Many-antenna base stations are interesting systems. Lin Zhong

Similar documents
Beamforming on mobile devices: A first study

Massive MIMO Full-duplex: Theory and Experiments

Argos: Practical Base Stations for Large-scale Beamforming. Clayton W. Shepard

Practical Performance of MU-MIMO Precoding in Many-Antenna Base Stations

5G: Opportunities and Challenges Kate C.-J. Lin Academia Sinica

Massive MIMO a overview. Chandrasekaran CEWiT

What is the Role of MIMO in Future Cellular Networks: Massive? Coordinated? mmwave?

NR Physical Layer Design: NR MIMO

5G India Demystifying 5G, Massive MIMO and Challenges

S. Mohammad Razavizadeh. Mobile Broadband Network Research Group (MBNRG) Iran University of Science and Technology (IUST)

ArgosNet: A Multi-Cell Many-Antenna MU-MIMO Platform

Prof. Xinyu Zhang. Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Wisconsin-Madison

Design of mmwave massive MIMO cellular systems

Beamforming for 4.9G/5G Networks

What s Behind 5G Wireless Communications?

5G: implementation challenges and solutions

Control Channel Design for Many-Antenna MU-MIMO

Wireless InSite. Simulation of MIMO Antennas for 5G Telecommunications. Copyright Remcom Inc. All rights reserved.

Next Generation Mobile Communication. Michael Liao

Power Consumption by Wireless Communication. Lin Zhong ELEC518, Spring 2011

System Performance of Cooperative Massive MIMO Downlink 5G Cellular Systems

Hybrid Transceivers for Massive MIMO - Some Recent Results

Massive MIMO and mmwave

Massive MIMO for the New Radio Overview and Performance

2015 The MathWorks, Inc. 1

802.11ax Design Challenges. Mani Krishnan Venkatachari

MIMO Systems and Applications

Prototyping Next-Generation Communication Systems with Software-Defined Radio

mm Wave Communications J Klutto Milleth CEWiT

MIMO and Beamforming in the 5G Context SBrT 2017

Lecture LTE (4G) -Technologies used in 4G and 5G. Spread Spectrum Communications

Interference Mitigation by MIMO Cooperation and Coordination - Theory and Implementation Challenges

On the Complementary Benefits of Massive MIMO, Small Cells, and TDD

Hang Yu A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIRMENTS FOR THE DEGREE. Master of Science

Analysis of massive MIMO networks using stochastic geometry

Analysis and Improvements of Linear Multi-user user MIMO Precoding Techniques

Ten Things You Should Know About MIMO

Massive MIMO: Ten Myths and One Critical Question. Dr. Emil Björnson. Department of Electrical Engineering Linköping University, Sweden

Hype, Myths, Fundamental Limits and New Directions in Wireless Systems

Analysis of Novel Eigen Beam Forming Scheme with Power Allocation in LSAS

MATLAB COMMUNICATION TITLES

Reconfigurable antennas for WiFi networks. Daniele Piazza Founder and CTO Adant Technologies Inc

Beyond 4G: Millimeter Wave Picocellular Wireless Networks

Designing Energy Efficient 5G Networks: When Massive Meets Small

Experimental evaluation of massive MIMO at 20 GHz band in indoor environment

Bringing the Magic of Asymptotic Analysis to Wireless Networks

5G - The multi antenna advantage. Bo Göransson, PhD Expert, Multi antenna systems Systems & Technology

Understanding Real Many-Antenna. MU-MIMO channels.

5G Massive MIMO and mmw Design and Test Solution

Millimeter Wave Communication in 5G Wireless Networks. By: Niloofar Bahadori Advisors: Dr. J.C. Kelly, Dr. B Kelley

Interference management Within 3GPP LTE advanced

ON PILOT CONTAMINATION IN MASSIVE MULTIPLE-INPUT MULTIPLE- OUTPUT SYSTEM WITH LEAST SQUARE METHOD AND ZERO FORCING RECEIVER

MIMO: State of the Art, and the Future in Focus Mboli Sechang Julius

A Method for Analyzing Broadcast Beamforming of Massive MIMO Antenna Array

Tuning the Receiver Structure and the Pilot-to-Data Power Ratio in Multiple Input Multiple Output Systems

Millimeter-Wave Communication and Mobile Relaying in 5G Cellular Networks

What s Behind 5G Wireless Communications?

mm-wave Transceiver Challenges for the 5G and 60GHz Standards Prof. Emanuel Cohen Technion

Massive MIMO: Signal Structure, Efficient Processing, and Open Problems I

LTE Direct Overview. Sajith Balraj Qualcomm Research

MIMO in 4G Wireless. Presenter: Iqbal Singh Josan, P.E., PMP Director & Consulting Engineer USPurtek LLC

Multiple Antenna Processing for WiMAX

LTE Base Station Equipments Usable with W-CDMA System

Wideband Channel Tracking for mmwave MIMO System with Hybrid Beamforming Architecture

LTE-Advanced research in 3GPP

Fractional Delay Filter Based Wideband Self- Interference Cancellation

Compressed-Sensing Based Multi-User Millimeter Wave Systems: How Many Measurements Are Needed?

