MEASUREMENT OF THE EARTH-OBSERVER-1 SATELLITE X-BAND PHASED ARRAY

Similar documents
LE/ESSE Payload Design

ICO S-BAND ANTENNAS TEST PROGRAM

A LARGE COMBINATION HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL NEAR FIELD MEASUREMENT FACILITY FOR SATELLITE ANTENNA CHARACTERIZATION

ANECHOIC CHAMBER DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING

MISSION TO MARS - IN SEARCH OF ANTENNA PATTERN CRATERS

Accuracy Estimation of Microwave Holography from Planar Near-Field Measurements

ANECHOIC CHAMBER EVALUATION

A COMPOSITE NEAR-FIELD SCANNING ANTENNA RANGE FOR MILLIMETER-WAVE BANDS

APPLICATIONS OF PORTABLE NEAR-FIELD ANTENNA MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS

ALIGNMENT SENSITIVITY AND CORRECTION METHODS FOR MILLIMETER- WAVE SPHERICAL NEAR-FIELD MEASUREMENTS

SPHERICAL NEAR-FIELD SELF-COMPARISON MEASUREMENTS

A TECHNIQUE TO EVALUATE THE IMPACT OF FLEX CABLE PHASE INSTABILITY ON mm-wave PLANAR NEAR-FIELD MEASUREMENT ACCURACIES

Upgraded Planar Near-Field Test Range For Large Space Flight Reflector Antennas Testing from L to Ku-Band

PERFORMANCE CONSIDERATIONS FOR PULSED ANTENNA MEASUREMENTS

SPHERICAL NEAR-FIELD MEASUREMENTS AT UHF FREQUENCIES WITH COMPLETE UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS

IMPROVING AND EXTENDING THE MARS TECHNIQUE TO REDUCE SCATTERING ERRORS

Antennas Orbits Modulation Noise Link Budgets U N I V E R S I T Y O F. Spacecraft Communications MARYLAND. Principles of Space Systems Design

BENEFITS FOR DEPLOYABLE QUADRIFILAR HELICAL ANTENNA MODULES FOR SMALL SATELLITES

ELEC4604. RF Electronics. Experiment 1

PROBE CORRECTION EFFECTS ON PLANAR, CYLINDRICAL AND SPHERICAL NEAR-FIELD MEASUREMENTS

Satellite Testing. Prepared by. A.Kaviyarasu Assistant Professor Department of Aerospace Engineering Madras Institute Of Technology Chromepet, Chennai

33 BY 16 NEAR-FIELD MEASUREMENT SYSTEM

Chapter 5. Array of Star Spirals

RAYTHEON 23 x 22 50GHZ PULSE SYSTEM

A TURNKEY NEAR-FIELD MEASUREMENT SYSTEM FOR PULSE MODE APPLICATIONS

HOW TO CHOOSE AN ANTENNA RANGE CONFIGURATION

Accurate Planar Near-Field Results Without Full Anechoic Chamber

Miniaturized GPS Antenna Array Technology and Predicted Anti-Jam Performance

Millimetre Spherical Wave Antenna Pattern Measurements at NPL. Philip Miller May 2009

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R S.1512

Using Frequency Diversity to Improve Measurement Speed Roger Dygert MI Technologies, 1125 Satellite Blvd., Suite 100 Suwanee, GA 30024

RECOMMENDATION ITU-R SNG * Uniform technical standards (analogue) for satellite news gathering (SNG)

REFLECTION SUPPRESSION IN LARGE SPHERICAL NEAR-FIELD RANGE

W-Band Satellite Transmission in the WAVE Mission

Exploiting Link Dynamics in LEO-to-Ground Communications

FLATPANELELECTRONICALLYSCANNED ANTENNAADVANTAGES

Worst-Case GPS Constellation for Testing Navigation at Geosynchronous Orbit for GOES-R

Main features. System configurations. I Compact Range SOLUTION FOR

Sub-millimeter Wave Planar Near-field Antenna Testing

SATELLITE LINK DESIGN

Software. Equipment. Add-ons. Accessories. Services

DRONACHARYA GROUP OF INSTITUTIONS, GREATER NOIDA. SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS (EEC 021) QUESTION BANK

