PACS. PACS Photometer glitch analysis on the electronics. Herschel. PACS Photometer glitch analysis on the electronics Page 1. K.

Similar documents
PACS. Photometer SPT during Commissioning Phase. Herschel. PACS Commissioning Phase FFT/SPT report Page 1

Issues with Photometer Data & How to Resolve them with HIPE Tools

PACS. Optimum detector bias settings for Ge:Ga detectors, Time constant: bias change spectrometer IMT 509

PACS photometry on extended sources

EFFECTS OF IONOSPHERIC SMALL-SCALE STRUCTURES ON GNSS

NHSC/PACS Web Tutorials Running PACS photometer pipelines. PACS 201 (for Hipe 5.0) Level 0 to Level 1 processing: From raw to calibrated data cubes

Temperature Dependent Dark Reference Files: Linear Dark and Amplifier Glow Components

WFC3/IR Cycle 19 Bad Pixel Table Update

NHSC/PACS Web Tutorials Running PACS photometer pipelines PACS-201

A repository of precision flatfields for high resolution MDI continuum data

Basic principles of PACS photometer data reduc7on

Update on SPIRE Photometer Pipeline

Why Single Dish? Why Single Dish? Darrel Emerson NRAO Tucson

Interpixel crosstalk in a 3D-integrated active pixel sensor for x-ray detection

How to Setup a Real-time Oscilloscope to Measure Jitter

Direct Dark Matter Search with XMASS --- modulation analysis ---

Why Single Dish? Darrel Emerson NRAO Tucson. NAIC-NRAO School on Single-Dish Radio Astronomy. Green Bank, August 2003.

Target Echo Information Extraction

Image Extraction using Image Mining Technique

Digital Image Processing. Digital Image Fundamentals II 12 th June, 2017

Some plots from March 2007 tests related to bolometer PSF

Testo SuperResolution the patent-pending technology for high-resolution thermal images

Impulse noise features for automatic selection of noise cleaning filter

CCD reductions techniques

PQ Data Applications in Con Edison

WFC3 TV3 Testing: IR Channel Nonlinearity Correction

Physics Experiment N -17. Lifetime of Cosmic Ray Muons with On-Line Data Acquisition on a Computer

Why Single Dish? Darrel Emerson NRAO Tucson. NAIC-NRAO School on Single-Dish Radio Astronomy. Green Bank, August 2003.

NON UNIFORM BACKGROUND REMOVAL FOR PARTICLE ANALYSIS BASED ON MORPHOLOGICAL STRUCTURING ELEMENT:

restoration-interpolation from the Thematic Mapper (size of the original

Pulse Shape Analysis for a New Pixel Readout Chip

A Combined Multi-Temporal InSAR Method: Incorporating Persistent Scatterer and Small Baseline Approaches. Andy Hooper University of Iceland

Comparison Between Scrambled and X-Y Crosswire Readout Techniques

Processing ACA Monitor Window Data

Image Processing (EA C443)

Processing data collected with Pilatus/Eiger detectors. James Parkhurst IUCR Computing School, Bangalore, August 2017

1. (a) Explain the process of Image acquisition. (b) Discuss different elements used in digital image processing system. [8+8]

I have mostly minor issues, but one is major and will require additional analyses:

Background Pixel Classification for Motion Detection in Video Image Sequences

Jitter Analysis Techniques Using an Agilent Infiniium Oscilloscope

WFC3 SMOV Program 11433: IR Internal Flat Field Observations

Geometric Quality Assessment of CBERS-2. Julio d Alge Ricardo Cartaxo Guaraci Erthal

A 2 to 4 GHz Instantaneous Frequency Measurement System Using Multiple Band-Pass Filters

Final Long-Term Duty Cycle Report Primary Frequency Response (PFR) Duty Cycle Battery Pack: EnerDel, Channel 4 and Battery Module: A123 #5, Channel 1

Ultrasonic Time-of-Flight Shift Measurements in Carbon Composite Laminates Containing Matrix Microcracks

Astronomy 341 Fall 2012 Observational Astronomy Haverford College. CCD Terminology

Lightning observations from space: Time and space characteristics of optical events. Ullrich Finke, FH Hannover 5 th December, 2007

SPIRE Broad-Band Photometry Extraction

What an Observational Astronomer needs to know!