HOW DO MIMO RADIOS WORK? Adaptability of Modern and LTE Technology. By Fanny Mlinarsky 1/12/2014

Massive MIMO Systems: Signal Processing Challenges and Research Trends

MU-MIMO in LTE/LTE-A Performance Analysis. Rizwan GHAFFAR, Biljana BADIC

From massive MIMO to C-RAN: the OpenAirInterface 5G testbed

Investigation on Multiple Antenna Transmission Techniques in Evolved UTRA. OFDM-Based Radio Access in Downlink. Features of Evolved UTRA and UTRAN

Adaptive Beamforming towards 5G systems. Whitepaper 1

Challenges of 5G mmwave RF Module. Ren-Jr Chen M300/ICL/ITRI 2018/06/20

A key parameters based vision

AEROHIVE NETWORKS ax DAVID SIMON, SENIOR SYSTEMS ENGINEER Aerohive Networks. All Rights Reserved.

Frequency Reuse How Do I Maximize the Value of My Spectrum?

5G New Radio Design. Fall VTC-2017, Panel September 25 th, Expanding the human possibilities of technology to make our lives better

Uplink Receiver with V-BLAST and Practical Considerations for Massive MIMO System

MIDU: Enabling MIMO Full Duplex

Performance Analysis of CoMP Using Scheduling and Precoding Techniques in the Heterogeneous Network

Transforming MIMO Test

NI Technical Symposium ni.com

Energy Efficient Multiple Access Scheme for Multi-User System with Improved Gain

Handset MIMO antenna measurement using a Spatial Fading Emulator

Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access (NOMA) in 5G Cellular Downlink and Uplink: Achievements and Challenges

Page 1. Overview : Wireless Networks Lecture 9: OFDM, WiMAX, LTE

Addressing Future Wireless Demand

A Practical Channel Estimation Scheme for Indoor 60GHz Massive MIMO System. Arumugam Nallanathan King s College London

Performance Analysis of Massive MIMO Downlink System with Imperfect Channel State Information

Discussion Points for HW-CSP Breakout Session. July 19, 2017 Jeyanandh Paramesh, Subhanshu Gupta, Greg LaCaille, Vishal Saxena, Sarah Yost

Antennas Multiple antenna systems

Design, Simulation & Concept Verification of 4 4, 8 8 MIMO With ZF, MMSE and BF Detection Schemes

NetPoint Pro. 6x2.4, 6x5.8, 3x2.4, 3x5.8. Wi-Fi base Stations Providing Superior Connectivity

Efficient and Low Complex Uplink Detection for 5G Massive MIMO Systems

flexicon.ee.columbia.edu Harish Krishnaswamy, Gil Zussman, Jin Zhou, Jelena (Marašević) Diakonikolas, Tolga Dinc, Negar Reiskarimian, Tingjun Chen

Beamforming algorithm for physical layer security of multi user large scale antenna network

Energy Harvested and Achievable Rate of Massive MIMO under Channel Reciprocity Error

All Beamforming Solutions Are Not Equal

Full Duplex Radios. Sachin Katti Kumu Networks & Stanford University 4/17/2014 1

Transcription:

Many-antenna base stations are interesting systems Lin Zhong http://recg.org

2

How we got started Why many-antenna base station What we have learned What we are doing now 3

How we started Why a mobile system guy got interested in massive MIMO 4

Wireless consumes a lot of power 1800 1600 1615 1400 Power (mw) 1200 1000 800 600 HTC Wizard October 2005 704 900 725 400 200 0 5 3 221 142 88 92 80 93 142 2 180 315 9 90 32 97 25 Power profile!=energy profile 5

First insight Wi-Fi more efficient than cellular MobiSys 07 6

Why is Wi-Fi more efficient? P TX = a*d 2 D 7

Horribly wasteful 8

Directional transmission! 9

Passive directional antenna to save energy (MobiCom 10) No power overhead Fixed bean patterns 10

