LOCATION OF SHARP-TAILED GROUSE AND GREATER PRAIRIE-CHICKEN DISPLAY GROUNDS IN RELATION TO NPPD AINSWORTH WIND ENERGY FACILITY

Similar documents
Wings N Wetlands Bird List

PHOTOGRAPHY. Birding Hotspots of UConn and the Surrounding Area JAMES ADAMS. 9 Merrow Meadow Park Fenton River.7. 5 New Storrs Cemetery 4

Egg Dates for Species that Breed in the SAAS Chapter Area

WVWA 2018 Wissahickon Birdathon Checklist

ZELLWOOD BIRD COUNTS FEBRUARY, 2017

Checklist of birds on Nebraska farms

Commonly Seen Birds of the Prescott Area

Wildlife observations at the Olentangy River Wetland Research Park in 1998

Species Lists / Bird Walk Dates X= Species Seen, ssp or morph noted; X New Species at CCNHC; X First of Season Migrant

Rancocas Birds Bar Graphs

Alvord Lake BCS number: 48-2

Ute Mountain Mesa Verde Birding Festival Bird Species Tally May 10 14, 2017

HUNGRYLAND BIRD LIST

Birds are the most vivid expression of life Roger Tory Peterson

Nova Scotia Christmas Bird Count 2014

Ute Mountain Mesa Verde Birding Festival Bird Species Tally May 9-13, 2018

Greater White-fronted Goose Snow Goose** Brant Cackling Goose Canada Goose Cackling/Canada - undifferentiated goose sp.

Tour 14: Yellow Jkt Cyn and Cyn of the Ancients Guest Ranch. Tour 12: Nature Center at Butler Corner 1/2 Day. Tour 11: Pontoon on McPhee Reservoir

Team Form including for Feeder Watchers

x x x x x x x Green-winged Teal x x x x x x x Canvasback x x x x x x x Redhead x x x x x x Ring-necked Duck x x x x x x x Greater Scaup

River s End Ranch BCS number: 48-21

Snake River Float Project Summary of Observations 2013

Jaeger sp. 1 White-faced Ibis 2 Peregrine Falcon 1 Lincoln's Sparrow 4 bold

Breeding Safe Dates Sorted by Species

Black-bellied Whistling Duck Fulvous Whistling-Duck Gadwall American Wigeon Mallard Mottled Duck Blue-winged Teal Cinnamon Teal Northern Shoveler

Birds of the Quiet Corner

A Review of Bird Monitoring in Manitoba

Escondido Draw Recreation Area Crockett County, TX M= Spring or Fall Migrant. Bird Species Type

Last Reported Date (Date, Location, Number)

10 th Annual Mono Basin Bird Chautauqua Sightings 2011 All Chautauqua Field Trips and Chautauqua Week

PASSENGER PIGEON. Field Trip: Ohio River East of Cincinnati. facebook CINCINNATI BIRD CLUB

Page 1 of 6. Chicago Ornithological Society: North Pond Bird Walks # weeks seen # individuals 11/13/ /18/2019

Count Summary Report

Bird Observations. Date Range: For. 1 of 5 2/29/2016 8:36 AM. Home About Submit Observations Explore Data My ebird Help

TRIP REPORT NEW JERSEY, U.S.A. 7 TO 14 FEBRUARY 2014

Come one! Come All! Join the Fun! It is the season for The National Audubon Society 116th Annual Christmas Count.

1. Bur Oak Picnic Area. A year-round hot spot for viewing songbirds and raptors.

PART FIVE: Grassland and Field Habitat Management

Tenoroc. Bird List. Symbols used in this checklist. Tenoroc. Wildlife Management Area. Type. Seasons. Breeding. How you can help

Christmas Bird Count

I know that during the winter you migrate. But where do you come from in the spring?

Canton - Emiquon and Area

Fort Bragg CBC. 0cw. Area 5 (Joleen) Area 6 Area 7 Area 8 Area 9 Feeders. Area 5 (Art) 2a (tracks) Area 3 Area 4. Area 5 (Erica)

Observers: David Blue, Will Cox, Kathy Estey, Blair Francis, Don Grine, and Herb Knufken

Area 5 (east) Area 1a (west) Area 1b (east) Area 2 Area 3 Area 4

SUBJECT: Scoped Environmental Impact Statement to Evaluate Species at Risk Potential on the Avalon West Property

Date: April, 20, 2013 Location: Lake Conestee Nature Park, 601 Fork Shoals Rd, Greenville, S.C.

