ITU-T Study Group 5. EMF Environmental Characterization

Similar documents
Human Exposure Requirements for R&TTE and FCC Approval

ITU-T K.52. Guidance on complying with limits for human exposure to electromagnetic fields SERIES K: PROTECTION AGAINST INTERFERENCE

ITU-T K.70. Mitigation techniques to limit human exposure to EMFs in the vicinity of radiocommunication stations

ITU-T K.70. Mitigation techniques to limit human exposure to EMFs in the vicinity of radiocommunication stations

NIR MEASUREMENTS. Principles and practices of EMF characterization and measurements

Technical Committee106 Methods for the assessment of electric, magnetic and electromagnetic fields associated with human exposure

AT&T Mobility Proposed Base Station (Site No. CN4779A) 1101 Keaveny Court Walnut Creek, California

Safety Code 6 Compliance Analysis of NLA031. Study conducted by Eastlink, Radio Frequency Engineering Department

Verizon Wireless Proposed Base Station (Site No South Goleta ) 4500 Hollister Avenue Santa Barbara, California

Verizon Wireless Proposed Base Station (Site No Lake Cachuma ) 2680 Highway 154 Santa Barbara County, California

Royal Street Communications, LLC Proposed Base Station (Site No. LA0366A) 315 4th Avenue Venice, California

Calculated Radio Frequency Emissions Report. Cotuit Relo MA 414 Main Street, Cotuit, MA 02635

Verizon Wireless Proposed Base Station (Site No Berkeley Bekins ) 2721 Shattuck Avenue Berkeley, California

Safety Code 6 (SC6) Measurement Procedures (Uncontrolled Environment)

Mitigation of Radiation Levels for Base Transceiver Stations based on ITU-T Recommendation K.70

Simulation of Electromagnetic Radiation Levels for some Radiocommunication Systems

COMMON REGULATORY OBJECTIVES FOR WIRELESS LOCAL AREA NETWORK (WLAN) EQUIPMENT PART 2 SPECIFIC ASPECTS OF WLAN EQUIPMENT

ITU-D activities on EMF

RADIOFREQUENCY ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS

IOSH Webinar. Control of Electromagnetic Fields at work regulations 2016 Part 2 EMF exposure assessment 4 th May 2017 Julia Clark FSRP CMIOSH

Radio Frequency Exposure Test Report

Regulatory Framework for RF Safety in Mauritius

Safety Code 6 Analysis Freedom Mobile 3G & LTE Network. Radio frequency exposure for uncontrolled and controlled environment.

Verizon Wireless Proposed Base Station (Site No Palos Verdes ) 1506 Camino Verde Walnut Creek, California

Technical Note 2. Standards-compliant test of non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation on radar equipment

RADIO FREQUENCY NIER REPORT

Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Energy (RF-EME) Compliance Report

Area Network Applications] Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P It is

Digital Transmission Systems (DTSs), Frequency Hopping Systems (FHSs) and Licence-Exempt Local Area Network (LE-LAN) Devices

This is a preview - click here to buy the full publication

Technical Requirements for Fixed Radio Systems Operating in the Bands GHz and GHz

ELECTROMAGNETIC ENERGY (EME) EXPOSURE REPORT

Health Issues. Introduction. Ionizing vs. Non-Ionizing Radiation. Health Issues 18.1

Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Energy (RF-EME) Compliance Report

REGULATORY GUILDELINES FOR DEPLOYMENT OF BROADBAND SERVICES ON THE GHz BAND

Estimation of Peak Power Density in the Vicinity of Cellular Base Stations, FM, UHF and WiMAX Antennas

ECC Recommendation (16)04

CALCULATING RADIOFREQUENCY FIELD STRENGTH SAFETY CODE 6 SITE VALIDATION

Terrestrial Workshop Presentation FXM Exercises WRS BR/TSD/TPR International Telecommunication Union

SRSP-101 Issue 1 May Spectrum Management. Standard Radio System Plan

Product Compliance Assessments of Low Power Radio Base Stations with Respect to Whole-Body Radiofrequency Exposure Limits

EMF Compliance Assessments of 5G Devices

After having perused the Decree Law No. (31) of 2002 on Protection from Radiation,

2200 Noll Drive Lancaster, PA Latitude: N 40º (NAD 83) Longitude: W 76º (NAD 83) 362 AMSL

Radio Frequency Fields Survey at Waurn Ponds Campus Pigdons Road, Geelong, VIC For Deakin University. EMC Technologies Report No.

