GNSS Technologies. PPP and RTK

Similar documents
GNSS Technologies. PPP and RTK

Precise Positioning with NovAtel CORRECT Including Performance Analysis

Guochang Xu GPS. Theory, Algorithms and Applications. Second Edition. With 59 Figures. Sprin ger

RTCM State Space Representation (SSR) Overall Concepts Towards PPP-RTK

Trimble Business Center:

GNSS OBSERVABLES. João F. Galera Monico - UNESP Tuesday 12 Sep

Introduction to GNSS Base-Station

GPS for crustal deformation studies. May 7, 2009

ION GNSS 2011 FILLING IN THE GAPS OF RTK WITH REGIONAL PPP

Bernese GPS Software 4.2

One Source for Positioning Success

Global Correction Services for GNSS

Modelling GPS Observables for Time Transfer

Integer Ambiguity Resolution for Precise Point Positioning Patrick Henkel

GPS STATIC-PPP POSITIONING ACCURACY VARIATION WITH OBSERVATION RECORDING INTERVAL FOR HYDROGRAPHIC APPLICATIONS (ASWAN, EGYPT)

Generation of Consistent GNSS SSR Corrections

Geodetic Reference via Precise Point Positioning - RTK

Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 19

PPP with Ambiguity Resolution (AR) using RTCM-SSR

Some of the proposed GALILEO and modernized GPS frequencies.

Table of Contents. Frequently Used Abbreviation... xvii

Jun CHEN. Differential GNSS positioning with low-cost receivers. Background. Objective: Methods:

On the GNSS integer ambiguity success rate

FieldGenius Technical Notes GPS Terminology

Multisystem Real Time Precise-Point-Positioning, today with GPS+GLONASS in the near future also with QZSS, Galileo, Compass, IRNSS

Chapter 6 GPS Relative Positioning Determination Concepts

Precise Point Positioning (PPP) using

Global Positioning System: what it is and how we use it for measuring the earth s movement. May 5, 2009

GNSS & Coordinate Systems

Comparative analysis of GNSS Real Time Kinematic methods for navigation

Foreword by Glen Gibbons About this book Acknowledgments List of abbreviations and acronyms List of definitions

Study and analysis of Differential GNSS and Precise Point Positioning

Precise Positioning GNSS Applications

UNIT 1 - introduction to GPS

Phase Center Calibration and Multipath Test Results of a Digital Beam-Steered Antenna Array

Presented at the FIG Congress 2018, May 6-11, 2018 in Istanbul, Turkey

ProMark 3 RTK. White Paper

Asian Journal of Science and Technology Vol. 08, Issue, 11, pp , November, 2017 RESEARCH ARTICLE

UCGE Reports Number 20054

Space Weather influence on satellite based navigation and precise positioning

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 6, Issue 8, August ISSN

CHAPTER 2 GPS GEODESY. Estelar. The science of geodesy is concerned with the earth by quantitatively

Innovation: Instantaneous centimeter-level multi-frequency precise point positioning

Deliverable : OUT230-1 Written by : G. Wautelet, S. Lejeune, S. Stankov, H. Brenot, R. Warnant GALOCAD

DECIMETER LEVEL MAPPING USING DIFFERENTIAL PHASE MEASUREMENTS OF GPS HANDHELD RECEIVERS

Broadcast Ionospheric Model Accuracy and the Effect of Neglecting Ionospheric Effects on C/A Code Measurements on a 500 km Baseline

Positioning Techniques. João F. Galera Monico - UNESP Tuesday 12 Sep

COMPARISON OF GPS COMMERCIAL SOFTWARE PACKAGES TO PROCESSING STATIC BASELINES UP TO 30 KM

ProMark 500 White Paper

Wednesday AM: (Doug) 2. PS and Long Period Signals

The Global Positioning System

Precise GNSS Positioning for Mass-market Applications

GPS for. Land Surveyors. Jan Van Sickle. Fourth Edition. CRC Press. Taylor & Francis Group. Taylor & Francis Croup, an Informa business

Assessment of the Accuracy of Processing GPS Static Baselines Up To 40 Km Using Single and Dual Frequency GPS Receivers.

