THE FUTURE OF ALERTS. ADS-B Semin Mark Palm Thales Melbourn. Air Systems Division

Similar documents
SURVEILLANCE & ATM SYSTEMS :

Integration of surveillance in the ACC automation system

We are IntechOpen, the world s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists. International authors and editors

Examining the startle reflex, and impacts for radar-based Air Traffic Controllers. Andrew Ciseau

Trajectory Assessment Support for Air Traffic Control

Radar / ADS-B data fusion architecture for experimentation purpose

ATM-ASDE System Cassiopeia-5

ICAO AFI/MID ASBU IMPLEMENTATION WORKSHOP. Cairo, November 2015

An Approach to Fully Automatic Aircraft Collision Avoidance and Navigation

SURVEILLANCE DATA EXCHANGE. Part 17 : Category 4. Safety Net Messages

TCAS Functioning and Enhancements

This page is intentionally blank. GARMIN G1000 SYNTHETIC VISION AND PATHWAYS OPTION Rev 1 Page 2 of 27

Automatic Dependent Surveillance -ADS-B

Safety of advanced airborne self separation under very high en-route traffic demand

2 Flight Plans 1 Fill in the appropriate boxes 2 Find acceptable routes 3 Useful Newbie Comments

Interactive and Immersive 3D Visualization for ATC. Matt Cooper Norrköping Visualization and Interaction Studio University of Linköping, Sweden

Applying Multisensor Information Fusion Technology to Develop an UAV Aircraft with Collision Avoidance Model

EUROCONTROL Guidance Material for Area Proximity Warning Appendix D-1: Enhancement of APW for ATCC Semmerzake

Including Safety during Early Development Phases of Future ATM Concepts

ACAS Xu UAS Detect and Avoid Solution

Sense and Avoid: Analysis of Sensor Design Factors for Optimal Deconfliction

EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES OF THE EFFECT OF INTENT INFORMATION ON COCKPIT TRAFFIC DISPLAYS

Air Traffic Management System requirements for ADS-B

Visualization of Aircraft Approach and Departure Procedures in a Decision Support System for Controllers

RADAR AND ATM PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS SUITE (RAPAS)

10 Secondary Surveillance Radar

KMD 550/850. Traffic Avoidance Function (TCAS/TAS/TIS) Pilot s Guide Addendum. Multi-Function Display. For Software Version 01/13 or later

Copyrighted Material - Taylor & Francis

NETALERT - the Safety Nets newsletter BEEP - BEEP - BEEP! BEEP - BEEP - BEEP! BEEP - BEEP - BEEP!

Radar/Lidar Sensors SESAR XP1 Trials at CDG airport WakeNet-USA October 2012 Boeing, Seattle, USA

Potential co-operations between the TCAS and the ASAS

EUROPEAN ORGANISATION FOR THE SAFETY OF AIR NAVIGATION EUROCONTROL EUROCONTROL EXPERIMENTAL CENTRE CDG REAL-TIME SIMULATION RESULTS

GA and NextGen How technologies like WAAS and ADS-B will change your flying! Presented By Claire Kultgen

2. Radar receives and processes this request, and forwards it to Ground Datalink Processor (in our case named GRATIS)

SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS. Operational Improvement and Cost Savings, from Airport Surface to Airspace

Airmanship Knowledge Learning Outcome 1 Air Traffic Control

Technology Considerations for Advanced Formation Flight Systems

COMPARISON OF SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGIES ICAO

NDB Approach Background

Rockwell Collins ADS-B Perspective Bangkok March 2005

Use of Satellite-based Technologies to Enhance safety and efficiency in ATC and Airport Operation

ADS-B Performance. APANPIRG ADS-B TASK FORCE SEMINAR Nadi, Fiji. Greg Dunstone Technology Development. Airservices Australia. Airservices Australia

EUROCONTROL Specification

Interactive and Immersive 3D Visualization for ATC

Radar Operation Simulator & Editor

Applying Multisensor Information Fusion Technology to Develop an UAV Aircraft with Collision Avoidance Model

EMMA2 Operational Concept

Exam questions: AE3-295-II

ATM INDRA ADS-B SYSTEM AUTOMATIC DEPENDANT SURVEILLANCE BROADCAST JULY -2014

Analysis of anomalies in ADS B and its GPS data

An advisory circular may also include technical information that is relevant to the standards or requirements.

