Allied Radio Matrix for Emergency Response (ARMER) Standards, Protocols, Procedures

Similar documents
SAN DIEGO COUNTY MUTUAL AID RADIO PLAN

Communications Interoperability- Current Status

FIRESCOPE Radio Communications Guidelines MACS MULTI-AGENCY COORDINATION SYSTEM PUBLICATION

FLEET MAPPING. Session Overview and Objectives. Definitions. Cover Planning Basics. Examples of Design. Implementation requirements

Rulemaking Hearing Rules of the Tennessee Department of Health Bureau of Health Licensure and Regulation Division of Emergency Medical Services

NW RAC/RECB Public Safety Communications System Standards, Protocols, Procedures

Guide for Short Term Interoperability

Narrowbanding and Public Safety Communications

Guide for Short Term Interoperability Revised June 24, 2009

State Plan for Mutual Aid Communications Frequencies. Annex K Version 4.4

FY 2008 (October 1, 2007 September 30, 2008) NIMS Compliance Objectives and Metrics for Local Governments

San Mateo County Fire Service POLICIES AND STANDARDS MANUAL

KING COUNTY FIRE RESOURCE PLAN Section 9 King County Radio Interoperability

Tactical Interoperable Communications Plan Sioux Falls/Minnehaha/Lincoln Urban Area

System Overview 10/25/2010

SAN FRANCISCO EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES AGENCY EMS COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT AND PROCEDURES

Consultation Paper on Public Safety Radio Interoperability Guidelines

3 4 1: 2: SAFECOM : 4: 5: 6: 7: IP

ROUTT COUNTY, COLORADO

Public Safety Interoperable Communications (PSIC)

Basic IMS A R E S. Amateur Radio Emergency Communications. IMS For Amateur Radio. Self Study Training Course. Amateur Radio Emergency Service

Wyoming s Statewide Public-Safety Interoperable Radio Communications System WyoLink Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Santa Barbara County Operational Area Interoperable Communications Study Final Report. June 25, 2012

VOLUSIA COUNTY SHERIFF S OFFICE FIRE/EMS COMMUNICATIONS CENTER

Lincoln County Fire and Rescue Association Standard Operating Guideline (SOG)

Radio Communications Essentials. Module 5: Mutual Aid Agreements and Common Use Channels Mark Conrey

2 ESF 2 Communications

Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan

March 2014 MACS FIRESCOPE Radio Communications Guidelines MACS 441-1

KING COUNTY FIRE MODEL PROCEDURE Section 15 Abandon / Withdraw

CONCEPTS TO OPERATIONS, INC.

Amateur Radio Emergency Communications Interoperability Plan

Planning Your Communications

LMR Encryption Navigating Recent FCC Rule Changes

Response-Level Communications Workshop

MINNESOTA ARES SOG 6-C-001. Standard Operating Guide Simplex Frequency Pool. Jan. 14, 2016

A legacy of regional cooperation, a commitment to a vibrant future. National Capital Region Communications Interoperability Group Procedures

Writing Guide for Standard Operating Procedures

Minnesota Department of Public Safety ARMER. A resource public safety officials need to do their job

FCC Report to Congress: Maintaining Communications Following a Major Disaster

Best Operating Practice

Cross-Border Interoperability Report Overview CANUS CIWG Meeting

INTEROPERABILITY PLANNING FOR PUBLIC SAFETY

MOTOBRIDGE IP Interoperable Solution

Emergency Support Function 2. Communications. Iowa County Emergency Management Agency

Missouri Statewide Interoperability Network. DNR Park Rangers Conference April 2018

Auxiliary Emergency Communications (AEC)

Western Region- WAGIN. Tactical Interoperable Communications Plan (TICP)

Table of Contents. Nebraska Statewide Interoperability Mutual Aid Standard Operating Procedures (approved 2/24/11)

800 System Procedures

National Incident Management System

INCIDENT COMMAND SYSTEM POSITION MANUAL SAFE REFUGE AREA MANAGER ICS-1107 JULY 2016

Sept 28, Mukhtar mook-tar Thakur

Training that is standardized and supports the effective operations of NIIMS.

