SPRING FLYWAYS OF MIGRATING SOARING BIRDS IN AKKAR/NORTHERN LEBANON

Similar documents
BULGARIAN SOCIETY FOR THE PROTECTION OF BIRDS

RAPTOR MIGRATION IN THE RED SEA AREA

Environmental Issues and Wind Energy Development in Egypt

Wind energy: Possible threats to an endangered natural habitat in Izmir (Turkey)

Wind farms and birds - the SSS Specificity

WindWise Education. 2 nd. T ransforming the Energy of Wind into Powerful Minds. editi. A Curriculum for Grades 6 12

Ecological Impacts of Wind Farms: Global Studies. Are Wind Farms Hazardous to Birds and Bats? Stephen J. Ambrose

JABAL MOUSSA IMPORTANT BIRD AREA STUDIES PRELIMINARY RESULTS

Impact of wind farms on birds and bats

Subject: Comments on FWS R5 ES , Environmental Impact Statement for Beech Ridge Energy s Habitat Conservation Plan

What is a Bird of Prey?

C.4 Avian Study Summary of Results

Review of the Illegal Killing, Trapping and Trade (IKB) of Birds of Prey in the Mediterranean

Krnovo Wind Farm. Bird Survey Report (November February 2016) March Akuo Energy

Guidance on appropriate means of impact assessment of electricity power grids on migratory soaring birds in the Rift Valley / Red Sea Flyway

Research Note Effect of Pesticides Application on Migratory Soaring Birds in Four Agricultural areas in Sudan

Working with others to conserve, protect, and enhance fish, wildlife, plants, and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American people.

A large-scale, multispecies assessment of avian mortality rates at onshore wind turbines in northern Germany (PROGRESS) T.

The timing of spring passage of soaring birds at Zait bay, Egypt

Kingston Field Naturalists

Work Plan for Pre-Construction Avian and Bat Surveys

Golden Eagle (Aquila chrysaetos)

FIGURE 1 THE KINGBIRD

Rochester Birding Association, 55 Ontario St., Honeoye Falls NY 14472

Meenbog Wind Farm Development. Post-construction Bird Monitoring Programme

vultures: : AMP case study

Vultures, Bats and Wind farms

Results of Collaborative Survey of Migratory Raptors in South East Asia. Asian Research and Conservation Network (ARRCN)

Guidance note: Distribution of breeding birds in relation to upland wind farms

ESPOO hearing. Danish Energy Agency TECHNICAL NOTE 2 NEARSHORE WIND FARMS: OMOE SOUTH AND JAM- MERLAND BAY

EF Retief Presenter. Co-Authors MD Anderson; D Harebottle; A Jenkins; R Simmons; HA Smit; C Van Rooyen; J Smallie

Raptor Migration as a Conservation Opportunity: First Full-season Migration Counts in South-east Romania

The Soaring Bird Sensitivity Mapping Tool

DADIA LEFKIMI SOUFLI Forest Reserve. Status report of raptor species populations

Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus

ROMANIA REPORT REGARDING THE CONSERVATION OF THE SAKER FALCON (FALCO CHERRUG) IN ROMANIA

The soaring bird spring migration bottleneck at Ayn Sokhna, northern gulf of Suez, Egypt

Work Plan for 2015 Pre- Construction Avian and Bat Surveys Swanton Wind Project

Best Practice Avifaunal Monitoring/Impact Assessment: The way forward in South Africa. Hanneline Smit

Memorandum. Introduction

DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE OF SEA DUCKS AND DIVING DUCKS ON LAKE ST. CLAIR AND W. LAKE ERIE

Golden Eagle (Aquila chrysaetos) Management Indicator Species Assessment Ochoco National Forest

United States Air Force Europe Bird Strike Hazard Reduction

Site code: GR NATURA 2000 Data Form NATURA 2000 STANDARD DATA FORM FOR SPECIAL PROTECTION AREAS (SPA)

Eagle Observation Surveys Arkwright Summit Wind Project Chautauqua County, New York

