Pace University Research Center. National Opinion Poll

Similar documents
Q.3 Thinking about the current path that our nation is taking, do you think our country is on the right track or headed in the wrong direction?

Methodology Marquette Law School Poll August 13-16, 2015

FOX News/Opinion Dynamics Poll

Methodology Marquette Law School Poll April 3-7, 2018

Q.3 Thinking about the current path that our nation is taking, do you think our country is on the right track or headed in the wrong direction?

Methodology Marquette Law School Poll February 25-March 1, 2018

Testing A New Methodology For Exit Polling: A National, Panel-Based Experiment

FOX News/Mason-Dixon New York State Poll

a) Getting 10 +/- 2 head in 20 tosses is the same probability as getting +/- heads in 320 tosses

FINANCIAL PROTECTION Not-for-Profit and For-Profit Cemeteries Survey 2000

THE AP-GfK POLL August, 2012

ARIZONA: CLINTON, TRUMP NECK AND NECK; McCAIN ON TRACK FOR REELECTION

CUOMO TOPS de BLASIO 4-1 AS TOP DEM IN NEW YORK, QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY POLL FINDS; CLINTON OR CUOMO STOMP GOP IN STATE IN 2016 RACE

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, March 2014, Hillary Clinton s Strengths: Record at State, Toughness, Honesty

Methodology Marquette Law School Poll June 22-25, 2017

MAT 1272 STATISTICS LESSON STATISTICS AND TYPES OF STATISTICS

1. Time, Money, and Integration - Then and Now

RUTGERS CONTACT: CLIFF

Toward A Stronger and More Resilient

WNBC/Marist Poll Poughkeepsie, NY Phone Fax

THE ASSOCIATED PRESS/AMERICA ONLINE POLL GAMING STUDY CONDUCTED BY IPSOS PUBLIC AFFAIRS PROJECT # GAMING STUDY

Methodology Marquette Law School Poll October 26-31, 2016

Birding in the United States: A Demographic and Economic Analysis

These days, surveys are used everywhere and for many reasons. For example, surveys are commonly used to track the following:

Sampling. I Oct 2008

A View from Corporate America: WINNING STRATEGIES IN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MARKETING

Objectives. Module 6: Sampling

Birding in the United States: A Demographic and Economic Analysis

A Gift of Fire: Social, Legal, and Ethical Issues for Computing Technology (Fourth edition) by Sara Baase. Term Paper Sample Topics

Karen Mossberger, Caroline Tolbert and Christopher Anderson October 27, :30am

Testimony of Professor Lance J. Hoffman Computer Science Department The George Washington University Washington, D.C. Before the

Survey of Massachusetts Congressional District #4 Methodology Report

Marist College Institute for Public Opinion Poughkeepsie, NY Phone Fax

Click here for PIF Contacts (national, regional, and state level) The Partners in Flight mission is expressed in three related concepts:

2016 Election Impact on Cherokee County Voter Registration

POLL July 14-19, 2015 Total N= 1,205 Total White N= 751 Total Black N= 312

Census Response Rate, 1970 to 1990, and Projected Response Rate in 2000

CS 4001 Possible Term Paper Topics

Sample Surveys. Chapter 11

UNCC Department of Counseling Student Job Placement Survey Results ( )

Infographics at CDC for a nonscientific audience

Nicole Austin-Hillery is the first Director and Counsel of the Brennan Center s Washington, D.C. office, which she opened in March 2008.

Unit 8: Sample Surveys

Massachusetts Renewables/ Cape Wind Survey

POLI 300 PROBLEM SET #2 10/04/10 SURVEY SAMPLING: ANSWERS & DISCUSSION

National Prog ogramming Su Survey Summer 2011

MOTIVATING BLACK COMMUNITIES TO PARTICIPATE IN THE 2020 CENSUS

1. Do you live in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania? 2. Is your annual household income more than $50,000? 3. Do you have a paying job?

WNBC/Marist Poll Poughkeepsie, NY Phone Fax

A Compendium of National Statistics on Women-Owned Businesses in the U.S. Executive Summary and Data Report

Marist College Institute for Public Opinion Poughkeepsie, NY Phone Fax

PROBABILITY-BASED SAMPLING USING Split-Frames with Listed Households

Stat Sampling. Section 1.2: Sampling. What about a census? Idea 1: Examine a part of the whole.

