Georgia s Regional Traffic Operations Program

Similar documents
EVALUATING AN ADAPTIVE SIGNAL CONTROL SYSTEM IN GRESHAM. James M. Peters, P.E., P.T.O.E., Jay McCoy, P.E., Robert Bertini, Ph.D., P.E.

MACOMB COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ROADS TRAFFIC OPERATIONS CENTER PERFORMANCE MEASURES. August 2017

Roadmap to Successful Deployment of Adaptive Systems

I-85 Integrated Corridor Management. Jennifer Portanova, PE, CPM Sreekanth Sunny Nandagiri, PE, PMP

OPAC Adaptive Engine Pinellas County Deployment

Validation Plan: Mitchell Hammock Road. Adaptive Traffic Signal Control System. Prepared by: City of Oviedo. Draft 1: June 2015

AUTOMATED TRAFFIC SIGNAL PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Getting Through the Green: Smarter Traffic Management with Adaptive Signal Control

Adaptive Signal System Mt. Juliet, TN. SR-171 (Mt. Juliet Road)

0-6920: PROACTIVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING AND COORDINATION FOR CONGESTION MITIGATION ON ARTERIAL ROADS. TxDOT Houston District

PennDOT District 6-0 Signal Retiming Initiative The Route 611 Story

Signal Patterns for Improving Light Rail Operation By Wintana Miller and Mark Madden DKS Associates

Update on Traffic Results and Findings

King Mill Lambert DRI# 2035 Henry County, Georgia

Columbus Computerized Traffic Signal System

Arterial Connected Vehicle Test Bed Deployment and Lessons Learned

Minnesota Department of Transportation Rural Intersection Conflict Warning System (RICWS) Reliability Evaluation

WHITE PAPER BENEFITS OF OPTICOM GPS. Upgrading from Infrared to GPS Emergency Vehicle Preemption GLOB A L TRAFFIC TE CHNOLOGIE S

Connected Vehicles and Maintenance Operations

Joint OCTEC / ITS-CA Southern Section Luncheon Meeting. February 22, 2018

Assessing the Performance of Integrated Corridor Management (ICM) Strategies

Signal Performance Metrics Charlie Wetzel, PE, PTOE

2015 GDOT PowerPoint. Title Page

Traffic Signal System Upgrade Needs

FINAL DRAFT. Prepared for: Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments. May 29, 2002

Next Generation Traffic Control with Connected and Automated Vehicles

Communications Design Challenges for the Edmonton North LRT Extension

Adaptive Signal Control in Tyler Texas

Deploying Transit Signal Priority Systems

CHAPTER 28 ACTIVATING/DEACTIVATING A SIGNAL

MOBILITY RESEARCH NEEDS FROM THE GOVERNMENT PERSPECTIVE

1 of REV:0

San Antonio Wrong Way Driver Initiative

Model Deployment Overview. Debby Bezzina Senior Program Manager University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute

Linking TransCAD to Synchro Micro-simulation

ACS-Lite. The Next Generation of Traffic Signal Control. Eddie Curtis, FHWA HOTM / Resource Center February 28, 2007

COUNTYWIDE TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES STUDY

Traffic Solutions. How to Test FCD Monitoring Solutions: Performance of Cellular-Based Vs. GPS-based systems

Just Announced! General Registration : Includes all three days of Technical Sessions, $150 for Florida Section Members / $300 for Nonmembers

City of Orlando Alpha Test July 10, 2000

Integrated Corridor Management. Brian Cronin USDOT ITS Joint Program Office October 14, 2014

Technical Memorandum# TM2

INNOVATIVE DEPLOYMENT OF DYNAMIC MESSAGE SIGNS IN SAFETY APPLICATIONS

Transit Signal Priority (TSP) System Replacement Concept Detail and Technical Requirements

VALIDATION OF LINK TRAVEL TIME USING GPS DATA: A Case Study of Western Expressway, Mumbai

Appendix CANADA / Québec Montréal tunnels Ville-Marie & Viger

UDOT AUTOMATED TRAFFIC SIGNAL PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Collin Castle. NOCoE Regional Forum Session 1: Innovation and Emerging Technologies September 13th, 2016

Using Multimodal Performance Measures to Prioritize Improvements on US 101 in San Luis Obispo County

Area Traffic Control System (ATCS)

City of Surrey Adaptive Signal Control Pilot Project

2-800 MHz CCCS Sys Extension

FINAL REPORT IMPROVING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TRAFFIC MONITORING BASED ON WIRELESS LOCATION TECHNOLOGY. Michael D. Fontaine, P.E. Research Scientist

Public School Facilities Element

Abilene District Traffic Signal Timing and Capacity Analysis

PALMETTO 800 History Project Cost

Evaluation of Actuated Right Turn Signal Control Using the ITS Radio Communication System

CHAPTER 2C - PRELIMINARY DESIGN. General... 2C-1. Review of Work Load... 2C-2 Establishing Priorities... 2C-2

9-800 MHz Countywide Coordinated Communications System (CCCS) Upgrade

WSDOT LED Adaptive Roadway Lighting & Illumination Reform

EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS

Currently 2 vacant engineer positions (1 Engineer level, 1 Managing Engineer level)

CHAPTER 14: TRAFFIC SIGNAL STANDARDS Introduction and Goals Administration Standards Standard Attachments 14.