Lecture 14 - Conservation of birds

What is Migration? CMS COP12 Regional Preparatory Workshop for Asia. [Tim Dodman] [What is migration?] August 2017 Bonn, Germany

A RESUME OF RAPTOR MIGRATION IN EUROPE AND THE MIDDLE EAST

Memorandum of Understanding on the Conservation of Migratory Birds of Prey in Africa and Eurasia

BIRD MONITORING REPORT PARAVANI TRANSMISSION LINE

Migratory Soaring Birds Project

RSPB CENTRE FOR CONSERVATION SCIENCE

Discussion of California Condors and Habitat Conservation Planning in the Tehachapi Wind Resource Area. Friday - April 7, 2017 Mojave, CA

POST-CONSTRUCTION WILDLIFE MONITORING AT THE ATLANTIC CITY UTILITIES AUTHORITY- JERSEY ATLANTIC WIND POWER FACILITY

A COMPUTER VISION AND MACHINE LEARNING SYSTEM FOR BIRD AND BAT DETECTION AND FORECASTING

Chokecherry and Sierra Madre Wind Energy Project

Anthony Gonzon DE Division of Fish & Wildlife DNREC

An Ecological Risk Assessment of Wind Energy Development in Montana

Memorandum. To: Heritage Wind, LLC. From: Justin Zoladz. Date: October 30, Re: 2017 Spring Migratory Raptor Survey Results

Short paper. Raptor migration at Antikythira, in southern Greece

Nr. LIFE13 BIO/LT/001303

Mitigating potential impacts to Brolga at proposed Victorian Wind Energy Facilities. Mark Venosta, Biosis NZWEA 2014

United States Department of the Interior

ASSESSMENT OF THE MERITS OF A CMS INSTRUMENT COVERING MIGRATORY RAPTORS AND OWLS IN THE AFRICAN EURASIAN REGION CONSULTATION DOCUMENT

Windfarm development and bird conservation

PSE Avian Protection Program -Hydro -Wind -Distribution/Transmission -Substations. Mel Walters, Program Manager Consulting Natural Resource Scientist

Greenlaw Mountain Hawk Watch Fall 2012

Uptake of BirdLife South Africa/ EWT Best Practice Guidelines for Bird and Wind Energy

Wildlife monitoring in Cyprus. Nicolaos Kassinis Game and Fauna Service (GFS)

A STUDY INTO THE IMPORTANCE OF JABAL MOUSSA FOR BIRDS IN LEBANON

BIRD MONITORING REPORT PARAVANI TRANSMISSION LINE

ADDENDUM TO BIRD IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED WAAIHOEK WIND ENERGY FACILITY NEAR UTRECHT, KWAZULU-NATAL

Night-time obstruction lighting for offshore (and onshore) wind farms and birds: demands from different interest groups

CDOW Recommended Stipulations for Oil and Gas Within the State of Colorado

EEB 4260 Ornithology. Lecture Notes: Migration

Prepared by Daniel Piec Natura International Polska

Avian Studies for the Sanilac County Michigan Wind Power Project: Summary of 2007 Field Seasons - Annual Report

March 22, Ms. Diana Heyder, NEPA Division U.S. Department of Energy Golden Field Office Denver West Parkway Golden, CO 80401

BirdLife International Marine Programme Marine Important Bird & Biodiversity Areas (Marine IBAs)

Measuring changes in a rapidly changing climate and landscape.

Influence of High-Latitude Warming. Golden Eagles (Aquila chrysaetos)

Amherst Island Biodiversity Threatened

Greenlaw Mountain Hawk Watch Fall 2014

Nr. LIFE13 BIO/LT/001303

Mixed Conifer Working Group Meeting February 17, 2011 Wildlife Habitat Management Considerations

Wintering Corn Buntings

CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACT ON MIGRATORY BIRDS IN POLAND

PART FIVE: Grassland and Field Habitat Management

THE ROLE OF ECOLOGICAL NETWORKS IN THE CONSERVATION OF MIGRATORY SPECIES

SPECIES ACTION PLAN. Rhinolophus ferrumequinum 1 INTRODUCTION 2 CURRENT STATUS 3 CURRENT FACTORS AFFECTING 4 CURRENT ACTION

