Another Compensator Design Example

Similar documents
R. W. Erickson. Department of Electrical, Computer, and Energy Engineering University of Colorado, Boulder

Lecture 48 Review of Feedback HW # 4 Erickson Problems Ch. 9 # s 7 &9 and questions in lectures I. Review of Negative Feedback

Lecture 8 ECEN 4517/5517

Introduction to Modeling of Switched Mode Power Converters Using MATLAB and Simulink

Analog Electronics. Lecture Pearson Education. Upper Saddle River, NJ, All rights reserved.

ITT Technical Institute ET245 Devices II Unit 5 Chapter

DSP based Digital Control Design for DC-DC Switch Mode Power Converter. Shamim Choudhury Texas Instruments Inc.

R. W. Erickson. Department of Electrical, Computer, and Energy Engineering University of Colorado, Boulder

Final Exam. Anyone caught copying or allowing someone to copy from them will be ejected from the exam.

Introduction to Analog Interfacing. ECE/CS 5780/6780: Embedded System Design. Various Op Amps. Ideal Op Amps

Today: DCDC additional topics

ECE317 Homework 7. where

BUCK Converter Control Cookbook

ELC224 Final Review (12/10/2009) Name:

Homework Assignment 13

Practical Control Design for Power Supplies. Power Seminar 2004/2005

ME451: Control Systems. Course roadmap

Homework Assignment 13

Homework Assignment 04

ANNA UNIVERSITY :: CHENNAI MODEL QUESTION PAPER(V-SEMESTER) B.E. ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING EC334 - CONTROL SYSTEMS

Loop Compensation of Voltage-Mode Buck Converters

Stability Analysis of Bus Architecture

Methodology for testing a regulator in a DC/DC Buck Converter using Bode 100 and SpCard

Fixed Frequency Control vs Constant On-Time Control of Step-Down Converters

Course Outline. Time vs. Freq. Domain Analysis. Frequency Response. Amme 3500 : System Dynamics & Control. Design via Frequency Response

Voltage-Mode Buck Regulators

LINEAR MODELING OF A SELF-OSCILLATING PWM CONTROL LOOP

Lecture 4 ECEN 4517/5517

Design Type III Compensation Network For Voltage Mode Step-down Converters

EE233 Autumn 2016 Electrical Engineering University of Washington. EE233 HW7 Solution. Nov. 16 th. Due Date: Nov. 23 rd

Chapter 6. Small signal analysis and control design of LLC converter

PWM-CM model in LTspice. Simulation Description

Designing low-frequency decoupling using SIMPLIS

Lecture 2 Analog circuits. Seeing the light..

ELECTRICAL CIRCUITS 6. OPERATIONAL AMPLIFIERS PART III DYNAMIC RESPONSE

Elements of Power Electronics PART III: Digital control

LECTURE 2: PD, PID, and Feedback Compensation. ( ) = + We consider various settings for Zc when compensating the system with the following RL:

ECE 363 FINAL (F16) 6 problems for 100 pts Problem #1: Fuel Pump Controller (18 pts)

CDS 101/110: Lecture 8.2 PID Control

Dr Ian R. Manchester

Chapter 10: The Operational Amplifiers

Magnetic Levitation System

Introduction to Switched-Mode Converter Modeling using MATLAB/Simulink

Physics 116A Notes Fall 2004

DC/DC Converter. Introduction

Current-mode PWM controller

Electrical Engineering. Control Systems. Comprehensive Theory with Solved Examples and Practice Questions. Publications

Homework Assignment 03

Switched-mode power supply control circuit

AN294. Si825X FREQUENCY COMPENSATION SIMULATOR FOR D IGITAL BUCK CONVERTERS

SG2525A SG3525A REGULATING PULSE WIDTH MODULATORS

Christophe Basso Technical Fellow IEEE Senior Member

Modelling and Simulation of Closed Loop. Controlled DC-DC Converter Fed Solenoid Coil

Background (What Do Line and Load Transients Tell Us about a Power Supply?)

ECE317 : Feedback and Control

Electronics EECE2412 Spring 2016 Exam #1

Homework Assignment 10

PURPOSE: NOTE: Be sure to record ALL results in your laboratory notebook.

Peak Current Mode Control Stability Analysis & Design. George Kaminski Senior System Application Engineer September 28, 2018

Preliminary. Synchronous Buck PWM DC-DC Controller FP6329/A. Features. Description. Applications. Ordering Information.