International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 7, Issue 12, December-2016

Bernhard Hofnlann-Wellenhof Herbert Lichtenegger Elmar Wasle. GNSS - Global Navigation Satellite Systenls. GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, and nl0re

GPS Milestones, cont. GPS Milestones. The Global Positioning Sytem, Part 1 10/10/2017. M. Helper, GEO 327G/386G, UT Austin 1. US GPS Facts of Note

Effect of Quasi Zenith Satellite (QZS) on GPS Positioning

Introduction to GNSS

Performance Evaluation of Differential Global Navigation Satellite System with RTK Corrections

ENGI 3703 Surveying and Geomatics

SSR Technology for Scalable Real-Time GNSS Applications

Digital Land Surveying and Mapping (DLS and M) Dr. Jayanta Kumar Ghosh Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee

Evaluation of Multi-Constellation GNSS Precise Point Positioning (PPP) Techniques in Egypt

WHITE PAPER ABSTARCT. The new Quantum TM Algorithm by ComNav Technology July 2016

GPS and Recent Alternatives for Localisation. Dr. Thierry Peynot Australian Centre for Field Robotics The University of Sydney

Sub-daily signals in GPS. at semi-annual and annual periods

Application of GNSS Methods for Monitoring Offshore Platform Deformation

Applications, Products and Services of GPS Technology

GNSS Ionosphere Analysis at CODE

Introduction to DGNSS

Introduction to GNSS

PRINCIPLES AND FUNCTIONING OF GPS/ DGPS /ETS ER A. K. ATABUDHI, ORSAC

GPS Position Estimation Using Integer Ambiguity Free Carrier Phase Measurements

GNSS Modernisation and Its Effect on Surveying. Short range GNSS phase-based positioning is limited by multipath

THE INFLUENCE OF ZENITH TROPOSPHERIC DELAY ON PPP-RTK. S. Nistor a, *, A.S. Buda a,

VARIATION OF STATIC-PPP POSITIONING ACCURACY USING GPS-SINGLE FREQUENCY OBSERVATIONS (ASWAN, EGYPT)

PDHonline Course L105 (12 PDH) GPS Surveying. Instructor: Jan Van Sickle, P.L.S. PDH Online PDH Center

Procedures for Quality Control of GNSS Surveying Results Based on Network RTK Corrections.

Cycle Slip Detection in Galileo Widelane Signals Tracking

Performance of Research-Based N-RTK Positioning System in ISKANDAR Malaysia

REAL-TIME ESTIMATION OF IONOSPHERIC DELAY USING DUAL FREQUENCY GPS OBSERVATIONS

Journal of Global Positioning Systems

Integrity of Satellite Navigation in the Arctic

Satellite Navigation Integrity and integer ambiguity resolution

Fundamentals of GPS for high-precision geodesy

GNSS analysis software GSILIB for utilizing Multi- GNSS data

Utilizing A GNSS Network Solution for Utility Applications

Is neo-cadastral surveying on your smartphone feasible?

RTCM-SSR Strategy of Bias Treatment

The International Scene: How Precise Positioning Will Underpin Critical GNSS Applications

Automated Quality Control of Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) Data

Tajul Ariffin Musa. Tajul A. Musa. Dept. of Geomatics Eng, FKSG, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Johor, MALAYSIA.

Kalman Filter Based Integer Ambiguity. Ionosphere and Troposphere Estimation

Performances of Modernized GPS and Galileo in Relative Positioning with weighted ionosphere Delays

Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 20" Processing Software" Primary research programs"

Ultra-wideband Radio Aided Carrier Phase Ambiguity Resolution in Real-Time Kinematic GPS Relative Positioning. Eric Broshears

REAL-TIME GPS ATTITUDE DETERMINATION SYSTEM BASED ON EPOCH-BY-EPOCH TECHNOLOGY

Multi-Constellation GNSS Precise Point Positioning using GPS, GLONASS and BeiDou in Australia

EXPERIMENTAL ONE AXIS ATTITUDE DETERMINATION USING GPS CARRIER PHASE MEASUREMENTS

Transcription:

PPP and RTK 29.02.2016

Content Carrier phase based positioning PPP RTK VRS Slides based on: GNSS Applications and Methods, by S. Gleason and D. Gebre-Egziabher (Eds.), Artech House Inc., 2009 http://www.gnssapplications.org/ and P. Misra, P. Enge, Global Positioning System; Signals, Measurements, and Performance, 2006 And University of New South Wales, Principles and Practice of GPS Surveying http://www.sage.unsw.edu.au/snap/gps/gps_survey/principles_gps.htm 2

Definitions Receiver position is actually the position of the antenna electrical phase center Antennas. (2014, January 28). Navipedia,. Retrieved 08:05, March 9, 2014 from http://www.navipedia.net/index.php?title=a ntennas&oldid=12573. Precision and accuracy Precise but not accurate Accurate but not precise Accurate and precise 3