INTERNAL AUDIT DIVISION CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT

CONOPS Interoperability. Maine Emergency Management Agency & Maine Department of Public Safety State of Maine 7/6/2015

National Incident Management System

Joint System Owners Customer Information Meeting Thursday, December 7, 2017 Environmental Service Building

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA MONITORING ASSOCIATION In God We Trust All Others We Monitor

Technical Requirements for Land Mobile and Fixed Radio Services Operating in the Bands / MHz and / MHz

Example: COUNTY: Engine 225, County, are you requesting to 2nd alarm? UNIT: Engine 225, Affirmative.

Current Systems. 1 of 6

SOLUTIONS Paper Wi4 Fixed: Point-to-Point Wireless Broadband Solutions. Point-to-Point Connectivity in the 4.9 GHz Public Safety Band

RADIO COMMUNICATIONS DEGRADATION & INTEROPERABILITY OR CAN YOU HEAR ME NOW? Presenter: Jon Bromberg (W1JDB) Eastside Fire & Rescue COML/COMT

2017 NIMS Update. John Ford, National Integration Center

Regional Radio System

PALM BEACH COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY DIVISION OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT STANDARD OPERATING GUIDE COMMUNITY EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM

The Florida 700 MHz Public Safety Interoperability Channel Plan. Division of Telecommunications

LOUDON COUNTY ARES EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN

Statewide IC Zone. The Statewide IC Zone common use talkgroups: Statewide IC Zone Monitored by Dispatch North Zone Tactical Responder Talkgroup

APCO Emerging Technology Forum Toronto, Canada

RADIO TECHNICAL OPERATIONS COMMITTEE AGENDA

Phoenix Regional Dispatch Interoperability Guide

State of Kansas Field Operations Guide (KS-FOG)

Concept of Operations. Emergency Support Function (ESF) # 2 Communications

APCO Technology Forum THE CONVERGENCE OF WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS IN PUBLIC SAFETY. Andrew M. Seybold

Butler County Department of Emergency Services. Butler County Radio Project Briefing

CHATHAM COUNTY EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN

Narrow-banding What It Means to Public Safety Webinar

Interoperability Training

OhioHealth Emergency Medical Services Event Medicine

Report on the Use of Encryption on the Interoperability Channels

SPECIAL SPECIFICATION 8802 Radio Communication Tower Inspection, Maintenance, and Repair

Central Minnesota Radio Board

Title- RADIO PROTOCOL FOR EMERGENCY INCIDENTS CLASSIFICATION POLICY STATEMENT

DCC Trunked Radio System Proposer Questions and Answers, rev 2 September 28, 2011

R E V I S E D 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ACTION ITEMS. 2a. Approval of Minutes February 25, 2016* 2b. Draft Fire Communications Plan*

Communications Annex (ESF-2)

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY PLACEMENT: DEPARTMENTAL PRESET: TITLE: PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO SYSTEM STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

Missouri State Interoperability Executive Committee 700 MHz Interoperable Channel Template

EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS

The Benefits of Project 25

BUTLER REGIONAL INTEROPERABLE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM 800 MHz ADVISORY BOARD MEETING MINUTES

IFERN / IFERN 2 Radio Base Stations for all Wisconsin MABAS Divisions/Counties

PROCEDURES Page 1 of 5 Communications SVOM Revised

Project 25 Mission Critical PTT

Unit 2: Understanding NIMS

Mission Critical Push to Talk: Considerations for the Management of User ID and First Responder Identity

BUTLER REGIONAL INTEROPERABLE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM 800 MHz ADVISORY BOARD MEETING MINUTES

FIXED MOUNT DVRS INDOOR/OUTDOOR APPLICATION NOTE. March 2016 Version 4

Transcription:

Allied Radio Matrix for Emergency Response (ARMER) Standards, Protocols, Procedures Document Section: 3 Interoperability Standards Status: Complete Sub Section: State Procedure Title: 800 MHz Statewide Incident Response Talkgroups: STACs, ETACs, FTACs, & LTACs Date Established: SRB Approval: 10/25/07 Replaces Document Dated: 5/18/06 Date Revised: 10/25/07 1. Purpose or Objective: To establish policy & procedures for use of standardized statewide 800 MHz major incident response interoperability talkgroups and standardized incident command zones in user radios. The statewide incident response talkgroups are a system wide resource intended to facilitate communications among and between different agencies and service branches which need to coordinate their operations during major incidents. This policy will provide standardized incident response radio communications capabilities for all service branches and most importantly will support the redeployment of mutual aid resources throughout the state. This policy will provide the radio communications structure necessary to enable effective situational awareness, command & control, and resource coordination in support of the incident command and management structure specified under NIMS. This policy will also serve to minimize usage conflicts when statewide incident response talkgroups are needed for multiple incidents. A process will be established for obtaining and documenting variances from the Statewide Radio Board for any radios where the inclusion of the minimum required statewide incident response talkgroups is either operationally undesired or burdensome in some other way. This standardization, along with access to the list of non compatible radios granted variances, will provide Incident Commanders and Communications Unit Leader personnel the ability to develop and adapt incident radio communications plans quickly and effectively without having to know in advance, or extract in the field, the code plug contents of each responding radio to determine compatibility. 2. Technical Background: Capabilities It is possible to establish one or more groups of shared statewide incident response talkgroups used by agencies that share use of the regional 800 MHz radio system. These talkgroups can be programmed into user radios, dispatch centers, incident command posts and emergency operations centers. These shared statewide talkgroups can meet a wide range of tactical interoperability needs and can function as the primary communications component in local, regional and statewide all hazards response plans. Within technical limitations, patching of the statewide talkgroups can be done to non hard patched conventional resources, local and regional shared talkgroups and to private talkgroups as needed to facilitate communications. 1

Constraints The highest and most effective level of interoperability is achieved when users share the same radio system and have shared talk groups directly accessible to them in their radios. Lower and less effective levels of interoperability include: switching to shared conventional frequencies, dispatch console patches, deployable portable gateways and radio caches (swap radios). The availability of and the use of the statewide incident response talkgroups must be easily understood by radio user personnel who are primarily concerned with their mission and not with the operation of complex radios under stressful conditions. Standardization of capabilities, i.e. establishment of an incident response radio template with certain common talkgroups, will provide responding agencies with an assurance that they will have operational compatibility with any other agency they need to work with. Only the minimum necessary quantity of the statewide incident response talkgroups should be mandated to be programmed into first responder radios to avoid unnecessarily driving radio purchases to higher cost or to radios that are unnecessarily complex and difficult to use. Any 800 MHz radio system talkgroup can be in only one patch whether it is a hard (technician set permanent) or soft (radio console operator set temporary) patch. Some of these talkgroups may be used as part of a soft patch to common VHF channels that are restricted for use by personnel of specific services such as the MINSEF VHF frequency may only be used by law enforcement and EMS personnel. 3. Operational Context: The shared statewide incident response talkgroups are a system wide resource to facilitate communications among agencies and service branches that typically do not communicate with each other on a regular day to day basis and to support effective command and management of major incidents under the NIMS protocols. 4. Standardized Policy STAC TALKGROUPS ALL USERS TG Requirements Required Recommended Optional Not Allowed Site Access For Whom? All ARMER Users All Radios All Dispatch N/A N/A N/A System Wide All Sites Cross Patch Standard YES / NO To TalkGroups Soft Patch Optional As Needed Hard Patch No ETAC TALKGROUPS EMS TG Requirements Required For Whom? All EMS Users 2

