ARCHAEOLOGICAL GEOPHYSICS: SENSOR SELECTION AND SITE SUITABILITY

Similar documents
7. Consider the following common offset gather collected with GPR.

Archaeo-Geophysical Associates, LLC

Applied Geophysics Nov 2 and 4

Ground Penetrating Radar Theory, Data Collection, Processing, and Interpretation: A Guide for Archaeologists

GPR Part II: Effects of conductivity. Surveying geometries. Noise in GPR data. Summary notes with essential equations. Some Case histories

SIMULATION OF GPR SCENARIOS USING FDTD

Ground Penetrating Radar (day 1) EOSC Slide 1

A Report on the Ground Penetrating Radar Survey 205 Little Plains Road Southampton, NY

Geophysical Survey Rock Hill Bleachery TBA Site Rock Hill, South Carolina EP-W EPA, START 3, Region 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page Signature

Ground Penetrating Radar

In search of a Historic Grave: GPR Investigation near the Yellowstone Lake Store: 7/15/2010

SIR, UtilityScan and RADAN are registered trademarks of Geophysical Survey Systems, Inc.

Results of GPR survey of AGH University of Science and Technology test site (Cracow neighborhood).

Report. Mearns Consulting LLC. Former Gas Station 237 E. Las Tunas Drive San Gabriel, California Project # E

Advanced Ground Investigation Techniques to Help Limit Risk or Examine Failure. Advanced Subsurface Investigations

The use of high frequency transducers, MHz, allowing the resolution to target a few cm thick in the first half meter suspect.

Electromagnetic Induction

GPR Data Acquisition and Interpretation

Geology 228/378 Environmental Geophysics Lecture 10. Electromagnetic Methods (EM) I And frequency EM (FEM)

Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) By Dr. Eng. Zubair Ahmed

Resolutionof Ground-penetrating Radar Reflections at Differing Frequencies

LAB 9: GROUND-PENETRATING RADAR

3D UTILITY MAPPING USING ELECTRONICALLY SCANNED ANTENNA ARRAY. Egil S. Eide and Jens F. Hjelmstad

November 13, Hindu Temple, LTD Arbor Street Omaha, Nebraska Attn: Subject:

Radar Methods General Overview

Electrical Resistivity Imaging

Seismic Reflection Method

GPR SURVEY METHOD. Ground probing radar

Advanced Utility Locating Technologies (R01B)

Estimation results on the location error when using cable locator

A COMPARISON OF ELECTRODE ARRAYS IN IP SURVEYING

Using GPR Technique Assessment for Study the Sub-Grade of Asphalt and Concrete Conditions

An acousto-electromagnetic sensor for locating land mines

Tri-band ground penetrating radar for subsurface structural condition assessments and utility mapping

EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF HYPERSTACKING FOR GPR SURVEYS. Abstract

Increasing the Probability of Detection and Evaluation of Buried Metallic Objects by Data Fusion GPR- Low Frequency Electromagnetic Sensor Array

RECONSTRUCTION OF BURIED OBJECTS BY IMPLEMENTATION OF GROUND PENETRATING RADAR TECHNIQUE: EXAMPLE ON ROMAN TOMB IN BRESTOVIK (SERBIA)

Case Studies and Innovative Uses of GPR for Pavement Engineering Applications

IMAGE FORMATION THROUGH WALLS USING A DISTRIBUTED RADAR SENSOR NETWORK. CIS Industrial Associates Meeting 12 May, 2004 AKELA

VALIDATION OF GROUND PENETRATING RADAR DATA INTERPRETATION USING AN ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVE PROPAGATION SIMULATOR

Archaeological geophysical instruments (conductivity, groundpenetrating

Understanding Seismic Amplitudes

The application of GPR for the modeling of ERT data and the evaluation of resolution for different electrode configurations

GPR MEASUREMENTS OF WATER LEVEL IN SILTY SOILS. Sandeep Pyakurel

ωκε ωκε 5.11 Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR)

Report on a Ground Penetrating Radar survey of Longyearbreen

Experiment on Artificial Frozen Soil Boundary GPR Detection During Cross-passage Construction in Tunnels

Environmental Quality and Installations Program. UXO Characterization: Comparing Cued Surveying to Standard Detection and Discrimination Approaches

Downloaded from library.seg.org by on 10/26/14. For personal use only. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2014

Detection of Obscured Targets: Signal Processing

SUBSURFACE MAPPING. Presenters: Thomas Kevin Hanna, PLS. Paul J. Emilius Jr., PLS CP

GROUND PENETRATING RADAR AND THE SURVEYOR w/ Case Studies

High Voltage Pylon earth Measurements. Tycom (Pty) Ltd Frank Barnes Comtest (Pty) Ltd Presented by Gavin van Rooy