Precise positioning (1) For many applications the accuracy obtained using code phase measurements (meter level) is not enough, therefore carrier phase measurements have to be used (accuracy on centimeter level) Applications such as Agriculture Intelligent transportation (lane detection, collision warning) Position based paring applications Road maintenance Land surveying Construction 4

Precise positioning (2) GPS was designed to compute the PVT using code phase measurements Code and carrier measurements are corrupted with same error sources Code tracing measurements are coarse but unambiguous Carrier phase measurements are precise but ambiguous Source: P. Misra, P. Enge, Global Positioning System; Signals, Measurements, and Performance, 2006, 569 s. 5

Carrier phase based positioning (1) Precise positioning using carrier phase measurements provides positioning accuracy on the order of millimeters to decimeters, which is a great improvement over the code phase solution The difficulty in performing a carrier phase based pseudorange measurement primarily lies in the challenge of a quic and robust determination of the carrier cycle ambiguity N for each satellite traced This ambiguity is conceptually equal to the exact number of carriers contained in the space between the receiver and the satellite at the initial signal loc Measurement errors mae it very difficult to determine N in real time and therefore sophisticated means has to be used 6

Carrier phase based positioning (2) (x s, y s, z s ) 2 Carrier phase measurement is a measure of the range between a satellite and a receiver expressed in units of cycles of the carrier frequency. Carrier phase observation in unit of length: L = lf = r+ Nl Known satellite locations at time t: (x s, y s, z s ) t Carrier wave length: l User location (x r, y r, z r ) User time difference from GPS time dt r Unnown initial number of phases N 7 1) When a satellite is loced, the GPS receiver starts tracing the incoming phase 2) It counts the (real) number of phases as a function of time = Δϕ(t) 3) The initial number of phases N is unnown 4) However, if no loss of loc, N is constant over an orbit arc (x s, y s, z s ) 0 Df 1 (x s, y s, z s ) 1 Df 2 (x r, y r, z r )

Carrier phase based positioning (3) Carrier phase positioning is performed in a differential mode (relative positioning with respect to a base station) The process of estimating and validating the correct estimate of the integers is a time consuming process E.g. a typical method: the LAMBDA If the receiver maes a sudden move and the carrier phase loc is lost, even for an instant, the count is broen and the ambiguity must be recalculated 8

Carrier phase based positioning (4) Carrier phase based positioning is a differential (and relative) technique to achieve centimetrer level accuracy by using carrier phases of the underlying GNSS carrier wave signals One receiver (or more) is located at a point of nown coordinates (the base stations or reference receiver) and the other receiver is operated by the user If the baseline between the GNSS receivers is more than around 5-20 ilometers, both L1 and L2 frequencies are used to correct for the ionospheric delay For shorter baselines, dual-frequency measurements are still necessary for rapid initialization for cm-level positioning 9

Carrier phase based positioning (5) Current high-accuracy GNSS positioning techniques 10

Mathematical models Pseudorange measurements are used for low accuracy single-point or absolute positioning OR in combination with carrier phase measurements Carrier phase is defined as the difference between the phase of the incoming carrier signal and the phase of the reference signal generated by the receiver 11 u T I t t c r 1 1 1 ] [ u T I t t c r 2 2 2 ] [ on L1 on L2 u u N T I t t c r 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1,, ( ] [ l l u u N T I t t c r 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 2 2,, ( ] [ l l on L1 on L2 Initial fractional phases at the satellite and the receiver

Differencing (1/2) New observables may be obtained via differencing to remove systematic error sources Between-receiver differencing, between-satellite differencing, between-epoch differencing, between frequencies An error of 10 cm in the measurements could correspond to a change of one cycle in the integer ambiguity estimate (L1 wavelength 19 cm) Also errors have to be in centimeter level to be able to get a position accuracy on centimeter level Primary differencing options: Single-differencing mode Double-differencing mode Triple-differencing mode 12

Differencing (2/2) The single-differenced observable (between-receiver) is obtained by differencing two observables to satellite traced simultaneously by two receivers i (reference) and j i, j i j The double-differenced observable is obtained by differencing observables from two receivers i and j observing the same two satellites and l (or differencing two single differences to satellites and l), l l l l i, j ( i j ) ( i j ) i, j i, j Differencing two double-differences separated by a time interval dt generates a triple-differenced observable, l, l, l i, j j j t ( dt) i, ( t2) i, ( 1) 13

Differencing modes and their error characteristics Triple-difference: Assuming no cycle slips, or loss of loc has occurred, this eliminates the integer ambiguity, hence used to detect for cycle slips and loss of loc 14