Scientific Integrity and Transparency in Bird Mortality Data From Wind Energy Development

Small and Large Bird Surveys: Adam s Point Proposed Wind Energy Site Final Report

Brief report to Ramsar Convention Secretariat. Azerbaijan Republic

Introduction. Previous and Ongoing Studies on This Issue

INTEGRATIVE MIGRATORY BIRD MANAGEMENT ON MILITARY BASES: THE ROLE OF RADAR ORNITHOLOGY

CONVENTION ON MIGRATORY SPECIES

Prepared For: Marble River, LLC 4300 Wilson Boulevard Arlington, VA and Horizon Wind Energy 1001 McKinney Suite 1740 Houston, TX 77002

Natural Heritage Inventory and Evaluation for the Medway Valley Heritage Forest South ESA. Public Meeting January 27, 2014

BIRDS AND BATS: Potential Impacts and Survey Techniques

Sandhill Cranes and Waterfowl of the North Platte River Valley: Evaluation of Habitat Selection to Guide Conservation Delivery

Transcription:

Lebanese Science Journal, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2015 15 SPRING FLYWAYS OF MIGRATING SOARING BIRDS IN AKKAR/NORTHERN LEBANON Ghassan Ramadan-Jaradi and Mona Ramadan-Jaradi Faculty of Science (1), Lebanese University, P.O. Box 13-5292, Beirut, Lebanon grjaradi@hotmail.com (Received 11 September 2014 - Accepted 12 November 2014) ABSTRACT Beale and Ramadan-Jaradi initiated in 2001 the first large scale survey in Lebanon to trace the main routes of migrating raptors and other soaring birds, aiming at contributing to the conservation of flyways and stopover sites through the identification of areas where protection is most needed. Nowadays, the study of the flyways and stopover sites at micro level becomes necessary following the development of the national wind atlas map that will assist among others in locating potential wind farms which on their turn may influence the migratory birds flyways, especially that the wind farms use winds for their function and the soaring birds use wind for their transportation. The present work starts from where the work of Beale and Ramadan-Jaradi ended but in an attempt to provide policy makers, scientists and experts with a conceptual framework, as well as methodological and operational tools for dealing with wind farms impacts and to prevent collisions of birds with blades of wind turbines. The study is meant to be conducted during spring and autumn passage of birds. This paper concerns the spring migration as at the time of writing it the autumn migration didn t start yet. The present spring season study revealed among others that the migratory soaring birds that may use the wind ridge lifts for their soaring travel in windy areas are more influenced by two other main factors: 1) presence of depressions perpendicular to mountain s ridges and 2) abundance of the thermals in these depressions, a matter that naturally reduces the impact of wind turbines by attracting the birds away from their blades. Keywords: wind farms, migratory flyways, soaring birds, Lebanon INTRODUCTION As the demand for clean energy increases, wind power generating stations are being constructed across many countries, including Lebanon as their infrastructure is under installation in north Lebanon s mountain since the end of 2011. However, concerns have been raised about the possible impact of these power generating stations on birds, especially when endangered raptors were observed being injured and killed after flying into wind turbines in various wind farms where research has focused primarily on mortality caused by birds striking turbine blades and associated wires. Researchers like Airola (1987), Crockford (1992), Desholm and Kahlert (2005), McIssak (2001) and Craig et al. (2010) have focused their work on the potential impact of wind turbines on bird species. Meek et al. (1993) and Percival (1999 have attempted, among others, to bring birds and wind turbines to coexist through mitigating the wind turbines impact. Unfortunately, Lebanon s literature is lacking avian studies in relation to wind energy, whilst the disturbance to breeding, wintering or staging birds as a result of turbines functioning has not been examined in the country yet