3. Electromagnetic methods 3.1 Introduction

Pitfalls in GPR Data Interpretation: Differentiating Stratigraphy and Buried Objects from Periodic Antenna and Target Effects

Visual inspection and ground penetrating radar investigation of the historical Pulaski County Poor Farm Cemetery

L O C A T O R G P R. Introducing the. Radarteam. Ground Probing Radar/Antenna system with Rugged PC and Cart ü

ANALYSIS OF RADIO WAVE PROPAGATION IN SOIL WITH APPLICATION IN ARCHEOLOGY

GROUND PENETRATING RADAR (GPR)

Ground Parameters For Hams Do we have a problem and can we do something about it? Rudy Severns N6LF

Some Advances in UWB GPR

Resolution in evaluation of structural elements by using ground-penetrating radar.

1 of 11 30/08/2011 8:50 AM

GPR INVESTIGATION AT SAINT ADRIANO CHURCH, BRENNA (CO)

TOPIC 2 WAVEGUIDE AND COMPONENTS

SODAR- sonic detecting and ranging

Characterization of Dielectric Materials using Ring Resonators

Understanding the Importance of Ferrite Bead Material Behavior

High Voltage Pylon Earth Measurements

THE ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD THEORY. Dr. A. Bhattacharya

Metal Detector Description

University of KwaZulu-Natal

Estimaton of Rebar Diameter Using Ground Penetrating Radar

Novel Demagnetization Method after Magnetic Particle Testing

# DEFINITIONS TERMS. 2) Electrical energy that has escaped into free space. Electromagnetic wave

Chapter 12: Transmission Lines. EET-223: RF Communication Circuits Walter Lara

Exploration Beyond Expectation. Geo-Carte Radar Technology Pvt. Ltd.

ATS 351 Lecture 9 Radar

THE NATURE OF GROUND CLUTTER AFFECTING RADAR PERFORMANCE MOHAMMED J. AL SUMIADAEE

ELEC4604. RF Electronics. Experiment 1

Investigation of Bridge Decks Utilizing Ground Penetrating Radar

ESTIMATION OF REBAR DIAMETER IN CONCRETE STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS USING GROUND PENETRATING RADAR

Active and Passive Microwave Remote Sensing

MSP25. Mobile Sensor Platform

Using ground penetrating radar to quantify changes in the fracture pattern associated with a simulated rockburst experiment

GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SURVEYS ON RAILWAY SECTION BETWEEN MONTEVIDEO PASO DE LOS TOROS URUGUAY

Asset Protection Cathodic Protection Soil Resistivity Measurement. Work Instruction No.:

Microwave Remote Sensing (1)

TECHNICAL NOTE EXTREMELY LOW FREQUENCY (ELF) EM SYSTEM

GPR Investigation: Post Tension Cable Mapping

Digitization and fundamental techniques

Earth Sciences 089G Short Practical Assignment #4 Working in Three Dimensions

Surface Deployed / Ground Sensors

SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION USING GROUND PENETRATING RADAR (GPR) AND ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY TOMOGRAPHY TO LOCATE THE MACQUARIE PIER, NEWCASTLE.

Ground Penetrating Radar: Impulse and Stepped Frequency

Chapter 21. Alternating Current Circuits and Electromagnetic Waves

Estimating Debye Parameters from GPR Reflection Data Using Spectral Ratios

9 Moisture Monitoring

Chapter 15: Radio-Wave Propagation

Applications of Acoustic-to-Seismic Coupling for Landmine Detection

Transcription:

ARCHAEOLOGICAL GEOPHYSICS: SENSOR SELECTION AND SITE SUITABILITY A SPARC Webinar presented on October 17, 2014 Eileen G. Ernenwein, PhD ETSU: http://faculty.etsu.edu/ernenwei/ CAST: http://goo.gl/wyzlp 1 FUNDAMENTAL CONCEPTS IN ARCHAEOLOGICAL GEOPHYSICS Passive vs. active methods 1. Passive sensors only listen (e.g. magnetometry) 2. Active sensors generate their own signal and measure response (e.g. resistivity, GPR, EMI) 1

FUNDAMENTAL CONCEPTS IN ARCHAEOLOGICAL GEOPHYSICS Raster Vs. Vector Image source: http://outsidetheneatline.blogspot.com/ FUNDAMENTAL CONCEPTS IN ARCHAEOLOGICAL GEOPHYSICS Relative differences between target features and surrounding matrix Unwanted, random signals Spikes Radio interference static Data collection errors Image Source: http://www.sprawls.org/resources/imgchar/module/ 2