What is image enhancement? Point operation

A k-mean characteristic function to improve STA/LTA detection

M67 Cluster Photometry

CoE4TN4 Image Processing. Chapter 3: Intensity Transformation and Spatial Filtering

Padova and Asiago Observatories

On-Orbit Radiometric Performance of the Landsat 8 Thermal Infrared Sensor. External Editors: James C. Storey, Ron Morfitt and Prasad S.

SIMULATIONS OF ADAPTIVE ALGORITHMS FOR SPATIAL BEAMFORMING

Recursive Sequences. EQ: How do I write a sequence to relate each term to the previous one?

Interpixel Capacitance in the IR Channel: Measurements Made On Orbit

National Radio Channels. PPM measurement October 2017

X-RAY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY

Timing accuracy of the GEO 600 data acquisition system

Clock Measurements Using the BI220 Time Interval Analyzer/Counter and Stable32

Total Absorption Dual Readout Calorimetry R&D

Lecture 5. Telescopes (part II) and Detectors

Spatially Adaptive Algorithm for Impulse Noise Removal from Color Images

Analysis of the electrical disturbances in CERN power distribution network with pattern mining methods

Digital Image Processing

White-light interferometry, Hilbert transform, and noise

New Metrics Developed for a Complex Cepstrum Depth Program

Scintillators as an external trigger for cathode strip chambers

BACCARAT: A LONGITUDINAL MICRO-STUDY

J. E. Brau, N. B. Sinev, D. M. Strom University of Oregon, Eugene. C. Baltay, H. Neal, D. Rabinowitz Yale University, New Haven

WFC3 TV2 Testing: UVIS Shutter Stability and Accuracy

Low noise readout techniques for Charge Coupled Devices (CCD) Gustavo Cancelo, Juan Estrada, Guillermo Fernandez Moroni, Ken Treptow, Ted Zmuda

NHSC/PACS Web Tutorials Running the PACS Spectrometer pipeline for CHOP/NOD Mode. PACS-301 Level 0 to 1 processing

FIBER OPTICS. Prof. R.K. Shevgaonkar. Department of Electrical Engineering. Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay. Lecture: 22.

Experiment 5.A. Basic Wireless Control. ECEN 2270 Electronics Design Laboratory 1

STREAK DETECTION ALGORITHM FOR SPACE DEBRIS DETECTION ON OPTICAL IMAGES

Multiple Frequency Eddy Current Technique

AUTOMATED INSPECTION SYSTEM OF ELECTRIC MOTOR STATOR AND ROTOR SHEETS

THE OFFICINE GALILEO DIGITAL SUN SENSOR

A JOINT MODULATION IDENTIFICATION AND FREQUENCY OFFSET CORRECTION ALGORITHM FOR QAM SYSTEMS

Improving the Detection of Near Earth Objects for Ground Based Telescopes

Spectral Analysis of the LUND/DMI Earthshine Telescope and Filters

Use of the Shutter Blade Side A for UVIS Short Exposures

A Modular Readout System For A Small Liquid Argon TPC Carl Bromberg, Dan Edmunds Michigan State University

Testing the Electronics for the MicroBooNE Light Collection System

Soft X-ray sensitivity of a photon-counting hybrid pixel detector with a Silicon sensor matrix.

