Deployment Examples and Guidelines for GPS Synchronization

Similar documents
Solutions. Innovation in Microwave Communications. Backhauling WiMAX on Wide Channel TDD

RADWIN 5000 JET REDEFINING POINT-TO-MULTIPOINT WIRELESS CONNECTIVITY IN SUB-6GHZ BANDS

Point to Multipoint Topologies

TDD and FDD Wireless Access Systems

Boosting Microwave Capacity Using Line-of-Sight MIMO

COPYRIGHT 2008 MESHDYNAMICS, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. DISCLOSURES PROTECTED BY MULTIPLE PATENTS

2012 LitePoint Corp LitePoint, A Teradyne Company. All rights reserved.

Cambium PMP 450 Series PMP 430 / PTP 230 Series PMP/PTP 100 Series Release Notes

RADWIN JET PtMP Beamforming solution for fiber-like connectivity

RADWIN 2000 PORTFOLIO

RADWIN JET POINT-TO-MULTIPOINT BEAMFORMING SOLUTION DELIVERS FIBER-LIKE CONNECTIVITY FOR RESIDENTIAL AND ENTERPRISE

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554

Unlicensed Wireless Multipoint System in Sacramento Metro. Motorola Canopy

Deployment scenarios and interference analysis using V-band beam-steering antennas

Design of Simulcast Paging Systems using the Infostream Cypher. Document Number Revsion B 2005 Infostream Pty Ltd. All rights reserved

RADWIN JET PtMP Beamforming solution delivers fiber-like connectivity for residential and enterprise. 750 Mb

RADWIN JET PtMP Beamforming solution delivers fiber-like connectivity for residential and enterprise. 750 Mbps. PtMP solution with PtP performance

Automatic power/channel management in Wi-Fi networks

Frequency Synchronization in Global Satellite Communications Systems

SOLUTION BRIEF ONE POINT WIRELSS SUITE. PTP LINKPlanner: No Surprises Link Planning for PTP 800 Solutions

Solution Paper: Contention Slots in PMP 450

TIME- OPTIMAL CONVERGECAST IN SENSOR NETWORKS WITH MULTIPLE CHANNELS

StarPlus Hybrid Approach to Avoid and Reduce the Impact of Interference in Congested Unlicensed Radio Bands

RADWIN 5000 HPMP HIGH CAPACITY POINT TO MULTI-POINT. RADWIN 5000 HPMP product brochure RIDE RADWIN 5000 HPMP WIRELESS HIGHWAY

How to Achieve 1Gbps Link Capacity with Microwave Links Bare Truths and False Claims V1.1

Datasheet. Licensed Backhaul Radio. Model: AF-4X. Up to 687 Mbps Real Throughput, Up to 200+ km Range

Full Spectrum: Mission Critical Private Wireless Networks

Technical Requirements for Wireless Broadband Services (WBS) in the Band MHz

Valley Electric Association, Inc.

Dynamic Frequency Hopping in Cellular Fixed Relay Networks

Datasheet. 5 GHz Carrier Backhaul Radio. Model: AF-5X. Up to 500+ Mbps Real Throughput, Up to 200+ km Range. Full-Band Certification including DFS

500 Series AP and SM CAP and CSM Licensed, Reliable Wireless Connectivity

Radio-frequency channel and block arrangements for fixed wireless systems operating in the 42 GHz (40.5 to 43.5 GHz) band. Recommendation ITU-R F.

Wide Area Digital Outdoor Wireless Video Security Surveillance System

RADWIN 5000 HPMP HIGH CAPACITY POINT-TO-MULTIPOINT. RADWIN 5000 HPMP product brochure RIDE THE RADWIN 5000 HPMP WIRELESS HIGHWAY

SPECTRUM SHARING: OVERVIEW AND CHALLENGES OF SMALL CELLS INNOVATION IN THE PROPOSED 3.5 GHZ BAND

Urban WiMAX response to Ofcom s Spectrum Commons Classes for licence exemption consultation

For MESHDYNAMICS SYSTEM INTEGRATORS NETWORK LAYOUT DESIGN AND ANTENNA SELECTION

Multiple Access. Difference between Multiplexing and Multiple Access

RIDE RADWIN 5000 HPMP HIGHWAY. RADWIN 5000 HPMP product brochure. RADWIN 5000 HPMP High Capacity Point to Multi-Point Solution

Recommendation ITU-R M (10/2015)

Radio Frequency Analysis at Fiber-Based Cell Sites

FIXED WIRELESS ACCESS (FWA) SPECTRUM ENGINEERING & FREQUENCY MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES (QUALITATIVE)

