TETRA and Critical Communications Association (TCCA) response to Ofcom 700 MHz consultation

Similar documents
TCCA PMR Spectrum position

PPDR needs for dedicated harmonized spectrum for high speed data usage TETRA ASSOCIATION

ITU WRC-15 summary Slide title 70 pt CAPITALS Slide subtitle minimum 30 pt

The road to future critical LTE

Eur Ing Laurent Bodusseau BEng(Hons) CEng MIET FM49 Chairman, ANFR - France Riding the (RADIO)waves of change Bucharest, September 26th, 2016

RESOLUTION 646 (REV.WRC-15) Public protection and disaster relief

PPDR with new Regulation

RADIO SPECTRUM POLICY GROUP. Commission activities related to radio spectrum policy

Approved 09 December 2011

Critical Communications State of the Play

Huawei response to the Ofcom consultation on Future use of the 700MHz band

Tor Helge Lyngstøl Director, the Directorate for Emergency Communication, Norway. ETSI, Sophia Antipolis September 29th 2016.

BANZINET RESPONSE TO: DRAFT FREQUENCY MIGRATION REGULATION AND FREQUENCY MIGRATION PLAN AUGUST 2012

An Introduction by. Motorola Solutions India. Bharat Bhatia

Spectrum Release Plan

Spectrum opportunity cost calculations in parts of VHF Band I

Brussels, 19 May 2011 COUNCIL THE EUROPEAN UNION 10301/11 TELECOM 72 AUDIO 15 TRANS 148 AVIATION 142 ESPACE 31 MI 265 COMPET 194 RECH 118 ENV 369

Deregulating Futures: The role of spectrum

RADIO SPECTRUM POLICY GROUP. Opinion on Spectrum Aspects of Intelligent Transport Systems

INDEPENDENT REVIEW SAYS UK ON TRACK TO BE A LEADING INTERNET ECONOMY

Consultation on the licensing of spectrum in the 800 MHz and 900 MHz bands

ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS COMMITTEE

Canada Voice Communications Plan (The Way Forward)

Notice No. SMBR : DTV (Digital Television) Transition Allotment Plan

Variation of UK Broadband s spectrum access licence for 3.6 GHz spectrum

Spectrum for audio PMSE. Use of the 694 to 703 MHz band

CEPT has conducted a number of studies and has produced a number of deliverables related to the use of MFCN in the 1400 MHz band, as listed below.

2. Summary of Main Points 2.1. An enhanced Airwave (or some alternative national system) is vital to public safety and will remain so in future.

Development of Frequency band for Public Protection & Disaster Relief (PPDR)/ Disaster Management in Bangladesh

Thuraya response to Federal Office of Communications consultation

Radio - Spectrum and Licensing Policy for VHF Band III, Sub-band 3

Question 1: Do you have any comments on our approach to this review?:

4 Consultation question

Urban WiMAX response to Ofcom s Spectrum Commons Classes for licence exemption consultation

IR UK Interface Requirement 2098

UHF Radiomicrophones:

Spectrum Management Policy for Mobile Broadband Promotion in Serbia Katarina Tomić

THE EUROPEAN TABLE OF FREQUENCY ALLOCATIONS AND APPLICATIONS IN THE FREQUENCY RANGE 9 khz to 3000 GHz (ECA TABLE)

Ulwimo ULtimate WIreless MObility

L-Band: The 1500 MHz IMT Range

New directions for the radio spectrum: Towards a spectrum commons and shared use

RADIO SPECTRUM COMMITTEE

Consultation Paper on Public Safety Radio Interoperability Guidelines

Mr. Marc Dupuis Director General, Engineering, Planning and Standards Branch Industry Canada 19 th Floor, 300 Slater Street Ottawa ON K1A 0C8

Frequency Band Review for Fixed Wireless Service

ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS COMMITTEE

THE EUROPEAN TABLE OF FREQUENCY ALLOCATIONS AND APPLICATIONS IN THE FREQUENCY RANGE 8.3 khz to 3000 GHz (ECA TABLE)

Decision to make the Wireless Telegraphy (Vehicle Based Intelligent Transport Systems)(Exemption) Regulations 2009

DE COSSON, CYPRIEN.

