API COPM CPMA Chapter 20.X

Similar documents
OneSubsea Subsea Sampling System

Manual of Petroleum Measurement Standards Chapter 20.3 Measurement of Multiphase Flow

A Methodology for Efficient Verification of Subsea Multiphase Meters used in Fiscal Allocation

API COPM and Petroleum Measurement Standards Overview. Paula Watkins API Manager, Measurement Standards

Continuous On-line Measurement of Water Content in Petroleum (Crude Oil and Condensate)

The Use Of Innovative Multi-Phase Flow Meters to Achieve Superior Measurement Accuracy and Reliability, While Lowering Overall Cost of Facility

STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS SUPPLEMENT No th June, 2016 STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS SUPPLEMENT

33 rd International North Sea Flow Measurement Workshop October 2015

Overview and Update of API Standards

ISO/TR TECHNICAL REPORT

Recommended Practice for Flexible Pipe

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Petroleum and natural gas industries Offshore production installations Basic surface process safety systems

87R14 PETROLEUMEXPLORATI

SPE A Systematic Approach to Well Integrity Management Alex Annandale, Marathon Oil UK; Simon Copping, Expro

Committee on Standardization of Oilfield Equipment & Materials (CSOEM) New Member Orientation

API Standards Overview

Maasvlakte CCS Project - ROAD

Committee on Standardization of Oilfield Equipment & Materials (CSOEM) New Member Orientation

Standard for Subsea High Integrity Pressure Protection Systems (HIPPS) API STANDARD 17O SECOND EDITION, JULY 2014

INVESTIGATION OF SLUG FLOW IN DEEPWATER ARCHITECTURES. Y. OLANIYAN TOTAL S.A. France

Consideration of External Pressure in the Design and Pressure Rating of Subsea Equipment API TECHNICAL REPORT 17TR12 FIRST EDITION, MARCH 2015

Solutions for Reliable and Accurate Measurement of Water Production in Subsea Wet Gas Fields

Project Experience, April 2009

DE059: Hydrocarbon Production Operations

API RP 78 Overview RECOMMENDED PRACTICES FOR WELLBORE POSITIONING 3/4/2016 PRESENTED BY LISA GRANT AT THE ISCWSA/SPE WPTS 43RD GENERAL MEETING

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

UNECE Comments to the draft 2007 Petroleum Reserves and Resources Classification, Definitions and Guidelines.

SPE PP. Active Slug Management Olav Slupphaug/SPE,ABB, Helge Hole/ABB, and Bjørn Bjune/ABB

Petroleum Safety Levy Methodology. Decision Paper

Verification / validation of sub sea multiphase meters

SPE Copyright 1998, Society of Petroleum Engineers Inc.

Operational Experiences

Progressing Cavity Pump Systems for Artificial Lift Surface-drive Systems

Recommended Practice for Wet and Dry Thermal Insulation of Subsea Flowlines and Equipment API RECOMMENDED PRACTICE 17U FIRST EDITION, FEBRUARY 2015

Oil and Gas UK Well Integrity Guidelines

This document is a preview generated by EVS

Representative Subsea Sampling: A Key Enabler for Flow Assurance and Better Metering Uncertainty

The Draft PRMS Update Evolution, not Revolution. Geoff Salter and Adam Borushek 1 November 2017

John Bednar, Chairman

Oil&Gas Subsea Production

Multiphase Metering and Well Rate Estimation Methods for Field Allocation

Horizontal Well Artificial Lift Consortium (TUHWALP) Progress and Activity Summary

SUBSEA MULTIPHASE FLOW METER

Specification for Subsea Umbilicals

Process Operations: Oil and Gas Separation

Anadarko Basin Drilling Learning Curves Drivers. Pete Chacon

4 Briefing. Responsible investor

ADCHEM International Symposium on Advanced Control of Chemical Processes Gramado, Brazil April 2-5, 2006

Unlocking potential with Kongsberg Digital Production Performance solutions. Mike Branchflower, Global Sales Manager Flow Assurance Kongsberg Digital

Module B contains eleven modules. This is Module B8. International Standards Development

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

How it works and Stakeholder Benefits

API RP 53 Recommend Practices for Blowout Prevention Equipment Systems for Drilling Wells vs. Standard 53 4 th Edition 2011