Point to Point PTP500

Deployment and Radio Resource Reuse in IEEE j Multi-hop Relay Network in Manhattan-like Environment

iq.link Key Features Comsearch A CommScope Company

White Paper. 850 MHz & 900 MHz Co-Existence. 850 MHz Out-Of-Band Emissions Problem xxxx-xxxreva

Communications Theory and Engineering

Memorylink UltraSync GPS-100M Synchronization Guide. for PTP 600 Series Wireless Ethernet Bridges

UNIT- 3. Introduction. The cellular advantage. Cellular hierarchy

Huawei response to the Ofcom call for input: Fixed Wireless Spectrum Strategy

Envelope Tracking for TD-LTE terminals

MULTI-HOP RADIO ACCESS CELLULAR CONCEPT FOR FOURTH-GENERATION MOBILE COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS

Medium Access Control Protocol for WBANS

Channel selection for IEEE based wireless LANs using 2.4 GHz band

Wireless Medium Access Control and CDMA-based Communication Lesson 14 CDMA2000

Co-existence. DECT/CAT-iq vs. other wireless technologies from a HW perspective

Radio Network Planning for Outdoor WLAN-Systems

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R SF.1719

SOLUTIONS Paper Wi4 Fixed: Point-to-Point Wireless Broadband Solutions. Point-to-Point Connectivity in the 4.9 GHz Public Safety Band

Licensed vs Unlicensed Microwave Technology. Overview of Wireless John Dolmetsch

Communicator II WIRELESS DATA TRANSCEIVER

WiMAX/ Wireless WAN Case Study: WiMAX/ W.wan.6. IEEE 802 suite. IEEE802 suite. IEEE 802 suite WiMAX/802.16

Data and Computer Communications. Tenth Edition by William Stallings

W-band Point to Multipoint Backhaul of 4G -5G mobile in dense cities & fix residential

Figure 1: Overlapping of carriers into common spectral footprint. 328 Innovation Blvd. 1 Wheaton Road, Witham

Recommendation ITU-R M (09/2015)

Basic Radio Settings on the WAP371

Wireless WAN Case Study: WiMAX/ W.wan.6

Feasibility of UMTS-TDD mode in the MHz Band for MBMS

Draft Amendment 1 to Recommendation G.8271 draft for consent

Wireless Networked Systems

Multiplexing. Chapter 8. Frequency Division Multiplexing Diagram. Frequency Division Multiplexing. Multiplexing

Determining the Cause of a High Retry Percentage

ECS455: Chapter 4 Multiple Access

Connecting the Unconnected with Fixed Wireless Broadband A Compelling Solution Even in Unlicensed Band.

RADWIN 2000 Portfolio. Built for Backhaul

IEEE C /07. IEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <

ETSI SMG#24 TDoc SMG2 898 / 97 Madrid, Spain December 15-19, 1997 Source: SMG2. Concept Group Delta WB-TDMA/CDMA: Evaluation Summary

Co-Existence of UMTS900 and GSM-R Systems

License Exempt Spectrum and Advanced Technologies. Marianna Goldhammer Director Strategic Technologies

(some) Device Localization, Mobility Management and 5G RAN Perspectives

Spectrum Management and Cognitive Radio

Motorola Wireless Broadband Technical Brief OFDM & NLOS

Seeking Partnership for Pilot Test-beds for Assessing Broadband Deployment in UHF-TV White Space of India

Multipath and Diversity

Combiner Space Diversity in Long Haul Microwave Radio Networks

4.9 INTERFERENCE TESTING

Enabling 5G. Catching the mmwave. Enabling the 28GHz and 24GHz spectrum opportunity

Contents. Telecom Systems Chae Y. Lee. FDM Bell Systems s FDM Synchronous TDM T1, T3 Statistical TDM Multiple Access: FDMA, TDMA, CDMA

Cisco Conducting Cisco Unified Wireless Site(R) Survey. Download Full Version :

AW900i. User s Manual. Point-to-point. Industrial-grade, ultra-long-range 900 MHz non-line-of-sight wireless Ethernet systems

LTE-Advanced and Release 10

All Beamforming Solutions Are Not Equal

DISTRIBUTION AND BACKHAUL

COPYRIGHT 2010 MESHDYNAMICS, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. DISCLOSURES PROTECTED BY MULTIPLE PATENTS