Control of Drivetrain Boost DC DC Converter

Lecture 2 Analog circuits. IR detection

Understanding Op Amp Dynamic Response In A Type-2 Compensator (Part 2): The Two Poles

CHAPTER 2 PWM AND PSM DC/DC BUCK CONVERTERS

LM348. Quad Operational Amplifier. Features. Description. Internal Block Diagram.

Operational Amplifier BME 360 Lecture Notes Ying Sun

SIMULATION OF A SERIES RESONANT CIRCUIT ECE562: Power Electronics I COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY. Modified in Fall 2011

Lecture 2 Analog circuits. Seeing the light..

Friday, 1/27/17 Constraints on A(jω)

Microelectronic Circuits - Fifth Edition Sedra/Smith Copyright 2004 by Oxford University Press, Inc.

January 2001 Power Management Products SLVU044

SIMULATIONS OF LCC RESONANT CIRCUIT POWER ELECTRONICS COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY. Modified in Spring 2006

Core Technology Group Application Note 2 AN-2

2.4 Modeling and Analysis of Three Phase Four Leg Inverter

Lecture 7:Examples using compensators

Design of Compensator for Dynamical System

Fundamentals of Power Electronics

ECE-342 Test 1: Sep 27, :00-8:00, Closed Book. Name : SOLUTION

(b) 25% (b) increases

Testing and Stabilizing Feedback Loops in Today s Power Supplies

Rotary Motion Servo Plant: SRV02. Rotary Experiment #03: Speed Control. SRV02 Speed Control using QuaRC. Student Manual

Motomatic via Bode by Frank Owen, PhD, PE Mechanical Engineering Department California Polytechnic State University San Luis Obispo

EM5301. Pin Assignment

Homework Assignment 06

Practical Testing Techniques For Modern Control Loops

Homework Assignment 06

Filter Design in Continuous Conduction Mode (CCM) of Operation; Part 2 Boost Regulator

Improvement of SBC Circuit using MPPT Controller

EXPERIMENT 1: Characteristics of Passive and Active Filters

EE 370/L Feedback and Control Systems Lab Section Post-Lab Report. EE 370L Feedback and Control Systems Lab

Homework Assignment 03 Solution

LF411 Low Offset, Low Drift JFET Input Operational Amplifier

Andrea Zanchettin Automatic Control 1 AUTOMATIC CONTROL. Andrea M. Zanchettin, PhD Spring Semester, Linear control systems design

THE K FACTOR: A NEW MATHEMATICAL TOOL FOR STABILITY ANALYSIS AND SYNTHESIS

A Novel on Design and Analysis of on Chip Low Drop out Regulator for Improving Transient Response

SAR (successive-approximation-register) ADCs

AN726. Vishay Siliconix AN726 Design High Frequency, Higher Power Converters With Si9166

APPLICATION NOTE 6071 CHOOSE THE RIGHT REGULATOR FOR THE RIGHT JOB: PART 3, COMPONENT SELECTION

Mini Project 3 Multi-Transistor Amplifiers. ELEC 301 University of British Columbia

Electronics basics for MEMS and Microsensors course

Transcription:

Another Compensator Design Example + V g i L (t) + L + _ f s = 1 MHz Dead-time control PWM 1/V M duty-cycle command Compensator G c c( (s) C error Point-of-Load Synchronous Buck Regulator + I out R _ + V V ref v o _ Power stage parameters Switching frequency: f s = 1MHz V ref = 1.8 V I out = to 5 A V g = 5 V L = 1 H R L = 3 m C = 2 F R esr =.8 m V M = 1 V H = 1

Buck Averaged Small-Signal Model V g d R L L i L R esr + G vd ( s) vˆ o dˆ 1 s v + R g D i + v L D v g esr Gvd ( s) Vg 2 I o d C 1 s s 1 Q o o Pair of poles: Low-frequency gain (including PWM gain): 1 f o 11kHz 2 CL 1 G vd 5 14dB o VM L / C R Qloss 2.3 7.2 db Q load 5 Resr RL L / C ESR zero: QlossQload Q Q 2.3 7.2 db 1 loss Qload Q fesr 1MHz loss Qload 2CR esr

