Life of a Stanford Invention

Similar documents
Life of a Stanford Invention

Life of a Stanford Invention

2014 Healthcare Congress June 2014 Sara Nakashima Stanford University Office of Technology Licensing

Discovery: From Concept to the Patient - The Business of Medical Discovery. Todd Sherer, Ph.D.

Technology Transfer: Working with Industry at MIT. 10 February 2009 Kenneth A. Goldman Manager, Corporate Relations MIT Industrial Liaison Program

Transferring UCLA discoveries to the public. Kathryn Atchison, DDS, MPH Vice Provost, Associate Vice Chancellor for Research

UW REGULATION Patents and Copyrights

Chapter 7 Fostering Innovation for the Bene fi t of Society: Technology Licensing s Role at Stanford

TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION LEGISLATION HIGHLIGHTS

Technology Transfer. Research Universities as Engines for Economic Development

University Tech Transfer

Collaborating with the Office of Technology Transfer

Technology Transfer and the University: an orientation for new faculty at Johns Hopkins University

Academic Technology Licensing & the America Invents Act

Policy on Patents (CA)

Overview. How is technology transferred? What is technology transfer? What is Missouri S&T technology transfer?

Lewis-Clark State College No Date 2/87 Rev. Policy and Procedures Manual Page 1 of 7

IP and Technology Management for Universities

California State University, Northridge Policy Statement on Inventions and Patents

Intellectual Property Ownership and Disposition Policy

Stanford s licensing and equity practices with biotechnology companies

TECHNOLOGY COMMERCIALIZATION AND INNOVATION STRATEGY

MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY PROCEDURES ON PATENTS AND TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER APPROVED BY THE PRESIDENT NOVEMBER 2, 2015

WPI Intellectual Property A day in the life of the tech transfer office. Todd Keiller Director, Intellectual Property and Innovation

Intellectual Property. Rajkumar Lakshmanaswamy, PhD

Identifying and Managing Joint Inventions

Governing Council. Inventions Policy. October 30, 2013

University IP and Technology Management. University IP and Technology Management

Palfrey, John. Published by The MIT Press. For additional information about this book. No institutional affiliation (21 Jan :39 GMT)

Policy 7.6 Intellectual Property Policy

(1) Patents/Patentable means:

International Intellectual Property Practices

EL PASO COMMUNITY COLLEGE PROCEDURE

Northwestern Intellectual Property Policies. OSR-Evanston Quarterly Network Monday, April 13 th Ben Frey, J.D., Senior Contracts Manager

Evaluating a Report of Invention & Licensing. Technology Development Boot Camp Peter Liao March 25, 2013

TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER AT THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE: INVENTIONS AND COMMERCIALIZATION

Loyola University Maryland Provisional Policies and Procedures for Intellectual Property, Copyrights, and Patents

University of Connecticut

Managing Intellectual Property: from invention disclosure to commercialisation

Richard Kordal, PhD Director, OIPC Louisiana Technical University Feb 17, 2009 NAS Conference

PATENT AND LICENSING POLICY SUMMARY

Facilitating Technology Transfer and Management of IP Assets:

Intellectual Property and UW Technology Transfer. Patrick Shelby, PhD Technology Manager October 26, 2010

Data Sciences Entrepreneurship class

INNOVATIONS & PARTNERSHIPS OFFICE VOL Inventor s Guide to Technology Transfer

Technology Commercialization Primer: Understanding the Basics. Leza Besemann

Intellectual Property

Co-Evolution of Stanford University & the Silicon Valley: 1950 to Today

F98-3 Intellectual/Creative Property

UCF Patents, Trademarks and Trade Secrets. (1) General. (a) This regulation is applicable to all University Personnel (as defined in section

University-industry collaborations in Japan. TODAI TLO, Ltd.