Advanced Microwave Antenna Designs Address Growing Capacity and Cost Challenges

Airmux GA Release Presented by: Amnon Wiesel Product Line Manager, Airmux Family

Planning of LTE Radio Networks in WinProp

t-series The Intelligent Solution for Wireless Coverage and Capacity

Transcription:

Application Note: Deployment Examples and Guidelines for GPS Synchronization For Multipoint and PTP Wireless Links This document provides deployment examples and guidelines for GPS synchronization networks using Solectek s GPS MAC protocol. GPS synchronization is a useful tool for co-locating radios and is strongly recommended for densely deployed networks where multiple radios are mounted in close proximity at a tower of rooftop site. For details of how GPS synchronization and Solectek GPS MAC works, please refer to the white paper titled GPS Synchronization available for download at Solectek web site, www.solectek.com.

Examples of Proper GPS Synchronization Deployment Case I: Single Base Station Site The simplest and most common case involves a single site deployment comprised of multiple base station sectors. All base stations are synchronized. The following diagram illustrates what happens during downlink and uplink time slots. Any one of available D/U ratios (1:9 to 9:1) can be used with this configuration, but it is important to note that all of the synchronized radios must be configured with the same D/U ratio, once you select one D/U ratio for the network. The left diagram indicates a downlink time slot during which all base stations are transmitting and sending data to subscriber units. The right diagram indicates a time slot during which all base stations are receiving data from subscriber units. NOTE For a single deployment case, GPS signal is NOT absolutely necessary for successful operation. Even if the GPS signal is lost or the GPS receiver module fails, the internal clock in the GPS Controller will continue to provide reference pulse signals to radio units and synchronization will be preserved. It is strongly recommended that the GPS failure is investigated and the GPS reference signaling is restored. You can check on the status of GPS signals by logging into the GPS Controller s GUI.

Case II: Single Aggregation Site of PTP Links This configuration involves an aggregation of potentially a large number of PTP links. For example, images from surveillance cameras deployed region-wide need to be transported to a central monitoring center. Due to high-resolution requirements, the customer may want to use dedicated PTP links, but a large number of PTP links installed at a central site may cause cross-interference. You can look at this in a similar way to Case I by considering PTP Master units to function similarly to base stations. Any one of available D/U ratios (1:9 to 9:1) can be used with this configuration. Again, all of the radios must be configured with the same D/U ratio, once you select one D/U ratio for the network. At the central site, make sure to configure radios to be PTP Master units so that all co-located radios are transmit/receive synchronized. All of the Master PTP units need to be connected to the GPS Controller, shown at the bottom of the central site.

Case III: A Station Site with more than 5 radio units This configuration is for the case of locating more than 5 radios at a single tower. Each GPS Controller can support up to 5 radios. Deploying one more GPS controller will allow synchronization up to a total of 10 radios on a single tower. Each GPS Controller independently obtains GPS signals from satellites. Thus, there is no need for connection between GPS Controllers. CAUTION If there are two or more GPS Controllers deployed in your synchronized network, use of GPS signals as reference is critical. Internal clocks cannot be controlled precisely and signal drift can occur very quickly, causing loss of synchronization and potential degradation of network performance. CAUTION If synchronized radios are of mixed variety, multipoint base stations and PTP links, the requirement in Case V below must be satisfied. Case IV: Multiple Base Station Sites This is an extension of Case I where there are now multiple base station sites. This is a regional deployment scenario for larger area coverage. All base stations are synchronized by the controller at the site. All of the controllers are in turn synchronized by the common GPS signal. As with Case I, all D/U ratios can be used with this configuration.

Shown here are three different sites. Each site has multiple base stations co-located. Through the use of a common GPS signal, all of these base stations can be synchronized. CAUTION Unlike the case of a single site deployment, multi-site synchronization WILL require GPS signals as the common reference for ALL of the radios to be synchronized. Case V: Single Base Station Site, PTP Backhaul to Center This is the case where you want to add a backhaul PTP kit to a synchronized base station site. This is useful when your backhaul PTP kit is operating in the same frequency band as the base stations on site. This works well when the D/U ratio is set to be 5:5. However, when the asymmetric ratio is used, there is traffic mismatch and information overflow could occur. For example, consider you are using the 2:8 ratio, uplink heavy, multipoint network for camera backhaul, along with the PTP link at the same site. A PTP Master unit is synchronized with base stations. During the camera upload cycle, multipoint base stations and PTP Master unit are in received mode, which represents 80% of the cycle. Unfortunately, this means that PTP link time slot is configured as 80% from central to base site and 20% from base site to central. The PTP link then has to squeeze all of the camera images in its 20% time slot (and 80% time slot is mostly wasted). This creates a bandwidth imbalance between the multipoint networks and PTP backhaul, the effect being more pronounced for highly asymmetric ratios like 1:9 and 2:8. Given this, this type of setup with asymmetric D/U ratio is NOT RECOMMENDED for field deployment. In the above diagram, the site on the left has many base stations co-located. A PTP link is used to backhaul the base station traffic to another site (central gathering point, for example). A PTP Master unit is located at the base station site on the left and it is connected to the PTP Slave unit at the other site.