Recommended Optional Not Allowed Site Access EOCs, Incident Command, 9 1 1 PSAPs Hospitals Public Service System Wide All Sites Cross Patch Standard YES / NO To TalkGroups Soft Patch Optional As Needed Hard Patch No FTAC TALKGROUPS FIRE TG Requirements Required Recommended Optional Not Allowed Site Access For Whom? All Fire Users EOCs, Incident Command, 9 1 1 PSAPs EMS, HAZMAT, Law Enforcement Public Service System Wide All Sites Cross Patch Standard YES / NO To TalkGroups Soft Patch Optional As Needed Hard Patch No LTAC TALKGROUPS LAW ENFORCEMENT TG Requirements Required Recommended Optional Not Allowed Site Access For Whom? All Law Enforcement Users EOCs, Incident Command, 9 1 1 PSAPs EMS, Security Public Service System Wide All Sites Cross Patch Standard YES / NO To TalkGroups Soft Patch Optional As Needed Hard Patch No Primary Intended Use STACs, ETACs, FTACs, and LTACs should be used as the primary resource for major mutual aid incidents involving joint response from multiple agencies and/or service branches. Individual service branches, i.e. EMS, Fire, Law Enforcement, etc., may establish incident level thresholds to further define when the shared statewide incident response talkgroups should be utilized. Best Practices Encouraged Agencies are encouraged to follow practices outlined by the US Department of Homeland Security SAFECOM Program. Key elements of SAFECOM include: Regional and statewide interoperability SOPs for incident response should be developed and should be molded to conform to the elements of the National Incident Management System. Users should be provided with regular comprehensive training on the interoperability 3

SOPs. Interoperability SOPs should be tested through realistic exercises to address potential problems. The interoperability systems and SOPs should be used every day for managing routine as well as emergency incidents requiring interoperability. In this optimal solution, users are familiar with the operation of the system and routinely work in concert with one another. Trained Communications Unit Leaders should be developed to assist with incident pre plans and to provide on scene incident support by managing communications and apply available technical solutions at larger or unexpected interoperability incidents. Incident Scope and Geographic Area The shared statewide incident response talkgroups are available for use in incidents anywhere the ARMER system provides geographic coverage regardless of incident size or scale. Interoperability incidents may be localized or dispersed in area. Participating incident personnel and resources may be localized, regional, statewide or national. Incidents may be pre planned or emergent in nature. Secondary Intended Use On a secondary basis, if other talk groups are not available, the shared statewide incident response talkgroups may be used for day to day and task force type interoperability requirements among multiple agencies. Use for major incident exercises and drills is encouraged. Non intended Use The statewide talkgroups are not to be used for daily routine operations. Priorities for Use & Multiple Incidents In the event multiple interoperability incidents occur simultaneously exhausting the shared statewide incident response talkgroups, assignment of STAC, ETAC, FTAC, and LTAC talkgroups in incident radio communications plans will be prioritized for: (1) mutual aid incidents, and (2) those incidents involving resources spanning multiple regions. Secondary use and localized or single region mutual aid incidents initially assigned to shared statewide incident response talkgroups should be reassigned to regional or local coordination talk groups such as the regional PTACs and ATACs. This reassignment will be coordinated between the effected incident commanders and dispatch centers controlling the incidents. Console Resource Requirements and Patching Integrated ARMER dispatch consoles shall have the STACs and the appropriate service branch talk groups in the console configuration available for patching. In order to meet the communications needs for an event, the STAC, ETAC, FTAC, and LTAC talkgroups may be patched to: Conventional RF resources, such as VHF, UHF, etc. Private agency talkgroups, such as dispatch mains, tactical talkgroups, pools etc. Patches between the ETAC, FTAC, and LTAC talkgroups to bridge service branches together when STACs are fully allocated. 4