Managing traffic through Signal Performance Measures in Pima County

Traffic Operations Division. FY Budget Presentation

Complete Streets & PPM to FDM Update

Vehicle speed and volume measurement using V2I communication

DE 8 Concept Plan and Operations Study. City of Dover Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee Meeting December 1, 2008

REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY RESOLUTION NO BACKGROUND AND COMMENTS. Agenda Item: No. 4. No. 7C-1

Frequently Asked Questions

Design Guidelines for Deploying Closed Loop Systems

Adaptive signal Control. Tom Mathew

Context Aware Dynamic Traffic Signal Optimization

I. Travel Time Determinations on London Bridge Road and_i-264 Corridor using of Bluetooth Detection Devices

Preparing for an Uncertain Future:

Appendix Traffic Engineering Checklist - How to Complete. (Refer to Template Section for Word Format Document)

Integrated Corridor Management (ICM) Planning Study. MPO Presentation September 8, 2016

Application of Dynamic Traffic Assignment (DTA) Model to Evaluate Network Traffic Impact during Bridge Closure - A Case Study in Edmonton, Alberta

Synthesis Study of Texas Signal Control Systems: Technical Report

Guidelines for the Preparation of ITS & Signal Plans by Private Engineering Firms

Pennsylvania STARNet NASCIO Awards Information Communications Technology Innovation Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

State. Alabama. Arizona. Arkansas. Delaware. Florida. Idaho. Illinois. Iowa. Michigan. New Hampshire. New Mexico

NCTCOG Regional Travel Model Improvement Experience in Travel Model Development and Data Management. Presented to TMIP VMTSC.

ENTERPRISE Transportation Pooled Fund Study TPF-5 (231)

REGIONAL TRAFFIC SIGNAL RETIMING PROGRAM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

ADAPTIVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONTROL PILOT PROJECT FOR THE CITY OF SURREY

UTAH S EXPERIENCE WITH AUTOMATED TRAFFIC SIGNAL PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Smart Cities. Wednesday, May 16, :30 a.m. - 12:00 p.m. (EDT) What is a smart city? Are we ready for it? What are the challenges?

Connected Car Networking

DAS Solutions. Delivering coverage and capacity in today s challenging environments

FDOT Voice Radio Communications and Microwave Network

State Road A1A North Bridge over ICWW Bridge

Lessons Learned from 10-Years of Operating Transit Signal Priority on Howard Street, in Baltimore, Maryland: It s Not Just About the Technology

Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas

Transportation Tuesdays Online Fourth in webinar series for transit CEOs & board members on economic sustainability March 6, 2012

Capability Statement

CONNECTED VEHICLE-TO-INFRASTRUCTURE INITATIVES

City of Calgary, Alberta

1. Travel time measurement using Bluetooth detectors 2. Travel times on arterials (characteristics & challenges) 3. Dealing with outliers 4.

Applicability of Adaptive Traffic Control Systems in Nevada s Urban Areas

Transcription:

Georgia s Regional Traffic Operations Program Shahram Malek, PhD, PE Vice President, ARCADIS US Inc. Regional Traffic Operations Project Manager Koushik Arunachalam, PE Associate Project Manager, ARCADIS US Inc.

Traffic Signals Poor signal timing 5 to 10 percent of all traffic delay 295 million vehicle-hours of delay on major roadways 9000 Traffic Signals Over 50% located in the Atlanta Region

Who Operates the Traffic Signals? 9000 Signals Statewide Maintaining Agencies: 7 GDOT Districts 54 Counties 36 Cities Top 5 maintaining agencies: GDOT: 2417 signals City of Atlanta: 975 signals Gwinnett County: 674 signals DeKalb County: 661 signals Cobb County: 543 signals

Atlanta Region s Signal Operators In most major metropolitan areas: State DOT manages the freeway network Local agencies manage arterials In Atlanta: 4 GDOT Districts 15 Counties 22 Cities

ITS Projects STC 6 PM STC 1 STC 2 ATC Contractor STC 3 STC 4 LED Display Upgrades GDOT Count Data Loop Contractor 1 Loop Contractor 2 STC 5 Signal Maintenance Contractor Timing Contracts Traffic Engineer Local Agencies Loop Contracts Signal Shop CID

ITS Projects PM STC 6 STC 1 STC 2 ATC Contractor STC 3 STC 4 LED Display Upgrades GDOT Count Data Loop Contractor 1 Loop Contractor 2 STC 5 Signal Maintenance Contractor Timing Contracts Traffic Engineer Local Agencies Loop Contracts Signal Shop CID

RTOP s Role Traffic Signal Maintenance and Repair Issues Regional Focus Mainline Priority Cross-Jurisdictional Actively Manage Traffic Flow Mission: To increase travel throughput by minimizing congestion and reducing delays along regional commuter corridors through improved signal operations.