Single-difference between-receiver Satellite clocs are extremely accurate but still have errors too large to ignore Eliminates satellite bias and drift Single-differencing and DGNSS have a subtle difference: differential corrections vary slowly, but in single-differencing actual measurements at reference station are used and has to be extrapolated 15

The double-difference From two single differences Basic GNSS observable Ambiguity still to be estimated Highest satellite usually the reference because it has smallest propagation and multipath errors 16

The triple-difference From two double differences Eliminates the ambiguity term Very noisy Useful for approximating baseline solutions 17

Ambiguity resolution techniques (1) Carrier-phase integer ambiguity resolution (N) and validation can be solved via Ambiguity resolution in the measurement domain: Code measurements are used for integer ambiguity resolution Dual-frequency double-difference Requires long periods of clean data 18 l l 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 L L L L L L L L N N r

Ambiguity resolution techniques (2) Search technique in the coordinate domain Uses only fractional part of the carrier-phase measurement Poor computational efficiency => not really used Search techniques in the ambiguity domain Most used and accurate The process will be explained in more detail later related to baseline determination 19

Between-receiver double-differencing l ij,1 r l ij l N 1 l ij,1 l ij,1 l ij,2 r l ij l N 2 l ij,2 l ij,2 Widelane observable l l ij, 1 ij, 2 Narrowlane observable l l ij, 1 ij, 2 20

Combination of L1 and L2 phases (1) Uncertainty in integer estimation depends on the carrier wavelength GPS L1: 0.190 m, L2: 0.244m => not much better Wide-lane measurement has the wavelength of f f f L12 L1 L2 Integer ambiguity easier to be resolved Measurements noisier than L1 or L2 Narrow-lane measurement f Ln f f L1 L2 has the wavelength of Less noisier than wide-lane ll c /( f f 2) 0. 862 12 L1 L lln 0. 107m m 21

Combination of L1 and L2 phases (2) 22

Combination of L1 and L2 phases (3) The ionospheric free wavelength can be useful on longer baselines where atmospheric errors cannot be neglected The widelane wavelength is about four times the magnitude of the GPS L1 signal: therefore, the number of double difference integer ambiguity candidate points in the search space decreases quicer to fix The widelane observable noise is about six times larger in magnitude than L1 noise, whereas narrow-lane noise is actually reduced to approximately 0.7 times the L1 noise To obtain best position estimates, the widelane solution should only be used as intermediate step to fix either the L1-only or narrow-lane integer ambiguities 23

Dealing with ionospheric delay Ionosphere-free phase Linear Combination LC can be defined as 2 r f1 f1 f2 LC f1 N 2 2 1 N 2 2 2 c f f f f 1 2 1 2 Note: Ambiguity terms are no longer integers due to the multiplicators ambiguity fixing is not an option with LC Noise is scaled up General approach Adopting LC for baselines >~10m First ambiguities fixed using e.g. wide-lane approach and then final solution using LC 24

Ambiguity resolution A comprehensive review of ambiguity resolution methods can be found at http:\\gauss.gge.unb.ca/papers.pdf/gnss2000.im.pdf One of the most commonly used ambiguity resolution method is the LAMBDA sequential conditional least-squares estimation preceded by a decorrelation of the ambiguities by which the integer least-squares estimates can be computed very fast and efficiently 25

Baseline determination The basic steps in baseline determination in carrier phase processing Define a priori values to ambiguity parameters Use a search algorithm to identify liely integer values for the ambiguities Employ a decision-maing algorithm to select the best set of integer values Apply a validation test to the integer ambiguities Obtain the unambiguous double-differenced range observable R ( N )l Compute the baseline parameters between the receiver and the reference station using the precise range observables user receiver coordinates (x,y,z) 26

Reliability of ambiguity resolution Ambiguity resolution reliability is a function of Baseline length between receiver and reference Number of satellites Satellite geometry (satellites setting or rising during the measurement session) Multipath disturbance Single or dual-frequency in use Length of observation session If a carrier cycle slip occurs, the carrier phase ambiguities have to be reinitialized 27

ADOP The precision of the ambiguity estimate can be approximated by a quantity called ambiguity dilution of precision (ADOP) Analogously to the traditional DOP, the idea is to measure the mutual correlation and precision of the double differences ADOP det(p) where P is the covariance matrix of the double differences ADOP can be used e.g. to determine whether it is worthwhile to even try to resolve the integer ambiguities 28