RADIO SPECTRUM COMMITTEE

Spectrum Allocation and Utilization Policy Regarding the Use of Certain Frequency Bands Below 1.7 GHz for a Range of Radio Applications

Airwave Service Business Benefits Summary

Official Journal of the European Union DECISIONS

THE EUROPEAN TABLE OF FREQUENCY ALLOCATIONS AND APPLICATIONS IN THE FREQUENCY RANGE 8.3 khz to 3000 GHz (ECA TABLE)

ECC Report 276. Thresholds for the coordination of CDMA and LTE broadband systems in the 400 MHz band

Exploiting the digital dividend a European approach: overview of the study for the European Commission

Radio Technology Overview. January 2011

Authorisation of terrestrial mobile networks complementary to 2 GHz Mobile Satellite Service (MSS)

Policing in the 21 st Century. Response from the Royal Academy of Engineering to the Home Affairs Select Committee

Response to Ofcom s Consultation on Administrative Incentive Pricing

UK Interface Requirement 2006

REGULATORY IMPLICATIONS OF USING SPECTRUM BELOW 800 MHZ

SOLUTIONS Paper Wi4 Fixed: Point-to-Point Wireless Broadband Solutions. Point-to-Point Connectivity in the 4.9 GHz Public Safety Band

From FM to DAB+ Final Report of the Digital Migration Working Group. Annex to the press release of the 1 st December 2014

Kordia Submission on Preparing for 5G in New Zealand. 8 May 2018

ECC Strategic Plan. ECC Strategic Plan for the period

Update on 5G spectrum

APT RECOMMENDATION USE OF THE BAND MHZ FOR PUBLIC PROTECTION AND DISASTER RELIEF (PPDR) APPLICATIONS

RESPONSE TO THE HOUSE OF COMMONS TRANSPORT SELECT COMMITTEE INQUIRY INTO GALILEO. Memorandum submitted by The Royal Academy of Engineering

Implementation of LSA in the GHz band

December Eucomed HTA Position Paper UK support from ABHI

Improving consumer access to mobile services at 3.6GHz to 3.8GHz

APCO Technology Forum THE CONVERGENCE OF WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS IN PUBLIC SAFETY. Andrew M. Seybold

Council of the European Union Brussels, 29 May 2015 (OR. en) Mr Uwe CORSEPIUS, Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union

Flexible use of spectrum

Your response. Our case is set out in the attachment below:

IR UK Interface Requirement 2097

Glossary of Terms Black Sky Event: Blue Sky Operations: Federal Communications Commission (FCC): Grey Sky Operations:

Electronic Communications Committee (ECC) within the European Conference of Postal and Telecommunications Administrations (CEPT)

A Vision for the Future

Report approved on 01 March 2016 by the ECC

Recognised Spectrum Access (RSA) for Receive Only Earth Stations Statement on the making of regulations to introduce RSA in the frequency bands 7850

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC ) ) ) ) ) ) COMMENTS OF THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION

Radio Spectrum Considerations for Present and Future Rail Communication Systems in the CEPT / Electronic Communications Committee (ECC)

Frequency arrangements for public protection and disaster relief radiocommunication systems in accordance with Resolution 646 (Rev.

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Spectrum policy and mobile multimedia an initial UK view

Policy guidance regarding authorisation for Earth Stations on Vessels (ESVs)

Rulemaking Hearing Rules of the Tennessee Department of Health Bureau of Health Licensure and Regulation Division of Emergency Medical Services

A review of the role and costs of clinical commissioning groups

The General Data Protection Regulation

Airwave Service Government Security Classifications Guidance

The NHS England Assurance Framework: national report for consultation Chief Officer, Barnet Clinical Commissioning Group

Next Generation Public Safety and Emergency Technologies

Economic benefits from making the GHz band available for mobile broadband services in Western Europe. Report for the GSM Association

UMTS Forum key messages for WRC 2007

IMT issues for WRC-15: Looking for Spectrum

Policies and Strategies to Optimise the Use of the RF Spectrum

14 November 2013, DTU, Denmark

Kordia Submission on VHF Band III Spectrum Allocation. 27 May 2016

Transcription:

TETRA + Critical Communications Association 14 Blandford Square Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4HZ UK Tel: +44 191 231 4328 Fax: +44 191 245 3802 5th July 2013 Dear Sirs, TETRA and Critical Communications Association (TCCA) response to Ofcom 700 MHz consultation The consultation above has identified the following key questions to which we are responding. The TCCA will constrain its responses to be relevant for the Public Protection and Disaster Relief (PPDR) sector and its forthcoming use of 700 MHz spectrum in the UK. Question 1: Have we correctly identified and characterised the potential costs set out above, and what other costs if any should be taken into account in our assessment? The overall cost to society from not having an efficient and always-available public safety radio communication service in place taking into account both direct and indirect impacts on human lives, health, property etc would become huge. We invite Ofcom to consider the total socio-economic costs versus the corresponding savings achieved by enabling a stateof-the-art PPDR communication solution that can effectively support broadband data communication under any circumstances. PPDR users have specific needs that ordinary commercial operators will never be able to meet under their business plans. Those needs cover specific functionalities and specific engineering implementations to ensure robustness, security and availability. We strongly believe that those needs are ultimately best met by implementing a dedicated radio network in a dedicated spectrum allocation, in line with the current PPDR narrow band implementations in the UK. Should the PPDR agencies not be granted the opportunity for a dedicated and protected radio system, but are instead forced to share a mobile network with commercial subscribers, then compliance with the specific PPDR requirements must be assured by defining PPDR specific rules within any auction of the frequencies in question. Registered Office, Richmond House, Broad Street Ely, Cambridgeshire, CB7 4AH, UK Registration No.4155039 in UK VAT Registration Number GB 755 4236 24

Referring to our response to Ofcom s UHF spectrum consultation in June 2012, the anticipated mobile service allocation in the 700 MHz band is likely to be the last good opportunity to meet the PPDR broadband spectrum needs in one single allocation. Due to the coverage limitations of higher frequency bands, it will not be possible to meet the PPDR specific functionality and availability needs at an affordable cost once all spectrum below 1 GHz has been auctioned off. This will lead to a situation where PPDR effectively cannot deliver the required service to society. Question 2: What evidence, whether qualitative or quantitative, should we obtain and/or take into account in assessing each of these potential costs? Please identify any sources of specific evidence to which we should have regard. Several research activities are under way right now. TCCA have commissioned London School of Economics and WIK-Consult to document the net cost savings. Those reports will be complete in September and we will be happy to forward the final version to Ofcom. Early draft results from LSE include: 1.2-1.7bn annual socio economic benefit resulting from an estimated 10-14 per cent of current homicide, serious wounding and sexual assault crime costs benefitting from mobile broadband to derive a favourable outcome; 1 If mobile broadband can be utilised to assist ambulance crews deliver faster and more direct responses to treat heart attack victims, for every 560 lives saved, an estimated 1bn socio economic benefit could result, 2 with the current target being 3,000 extra lives by the Ambulance Service. 3 If the current productivity increases of at least 10 per cent occurred across all UK Police Forces as observed by some UK Police Forces from the more enhanced use of mobile broadband, 4 the efficiency benefits in policing could improve current intervention rates and result in an additional 350,000 interventions per annum that could deliver socio economic benefits of 1bn-4bn per annum depending on the mix of crimes intervened. 1 Intervention estimates obtained from: Johur, J. (2013). Evaluating the Benefits of Mission-Critical Mobile Broadband to the UK Police Service. MBA Thesis. Henley Business School. Additional primary and secondary research undertaken. 2 LSE Research. 3 Price, L. (2006). Treating the clock and not the patient: ambulance response times and risk. Quality and Safety in Health Care;15: pp127 130. 4 http://www.straighttalkonline.com/cio-articles/going-mobile-wiltshire

If UK Traffic Police achieved comparable results as some US Highway Patrols in increasing their efficiency by reducing traffic stop times due to the enhanced and integrated use of mobile broadband, 5 the potential socio economic benefits from averted fatalities and serious injuries could be between 0.5bn-5bn per annum. If the current efficiency benefits in undertaking some integrated operational duties between the frontline and back-office being obtained by some UK Police Forces 6 were realised across the UK s Police Force, potential efficiency savings of over 150m per annum could be obtained. The socio economic cost of a 5 per cent degradation of service availability to emergency services in times of mission critical dependency, particularly for large scale emergencies, could result in a socio economic cost of over 5bn, whilst even a 0.5 per cent decrease can yield a socio economic cost of 0.5bn. 7 Such a reduction in service could occur where spectrum is not available in a dedicated manner for public safety. Furthermore we can make reference to Cost analysis of crimes and disasters done in Germany: PPDR Spectrum Harmonisation in Germany, Europe and Globally, Study for the German Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology (BMWi), WIK-Consult 2010. Work done in Asia: John Ure (2013), Public Protection and Disaster Relief (PPDR) Services and Broadband in Asia and the Pacific: A Study of Value and Opportunity Cost in the Assignment of Radio Spectrum. Work done by Henley Business School: Evaluating the benefits of mission-critical mobile broadband to the UK Police Service. A MBA Dissertation, Jason J. Johur. 5 University of Cincinnati Policing Institute. Traffic Stop Data Analysis Study: Year 3 Final Report. November, 2009. 6 British APCO Journal. January 31, 2012. 7 Sampling estimates obtained from: Johur, J. (2013). Evaluating the Benefits of Mission-Critical Mobile Broadband to the UK Police Service. MBA Thesis. Henley Business School. Additional primary and secondary research undertaken.

