Jordan Algebras and the Exceptional Lie algebra f 4

Similar documents
Cartan Involutions and Cartan Decompositions of a Semi-Simple Lie Algebra

Non-Isomorphic Real Simple Lie Algebras of the Same Complex Type and Character

Citation for published version (APA): Nutma, T. A. (2010). Kac-Moody Symmetries and Gauged Supergravity Groningen: s.n.

LECTURE 8: DETERMINANTS AND PERMUTATIONS

Multiple Input Multiple Output (MIMO) Operation Principles

THE SIGN OF A PERMUTATION

Lecture 3 Presentations and more Great Groups

17. Symmetries. Thus, the example above corresponds to the matrix: We shall now look at how permutations relate to trees.

1111: Linear Algebra I

Week 1. 1 What Is Combinatorics?

MATHEMATICS ON THE CHESSBOARD

MATH 433 Applied Algebra Lecture 12: Sign of a permutation (continued). Abstract groups.

NEGATIVE FOUR CORNER MAGIC SQUARES OF ORDER SIX WITH a BETWEEN 1 AND 5

Chapter 6.1. Cycles in Permutations

Classification of Spacetimes with Symmetry

To Your Hearts Content

Math 3560 HW Set 6. Kara. October 17, 2013

Analysis on the Properties of a Permutation Group

MAS336 Computational Problem Solving. Problem 3: Eight Queens

28,800 Extremely Magic 5 5 Squares Arthur Holshouser. Harold Reiter.

Reflections on the N + k Queens Problem

Three of these grids share a property that the other three do not. Can you find such a property? + mod

Twenty-fourth Annual UNC Math Contest Final Round Solutions Jan 2016 [(3!)!] 4

A NEW COMPUTATION OF THE CODIMENSION SEQUENCE OF THE GRASSMANN ALGEBRA

Permutation Generation Method on Evaluating Determinant of Matrices

SIGNAL MODEL AND PARAMETER ESTIMATION FOR COLOCATED MIMO RADAR

The Daubechies wavelet transform. 3 The computational cost of the wavelet transform

Construction Character Table of the Symmetric Group S 4 by Using Permutation Module

Realizing Strategies for winning games. Senior Project Presented by Tiffany Johnson Math 498 Fall 1999

Commuting Graphs on Dihedral Group

If a word starts with a vowel, add yay on to the end of the word, e.g. engineering becomes engineeringyay

INFLUENCE OF ENTRIES IN CRITICAL SETS OF ROOM SQUARES

Math 10C Chapter 3 Factors and Products Review Notes

BUILDING A SIMPLEX TABLEAU AND PROPER PIVOT SELECTION

Math 259 Winter Recitation Handout 6: Limits in Two Dimensions

37 Game Theory. Bebe b1 b2 b3. a Abe a a A Two-Person Zero-Sum Game

LIST OF PUBLICATIONS. Benedict H. Gross

MULTI-VARIABLE OPTIMIZATION NOTES. 1. Identifying Critical Points

Modular arithmetic Math 2320

Contents Systems of Linear Equations and Determinants

GLOSSARY. a * (b * c) = (a * b) * c. A property of operations. An operation * is called associative if:

ECE411 - Laboratory Exercise #1

Aesthetically Pleasing Azulejo Patterns

Digital Image Processing. Lecture # 6 Corner Detection & Color Processing

Lecture 2.3: Symmetric and alternating groups

Introduction to Wavelet Transform. Chapter 7 Instructor: Hossein Pourghassem

Chapter 8. Lesson a. (2x+3)(x+2) b. (2x+1)(3x+2) c. no solution d. (2x+y)(y+3) ; Conclusion. Not every expression can be factored.