NATIONAL: MOST AMERICANS SAY MERRY CHRISTMAS

POSSIBLE CONTENDERS FOR PRESIDENT IN 2008 January 1-3, 2007

The Innovation Divide:

Copyright 2018 November 7-11, Interviews LCV CA-48 Post-Election Survey Margin of Error: +/- 4.0%

Glossary of Terms Black Sky Event: Blue Sky Operations: Federal Communications Commission (FCC): Grey Sky Operations:

Italian Americans by the Numbers: Definitions, Methods & Raw Data

Stat472/572 Sampling: Theory and Practice Instructor: Yan Lu Albuquerque, UNM

Strategic Foresight Initiative 2011 Summary Briefing

ROSE GARDEN MEDICAL PLAZA University Blvd., Jacksonville, FL 32216

Chapter 1 Introduction

GE 2017 Telephone Voting Intention Final Poll

1 NOTE: This paper reports the results of research and analysis

1999 AARP Funeral and Burial Planners Survey. Summary Report

Kyle W. Ferrell, Marcy M. Beverly, Ph.D., Stanley F. Kelley, Ph.D., and Cody Wellmann Sam Houston State University ~ Huntsville, Texas

WNBC/Marist Poll Poughkeepsie, NY Phone Fax

Dowel Bar Standardization. NC^2 Spring Meeting Savannah, GA

Comprehensive Research Services

Ensuring an Accurate Count of the Nation s Latinos in Census 2020

2012 ACCE Industry Advisory Board Best Practices Positioning Your Firm After the Great Recession

Public Attitudes to Nuclear Power in Britain. ESRC Climate Change Fellow and Director of the Understanding Risk Research Group, Cardiff University

Intel Research: Global Innovation Barometer

American Community Survey: Sample Design Issues and Challenges Steven P. Hefter, Andre L. Williams U.S. Census Bureau Washington, D.C.

U.S. Public Opinion & Interest on Human Enhancements Technology JANUARY 2018

Small Business Landscape 2016: Cause for Cautious Optimism

HOMELAND SECURITY & EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT (HSEM)

Introduction to SECURE Program

Understanding the Census A Hands-On Training Workshop

Reversal of Fortune: The Edge to Al Gore

The Tri-State Transit Authority

RAHS: A Systematic Process of Foresight

REACHING OUR NEXT GENERATION OF STE M PROFESSIONALS A

Student Assent Form for Survey

humanitarian impact & risks

EVERGREEN IV: YEAR 2 SUMMARY

Leading the way through. Innovation. Dr. G. Wayne Clough President, Georgia Institute of Technology. GE Energy Sales Executives January 28, 2005

1. REU Pre-survey. PRE REU Site Survey Please enter your address.

CRISIS MANAGEMENT: GUIDING YOUR ORGANIZATION THROUGH DISRUPTIVE EVENTS

The Unexpectedly Large Census Count in 2000 and Its Implications

Key Census Bureau Economic Programs and Tools

The Management of Technical Data, Software and Deemed Export Controls

Just a game? Understanding the existing and future esports market in the UK. August/September 2017 Report

Visit AGFS Website at http//:

Chapter 3 Monday, May 17th

The Effect of Natural Disasters on Climate Change and Sea Level Rise

2045 FAMPO Constrained Long Range Transportation Equity Analysis

Cabinetmaking and Fine Woodworking Apprenticeship Application

The Nature of Science

Transcription:

Pace University Research Center National Opinion Poll Pace University Poll on Technology-Based Terrorism: 69% of Americans Think Technology-Based Terrorist Threat Likely Within 3-5 Years; Concern About Cyber-Attacks Increases With Age, Reflecting A Potential Generational Divide In How Technology Is Understood And Experienced. Published: October 28, 2016

Technology-Based Terrorism: A Nation at Risk Last week, a cyberattack cut millions of Americans off from the internet, and throughout the 2016 presidential election cycle hacked emails have been released in an attempt to influence the nation s most fundamental and democratic process. Today, we are more reliant on technology than at any time in our nation s history and our vulnerability to cybercriminals and cyberattacks increases in tandem. When Americans hear the word terrorism, they instantly think of violent, unfeeling people carrying out direct, in-person attacks using guns, bombs, trucks, and planes. Technology-based terrorism can be just as deadly and destructive as conventional acts of terror, and it can be executed remotely from another location and even from the other side of the globe. Our critical infrastructure is fraught with extraordinary vulnerabilities that many may not have considered or even know exist. Our federal and state governments can and must do more to promote awareness about this everpresent risk, while simultaneously acting swiftly and effectively to eliminate our exposure to technology-based security threats. Consider some of the most basic components of our nation s critical infrastructure that are most vulnerable to technology-based terrorism: Internet and telephone systems Power grids and electrical systems Plane and train travel, as well as automobiles filled with computer chips Red light systems in every mid-sized and major city in the nation The US banking system The risk to our nation s critical infrastructure doesn t adhere to business hours. The threat exists 24 hours a day. This ever-present vulnerability sparks important questions that demand answers: If these systems are attacked, how long is the recovery period? What is the role of the federal government in coordinating measures to protect critical infrastructure operated by private companies? Is it practical to think that another country wouldn t launch an attack on a major portion of the critical infrastructure except as part of a major war? While most public attention has focused on China and Russia in this area, are other countries developing a similar capacity to attack our critical infrastructure? Is there any evidence that non-state hostile groups like ISIS and Al-Qaeda are developing similar capacities? At a time when candidates for elective office are discussing important issues as they vie for influence and votes, technology-based security has been largely absent from the public discussion. That doesn t mean, however, that Americans aren t thinking about it or that they re blind to the possibility of it. This Pace University Research Center nationwide opinion poll of adults living in the US was launched to measure that concern.

