent paper.. 6/ non- patent researchers 05

14 7 9. ( ) US in JPO US in EP O EP C in US EP C in JPO 907 JPO in US 57 JPO in EP O IR in :. 06

15 :

16 ISI. ISI

17 : (88 ).... " "

18 ( ) (GDP) (GFCF)... ( ). ( ) :.. Gross domestic products. Gross fixed capital formation.. Patentometrics.. 050

19 : :().. : :(8)..85..(88/0/0 ) :. ( ) : (5) ( ).8. :.(98-00) (Patent) (ISI) : :. Bacchiocchi E., ad F. Montobbio F. 00. EPO vs. USPTO citation lags. CESPRI working paper, n. 6 (working paper). ftp://ftp.unibocconi.it/pub/repec/cri/papers/wp6montobbio.pdf (accessed 0 March 00). Balconi, M., Stefano Breschi, and Francesco Lissoni. 00. Networks of inventors and the role of academia: an exploration of Italian patent data. Research Policy (): 7-5. Bernardes, A. T., R. M. Ruiz, L. C. Ribeiro, and E. M. Albuquerque Modelling economic growth fuelled by science and technology. Belo Horizonte: UFMG/Cedeplar. Branstetter, L. 00. Is the academic science driving a surge in industrial innovation? Evidence from patent citations. (accessed 9 April 00). Breschi, S., F. Lissoni, and F. Montobbio The scinetific productivity of academic inventors: new evidence from italian data. (accessed 9 April 00). Durack, Katherine T.00. Research opportunities in the us patent record. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 5. (accessed 9 April 00). 05

20 7 9 Eisenschitz, T. S., A. M. Lazard, and C. J. Willey Patent groups and their relationship with journal literature. Journal of Information Science (5). /5 (accessed 9 April 00). European Commission Second European Report on S&T Indicators. Bruxelles: European Commission. Karki, M. M Patent citation analysis: a policy analysis tool. World Patent Information 9 (): Kowalski, T. J., A. Maschio, and Samuel H. Megerditchian. 00. Dominating global intellectual property: Overview of patentability in the USA, Europe and Japan. Journal of Commercial Biotechnology 9 (): 05-. Kurtossy, J. 00. Innovation indicators derived from patent data. Periodica Polytechnica Ser. Soc. Man. Sci. (): 9 0. Leydesdorrf, loet. 00. The challenge of Scientometrics; the development, measurement, and selforganization of scientific communication. Boca Raton: Universal publisher. Li, Xin, Yiling Lin, Hsinchun Chen, and Mihail C. Roco Worldwide nanotechnology development: A comparative study of USPTO, EPO, and JPO patents (976-00). Journal of Nanoparticle Research 9 (6): Lo, S.-C. 00. A study of the productivity of genetic engineering research from 99 to 00 using the patentometrics approach. In International Workshop on Webometrics, Informetrics and Scientometrics, Roorkee IND, , 0-6. Roorkee: Central Library, Indian Institute of Technology. Lo, S.-C Linkage between public science and technology development of genetic engineering: Preliminary study on patents granted to Japan, Korea and Taiwan. In International Workshop on Webometrics, Informetrics and Scientometrics, Nancy FRA, Nancy FRA: COLLNET Meeting. Meyer, M. S. 00. Patent citation analysis in a novel field of technology: An exploration of nano-science and nano-technology. Scientometrics 5 (): 6-8. OECD. 99. Patent manual. (accessed 9 April 00). OECD. 00. Frascati manual: Proposed standard practice for surveys on research and experimental development. Paris: OECD pub. OECD Compendium of patent statistics. Paris: OECD pub. Okubo, Y Bibliometrics indicators and analysis of research systems: methods and examples. Paris: OECD pub. Oppenheim, C Do patent citations count? In The web of knowledge. B. Cromin and H. B. Atkins (eds), 05-. Medford: Information Today, Inc. Schaaper. M Measuring research and experimental development. In Central Asian seminarworkshop on science, technology and innovation indicators: Trends and challenges, Almaty, Kazakhstan. 7-9 November. Montreal: Unesco Institute for Statistics. [Workshop ppt file] (accessed 0 April 00). WIPO WIPO patent report: Statistics on worldwide patent activities. World Intellectual Property Organization. (accessed 0 April 00). 05

21 Iranian Research Institute Iranian For Science and Technology ISSN 5-8 eissn 5-8 Indexed in LISA, SCOPUS & ISC Vol.7 No. pp: 0-05 summer 0 Science and Technology Output Indicators in the Islamic Republic of Iran: A Case Study on the Relevance between Patents and Scientific Products of Iranian Inventors Mohamad Alaee Arani* MA in Human Sciences Faculty, Kashan University Nader Naghshineh Assistant Professor of Library and Information Science, Tehran University Sayyed Mahdi Taheri Faculty Member of Islamic Sciences and Culture Academy Abstract: The output of scientific products represents the efforts of scientific and industrial communities. The study on this output shows scientific attitudes and approaches of a community towards world of science. Quantitative studies can give a representation of the size and extent of the scientific efforts of researchers in special occasions, or a particular society. Patents are one of these important outputs. In this study, the names of Iranian inventors were extracted by carrying a combined search and the analysis of patent data available through Europe Patent Office (EPO), the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), Japan Patent Office (JPO), and the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) databases. Inventors amount of scientific products were also evaluated by using citation indexes in Thompson Reuters (formerly ISI) Web of Science. Content analysis research method was adopted. Results of this study reported no significant correlation was found between scientific output and patent application. Findings also indicated a 6.5 percent contribution of patent researcher in comparison with non-patent researchers of Iranian indexed articles by Web of Science. Keywords: patents, scientific productivity, Iranian inventors, United State Patent and Trademark Office, Europe Patent Office, Japan Patent Office, World Intellectual Property Organization *Corresponding author: alaee6@gmail.com. nnaghsh@ut.ac.ir. taherismster@gmail.com xii