BC-10 PARQUE DAS CONCHAS

AS/NZS 1200:2000 AS/NZS

Real-time Gas Lift Optimisation using Production Universe RTO

Subsea Boosting. November 2015 John Friedemann

Operational Intelligence to Deliver Smart Solutions. Copyright 2015 OSIsoft, LLC

Applied Technology Workshop Twin Screw Multiphase Pump. Ove Jahnsen 08 February 2005

Australian Standard. Instrument transformers. Part 1: Current transformers (IEC Ed.1.2 (2003) MOD) AS AS

Training Fees 4,250 US$ per participant for Public Training includes Materials/Handouts, tea/coffee breaks, refreshments & Buffet Lunch

In any of the 5 star hotel. The exact venue will be intimated prior to course commencement.

Risk Based Classification of Offshore Production Systems Matthew D. Tremblay, ABS; Jorge E. Ballesio, ABS; Bret C. Montaruli, ABS

VPC History and Summary of Work

Subsea Sampling on the Critical Path of Flow Assurance

GOMR OCS Subsea Pipelines Regulatory Perspectives. Pipeline Section, Regional Field Operations Gulf of Mexico Region Chief, Angie D.

Who are IPIECA and IOGP?

IWCF Well Control Level 5. Celle Drilling Conference 2017

b. A roll call was completed and confirmed that there was a quorum of 22 present for this meeting (a minimum of 15 is required).

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

AS/NZS IEC :2013

Voluntary Carbon Standard

Integrity Management of Offshore Assets

IGEM/TD/101 Edition 2 Communication 1740 Adoption of pipe systems by a GT management of UIP activities

Regulatory Reforms in Mexico Energy Production and Environmental Protection. A Technical Regulator for a New Market Frame

37 th Gas-Lift Workshop Houston, Texas, USA February 3 7, Dag Almar Hansen, CEO Gas-Lift Workshop 1. Feb. 3-7, 2014

NOIA ANNUAL MEETING CONCERNS/INITIATIVES. BSEE Update. Joe Levine BSEE Washington DC April 11, 2014

International Financial Reporting Standards. IASC Foundation

Implementing FPSO Digital Twins in the Field. David Hartell Premier Oil

ARTIFICIAL LIFTING TRAINING

PART XIII Fidelity and Security of Measurement Data

In-line Subsea Sampling: Non-disruptive Subsea Intervention Technology for Production Assurance

Draft Myanmar Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Procedures: Comments 1 on aspects relevant to Offshore Oil and Gas Exploration and Production

Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchangers API STANDARD 660 NINTH EDITION, MARCH 2015

Risk Based; Approach in UK:

EUOAG Workshop. Workshop on decommissioning of offshore installations Challenges, options and lessons learned PP&A

An innovative salinity tracking device for Multiphase and Wet Gas Meter for any GVF and WLR

Details of SPE-PRMS can be found here:

ENGINEERING SERVICES CONSULTANCY

Phase 2 Executive Summary: Pre-Project Review of AECL s Advanced CANDU Reactor ACR

7 Briefing. Responsible investor

NACE International The Worldwide Corrosion Authority by NACE International All Rights Reserved Printed in the United States of America

The use of CFD to assess valve performance and operation in extreme conditions. BVAA Conference Tuesday 12 th May Alex Roff Engineering Director

Technical Challenges in Offshore Development New Technology Required for Future Offshore Development

CRIRSCO and evolving international accounting standards: IFRSs

Applying Earned Value to Overcome Challenges. In Oil and Gas Industry Surface Projects

Integrating & Operating A New Salinity Measurement System As Part of A Wet Gas Meter. Svein Eirik Monge Product Manager, Emerson Subsea Flow Metering

RELIABILITY, OPERABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY FOR DEEPWATER SUBSEA DEVELOPMENT A PARADIGM SHIFT

Brae Area Pre Decommissioning MARATHON BRAE. Brae Area Decommissioning Programme. June Revision 1.0

Integrated Modeling of Complex Gas-Condensate Networks

Transcription:

API COPM CPMA Chapter 20.X David Courtney Pamela Chacon Matt Zimmerman Dan Cutting 24 23 February 2017 Houston, TX Copyright 2017, Letton Hall Group. This paper was developed for the UPM Forum, 22 23 February 2017, Houston, Texas, U.S.A., and is subject to correction by the author(s). The contents of the paper maynot necessarily reflect the views of the UPM Forum sponsors or administrator. Reproduction, distribution, or storage of any part of this paper for commercial purposes without the written consent of the Letton Hall Group is prohibited. Non-commercial reproduction or distribution maybe permitted, provided conspicuous acknowledgment of the UPM Forumand the author(s) is made. For more information, seewww.upmforum.com.