Uncompensated loop gain T u i L (t) I out + L + + V g C R v o _ f s = 1 MHz Dead-time control PWM duty-cycle command G vd (s) Compensator error + H sense = 1 (in this example) 1/V M G c (s) = 1 + V ref T u (s) = H sense (1/V M )G vd (s) Plot magnitude and phase responses of T u (s) to plan how to design G c (s)

Magnitude and phase Bode plots of T u 8dB 6dB T u (s) = H sense (1/V M )G vd (s) 4dB 2dB T uo G vdo ( 1/ V ) H 5 14dB M sense Q 2.3 7.2dB db -2dB f o 11kHz 1 1/ 2Q f o 4dB/dec T uo f f o c 2 o target tff c 2dB/dec f esr 1MHz -9 o 1 1/ 2Q f o 1/1 f esr 1 Hz 1 Hz 1 KHz 1 KHz 1 KHz 1 MHz -18 o

Magnitude and phase Bode plots of T u [db] magnitude 5-5 -1 Uncompensated loop gain, Tu = Gvd*Hsense*(1/VM) 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 Exact magnitude and phase responses (MATLAB) Target cross-over frequency f c = f s /1 = 1 khz phase [deg] -1-2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 frequency [Hz] No phase margin: a lead (PD) compensator is required

Lead (PD) compensator design 1. Choose: f c 1 khz m 53 o 2. Compute: 33 khz 3 khz 3. Find G co to position the crossover frequency: T uo f f o c 2 G co f f p z 1 G co 1 T uo f f c o 2 f f z p 5.45 15 db Magnitude of T u at f c Magnitude of G c at f c

Lead (PD) compensator summary G c ( s) G co s 1 z 1 s s 1 1 p1 p2 Lead compensator HF pole G co 5.45 15 db f z 33 khz f p1 3 khz f 1 khz (=1/1 of f s ) c High-frequency gain of the lead compensator: G co f p1 /f z = 49 (34 db) Added high-frequency pole: f p2 1MHz (= f esr = f s in this example) Practical implementation would require an op-amp with a gain bandwidth product of at least 49*f p2 = 49 MHz

Loop gain with lead (PD) compensator 8dB 6dB 4dB 2dB db T uo G co 28.7 29.7dB G ( s) G c f c co s 1 z 1 s s 1 1 p 1 p 1 khz 2-2dB f z 1kHz f z 33kHz f p 3kHz o -9 o 1 Hz 1 Hz 1 KHz 1 KHz 1 KHz 1 MHz m 53 o -18 o

Add lag (PI) compensator Integrator at low frequencies Choose 1f L < f c so that phase margin stays approximately the same: f L = 8 khz Keep the same cross-over frequency: G c G co G cm 5.45 15 db

Adding PI Compensator 8dB 6dB 4dB 2dB db f L 8kHz f c 1 khz -2dB 1 f L o 1/1 f L PI compensator phase -9 o 1 Hz 1 Hz 1 KHz 1 KHz 1 KHz 1 MHz m 53 o -18

Complete analog PID compensator: summary G cm 5.45 15 db f L 8 khz f z f p1 33 khz 3 khz f p2 1MHz Crossover frequency: Phase margin: f c 1 khz (=1/1 of f s ) 53o m

Magnitude and phase Bode plots of T 8dB 6dB 4dB 2dB db f c 1 khz -2dB Phase of uncompensated T u o Phase of compensated T -9 o 1 Hz 1 Hz 1 KHz 1 KHz 1 KHz 1 MHz m 53 o -18 o

Verification: exact loop gain magnitude and phase responses (MATLAB) 5 Loop Gain [db] f c 15 khz magnitude -5 phase [ deg] -1-5 -1-15 -2-25 3 4 5 6 o m 51. 6 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 frequency [Hz]

Analog PID compensator implementation C 3 C 4 R4 output voltage sense R 1 V ref C 2 _ + R 2 v c control voltage Design equations (approximate) G c ( s) G cm s L 1 1 s z s s 1 1 p1 p2 f z G cm 1 R R 2 1 1 f L 2R C f 2 R 1 R 4 p 1 C 4 2R4C 4 2 1 2 1 C f p 2 2R2 3

Verification of closed-loop responses Closed-loop reference-to-output response Closed-loop output impedance and step-load transient response

