Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2017

Similar documents
Our Corporate Responsibility pages 2016

ONR Strategy 2015 to 2020

responsiveness. Report. Our sole Scope of work period; Activities outside the Statements of future Methodology site level); Newmont; 3.

Office for Nuclear Regulation Strategy

IAASB Main Agenda (March, 2015) Auditing Disclosures Issues and Task Force Recommendations

Gender pay gap reporting tight for time

CCG 360 o Stakeholder Survey

Mde Françoise Flores, Chair EFRAG 35 Square de Meeûs B-1000 Brussels Belgium January Dear Mde.

Making a difference: the cultural impact of museums. Executive summary

Accountable Officer Report

Standards for 14 to 19 education

Competency Standard for Registration as a Professional Engineer

VDMA Response to the Public Consultation Towards a 7 th EU Environmental Action Programme

For personal use only

South West Public Engagement Protocol for Wind Energy

United Nations Statistics Division Programme in Support of the 2020 Round of Population and Housing Censuses

Mr Hans Hoogervorst Chairman International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom

Tuning-CALOHEE Assessment Frameworks for the Subject Area of CIVIL ENGINEERING The Tuning-CALOHEE Assessment Frameworks for Civil Engineering offers

demonstrator approach real market conditions would be useful to provide a unified partner search instrument for the CIP programme

Innovation Systems and Policies in VET: Background document

Smart Management for Smart Cities. How to induce strategy building and implementation

Looking over the Horizon Visioning and Backcasting for UK Transport Policy

BUILDING CAPACITIES: ENTREPRENEURIAL LEARNING AND SME SKILLS

Integrated Reporting WG

Collaboration Agreement

Robert Bond Partner, Commercial/IP/IT

West Norfolk CCG. CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2014 Main report. Version 1 Internal Use Only Version 7 Internal Use Only

The work under the Environment under Review subprogramme focuses on strengthening the interface between science, policy and governance by bridging

The Policy Content and Process in an SDG Context: Objectives, Instruments, Capabilities and Stages

Access to Medicines, Patent Information and Freedom to Operate

LLOYDS BANKING GROUP MATTERS RESERVED TO THE BOARDS (LLOYDS BANKING GROUP PLC, LLOYDS BANK PLC, BANK OF SCOTLAND PLC & HBOS PLC)

Senate Bill (SB) 488 definition of comparative energy usage

Abstracts of the presentations during the Thirteenth round of informal consultations of States Parties to the Agreement (22-23 May 2018)

Agenda Item 4: Transport Strategy: Vision and Objectives

COST FP9 Position Paper

Directions in Auditing & Assurance: Challenges and Opportunities Clarified ISAs

ECU Research Commercialisation

TENTATIVE REFLECTIONS ON A FRAMEWORK FOR STI POLICY ROADMAPS FOR THE SDGS

Engaging UK Climate Service Providers a series of workshops in November 2014

Evaluation report. Evaluated point Grade Comments

Supportive publishing practices in DRR: Leaving no scientist behind

Dear Secretary of State Parreira, Dear President Aires-Barros, Dear ALLEA delegates, esteemed faculty of today s workshop,

Doing, supporting and using public health research. The Public Health England strategy for research, development and innovation

Enfield CCG. CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2015 Main report. Version 1 Internal Use Only Version 1 Internal Use Only

Oxfordshire CCG. CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2015 Main report. Version 1 Internal Use Only Version 1 Internal Use Only

Southern Derbyshire CCG. CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2015 Main report. Version 1 Internal Use Only Version 1 Internal Use Only

South Devon and Torbay CCG. CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2015 Main report Version 1 Internal Use Only

Assessing the Welfare of Farm Animals

Portsmouth CCG. CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2015 Main report. Version 1 Internal Use Only Version 1 Internal Use Only

GUIDELINES SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES RESEARCH MATTERS. ON HOW TO SUCCESSFULLY DESIGN, AND IMPLEMENT, MISSION-ORIENTED RESEARCH PROGRAMMES

A Science & Innovation Audit for the West Midlands

European Charter for Access to Research Infrastructures - DRAFT

WHY ACCOUNTANCY & SOCIAL DESIGN

Information and Communications Technology and Environmental Regulation: Critical Perspectives

International comparison of education systems: a European model? Paris, November 2008

Mutual Learning Programme Database of National Labour Market Practices. Step-by-Step Guide


Sutton CCG. CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2015 Main report. Version 1 Internal Use Only Version 1 Internal Use Only

NHS SOUTH NORFOLK CLINICAL COMMISSIONING GROUP COMMUNICATIONS AND ENGAGEMENT STRATEGY

ICAEW is pleased to respond to your request for comments on the consultation paper Considerations of Materiality in Financial Reporting.