American Petroleum Institute (API) Committee on Petroleum Measurement (COPM) Sub-Committee on Production Measurement and Allocation (CPMA) Manual of Petroleum Measurement Standards (MPMS) Chapter 20.X The CPMA committee was organized and started up during the 2007 API COPM Spring and Fall committee meetings. The committee was created to revise the 1993 version of MPMS Chapter 20.1 Allocation Measurement into 6 separate standards to better reflect the current onshore and offshore production allocation measurement needs. It was decided by the committee during the 2012 meeting that the content of the 6 th standard (20.6) was now going to be included as part of the 1 st standard (20.1). 2

CPMA Introduction Ch. 20.1 First edition September 1993. Allocation Measurement. Ch. 20.2 First edition November 2016. Production Allocation Measurement Using Single Phase Devices Ch. 20.3 First edition January 2013. Measurement of Multiphase Flow. Draft Standard First edition August 2016. Application of Hydrocarbon Phase Behavior Modeling in Upstream Measurement and Allocation Systems. Ch. 20.5 First edition recommended practice is expected in 2017. Recommended Practice for Application of Production Well Testing in Measurement and Allocation. 3

CPMA Introduction CPMA Ad-hoc Groups started at the 2016 fall meetings are: 1. Wet gas sampling. 2. Proving and meter verification for allocation liquid meters. 3. Vented sources of gas. 4

MPMS Chapter 20.1 Allocation Measurement The responsibility of the MPMS Chapter 20.1 standard was formerly transferred from the Committee on Liquid Measurement (COLM) to the CPMA committee during the fall 2007 COPM meetings. The thought at the time was to develop the other new standards first and then revise the current 20.1 to fit in with the new standards. The first Standards Resource & Research Request (SR 3 ) for 20.1 was formerly approved during the April 2010 net meeting. Another SR 3 was approved with a scope and title change during the June 2012 net meeting. A third SR 3 is planned to be presented for vote at the spring 2017 CPMA meeting to approve another scope change and a new title. 5

MPMS Chapter 20.1 Allocation Measurement The current scope of the 1993 20.1 standard is; This document provides design and operating guidelines for liquid and gas allocation measurement systems. Included are recommendations for metering, static measurement, sampling, proving, calibrating, and calculating procedures. The scope approved in 2012 is; This document provides an overview of liquid and gas allocation including measurement system design and operating guidelines. Common production measurement configurations are described to provide a background of how production well fluids are produced, gathered and processed. The processes of reconciling or allocating the production system's outflow measurement (normally custody transfer quality measurement) to the production sources (wells) are addressed. It will not specifically address other related operations such as upstream area gathering systems, and certain pipeline operations where phase change is inherent to the operation. Guidance is provided concerning the application of the other Chapter 20 documents. Included are descriptions of metering, static measurement, sampling, proving, calibrating, and calculating procedures as they apply to allocation systems. Elements common to multiple Chapter 20 subjects are contained within this document including the definition of related terms and allocation concepts and the calculation of theoretical production quantities. Quality determination of produced fluids as it relates to the allocation process is described. The measurement of single-phase, stabilized products is covered in other API standards and is not reproduced herein. The proposed scope for the new draft will be more concise with some of the above information moving to the introduction section. 6

MPMS Chapter 20.1 Allocation Measurement The proposed new table of contents is shown below. 1. Scope 2. Normative references 3. Terms and definitions 4. Relevance and Applicability of Allocation 5. Identify Allocation System Requirements 6. Select Basis of Allocation 7. Define Allocation Methodology 8. Implement Allocation System 9. Operate and Manage Allocation System 7

MPMS Chapter 20.1 Allocation Measurement A proposed flow chart will be a part of chapter 4 to help the readers understand how all the CPMA standards fit together. 8

