What s a Counter Plateau. An introduction for the muon Lab

Similar documents
Physics Experiment N -17. Lifetime of Cosmic Ray Muons with On-Line Data Acquisition on a Computer

Coincidence Rates. QuarkNet. summer workshop June 24-28, 2013

Scintillators as an external trigger for cathode strip chambers

EKA Laboratory Muon Lifetime Experiment Instructions. October 2006

LIFETIME OF THE MUON

Cosmic Ray Muon Detection

Testing the Electronics for the MicroBooNE Light Collection System

Instructions for gg Coincidence with 22 Na. Overview of the Experiment

The (Speed and) Decay of Cosmic-Ray Muons

Cosmic Ray Detector Hardware

PH2510 Nuclear Physics Laboratory Use of Scintillation Counters (NP5)

and N(t) ~ exp(-t/ ),

NEEP 427 PROPORTIONAL COUNTERS. Knoll, Chapters 6 & 14 Sect. I & II

Recommissioning the Qweak Drift Chambers Using a Cosmic-Ray Telescope

PARTICLE DETECTORS (V): ELECTRONICS

Final Report Data Acquisition Box

Contents. Why waveform? Waveform digitizer : Domino Ring Sampler CEX Beam test autumn 04. Summary

Positron Emission Tomography

GAMMA-GAMMA CORRELATION Latest Revision: August 21, 2007

The optimal cosmic ray detector for High-Schools. By Floris Keizer

Chemistry 985. Some constants: q e 1.602x10 19 Coul, ɛ x10 12 F/m h 6.626x10 34 J-s, c m/s, 1 atm = 760 Torr = 101,325 Pa

Ph 3324 The Scintillation Detector and Gamma Ray Spectroscopy

Detecting and Suppressing Background Signal

Electronic Instrumentation for Radiation Detection Systems

An ASIC dedicated to the RPCs front-end. of the dimuon arm trigger in the ALICE experiment.

Fast first practical help -- detailed instructions will follow- preliminary Experiment F80

COMPENDIUM OF FRONT-END ELECTRONICS

Cosmic Rays in MoNA. Eric Johnson 8/08/03

K 223 Angular Correlation

ILC Prototype Muon Scintillation Counter Tests

The software and hardware for the ground testing of ALFA- ELECTRON space spectrometer

Digital coincidence acquisition applied to portable β liquid scintillation counting device

ORTEC. Research Applications. Pulse-Height, Charge, or Energy Spectroscopy. Detectors. Processing Electronics

Gamma Ray Spectroscopy with NaI(Tl) and HPGe Detectors

Investigation of a Cs137 and Ba133 runs. Michael Dugger and Robert Lee

Physics Laboratory Scattering of Photons from Electrons: Compton Scattering

On the initiation of lightning in thunderclouds (Instrumentation, Supplementary information)

ANTICOINCIDENCE LOW LEVEL COUNTING

MuLan Experiment Progress Report

Two Slit Interference, One Photon at a Time

ORTEC. Time-to-Amplitude Converters and Time Calibrator. Choosing the Right TAC. Timing with TACs

Test and Simulation of Plastic Scintillator Strips readout by Silicon Photomultipliers

A CMOS INTEGRATED CIRCUIT FOR PULSE-SHAPE DISCRIMINATION*

Silicon Photomultiplier Evaluation Kit. Quick Start Guide. Eval Kit SiPM. KETEK GmbH. Hofer Str Munich Germany.

ATMOSPHERIC NUCLEAR EFFECTS

A high-performance, low-cost, leading edge discriminator

EXPERIMENT 5. SCINTILLATION COUNTING AND QUENCH CORRECTION.

Study of Resistive Plate Chambers Scintillation detectors and Reconstruction of muon tracks in RPCs

Overview 256 channel Silicon Photomultiplier large area using matrix readout system The SensL Matrix detector () is the largest area, highest channel

DETECTORS Important characteristics: 1) Wavelength response 2) Quantum response how light is detected 3) Sensitivity 4) Frequency of response

Investigation of effects associated with electrical charging of fused silica test mass

Digital trigger system for the RED-100 detector based on the unit in VME standard

Simulation of Algorithms for Pulse Timing in FPGAs

The High-Voltage Monolithic Active Pixel Sensor for the Mu3e Experiment

Cosmic Rays with LOFAR

CAEN. Electronic Instrumentation. CAEN Silicon Photomultiplier Kit

A Modular Readout System For A Small Liquid Argon TPC Carl Bromberg, Dan Edmunds Michigan State University

PHYSICS ADVANCED LABORATORY I COMPTON SCATTERING Spring 2002

Construction of a Spark Chamber for Public Demonstration

CHAPTER 9 POSITION SENSITIVE PHOTOMULTIPLIER TUBES

Radiation Detection Instrumentation

Trigger and Data Acquisition (DAQ)

Use of a Hybrid Photo Detector (HPD) in the MAGIC micro power LIDAR system

Traditional analog QDC chain and Digital Pulse Processing [1]

Indoor Location Detection

The Digital Oscilloscope and the Breadboard

Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope (GLAST) Large Area Telescope (LAT) ACD Gain Calibration Test with Cosmic Ray Muons

Goal of the project. TPC operation. Raw data. Calibration

Characterization of New-Generation Silicon Photomultipliers for Nuclear Security Applications

AMS-02 Anticounter. Philip von Doetinchem I. Physics Institute B, RWTH Aachen Bad Honnef, August 2007

PMT tests at UMD. Vlasios Vasileiou Version st May 2006

CCD reductions techniques

High granularity scintillating fiber trackers based on Silicon Photomultiplier

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS OF THE GEIGER COUNTER

AN ABSTRACT ON THE THESIS OF. David C. Vasquez for the degree of Master of Science in Radiation Health Physics presented on February 26, 2010.