Fryderyk Lewicki, ITU-T SG5, Vice chairman WP2 Orange Polska, Poland

Challenges in standardization related to EMF compliance above 6 GHz

Regulatory Guidance and Safety Standards

Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) Overview Presented by Mark Jenkins and Vina Kerai. TÜV SÜD Product Service GmbH

Cell Phone and RF Safety Awareness

SAR REDUCTION IN SLOTTED PIFA FOR MOBILE HANDSETS USING RF SHIELD

Analysis of magnetic and electromagnetic field emissions produced by a MRI device

Brazil Experience and Activities Regarding Human Exposure to EMF

RF EME ANALYSIS REPORT TELSTRA CORPORATION LIMITED WIFI BASE CUBE LMR400 & RBK300

RF EMISSIONS COMPLIANCE REPORT. Verizon Wireless. Report Status: Verizon Wireless is Compliant

EMF ASSESSMENT REPORT

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R P Prediction of sky-wave field strength at frequencies between about 150 and khz

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

National Radiation Commission P.O.Box 743, Arusha, Tanzania.

ARTICLE 22. Space services 1

Measurements of Exposures Around Vodafone New Zealand Limited Cellsites from June 2012 to May 2013

Minimum Antenna Elevation for Specific Fraction of SC6 Limits Version 1.0 Standard May 7, 2009

Technical limits of Human Exposure to RF from Broadcasting Emitters, Cellular Base Stations and Handsets

SAR REPORT. TEST STANDARDS: FCC Part 15 Subpart C Intentional Radiator. ARRIS Model Spectrum 110A Set Top Box With Bluetooth (DSS) and RF4CE (DTS)

Radio Frequency Emissions Analysis Report Sprint Wireless Water Tank Facility

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

Technical Requirements for Fixed Line-of-Sight Radio Systems Operating in the Band MHz

EN 62479:2010 ASSESSMENT REPORT WIN CHANNEL ELECTRONICS (HK) CO., LTD

EN EMF REPORT For. Two way radio Model No.: RT-5R

Application Note No. 7 Radio Link Calculations (Link_Calc.xls)

SECTION 2 BROADBAND RF CHARACTERISTICS. 2.1 Frequency bands

Wireless Facility Radio Frequency Exposure Compliance Review

Technical Requirements for Fixed Line-of-Sight Radio Systems Operating in the Band GHz

RF EME ANALYSIS REPORT TELSTRA CORPORATION LIMITED WIFI BASE CUBE

EMC aspects associated to 5G networks

ELECTROMAGNETIC ENERGY (EME) EXPOSURE REPORT

Far-Field Effects with Human Head Evaluation of EM Emission

ETSI TR V1.1.1 ( )

Technical Requirements for Fixed Line-of-Sight Radio Systems Operating in the Band MHz

Occupational Exposure to Base Stations Compliance With EU Directive 2004/40/EC

Technical Requirements for Fixed Line-of-Sight Radio Systems Operating in the Band MHz

EU Standards dedicated Mobile and Base Station

Technical and operational characteristics of land mobile MF/HF systems

The Survey of Electromagnetic Environment near RF Transmitters

Report On. Radio Frequency Exposure Testing of the Winland Electronics, Inc. EnviroAlert Electronic Multi-Zone Environmental Alarm System

5G Implementation in Europe and CIS. Setting the scene on EMF and 5G. István Bozsóki

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R SF.1719

Prediction of building entry loss

NATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION AGENCY

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R S.1341*

Regulatory Authority of Bermuda report on

Electronic Communications Committee (ECC) within the European Conference of Postal and Telecommunications Administrations (CEPT)

Terrestrial Workshop on the Preparation of Notices for Fixed and Mobile Services

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R S.1512

Table 1: OoB e.i.r.p. limits for the MFCN SDL base station operating in the band MHz

UNIT Derive the fundamental equation for free space propagation?