Following are five recommended areas to observe birds on the Refuge.

ZELLWOOD BIRD COUNTS JUNE, 2016

DeSoto National Wildlife Refuge Office in Missouri Valley, Iowa

H. Thomas Bartlett Kelleys Island Monthly Census Data

Avian Studies for the Sanilac County Michigan Wind Power Project: Summary of 2007 Field Seasons - Annual Report

Observers: Blair Francis, Eva Armi, Frank Wong, Phillip White, Amrit Sidhu, David Mathis, Barbara Dunn, Gary Grantham, and Anonymous

Pocahontas County Bird List. Loons. Grebes. Cormorants. Herons & Bitterns

Listed Birds along the Stony Brook Corridor Impacted by BMS Zoning Change

Paulina Marsh BCS number: 48-20

Baskett Slough National Wildlife Refuge BCS number: 47-4

Observers: Herb Knüfken, Bob Glaser, Frank Wong, Kathy Dickey, Eva Armi, Gary Grantham, Ingo Renner, John Bruin, and Anonymous. Total of species 89

PDX Wildlife Program. January 15 th, Nick Atwell Aviation Wildlife Manager

Sea & Sage Audubon Southern Sierra Spring Trip May 16-19, 2014 Bob Barnes, Trip Leader

Circle: Cheep Thrills Count date: 12/15/2011 Count Code: CACT Total Species Count: 164

HRA 2014/15 FIELD TRIP DATA

Washington State Park Bird Census 2017

Hawk Survey Summary 2007

Palmer Hay Flats. Audubon Important Bird Area and State Game Refuge BIRD CHECKLIST.

APPENDIX 5F BIRD AND WILDLIFE POINT COUNTS AND AREA SEARCH SURVEYS BY HABITAT TYPE

CHASSAHOWITZKA BIRD LIST

The Birds of Eastshore State Park

Friends of the Mississippi River 46 East Fourth Street, Suite 606 Saint Paul, MN / FAX: 651/

Black-bellied Whistling Duck X X Fulvous Whistling Duck Canada Goose X X X X X Trumpeter Swan X X Wood

Great Blue Heron Great Egret Snowy Egret Little Blue Heron Tricolored Heron* Cattle Egret Green Heron Black-crowned Night-Heron Yellow-crowned Night-

Ruby-throated Hummingbird Black Rail* Clapper Rail* King Rail Virginia Rail Sora Common Gallinule American Coot Sandhill Crane Black-necked Stilt*

Evaluating Point Count Efficiency Relative to Territory Mapping in Cropland Birds 1

Catalog of Upper Mississippi River and Great Lakes Region Joint Venture GIS Data March 2009 Version 1

Memo. Kevin Maddoux, Felsburg Holt & Ullevig. Jane Hann, Colorado Department of Transportation Kurt Kellogg, Felsburg Holt & Ullevig

2003 ANALYSIS OF AVIAN GUILD SPECIES DIVERSITY IN THE CARMEL RIVER RIPARIAN CORRIDOR. Twelfth Annual Report

Northeast Swale Walking Bird Survey Form 2010

Ladd Marsh Wildlife Area BCS number: 49-3

Passenger Pigeon. In This Issue. Newsletter of the Cincinnati Bird Club. January Program. January Field Trip. January Best Bird Contest

WOW 2016 Species List

Database corrections for the 50th Christmas Bird Count 1

BIRDS OF THE DELMARVA PENINSULA, DE - MD - VA

2009 Winter Bird Survey

A Practical Challenge for Atlasers: Identifying Juvenile Birds

July to December Latest. Max Nbr Nbr Date Year Date Year Nbr Recs Yrs Date Year Date Year Nbr Recs Yrs Greater White-fronted Goose

Yearly Total Summary, Birds Banded, 1995 through 2012 Dan Brown's Hummer Ranch, Christoval, Texas Listed in Phylogenetic Order

Long-billed Curlew Surveys in the Mission Valley, 2017

CBC Year Count Season

Managing Iowa Habitats

SEASONAL DISTRIBUTION OF BIRDS AT THE BAKER UNIVERSITY WETLANDS

Expedition to North Carolina Inner/Outer Banks February 8-11, 2018

Double-crested Cormorant fairly common migrant/winter visitor to ponds

B I RD SPEC I ES ASSOC I ATED W I TH GREEN ASH WOODLANDS IN THE SLIM BUTTES, SOUTH DAKOTA

Black Swamp Bird Observatory Navarre, Ottawa NWR Banding Station Spring 2016

Species A B C D E F. Michigan Bird Survey - Autumn 2016 Earliest Arrival (Date, Location, Number) Maximum Count (Date, Location, Number)

AMHERST COLLEGE BIRD SURVEY (116 species total) Submitted Oct 31, 2008, by Pete Westover, Conservation Works, LLC

FLORIDA BREEDING BIRD ATLAS GUIDELINES FOR SAFE DATES FOR SELECTED BREEDING CODES. BBA Newsletter Number 6, May 1988 and subsequent updates.