Beamforming to save energy (MobiCom 11) Extra transceivers Steerable beams 11

Power by multi-antenna systems (uplink) P Circuit P PA =P TX / η Baseband Signal DAC Filter Mixer Filter PA 1 Frequency Synthesizer N P Shared Baseband Signal DAC Filter Mixer Filter PA N P = P shared + N P Circuit + P TX / η 12

Circuit vs. radiation power tradeoff P=P shared + 1 P Circuit + P TX / η Fixed receiver SNR

Circuit vs. radiation power tradeoff P=P shared + 2 P Circuit + P TX / η Fixed receiver SNR

Circuit vs. radiation power tradeoff P=P shared + 3 P Circuit + P TX / η Fixed receiver SNR

Circuit vs. radiation power tradeoff P=P shared + 4 P Circuit + P TX / η Fixed receiver SNR

Circuit vs. radiation power tradeoff Optimal number of antennas for efficiency N = a P /P b P

Hardware is cheap & getting cheaper P = P shared + N P Circuit + P TX / η Transmitter Power Consumption (mw) 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 SISO 2x2 MIMO 0 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 Year Sources: IEEE Int. Solid-State Circuits Conferences (ISSCC) and IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits (JSSC)

Hardware is cheap & getting cheaper P = P shared + N P Circuit + P TX / η Sources: IEEE Int. Solid-State Circuits Conferences (ISSCC) and IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits (JSSC)

Circuit vs. radiation power tradeoff is increasingly profitable N = a P /P b P The most energy-efficient way is to use all the antennas 20

Beyond a single link 21

What the carrier wants: Use all your antennas! 22

Guiding principles distilled Spectrum is scarce Hardware is cheap, and getting cheaper 23

You can t really fit a lot of antennas in a mobile device L 24

Got a call from Erran Li, Bell Labs Spring 2011 25

3590 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, VOL. 9, NO. 11, NOVEMBER 2010 Noncooperative Cellular Wireless with Unlimited Numbers of Base Station Antennas Thomas L. Marzetta 26

Clay Shepard went to Bell Labs Summer 2011 27

Why many-antenna base station? 28

Omni-directional base station Data 1 Poor spatial reuse; poor power efficiency; high inter-cell interference 29

Sectored base station Data 1 Better spatial reuse; better power efficiency; high inter-cell interference 30

Single-user beamforming base station Data 1 Data 3 Better spatial reuse; best power efficiency; reduced inter-cell interference 31

Multi-user MIMO base station Data 2 Data 1 Data 5 M: # of BS antennas K: # of clients (K M) Best spatial reuse; best power efficiency; reduced inter-cell interference 32

Why massive? More antennas è Higher spectral efficiency More antennas è Higher energy efficiency Marzetta s key result Simple baseband technique becomes effective T.L. Marzetta. Noncooperative cellular wireless with unlimited numbers of base station antennas. IEEE Trans. on Wireless Comm., 2010. 33

How multi-user MIMO works H M: # of BS antennas K: # of clients M K 34

Multi-user MIMO: Precoding s s! = f (s, H) (Kx1 matrix) (M x 1 matrix) H M: # of BS antennas K: # of clients M K 35

Linear Precoding s (Kx1 matrix) s! = W s (M x 1 matrix) H M: # of BS antennas K: # of clients M K 36

Linear Precoding I: Zero-forcing Beamforming Null Data 1 Null Null 37

Zero-forcing Beamforming Data 2 Null Null 38

Zero-forcing Beamforming W = c H * (H T H * ) 1 Data 2 Data 1 Data 5 39

Zero-forcing does not scale well W = c H * (H T H * ) 1 Inversion of M X M matrix O(M*K 2 ) 40

Linear precoding II: Conjugate Beamforming Data 1 41

With more antennas Data 1 42

With even more antennas Data 1 43

Conjugate Multi-user Beamforming W = c H * Data 2 Data 1 Data 5 Conjugate approaches Zeroforcing as M/Kè

Conjugate scales very well W = c H * O(K) per antenna Marzetta s key result: Conjugate approaches Zeroforcing as M/Kè 45

Many-antenna vs. small cell Capital Expenditure (CAPEX) of Cell Site Major wireless equipment only 35% Just get the site to work: >50% China Mobile White Paper: C-RAN: The Road Towards Green RAN (Oct, 2011) 46

Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) Operating & Maintenance (O&M) Operating Expenditure (OPEX) The most effective way to reduce TCO is to decrease the number of sites. China Mobile White Paper: C-RAN: The Road Towards Green RAN (Oct, 2011) 47

