Work Plan for 2015 Pre- Construction Avian and Bat Surveys Swanton Wind Project

Similar documents
Work Plan for Pre-Construction Avian and Bat Surveys

DRAFT Mad River Wind Project Avian and Bat Survey Work Plan:

Appendix G. Avian and Bat Work Plans

Chokecherry and Sierra Madre Wind Energy Project

OHIO DIVISION OF WILDLIFE AND USFWS (OH FIELD OFFICE) GUIDANCE FOR BAT PERMITTED BIOLOGIST April 2015

From: Cris Hein & Todd Mabee, ABR, Inc. Environmental Research & Services

THE USE OF ACOUSTIC TRANSECTS TO DOCUMENT CHANGES IN BAT DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE. Eric R. Britzke & Carl Herzog

Deer River Wind Farm 16-F-0267 APPENDIX G

Summary of Acoustic Bat Surveys on the NorthMet Project Area October 3, 2014

Baseline Bat Acoustic Analysis for the Green River Proposed Wind Energy Site: Summary of 2011 Fall Field Season

Monitoring Bat Species Diversity in the Northern Thumb Area of Michigan Through the Use of Mobile Surveys

Summer and Early-Fall 2009 Peregrine Falcon Use Surveys

Work Plan for Pre-Construction Avian and Bat Surveys

GUIDELINES for CONDUCTING BIRD and BAT STUDIES at COMMERCIAL WIND ENERGY PROJECTS. Prepared by

2014 Mobile Acoustic Bat Survey and Summer Bat Count Results

Pre and Post-Construction Monitoring of Bat Populations at Industrial Wind Turbines Sites

The following protocols should begin as soon as feasible after identification of a diurnal roost (ideally that night):

Working with others to conserve, protect, and enhance fish, wildlife, plants, and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American people.

Bats in Alaska: Citizen Science and Field Research Give New Insights about their Distribution, Ecology, and Overwintering Behavior

DRAFT. GUIDELINES for CONDUCTING BIRD and BAT STUDIES at COMMERCIAL WIND ENERGY PROJECTS. Prepared by

Below I will comment on the Stantec submission (quoted in dark blue) that illustrate this poorly planned research:

RAPTOR SURVEYS CONDUCTED AT NEAR WEST 2013 RESOLUTION COPPER MINING

Update on Northern Long-eared Bat in Minnesota

Prepared For: Marble River, LLC 4300 Wilson Boulevard Arlington, VA and Horizon Wind Energy 1001 McKinney Suite 1740 Houston, TX 77002

Subject: Comments on FWS R5 ES , Environmental Impact Statement for Beech Ridge Energy s Habitat Conservation Plan

Bald Eagle Annual Report February 1, 2016

Black. LWECS Site Permit. Stearns County. Permit Section:

Naval Station Newport Newport, Rhode Island

INDIANA BAT SUMMER SURVEY GUIDANCE PART DEUX. Robyn Niver, Mike Armstrong, and Andrew King U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Stillwater PGM-Cu Project Whip-poor-will and Common Nighthawk Survey 2013

INTERIM SUMMARY BAT ACOUSTIC MONITORING AT THE PROPOSED BLUE CREEK WIND FARM, PAULDING AND VAN WERT COUNTIES, OHIO

Memorandum. To: Heritage Wind, LLC. From: Justin Zoladz. Date: October 30, Re: 2017 Spring Migratory Raptor Survey Results

2009 Spring, Summer, and Fall Avian and Bat Surveys for the Groton Wind Project in Groton, New Hampshire

APPENDIX E. Bat White Paper

Sage-grouse and Bats: Management through Conservation Planning. Jericho Whiting Gonzales-Stoller Surveillance, Idaho Falls

Appendix D-11. Summary Bat Roost Assessment Surveys

Appendix C-2. Nesting Bird Survey

Groton Wind, LLC P.O. Box 326 Concord, NH Prepared for: Prepared by: Stantec Consulting 30 Park Drive Topsham, ME 04086

Stetson I Mountain Wind Project Year 1 Post-Construction Monitoring Report, 2009

Species Conclusions Table

To: EverPower From: Stantec Consulting Services Inc. NYSDEC. 30 Park Drive Topsham, ME File: Date: February 11, 2014