KANSAS ORNITHOLOGICAL SOCIETY

Sandhill Cranes and Waterfowl of the North Platte River Valley: Evaluation of Habitat Selection to Guide Conservation Delivery

Tosohatchee. Bird List. Symbols used in this checklist. Tosohatchee. Wildlife Management Area. Type. Seasons. Breeding.

Transcription:

LOCATION OF SHARP-TAILED GROUSE AND GREATER PRAIRIE-CHICKEN DISPLAY GROUNDS IN RELATION TO NPPD AINSWORTH WIND ENERGY FACILITY 2006-2011 NEBRASKA GAME AND PARKS COMMISSION Bill Vodehnal, District Manager, Wildlife Division-Sandhills District, Bassett, NE Collected and compiled by Biologist I Andrew Pierson (2006), Travis Doeden (2007), Michael Schultz (2008), Michael D. Blount (2009-2010), Evan Suhr (2011)

Introduction Wind energy is a rapidly developing renewable energy technology, not only in Nebraska, but across the country and around the world. Some members of the conservation community have recently voiced concerns that wind energy facilities have the potential for adversely affecting aerial wildlife (e.g., birds, bats) and the habitats they occupy. Habitat fragmentation, disturbance, or mortality through collisions with turbine blades or support structures are suggested adverse effects. The primary objective of this cooperative project between Nebraska Public Power District (NPPD), Nebraska Game and Parks Commission (NGPC), and private landowners was to conduct a comprehensive and systematic search to map and collect baseline data on prairie grouse display ground locations in the vicinity of the wind energy facility. The NPPD Wind Energy Facility, six miles south of Ainsworth, Nebraska, consists of 36 turbines, one meteorological tower and a central substation. NPPD has lease options with property owners on approximately 11,520 acres of open pasture including old and existent farmsteads, and small groves of trees, ponds, and wetlands. Less than 50 acres of grassland were taken out of production (for roads, substations, and turbines). Ground breaking on the facility took place in April of 2005 with operations beginning in September of the same year. Plains sharp-tailed grouse (Tympanuchus phasianellus jamesi) and greater prairie-chicken (Tympanuchus cupido pinnatus), collectively known as prairie grouse, are species native to the Sandhills prairie and larger grassland landscapes. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service identified the greater prairie-chicken as a species of concern due to loss from much of its historic range and one of the highest priority species for conservation. The Nebraska Natural Legacy Project, a collaborative planning effort lead by the Nebraska Game and Parks Commission and comprehensive wildlife conservation strategy for Nebraska, also identifies the greater prairie-chicken as a priority species for management focus. Methods Sharp-tailed grouse and greater prairie-chicken display grounds were surveyed during spring (2006-2011) on the facility and within a 1-2 mile radius of the facility (approximately 25 sections). Prairie grouse populations are generally monitored and evaluated based on spring breeding male counts and display ground counts in a defined geographic area. Surveys were conducted between April 24-May 12, 2006; April 12- May 13, 2007; April 15-22, 2008; April 6-20, 2009; April 7-28, 2010; and April 14-26, 2011. The surveys consisted of listening for display ground activity along existing roads and trails and from prominent hills and then attempting to approach and locate each display ground. Surveying was conducted during peak breeding activity, generally beginning one half to one hour prior to sunrise and terminating approximately two hours after sunrise. Some display grounds were also located by visual sightings of birds while en route to other sites. A global positioning system was used to determine the universal transverse mercator (UTM) coordinates for the center of each display ground. Once display grounds were located, at least two attempts were made to count both displaying males and the total number of birds present.