FUNDAMENTAL CONCEPTS IN ARCHAEOLOGICAL GEOPHYSICS Clutter unwanted signals from various sources such as: rodent burrows tree roots geological layers metal debris Lightning strikes Anything that could be confused with an archaeological signal. FUNDAMENTAL CONCEPTS IN ARCHAEOLOGICAL GEOPHYSICS Data Density number of readings per meter. 3

FUNDAMENTAL CONCEPTS IN ARCHAEOLOGICAL GEOPHYSICS Resolution ability to resolve detail. Can refer to data density or sensor s ability to detect small features. Spatial Resolution of the data = data density (aka sampling density) Resolution of the sensor = size of objects that can be detected Resolution of the recording device = precision of recorded values You cannot improve resolution after data collection. Therefore sampling strategy and instrument configuration and settings are critical. PRINCIPLES OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL GEOPHYSICS Detects Subsurface features without need for surface expression Large contiguous areas generally better than small ones Need contrast in order to detect features Limited to shallow depths (a few meters usually), resolution decreases with depth. Multiple methods are almost always better than one 4

OVERVIEW OF ELECTRICAL RESISTANCE 1. What property is measured? What fundamental property is being exploited so that archaeological features can be detected? 2. How is the property measured? Theoretical background. 3. How is the instrument configured for data collection? 4. What are the instrument s limits in terms of depth and resolution? 5. What are the method s advantages and disadvantages? ELECTRICAL RESISTANCE What property is measured? The degree to which a material resists the passage of an electrical current, measured in Ohms. strongly related to moisture RM15 Resistance Meter Army City, KS (ca. 1918) 40 m 5

ELECTRICAL RESISTANCE How is resistivity measured? Pass a current through a medium and measure it with a voltmeter. If the current (I) is kept constant and the voltage (V) is measured, resistance (R) can be calculated with Ohm s law: R = V/I Configurations: ELECTRICAL RESISTANCE Many options (Wenner, Schlumberger, etc.), but twin probe array most practical for archaeology. The Current (C) probes create a constant, known current that is sampled by the Potential (P) probes. Distance between mobile and remote probes must always be at least 30x the mobile probe separation. 6

ELECTRICAL RESISTANCE Depth: As probes in array are moved farther apart, targeted depth increases For twin probe array, depth = mobile probe separation. This is where measurement is focused, but features in immediate vicinity are also detected. Resolution: As probe separation increases, resolution decreases. This is because a larger volume of earth is measured, so the volume of features represents a smaller percentage of the sampled volume, making detection less likely. ELECTRICAL RESISTANCE Advantages Works well as long as there is moisture contrast ability to target different depths by changing probe separation not influenced by metal from pin flags, trash, shell casings, etc. Disadvantages: Slow compared to other methods Lower data density owing to slow rate of data collection. need to insert probes, so need soft soil and some surface moisture Somewhat bulky for travel 7

OVERVIEW OF EMI 1. What property is measured? What fundamental property is being exploited so that archaeological features can be detected? 2. How is the property measured? Theoretical background. 3. How is the instrument configured for data collection? 4. What are the instrument s limits in terms of depth and resolution? 5. What are the method s advantages and disadvantages? ELECTROMAGNETIC INDUCTION (EMI) What property is measured? Conductivity - How easily an electrical current will flow through a material (ms). inverse of resistivity, theoretically and Magnetic Susceptibility (ability of something to become magnetized) 8

EMI CONDUCTIVITY AND MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY How is it measured? EMI Advantages Works where resistivity does not more portable than resistivity MS more sensitive than magnetometry Disadvantages: generally less precise than resistivity less depth penetration than magnetometry (MS) 9

MAGNETOMETRY Depth & Resolution Ability to detect features depends on their magnetic properties and distance from sensor. A particular depth cannot be targeted. Depth usually uppermost 1-2 meters, but deeper for very large or strongly magnetic features. Strength of magnetic field falls off with third power of distance from sensor. So, if a features measures 1 nt when buried 1 m deep, would measure only.125 at 2 m deep (this is the limit of detection for most magnetometers) Half-width rule: width of an anomaly at half its max value equals either the depth of the feature, or its width if that number is greater. Better than nothing but not that reliable As a feature s depth increases, the change in magnetic measurements from the maximum value outward is more gradual. So, deeper anomalies will have more widely spaced isolines. Disadvantages: sensitivity to metal debris problem with igneous bedrock MAGNETOMETRY does not work as well if soils not well developed (e.g. deserts) andesite cobbles, but recent wall on right is visible, and interior wall of sunken temple (left) Pin flags culvert 10