QuarkNet Cosmic Ray Detection System Manual

Physics 3 Lab 5 Normal Modes and Resonance

INDEX. Firmware for DPP (Digital Pulse Processing) DPP-PSD Digital Pulse Processing for Pulse Shape Discrimination

MITOCW watch?v=sozv_kkax3e

4: EXPERIMENTS WITH SOUND PULSES

8.882 LHC Physics. Detectors: Muons. [Lecture 11, March 11, 2009] Experimental Methods and Measurements

LHCb Preshower(PS) and Scintillating Pad Detector (SPD): commissioning, calibration, and monitoring

Moderne Teilchendetektoren - Theorie und Praxis 2. Dr. Bernhard Ketzer Technische Universität München SS 2013

The Muon Detector Update

Silicon Photomultiplier

Figure 1-1. The ISIS Neutron Beam Monitor scintillator array. Operational Guide for the ISIS Neutron Beam Monitor

LABORATORY MANUAL FOR PHYSICS 180F

LUDLUM MODEL MODEL AND MODEL GAMMA SCINTILLATORS. June 2017

Amptek Inc. Page 1 of 7

Attenuation length in strip scintillators. Jonathan Button, William McGrew, Y.-W. Lui, D. H. Youngblood

Monte Carlo PMT Simulation

nanomca-sp datasheet I. FEATURES

Phosphor Decay Times of Iiyama HM204DT monitors

User Guide. SIB Channel MAPMT Interface Board Hamamatsu H7546 series

ORTEC. AN34 Experiment 14 Nuclear Lifetimes and the Coincidence Method. Equipment Needed from ORTEC. Equipment Required from Other Manufacturers

Application Note #4 Signal Recovery With Photomultiplier Tubes Photon Counting, Lock-In Detection, or Boxcar Averaging?

Long-term operation of a multi-channel cosmic muon system based on scintillation counters with MRS APD light readout

Tutors Dominik Dannheim, Thibault Frisson (CERN, Geneva, Switzerland)

ORTEC Experiment 13. Gamma-Gamma Coincidence with Angular Correlation. Equipment Required

EE119 Introduction to Optical Engineering Fall 2009 Final Exam. Name:

Transcription:

What s a Counter Plateau An introduction for the muon Lab

Counters have noise and signal If you are lucky, a histogram of the pulse heights of all the signals coming out of a photomultiplier tube connected to a particle detector may look like: Number of times you got that Pulse height Here s the noise Here s the signal A B C Pulse Height (in volts) If you were just interested in how many times you got a signal, it makes sense to try and count how many times you got a signal with a pulse height greater than that indicated by B on the x axis. Let s say you do just that. Count all the times there was a pulse with height greater than B volts. The point B then represents the threshold where counting starts.

If you now move this threshold around, and see how many times you get a pulse height greater that a certain value, you may see something like the plot on the right. There is a point around B again, where the number of counts is fairly flat as a function of the threshold you chose. In fact, it looks sort of like a plateau. The area where the number of counts is fairly insensitive to the place where you set a threshold to start counting signals, is generally called the Plateau. Number of times you got that Pulse height The plot on the right is more or less the integral of the plot on the left. Number of Counts A Plateau B C A Pulse Height (in volts) Threshold (in volts)

The Muon Lab Plateau -In the muon lab, you d like to try and find the correct place to plateau the counter. That s what setting the threshold and the Tube Gain are all about in the set up. You have to set the Tube Gain (This is controlled by a high voltage.) high enough so that the signal is at the very least greater than the minimum threshold of the discriminator (where the tube pulse is converted to a logic signal if the pulse height exceeds the threshold). But -There is a complication! Since you are looking at particles that stop (somewhere!) in the Scintillator part of the detector, the signal is not as pretty as in the idealized picture. -There is a complication! You are actually looking at 2 signals: the incoming muon, and the decay electron. -You need a better way to find the particle plateau. Consider: -Noise is supposed to be random. If you plot the time between random pulses, it looks like an exponential that decays as the noise rate. -The signature of a muon decay is 2 pulses, on average about 2.2 microseconds apart. If you plot the time between pulses from a muon decay,it looks like an exponential that decays as ~1/2.2 microseconds. -If you could just plot the noise rate, you d get the number of noise counts in a certain period of time. -BUT!!! If you plot just the signal rate, you d get a few every minute.

What rate is what? -The rate at which cosmic ray muon s arrive at the detector is more or less constant. -The rate at which we detect these muons is adjustable via the tube gain and the threshold voltage. We expect a few a minute. - But the rate at which muons decay is set by the physics -The rate at which we get random noise in the detector is adjustable via the tube gain and the threshold voltage. (Though there will be some irreducible (small) accidental noise due to getting more than one muon in the detector.) So, what we need to do in the setup, is to make sure the rate of noise and signal in the setup has the following properites: 1) Has to have a rate very different that the decay rate of the muon, or we won t be able to disentangle the the exponential from the noise and the muon decay 2) The noise has to have a rate much lower than the rate at which muon decays are detected. We want our data to be mostly signal! Bottom line: Get rid of the noise, save the signal.

Now you are ready to set up In the express set-up, the method to describe noise is detailed: Accidental Noise Rate ~ Count Rate*Count Rate (sum of time widths used for coincidence) And we might expect the following behavior in a detector dominated by accidental coincidences: The count rate is any time we got a signal above threshold in the discriminator. Sum of time widths Count rate While we might expect the following behavior in a detector with muon decays present, where we have tried to reduce the noise Sum of time widths Count Rate Mathematically, the Coincidences = Muons that decayed + Accidental Rate