Results Eight sharp-tailed grouse dancing grounds and 8 greater prairie-chicken booming grounds (Figure 1) have been recorded since the project was started in 2006. Table 1 gives the UTM-coordinates of each display ground. Of the 16 grounds located, 6 sharp-tailed grouse and 4 greater prairie-chicken display grounds were located within the 11,000 acres that NPPD leases for its facility. The remaining sharp-tailed grouse and greater prairiechicken display grounds were found on privately owned land adjacent to the facility. Based on the number of display grounds located across the survey area, we recorded a display ground density of approximately 10 grounds per 50 square kilometers or 0.2 display grounds per square kilometer. Five greater prairie-chicken booming grounds and 5 sharp-tailed grouse dancing grounds were located in lowland sites consisting of valleys, wetland complexes, lowland windmill flats and mowed sub-irrigated meadows. Four greater prairie-chicken booming grounds and 4 sharp-tailed grouse dancing grounds were located on upland sites in the hills and elevated pasture grounds. The closest distance a greater prairie-chicken display ground was located to the nearest wind turbine was 2,809.8 feet and the closest sharp-tailed grouse display ground to the nearest wind turbine was 2,547.3 feet (Table 3). The farthest distance that a greater prairie-chicken display ground was located from the nearest wind turbine was 8,167.6 feet and the farthest sharptail grouse display ground from the nearest wind turbine was 7,278.5 feet (Table 3). In 2006, a total of 70 greater prairie-chickens and 66 sharp-tailed grouse were counted on the 13 grounds (Table 2). An attempt was made to count displaying males but was unsuccessful for several of the grounds due to inability to obtain a vantage point to view and sex birds on the ground without flushing. Prairie-chicken booming grounds ranged from 2 to 15 birds with an average of 10 birds per ground. Sharp-tailed grouse dancing grounds ranged from 8 to 20 birds with an average of 11 birds per ground. Sharp-tailed grouse and greater prairie-chicken display grounds were monitored again in 2007. Six sharp-tailed grouse dancing grounds and 7 greater prairie-chicken booming grounds were monitored, but one prairie-chicken ground was not present (Figure 1). A total of 80 greater prairie-chickens and 55 sharp-tailed grouse were observed (Table 2). Greater prairie-chicken booming grounds ranged from 2 to 37 birds with an average of 13.3 birds per ground. The sharp-tailed grouse dancing grounds ranged from 3 to 15 birds with an average of 9.2 birds per ground. There was an effort once again to count displaying males but was unsuccessful on many grounds. All sharp-tailed grouse and greater prairie-chicken display grounds previously visited were monitored in 2008 and a greater effort was placed on sexing grounds (Figure 1). Males were counted, but on several of the display grounds, not all males could be seen prior to flushing the ground to obtain a total count. A total of 81 greater prairie-chickens were on 5 grounds and 53 sharp-tailed grouse were observed on 4 grounds (Table 2). Greater prairie-chicken grounds ranged from 9 to 29 birds with an average of 16.2 birds per ground. Chicken booming grounds had 50 displaying males that ranged from 5 to 21 males per ground with an average of 10 males per ground. Sharp-tailed grouse grounds ranged from 11 to 18 with an average of 13.2 birds per ground. Sharp-tailed grouse

dancing grounds had 32 displaying males that ranged from 7 to 10 males per ground with an average of 8 males per ground. In the spring of 2009, all sharp-tailed grouse and prairie-chicken display grounds previously recorded were checked. Six greater prairie-chicken display grounds had a total of 95 birds and sharp-tailed grouse had a total of 56 birds on 5 display grounds. Greater prairie-chicken grounds ranged from 2 to 27 birds and an average of 13.6 birds per ground. Chicken grounds had 79 displaying males that ranged from 2 to 21 males per ground with an average of 11.2 males per ground. Sharp-tailed grouse display grounds ranged from 6 to 20 birds with an average of 11.2 birds per ground. Sharp-tailed grouse grounds had 54 displaying males that ranged from 6 to19 males per ground with an average of 10.8 males per ground. In the spring of 2010, all sharp-tailed grouse and greater prairie-chicken display grounds previously recorded were checked along with the discovery of one new sharp-tailed grouse and one greater prairie-chicken display ground (GPC 9 and STG 8; Table 1). Seven greater prairie-chicken display grounds had a total of 94 birds and sharp-tailed grouse had a total of 73 birds on 6 display grounds. Greater prairie-chicken grounds ranged from 3 to 29 birds and an average of 13.4 birds per ground. Chicken grounds had 73 displaying males that ranged from 3 to 24 males per ground with and average of 10.4 males per ground. Sharp-tailed grouse display grounds ranged from 8 to 22 birds with and average of 12.2 birds per ground. Sharp-tailed grouse grounds had 58 displaying males that ranged from 6 to 18 males per ground with an average of 9.6 males per ground. Monitoring of all previously documented display grounds was continued during the spring of 2011. All grounds that were located since 2006 were checked at least twice. One new sharp-tailed grouse display ground was discovered (STG 7; Table 1; Fig. 1). A total of 46 greater prairie-chickens and 37 sharp-tailed grouse were observed on 4 grounds for each species (Table 2). Greater prairie-chicken display grounds had between 6 and 24 birds present, averaging 12 birds per ground. Chicken booming grounds had 41 displaying males ranging from 6 to 20 males per display ground, with an average of 10 males per ground. Sharp-tailed grouse display grounds had between 6 to 12 birds, averaging 9 birds per ground. Grouse dancing grounds had 32 displaying males ranging from 5 to 10 males per display ground, with an average of 8 males per ground. Discussion The ideal scenario would include pre- and post- installation monitoring of display grounds to assess the impacts of facility development, but no preliminary monitoring was conducted at this site. This inventory reveals that prairie grouse are using the habitat within and surrounding the facility. There is a wide range of expectations for population densities in the Sandhills. However, based on data obtained during similar surveys along NGPC Spring Grouse Routes in Brown and Rock counties, population densities for both species are within range of what we might expect. Of interest now would be to determine if the towers influence the numbers of birds and the distribution of display grounds over a relatively long period.

