AN ACOUSTIC PIPELINE TRACKING AND SURVEY SYSTEM FOR THE OFFSHORE

Similar documents
Burial Depth Determination of Cables Using Acoustics Requirements, Issues and Strategies

Three-dimensional investigation of buried structures with multi-transducer parametric sub-bottom profiler as part of hydrographical applications

Multibeam Echosounder Metadata and Quality Statistics

Teledyne Marine Acoustic Imagining

Sonar advancements for coastal and maritime surveys

KONGSBERG seafloor-mapping echosounders

PRINCIPLE OF SEISMIC SURVEY

Simrad SX90 Long range high definition sonar system

RapidScan II Application Note General Composite Scanning

Company Profile. Facilities

Side-Scan Sonar Presentation STS

Phased Array Velocity Sensor Operational Advantages and Data Analysis

SODAR- sonic detecting and ranging

global acoustic positioning system GAPS usbl acoustic with integrated INS positioning system Ixsea Oceano GAPS page 1

Broadband Temporal Coherence Results From the June 2003 Panama City Coherence Experiments

7. Consider the following common offset gather collected with GPR.

Developments in Ultrasonic Guided Wave Inspection

The World s First Triple Nested HF Radar Test Bed for Current Mapping and Ship Detection

RADAR INSPECTION OF CONCRETE, BRICK AND MASONRY STRUCTURES

UNIT 26 ELECTRONIC AIDS TO NAVIGATION

Pipeline Inspection and Environmental Monitoring Using AUVs

Ultrasound Physics. History: Ultrasound 2/13/2019. Ultrasound

CIRCULAR LAMB AND LINEAR SHEAR HORIZONTAL GUIDED WAVE ARRAYS FOR STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING

Tritech International Vehicle Sonar Developments

RELIABILITY OF GUIDED WAVE ULTRASONIC TESTING. Dr. Mark EVANS and Dr. Thomas VOGT Guided Ultrasonics Ltd. Nottingham, UK

Teledyne PDS. Monopile Placement - Laser scan position. Version March 2017

Acoustical images of the Gulf of Gdansk

6/20/2012 ACORN ACORN ACORN ACORN ACORN ACORN. Arnstein Prytz. Australian Coastal Ocean Radar Network (ACORN)

NDI Techniques Supporting Steel Pipe Products

SYSTEM 5900 SIDE SCAN SONAR

Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Navigation.

Positioning Small AUVs for Deeper Water Surveys Using Inverted USBL

Acoustics Digital, Spread Spectrum, DSP, Wideband What does this mean for Real World DP Operations? Jonathan Davis Sonardyne Inc

NEW STRATOSPHERE-TROPOSPHERE RADAR WIND PROFILER FOR NATIONAL NETWORKS AND RESEARCH

Co-Located Triangulation for Damage Position

DYNAMIC POSITIONING CONFERENCE October 7-8, Sensors I. Field Applications and Environmental Challenges in the Use of Radascan

Now add true dual channel side scan and Sub Bottom profile to your hydrographic surveys.

Estimating Fish Densities from Single Fish Echo Traces

AN AIDED NAVIGATION POST PROCESSING FILTER FOR DETAILED SEABED MAPPING UUVS

INTRODUCING AN OPERATIONAL MULTI-BEAM ARRAY SONAR

Optimal Processing of Marine High-Resolution Seismic Reflection (Chirp) Data

Progress Report. Mohammadtaghi G. Poshtmashhadi. Supervisor: Professor António M. Pascoal

Hyperbolas Graphs, Equations, and Key Characteristics of Hyperbolas Forms of Hyperbolas p. 583

High Frequency Ultrasonic Systems with Frequency Ranges of 35 to 200 MHz

MultiScan MS Tube Inspection System. Multi-technology System Eddy Current Magnetic Flux Leakage Remote Field IRIS Ultrasound

Terahertz radar imaging for standoff personnel screening

ACCURACY IMPROVEMENT ON NON-INVASIVE ULTRASONIC-DOPPLER FLOW MEASUREMENT BY UTILZING SHEAR WAVES IN METAL PIPE

Modeling of underwater sonar barriers

MultiScan MS Tube Inspection System. Multi-technology System Eddy Current Magnetic Flux Leakage Remote Field IRIS Ultrasound

High Frequency Acoustic Channel Characterization for Propagation and Ambient Noise

Research Vessel Technical Enhancement Committee (RVTEC) November 2009 Meeting ISS - Integrated Survey Systems