Remars Inter-receiver distances can be from ilometers to thousands of ilometers If long observation sessions are used (up to 24 hours), the integer ambiguities are not necessary to be fixed All data typically archived in RINEX and post-processed Scientific software pacages available include (e.g.) GAMIT/GLOBK (from MIT) Bernese (from University of Bern) Static mode is most commonly used in carrier phase based processing, unless real-time inematic positioning is concerned A priori satellite orbits are usually obtained from IGS http://www.igs.org/ 29

RTK Real Time Kinematic (RTK) is a technique relying on a single reference station to provide real-time corrections, providing up to centimetre-level accuracy with carrier phase measurements The base station re-broadcasts the phase of the carrier that it measured to the user receiver, and the mobile unit compares its own carrier phase measurements with the ones received from the base station The Virtual Reference Station (VRS) method extends the use of RTK to a whole area of a reference station networ Operational reliability and the accuracies to be achieved depend on the density and capabilities of the reference station networ, using dual-frequency receivers the distance should be maximum of 50 m A Continuously Operating Reference Station (CORS) networ is a networ of RTK base stations that broadcast corrections, usually over an internet connection 30

Multiple reference station RTK Independent reference receivers: Networ not efficient, of reference too many base stations stations and correction modelling 31

The VRS principle (1) Ref. station Virtual ref. station (VRS) 32

The VRS principle (2) Networ-RTK is operated in the same way as traditional RTK, but a mobile reference receiver is replaced by a virtual reference station (VRS) The reference data from the VRS are based on the nearest physical stations Ref. station Virtual ref. station (VRS) GNSS rover 33

PPP overview (1) Precise point positioning (PPP) cm-position accuracy of a single static receiver using long observation series and sub-meter accuracy with a moving receiver using ionospheric-free pseudorange and carrier phase functions single receiver easy to deploy & cost effective focus on carrier phase measurements the most accurate observables precise satellite orbit and cloc products Ionosphere is the dominant source of error dual-frequency users taes advantage of the ionosphere-free (IF) observations (P3,L3) single-frequency-only users some mitigation process is required 34

PPP overview (2) Form the ionosphere-free carrier phase measurement using dual-frequency I r ct r Tz m( el) li NI Four unnowns receiver cloc tr, changes from epoch to epoch troposphere path delay Tz, changes slowly NI (not integer anymore), doesn t change if the loc is not lost User position (x,y,z) The converge time of solution depends on satellites in view and geometry, user dynamics and quality of measurements In static case position estimation is easy, will converge in 15-30 minutes 35

PPP - Observation errors (1) GNSS observables ( = pseudoranges and carrier phases) contain errors The main errors are, in order of significance: Ionosphere (~5 m typical) Satellite Orbit and Cloc (~4 m) Troposphere (~2.5 m) Signal biases (carrier and code) (~1 m) Phase wind up effects (~ 20 cm) Earth tides (~ 10 cm) Polar tides and ocean loading (~ cm) 36

PPP Observation error (2) Correcting for the errors mentioned on the previous slide is the ey What to correct for depends on requirements => what accuracy is needed We need a source to get these corrections from Sources can be: GNSS SBAS Local networs National networs such as FinnRef http://euref-fin.fgi.fi/fgi/en/positioning-service/use-service 37

Double Differences vs. PPP Similar precision possible in 24 h solutions Software Only few software capable of geodetic PPP (GIPSY mainly) GAMIT is using double differencing PPP requires extra care modelling geophysical phenomena (e.g., ocean tide loading displacements) which may be (partially) differenced in relative analysis orbit/cloc errors (some periodic) map 1:1 into positioning Kinematic PPP requires longer periods of data ambiguity fixing is not possible without a double differenced second step Double differencing is more precise when short-baseline relative motion is all that is required (e.g., glacier monitoring), but depends on the base station 38

Accuracy considerations The receiver antenna also has an effect on the carrier phase positioning quality Consumer-grade receivers use simple patch antennas whereas geodetic-grade receivers are equipped with choe ring antennas Choe ring antennas are more resistant to multipath as they can better reject signals coming from below the horizon Naturally the receiver s sensitivity and ability to maintain phase loc affect carrier phase positioning performance Frequent cycle slips are hazardous for carrier phase positioning Only the satellites traced by both the reference and rover receivers can be used in differential positioning, so the receiver should be able to acquire and trac as many satellites as possible 39

Other systems in carrier phase processing GLONASS measurements can be used when computing the float solution to improve the convergence speed but usually they are omitted from the fixed solution and integer ambiguity resolution GALILEO is better suited for carrier phase differential positioning than GLONASS Using other systems beside GPS will bring not only more frequencies but also a more extensive satellite constellation to use, thus speeding up the ambiguity resolution process GPS L5 => extrawide-laning 40