Lebanese Science Journal, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2015 16 because these turbines, as indicated above, are still under installation. In this case, this study of the spring flyways at micro level over the windy area of Lebanon will not only complement the study of the fall flyways in Lebanon of Beale & Ramadan-Jaradi (2001) but will also assist in detecting if the windy areas and the soaring bird flyways will overlap and in predicting the specific impact of wind turbines on soaring birds in the country. With respect to avian mortality at wind power generating stations, the greatest concern has been for raptors and other soaring birds. The concern stems from the fact that many populations are small and thus even a few deaths can lead to declines (Morrison,.1998). Subsequent to this, all soaring bird species will be recorded and analyzed in attempt to avoid installing wind farms in places where threatened species are at the stake. The goal of the project behind the present study is fourfold: 1) Trace the micro-birdflyways within the windy areas (potential sites of wind farms) in Lebanon, 2) Study the effect of wind farms installation on the existing habitats, 3) Recommend ways of reducing potential impacts of turbines on birds in windy areas of North Lebanon, including preventing wind farms installation on the bird flyways, and 4) Recommend a program whereby potential effects of wind turbines on birds can be monitored at the windiest parts of Lebanon that are indicated on the Wind Atlas of the country. Most of these goals will not be fully achieved before studying the micro flyways of the fall migration. Even though, the first fold is presently fully achieved. STUDY AREA The study area lies in an elliptical shape area with a center at a longitude of 36 15'23.68"E and a latitude of 34 26'27.98"N (Fig. 1). It covers about 800 km 2 of mountain range running NNE-SSW. The ridge of these mountains varies roughly between 1000 meters a.s.l. in the north and 2840 meters in the south of the northern quart. The most important feature of the range is its western slopes of mainly NE-SW oriented hills and valleys that provide a variety of lift types to soaring birds. METHODS To chart the picture of micro migration in the northern quart of Lebanon during the spring 2014, three groups of sites were selected (Figure 1) running in a W-E direction across the mountain range. The first northern group includes three sites (Aydamoun 34 35'57.48"N & 36 16'28.94"E, Oudine Valley 34 35'33.69"N & 36 19'21.98"E and Akroum 34 35'7.69"N & 36 21'4.57"E), the second central group of the northern quart contains three sites (Akkar Attiqa 34 31'19.23"N & 36 14'32.74"E, Chambouq 34 31'10.29"N & 36 17'55.13"E and Bustane 34 30'34.88"N & 36 19'34.39"E) and the third group lies further to the south to encompass also three sites (Jroud El Dounniyeh 34 24'28.81"N & 36 8'23.96"E, Marjhine 34 24'3.00"N & 36 14'37.39"E and Jroud El Hermel 34 24'28.98"N & 36 21'7.08"E). In addition to the three groups, a study was also conducted at a tenth site in Mrebin 34 20'5.73"N & 36 9'41.89"E so that the most important windy sites are covered. From all these sites, one gathered information concerning routes, numbers, dates and species diversity. Observations took place between the last week of February and the first week of June 2014, and were made continuously between 08:30 and 18:00 on 10 days from hillsides where good vision is possible. Each group of sites was studied on a similar number of survey days (3 days). Observations made during the period of the study involved identification of all species

Lebanese Science Journal, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2015 17 of soaring and semi-soaring birds. Numbers of individuals were recorded, together with an indication of distance from the observer and approximate direction of flight. Where birds were seen at great distance or darkened under brightening sky and could not be specifically identified, they were identified to the highest taxa possible, e.g. Falco sp.). Figure 1. Wind map of Lebanon with circled study area and numbered study stations. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION During 10 days in the study period, 12397 individuals of soaring birds were counted in 10 different sites. They belong to 17 soaring raptor species and 4 non-raptor soaring bird species (Ramadan-Jaradi et al., 2008). Of these 21 species, the most abundant and significant nine were totalling 10854 individuals, to which were added 10 individuals belonging to four globally threatened species (the last 4 species in Table 1) as they are of high significance (Birdlife International, 2010) even if they are represented by one individual each (Table 1).