CARD GAMES AND CRYSTALS

COMBINATORICS ON BIGRASSMANNIAN PERMUTATIONS AND ESSENTIAL SETS

Thank you! Estimation + Information Theory. ELEC 3004: Systems 1 June

Chapter 1. The alternating groups. 1.1 Introduction. 1.2 Permutations

A CLASSIFICATION OF QUADRATIC ROOK POLYNOMIALS

An improved strategy for solving Sudoku by sparse optimization methods

Math 32, October 22 & 27: Maxima & Minima

1.6 Congruence Modulo m

The Classification of Quadratic Rook Polynomials of a Generalized Three Dimensional Board

Cardinality. Hebrew alphabet). We write S = ℵ 0 and say that S has cardinality aleph null.

Embedded Orthogonal Space-Time Codes for High Rate and Low Decoding Complexity

A Novel Adaptive Method For The Blind Channel Estimation And Equalization Via Sub Space Method

Working with Formulas and Functions

Minimal generating sets of Weierstrass semigroups of certain m-tuples on the norm-trace function field

THE REMOTENESS OF THE PERMUTATION CODE OF THE GROUP U 6n. Communicated by S. Alikhani

The two generator restricted Burnside group of exponent five

FREDRIK TUFVESSON ELECTRICAL AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

Minimum Zero-Centre-Pandiagonal Composite Type II (a) Magic Squares over Multi Set of Integer Numbers as a Semiring

CHARACTERIZATION OF RINGS USING QUASIPROJECTIVE MODULES. II

Game Theory. Chapter 2 Solution Methods for Matrix Games. Instructor: Chih-Wen Chang. Chih-Wen NCKU. Game Theory, Ch2 1

MULTIPATH fading could severely degrade the performance

A FAMILY OF t-regular SELF-COMPLEMENTARY k-hypergraphs. Communicated by Behruz Tayfeh Rezaie. 1. Introduction

X = {1, 2,...,n} n 1f 2f 3f... nf

ELEMENTS OF NUMBER THEORY & CONGRUENCES. Lagrange, Legendre and Gauss. Mth Mathematicst

Efficient Target Detection from Hyperspectral Images Based On Removal of Signal Independent and Signal Dependent Noise

Periodic Complementary Sets of Binary Sequences

Basic Signals and Systems

Permutation Groups. Definition and Notation

Two Great Escapes. Jerry Lo, Grade 8 student, Affiliated High School of the Taiwan National Normal University. The Great Amoeba Escape

CSE548, AMS542: Analysis of Algorithms, Fall 2016 Date: Sep 25. Homework #1. ( Due: Oct 10 ) Figure 1: The laser game.

MULTIPLE-MODEL DEAD-BEAT CONTROLLER IN CASE OF CONTROL SIGNAL CONSTRAINTS

On the isomorphism problem of Coxeter groups and related topics

Digital Video and Audio Processing. Winter term 2002/ 2003 Computer-based exercises

Chapter 2: Signal Representation

You ve seen them played in coffee shops, on planes, and

Evacuation and a Geometric Construction for Fibonacci Tableaux

Magic Squares. Lia Malato Leite Victoria Jacquemin Noemie Boillot

ORTHOGONAL space time block codes (OSTBC) from

Latin Squares for Elementary and Middle Grades

A Signal Space Theory of Interferences Cancellation Systems

International Journal of Digital Application & Contemporary research Website: (Volume 1, Issue 7, February 2013)

#A3 INTEGERS 17 (2017) A NEW CONSTRAINT ON PERFECT CUBOIDS. Thomas A. Plick

STRATEGY AND COMPLEXITY OF THE GAME OF SQUARES

Computer Science Engineering Course Code : 311

RLC Frequency Response

132-avoiding Two-stack Sortable Permutations, Fibonacci Numbers, and Pell Numbers

Square & Square Roots

Determinants, Part 1

Acentral problem in the design of wireless networks is how

Corners in Tree Like Tableaux

Expansion/Analysis of a Card Trick Comprised of Transformations in 2-Dimensional Matrices Aaron Kazam Sherbany, Clarkstown North High School, NY

Title: Quadrilaterals Aren t Just Squares

The Fano Plane as an Octonionic Multiplication Table

Transcription:

Tutorial Series Table of Contents Related Pages digitalcommons.usu. edu/dg Jordan Algebras and the Exceptional Lie algebra f Synopsis. The Compact Form of f References Release Notes Cartan Subalgebras. The Split form of f Author. f 6 6 References Synopsis Jordan algebras are a general class of commutative (but usually non-associative) algebras which satisfy a certain weak associativity identity. A Jordan algebra is called special if there is an underlying associative algebra A and the Jordan product is x + y = / xy C yx. Jordan algebras which are not special are called exceptional. Let O denote the octonions let O' denote the split octonions let pq be the diagonal matrix with its first p entries equal to + and its remaining q entries equal to -. Let M n A denote the algebra of n # n matrices over an algebra (possibly non-associative) A. Define the Jordan algebras J O = A M O A = A J O' = A M O' A = A J O = A M O A = A.

We view these as real algebras. Since the octonions are non-associative these Jordan algebras are exceptional. All are easily created in Maple. The derivations of an algebra A over a field k are the kklinear maps f : A / A such that f x $ y = f x $y C x$f y. The set of all derivations forms a Lie algebra. n 95 Chevalley and Schafer [] proved that the derivation algebra of J O is the compact real form of the exceptional Lie algebra f. n Section of this tutorial we shall verify this result of Chevalley and Schafer. n Section we show that the derivation algebra of J O' is the split real form of f. We shall calculate the Chevalley basis for the split form of f. n Section we show that the derivation algebra of J O' gives the sole non-compact non-split real form of f. We shall produce the Satake diagram for this form.. The Compact Form of f as the Derivation Algebra of the Jordan Algebra J O with(differentialgeometry): with(liealgebras): We use the AlgebraLibraryData command to obtain the multiplication rules for the exceptional Jordan algebra J O. We shall refer to this 7-dimensional algebra as J. AD := AlgebraLibraryData("Jordan(Octonions)" JO): We use the DGsetup command to initialize this algebra. DGsetup(AD); algebra name: JO (.) The algebra of derivations of J O is a matrix algebra of 7 # 7 matrices. A basis of matrices for the derivations is computed here. Because of the size of this Lie algebra some of the the following calculations may take a minute or so to execute. JO autj := Derivations(JO): The derivation algebra is 5-dimensional.

JO nops(autj); 5 (.) We use the command LieAlgebraData to find the structure equations for the Lie algebra of derivations and initialize it. The keyword argument check = "no" means that the code will not check that the matrices are actually closed with respect to the matrix commutator. JO JO LD := LieAlgebraData(autJ f check = "no"): DGsetup(LD); Lie algebra: f (.) Now we show that this 5-dimensional Lie algebra is the compact real form for f. First we find the Killing form and calculate its signature. f B := KillingForm(f): Next we use QuadraticFormSignature to find a list of subspaces on which the Killing form is positive-definite negative definite and null. f S d f S := Tensor:-QuadraticFormSignature(B); e e e e e5 e6 e7 e8 e9 e e e e e e5 e6 e7 e8 e9 e e e e e e5 e5 K e5 e5 K e5 C e5 e5 C e C e5 C e5 e6 e6 K e5 e6 C e C e5 e6 C e K e C e5 e7 e7 K e5 e7 K e9 C e5 e7 C e C e9 C e5 e8 e8 C e8 e8 C e K e8 e8 C e5 K e K e8 e9 e9 C e9 e9 K e K e9 e9 C e6 C e K e9 e e K e6 e K e C e6 e C e7 C e C e6 e e K e7 e C e C e7 e C e8 K e C e7 map(nops S); 5 (.) (.5) This shows that the Killing form is negative-definite and therefore our Lie algebra is the compact form of a semi-simple Lie algebra. We now classify this algebra using the structure theory of semi-simple Lie algebras. This involves three steps. First find a Cartan subalgebra. Second find the corresponding root space decomposition. Third identify the simple roots and calculate the Cartan matrix.