GROUP OF SENIOR OFFICIALS ON GLOBAL RESEARCH INFRASTRUCTURES

IPRs and Public Health: Lessons Learned Current Challenges The Way Forward

Banco de Sabadell, S.A. Policy on communication and contacts with shareholders, institutional investors and proxy advisors

APPENDIX 1: Cognitive maps of 38 innovative PE cases

Towards a Consumer-Driven Energy System

28 TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF DATA PROTECTION

CCG Improvement and Assessment Framework 2016/17. Briefing Document

Report. RRI National Workshop Germany. Karlsruhe, Feb 17, 2017

"The future of Social Sciences and Humanities in Horizon 2020"

CONTENTS 1. BACKGROUND. 2 Background. 3 Transition Cities / Six Case Studies. 4 Common Features. 5 Broader Innovation Models and Evolving EU Policy

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT TEMASEK. 1. Why was Temasek established?

CCG Assurance and the Balanced Scorecard Balanced Scorecard An overview of the tool, and its role in CCG assurance. Khadir Meer Richard Wells

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

"Workshops on key economic issues regarding the. enforcement of IPR in the European Union"

Statutory Gender Pay Gap Report 2018

Making Materiality Judgements

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL. on the evaluation of Europeana and the way forward. {SWD(2018) 398 final}

Evaluation of the Three-Year Grant Programme: Cross-Border European Market Surveillance Actions ( )

Sutton CCG. CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2014 Summary report. Version 1 Internal Use Only Version 1 Internal Use Only

Enfield CCG. CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2014 Summary report. Version 1 Internal Use Only Version 1 Internal Use Only

The Impact of Foresight on policy-making - Drawing the landscape

The Value of Membership.

Developing the Arts in Ireland. Arts Council Strategic Overview

CO-ORDINATION MECHANISMS FOR DIGITISATION POLICIES AND PROGRAMMES:

An Essential Health and Biomedical R&D Treaty

Ethics Guideline for the Intelligent Information Society

Chief Nuclear Inspector s Inspection of NNB GenCo Ltd. s Supply Chain Management Arrangements for the Hinkley Point C Project

VISUAL ARTS COLLECTION COORDINATOR

Research integrity. House of Commons Science and Technology Committee. Submission from the Royal Academy of Engineering.

Strategic Transport Technology Plan

EFRAG 35 Square de Meeus 1000 Brussels Belgium Att.: Chairman Francoise Flores By

FEE Comments on EFRAG Draft Comment Letter on ESMA Consultation Paper Considerations of materiality in financial reporting

Herts Valleys Clinical Commissioning Group. Review of NHS Herts Valleys CCG Constitution

A review of the role and costs of clinical commissioning groups

response Ukie response to Arts Council England Sector Dialogue on Funding 2018 and Beyond Consultation

Whole of Society Conflict Prevention and Peacebuilding

A Framework for. Collaboration

Brief to the. Senate Standing Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology. Dr. Eliot A. Phillipson President and CEO

SETTING FOOD SAFETY RISK ANALYSIS RESEARCH PRIORITIES FOR HORIZON EUROPE. Marta Hugas EFSA Chief Scientist

Advanced Impacts evaluation Methodology for innovative freight transport Solutions

Transcription:

UNITED UTILITIES Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2017 Assurance statement and commentary SEPTEMBER 2017

Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2017: Assurance statement and commentary Assurance statement United Utilities has commissioned Corporate Citizenship to provide external assurance and a commentary on its Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2017. The reporting comprises of the Strategic Report section of the United Utilities Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements for the year ending 31 March 2017 and the Corporate Responsibility section of the group website as at 31 July 2017. The scope of our assurance The assurance provides the reader with an independent, external assessment of the report and, in particular, with how it corresponds with the AA1000 standard. It is intended for the general reader and for more specialist audiences who have a professional interest in United Utilities corporate responsibility performance. United Utilities has chosen to use the AA1000 assurance standard AA1000AS (2008). Our assurance is a Type 1 assurance as defined by the standard, in that it evaluates the nature and extent of adherence to the AA1000AS principles of inclusivity, materiality and responsiveness and assures the behaviour of the organisation as reported here. Our assurance used disclosed information as its starting point and then investigated the underlying systems, processes and sustainability performance information to arrive at its conclusions. The level of assurance is moderate, which means that we believe there to be sufficient evidence to support the statement such that the risk of the conclusion being in error is reduced. In conducting the assurance we have had consideration to the Global Reporting Initiative Principles for Defining Report Content and Ensuring Report Quality. United Utilities is entirely and solely responsible for the contents of the reporting Corporate Citizenship for its assurance. A detailed note of our assurance methodology appears at the end of this statement.