Construction of closed-loop T/(1+T) response 8dB 6dB 4dB Closed-loop reference-to-output response v/v ref = T/(1+T) 2dB db v/v ref -2dB -4dB Closed-loop BW f c -6dB -8dB 1 Hz 1 Hz 1 KHz 1 KHz 1 KHz 1 MHz

Closed-loop reference-to-output response 5 Reference-to-output response v/v ref T/(1+T) [db] -5-1 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6

Small-signal step-reference response v o (t) 1.82 1.8 1.78 4.8 5 5.2 5.4 5.6 5.8 6 6.2 6.4 6.6 6.8 x 1-4 1 mv step (1.79 V to 1.8 V) in v ref i L (t) 5 4.8 5 5.2 5.4 5.6 5.8 6 6.2 6.4 6.6 6.8 x 1-4 d(t).5 4.8 5 5.2 5.4 5.6 5.8 6 6.2 6.4 6.6 6.8 2 s/div x 1-4

Small-signal step-reference response v o (t) 1.82 1.8 1.78 4.8 5 5.2 5.41.815.6 5.8 6 6.2 6.4 6.6 6.8 x 1-4 1 mv step (1.79 V to 1.8 V) in v ref 1.85 i L (t) 5 1.8 d(t).5 4.8 5 5.2 5.4 5.6 5.8 6 6.2 6.4 6.6 6.8 1.795 4.8 5 5.2 5.4 5.6 5.8 6 6.2 6.4 6.6 6.8 2 s/div 1.79 1.785 1.78 4.7 4.72 4.74 4.76 4.78 4.8 4.82 4.84 4.86 4.88 4.9 4.92 4.94 4.96 4.98 5 2 s/div Note: duty-cycle command x 1-4 does not saturate, response correlates very well with theory based on linear small-signal models x 1-4 x 1-4

Output impedance Synchronous buck open-loop output impedance R L L R esr Z out ( s) 1 Resr sc R L sl C Z out L = 1 H R L = 3 m C = 2 F R esr =.8 m

Open-loop output impedance: algebra on the graph 8dB 6dB R L L R esr Z out 4dB 2dB 1/C L C db -2dB R L 3 m 3.5 db -4dB f o 11kHz -6dB -8dB R esr.8 m 62 db -1dB 1 Hz 1 Hz 1 KHz 1 KHz 1 KHz 1 MHz

Construction of 1/(1+T) 8dB 6dB 4dB 2dB db -2dB 1 Hz 1 Hz 1 KHz 1 KHz 1 KHz 1 MHz

Construction of closed-loop output impedance 8dB 6dB 4dB Z out, CL Zout 1 T 2dB db -2dB -4dB -6dB -8dB -1dB 1 Hz 1 Hz 1 KHz 1 KHz 1 KHz 1 MHz

Closed-loop output impedance Z out,cl 8dB 6dB 4dB Z out, CL Zout 1 T 2dB db -2dB -4dB 8 m, -42 db -6dB -8dB -1dB Z out,cl 1 Hz 1 Hz 1 KHz 1 KHz 1 KHz 1 MHz

Verification: closed-loop output impedance 5 Output impedance tput impedance [dbohm] Ou -5 open-loop Zout closed-loop l Z out,cl -1 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6

Step-load transient responses v o (t) 1.82 1.8 178 1.78 4.8 5 5.2 5.4 5.6 5.8 6 6.2 6.4 6.6 6.8 x 1-4 2.5-5 A step-load transient i L (t) 5 4.8 5 5.2 5.4 5.6 5.8 6 6.2 6.4 6.6 6.8 x 1-4 d(t).5 4.8 5 5.2 5.4 5.6 5.8 6 6.2 6.4 6.6 6.8 2 s/div x 1-4

Step-load transient responses v o (t) 1.82 1.8 1.78 4.8 5 5.2 5.4 5.6 5.8 6 6.2 6.4 6.6 6.8 1.81 x 1-4 2.5-5 A step-load transient i L (t) 5 1.85 4.8 5 5.2 5.4 5.6 5.8 6 6.2 6.4 6.6 6.8 1.8 1.795 x 1-4 d(t).5 1.79 1.785 4.8 5 5.2 5.4 5.6 5.8 6 6.2 6.4 6.6 6.8 1.78 4.7 4.72 4.74 4.76 4.78 4.8 4.82 4.84 2 s/div x 1-4 4.86 4.88 4.9 4.92 4.94 4.96 4.98 5 2 s/div v 15 mv 1 s settling time x 1-4