MPMS Chapter 20.1 Allocation Measurement Value this standard will have for the industry; To give guidance on how to design, implement, and maintain an allocation system for wellhead gas, oil, and water production. To give guidance on how to incorporate the other API Chapter 20 standards, recommended practices, and draft standards into an allocation system. 9

MPMS Chapter 20.2 Production Allocation Measurement Using Single Phase Devices Chapter 20.2 is a new standard. The first SR 3 was approved during the fall 2008 CPMA meeting. An updated SR 3 was approved during the fall 2011 meetings. The draft was balloted during the last half of 2015 and all comments were resolved during the first half of 2016. The first published edition is dated November 2016. The new MPMS 20.2 standard supersedes certain sections of the current MPMS 20.1 standard. (see 20.1 Addendum 2 issued November 2016) 10

MPMS Chapter 20.2 Production Allocation Measurement Using Single Phase Devices The scope for the Chapter 20.2 standard is; This standard is applicable to single-phase measurement techniques upstream of the custody transfer points where custody transfer conditions are not possible. The standard presents single-phase flow measurement used in the allocation process and located downstream of the first stage of separation on a production facility. This standard addresses common allocation single-phase flow measurement devices for liquid hydrocarbons, water, and gas including ancillary flow measurement systems such as fuel, flare, and recirculation. This standard discusses configuration and operation of flow measurement equipment, fluid properties, production processing, associated flow conditions, and their effects on the quality of the flow measurement results. This standard discusses the possible impacts on these devices during inefficient and/or ineffective separation. 11

MPMS Chapter 20.2 Production Allocation Measurement Using Single Phase Devices The table of contents are listed below. 1. Scope 2. Normative References 3. Terms, Definitions, Acronyms, and Abbreviations 4. Overview 5. General Metering 6. Liquid Metering 7. Gas Metering 12

MPMS Chapter 20.2 Production Allocation Measurement Using Single Phase Devices Part of the introduction to the standard is as follows This standard covers the application of production allocation (determination of flow quantities and rates of oil, gas, water, and other constituents) using single-phase measurement devices in combination with a two- or three-phase production separator. When fluid flow from different wells production streams are commingled into a single processing facility or flow line, it is preferred to measure the flow from each production stream separately, either continuously or on a specified interval, before it enters the common processing facility or flow line. Periodic measurement at a specified interval is the common practice since continuous measurement of an individual well production stream is normally not an available option. 13

MPMS Chapter 20.2 Production Allocation Measurement Using Single Phase Devices Value this standard will have for the industry; The standard provides guidance with respect to the major factors that could contribute to measurement uncertainty for single-phase devices used in production allocation. The standard discusses design considerations for production allocation measurement. 14

MPMS Chapter 20.3 Measurement of Multiphase Flow The Chapter 20.3 is a new standard. The first SR 3 was approved during the spring 2008 CPMA committee meeting. The first and current edition was published in January 2013. It supersedes certain sections of the current MPMS 20.1 standard, API Recommended Practice (RP) 86-2005 (which has been withdrawn), and certain sections of API RP 85-2003. A new SR 3 was approved during the fall 2016 committee meeting to reopen the standard for a revision to include lessons learned and additional requirements the industry has identified as gaps in the first edition. 15

MPMS Chapter 20.3 Measurement of Multiphase Flow The current scope of MPMS Chapter 20.3 is; This standard addresses multiphase flow measurement in the production environment, upstream of the custody transfer (single-phase) measurement point, where allocation measurement for onshore, offshore, or subsea is applied. For other multiphase flow measurement applications, such as reservoir management, well tests, and flow assurance, the standard can be used as a reference or guide. However, the focus of this standard is on those applications where the accuracy of multiphase flow measurement for allocation systems is required. This document refers to existing standards and recommended practices to supplement the guidance it provides in this subject area. The document addresses principles used in multiphase flow measurement, multiphase metering types and classifications, assessment of expected performance, and selecting and operating multiphase measurement systems. Operational requirements or constraints are addressed, including expectations for flow meter acceptance, calibration criteria, flow loop and in situ verifications, and other guidance specific to different multiphase flow metering applications. The document does not address specific meter configurations. 16