Step. We find a Cartan subalgebra. t has dimension so that the derivation algebra f has rank. f CSA := CartanSubalgebra(); CSA d e e e K e e7 C e6 (.6) Since we know that the algebra is semi-simple we know that all Cartan subalgebras are abelian. Hence an alternative way to calculate a Cartan subalgebra (and one that is usually computationally faster) is to calculate a maximal abelian subalgebra MAS. f MAS := MaximalAbelianSubalgebra([e]); MAS d e e e K e e7 C e6 (.7) The generalized null space of this MAS is the MAS itself. This proves that our MAS is self-normalizing and therefore a Cartan subalgebra. f GeneralizedNullSpace(MAS); e e e K e e7 C e6 (.8) Step. We see that all the roots in the root space decomposition are pure imaginary numbers. This is consistent with the fact that the Lie algebra is of compact type. f f RSD := RootSpaceDecomposition(CSA): PosRts := PositiveRoots(RSD); PosRts d K K K K K K K K K K (.9)

K K K K K K K K Step. Finally we find the simple roots and the Cartan matrix to conclude that the derivation algebra of the octonions is the compact real form of f. f SimRts := SimpleRoots(PosRts); SimRts d K K K K K (.) f CM := CartanMatrix(SimRts RSD); K K CM d K K K (.) K To classify the Lie algebra from its Cartan matrix we transform it to standard form. f CartanMatrixToStandardForm(CM); (.)

K K K K K "F" (.) K. The Split Real Form of f as the Derivation Algebra of the Jordan Algebra J O ' We repeat the calculations of the previous section using the split octonions in place of the octonions. We use the AlgebraLibraryData command to obtain the multiplication rules for the exceptional Jordan algebra J O'. We shall refer to this 7-dimensional algebra as JS. This section may be executed independently of Section. with(differentialgeometry): with(liealgebras): AD := AlgebraLibraryData("Jordan( Octonions)" JOS type = "Split"): We use the DGsetup command to initialize this algebra. DGsetup(AD); algebra name: JOS (.) The algebra of derivations is a matrix algebra of 7 # 7 matrices. We do not display the matrices. JOS autjos:= Derivations(JOS): The derivation algebra is 5-dimensional. JOS nops(autjos); 5 (.)

We find the structure equations for the Lie algebra and initialize. The keyword argument check = "no" means that the code will not check that the matrices are actually closed with respect to the matrix commutator. JOS JOS LD := LieAlgebraData(autJOS f check = "no"): DGsetup(LD); Lie algebra: f (.) Now we show that this 5-dimensional Lie algebra is the split real form for f. We calculate the Killing form and find its signature to be [8 ]. This shows that our algebra f is semi-simple. f f f B := KillingForm(f): S := Tensor:-QuadraticFormSignature(B): map(nops S); 8 (.) The steps to finding the Chevalley basis for f are: [] Find any Cartan subalgebra. [] Find the root space decomposition. f the roots are real then skip to step 5. Otherwise steps [] and [] construct maximally non-compact Cartan subalgebra. [] Find a Cartan decomposition. [] Find a maximal abelian sub-algebra in the positive part of the Cartan decomposition. At this point we now have a Cartan subalgebra giving a real root space decomposition [5] Recalculate the root space decomposition [6] Calculate the Chevalley basis. Step. Find a Cartan subalgebra for f. f CSA := CartanSubalgebra(); CSA d e e e K e e7 K e6 (.5) Step. Find the root space decomposition. We see that the roots are not real and therefore this choice of Cartan subalgebra will not lead to a real change of basis for the Chevalley basis. f f RSD := RootSpaceDecomposition(CSA): PosRts := PositiveRoots(RSD);