Patches between the ETAC, FTAC, and LTAC talkgroups and regional PTACs and ATACs, although this would not be preferred as a method of resolving communications needs because it reduces the number of talk groups available for an incident. Assignment Tracking The "Status Board" application on dispatch consoles shall be used to manage and track assignment of the statewide incident response talkgroup resources. Use of the NIMS/ ICS 205 Incident Radio Communications Plan form attached to this Standard is highly recommended to assist with assignment tracking for pre planned incidents, incidents utilizing more than one of the statewide talkgroups, and for incidents of long duration. Implementation Deadline The four STAC talkgroups and the four associated public safety service branch statewide talkgroups (ETAC, FTAC, and LTAC) must be programmed into all corresponding service branch radios on the ARMER system by January 1, 2008, or have an exception report and approved variance on file with the Statewide Radio Board. Standardized Zone Configuration To facilitate uniform field access to the shared statewide incident response talkgroups it is STRONGLY ENCOURAGED that all user subscriber radios be programmed to include the following standardized Incident Command Zone or ICS Zone. The service branch specific ICS Zone must be programmed into all corresponding service branch radios on the ARMER system by January 1, 2008, or have an exception report on file with the Statewide Radio Board. STANDARDIZED ARMER SYSTEMWIDE INCIDENT COMMAND ZONE FOR MAJOR INCIDENT RESPONSE COORDINATION LAW PUBLIC POS ENFORCEMENT EMS FIRE SERVICE 1 *LOC CHOICE *LOC CHOICE *LOC CHOICE *LOC CHOICE 2 L TAC1 E TAC1 F TAC1 **A TAC1 3 L TAC2 E TAC2 F TAC2 **A TAC2 4 L TAC3 E TAC3 F TAC3 **A TAC3 5 L TAC4 E TAC4 F TAC4 **A TAC4 6 S TAC1 S TAC1 S TAC1 S TAC1 7 S TAC2 S TAC2 S TAC2 S TAC2 8 S TAC3 S TAC3 S TAC3 S TAC3 9 S TAC4 S TAC4 S TAC4 S TAC4 10 **P TAC1 **P TAC1 **P TAC1 LOC CH/ BLANK 11 **P TAC2 **P TAC2 **P TAC2 LOC CH/ BLANK 12 **P TAC3 **P TAC3 **P TAC3 LOC CH/ BLANK 13 **P TAC4 **P TAC4 **P TAC4 LOC CH/ BLANK 14 LOC CH/ BLANK LOC CH/ BLANK LOC CH/ BLANK LOC CH/ BLANK 15 P SOA 1 P SOA 1 P SOA 1 LOC CH/ BLANK 16 A SOA 1 A SOA 1 A SOA 1 A SOA 1 5

* TYPICALLY USER S DISPATCH MAIN **REGIONAL VERSION OF THIS TALKGROUP Zone Name Requirement The Incident Command Zone or ICS Zone shall be designated with the prefix IC in all display radios. Zone Location in Radio Recommendation It is highly recommended that the ICS Zone be located immediately adjacent to (either above or below) the users primary day to day zone in display radios. It is highly recommended that the IC Zone be located in the C Zone in non display radios with an A/B/C zone selector switch. Service Branch Talk Groups also in Primary Zone Recommendation If there is space available it is recommended that the four service branch specific statewide talkgroups also be located in the respective user s primary day to day zone, (typically zone A or zone 1) in addition to the ICS Zone. Quick Reference Guide Requirement The standardized quick reference guide attached at the end of this standard shall be issued to all users of the ARMER system. Multi Group Prohibition None of the STAC, ETAC, FTAC, and LTAC talkgroups shall be part of any multi group. Recording The STAC, ETAC, FTAC, and LTAC recording procedure falls under Section 3.1h Recording Interagency Talkgroups. 5. Standardized Procedure: Notification When a statewide talkgroup resource is needed, the requesting agency will contact the dispatch center controlling the incident, or Incident Commander as appropriate, to have the next preferred available system wide talkgroup assigned. The system wide talkgroups may either be used directly, or be patched to other resources to meet the communications needs of an event. Order of Use The usage of STAC, ETAC, FTAC, and LTAC talkgroups for PREPLANNED NON EMERGENCY interoperability events should be _TAC 4, 3, 2, 1 in that order. The usage of STAC, ETAC, FTAC, and LTAC talkgroups for UNPLANNED EMERGENCY interoperability events should be _TAC 1, 2, 3, 4 in that order. Unit Identification When operating on the shared statewide incident response talkgroups, users should initially identify in the following manner using plain English: Agency name, followed by 6

