Design and Implementation of PID Controller for Single Capacity Tank

Similar documents
Non Linear Tank Level Control using LabVIEW Jagatis Kumaar B 1 Vinoth K 2 Vivek Vijayan C 3 P Aravind 4

PID Controller Design for Two Tanks Liquid Level Control System using Matlab

Design of Model Based PID Controller Tuning for Pressure Process

IJESRT. Scientific Journal Impact Factor: (ISRA), Impact Factor: 1.852

Online Tuning of Two Conical Tank Interacting Level Process

CONTROLLER TUNING FOR NONLINEAR HOPPER PROCESS TANK A REAL TIME ANALYSIS

Relay Feedback based PID Controller for Nonlinear Process

Design and Simulation of Gain Scheduled Adaptive Controller using PI Controller for Conical Tank Process

Design of Fuzzy- PID Controller for First Order Non-Linear Liquid Level System

Simulation and Analysis of Cascaded PID Controller Design for Boiler Pressure Control System

LAMBDA TUNING TECHNIQUE BASED CONTROLLER DESIGN FOR AN INDUSTRIAL BLENDING PROCESS

Two-PI Controllers Based Quadruple Tank System

INTEGRATED PID BASED INTELLIGENT CONTROL FOR THREE TANK SYSTEM

Non-Integer Order Controller Based Robust Performance Analysis of a Conical Tank System

BINARY DISTILLATION COLUMN CONTROL TECHNIQUES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY

Modeling and Control of Liquid Level Non-linear Interacting and Non-interacting System

MODEL BASED CONTROL FOR INTERACTING AND NON-INTERACTING LEVEL PROCESS USING LABVIEW

EMPIRICAL MODEL IDENTIFICATION AND PID CONTROLLER TUNING FOR A FLOW PROCESS

Cohen-coon PID Tuning Method; A Better Option to Ziegler Nichols-PID Tuning Method

Various Controller Design and Tuning Methods for a First Order Plus Dead Time Process

AN EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF THE PERFORMANCE OF A PID CONTROLLED VOLTAGE STABILIZER

Some Tuning Methods of PID Controller For Different Processes

Performance Analysis of Conventional Controllers for Automatic Voltage Regulator (AVR)

Comparative Study of PID and Fuzzy Controllers for Speed Control of DC Motor

Auto-tuning of PID Controller for the Cases Given by Forbes Marshall

Embedded based Automation System for Industrial Process Parameters

PID TUNING WITH INPUT CONSTRAINT: APPLICATION ON FOOD PROCESSING

Assessment Of Diverse Controllers For A Cylindrical Tank Level Process

6545(Print), ISSN (Online) Volume 4, Issue 1, January- February (2013), IAEME & TECHNOLOGY (IJEET)

ISSN: X Impact factor: 4.295

Design of PID Controller for IPDT System Based On Double First Order plus Time Delay Model

SET POINT TRACKING CAPABILITY ANALYSIS FOR AN INDUSTRIAL IPDT PROCESS MODEL

Comparative Analysis of PID, SMC, SMC with PID Controller for Speed Control of DC Motor

Comparative Analysis of Controller Tuning Techniques for Dead Time Processes

FUZZY ADAPTIVE PI CONTROLLER FOR SINGLE INPUT SINGLE OUTPUT NON-LINEAR SYSTEM

Digital Control of MS-150 Modular Position Servo System

Spacecraft Pitch PID Controller Tunning using Ziegler Nichols Method

An Implementation for Comparison of Various PID Controllers Tuning Methodologies for Heat Exchanger Model

ADVANCES in NATURAL and APPLIED SCIENCES

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PID AND FUZZY CONTROLLER ON EMBEDDED COMPUTER FOR WATER LEVEL CONTROL

Temperature Control in HVAC Application using PID and Self-Tuning Adaptive Controller

TUNING OF PID CONTROLLERS USING PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION

VARIABLE STRUCTURE CONTROL DESIGN OF PROCESS PLANT BASED ON SLIDING MODE APPROACH

Neural Network Predictive Controller for Pressure Control

Design of an Intelligent Pressure Control System Based on the Fuzzy Self-tuning PID Controller

Review Paper on Comparison of various PID Controllers Tuning Methodologies for Heat Exchanger Model

Fuzzy Gain Scheduled PI Controller for a Two Tank Conical Interacting Level System

Application of Proposed Improved Relay Tuning. for Design of Optimum PID Control of SOPTD Model

Research Article Multi-objective PID Optimization for Speed Control of an Isolated Steam Turbine using Gentic Algorithm

Process controls in food processing

Experiment 9. PID Controller

Comparison Effectiveness of PID, Self-Tuning and Fuzzy Logic Controller in Heat Exchanger