PosRts d K K K K K K K K K (.6) K K K K K K K K K Step. Find the Cartan decomposition. f T P := CartanDecomposition(CSA RSD PosRts); T P d e e C e5 e e K 5 e6 e5 e K e6 e K e e C e e7 C e e8 K e e9 (.7) K e e C e e5 e6 K 5 e8 C 5 e8 C e5 e7 e e e e5 C e8 C e5 e6 K e9 K e5 e8 C e7 C e5 e9 K 5 e C 5 e9 C e5 e e5 C 5 e7 C e5 e C e5 e K 5 e6 e7 e8 e9 e K e6 e K e e C e e7 C e e8 K e e9 K e e C e e6 K 5 e8 C 5 e8 C e5 e9 e e C e e K e K e7 K e5 e K e8 K e5 e K e9 K e5 e5 e6 e7 e8 K e e9 K 5 e C 5 e9 C e5 e e e5 C 5 e7 C e5 e6 Step. Find a maximal abelian ideal inside of the positive part P of the Cartan decomposition. This is the required maximally non-compact Cartan subalgebra.

f CSA := MaximalAbelianSubalgebra([e + *e5] P); CSA d e C e5 e6 K 5 e8 C 5 e8 C e5 e K e6 e (.8) All steps []--[] can be executed using the keyword argument maximallynoncompact = "yes". f CartanSubalgebra(maximallynoncompact = "yes"); e C e5 e6 K 5 e8 C 5 e8 C e5 e K e6 e (.9) Step 5. Find the root space decomposition for CSA. Now the roots are all real. f f RSD := RootSpaceDecomposition(CSA): PosRts := PositiveRoots(RSD); PosRts d K K K K K K 8 K K (.) K K K K K K K K K K K K Step 6. Find the Chevalley basis. f CB := ChevalleyBasis(RSD PosRts): Finally let's examine the structure equations in this basis.

f LD := LieAlgebraData(CB fcb): n the Chevalley basis the Cartan subalgebra is given by the first vectors the next vectors are bases for the positive root spaces and the last vectors are bases for the negative root spaces. JOS VectorLabels := [h h h h seq(x i i =.. ) seq(y i i =.. )] ; VectorLabels d h h h h x x x x x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x x x x x x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x x x x x y y y y y5 y6 y7 y8 y9 y y y y y y5 y6 y7 y8 y9 y y y y y f DGsetup(LD VectorLabels ['o']); Lie algebra: fcb (.) (.) The entire multiplication table is too large to display so we consider just a block in the upper left-hand corner. fcb MultiplicationTable(fcb "LieTable" rows = [ ] columns = [ 5 6 7 8 9 ]); fcb h h h h x x x x x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x h x K x K x5 x7 x8 K x9 K x h K x x K x x5 K x6 x7 x9 h K x x K x x6 K x7 K x9 x h K x x K x5 x6 K x8 x9 K x (.) We see that h h h h give the Cartan subalgebra (they are abelian and act by scaling on the remaining root spaces). We see that the coefficients in the multiplication table are all integers between - and. The Cartan matrix appears as the coefficients in the structure equations for hi xj.. The Remaining Real Form of f f 6 6 ) as the Derivation Algebra of the Jordan Algebra J O We repeat the calculations of the previous two sections using the exceptional Jordan algebra J O. This algebra is not stored in DifferentialGeometry and so must be constructed by hand.