Classification-based Hybrid Filters for Image Processing

The Use of Non-Local Means to Reduce Image Noise

Design of Practical Color Filter Array Interpolation Algorithms for Cameras, Part 2

Chapter 2 Channel Equalization

GENERALIZATION: RANK ORDER FILTERS

X-ray Spectroscopy Laboratory Suresh Sivanandam Dunlap Institute for Astronomy & Astrophysics, University of Toronto

saac ewton roup ed maging etector

Guitar Music Transcription from Silent Video. Temporal Segmentation - Implementation Details

Autocorrelator Sampler Level Setting and Transfer Function. Sampler voltage transfer functions

ARRAY CONTROLLER REQUIREMENTS

FLAT FIELD DETERMINATIONS USING AN ISOLATED POINT SOURCE

Updates on the neutral atmosphere inversion algorithms at CDAAC

Transcription:

PACS Photometer glitch analysis on the electronics Page 1 PACS Photometer glitch analysis on the electronics K. Okumura

PACS Photometer glitch analysis on the electronics Page 2 Req. 1.1.9bis Glitches on electronics components 1.1.9bis - A. History Version Date Author(s) Change description 1.0 13 SEP 2010 K.Okumura First issue 1.1.9bis - B. Summary At the beginning of the mission up to OD 160, we used the stabilisation time after switch on to measure the reference voltage VRL. Those measurements are affected by the slow stabilisation of the signal, but some usefull information can still be found in those data. Here we use those data to asses the glitch behaviour on electronics. 1.1.9bis - C. Data Reference Sheet Table 1: Data used for the analyses OD date OBSID comment 026 09 Jun 2009 1342178014 064 17 Jul 2009 1342180037 065 18 Jul 2009 1342180117 067 20 Jul 2009 1342180136 072 25 Jul 2009 1342180669 073 26 Jul 2009 1342180761 086 08 Aug 2009 1342181644 092 14 Aug 2009 1342182091 093 15 Aug 2009 1342182234 096 18 Aug 2009 1342182403 101 23 Aug 2009 1342182610 104 26 Aug 2009 1342182822 107 29 Aug 2009 1342182942 110 01 Sep 2009 1342183024 120 11 Sep 2009 1342183649 124 15 Sep 2009 1342183877 128 19 Sep 2009 1342183989 no data 132 23 Sep 2009 1342184263 139 30 Sep 2009 1342184570 157 18 Oct 2009 1342186088 160 21 Oct 2009 1342186131 1.1.9bis - D. Test Description Right after the switch on of the PACS photometer, the detectors need about 35 minutes to stabilise. We take advantage of this stabilisation time to measure the signal coming out of the reference voltage VRL. This signal does not include the bolometer. However, the signal can be affected by the cosmic ray impacts on the electronics components and can contain some electronics specific glitches.

PACS Photometer glitch analysis on the electronics Page 3 1.1.9bis - E. Results In the signal from the reference voltage VRL there is no glitch comparable to the short time constant glitches seen on the bolometer signal (Fig. 1). However, glitches of long term recovery can be detected with a much less occurrence. Typical examples of those long therm glitches are shown in Figs. 2, where one observes negative glitches as well as positive ones. Figure 1: A typical example of the VRL signal after the bolometer switch on and during the stabilisation. No usual glitch is seen. In order to detect this type of signal behaviour the usual deglitching algorithm does not work in a optimum way. Here the detection is performed by a fixed threshold of the absolute value of the derivative of the signal. The threshold was fixed here to 10 times the standard deviation around the median value of the derivative of the signal. The number of detected glitches using this method is on average 33 over roughly 30 minutes on the whole blue detector area. Taking this small amount of glitches into account, one can construct a global view of the glitches over this time interval by looking at the largest glitch by pixel. A map of the time of impact can be constructed by mapping the frame number of the largest glitch for each pixel. This map allows to see the coincidence of the glitch on several pixels and their spatial distribution. Another map can also be constructed to show the amplitude of the largest glitch detected on each pixel, which allows to see, in particular, if the glitches are positive or negative. Figs. 3 to Figs. 22 show those maps for all the available data from OD26 to OD160. One thing is clearly noticeable in these maps: the pixels on the 11th line of the matrix 6 (upper inner left of the blue array) are almost always detected as glitches. This systematic detection suggest that this is not due to cosmic ray hits, but rather to the electric noise of this readout address.