System configurations. Main features. I TScan SOLUTION FOR

Microwave/Millimeter-wave Antenna Test System

A DUAL-RECEIVER METHOD FOR SIMULTANEOUS MEASUREMENTS OF RADOME TRANSMISSION EFFICIENCY AND BEAM DEFLECTION

FORMATION FLYING PICOSAT SWARMS FOR FORMING EXTREMELY LARGE APERTURES

A Method for Gain over Temperature Measurements Using Two Hot Noise Sources

TELECOMMUNICATION SATELLITE TELEMETRY TRACKING AND COMMAND SUB-SYSTEM

T- DualScan. StarLab

Non-Ideal Quiet Zone Effects on Compact Range Measurements

The CReSIS Anechoic Chamber is located at: The University of Kansas. M2SEC building W 15 th St. Lawrence, KS

A BROADBAND POLARIZATION SELECTABLE FEED FOR COMPACT RANGE APPLICATIONS

INDOOR AUTOMATIC F-16 FIRE CONTROL ANTENNA AND RADOME TEST FACILITIES

IMPLEMENTATION OF BACK PROJECTION ON A SPHERICAL NEAR- FIELD RANGE

WIESON TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.

> StarLab. Multi-purpose Antenna Measurement Multi-protocol Antenna Development Linear Array Antenna Measurement OTA Testing

Chapter 4 The RF Link

SATELLITE SUBSYSTEMS. Networks and Communication Department. Dr. Marwah Ahmed

CHARACTERIZATION OF PHASE SHIFTERS ON A KU-BAND PHASED ARRAY ANTENNA ESA/ESTEC, NOORDWIJK, THE NETHERLANDS 3-5 OCTOBER 2012

B ==================================== C

Conventional measurement systems

Technical characteristics and protection criteria for aeronautical mobile service systems in the frequency range GHz

Introduction to Radar Systems. Radar Antennas. MIT Lincoln Laboratory. Radar Antennas - 1 PRH 6/18/02

FCC ID: A3LSLS-BD106Q. Report No.: HCT-RF-1801-FC003. Plot Data for Output Port 2_QPSK 9 khz ~ 150 khz Middle channel 150 khz ~ 30 MHz Low channel

Nonlinear Effects in Active Phased Array System Performance

I SARA 08/10/13. Pre-Decisional Information -- For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only

Introduction Antenna Ranges Radiation Patterns Gain Measurements Directivity Measurements Impedance Measurements Polarization Measurements Scale

REVERBERATION CHAMBER FOR EMI TESTING

X/Y Antenna Ground Terminals: A Small Sat Cost Effective Approach

High Accuracy Spherical Near-Field Measurements On a Stationary Antenna

GAIN COMPARISON MEASUREMENTS IN SPHERICAL NEAR-FIELD SCANNING

Exercise 1-3. Radar Antennas EXERCISE OBJECTIVE DISCUSSION OUTLINE DISCUSSION OF FUNDAMENTALS. Antenna types

HEMERA Constellation of passive SAR-based micro-satellites for a Master/Slave configuration

Phased Array Polarization Switches

Near-Field Antenna Measurements using a Lithium Niobate Photonic Probe

Microwave/Millimeter-wave Antenna Test System

X-band CubeSat Communication System Demonstration

A Reconfigurable Antenna Based on an Electronically Tunable Reflectarray

Space Systems Engineering

NTT DOCOMO Technical Journal. Method for Measuring Base Station Antenna Radiation Characteristics in Anechoic Chamber. 1.

Spacecraft Communications

Electronic Scanning Antennas Product Information

Keywords: cylindrical near-field acquisition, mechanical and electrical errors, uncertainty, directivity.

ADVANCED 14/12 AND 30/20 GHz MULTIPLE BEAM ANTENNA TECHNOLOGY FOR COMMUNICATIONS SATELLITES

Follow that Ground Station! And double the data throughput using polarization diversity.