Systems characteristics of automotive radars operating in the frequency band GHz for intelligent transport systems applications

Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) CHARACTERISTICS OF IEEE SYSTEMS IN MHz

8GHz RF EMF Strength Meter

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R S.1712

Transcription:

International Telecommunication Union EMF Environmental Characterization Jeffrey Boksiner Senior Consultant, Telcordia Technologies, Inc Workshop on: EMC, safety and EMF effects in telecommunications

o EMF Environmental Characterization Introduction o Approach of o Recommendation K.52 o o o o Basic principles Application examples Current and future efforts Additional slides 2

Introduction o Exposure of human being to Electromagnetic Fields (EMF) raises concerns of possible health effects o Radio transmitters used for telecommunication are proliferating o SG5 began to study a question on health effects of EMF in 1996 3

SG5 Approach o SG5 will provide guidance for compliance with EMF exposure limits o SG5 will not develop new limits o Operators should determine appropriate limits based on relevant national or international standards or national regulations 4

SG5 Approach o Study Period 1996-2000 Focus on the development of K.52 o Study Period 2000-2004 Radio-frequency environmental characterization and health effects related to mobile equipment and radio systems 5

EMF Exposure Standards o International ICNIRP, Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic and electromagnetic field (up to 300 GHz) Adopted in many countries Fundamental reference for K.52 Should be used unless a national standard takes precedence 6

Exposure Fundamentals o Two-tier exposure limits Controlled/occupational exposure General population/uncontrolled exposure Also called General Public exposure o Formulas for multiple exposures o Formulas for short-term exposures 7

ICNIRP Exposure Limits Power Density Limit for general public exposure Limit for occupational exposure Power Density (W/m 2 ) 100 10 1 10 100 1000 10000 100000 Frequency (MHz) 8

Achieving Compliance o Identify appropriate compliance limits o Perform exposure assessment for intentional transmitters only o If needed, perform by calculations or measurement 9

Achieving Compliance o If the EMF exposure assessment indicates that pertinent exposure limits may be exceeded in areas where people may be present, mitigation/avoidance measures should be applied 10

Achieving Compliance o Assessment should be performed as part of planning, licensing or commissioning Use basic criteria of K.52 (Annex B) and/or Use software simulation tools Can use database of transmitter and antenna parameters and locations 11

K.52 Exposure Classification o Compliance zone Potential exposure to EMF is below the applicable limits o Occupational zone Potential exposure to EMF is below the limits for occupational exposure but exceeds the limits for general public exposure o Exceedance zone Potential exposure to EMF exceeds the limits for both occupational and general public exposure 12

Mitigation Techniques o Occupational zone Restrict access to general public Physical barriers, lockout procedures or adequate signs can accomplish the access restriction Workers may be permitted to enter the area Workers entering the occupational zone should be informed 13

Mitigation Techniques o Exceedance zone Restrict access to workers and the general public If workers need to enter the area, take steps to control their exposure o Temporarily reduce the power of the emitter, o Controlling the duration of the exposure so that time-averaged exposure is within safety limits, o Use shielding or protective clothing 14

K.52 Analytical Method o K.52 Provides simple analytical method using far-field expressions Valid in far field region Conservative evaluation Key parameters Power, antenna pattern, antenna height, antenna azimuth and elevation Note if antenna pattern is not known o Use regulatory envelopes, or o ITU-R Reference patterns 15

Exposure Evaluation Examples o Frequency = 900 MHz Limit for general public = 4.5 W/m 2 o Power to antenna = 100 W o Reflection coefficient = 1 o Structures of the exceedance zones 16

Half-Wave Dipole 17

Point-Multipoint Reference Pattern o Omnidirectional, Maximum gain = 10 18

Multipoint Reference Pattern o Same pattern, output power = 1000 W 19

Multipoint Reference Pattern o Same pattern, output power = 100 W o Elevation tilt = -5 deg 20

Multipoint Reference Pattern o Same pattern, output power = 1000 W o Elevation tilt = -5 deg 21

Example Results o Exceedance zones near the antennas would require mitigation if accessible o For general public the area of concern is often at ground level 22

Exposure Evaluation Examples o Frequency = 2 GHz Limit for general public = 10 W/m 2 o Power to antenna = 0 dbw o Reflection coefficient = 1 o Structures of the exceedance zones 23

30-dB Reference Pattern for Fixed Service 24

Study Period 2001-2004 Question 3: Work Program Two new Recommendations 1. K.mes for tlc installations compliance to reference level: procedure, tools and instrumentation requirement 2. K.rt for radio terminals: compliance to basic limits, i.e. SAR 25

K.mes: Measurement and numerical prediction of EMF for tlc installations compliance with human exposure limits o o K.52: indications to perform an exposure assessment based on the evaluation of the electromagnetic field and on accessibility considerations K.mes defines tools, methods and procedures that can be used to achieve a reliable compliance assessment. It is intended to provide: Basic requirement for e.m. field measurement: methods, instruments, procedures Indications on numerical methods for exposure prediction 26

o K.rt: Mobile Phone and SAR Limits The goal: a Recommendation which provides harmonized indications on Definition of a conformance test SAR limits Procedure Calibration of E-field probe Setup 27