PACS Photometer glitch analysis on the electronics Page 4 Figure 2: Example of glitches. [Top] typical positive and negative glitches, [Middle] glitches of a relatively large amplitude, [Bottom left] successive glitches (the first one affects only this pixel whereas the second one is seen on 16 pixels of the same readout address, [Bottom right] this should be considered rather as electric noise (see hereafter)

PACS Photometer glitch analysis on the electronics Page 5 Figure 3: Global view of the glitches OD 26. [Left] the frame sequence number where the largest glitch is detected, [Right] the amplitude in volts of the corresponding glitch, [Top] blue, [Bottom] red Figure 4: Global view of the glitches on OD 64. [Left] the frame sequence number where the largest glitch is detected, [Right] the amplitude in volts of the corresponding glitch, [Top] blue, [Bottom] red

PACS Photometer glitch analysis on the electronics Page 6 Figure 5: Global view of the glitches on OD 65. [Left] the frame sequence number where the largest glitch is detected, [Right] the amplitude in volts of the corresponding glitch, [Top] blue, [Bottom] red Figure 6: Global view of the glitches on OD 67. [Left] the frame sequence number where the largest glitch is detected, [Right] the amplitude in volts of the corresponding glitch. The result is only on the blue side, for no glitch was detected on the red side.

PACS Photometer glitch analysis on the electronics Page 7 Figure 7: Global view of the glitches on OD 72. [Left] the frame sequence number where the largest glitch is detected, [Right] the amplitude in volts of the corresponding glitch [Top] blue, [Bottom] red Figure 8: Global view of the glitches on OD 73. [Left] the frame sequence number where the largest glitch is detected, [Right] the amplitude in volts of the corresponding glitch. The result is only on the blue side, for no glitch was detected on the red side.

PACS Photometer glitch analysis on the electronics Page 8 Figure 9: Global view of the glitches on OD 86. [Left] the frame sequence number where the largest glitch is detected, [Right] the amplitude in volts of the corresponding glitch, [Top] blue, [Bottom] red Figure 10: Global view of the glitches on OD 92. [Left] the frame sequence number where the largest glitch is detected, [Right] the amplitude in volts of the corresponding glitch, [Top] blue, [Bottom] red

PACS Photometer glitch analysis on the electronics Page 9 Figure 11: Global view of the glitches on OD 93. [Left] the frame sequence number where the largest glitch is detected, [Right] the amplitude in volts of the corresponding glitch, [Top] blue, [Bottom] red Figure 12: Global view of the glitches on OD 96. [Left] the frame sequence number where the largest glitch is detected, [Right] the amplitude in volts of the corresponding glitch, [Top] blue, [Bottom] red

PACS Photometer glitch analysis on the electronics Page 10 Figure 13: Global view of the glitches on OD 101. [Left] the frame sequence number where the largest glitch is detected, [Right] the amplitude in volts of the corresponding glitch, [Top] blue, [Bottom] red Figure 14: Global view of the glitches on OD 104. [Left] the frame sequence number where the largest glitch is detected, [Right] the amplitude in volts of the corresponding glitch, [Top] blue, [Bottom] red

PACS Photometer glitch analysis on the electronics Page 11 Figure 15: Global view of the glitches on OD 107. [Left] the frame sequence number where the largest glitch is detected, [Right] the amplitude in volts of the corresponding glitch. The result is only on the blue side, for no glitch was detected on the red side. Figure 16: Global view of the glitches on OD 110. [Left] the frame sequence number where the largest glitch is detected, [Right] the amplitude in volts of the corresponding glitch, [Top] blue, [Bottom] red

PACS Photometer glitch analysis on the electronics Page 12 Figure 17: Global view of the glitches on OD 120. [Left] the frame sequence number where the largest glitch is detected, [Right] the amplitude in volts of the corresponding glitch, [Top] blue, [Bottom] red Figure 18: Global view of the glitches on OD 124. [Left] the frame sequence number where the largest glitch is detected, [Right] the amplitude in volts of the corresponding glitch, [Top] blue, [Bottom] red