service branch or function designation, followed by call sign or unit number. Examples: "North EMS 512", "Elk River Police 512", "Washington County Public Works 512", "State Patrol 512", etc. Once established, ongoing communications between the same units may be shortened. Use of 10 Codes and Acronyms The use of 10 codes, signals, unique acronyms, and other codes should not be used on the statewide incident response talkgroups because there is no standardized set of codes. Plain English should be used in all cases. Patched Mutual Aid Channels Public Safety based conventional resources such as MINSEF, Fire etc. can only be patched to the Public Safety pool talkgroups or the preferred soft patch talkgroup. The rules for externally governed resources still apply in the use of these resources while patched to the STAC, ETAC, FTAC, and LTAC talkgroups. Termination of Use At the end of the event the initiating dispatch center will remove any patches that were placed for the event if any, and clear the status, so the other dispatchers will know this resource is available for use. 6. Management Dispatch Center Managers & Supervisors for agencies on the statewide ARMER system, Incident Commanders and ICS Communication Unit Leaders shall insure that the policy and procedure for usage and assignment of the STAC, ETAC, FTAC, and LTAC talkgroups be followed. The MnDOT System Administrator shall be responsible for the Status Board application. Dispatch center operators and ICS Communication Unit Leaders shall receive initial training and periodic refresher training on the use of this procedure. Variances and Exceptions The Statewide Radio Board shall review all variance requests and/or exception reports and provide a written response to the requesting agency. The following radios are eligible for a categorical exception of the talkgroup and/or Incident Command Zone requirement: Receive only radios. Control station radios configured as single talk group stations. Radios assigned to personnel or vehicles that are not first responders and are not part of a response plan to emergencies or disasters in any way such as internal building facilities maintenance, internal use in jails, etc. Radios that do not have operator selectable talkgroups such as Metro Transit buses, etc. Radios used by private contractors performing construction and other related services 7

under contract to a governmental entity. Entities applying for a categorical exception need only to submit an exception report. Exception reports shall include: An inventory of the quantity and typical duty assignment of the radios for which the variance is requested, and A list indicating which, if any, regional and statewide shared talk groups are programmed into each radio, or group of identical radios, including zone and channel slot information. Requests for variance shall include an exception report and demonstrate that the inclusion of the minimum required statewide incident response talkgroups and/or the required ICS Zone is either: Operationally undesired, or Burdensome in some other way. Management and Distribution of Exception Reports The State of Minnesota ARMER Interoperability Coordinator will be responsible for acquiring, updating, organizing and distributing exception reports. The exception reports will be distributed to holders of the State Emergency Communications Plan and the Metro Region Tactical Interoperability Communications Plan for use in incident response planning. Exception reports will also be made available to regional radio boards, emergency management directors, designated communications unit leaders and other individuals responsible for interoperable communications activities. 8

INCIDENT RADIO COMMUNICATIONS PLAN (Hand Print or Type & Print as MS Word Doc) 1. Incident Name/ Location 2. Date/ Time Prepared/ Updated 3. Operational Period Date/ Time 4. Basic Radio Channel & Talk Group Utilization Radio Type/Cache/ Band VHF/ 800, etc. EXAMPLE ARMER 800 MHZ DIGITAL Channel and/or Talk Group Name EXAMPLE E TAC1 Function LE/ Fire/ EMS/ Pub Wks, Transit, etc. EXAMPLE EMS Frequency/ Tone/ Talk Group ID EXAMPLE $8CC (80002252) Operational Assignment Division, Group, Unit EXAMPLE EMS BRANCH COMMAND NET Remarks Gateway/ Patches/ Portable Repeaters, etc. EXAMPLE COMMAND & CONTROL OF EMS UNIT LEADERS (TRIAGE, TRANSPORT & STAGING) BY EMS BRANCH DIRECTOR COMMS COORDINATED BY ICC 5. Prepared By Agency: COML: Approved By: 6. Continuation Pages Page Number of Note: Frequencies are Listed From a Mobile/ Portable Perspective ICS 205 Minneapolis/ St. Paul Urban Area Tactical Interoperable Communications (TIC) Plan