MPMS Chapter 20.3 Measurement of Multiphase Flow The table of contents for Chapter 20.3 is; 1. Scope 2. Terms, Definitions, Abbreviations, and Symbols 3. Multiphase and Wet Gas Flow 4. Techniques of Multiphase Flow Metering Systems 5. Multiphase Flow Metering Systems Calibration, Correction, Performance Testing, and Verification. 6. Multiphase Measurement Uncertainty 7. Operation and Application of Multiphase Flow Metering Systems 8. Selection of Multiphase Flow Metering Systems 9. Integration Testing, Installation, Commissioning, and Decommissioning 10. Multiphase Flow Metering System Calibration, Performance Testing, and Verification 11. Operation 17

MPMS Chapter 20.3 Measurement of Multiphase Flow This standard provides guidance on multiphase flow measurement taken upstream of the custody transfer point. The standard is intended for the application of production allocation measurement where required by commercial contracts. While this document is not aimed specifically for use in reservoir management or other operational needs, it can be used for this purpose. This standard addresses in depth the question of how the user measures (multiphase) flow rates of oil, gas, water, and any other fluids that are present in the production stream. In this standard, the measurement of multiphase flow addresses all possible flow conditions that can be encountered in the production of oil and gas i.e. there are no conditions specifically excluded here that are found in typical hydrocarbon production. 18

MPMS Chapter 20.3 Measurement of Multiphase Flow Value this standard will have for the industry; The value for 20.3 is that it documents, for the first time, guidance and requirements for selection and operation of multiphase meters. A work group is currently being formed to revise the current standard so it will bring even more value to the industry. 19

MPMS Chapter 20.3 Measurement of Multiphase Flow Work group directives for the 20.3 revision. Direction on device selection:- a) limitations and differences between technologies b) technical methods of measurement (discuss variables and how to determine them in more detail i.e. WLR, GVF, velocity, slip effects) Direction on verification including both Insitu/diagnostic based and External methods (test separator, production separator, virtual metering, system balance) Common every day operational considerations 20

MPMS Chapter 20.3 Measurement of Multiphase Flow Work group directives for the 20.3 revision continued. Performance expectation:- a) Pros and cons of calibration loops using live fluids and higher pressure (clearly define lab deliverables, what adjustments are made to the meter and how do the adjustments correlate to the field conditions) direction for vendors to disclose, come up with generic form with list of factors. b) revisit performance at low process pressure c) water properties impact on performance d) uncertainty of phase behavior/pvt should be considered independent of instrument uncertainty (PVT can be done internal or external to the meter flow computer. Address new technologies or alternatives to traditional multiphase meters since publication 21

MPMS Draft Standard Application of Hydrocarbon Phase Behavior Modeling in Upstream Measurement and Allocation Systems The API MPMS is a draft standard (a prospective standard for provisional application) and is why there is not a chapter (20.X) number assigned to the document. It will remain a draft standard for a 2-year review period. During that time the industry can submit comments on the standard that will be reviewed for incorporation into the standard when revised. Then the CPMA committee will vote to move it to a first edition standard and give it a chapter number. The first SR 3 was approved during the spring 2008 CPMA committee meeting. There were two more SR 3 s approved, one during the fall 2013 committee meeting and the other during the spring of 2015. Both SR 3 were for a scope changes and the second one was for a title change as well. The first edition draft standard was balloted and approved during the last half of 2015 and first half of 2016. It currently has a published date of August 2016. 22

MPMS Draft Standard Application of Hydrocarbon Phase Behavior Modeling in Upstream Measurement and Allocation Systems The current Scope is: This document provides requirements and guidelines for the application of hydrocarbon phase behavior modelling in upstream measurement and allocation systems. The requirements and guidelines apply to the development, implementation and performance management of a process simulation model (PSM) incorporating an equation of state (EOS) description of phase behavior. This includes functional specifications, validation and maintenance of the PSM, EOS specification and implementation, and fluid compositional specification and validation. 23

MPMS Draft Standard Application of Hydrocarbon Phase Behavior Modeling in Upstream Measurement and Allocation Systems The table of contents are listed below. 1. Scope 2. Normative References 3. Terms, Definitions, Abbreviations, and Symbols 4. Relevance and Applicability of Hydrocarbon Phase Behavior Modeling 5. Development of a PSM Using an EOS Description of Phase Behavior 6. Implementation of a PSM Using an EOS Description of Phase Behavior 7. Performance Management 24