AIR ROUTE SURVEILLANCE 3D RADAR

BINDT Telford. Guided Wave Testing and Monitoring Over Long and Short Ranges

Radial Polarization Converter With LC Driver USER MANUAL

Pulse Doppler Flow-Dop

Easy Ultrasonic Phased Array Inspection of Corrosion - Resistant Alloys and Dissimilar Weld Materials

NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION OF CLOSED CRACKS USING AN ULTRASONIC TRANSIT TIMING METHOD J. Takatsubo 1, H. Tsuda 1, B. Wang 1

This article reports on

G Metrology System Design (AA)

Synthesis of acoustic images of underwater targets

ECC Recommendation (16)04

Ultrasound Beamforming and Image Formation. Jeremy J. Dahl

Developments in Ultrasonic Phased Array Inspection III

Prototype Software-based Receiver for Remote Sensing using Reflected GPS Signals. Dinesh Manandhar The University of Tokyo

Differences in EM Performance Between Multi-Panel Faceted and Spherical Radomes

Touchscreens, tablets and digitizers. RNDr. Róbert Bohdal, PhD.

BYU SAR: A LOW COST COMPACT SYNTHETIC APERTURE RADAR

ULTRASONIC GUIDED WAVE ANNULAR ARRAY TRANSDUCERS FOR STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING

Simulation of Ultrasonic Testing of Rail Wheel Face using Phased Array and DDF technique

Development of Under-Sodium Inspection Technique Using Ultrasonic Waveguide Sensor. FR13 4 ~ 7 Mar Paris, France

SonaFlex. Set of Portable Multifunctional Equipment for Non-contact Ultrasonic Examination of Materials

Guided Wave Travel Time Tomography for Bends

FLOW SWITCH 600 Series Velocity Flow Sensor. Instruction Manual

ZONESCAN net Version 1.4.1

Sonar Detection and Classification of Buried or Partially Buried Objects in Cluttered Environments Using UUVs

Ocean current with DopSCA

Digital Sounder: HF Diagnostics Module:Ionosonde Dual Channel ( ) Eight Channel ( )

THE USE OF VOLUME VELOCITY SOURCE IN TRANSFER MEASUREMENTS

Modern radio techniques

Sonic Distance Sensors

SPREAD SPECTRUM CHANNEL MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENT

Lecture 6 SIGNAL PROCESSING. Radar Signal Processing Dr. Aamer Iqbal Bhatti. Dr. Aamer Iqbal Bhatti

ULTRASONIC GUIDED WAVE FOCUSING BEYOND WELDS IN A PIPELINE

INTEGRATED NAVIGATION SYSTEMS

Models of Acoustic Wave Scattering at khz from Turbulence in Shallow Water

DIGITAL BEAM-FORMING ANTENNA OPTIMIZATION FOR REFLECTOR BASED SPACE DEBRIS RADAR SYSTEM

Low Frequency Bottom Reflectivity from Reflection

Active Cancellation Algorithm for Radar Cross Section Reduction

Making Noise in RF Receivers Simulate Real-World Signals with Signal Generators

A SIMPLE METHOD TO COMPARE THE SENSITIVITY OF DIFFERENT AE SENSORS FOR TANK FLOOR TESTING

Profiling River Surface Velocities and Volume Flow Estmation with Bistatic UHF RiverSonde Radar

ENHANCEMENT OF SYNTHETIC APERTURE FOCUSING TECHNIQUE (SAFT) BY ADVANCED SIGNAL PROCESSING

Kongsberg Seatex AS Pirsenteret N-7462 Trondheim Norway POSITION 303 VELOCITY 900 HEADING 910 ATTITUDE 413 HEAVE 888

USBL positioning and communication systems. Applications

ACOUSTO-ULTRASONIC EVALUATION OF HYBRID COMPOSITES USING

08/10/2013. Marine Positioning Systems Surface and Underwater Positioning. egm502 seafloor mapping

MINE SEARCH MISSION PLANNING FOR HIGH DEFINITION SONAR SYSTEM - SELECTION OF SPACE IMAGING EQUIPMENT FOR A SMALL AUV DOROTA ŁUKASZEWICZ, LECH ROWIŃSKI

Multi-Beam Echo Sounders do beam width, frequency, number of beams matter? James Williams Managing Director

ZONESCAN net Version 1.4.0

SMART LASER SENSORS SIMPLIFY TIRE AND RUBBER INSPECTION

Transcription:

AN ACOUSTIC PIPELINE TRACKING AND SURVEY SYSTEM FOR THE OFFSHORE Nico Roosnek Roosnek Research & Development Vlaskamp 92 2592 AC The Hague The Netherlands e-mail: nico@roosnek.nl Abstract: Acoustic pipeline surveys with low-frequency echo sounders are mostly done by sailing cross courses. By adding a directional element in the receiving stage a course can be sailed along the pipeline. With such a method a 100 % inspection of the pipe coverage can be obtained with reduced survey time than with cross sailing surveys with limited information about the pipe coverage. The receiving element is an array of 16 hydrophones with optimal acoustic signal processing (Kalman filtering). The position and orientation of the transmitting transducer and receiving hydrophone array are also optimal estimated using a Global Position System and a Motion Reference Unit. The technique will be presented theoretically, supported by simulation and with a play back of the raw data (20 Gbyte) from the 16 hydrophones, GPS and MRU from tests at sea. 1. INTRODUCTION In sailing a cross course the echo from the pipe shows as a hyperbola in the survey record, normally presented on screen or paper. In case of a flat sea bottom the pipe coverage is readily obtained from the survey record. The shortest distance of the hyperbola to the sea bottom reflection in the presentation is equal to the pipe coverage, see lower right sub-picture in Fig. 3. The sailing time increases with the number of cross points. When the coordinates of the reflection spot on the pipe can be obtained and presented to the surveyor in an suitable way, but also to the helmsman it will be a great asset for the total survey operation. The helmsman can then sail the ship a favorable course along the pipe and for the surveyor the precise position of the pipe in the sea bottom can be calculated. With the exact sea depth above the pipe reflection spot the coverage is obtained exactly. The requirement of a flat sea bottom is less stringent than for normal pipe surveys. In cooperation with Boskalis and Innomar a system has been simulated, built and tested. 2. THE SYSTEM Fig. 1 shows the sensor configuration of such a system. A transducer transmits a (non)linear acoustic pulse which reflects or scatters against the pipe wall. The reflections or echoes are received by the hydrophones.

Fig. 1: Ship with transmitting transducer and hydrophone array The propagation path of a low frequency acoustic pulse transmitted by an echo sounder, reflected against the pipe and received by the k th hydrophone is shown by Fig. 2. Fig. 2: Propagation path from the middle of the array to position x laying on the array. The length of the propagation path is (1) For the sake of simplicity we take the same sound velocity c for the water and the soil. The propagation time for the k th hydrophone is (2)

Note. The diameter of the pipe can be easily taken into account. We can combine all hydrophone signals S k in a cost function to be minimized by a least square method as follows, (3) where W k,l the weight of the l th sample of k th hydrophone signal is and N kl its phase function of the signal S k. The parameters to be fitted are r, " and T. The parameter T is equal to the momentary or mean radial frequency of the signal and thus may be omitted from the fit procedure. Since small changes occur in r, " and T, the cost function can be linearized as follows (4) The parameters are found by varying )r, )" and eventually )T. The reflection spot is on a cone described by the direction vector The estimated angle and distance are subsequently used to estimate the offset vector and eventually direction vector of the pipe. A circle on a cone is obtained on which the reflection spot is located. Since the echo is perpendicular to the pipe direction, the angle ( and thus the coordinates of the reflection spot are calculated with the error and transformed into world coordinates. Summarized: the history, system and observations with their errors are taken into account to estimate the new pipe position leading to a Kalman filter procedure. More or less the same applies for an unknown pipe direction vector. 3. SIMULATION Fig. 3 shows the monitor screen with the pipe and soil simulated and a signal to noise ratio (S/N) of 10 db. The upper left sub-picture shows the 16 hydrophone signals of the present record. The sea bottom echo is shown by the equal time black responses in the hydrophone signals. The echo of the pipe is shown by the green lines. The lower left sub-picture shows the navigation screen. The red line is the pipe position. The zig-zag line and the arrow show the simulated sailed course of the ship, respectively the present position and orientation towards the pipeline. Every point of the line corresponds with one record of the upper left sub-picture. The transmission rate is 25 Hz. The lower right sub-picture shows the acoustic record in false colors. This record corresponds with normal survey records. Clearly is shown the hyperbolic curves of the acoustic echoes from the pipe in the sea bottom. The middle lower sub-picture shows the spectrum of the present record. The moment of the green arrow corresponds with the displayed spectrum and with the small hyphen on the line between the spectrum record and the survey record. At the upper right in Fig. 3 numbers are produced for testing and operational purposes. (5)