Millimeter Spherical µ-lab System from Orbit/FR

Further Refining and Validation of RF Absorber Approximation Equations for Anechoic Chamber Predictions

A study of Low Sidelobe Technology of Reflector Antenna and the Experimental Result of Decreasing its Sidelobe Level

Millimeter Wave Measurement System

Feeding Systems of Phased Arrays

ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS COMMITTEE

The Importance of Polarization Purity Author: Lars J Foged, Scientific Director at MVG (Microwave Vision Group)

Satellite TVRO G/T calculations

Design, Trade-Off and Advantages of a Reconfigurable Dual Reflector for Ku Band Applications

Interplanetary CubeSat Launch Opportunities and Payload Accommodations

A CYLINDRICAL NEAR-FIELD VS. SPHERICAL NEAR-FIELD ANTENNA TEST COMPARISON

A DUAL-PORTED PROBE FOR PLANAR NEAR-FIELD MEASUREMENTS

Radiation Pattern of Waveguide Antenna Arrays on Spherical Surface - Experimental Results

SATELLIT COMMUNICATION

AIRBORNE ANTENNAS FOR BROADBAND SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS

Transcription:

MEASUREMENT OF THE EARTH-OBSERVER-1 SATELLITE X-BAND PHASED ARRAY Kenneth Perko (1), Louis Dod (2), and John Demas (3) (1) Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, (2) Swales Aerospace, Beltsville, Maryland, (3) Near-Field Systems, Carson, California ABSTRACT The recent launch and successful orbiting of the EO-1 Satellite has provided an opportunity to validate the performance of a newly developed X-Band transmitonly phased array aboard the satellite. This paper will compare results of planar near-field testing before and after spacecraft installation as well as on-orbit pattern characterization. The transmit-only array is used as a high data rate antenna for relaying scientific data from the satellite to earth stations. The antenna contains distributed solid-state amplifiers behind each antenna element that cannot be monitored except for radiation pattern measurements. A unique portable planar near-field scanner allows both radiation pattern measurements and also diagnostics of array aperture distribution before and after environmental testing over the ground-integration and pre-launch testing of the satellite. The antenna beam scanning software was confirmed from actual pattern measurements of the scanned beam positions during the spacecraft assembly testing. The scanned radiation patterns on-orbit were compared to the near-field patterns made before launch to confirm the antenna performance. The near-field measurement scanner has provided a versatile testing method for satellite high gain data-link antennas. Keywords: Antenna Measurements, Phased Arrays, Near Field Scanners, Planar Near Field, Data Acquisition. requirement. This X-Band antenna is the first phased array to be flown from this development program. Boeing Phantom Works developed the antenna under NASA contract. The antenna was delivered to NASA after acceptance testing at Boeing Phantom Works. The antenna was then integrated into the Earth Observer Spacecraft-1 (EO-1) at Swales Aerospace. The antenna consists of 64 antenna elements, each with its own power amplifier integrated into the array package. Power dividers and phase shifters are included in the antenna feed network. A digitally modulated low-level X-band signal is input to the array. A radome covers the planar array face as shown in figure 1. This paper will describe the antenna testing of this array. The antenna is a phased array that scans a high gain beam using phase shifters. This antenna does not require mechanical motion that must be compensated by the satellite stabilization system. Planar near field measurements were made on the phased array before installation on the spacecraft. The phased array was installed on the spacecraft and near-field testing was repeated during the spacecraft integration. The portable near-field scanner system allowed testing of the antenna on the spacecraft in large test chambers as well as at the box-level in the assembly area. 1.0 Introduction This paper describes the successful RF testing of a highdata rate transmit-only antenna for the Earth Observer-1 Satellite launched from Vandenberg AFB in November 2000. The phased array antenna operates at an X-Band frequency and provides a high data-rate downlink from the satellite to earth ground stations. The requirement for increased science data rates from small satellites has caused the development of high-gain phased arrays that are electronically scanned without mechanical motion. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration, (NASA), has developed antennas spacecraft phased array antennas at X-, Ku-, and Ka-band frequencies for this Figure 1. X-Band Phased Array Antenna