Q. 3: The Work Until Now o K.mes: measurement 75% o K.mes: calculation <10% o K.rt: nothing 28

Questions 29

Additional Material 30

National EMF Exposure Standards o USA FCC, 96-326, Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation ANSI/IEEE C95.1, Standard for Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 khz to 300 GHz 31

Exposure Fundamentals o The key quantity is the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) The time derivative of the incremental energy (dw) absorbed by (dissipated in) an incremental mass (dm) contained in a volume element (dv) of a given mass density (ρ m ) SAR = d dt dw dm = d dt 1 ρ m dw dv 32

Exposure Fundamentals o SAR is difficult to measure or predict Used for non-inform exposure or where the EMF is influenced by the presence of a body Used for handset exposure o Use levels for electric and magnetic field or power density derived from SAR limits o K.52 and this presentation use powerdensity limits 33

ICNIRP Exposure Limits Electric Field Limit for general public exposure Limit for occupational exposure Electric Field (V/m) 1000 100 10 0.001 0.1 10 1000 100000 Frequency (MHz) 34

Simultaneous Exposure to Multiple Sources o Multiple sources at different frequencies above 1 MHz E i is the electric field strength at frequency i E l,i is the reference limit at frequency i S i is the power density at frequency i S l,i is the reference limit at frequency i i i l, i 2 E i El, i Si 1 S 1 OR 35

Analytical Methods o K.52 Provides simple analytical method using farfield expressions S(R,θ, φ) is the power density in W/m 2 f(θ, φ) is the relative field pattern of the antenna EIRP is the EIRP of the antenna in W ρ is the absolute value of the reflection coefficient R is the distance to the putative exposed person EIRP 4πR 2 ( R θ, φ ) = (1 ρ) f ( θ, φ ) S +, 2 36

K.52 Analytical Method o Valid in far field region o Conservative evaluation o Key parameters Power, antenna pattern, antenna height, antenna azimuth and elevation h h Image antenna Antenna θ α θ R x Earth surface R Direction of maximum radiation O y 37

Antenna Patterns o Important for determination of exposure o Use manufacturers data o If unknown, Use regulatory envelopes, or ITU-R Reference patterns 38

Antenna Patterns o Basically two type Cylindrically symmetrical Dish-type antennas Separable in spherical coordinates Azimuthal pattern Elevation pattern Mobile or broadcast systems 39

Half-wave Dipole o Simple analytical example o Omnidirectional azimuthal pattern 40

Example Point to Multipoint o Omnidirectional azimuthal pattern o Reference pattern from the ITU Radio Regulations o Maximum gain = 10 41

Example Cylindrically- Symmetrical Pattern o Reference pattern from the from ITU- R Recommendation F.699 o Maximum gain = 30 42

Ground-Level Calculation θ h R x 2m S = (1 + ρ) 4π 2 f ( θ ) x 2 EIRP + ( h 2) 2 43

Power Density at Ground Level 10-dB Multipoint Reference Pattern, h = 3 m S (W/m 2 ) with 5 deg tilt without tilt x (m) 44

Power Density at Ground Level 10-dB Multipoint Reference Pattern, h = 20 m S (W/m 2 ) with 5 deg tilt without tilt x (m) 45

K.mes: Contents Measurement Numerical predictions 1. Instruments basic requirement (e.g. calibration factors, isotropy, linearity ) 2. Uncertainties 3. Procedures 4. Compliance and results analysis 1. Exceedance volume (see K.52) and punctual calculation 2. Propagation models (far field, near field ) 3. Ray-tracing techniques 46

K.mes Measurement Instrument Requirement (1) Characterization of: o Antenna factor (for frequency selective meas) k [ 1 ] m a = E V incident measured [ V ] m [ m] o Calibration Factor E CF = E incident measured [ V ] m [ V ] m As functions of frequency, amplitude 47

K.mes Measurement Instrument Requirement (2) o Amplitude linearity o Isotropic respond o Multiple sources integration: E tot = E f f 2 o Respond to Pulsed modulated signals (insted of simple continous wave) o 48

K.mes-Numerical Predictions o Applicability of numerical models Free space far field Free space near field Ray tracing: line of sight, reflected and diffracted contributes Full wave methods (FDTD, MOM, FEM ) o Topographic data base o Realistic analysis for the maximum radiated power 49