ARMER EXCEPTION REPORT NON STANDARDIZED ICS ZONE CONFIGURATION Agency Name & Address: Contact Name: Phone: Email: Date: Number of radios with this configuration: Portables Mobiles: Typical duty assignment using this configuration: Instructions: Fill in the zone letter/name/number at the top of the column and then fill in the channel position boxes to indicate the location of the following talkgroups: LTAC1 4, ETAC1 4, FTAC1 4, STAC1 4, Regional PTAC1 4 and Regional ATAC1 4. Fill out a separate form for each different variation of radio template. Submit to the Minnesota ARMER office. Pos ZONE ZONE ZONE ZONE ZONE ZONE ZONE ZONE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

CUT CUT RADIO "IC" ZONE STANDARDIZED ARMER SYSTEMWIDE INCIDENT COMMAND ZONE FOR MAJOR INCIDENT RESPONSE COORDINATION LAW PUBLIC POS ENFORCEMENT EMS FIRE SERVICE 1 *LOC CHOICE *LOC CHOICE *LOC CHOICE *LOC CHOICE 2 L-TAC1 E-TAC1 F-TAC1 **A-TAC1 3 L-TAC2 E-TAC2 F-TAC2 **A-TAC2 4 L-TAC3 E-TAC3 F-TAC3 **A-TAC3 5 L-TAC4 E-TAC4 F-TAC4 **A-TAC4 6 S-TAC1 S-TAC1 S-TAC1 S-TAC1 7 S-TAC2 S-TAC2 S-TAC2 S-TAC2 8 S-TAC3 S-TAC3 S-TAC3 S-TAC3 9 S-TAC4 S-TAC4 S-TAC4 S-TAC4 10 **P-TAC1 **P-TAC1 **P-TAC1 LOC CH/ BLANK 11 **P-TAC2 **P-TAC2 **P-TAC2 LOC CH/ BLANK 12 **P-TAC3 **P-TAC3 **P-TAC3 LOC CH/ BLANK 13 **P-TAC4 **P-TAC4 **P-TAC4 LOC CH/ BLANK 14 **MINSEF **MINSEF **SW-FIRE LOC CH/ BLANK 15 P-SOA-1 P-SOA-1 P-SOA-1 LOC CH/ BLANK 16 A-SOA-1 A-SOA-1 A-SOA-1 A-SOA-1 * LOCAL CHOICE - TYPICALLY USER S DISPATCH MAIN **REGIONAL VERSION OF THIS TALKGROUP HOW TO FIND ZONE NAME The Incident Command Zone or ICS Zone shall be designated with the prefix IC in all display radios. ZONE LOCATION IN RADIO It is highly recommended that the IC Zone be located immediately adjacent to (either above or below) the users primary day to day zone in display radios. It is highly recommended that the IC Zone be located in the C Zone in non-display radios with an A/B/C zone selector switch. SERVICE BRANCH TALK GROUPS If there is space available it is recommended that the four service branch specific statewide talkgroups also be located in the respective users primary day to day zone, (typically zone A or zone 1) in addition to the ICS Zone. FOLD FOLD CUT WHEN TO USE PRIMARY USE Major mutual aid incidents involving joint response from multiple agencies and/or service branches. Interoperability incidents may be localized or dispersed in area and may be preplanned or emergent in nature. Participating incident personnel and resources may be localized, regional, statewide or national. SECONDARY USE On a secondary basis, if other talk groups are not available, the shared statewide incident response talkgroups may be used for day to day and task force type interoperability requirements among multiple agencies. Use for major incident drills and exercises is encouraged. NON PERMITTED USE The statewide talkgroups are not to be used for daily routine operations. FOLD HERE 1ST PLAIN ENGLISH UNIT IDENTIFICATION When operating on the shared statewide incident response talkgroups, users should initially identify in the following manner using plain English: Agency name, followed by service branch or function designation, followed by call sign or unit number. Examples: "North EMS 512", "Elk River Police 512", "Washington County Public Works 512", "State Patrol 512", etc. Once established, ongoing communications between the same units may be shortened. USE OF 10-CODES AND ACRONYMS The use of 10-codes, signals, unique acronyms, and other codes should not be used on the statewide incident response talkgroups because there is no standardized set of codes. Plain English should be used in all cases. FOLD FOLD HOW TO USE ASSIGNMENT OF TALK GROUPS When a statewide talkgroup resource is needed contact the controlling dispatch center, or the Incident Commander as appropriate, to have the next available system wide talkgroup assigned based on the following order of use. ORDER OF USE FOR EMERGENCIES The usage of STAC, ETAC, FTAC, and LTAC talkgroups for emergencies should be: _TAC 1, 2, 3, 4 in that order. ORDER OF USE FOR PREPLANNED EVENTS The usage of STAC, ETAC, FTAC, and LTAC talkgroups for preplanned events should be: _TAC 4, 3, 2, 1 in that order. TRACKING Dispatch centers on the ARMER system will keep track of assignments on a "status board" window on their dispatch consoles. PRIORITY OF USE MULTIPLE INCIDENTS In the event multiple interoperability incidents occur simultaneously exhausting the shared statewide incident response talkgroups, assignment of STAC, ETAC, FTAC, and LTAC talkgroups in incident radio communications plans will be prioritized for those incidents involving resources spanning multiple regions. Localized or single region incidents initially assigned to shared statewide incident response talkgroups should be reassigned to regional or local coordination talk groups such as the regional PTACs and ATACs. INCIDENT RADIO COMMUNICATIONS PLAN Major incidents should have a written radio plan (ICS-205) that keeps track of talk groups, mutual aid channels, swap radios, cross patches and other communications resource assignments. CUT CUT CUT