Opinion and conclusions In our opinion the United Utilities Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2017 reflects the principles of AA1000 (2008): inclusivity, materiality and responsiveness. With regard to inclusivity, the principle that people should have a say in the decisions that matter to them, we find that United Utilities has a widespread programme of engagement with stakeholders that shapes its agenda for action. With regard to materiality, the principle that decision makers should be clear about the issues that matter, we find strong evidence throughout the reporting, and particularly in the Annual Report and Financial Statements, of United Utilities prioritizing the most material issues, particularly those related to customers. With regard to responsiveness, the principle that organisations should act transparently on material issues, we find evidence of United Utilities developing and reporting upon the execution of its programmes, particularly taking into account the preferences of customers and the wider public interest of the North West of England. The level of assurance is noted on the previous page. Commentary United Utilities has tightened its focus on key stakeholder groups. This is made absolutely clear in the opening sentence of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer s review: We have continued to improve performance for shareholders, customers and the environment as we aim to deliver further value and sustainable dividends backed by a strong balance sheet. We note that this is not an exhaustive definition of United Utilities key stakeholders. United Utilities is a regionally-based utility. In engaging with the reporting the reader develops a profound sense of the whole of the North West being a key stakeholder. The company exhibits a profound sense of its well-being being bound up with the well-being and prosperity of the North West. In addition United Utilities in its reporting displays a greater interest in the long-term than is normally the case in terms of corporate responsibility. This does not come as a complete surprise. The continued supply of drinking water to a region requires long-term planning in ordinary times, let alone one with the unpredictability associated with climate change. The regulator too requires a long-term view. These factors notwithstanding this aspect of United Utilities approach deserves to be noted.

In our last assurance statement we had cause to comment upon: the volume of effort going into customer stakeholder research. Certainly the single most outstanding feature of this year s assurance has been United Utilities engagement with customers. In reporting United Utilities concentrates particularly on Priority Services, the dedicated support provided for those customers who are experiencing short or long-term personal challenges. This encompasses physical or mental health difficulties and those struggling financially. However, energetic efforts are being put in to help all customers, to use customer participation to improve the product and to provide more modern means of the customer interacting with United Utilities. The improvements delivered are founded on detailed and thoughtful stakeholder engagement. In particular we saw how the work analysing the geographical concentration of people not paying their water bills had developed into the Town Action Planning, which has made a contribution to reducing household bad debt to 2.5 per cent in 2016/17 from 3.0 per cent in the previous year. The reporting also offers evidence of significant progress on other fronts. For instance, self-generated renewable energy is now at 18% with the aim of increasing to 35% by 2020. Our judgements about the reporting were informed and strengthened by consideration of the GRI Principles and The Companies, Partnerships and Groups (Accounts and Non-Financial Reporting) Regulations 2016. Assurance necessarily gives rise to questions about the future. Customer service is set on a trajectory of improvement. Our previous assurance noted positive improvements regarding customers. Further progress is being made. But is there a steady state that is being aimed for? Are lessons being learned here that can be carried over and applied to relations with other stakeholder groups? This is the third time United Utilities has issued an integrated report. There is merit in analysing what lessons have been learnt from those three experiences and applying them to future reporting. The fact that next year s reporting must take into account The Companies, Partnerships and Groups (Accounts and Non-Financial Reporting) Regulations 2016 provide a further reason to carry out such a review. Corporate Citizenship London September 2017

Methodological notes The assurance work was commissioned in May 2017 and was completed in September 2017. Detailed records were kept of meetings, assurance visits and correspondence relating to the inclusivity, materiality and responsiveness of the report, as well as to technical matters relating to the accuracy and presentation of data. A team of three, led by a Director, undertook the assurance and commentary process. A second director acted as adviser to the group. The team has a variety of professional and technical competencies and experience. For further information please refer to our website www.corporate-citizenship.com. Our external assurance and commentary process for United Utilities Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2017 has involved, but not been limited to, the following elements: Understanding United Utilities, its business and broader business context; its approach to and understanding of corporate responsibility; how it identifies issues material to its operations and in particular how this has been shown through its strategy development and reporting; A media review of key coverage of United Utilities corporate responsibility related issues and incidents; In-depth interviews conducted with each member of the Executive Team; A detailed evaluation of United Utilities reporting against the principles of inclusivity, materiality and responsiveness; A detailed evaluation of United Utilities reporting practice against the GRI Principles for Defining Report Content and Defining Report Quality; A detailed evaluation of United Utilities reporting against The Companies, Partnerships and Groups (Accounts and Non-Financial Reporting) Regulations 2016; Testing assertions relating to Corporate Responsibility made in the United Utilities Group PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements for the year ending 31 March 2017 and the Corporate Responsibility section of the group website as at 31 July 2017. Our work did not extend to a complete audit of the report s contents. We have not been responsible for the preparation of United Utilities Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2017 nor in devising the internal management and reporting systems that yielded the data contained therein. The opinions expressed in this external assurance statement and commentary are intended to extend understanding of United Utilities non-financial performance and should not be used or relied upon to form any judgments, or take any decisions, of a financial nature.

Corporate Citizenship is a leading assuror of corporate responsibility reports and an AA1000 Licensed Assurance Provider. We have worked with United Utilities since1997 and have provided assurance since 2010. Regarding independence, during the 2016-2017 reporting period, except as noted below, our work with United Utilities focused exclusively on assurance. United Utilities is a member of the LBG (London Benchmarking Group www.lbgonline.net), an evaluation framework for corporate community involvement which we manage on behalf of its members and adherents.