Lebanese Science Journal, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2015 18 TABLE 1 Number of Birds Individuals per Species and Sites Species Total Site 1 Site 2 Site 3 Site 4 Site 5 Site 6 Site 7 Site 8 Site 9 Site 10 Lesser Spotted Eagle 3128 113 518 38 55 680 213 355 627 239 290 Honey Buzzard 3034 107 558 89 30 543 180 213 676 254 384 Levant Sparrowhawk 1695 16 450 235 75 254 118 42 116 124 265 Steppe Buzzard 968 48 195 56 67 175 61 134 161 48 23 Red-footed Falcon 549 30 93 22 25 106 15 0 200 41 17 White Pelican 465 14 88 60 33 76 42 16 45 37 54 White Stork 411 45 150 11 2 64 0 35 31 12 61 Short-toed Eagle 376 4 18 26 32 59 27 55 81 0 74 Common Crane 228 12 27 14 0 35 8 7 66 0 59 Greater Spotted Eagle 4 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 Imperial Eagle 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 Egyptian Vulture 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Cinereous Vulture 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Total 10864 390 2099 551 320 1995 664 858 2005 755 1227 Of the raptors, the most abundant are the Lesser Spotted Eagle Aquila pomarina (3128 individuals) and the Honey Buzzard Pernis apivorus (3034) followed by the Levant Sparrowhawk Accipiter brevipes (1695), Steppe Buzzard Buteo buteo vulpinus (968), Redfooted Falcon Falco vespertinus (549) and the Short-toed Eagle Circaetus gallicus (376). Of the non-raptor soaring birds, the most abundant is the White Pelican Pelecanus onocrotalus with 465 individuals followed by the White Stork Ciconia ciconia with 411 individuals and the Common Crane Grus grus with 228 individuals. The abundance of these 9 species is visualized in Figure 2; whereas the peaks for the most abundant species are given in Table 2. 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 Number of the most abundant spring soaring birds in the windy area of north Lebanon Figure 2. Total recorded numbers of the most abundant soaring bird species in the study area of the north Lebanon.

Lebanese Science Journal, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2015 19 TABLE 2 Peaks Periods for Each of the Most Abundant Soaring Migratory Species in North Lebanon Lesser Spotted Eagle 3128 Honey Buzzard 3034 Levant Sparrowhawk 1695 Steppe Buzzard 968 Red-footed Falcon 549 White Pelican 465 White Stork 411 Short-toed Eagle 376 Common Crane 228 March April May June Generally, Table 2 records show that the most abundant nine species peaked from end of March till end of April. This is the case of Lesser Spotted Eagle, Steppe Buzzard, White Pelican, White Stork and Short-toed Eagle. The Honey Buzzard, Levant Sparrowhawk and Red-footed Falcon peak in late April early May. Only the Common Crane peaks in early March. The number of migrants in each of the different inspected sites (Figure 2) suggests the migratory front in northern Lebanon is wide. Moreover, there were migrants passing between the sites of each group (pers. obs.) indicating clearly that our total will be lower than the true figure for the entire spring migration in the observed area. Nevertheless, the survey allows a clear idea of the pattern of migration. The results in Plate 2 indicate that Oudine Valley, Chambouq, Marjhine and to a lesser extent Mrebine which are longitudinally aligned, account for 67 % of the total recorded. With the volume of concentration they have between Oudine Valley and Mrebine, the birds trace the main route of spring migration in the northern quart of Lebanon. This route differs slightly from the fall route in the same quart that was traced by Beale and Ramadan-Jaradi in 2001 (Figure 3). Jabal Akroum is a mountain (Jabal) with many villages on its slopes, one of which is also called Akroum (Site 3). The latter represents 5% of the individuals of the most 9 abundant species, whereas in the south of Jabal Akroum, more precisely at Bustane area (site 9), the total recorded is insignificantly higher (7%). Compared to the 67% at the main spring flyway, the sites 3 and 9 of Jabal Akroum hold about 10% of those birds passing in the main flyway. In addition, our own observation showed that the migratory soaring birds fly under the effect of ridge lift at a relatively high altitude above the recently installed few wind turbines that are under testing and waiting for Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) before they are increased to establish wind farms. As for the Oudine Valley that extends along c.14 km in N-S direction, it forms an ideal rich in thermals passage that is a depression