Governor with dynamics: Gg(s)= 1 Turbine with dynamics: Gt(s) = 1 Load and machine with dynamics: Gp(s) = 1

A Comparative Study on Speed Control of D.C. Motor using Intelligence Techniques

Variable Structure Control Design for SISO Process: Sliding Mode Approach

An Introduction to Proportional- Integral-Derivative (PID) Controllers

TUNABLE METHOD OF PID CONTROLLER FOR UNSTABLE SYSTEM L.R.SWATHIKA 1, V.VIJAYAN 2 *

A Comparative Novel Method of Tuning of Controller for Temperature Process

Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey. 2 Chemical Engineering Department,

FORDYPNINGSEMNE FALL SIK 2092 Prosess-Systemteknikk. Project tittle: Evaluation of simple methods for tuning of PID-Controllers

Speed control of a DC motor using Controllers

Analysis of Transient Response for Coupled Tank System via Conventional and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) Techniques

Comparative Study of PID and FOPID Controller Response for Automatic Voltage Regulation

DC Motor Speed Control for a Plant Based On PID Controller

Comparative Analysis of a PID Controller using Ziegler- Nichols and Auto Turning Method

Labview Based Gain scheduled PID Controller for a Non Linear Level Process Station

Performance Analysis Of Various Anti-Reset Windup Algorithms For A Flow Process Station

Comparative Study of PID Controller tuning methods using ASPEN HYSYS

DC Motor Speed Control: A Case between PID Controller and Fuzzy Logic Controller

Closed-loop System, PID Controller

Design and Implementation of Self-Tuning Fuzzy-PID Controller for Process Liquid Level Control

Design of Self-Tuning Fuzzy PI controller in LABVIEW for Control of a Real Time Process

DEVELOPMENT OF MULTI INPUT MULTI OUTPUT COUPLED PROCESS CONTROL LABORATORY TEST SETUP

Keywords: Fuzzy Logic, Genetic Algorithm, Non-linear system, PI Controller.

A PID Controller Design for an Air Blower System

Position Control of a Hydraulic Servo System using PID Control

II. PROPOSED CLOSED LOOP SPEED CONTROL OF PMSM BLOCK DIAGRAM

PID Tuning Using Genetic Algorithm For DC Motor Positional Control System

Process Control Laboratory Using Honeywell PlantScape

IJSRD - International Journal for Scientific Research & Development Vol. 4, Issue 03, 2016 ISSN (online):

LABVIEW BASED TUNING OF PI CONTROLLERS FOR A REAL TIME NON LINEAR PROCESS

Relay Based Auto Tuner for Calibration of SCR Pump Controller Parameters in Diesel after Treatment Systems

Position Control of AC Servomotor Using Internal Model Control Strategy

EFFICIENT CONTROL OF LEVEL IN INTERACTING CONICAL TANKS USING REAL TIME CONCEPTS

New PID Tuning Rule Using ITAE Criteria

Load Frequency and Voltage Control of Two Area Interconnected Power System using PID Controller. Kavita Goswami 1 and Lata Mishra 2

CHBE320 LECTURE XI CONTROLLER DESIGN AND PID CONTOLLER TUNING. Professor Dae Ryook Yang

Comparison of Tuning Methods of PID Controllers for Non-Linear System

Further Control Systems Engineering

Simulink Based Model for Analysing the Ziegler Nichols Tuning Algorithm as applied on Speed Control of DC Motor

Design of PID Controller with Compensator using Direct Synthesis Method for Unstable System

DETERMINATION OF THE PERFORMANCE OF NEURAL PID, FUZZY PID AND CONVENTIONAL PID CONTROLLERS ON TANK LIQUID LEVEL CONTROL SYSTEMS

An Expert System Based PID Controller for Higher Order Process

Md. Aftab Alam, Dr. Ramjee Parsad Gupta IJSRE Volume 4 Issue 7 July 2016 Page 5537

TUNING OF PID CONTROLLER USING PSO AND ITS PERFORMANCES ON ELECTRO-HYDRAULIC SERVO SYSTEM

TWO AREA CONTROL OF AGC USING PI & PID CONTROL BY FUZZY LOGIC

PID control. since Similarly, modern industrial

Different Controller Terms

Tuning Methods of PID Controller for DC Motor Speed Control

ISSN Vol.04,Issue.06, June-2016, Pages:

Transcription:

Design and Implementation of PID Controller for Single Capacity Tank Vikas Karade 1, mbadas Shinde 2, Sagar Sutar 3 sst. Professor, Department of Instrumentation Engineering, P.V.P.I.T. Budhgaon, Maharashtra, India 1 sst. Professor, Department of Electronics Engineering, P.V.P.I.T. Budhgaon, Maharashtra, India 1 sst. Professor, Department of Instrumentation Engineering, M.P.C.O.E. Velneshwar, Maharashtra, India 1 BSTRCT: The industrial application for controlling of single capacity tank is widely used in almost all process industries and most commonly used in chemical industries. Controlling of single capacity tank by using PID controller is presented in this paper. In this paper, Ziegler Nichols method is used for setting the parameters of PID controller. Simulation is done by using identification toolbox of MTLB to check the performance of system. s the system is nonlinear, initially it becomes essential to linearise the process model and then PID controller is designed for the system. The best fit simulation results of actual process are 83.17, which are much encouraging. KEYWORDS: PID controller, Tuning of PID, Water level control I. INTRODUCTION Three Mode Controller (PID) is one of the most powerful but complex controller mode operations which combines proportional, Integral and derivative modes together. The PID Controller is invented in 1910 and the Ziegler-Nichols (Z-N) tuning method in 1942 [1]. Now days PID is widely used in various industries. By using PID we get output within minimum error and overshoot. Liquid level control plays important role in large scale industries like chemical and petrochemical industries. Nonlinear system PID controller is more beneficial than PI controller. PID controller offers simplest solutions for the real world problems. In level control applications, PID controls the level of liquid according to given set point and it is able to accept new set point value at the run time. For developing the control system it is necessary to develop mathematical model of the process. This paper considers designing PID controller for single capacity tank system using MTLB software. The organization of paper is as follows: Section II describes all related work done earlier. The mathematical model of single tank level control is given in Section III. In section IV the designing of PID controller, its mathematical representation and PID controller parameters using ZN method are presented. Experimental results are described in section V. Section VI deals with the conclusion. II. RELTED WORK In process industries, level control mechanism is extensively used. In process applications, it is required to pump the water into the tank and there are various methods used to tune the PID controller to find appropriate values of the parameters. Our system objective is to design PID controller to maintain the level in tank. The model considered to develop the system is as shown in figure 1. 1. Mostafa. Fellani et. al. has used PID, P, PI controller to control the liquid level. They did the simulation using MTLB, and the response of each controller is compared with PID by finding Rise time, settling time, steady state error and overshoot [6]. Copyright to IJIRSET DOI:10.15680/IJIRSET.2016.0511013 18898

2. Miral Changela, nkit Kumar in their paper stated that the liquid level in tank and flow between the tanks is more important in the process modelling. PID controller, fuzzy controller and the performance of both are compared for their systems [7]. 3. S. Janarthanan [8] et. al. used PID controller and fractional order PID controller in their work. They have designed the system for conical tank system. They presented different tunning methods to find the parameters of PID. 4. nca Maxim [9], et. al. used model based controller to multivariable process. IMC controller is used for MIMO system. The PID and IMC controller were tested in two experiments consisting in set points tracking and disturbance rejection. 5. Hur bbas [12], et. al. in their work they presented working model of coupled tanks. non linear model of SISO system is developed and simulation is carried out using MTLB. Performance of sliding mode control and PID controller is compared. III. MTHMTICL MODEL OF SYSTEM Figure 1 show the liquid level system which contains following parameters. Process Parameters: = Cross sectional area of tank (cm 2 ) a = Cross sectional area of outlet (cm 2 ) h = Water level (cm) K = Sensitivity of Pump V = Voltage to pump R 1 = Valve Settings Fig.1. Single tank system Modelling Process: Time Rate of Change = Rate of Rate of of Mass into the system Mass in low Mass Out low dh = a2gh + KV dt Copyright to IJIRSET DOI:10.15680/IJIRSET.2016.0511013 18899

Now, we should linearise the model around steady state operating point. Here the nonlinearity arises because of the term h By Taylors series of expansion method around steady state h s is given by For single tank Let, h = h + 1 2 h ( h h ) + dh dt = a 2g h + 1 2 h ( h h ) + KV T = a 2h g dh = f (h, V) dt Linear approximation of this equation can be obtained by Taylors series of expansion and truncating after first order system. The reference point for linearization is the normal steady state operating point (h, V, ) f (h, V) = fh, V, + f h (h h ) + f h (V V ) (1) But steady state corresponds to f (h, V, ) = 0 and deviation variables arises out of Taylors series of expansion. h = h h nd V = V V Let, Now, and dh dt = d dt (h h ) = f h h )h + f V V )V (2) a = h h and c = V a = f h h = h a a 2gh = g 2h c = f V V = KV V = K bove equation can be written as But d dt (h h ) = a g (h h 2h ) + K (V V ) (3) dx dt = a g x + K 2h u Copyright to IJIRSET DOI:10.15680/IJIRSET.2016.0511013 18900