MPMS Draft Standard Application of Hydrocarbon Phase Behavior Modeling in Upstream Measurement and Allocation Systems This draft standard establishes a framework to develop, implement, and manage the application of hydrocarbon phase behavior modeling in upstream measurement and allocation systems. The applied phase behavior modeling addressed in this document refers to a process simulation model (PSM) incorporating an equation of state (EOS) description of the phase behavior, or pressure, volume, temperature (PVT) properties, of the fluids within the modeled process. The intent of this document is to provide operators with a consistent and transparent approach for applying and managing an EOS-based PSM within an upstream measurement and allocation system. It is not intended to prescribe a particular mathematical phase estimation (i.e. EOS), process simulation (i.e. PSM), or allocation method. Allocation methodologies are addressed in API MPMS Chapter 20.1. 25

MPMS Draft Standard Application of Hydrocarbon Phase Behavior Modeling in Upstream Measurement and Allocation Systems Value this standard will have for the industry; Provides the industry with requirements and guidelines for an emerging technology; Provides the industry with the opportunity to use the document, and generate feedback prior to evaluating as a full standard; 26

MPMS Chapter 20.5 Application of Production Well Testing in Measurement and Allocation The first SR 3 for Ch. 20.5 was approved during the fall 2009 CPMA committee meeting. Another SR 3 was approved for added funding during the spring 2015 meeting. A third SR 3 was approved at the fall 2016 meeting to approve a title and scope change. The draft is currently being balloted within the CPMA committee with a March 2, 2017 closing date. The first published Ch. 20.5 should be during 2017. 27

MPMS Chapter 20.5 Application of Production Well Testing in Measurement and Allocation The approved new title is; Recommended Practice for Application of Production Well Testing in Measurement and Allocation. The approved new scope is; This document provides recommendations and guidelines for the application of production well testing in production measurement and allocation. The recommendations and guidelines apply to conducting a production well test, calculating production well test volumes and rates, and the application of production well test data for use in measurement and allocation. This includes production well testing preparation, initiation, measurement, validation, and volume and rate calculations for separator, multiphase flow meter, and tank production well test systems. Additionally, this document addresses the proration of production well test results for use in allocation, the application of production well tests for validation and update of well flow models and virtual flow metering, and the adjustment of gas well continuous measurement results with production well test data. This document also provides recommendations and guidelines for the application of well flow modeling and virtual flow metering in production measurement and allocation. 28

MPMS Chapter 20.5 Application of Production Well Testing in Measurement and Allocation The table of contents are listed below. 1. Scope 2. Normative References 3. Terms, Definitions, Abbreviations and Symbols 4. Production Well Testing in Upstream Measurement and Allocation 5. Conducting a Production Well Test 6. Calculating Production Well Test Volumes and Rates 7. Applying Production Well Test Data for Use in Allocation 29

MPMS Chapter 20.5 Application of Production Well Testing in Measurement and Allocation The RP establishes a framework to conduct and apply production well testing for well rate determination in measurement and allocation. Production well testing addressed in the document refers to measurement of gas, oil, and water quantities from a single well during a specified length of time under controlled operational conditions. The intent of the document is to provide operators with a consistent and transparent approach for conducting, applying, and managing production well testing within an upstream measurement and allocation system. It is not intended to prescribe a particular production well test method, or particular application of production well test data use in allocation. Allocation methodologies are addressed in API MPMS Ch. 20.1. 30

MPMS Chapter 20.5 Application of Production Well Testing in Measurement and Allocation Value this recommended practice will have for the industry; The RP establishes a framework to conduct and apply production well testing for well rate determination in measurement and allocation. The intent of the document is to provide operators with a consistent and transparent approach for conducting, applying, and managing production well testing within an upstream measurement and allocation system. 31

Summary The API CPMA committee has developed standards and is getting close to developing and revising more standards related to the production/allocation measurement areas for the oil and gas industry. This area of the industry has unique issues and problems that are being addressed with these new standards that should assist industry companies and regulatory groups to better understand how to set up systems to perform production allocation measurement. 32