Question 3: Have we correctly identified and characterised the potential benefits set out above, and what other benefits if any should be taken into account in our assessment? The main benefits from efficient Emergency Services are realised by reduction of lives lost, health care costs, working days lost, reduction of cost of crime (including the costs of the legal system), lost taxes from lost lives, damage to property and so on. All need to be taken into account as benefits. CEPT recently approved and published ECC Report 199 that concluded the need for broadband PPDR spectrum to be "in the range 2 x 10 MHz" for permanent data communication usage only, although some countries are demanding much more spectrum than this for their Emergency Services. A common opinion in the PPDR spectrum discussion has long been that PPDR spectrum should be identified below 1 GHz to enable good range per base station and therefore reasonable cost efficiency when investing public funds either via direct government investment or service charges to a contracted operator and we share this view. This view is further confirmed in CEPT by decision of WG FM to continue broadband PPDR studies in a new ECC Report focusing on the 700 MHz and 400 MHz frequency ranges for the wide area network. It is easy to see that the current utilisation of frequencies between 400 MHz and 1 GHz is already high and subject to ever increasing demand and pressure. As the need on average is as much as 2 x 10 MHz and knowing the approximate current occupancy of the UK 400 MHz PMR bands, the only remaining frequency range to solve that in UK seems to be within the current UHF TV broadcasting bands in the range 470 to 790 MHz. ECC is currently studying in a longer term perspective this entire band. If the opportunity to address the 470 790 MHz frequencies is lost, the long term future of PPDR radio communication will be at real risk. More specifically, if the opportunity to address the 700 MHz frequencies in UK is lost, the future of PPDR radio communication is at risk at the date when the current Airwave service contracts expire. Question 4: What evidence, whether qualitative or quantitative, should we obtain and/or take into account in assessing each of these potential benefits? Please identify any sources of specific evidence to which we should have regard. Benefits of a dedicated network to society is only realised if PPDR forces can perform their necessary operations, also when commercial networks are overloaded, off the air or under cyber attack. ECC report 199: User requirements and spectrum needs for future European broadband PPDR systems (Wide Area Networks), May 2013

Law Enforcement Working Party (LEWP) of the European Council differentiates normal communication with Mission Critical Communication, which enables Mission critical operations for PPDR organisations that address situations where human life and goods (rescue operations, law enforcement) and other values for society are at risk, especially when time is a vital factor. This means we define mission critical information as the vital information for PPDR to succeed with the operation. Mission critical communication solutions therefore means that PPDR needs secure, reliable and available communication and as a consequence cannot afford the risk of having failures in their individual and group communication (e.g. voice and data or video transmissions). The view of today's PPDR network operators: Senior representatives of PPDR operators from 13 European nations as well as representatives from a number of Ministries of Interior met for two days in Amsterdam in February 2013 to review the status of the efforts by the TCCA on this subject. The meeting noted the progress in 3GPP, where essential new functionality was added to the work program. The meeting pledged continued support for the work. The meeting was equally pleased with the progress in CEPT FM, where the FM 49 s Report A was adopted for public consultation. The meeting reiterated unanimously the need to allocate sufficient harmonised spectrum for future PPDR services as this would provide their governments with most flexibility. Question 8: Have we correctly identified the costs and benefits that could vary depending on the timing of release, and the impact of those factors? Are there other costs and benefits which would vary depending on the timing of release of the 700 MHz band which we should take into account? An issue specific to the UK is the timing and expiry of the existing Airwave service contracts, which would have impact also on the narrowband PPDR radio service. Question 8-24: No response.

Yours Faithfully, Phil Kidner Chief executive