Fig. 3: Screen dump of the monitor display of a simulation with a S/N of 10 db. See text. 4. A REAL TEST The hardware is based on a personal computer (pc) with a 2500 MHz Celeron processor with an AD-DA card of Realtime Devices. Transmission rates up to 30 Hz with all realtime graphics, like Fig. 4, are possible. The nonlinear echo sounder SES-96 of Innomar was used as transmitter. The receiving hardware consisted of an array of 16 hydrophones and a filter bank, also supplied by Innomar. The system is programmed in the C language under 32-bit DOS control with direct graphics control and has a simulation, realtime and play-back mode. For the play-back mode a log mode is incorporated. The position information, based on a Motion Reference Unit (MRU) and a Global Position System (GPS), is estimated by the Kalman procedure in the pc-system. The logged data are all raw data from the hydrophones, the MRU, the GPS and the intermediate results of the signal-processing. Logging is done in realtime and eventually in simulation mode. Since nonlinear echo-sounder transmitters have a small transmitting aperture, and in this case steering of the beam is possible an estimate for the transmission angle was supplied to the echo-sounder by the pc-system. Also information about the moment of transmission and type of pulse was exchanged via links between the transmitter and the pc-system. The Eemszinker pipe, located in the Wadden sea, near the Dutch city Delfzijl, was used in the test in 2003. The pipe diameter is 47 inches. The weather and sea conditions were calm.

The pipe position was determined, as a reference and for test purposes, in the classic way, by sailing a cross course. One record was made with a large GPS aerial offset relative to the transmitting transducer and a second record without an horizontal offset. Fig. 4 shows a screen dump of the monitor display of the realtime operation. A navigation sub-picture has been added at the lower right and a compass card at the top right. The survey sub-picture shows no noticeable swell. Fig. 4: Screen dump of the monitor display The upper part of Fig. 5 shows the geophysical record and the lower part shows information about the horizontal positions of some variables. The real pipe position in the bottom is drawn heavily black in the geophysical record and red in the position record. Clearly is shown the pipe coverage. In the position record the position of the ship is shown by the green line.

Fig. 5: A geophysical and position record. The sailing directions is westwards (to the left) The geophysical record is created without the use of any steering information. The lines/dots in both records have the following meaning: - green line # position of the transducer/array, estimated form the GPS and MRU data - green/blue line # position of the tranducer/array without GPS data for at least the last 10 seconds - blue line # position according logged distance r and sin(") or transmission angle of SES system - light reddots # estimated pipe position, according estimated distance r and sin(") - red line # estimated pipe position, according updated pipe vector after using estimated sin(") - thin black lines # pipe position according the two Innomar records - thick black line # estimated real depth of pipe In Fig. 6 the sailing course deviates largely from the pipe position, contrary to the course shown in fig. 5. The measured pipe positions of Figures 5 and 6 correspond rather well. At the detection stage varies the correspondence. The position of the pipe from just the geophysical record is difficult to extract. At the start and also at the end no trace is seen.

Fig. 6: A geophysical record and position record with a sailing course (green line) not parallel with the pipe. The sailing direction is eastward (to the right). Although the wrong transmission angle is given to the transmitter during the test, it has hardly any effect on the reception, the signal-processing. The detection and tracking is rather well. 5. CONCLUSION Already in 1980 a pipe survey system with directivity was envisaged, designed and simulated, based on charge bucket devices. No proven hardware was available at that time. The proven hardware and signal processing technology nowadays make the construction of a low cost pipe survey system possible. Simulation showed that such a system works correctly. Also the test carried out on the Delfzijl Eemszinker shows that the system works correctly, clearly pictured by Figures 5 and 6. The SES-96 system was used as a transmitter. The pcsystem can also transmit low frequency (~10kHz) chirps with a large aperture, enhancing the capture range of the system and adding a very low chirp subbottom profiling option together with the tracking of pipes.

6. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author thanks Boskalis Westminster Dredging for the close support in the development and tests of this project. REFERENCES [1] N. Roosnek, Multibeam subbottom profiler, internal report, 92 pages, 1980 [2] A.P. Sage, J.L. Melsa, ESTIMATION THEORY with Applications to Communications and Control, McGraw-Hill Book Company, 500 pages, 1971