Lebanese Science Journal, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2015 20 perpendicular to the mountain ridge, where birds prefer to soar either in thermals rising from the floor of the valley or in lifts. Such depression may create a bottleneck for the soaring birds (Ramadan-Jaradi, in prep.). The lifts are created by updrafts that are generated when a steady wind strikes a hill, cliff, and this is referred to as obstruction lift. The latter is formed on the eastern facing west slopes of the valley. Figure 3. Fall migration routes traced by Beale and Ramadan-Jaradi (2001) and spring migration route determined by the present study. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS These surveys confirmed that the main spring flyway of the soaring bird species is not traversing the potential wind farms area in Jabal Akroum. But this finding doesn t mean that an EIA is not a must everywhere there is a plan to erect wind turbines and their accessories. Recognizing that the migration of soaring birds differs in numbers and pattern between autumn and spring, the fall migration needs to be explored during the second phase of our project in the study area in order to trace the true flyways within or adjacent to the potential wind farms. Key species found during this study (example: globally threatened species) should be covered by conservation activities and their frequented sensitive sites should be determined with the hope to incorporate them in a network of sites that are termed important for transiting or over flying soaring birds and worthy of management and protection. Further studies in the Anti-Lebanon Range would assist in the estimation of the overall size of migrants in Lebanon and may identify new hotspots or significant stopover sites for inclusion in the network of important bird areas (Evans, 1994) as well as for promoting bird watching as a tool of awareness and eco-tourism in the country. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Our thanks to the National Council for Scientific Research (CNRS) - Lebanon for providing facilities and financial support to this study.

Lebanese Science Journal, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2015 21 REFERENCES Airola, D. 1987. Bird abundance and movements at the Potrero Hills wind turbine site, Solano County, California. Prepared for the Solano County Department of Environmental Management, Fairfield, California. Beale, C.M. and Ramadan-Jaradi, G. 2001. Autumn routes of migrating raptors and other soaring birds in Lebanon. Sandgrouse, 23(2): 124-129. BirdLife International 2010. The BirdLife checklist of the birds of the world, with conservation status and taxonomic sources. Version 3. Available from http://www.birdlife.info/docs/spcchecklist/checklist_v3_june10.zip [.xls zipped 1.6 MB]. Craig, K.R., Willis, R., Barclay, M.R., Boyles, J.G., Brigham, M.R., Brack, V.Jr., Waldien, D.L., Reichard, J. 2010. Bats are not birds and other problems with Sovacool's (2009) analysis of animal fatalities due to electricity generation. Energy Policy, 38(4): 2067. Crockford, N.J. 1992. A review of the possible impacts of wind farms on birds and other wildlife. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, JNCC report no. 27, Peterborough, United Kingdom. Desholm, M., Kahlert, J. 2005. Avian collision risk at an offshore wind farm. Biology Letters, 1(3): 296 298. Evans, M.I. 1994. Important bird areas in the Middle East. BirdLife International (BirdLife Conservation series No. 2), Cambridge. McIsaac, H.P. 2001. Raptor acuity and wind turbine blade conspicuity. Pp. 59-87. National Avian-Wind Power Planning Meeting IV, Proceedings. Prepared by Resolve, Inc., Washington DC. Meek, E.R., Ribbands, J.B., Christer, W.G., Davy, P.R. and Higginson, I. 1993. The effects of aerogenerators on moorland bird populations in the Orkney Islands, Scotland. Bird Study, 40: 140-143. Morrison, M.L.1998. Avian risk and fatality protocol. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado. Percival, S.M. 1999. Birds and wind turbines: can they live together? Wind Directions, Apr. 1999, pp. 345-350. Ramadan-Jaradi, G., Bara, T. and Ramadan-Jaradi, M. 2008. Revised checklist of the birds of Lebanon 1999-2007. Sandgrouse, 30(1): 22-69.