The planar near-field scanner permitted rapid nonintrusive tests of the array and provided a diagnostic tool for the assessment of the performance of the 64 solid-state amplifiers behind the 64 circularly polarized antennas in the array. There are no monitoring points for RF sampling of the transmitted signal from the array. However, the near-field measured amplitude and phase data from the full array can be back-transformed to obtain the aperture distribution of the array. The aperture distribution contains the illumination from each of the 64 antennas forming the array and the element locations and amplitudes are clearly visible in the plots from the transform as shown in figure 2. Repeated measurements during the test and integration of the spacecraft antenna provided valuable diagnostics on the illumination of the array. Figure 3 shows the antenna near-field testing on the spacecraft. 2. Preflight Testing The first pre-flight testing involved the radiation pattern and EIRP measurements of the phased array immediately after delivery from Boeing. These tests were made on the antenna alone before installation on the spacecraft. The second phase of the testing involved repeated measurement of the antenna after installation on the spacecraft. The original antenna data sets were compared to the antenna measurements while installed on the spacecraft using near-field measurements of radiation patterns and gain. Back transforms from the near-field data were used for diagnostics before and after spacecraft environmental testing. Finally, on-orbit patterns were measured using the NASA Goddard 3 meter ground station. These measurement series have confirmed the end-to-end performance of the array as it is scanned. The post-shipping initial radiation pattern measurements of the antenna array were conducted at Swales Aerospace. The Near-Field Systems portable 2x2 scanner was installed over the antenna and horizontal scans of the antenna were performed. The amplitude contour plot data from the initial near-field measurement is shown in figure 4. Figure 2. Phased Array Aperture Distribution from Near-Field Back-Transform. Figure 4. Phased Array Initial Measurement, Far- Field Contour Plot From Measured Near-Field Data. Figure 3. Near-Field Scanner measurement of the Phased Array on the EO-1 spacecraft. The near-field measurements at Swales were compared to the radiation pattern data supplied by Boeing. There was good agreement on the pattern data and the antenna was prepared for spacecraft integration. The aperture distribution was obtained by the back transform of the near-field data as shown in figure 2.

The phased array with its embedded active amplifiers was measured for output power versus input power to determine the compression level of the active amplifiers behind each antenna element. The comparison of the data measured at Goddard and the data taken at Boeing show excellent agreement as shown in figure 5. patterns show the scanned main lobe and sidelobes for the uniform distribution array. XPAA Compression Measurements Output Relative db -8-9 -10-11 -12-13 -14-15 -16-17 -18-19 -20 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Input dbm Linear Response GSFC Measurement Boeing Measurement Figure 5. Compression Curves Measured by Boeing and Goddard. Near-field measurements of the phased array were taken for various scanned beam positions. The coordinate system for the scanned antenna patterns is shown in figure 6. This measurement series allowed the testing of the flight software for the digital phase shifter setting and confirmation of the true pointing location versus prediction. Figure 7. Three-dimensional Scan Patterns for Four Pointing Angles. The scanned pattern data holograms provided diagnostics for future measurements of the antenna as the spacecraft underwent environmental testing such as thermal vacuum testing and vibration testing. Figure 8 shows amplitude across the aperture as the antenna is commanded to scan position, (theta = 45, phi =315 degrees). I Figure 6. Coordinate System for far-field Antenna Patterns. The three dimensional far-field radiation patterns for four commanded scan positions are shown in figure 7. These Figure 8. Aperture Amplitude for Theta = 45, Phi = 315 Degree Scan.

The phase distribution for the same scan distribution is shown in figure 9. This phase contour may be compared with the boresite beam position where the phase is uniform across the aperture as shown in figure 10. Figure 9. Aperture Phase distribution for Scan position, Theta= 45, Phi = 315 Degrees. Figure 11. Figure 10. Aperture Phase Plot for Boresite Beam, Theta= 0, Phi = 0. 3.0 Antenna Testing on EO-1 Spacecraft The downlink signal from the spacecraft phased array is monitored during ground testing of the spacecraft. A hat coupler is placed over the aperture of the X-Band Phased Array. The hat coupler is lined with absorber material and contains a small probe antenna. The coupler provides a lossy transfer of RF downlink signal for spacecraft data monitoring purposes. The coupler is useful for housekeeping data monitoring but it does not permit the measurement of the antenna as the beam scanning software is activated. The portable 2x2 near-field scanner allows the non-intrusive monitoring of the antenna scan performance during spacecraft system testing as shown in figure 3. The spacecraft is mounted on a positioner in a large clean room. The NSI portable scanner is then located near the spacecraft and positioned in front of the X-Band Phased Array aperture. The Agilent 8510C network analyzer is placed in the clean room near the scanner. Antenna near-field tests can then be performed as the spacecraft is tested and then scanner can then be quickly removed from the proximity of the spacecraft. Since the phased array has no method for RF monitoring of all of the distributed amplifiers behind each phased array antenna element, the health of the phased array package can be monitored as needed. Confirmation of the spacecraft software for the antenna pointing can also be checked before launch. The near-field measurement method using the lightweight portable planar scanner should be useful for transmit-only arrays planned for future satellites. Spacecraft antenna testing of large antennas on communications satellites involves the development of large near-field scanner systems in highbay anechoic test chambers. These facilities are designed for testing the large communications satellite and are expensive but necessary for that class of payloads. The small satellite payload such as EO-1 with an electronically steered phased array can be tested at minimum cost and schedule using the portable scanner. The ability to use the holograms to determine the status of the antenna during the manufacture through spacecraft integration is unique to this method. 4.0 On-Orbit Antenna Testing Initially, there were problems receiving the X-band downlink signal after launch of the EO-1 Spacecraft. These problems were traced to the ground stations and were corrected. As part of the downlink problem investigation, the radiation patterns of the X-Band antenna while on-orbit were measured using two NASA ground stations. The tests involved pointing the X-band main lobe at boresite by commanding the satellite s phased array from ground. The received power from the boresite staring antenna was then measured for selected satellite passes that passed near-nadir for the ground stations