Overview This Pace University Research Center nationwide opinion poll was conducted as part of an InsideTrack interview with Joel F. Brenner, former Inspector General and Senior Counsel for the National Security Agency (NSA) and bestselling author of Glass Houses and America the Vulnerable. Titled Invisible Enemies, the interview of former Inspector General Brenner focused on emerging issues that threaten to undermine US financial markets, impact the 2016 presidential election and other high-profile national races, and disrupt essential infrastructure. Results of the poll are based on 850 responses from adults living in the US who were contacted by telephone. Respondents from all 50 states participated in the survey, which was completed on October 19, 2016. The poll has a margin of error of +/- 3.21%. All telephone calls were made from Pace University s Westchester Campus in Pleasantville, New York. Respondents were asked: "Do you believe technology-based terrorist threats are likely to occur in the next three to five years? An example would be hacking to disrupt our power grid or mass transit systems. Do you think this is likely? Findings A Pace University Research Center national poll shows that the American people believe a technology-based terrorist threat is likely to occur in the next three to five years. Overall Result 69% of Americans feel that a technology-based threat is likely to occur in the next three to five years. Gender Results show that a greater percentage of males (76%) believe a threat is likely than do females (61%). Age The older portion of those polled think a threat is more likely, reflecting a potential generational divide in how technology is understood and experienced. Millennials think a technology-based threat is less likely than any other generation. Of those who identified their age as 18 30, only 58% think technology-based terrorism is likely to occur, while 85% of people over age 60 think that it is likely. Of respondents 31 40 years old, 72% believe a technology-based threat is likely, as do respondents between the ages of 41 50 (72%). The percentage who think a technology-based security threat is likely increased to 79% for respondents aged 51 60. Race There are sizable differences among respondents who identified their ethnicity. While all groups polled above 50%, respondents identifying themselves as Caucasian polled the highest, with 78% expressing a

belief that a technology-based threat is likely to occur in the next three to five years. More than twothirds (68%) of those identifying themselves as Asian think a technology-based threat is likely. Respondents identifying themselves as African American polled at the same percentage (58%) as respondents who identified themselves as Hispanic (58%). Geographic New York State, at 68% saying yes, tracks closely with the national results. The poll also looked at states considered swing states in the 2016 presidential election: Only 43% of respondents in Colorado and 53% of those in Virginia think a technology-based threat is likely to occur. 100% of those polled in Nevada and New Hampshire think it is likely. The sentiment among respondents in the remaining swing states ranges from a solid majority to a strong majority: North Carolina (61%), Iowa (67%), Florida (68%), Ohio (68%), Pennsylvania (76%), and Michigan (77%).

Pace University Poll on Technology-Based Terrorist Threats: Comprehensive Results Results of Pace University Poll on Technology-Based Terrorism Do you believe technology-based terrorist threats are likely to occur in the next three to five years? Yes No All Americans 69% 19% Gender Males 76% 16% Females 61% 20% Age 18 30 58% 28% 31 40 72% 16% 41 50 72% 17% 51 60 79% 11% 61+ 85% 10% Race African Americans 58% 31% Asians 67% 24% Caucasians 78% 11% Hispanics 58% 31% Geographic New York 68% 16% Swing States Colorado 45% 45% Florida 68% 13% Iowa 67% 33% Michigan 77% 14% Nevada 100% 0% New Hampshire 100% 0% North Carolina 61% 18% Ohio 68% 23% Pennsylvania 76% 12% Virginia 53% 29% Wisconsin 72% 28%

Values do not always total 100%, as some respondents did not specify gender, age, or race, or indicated that they were not sure. About the Pace University Research Center The Pace University Research Center is a joint initiative involving the Office of University Relations and the Center for Student Enterprise. Kathryn F. Winsted, PhD, manages polling outreach, analysis, and operations, and serves as Associate Professor of Marketing and Director of the Center for Student Enterprise. Polling project support is provided by students from the Lubin School of Business through the Pace Connect program. About Pace University Pace University is a comprehensive, independent University with campuses in New York City and Westchester County. Nearly 13,000 students are enrolled in undergraduate and graduate degree programs in the Dyson College of Arts and Sciences, Lubin School of Business, Seidenberg School of Computer Science and Information Systems, School of Education, Elisabeth Haub School of Law, and College of Health Professions. www.pace.edu