Dr. John Toepfer, a wildlife research scientist for Society Tympanuchus Cupido Pinnatus, Ltd. in Wisconsin spent three days observing the facility in early May 2006. In addition to our observations of activity on display grounds, John noted that single prairie-chicken and sharp-tailed grouse hens probably in egg laying were regularly observed along the roads and in close proximity to the towers. Also observed within proximity of individual towers were upland sandpipers, meadowlarks, and waterfowl. Gadwalls, Canada geese, mallards, widgeon, and blue-winged teal pairs were observed on the ponds within the complex. Birds observed in 2007 included Canada geese, mallards, pintail, bufflehead, ring-necked duck, northern shoveler, meadowlark, red-winged blackbird, mourning dove, cardinal, great-horned owl, northern flicker, red-tailed hawk, American crow, American kestrel, eastern bluebird, eastern phoebe, American robin, downy woodpecker, cooper s hawk, killdeer, eastern screech owl, nighthawk, northern harrier, dark-eyed junco, and horned lark. There were no upland sandpipers observed in 2007. Birds recorded in 2008 included Canada geese, mallards, pintail, bufflehead, ring-necked duck, northern shoveler, gadwall, blue-winged teal, lesser scaup, redhead, widgeon, wood duck, lesser yellowlegs, Wilson s phalarope, long-billed curlew, upland sandpiper, great blue heron, killdeer, brown-headed cowbird, red-winged blackbird, meadowlark, mourning dove, American robin, horned lark, grackle, European starlings, tree swallow, eastern phoebe, white crowned sparrow, prairie falcon, and northern harrier. There were a large abundance of upland sandpipers observed in the spring of 2008. Birds observed while conducting the 2009 sharp-tailed grouse and greater prairie-chicken survey included mallard, pintail, bufflehead, northern shoveler, blue-winged teal, upland sandpiper, killdeer, brown-headed cowbird, red-winged blackbird, horned lark, meadowlark, mourning dove, American robin, white crowned sparrow, American kestrel, red-tailed hawk, and turkey vulture. Birds observed while conducting the 2010 sharp-tailed grouse and greater prairie-chicken survey included mallards, northern shoveler, blue-winged teal, killdeer, yellow-headed blackbird, red-winged blackbird, horned lark, meadowlark, morning dove, American robin, turkey vulture, grackle, white crowned sparrow. Other bird species were not recorded during the 2011 prairie grouse survey. The number of male (and total) prairie grouse observed while conducting the 2011 survey appeared to decline considerably compared to the 2010 counts (Table 2). Male greater prairie-chickens and total chicken numbers were 44% and 51% less, respectively, than the number of birds counted in 2010. Male sharp-tailed grouse and total grouse numbers were 45% and 49% lower, respectively, than those observed during the 2010 prairie grouse survey. We believe the decline in numbers is attributed to poor nesting success and/or brood survival due to the cold, wet weather experienced during June 2010. The spring census counts for all breeding routes in the Sandhills for 2011 is not available at