MAGNETOMETRY NATURE S GIFT TO ARCHAEOLOGY Advantages Magnetometry is Nature s Gift to Archaeology Dr. Kenneth L Kvamme it is particularly sensitive to human actions on the landscape rapidly covers large areas, especially with multisensor carts Presidio Los Adaes 20 m CAUSES OF MAGNETIC VARIATION: MAGNETOTACTIC BACTERIA Certain soil microbes control the intracellular deposition of magnetite (Fe 3 0 4 ) or greigite (Fe 3 S 4 ) contributing to the formation of ferromagnetic materials and sources of soil/sediment magnetism. Magnetotactic bacteria (e.g., Magnetobacterium bavaricum) shown in a TEM photomicrograph 11

ACCUMULATION AND REMOVAL OF TOPSOIL Induced magnetism Example: Earthlodge at Double Ditch, ND (courtesy Ken Kvamme) BURNED/FIRED FEATURES Remanent magnetism Hearth Burned structure 12

STONE CONSTRUCTIONS What property is measured? Strength of reflections (in decibels, db) and the time it takes for radar pulses to transmit, reflect, and be received, usually measured in nanoseconds (ns; 1 ns = one billionth of a second). Wave velocity is inversely proportional to RDP RDP strongly controlled by moisture (increased moisture = increased RDP = decreased velocity). Also can be affected by magnetic permeability, but only in rare cases such as when iron or iron oxides are present in high concentrations. Strength of reflections depends on contrast between target and medium. ideal conditions = moderate contrast. If too strong, robust reflections can block deeper penetration (e.g. metal is a perfect reflector). If too weak, some features are invisible. 13

Reflection Refraction Transmission complicated ray-paths lost reflections multiples shielded vs. non-shielded antennas cone of illumination Origin of Hyperbolic Reflections Travel time (TWTT) to point source changes as antenna passes over top. Reflections plotted as if they are directly beneath antenna Reflection hyperbola from steel rebar (bar test) 14

Method of measurement continuous scanning scans (traces), samples, time, distance profiles are often best source of information for interpretation Profiles in a grid 3D cube Horizontal Slices isosurface 15

Configurations: instrument model choice of antenna survey wheel cart, harness 400 MHz 270 MHz Depth & Resolution data density Data density in x (transect spacing) -.25 to 1 m Scan rate and/or speed of walking for y I like 40 scans/m samples/scan, time window, velocity, frequency I like 512, 30-60 ns 16

Depth & Resolution - attenuation depth sensitivity directly related to conductivity (basically moisture) higher conductivity means more attenuation (energy is converted to electrical currents and dispersed) continous loss of signal with depth lossy ground need for gaining signal moisture is king, but also clay minerals and electrolytes (salts) beware of salts in dry climates clay minerals versus clay-sized particles. clay is not always a deal-breaker. Depth & Resolution antenna frequency lower frequency antenna = greater depth penetration, but loss of resolution. higher frequency antenna = less depth penetration, but better resolution rule of thumb = target must be at least 25% of the downloaded wavelength that reaches it downloading = decreased frequency when energy passes into ground. 400 MHz typically becomes about 300 MHz, wavelength changes from about.75 m in air to about 1 m in ground, so resolution is about.25 m but GPR antennas are broad-band, so you get a range of frequencies and therefore a chance for detecting smaller features. 400 MHz is often best, but 270 is very good for deeper targets. 900 MHz is sometimes useful for shallow, small targets but beware of increased noise and clutter. BUT, ultimate control is ground conditions. In some cases it is not possible to improve depth penetration with lower frequencies. 17

Depth & Resolution velocity and depth bar tests and known reflectors; hyperbola fitting Depth & Resolution RDP (K) 1. Dielectric Permittivity is the degree to which a material resists the flow of an electrical charge. 2. Relative Dielectric Permittivity: ratio of dielectric permittivity of a material to that of free space. RDP for air is 1. 3. Therefore, RDP changes as moisture, temperature, porosity, and other physical properties change. 4. Variations in RDP directly affect velocity, depth of penetration, and reflection magnitudes. Material RDP V (m/ns) Air 1 0.300 Fresh Water 80 0.033 Ice 3-4 0.160 Sea Water 81-88 0.010 Dry Sand 3-5 0.150 Saturated Sand 20-30 0.060 Dry Silt 3-30 0.070 Saturated Silt 10-40 0.500 Clay 4-40 0.050 Granite 4-6 0.130 Limestone 4-8 0.120 Shales 5-15 0.090 Where: K = RDP of the material through which the radar energy passes. C = speed of light (0.2998 meters/nanosecond). V = velocity of the radar energy as it passes through a material (meters/nanosecond). 18

Disadvantages: complexity and learning curve more time consuming to process and interpret Advantages: often works when nothing else does can be used on pavement and around metal great for urban areas often provides depth information can show discrete depth intervals can give idea of 3D shape and geometry of features 19