Operational Concept for a complete A-SMGCS

Rotary Wing DVE Solution Proof Of Concept Live Demonstration

The Alaska Air Carriers Association. Supports and Advocates for the Commercial Aviation Community

SESAR Wake vortex measurements by radar. First results of the campaign

We are IntechOpen, the world s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists. International authors and editors

AIREON SPACE-BASED ADS-B

Introduction to PBN and RNP

PBN Airspace & Procedures

Evaluation of ATC Working practice from a Safety and Human Factor perspective

Human Factors Implications of Continuous Descent Approach Procedures for Noise Abatement in Air Traffic Control

EUROCONTROL Specification for ATM Surveillance System Performance (Volume 2 Appendices)

Investigating Fundamental Issues in Lateral Conformance Monitoring Using a Fault Detection Approach

Jager UAVs to Locate GPS Interference

Boeing MultiScan ThreatTrack Weather Radar Frequently Asked Questions. The next generation moving map (Cover Tag Line) and cabin flight system

Empirical Test of Conflict Probability Estimation

Performance Based Surveillance & New Sensors technology

EMMA Project Update + Operational Concept for a complete A-SMGCS

ICAO SARPS AND GUIDANCE DOCUMENTS ON SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS

IMPLEMENTATION OF GNSS BASED SERVICES

An Integrated Safety Analysis Methodology for Emerging Air Transport Technologies

Presentation to CDW Niels Jernes Vej Aalborg E - Denmark - Phone:

AE4-393: Avionics Exam Solutions

Evolution from 3D to 4D radar

SUPPLEMENT REVISION CESSNA MODEL 182T

ATC-Wake: Integrated Air Traffic Control Wake Vortex Safety and Capacity System

Appendix E. Gulf Air Flight GF-072 Perceptual Study 23 AUGUST 2000 Gulf Air Airbus A (A40-EK) NIGHT LANDING

VOR/DME APPROACH WITH A320

[EN-048] Enhancing Wake Vortex Surveillance Capability Using Innovative Fusion Approaches

BEYOND RADAR ERA ATM SOLUTIONS

Cognitive conflicts in dynamic systems

Informal paper. An Overview of ADS. - Principles, Drivers, Activities, Technology and Standards - 1 June 1999, v1.0 EUROCONTROL

Objectives. Designing, implementing, deploying and operating systems which include hardware, software and people

Passive Radars as Sources of Information for Air Defence Systems

Bayesian Filter to accurately track airport moving objects

STC FLIGHT FUNCTIONAL TEST

Controls/Displays Relationship

MIDANPIRG CNS SG/7 Meeting Cairo, Egypt, 31May - 2June 2016

ICAO PBN GO TEAM PBN Implementation Workshop ENAC / ATM

Characteristics and spectrum considerations for sense and avoid systems use on unmanned aircraft systems

Be real; the effectiveness of avian radars! Addy Borst MSc

A Nuclear Plume Detection and Tracking Model for the Advanced Airborne Early Warning Surveillance Aircraft

Development and Evaluation of a Collision Avoidance Display for Supporting Pilots Decision Making in a Free Flight Environment

GPS System Design and Control Modeling. Chua Shyan Jin, Ronald. Assoc. Prof Gerard Leng. Aeronautical Engineering Group, NUS

United States Air Force Europe Bird Strike Hazard Reduction

New and Emerging Technologies

Guidance Material for ILS requirements in RSA

A LETTER HOME. The above letter was written in spring of 1918 by an American aviator flying in France.

Stanford Center for AI Safety

VATSIM CODE OF CONDUCT

Transcription:

THE FUTURE OF ALERTS ADS-B Semin Mark Palm Thales Melbourn

INTRODUCTION The Introduction of ADS-B provides scope for enhancing the current alert capabilities of ATM systems. New alerts can be grouped into the following categories: Inconsistency between ADS-B data and radar data, Inconsistency between ADS-B data and flight plan data, Possible improvements to existing alert functionality impact: Cleared Level Monitoring, Route Adherence Monitoring, Short Term Conflict Alert Minimum Safe Altitude Warning and Danger Area Infringement Warning.

NEW ALERTS: Inconsistency aircraft received data & aircraft derived data It is anticipated that the prime area for deriving new alerts in an ADS-B environment is in the comparison between ADS-B data and Radar data. Today many aircraft are detected simultaneously by radar and ADS-C transmissions. Soon aircraft will also be detected by ADS-B transmissions. The variety of sensor types provide multiple sources of data for the same aircraft. In the future, data from such multiple sources will be fused together, forming one system track that represents the physical aircraft. Fusion can take two forms: The fusion of multiple radar data sources, and The fusion of ADS-B data and radar data. An essential part of the process will be checking the data for inconsistencies during this fusion procedure.

NEW ALERTS: Data Fusion The simplest new alert will highlight inconsistencies between the derived and received position of the aircraft. This alert must have the capability to attempt to determine if the sensor or the aircraft position is incorrect. If an inconsistency is detected between all aircraft detected by a specific radar, the alert should be to a supervisor that the radar is faulty, however if we only have an inconsistency for one aircraft, then this should be reported to the responsible controller. Received data such as speed, heading or altitude can also be checked. One of the most useful new alerts could be the checking of reported versus measured speed of an aircraft. An error in the aircraft speed sensor could go undetected during normal Enroute flying, however during landing when the pilot needs a higher level of accuracy in the speed measurement, an error could have dramatic outcomes.