Case VI: Multiple Base Station Sites, PTP Backhauls to Center This is an extension of Case III where there are multiple base station sites and aggregated traffic from each site needs to be brought to a central site, using PTP kits operating in the same frequency band. The same rules apply to this case as Case III. Technically, it will work well for the 5:5 symmetric D/U radio. Any asymmetry will create an unbalanced traffic pattern between base stations and PTP backhaul kits. In the above, there are two separate sites shown. Each site has multiple co-located base stations. The two sites are connected using a PTP link. This is NOT allowed because a PTP Slave unit must be located at one of the two sites and it cannot be co-located with base stations. Case VII: Daisy-Chain of PTP Links This is a case of having a series of PTP links using intermediate sites. The user must make sure that each site must have the same type of PTP units, either master units or slave units, but not mix them together.

Improper Uses of GPS Synchronization The following cases are NOT proper use of GPS synchronization and should be avoided. Counter Case I: Two Base Station Sites, connected with PTP Backhaul This case will NOT work. When all base stations are in time slots to uplink (client to base direction), the synchronized PTP kit is also in the uplink mode, meaning the Slave unit is transmitting and the Master unit is receiving. During this time slot, the Slave unit transmitter is interfering with base station receivers, causing cross-interference between the two units. NOTE In many case, it is more practical to backhaul the traffic to central using completely different frequency band so you can leave the PTP link outside of the synchronization network. A common choice is licensed microwave links operating in 6-38 GHz. Counter Case II: PTP Ring This represents a common use case for customers who would like to achieve fail-over redundancy. The topology consists of a ring around all of the nodes by connecting with PTP links. The trouble with this scenario is that successful configuration depends on the number of nodes involved in the design. Basically, each site must have two PTP units of the same type, either Slave units or Master units. If there is an even number of nodes in the ring, the scheme will work out. For odd numbers, however, you will be forced to put one Master and one Slave on two of the nodes, which defeats the purpose.

Also, even in even-node cases, if you were to put multipoint base stations on ring node sites, you can only put them on sites where PTP Master units are located, so only half of the sites can be used with multipoint systems. In the above ring case with an even number of nodes, you can make the co-location work at every site. Note that you may not co-locate multipoint base stations at nodes with PTP Slave units. In the above ring case with an odd number of nodes, you cannot make the co-location work at one of the sites. One site (the top site in this example) has to have a slave and a master unit, not an allowable condition for GPS synchronization.

General GPS Deployment Guidelines As you can see from the above cases, there are general rules that must be followed in all cases If two or more GPS Controllers are used in your synchronization network, make sure that the GPS reference signal is working properly. You can log into the controller GUI to verify this. The GPS D/U ratio (1:9 to 9:1) and choice of frame sizes (10ms or 20ms) must the same across the entire GPS synchronization network. If you want your backhaul PTP link to be a part of your synchronization network, make sure to understand the impact of using an asymmetric D/U ratio. The bandwidth imbalance may cause instability in your network. As a general rule of thumb, only PTP master units can be co-located with base stations at the same site. If a Slave unit is co-located with base stations, cross-interference will occur and the synchronization will not work. Sometimes, a link is simply not suitable for inclusion in your synchronization network. In that case, it is best if you do not force the situation. Keep it outside of the synchronization network and make sure that its operating channel is well separated from the rest and that there is a good physical separation from other radio units. In addition, the following steps must be taken from the radio configuration perspective. When operating in 20MHz channel sizes, it is best to avoid adjacent channels on the same tower. A channel center separation of 40MHz is sufficient for normal operation for co-location. For a 40MHz channel size operation, adjacent channel deployment is allowed. Users should take care to set the Tx power at the optimum levels. In general, sufficient link margins should be maintained, but in short distance links, Tx power levels may need to be reduced to prevent radio receiver saturation. In addition, excessive Tx power levels may contribute to higher chances of interference in densely deployed areas. When planning base station sectors, make sure that the sector overlap is minimized. Some subscriber units may see signals of equal strengths from two base stations, which may cause degradation of performance for that substation.