location. The power received at the ground station was corrected for path loss changes as the satellite moved over the station. The orbital path is projected on the measured pattern contour in figure 11. It can be seen that the boresite pattern is correct and that the antenna performance is confirmed. The resulting radiation pattern measured from on-orbit was then compared with the radiation pattern from the near-field tests of the array taken during spacecraft integration. The comparison of the two patterns in a rectangular plot is shown in figure 12. The comparison of the two patterns shows excellent agreement between the patterns for the main lobe and the first two sidelobes shown in the figure. The path of the pattern cut is a curve that cuts within 5 degrees of the peak of the main beam. Figure 13 shows the resulting pattern that was produced, in black squares. The red diamond data that is overlaid is the equivalent curved cut obtained from near field scans prior to launch. The gap in the center results from the fact that the cut does not cross the peak of the beam. The deviation of the measured data near the peak of the main beam is attributed to dynamic errors in ground station antenna pointing, which are worst when the satellite is at maximum elevation. 5.0 CONCLUSIONS Near field scanning proved to be a valuable and reliable technique for trending antenna performance throughout the mission life cycle. It was used to verify that the XPAA performed in a consistent manner throughout the spacecraft integration process. It was also used to verify the end-to-end performance of the EO-1 X-Band communications system, verifying that the antenna pointed where the attitude control system commanded. Figure 11. Measured X-Band Phased Array Pattern On-Orbit. By all measures made so far, the XPAA is performing flawlessly. It was designed to meet a requirement of one downlink per day for a year, delivering 40 Gigabits per day to the ground. The EO-1 project is currently receiving 160+ Gigabits of data per day during 4-5 downlinks via the X-Band system. For scan-performance measurement, the XPAA was operated normally; its beam pointed every half-second toward the ground station by commands from EO-1 s attitude control system. As EO-1 passed over the ground station, received power varied as the EIRP from the XPAA changed due to range, and scan angle effects. A NASA Ground Network station, the 11-meter antenna at GSFC/Wallops, was used to collect this data, usually in conjunction with a normal instrument data downlink. These measurements were made on clear days when rain attenuation was not a factor. Figure 12. Comparison of On-Orbit Measured Pattern With Pre-Launch near-field Pattern. The gain of the X-Band Phased Array was measured on the spacecraft during spacecraft integration in a large clean room. The comparative gain was measured using the near-field portable scanner. The large size of the clean room and careful positioning of the spacecraft antenna in the room using a three-axis positioner allowed for reflection free measurement. A comparison with a

standard gain horn in the clean room using the portable NSI near-field scanner resulted in a rapid gain measurement during the spacecraft integration testing sequence. 6.0 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors wish to thank the EO-1 Spacecraft Integration team and the staff at Boeing Phantom Works who built the XPAA, in particular Don McMeen and Ray Huggins. NSI consultant Alan Newell performed the near-field gain measurements of the antenna on EO-1 Spacecraft. The members of the Tiger Team that helped gather onorbit data and iron out the X-Band ground station issues in the first months after launch included Dave Israel, Larry Alexander, Art Azarbarzin, Deane Charlson, Frank Stocklin, Garry Fisher, Dan Mandl and Paul Garza (GSFC); Richard Kunath (GRC); J.R. Hendrickson (Consolidated Space Operations Contract - CSOC); Kelvin Brentzel, (GST); Gary Miller and Jim Takeuchi (Boeing).