This section may be executed independently of Sections and. with(differentialgeometry): with(liealgebras): The first step in creating the exceptional Jordan algebra is to create the octonions. AD := AlgebraLibraryData("Octonions" H); AD d e e = e e e = e e e = e e e = e e e5 = e5 e e6 = e6 e e7 = e7 e e8 = e8 e e = e e e = K e e e = e e e = K e e e5 = e6 e e6 = K e5 e e7 = K e8 e e8 = e7 e e = e e e = K e e e = K e e e = e e e5 = e7 e e6 = e8 e e7 = K e5 e e8 = K e6 e e = e e e = e e e = K e e e = K e e e5 = e8 e e6 = K e7 e e7 = e6 e e8 = K e5 e5 e = e5 e5 e = K e6 e5 e = K e7 e5 e = K e8 e5 e5 = K e e5 e6 = e e5 e7 = e e5 e8 = e e6 e = e6 e6 e = e5 e6 e = K e8 e6 e = e7 e6 e5 = K e e6 e6 = K e e6 e7 = K e e6 e8 = e e7 e = e7 e7 e = e8 e7 e = e5 e7 e = K e6 e7 e5 = K e e7 e6 = e e7 e7 = K e e7 e8 = K e e8 e = e8 e8 e = K e7 e8 e = e6 e8 e = e5 e8 e5 = K e e8 e6 = K e e8 e7 = e e8 e8 = K e DGsetup(AD [x] [o]); algebra name: H (.) (.) Note that we are using x to denote algebra elements with o denoting elements of the dual. Here are the Jordan matrices over the octonions which are Hermitian with respect to the standard -dimensional Minkowski inner product. H JM := JordanMatrices( H signature = [ ]); x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x JM := x x x x x x x x x K x x x K x x x (.) x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x5 x x x6 x x x7 x x x8 x K x x x K x5 x x K x6 x x K x7 x x K x8 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x

x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x5 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x K x x x x x x x x x x x x x5 x x x x x6 x x x7 x x x8 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x6 x x x7 x x x8 x x x K x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x5 x x x6 x x x7 x x x8 x x x x x x x x5 x x x6 x x x7 x x x8 x x x x x x x x x x Calculate the structure constants for these matrices. AD := AlgebraData(JM JordanProduct JO): We use the DGsetup command to initialize this algebra. DGsetup(AD); algebra name: JO (.) The algebra of derivations is a matrix algebra of 7 # 7 matrices. We do not display the matrices. JO autjo:= Derivations(JO): The derivation algebra is 5-dimensional. JO nops(autjo); 5 (.5)

We find the structure equations for the Lie algebra of derivations and initialize it. The keyword argument check = "no" means that the code will not check that the matrices are actually closed with respect to the matrix commutator. JO JO LD := LieAlgebraData(autJO f check = "no"): DGsetup(LD); Lie algebra: f (.6) Now we show that this 5-dimensional Lie algebra is the non-compact non-split real form for f. We calculate the Killing form and find its signature to be [6 6]. f f f B := KillingForm(f): S := Tensor:-QuadraticFormSignature(B): map(nops S); 6 6 (.7) The steps to finding the Satake diagram for f are: [] Find a maximally non-compact Cartan subalgebra. [] Calculate the root space decomposition. [] Examine the simple roots and determine which ones are Satake associates. Step. Find a maximally compact Cartan subalgebra for f. f CSA := CartanSubalgebra(maximallynoncompact = "yes"); CSA := e9 e5 C e7 C e5 e9 K e e8 C e5 (.8) Step. Find the root space decomposition and the simple roots. f f f RSD := RootSpaceDecomposition(CSA): PosRts := PositiveRoots(RSD): SimRts := SimpleRoots(PosRts); (.9)

SimRts := K K K K K (.9) f CM := CartanMatrix(SimRts RSD); K K CM := K K K K (.) f CM := CartanMatrixToStandardForm(CM SimRts); K CM := K K K K "F" (.) K Step. The first roots are purely imaginary roots and these are therefore colored. in the Satake diagram. The th root is white and is its own Satake associate. This gives the correct Satake diagram for f 6 6 or f K. References. John Baez The octonions Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 9() 5-5. C. Chevalley and R. D. Schafer The exceptional simple Lie algebras F and E6 Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S. 6 7 (95). W. Fulton and J. Harris Representation Theory Graduate Texts in Mathematics 9 Springer 99.. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/octonion http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/split-octonion 5. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/f_(mathematics)

Release Notes This worksheet was compiled with Maple 7 and DG release USU available by request from ian.anderson@usu.edu Author an M. Anderson Department of Mathematics Utah State University December