NEW ALERTS: Data Fusion Multiple Radar Environment Position from Radar 2 Position from Radar 1 Position from Radar 2 Position from Radar 3 Position from ADS-B Potential Problem with Radar 3 Potential Problem with Aircraft Data

NEW ALERTS: Data Fusion Single Radar Environment Positions from Radar Positions from Radar Positions from ADS-B Potential Problem with Radar Potential Problem with Aircraft Data

NEW ALERTS: Inconsistency aircraft received data & flight plan data The other source for deriving new alerts is in the comparison of ADS-B data and flight plan data registered in the ATM system. ARCW (Aircraft Route Conformance Warning) checks already the received ADS-C route data (which is entered in the Flight Management System of the aircraft) against the flight plan data entered in the ATM system, and can identify a possible problem well before it occurs. This can be readily expanded to include ADS-B data by comparing received ADS-B trajectory intent information against the flight plan data to determine if there are any inconsistencies. However, new surveillance technologies permit new types of alerts. For example, the ADS-B emitter category can be checked against the stored flight plan data. The controller believes he is in communication with a light aircraft when in fact it is a heavy aircraft. This could result in the controller giving the aircraft incorrect instructions.

NEW ALERTS: Improvements of Current Alerts ADS-B Data offers improvements to Radar data Improved Data Rate of 1 per second Direct Velocity Vector Information Radar Velocity vector can be up to 7seconds behind the actual aircraft vector Opportunity to use ADS-B information for Parallel Runway Monitoring Rate of Turn Information Rate of Climb/Decent Information Future Intent Information

NEW ALERTS: Improvements of Current Alerts

NEW ALERTS: Extensions to Current Alerts Short Term Conflict Alert The short-term conflict alert performs a linear extrapolation of the current position of aircraft based on their curren speed and heading in order to predict their future positions. If the aircraft are going to violate a separation standa for their current or future situation an alert is raised. ADS-B Data will provide Improved rate of update Quicker STCA Detection Reduced Tolerance's required for STCA Improved velocity vector information Less False STCA s in maneuvering aircraft Rate of Turn information STCA STCA ogether this will provide a improved STCA in Enroute and a quality STCA in Approac

Current Emergency Alerts General Emergency (7700), Radio Failure (7600) Hijack (7500), New ADS-B Alerts Lifeguard / Medical Emergency Minimum Fuel. NEW ALERTS: Extensions to Current Alerts Emergency Alerts

NEW ALERTS: Extensions to Current Alerts Cleared Level Adherence Monitoring ADS-B data received from an aircraft can include Intermediate State Selected Altitude Final State Selected Altitude data. This data immediately gives information about the intent of the pilot and can alert the controller to a potential problem much earlier.. ADS-B Potential Potential Clam Clam Raised Raised Radar Radar Clam Clam Raised Raised CFL Future Future Intent Intent Altitude Altitude received received in in ADS-B ADS-B data data Altitudes Altitudes received received in in radar radar tracks tracks

NEW ALERTS: Extensions to Current Alerts Route Adherence Monitoring ADS-B data will improve the RAM alerting in the following ways Improved rate of data, providing earlier RAM indication Improved velocity vector, providing more accurate RAM determination Rate of turn information improving the RAM determination algorithm Intent of the aircraft information increase the speed with which RAM alerts are raised.. RAM RAM ATCC ATCC flight flight plan plan Future Future Intent Intent corridor corridor route route information Received Received ADS-B ADS-B Potential Potential RAM RAM alert alert RADAR RADAR RAM RAM alert alert Aircraft Aircraft trajectory trajectory Positions Positions received received in in radar radar tracks tracks

NEW ALERTS: Extensions to Current Alerts Minimum Safe Altitude Warning Minimum Safe Altitude Warning can be improved in the same way as the Cleared Level Alert is improved by ADS-B intent information. And by the use of ADS-B Rate of Climb information. Minimum Minimum safe safe altitude altitude MSAW MSAW Look Look ahead ahead time time Aircraft Aircraft trajectory trajectory Terrain hazards / Obstacles Positions Positions received received in in radar radar tracks tracks

NEW ALERTS: Extensions to Current Alerts Danger Area Infringement Warning Danger Area Infringement Warning can be improved in the same way as the Route Adherence Monitoring alert is improved by ADS-B intent information. pper flight level Danger Danger area area Radar Radar DAIW DAIW Look Look ahead ahead time time Future Future Intent Intent information Received Received ADS-B Potenti DAIW DAIW Lower flight level Aircraft Aircraft trajectory trajectory Positions Positions received received in in radar radar tracks tracks

CONCLUSION Improvements to alerts and warning functions needs to be actively considered by the ATC community now, while suppliers are currently working with Air Navigation Service Providers to design algorithms for the data fusion of ADS and multiple derived data sources. Improvements to existing alerts and the development of new warnings and alerts must incorporate a range of issues Maintaining existing capabilities. Ensuring controllers do not suffer from over-alerting Integrity checks to ensure the accurate fusion of data from multiple sources. With the improvement of the quality of the alerts, provided by the more accurate and timely data available, the result is a safer ATC environment due to the enhanced controller awareness.

THE FUTURE OF ALERTS Mr Mark Palmer ATM Applications Specialist Melbourne, Australia mark.palmer@thalesatm.com Contact Details Mr Michel Procoudine Gorsky Business Development Manager Bagneux, France michel.procoudine@thalesatm.com

THE FUTURE OF ALERTS Thank you