ARMER Public Safety Communications System Standards, Protocols, Procedures Document Section: 3-Interoperability Standards Status: Sub-Section: State - Addendum 1 Procedure Title: Alternate All Branch Incident Command Zone for 800 MHz Statewide Incident Response Talkgroups: STACs, ETACs, FTACs, & LTACs Date Established: SRB Approval: Replaces Document Dated: Date Revised: 1. All Branch IC Zone Established The following alternate All Branch STANDARDIZED INCIDENT COMMAND ZONE may be implemented either in addition to, or in lieu of, the service branch specific STANDARDIZED INCIDENT COMMAND ZONE specified in Section 4 of ARMER Standard. If the All Branch zone is used, all 16 Statewide Incident Response talkgroups shall be included and they shall be programmed exactly in the order specified below in order to maintain consistency and to facilitate a potential future renaming to these talkgroups to STAC 1-16 as part of ARMER 3.0. The All Branch zone may be implemented in any radio regardless of service branch. This All Branch IC Zone is programmed into all Strategic Technology Reserve cache radios positioned throughout the State, and is recommended for inclusion in all other cache radios. Pos All Branch IC Zone 1 STAC-1 2 STAC-2 3 STAC-3 4 STAC-4 5 LTAC-1 6 LTAC-2 7 LTAC-3 8 LTAC-4 9 FTAC-1 10 FTAC-2 11 FTAC-3 12 FTAC-4 13 ETAC-1 14 ETAC-2 15 ETAC-3 16 ETAC-4 2. Limited Cross Service Branch Sharing Permitted In the event multiple simultaneous incidents throughout the State exhaust all available branch specific talkgroups and STACs, and additional talkgroup resources are needed, talkgroups from other service branches may be used on a secondary basis. Any such assignment shall only be made by the dispatch center controlling the incident, the Incident Commander, or the incident Communications Unit Leader (COML). State All Branch IC Zone Page 1 State Addendum 1