PACS Photometer glitch analysis on the electronics Page 13 Figure 19: Global view of the glitches on OD 132. [Left] the frame sequence number where the largest glitch is detected, [Right] the amplitude in volts of the corresponding glitch, [Top] blue, [Bottom] red Figure 20: Global view of the glitches on OD 139. [Left] the frame sequence number where the largest glitch is detected, [Right] the amplitude in volts of the corresponding glitch, [Top] blue, [Bottom] red

PACS Photometer glitch analysis on the electronics Page 14 Figure 21: Global view of the glitches on OD 157. [Left] the frame sequence number where the largest glitch is detected, [Right] the amplitude in volts of the corresponding glitch, [Top] blue, [Bottom] red Figure 22: Global view of the glitches on OD 160. [Left] the frame sequence number where the largest glitch is detected, [Right] the amplitude in volts of the corresponding glitch, [Top] blue, [Bottom] red

PACS Photometer glitch analysis on the electronics Page 15 In fact a typical signal of one of these pixel looks like in Fig. 23, where the signal level skips suddenly on slightly a lower level from time to time and then skips back to the previous level. If we look at the average value of the number of detected glitches, it is 40 for the blue and 7 for the red. The geometrical retio of detector surface being 4, the glitch detection is higher for the blue than the red. If we subtract all the detection on the 11 th line of the matrix 6, we obtain 29 instead of 40 and the ratio 29/7 is nearly 4. Figure 23: The pixels in the 11th line of the matrix 6 are always detected as glitches. These detection are too systematic to consider them as due to cosmic ray hits. It should be considered as electric noise due to a instable electronics on this address. Now taking into account this false detection, we can remove all the detection on the line 11 of the matrix 6, without introducing too much bias because of the small number of glitches. Figs. 24 show the number of detected glitches corrected by the electric noise. The fluctuation of the glitches in time does not correlate between blue and red detectors. Coming back to the glitch maps, some features are easily noticeable. There are glitches affecting only one pixel There are glitches affecting a set of pixels of the same readout address There are as many positive as negative glitches in both cases Figs. 25 to Figs. 34 show a set of glitches occurred on a same readout address. In the data of OD26, the pixel [28,3] shows an noise similar to that of the line 11 of the matrix 6. The same kind of noise can be also seen on the line 31 of the matrix 1 on OD160.

PACS Photometer glitch analysis on the electronics Page 16 Figure 24: Number of detected glitches. [Left] Blue and [Right] Red Ideally the statistics of the glitch rate of those different features are supposed to reflect the geometrical cross section of electric componets. This correspondance should be studied further in detail. 1.1.9bis - F. Conclusions The observed glitches on the reference signal VRL consist of two groups. The ones which affect symaltaniously the pixels of one readout address and those which affect only one independent pixel at the same time. 1.1.9bis - G. IA scripts used / remarks on PCSS glitchesvrl.py glitchesvrlstat.py

PACS Photometer glitch analysis on the electronics Page 17 Figure 25: Glitches of a same readout address on the matrix 1

PACS Photometer glitch analysis on the electronics Page 18 Figure 26: Glitches of a same readout address on the matrix 2

PACS Photometer glitch analysis on the electronics Page 19 Figure 27: Glitches of a same readout address on the matrix 3 Figure 28: Glitches of a same readout address on the matrix 4

PACS Photometer glitch analysis on the electronics Page 20 Figure 29: Glitches of a same readout address on the matrix 5

PACS Photometer glitch analysis on the electronics Page 21 Figure 30: Glitches of a same readout address on the matrix 6

PACS Photometer glitch analysis on the electronics Page 22 Figure 31: Glitches of a same readout address on the matrix 7

PACS Photometer glitch analysis on the electronics Page 23 Figure 32: Glitches of a same readout address on the matrix 8

PACS Photometer glitch analysis on the electronics Page 24 Figure 33: Glitches of a same readout address on the red matrix 9

PACS Photometer glitch analysis on the electronics Page 25 Figure 34: Glitches of a same readout address on the red matrix 10