RTOP Partners

Memorandum of Understanding Responsibilities GDOT GDOT Lead Local Agency Corridor Traffic Signal Timing GDOT Local Lead Local Agency Timing Adjustments * Preventative/Routine Maintenance After Hours/Emergency Response Detector, Communication, and Surveillance Repair Actively Manage and Monitor (Peak Hours) Major Repair *Subject to GDOT approval Georgia s Regional Signal Operations Program 9

Regionally Significant Corridors Phase 1 June 9, 2010 Phase 2 October 27, 2010 Phase 3 January 4, 2013 Phase 4 October 15, 2013

What have we been doing? Preventative/Routine maintenance Repair of equipment Operational Improvements Communications to traffic signals Surveillance at key locations Active signal timing adjustments Technology evaluation/deployment Georgia s Regional Signal Operations Program 11

Percent Operational Equipment Repair Operational Detection 100% 95% Program Goal 90% 85% 80% Vehicle Detection 75% Pedestrian Detection 70%

Equipment Repair Vehicle Detectors 2,150 Replaced 537 Repaired Pedestrian Detectors 1,394 Replaced 248 Repaired PM Program Ground Testing Georgia s Regional Signal Operations Program 13

Remote Communications RTOP connected signals to the GDOT TMC Full intersection control Accessible to GDOT (610) Accessible to Locals (56) No remote communications (84)

Communications Plan

Communications Plan

Remote Communications Status Monitoring Detector Diagnostics

Traffic Responsive Operation

When Signal Timing Just Isn t Enough Applications of Synchro and VISSIM to evaluate alternatives Operational Improvements Turn lane additions Phasing changes Lane Diets Indirect Lefts Tool selection based on needs Complex intersections require VISSIM (weaves, closely spaced signals) Corridor level changes can be done in Synchro (turn lane addition, lane diets)

Surveillance Currently have 113 CCTV monitoring about 1/2 of the assigned corridors Planned expansion covers all routes and increases the CCTV count to 275 Additionally we are now adding new hardware to bring back all IVDS back to TMC/TCCs 21

Active Management (before remote communication) Limited to: Major Events Planned Events Incidents lasting longer than one peak period

Active Management Control from a single location AM Peak 6 AM to 10 AM PM Peak 3 PM to 7 PM Response to any event C2C signal system Video sharing

Firsts Shared Communication Network RNET Program Based Technology Evaluation Cloud Based Traffic Signal System Citrix Successful TR operation in GA Across Jurisdiction Boundaries Video Sharing Architecture Ethernet over Copper Wireless Ethernet IP-based CCTV Retroreflective Backplates Deployments of Flashing Yellow Arrow

Program Benefits Spring 2013 comparison to baseline Reduced number of stops by 4% Reduced stopped time delay by.1% Traffic volumes increased by 10.8%

Other Traffic Operational Programs GDOT has provided seed money Community Improvement Districts to Implement Three Programs Perimeter CIDs Midtown Alliance Downtown

Lessons Learned Understanding RTOP s Role and achieving understanding with our stakeholders Understanding of stakeholders needs, resources, and objective Improved maintenance Better timings Balanced operation / significant generators Budget constraints (manpower, equipment, technology) Grasping the state of the infrastructure Detection (vehicular and pedestrian) Communications Displays Safety concerns Meeting the standards Georgia s Regional Signal Operations Program

Lessons Learned Evolution of roles and responsibilities Firefighter, designer, constructor, integrator, maintainer, and operator Defining the needs and priorities Each agency is unique Each corridor has special requirements Improving the operations within constraints Coordination with other program/projects Local agency, other key stakeholders (CID), DOT (LARP, District, GO), Operational Improvements IT/Systems challenges Equipment purchases, network connection, system configuration, system interfaces Georgia s Regional Signal Operations Program

RTOP Funding Late start the first year funding cut Success in 2011 and 2012 lead to increased funding Program is now in expansion phase Anticipated Growth in 2016 to $23.5 Million $3M $8M $10M $12.75M $16.25M $16.25M $16.25M Georgia s Regional Signal Operations Program 29