Osher Lifelong Learning Institute. Innovation and Societal Impact

An Inventor s Guide to Technology Transfer

New York University University Policies

A Career in Technology Transfer: Commercializing Research in Academia. Christopher Barton, J.D. Ph.D. September 13, 2016

Document Downloaded: Tuesday July 28, A Tutorial on Technology Transfer in U.S. Colleges and Universities. Author: COGR

Alfred University Intellectual Property Policy May 2008

COMMERCIALIZING AND INVESTING IN TECHNOLOGY:

New Faculty Orientation February 9, 2011

Intellectual Property

Pharma - Biotech Collaborations: Optimizing Success, Minimizing Risk and Maintaining Alignment

Berkeley Postdoc Entrepreneur Program (BPEP)

Policy No: TITLE: EFFECTIVE DATE: CANCELLATION: REVIEW DATE:

Commercialization of Intellectual Property by Universities and Academic Institutions in the United States: Sample Agreements and Secondary Sources

UTSA Guide to Invention, Innovation, and Commercialization

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY POLICY

Why patents DO matter to YOUR business

Technology UC San Diego

WHO'S MINDING THE STORE: STOPPING YOUR IP FROM GOING OUT THE FRONT (& BACK) DOOR

UNIVERSITY LICENSING GUIDELINES (revised 2/1/12)

Why patents DO matter to YOUR business

Meet the Staff. Fairbanks, AK Tel: Fax:

A. Notice to Inventors

Engaging Industry Partners

Innovation Office. Intellectual Property at the Nelson Mandela University: A Brief Introduction. Creating value for tomorrow

VTIP in 20 Minutes What You Need to Know

Technology Transfer & Inventing in Academia

Facilitating Technology Transfer and Management of IP Assets: Country Experience

Patent Purchase Information of Seller

Dealing with Spinout Companies

Program Agenda. Opening - Why are we covering IP?

Delaware State University

The Inventor s Role: Understanding the Technology Transfer Process

Coopera've Research, Intellectual Property & Technology Transfer

Inventions, Patents, and Working with Companies. March 3, 2011 Presented by Ken Holroyd

Prof. Steven S. Saliterman. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota

Managing Innovation and Entrepreneurship Spring 2008

Policy Contents. Policy Information. Purpose and Summary. Scope. Published on Policies and Procedures (

Licensing. Guidance Creation Copyright. Licensing PROPERTY. Novelty. FAQs AND TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER DIRECTORATE OF RESEARCH AND GRADUATE TRAINING

Topic 2: The Critical Role of IP Policies in Modern Economies

CRS Report for Congress

executives are often viewed to better understand the merits of scientific over commercial solutions.

Technology Transfer Program

This Webcast Will Begin Shortly

PATENTS FOR CHEMICALS, PHARMACEUTICALS AND BIOTECHNOLOGY

University Senate agenda, June 5, 1986: PATENT AND TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER POLICY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

eskbook Emerging Life Sciences Companies second edition Chapter 8 Checklist for Planning and Conducting an Effective FTO Search

Accepting Equity When Licensing University Technology

_prop_lab_partner.htm

PROTECTION AND COMMERCIALIZATION OF RESEARCH RESULTS IN CSIC

Transcription:

Life of a Stanford Invention

Notable Stanford Inventions Functional Antibodies FM Sound Synthesis Recombinant DNA Google

Timeline of Stanford Inventions 1970 OTL Established 1971 FM Sound Synthesis ($22.9M) 1974 Recombinant DNA ($255M) 1981 Fiber Optic Amplifier ($48.4M), MINOS ($4.3M) 1984 Functional Antibodies ($551M) 1990-1992 Discrete Multi-tone Technologies for DSL ($29.6M) 1993 MIMO for Wireless Broadcast ($1.6M) 1996 Improved Hypertext Searching - Google TM ($341M) 2001-2003 Data Visualization Software ($14.8M) 2001-2007 Treatment for Celiac Disease ($0.7M) 2002 Code Error Detection Software ($10.8M) 2010-2012 Education Program for Gifted Youth ($2M) 2017 the next big thing???

Stanford inventions begin as nascent ideas supported by over $1 billion per year of funding for research across 7 schools and SLAC.

Big Picture Stanford Budget FY15-16: $5.5B Total $1.22B for research $1.63B of gifts (FY15) $22.2B Endowment OTL $95.1M income in FY15

Stanford has over 16,000 students and over 2,100 faculty members that teach and conduct research.

How are Stanford innovations transferred to others to develop into new products and companies?

Background: Stanford Intellectual Property Policies SU18 Stanford University Patent and Copyright Agreement Patent policy- University takes title to all inventions created with more than incidental use of university resources Copyright policy - University takes title to copyrightable works created with significant university resources

The Office of Technology Licensing (OTL) is responsible for the formal transfer of patents, copyrights and other technology through license agreements.

OTL s Mission: To promote the transfer of Stanford technology for society s use and benefit while generating unrestricted income to support research and education.