So we can write above equation as Thus we get the state model T = a 2h g dx dt = 1 T x + K u x = x + Bu x = 1 T x + K u (4) nd Output y = Cx + Du y = K x + 0 (5) Equation (4) and (5) are the state model equations. Process Parameters = 66.242 cm 2 a= 3.14 cm 2 g = 981 cm K = 5.054 V = Voltage h = 1.4 IV. DESIGN OF PID CONTROLLER T = = 1.127 x = 1 T x + K u x = [ 0.886]x + [0.076]u (6) Obtain Transfer function from state space y = [0.5]x (7) G(s) = c[is ]. B + D G(s) = 0.038 S + 0.886 Ziegler Nichols Method is used for controller setting which is based on adjusting closed loop until steady state oscillations occur [3]. By Using Z-N Method nd 0.038K G(s) = S + 0.886 + 0.038K W = 0.886 Copyright to IJIRSET DOI:10.15680/IJIRSET.2016.0511013 18901

Following are the parameters of PID controller K = 13.98, T = 7.088, T = 1.772 V. EXPERIMENTL RESULTS Fig.2. Simulink model of system The Simulink model of single tank water level control system using PID controller for obtaining the step response is mentioned in figure 2. Here the Z-N method is used find the PID parameters. Transfer function in this system represents the mathematical model of single tank system. Fig.3 Simulation of step input Simulation results of liquid level control system with PID controller are shown in figure 3. Transfer function of a system is obtained after modelling of liquid system. Fig.4. PID Controller parameters Fig.5. Performance with PID controller Copyright to IJIRSET DOI:10.15680/IJIRSET.2016.0511013 18902

Figure 4 shows tunned and block parameters of PID controller. The performance parameters like rise time, settling time, overshoot, gain margin and closed loop stability etc were also mentioned in figure 4. Figure 5 represents the graphical representation of performance parameters of PID controller. PID controller gives good control over the process. 1 Step Response 0.9 0.8 mplitude 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Time (seconds) Fig.6.Step response of system For single tank system inlet flow rate is 80 LPH and step input given 90 LPH. The figure 6, Shows step input response of actual level system. Fig.7.Simulated model output Best fit graph of designed system is shown in figure 7. This is obtained by using MTLB identification tool box. The obtained best fit results are obtained from practical values. VI. CONCLUSION This paper presents a level controlling of single capacity tank by using PID controller. The system is linearise around a steady state and state space model is obtained. Z-N method is used to set the PID setting. Simulation was conducted within MTLB environment. The block parameters and tuned parameters are approximately same. Hence Copyright to IJIRSET DOI:10.15680/IJIRSET.2016.0511013 18903

it may be concluded that the PID controller is the most effective controller that eliminates the offset of the proportional mode and still provides fast response. This system gave us 83.17 % best fit. REFERENCES [1] J. Swder, G. Wszoek, W. Carvalho, Programmable Controller Design Electro pneumatic systems, Journal of Material Processing Technology 164-1655 (2005) 14659-1465 [2] William L. Luyben, Process Modelling, Simulation and Control for Chemical Engineers, Second Edition, Mc-Graw Hill publication [3] C. D. Johnson, Process Control Instrumentation Technology, Seventh Edition, Pearson Education, New Delhi 2003. [4] Dale E. Seborg, Thomas F. Edgar, Duncan. Mellichamp, Process Dynamics and Control, Second Edition, Willey Publication. Manual: ECON DT 9812. [5] G. Stepnopoulos, Chemical Process Control: n Introduction to Theory & Practice, Prentice Hall Of India. [6] Mostafa. Fellani, boubaker M. Gabaj, PID Controller Design for two tanks liquid level control system using MTLB, International journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vol. 5 No.3 June 2015,pp, 436-442. [7] Miral Changela, nkit Kumar, Designing of controller for two tank system, International Journal of Science and Research., ISSN 2319-7064. [8] S.Janarthanan, K.N.Thirukkuralkani, S.Vijayachitra, Performance nalysis of Non-Integer Order PID Controller for Liquid Level Control of Conical Tank System, IEEE, ISBN No.978-1-4799-3834-6/14 [9] nca Maxim, Clara M.Ionescu, Cosmin Copot, Robin De Keyser Multivariable Model-Based Control Strategies for Level Control in a Quadruple Tank Process, IEEE, 978-1-4799-2228-4/13. [10] W. Bequette, Process Control: Modeling, Design and Simulation, Prentice Hall Professional, 2003. [11] K. Ogata, Modern Control Engineering Fourth Edition, Pearson Publication. [12] Hur bbas, Sajjad sghar, Shahid Qamar, Sliding Mode Control For Coupled-Tank Liquid Level Control System 2012 10th International Conference on Frontiers of Information Technology, IEEE, 978-0-7695-4927-9/12 Copyright to IJIRSET DOI:10.15680/IJIRSET.2016.0511013 18904