If you ve got a site, better use as many antennas as you can 48

After a summer at Bell Labs 10-antenna prototype in the anechoic chamber at Bell Labs 49

ArgosV1 (MobiCom 12) 50

Central Controller WARP Modules Argos Interconnects Sync Distribution Argos Hub Clock Distribution Ethernet Switch51

What we have learned 52

Good news: Linear gains as # of users increases Capacity vs. K, with M = 64 53

Linear gains as # of BS antennas increases even as total P TX scaled with 1/M Capacity vs. M, with K = 15 54

Disappointment: Conjugate not approaching Zero-forcing up to 64 antennas Capacity vs. M, with K = 15 55

Disappointment: Conjugate not approaching Zero-forcing up to 64 antennas Capacity vs. M, with K = 4 Total Capacity (bps/hz) 30 25 20 15 10 Zero forcing Conjugate Local Conj. SUBF Single Ant. 5 0 20 30 40 50 60 Base Station Antennas 56

The dirty secret of massive MIMO s s! = f (s, H) (Kx1 matrix) (M x 1 matrix) H M: # of BS antennas K: # of clients M K 57

The dirty secret of massive MIMO s s! = f (s, H) (Kx1 matrix) (M x 1 matrix) H M: # of BS antennas K: # of clients M K 58

Sounding-feedback does not scale s s! = f (s, H) (Kx1 matrix) (M x 1 matrix) M: # of BS antennas K: # of clients M K 59

One must use time-division duplex and client-sent pilot s s! = f (s, H) (Kx1 matrix) (M x 1 matrix) M: # of BS antennas K: # of clients M K 60

What happens in a single coherence period Listen to pilot Send data Calculate BF weights Receive data Time Send pilot Receive data Send data Time Within coherence time 61

Both theory and our experiments only consider Listen to pilot Send data Calculate BF weights Receive data Time Send pilot Receive data Send data Time 62

What if we factor all in? Listen to pilot Send data Calculate BF weights Receive data Time Send pilot Receive data Send data Time The base station can receive during calculation but the opportunity is limited due to downlink/uplink asymmetry 63

What if we factor all in? Listen to pilot Send data Calculate BF weights Receive data Time Client mobility Channel coherence time Number of clients Time to listen to pilot Computation hardware on base station Time to calculate BF weights 64

M = 64 K = 15 Type S L Inv. Type Sym. Super Infiniband 40 Gbps 1 µs FPGA Cluster 4x10GbE 40 Gbps 20 µs 8xIntel i7 High 2x10GbE 20 Gbps 20 µs 4xIntel i7 Mid 10GbE 10 Gbps 20 µs 2xIntel i7 F Low GbE 1Gbps 20 µs Intel i7 N Zeroforcing with various hardware configurations 65

Achieved Capacity (bps/hz) 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 O(K) O(MK 2 ) Zero Forcing Conjugate 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Number of Users Fixed coherence time of 30 ms with low-end hardware. 66

What we have learned Computational resources matter significantly Simplistic Conjugate beamforming works Not in Marzetta s theoretical sense Need adaptive solutions # of clients; client mobility Precoding methods: Conjugate vs. Zero-forcing 67

What we are working on 68

Going for more antennas ArgosV2 (2013) 12 WARP V3 (48 antennas) per rack Polycarbonate, dado-style shelf Anti-static spray and thermal vent Battery-powered ArgosMobile 69

96-antenna configuration

Ongoing Work: ArgosLab Software Framework for Rapid Prototyping Out-of-the-box Functionality Time/Frequency Synchronization Calibration CSI Collection Scheduled frame-based real-time Transmission

From Argos to ArgosNet 10 GbE ArgosBS 1 (Outdoor) Inter-cell interference management Pilot contamination Client grouping & scheduling Cloud RAN 10 Server GbE NetFPGA 10 GbE ArgosBS 4 (Indoor) NetFPGA Server 10 GbE NetFPGA Server 10 GbE ArgosCloud 10 GbE 10 GbE ArgosBS 2 (Outdoor) ArgosBS 3 (Outdoor) A network of massive MU-MIMO base stations 74

In summary 75

More BS antennas + MU-MIMOè Higher efficiency & lower interference Data 2 Data 1 Data 5

More BS antennas + MU-MIMOè Higher efficiency & lower interference Data 3 Data 1 Data 6 Data 12 Data 9 Data 10

Guiding Principles Spectrum is scarce Hardware is cheap, and getting cheaper 78

Acknowledgments http://argos.rice.edu 79