Most Inventions are Never Licensed 9-10 invention disclosures/week 50% have patent applications filed 20-25% are licensed* *some inventions such as software and biological materials are licensed without patent protection

Disclosures Then... 28 in 1970 Now... 484 in 2015 10,862 cumulative

How Does OTL Decide? Licensing teams try to decide which inventions can make an impact.

Questions Is the invention evolutionary or revolutionary? What is the stage of development? Is it patentable and could a patent be enforced? What is the potential market size? What is the inventor s track record?

Licensing Teams* Decide Patent and Licensing Strategy *Licensing Associate and Liaison teams have technical degrees and are market focused.

Cradle to Grave Evaluate overall potential Develop intellectual property strategy and manage patent prosecution Determine when and how to market and license the invention Negotiate contracts Maintain and amend agreements Monitor development and commercialization and track royalty payments

OTL Markets Broadly to Find the Best Fit for the Technology

Recombinant DNA: Many Companies of All Sizes

FM Sound: One Big Company

Functional Antibodies: One Mid-Sized Company

Google: One Start-Up Company

112 New License Agreements in FY15 38 non-exclusive 43 exclusive 31 option agreements

Licenses Then... Now... 3 in 1970 112 in FY15 over 2200 active licenses from ~3500 active inventions ~3500 cumulative licenses some inventions have many licensees

What is in a License?* Financial terms can include: License issue fee Annual minimum payments Earned royalties Equity (if appropriate) Non-financial terms can include: Field of Use Non-exclusive or exclusive rights Development milestones and diligence provisions Reimbursement of patent costs *Sample Agreement: http://otl.stanford.edu/industry/resources/industry_res.html?headerbar=2

Equity Can be One Component of the Financial Package Historically, about 10-15% of OTL s licenses include equity. In recent years, this has climbed to 20-25%.

License Agreements with Equity 28 licenses with equity in FY15 Stanford holds equity in 121 companies as a result of license agreements (as of Aug. 31, 2015) Managed by Stanford Management Company Liquidated soon after IPO or at merger/acquisition

Equity Cash-Out at Stanford $3.2M in FY15 $396M cumulative from equity vs. $1.77B in total income $60M cumulative from non-google equity vs. $1.37B in cumulative cash royalties

Licensed Inventions Can Develop into Products that generate income for the company and royalty returns to Stanford.

Income Then $50K in 1970 Now $95.1M in FY15 $1.77B cumulative Big Winners Cohen-Boyer Recombinant DNA ($255M) Google ($341M) Functional Antibodies ($551M)

Since 1970, Stanford inventions have generated ~$1.8 Billion in licensing income, BUT only 3 out of 11,000 inventions was a big winner and only 88 have generated over $1 million.

Most Income Comes from a Few Dockets 695 inventions generated income in FY15 42 of those generated over $100K 8 of those generated over $1M 1 invention generated over $10M

Licensing Takes Time

OTL Shares the Royalties After deductions for overhead (15%) and expenses, the net cash royalties are divided: 1/3 to inventors 1/3 to inventors departments 1/3 to inventors school

Royalty Sharing for Equity* In license agreements with equity, OTL typically negotiates 5% or less of the company, depending on the other financial terms. That equity is then distributed: 15% earmarked for OTL, with the rest divided 1/3 to the inventors (issued directly to them) 2/3 to Stanford (designated for the OTL Research Fund and the VPGE/OTL Graduate Education Fund) *In order to mitigate potential institutional conflicts of interest, equity is distributed differently than cash and Stanford Management Company handles equity designated for the university (including OTL s share).

OTL Supports Operations, Patent Costs and Research OTL s $7.9 million/year operating budget is self-funded through the 15% overhead deduction from royalties. In FY15 patent expenses were $9.6 million, this was partly offset by licensing income. OTL has contributed $88.9 million collectively to the OTL Research Incentive Fund, the OTL Research Fund, and the Vice Provost of Graduate Education/OTL Graduate Fellowship Fund.

Shared Royalties Support the Next Generation of Innovation

OTL Helps Find a Home for Stanford Inventions to grow, develop and provide opportunities for the future.

Background: OTL and the Bayh-Dole Act ~81% of research at Stanford is funded by the U.S. government Bayh-Dole Act: Federal law that created uniform patent policy regarding inventions made under federally-funded research program. (Council on Governmental Relations publications on intellectual property)

More Information on OTL Website http://otl.stanford.edu/ Search for new technologies on Techfinder The inventions that we are seeing today could change the future OTL Annual Report 2015.