this writing, but it is believed that breeding male counts will be down substantially due to June 2010 weather. June 2011 weather was similar to 2010, thus counts could be lower in 2012. Prior to the 2011 spring census counts, seasonal employees obtained the display ground counts with some initial guidance and recommendations by the project leader, Bill Vodehnal. During 2011, Bill conducted all counts and visited each display ground that was recorded in previous years 2-3 times in April. It was determined that 2 GPC grounds (GPC 4 and GPC 8) and 2 STG grounds (STG 4 and STG 7) were actually the same ground due to distance between grounds and only one visit recorded, thus grounds were combined to represent GPC 4 and STG 4 in this report. Acknowledgements The Nebraska Game and Parks Commission would like to thank the Nebraska Public Power District, especially Rocky Pletner, Chris Derickson, Bob Keller, Toby Tobiasson, Jack Martin and Jered Saars, for allowing us to carry out this project and their assistance in performing the survey and preparing this report. We would also like to thank Sid, John, and Steve Salzman, Fred and Cliff Assarsson, Blair Williams, Lyle Forgey, and Ralph Johnson for graciously allowing us to conduct surveys on their property. The Nebraska Game and Parks Commission looks forward to the continued monitoring of these sites in the attempt to broaden our knowledge of wind energy and its effects on habitat use.

Table 1. Prairie grouse display ground locations. GPS Identifier UTM Prefix UTM x-coordinate UTM y-coordinate GPC 1 14T 426984 4697465 GPC 2 14T 428416 4698410 GPC 3 14T 425473 4701318 GPC 4 14T 427514 4696967 GPC 5 14T 424652 4701592 GPC 6 14T 422631 4703258 GPC 7 14T 422145 4700458 GPC 9 14T 427201 4699260 STG 1 14T 422832 4700938 STG 2 14T 425256 4699039 STG 3 14T 425474 4697892 STG 4 14T 426946 4698608 STG 5 14T 421199 4702254 STG 6 14T 422038 4700301 STG 7 14T 423565 4702483 STG 8 14T 427536 4697497

Table 2. Greater prairie-chicken (GPC) and sharp-tailed grouse (STG) display ground counts. Ground Number Species/Lek 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Greater prairiechicken Total Total Total Total Total Total 1 GPC 1 15 8 0 17 4 21 10 4 14 6 0 6 2 GPC 2 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 GPC 3 11 11 6 6 10 3 13 17 3 20 13 3 16 8 1 9 6 GPC 4 12 9 5 2 7 9 2 11 3 0 3 0 0 0 9 GPC 5 9 3 12 18 7 3 10 2 2 7 2 9 7 0 7 12 GPC 6 11 2 13 37 21 6 27 21 6 27 24 5 29 20 4 24 13 GPC 7 2 2 2 2 7 4 11 9 1 10 6 2 8 0 0 0 15 GPC 9 10 5 15 0 0 0 Total GPC 33 10 70 8 80 50 18 68 75 16 91 73 21 94 41 5 46 Sharp-tailed grouse 4 STG 1 8 13 8 5 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 STG 2 20 15 10 2 12 19 1 20 18 4 22 10 2 12 7 STG 3 9 3 0 7 7 8 2 10 0 0 0 8 STG 4 13 15 7 2 9 14 14 12 4 16 0 0 0 10 STG 5 8 4 7 4 11 8 1 9 7 1 8 5 1 6 11 STG 6 8 5 0 6 6 6 2 8 0 0 0 17 STG 8 7 2 9 9 1 10 16 STG 7 8 1 9 Total STG 66 55 32 13 45 54 2 56 58 15 73 32 5 37

Table 3. Greater prairie-chicken (GPC) and sharp-tailed grouse (STG) display ground distance to the nearest wind turbine. Ground Number Species/Lek Display ground distance from wind turbine 1 GPC 1 5,854.3 ft 2 GPC 2 7,122.1 ft 3 GPC 3 3,403.2 ft 6 GPC 4 7,932.6 ft 9 GPC 5 3,020.5 ft 12 GPC 6 3,150.1 ft 13 GPC 7 4,220.3 ft 15 GPC 9 2,809.8 ft 4 STG 1 2,968.5 ft 5 STG 2 3,733.7 ft 7 STG 3 4,943.4 ft 8 STG 4 2,566.7 ft 10 STG 5 2,547.3 ft 11 STG 6 4,294.3 ft 16 STG 7 2,576.1 ft 17 STG 8 7,278.5 ft