Overview of Montana Bat Conservation Issues and Data Needs

Long-term monitoring of Hummingbirds in Southwest Idaho in the Boise National Forest Annual Report

United States Department of the Interior

The USFWS is here to help you! An overview of the ESA process

2003 Progress Report. Acoustic Inventory and Monitoring of Bats at National Parks in the San Francisco Bay Area

Rochester Birding Association, 55 Ontario St., Honeoye Falls NY 14472

2010 Frog & Toad Survey. CR 510-Red Road-Sleepy Hollow & CR 550. Marquette County, Michigan

Appendix E Bat Study Report

Eagle Observation Surveys Arkwright Summit Wind Project Chautauqua County, New York

A Spring 2005 Radar, Visual, and Acoustic Survey of Bird and Bat Migration at the Proposed Clayton Wind Project in Clayton, New York

BATS of WISCONSIN. Wisconsin Lakes Partnership Convention March You need bats. Bats need you!

POST-CONSTRUCTION WILDLIFE MONITORING AT THE ATLANTIC CITY UTILITIES AUTHORITY- JERSEY ATLANTIC WIND POWER FACILITY

Bat Surveys. Metro Parks, Serving Summit County

Palmer s Creek Wind Farm

Pesi 593 April 17, Variance MVP-ATWS-SM-031 Detailed Habitat Assessment and Portal Searches

Discussion of California Condors and Habitat Conservation Planning in the Tehachapi Wind Resource Area. Friday - April 7, 2017 Mojave, CA

SURVEY OF BUILDINGS USED AS SUMMER ROOSTS BY BATS IN ARKANSAS

Expansion Work Has Begun The perimeter dike for Cell 7 is now visible

Pesi 593 April 17, 2018

Vermont State Report. Scott Darling & Alyssa Bennett Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department

Assessment of methlymercury availability to bats on the South River, Virginia Dave Yates and David Evers BioDiversity Research Institute

Memorandum. Introduction

Bald Eagle and Osprey Nest Survey Study Plan for Energy Northwest's Packwood Lake Hydroelectric Project FERC No Lewis County, Washington

Step-by-Step Instructions for Documenting Compliance on the Bald Eagle Form For WSDOT s On-Call Consultants

BIRDS AND BATS: Potential Impacts and Survey Techniques

Northern Pass. Transmission Project: Visual Simulations. The THE NORTHERN PASS SM. MAY 2011_v2

Bat Distribution and Habitat Use

Roberts Bank Terminal 2 Project Field Studies Information Sheet

Golden Eagle (Aquila chrysaetos) Management Indicator Species Assessment Ochoco National Forest

Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project (FERC No ) Waterbird Migration, Breeding, and Habitat Use Study Plan Section 10.15

Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus

1.1 Bat Survey Methods. Materials and Data Analysis

Prepared For: Prepared by:

Recommended Protocols for Monitoring Impacts of Wind Turbines on Birds. Draft May Environment Canada Canadian Wildlife Service

A field test of Indiana bat acoustic identification

Acoustic and Thermal IR Monitoring Project for Tree Removal at Nehelani on Schofield Barracks June 2015

Greenlaw Mountain Hawk Watch Fall 2014

APPENDIX A ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT CONDITION REQUIREMENTS CONDITION 4.0

Mystic Lake Hydroelectric Project FERC Project Number Year Bald Eagle Monitoring Summary Report Public

Written Testimony of Mollie Matteson, M.S., Senior Scientist, Center for Biological Diversity

Rocky Reach Wildlife Forum 2017 Wildlife Monitoring Proposal FINAL

Tiered Species Habitats (Terrestrial and Aquatic)

AERIAL SURVEY OF BIRDS AT MONO LAKE ON AUGUST 24, 1973

Results of Nesting Bird Survey in Support of Fiscalini Ranch Forest Test Plots, Cambria, California

Ecological Impacts of Wind Farms: Global Studies. Are Wind Farms Hazardous to Birds and Bats? Stephen J. Ambrose

Summary of the 2014 Minnesota Northern Long-eared Bat Summer Habitat Use in Minnesota Project (Preliminary Report) September 30, 2014

CARLTON COUNTY LAND DEPARTMENT FOREST BAT SURVEY REPORT CARLTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA

WindWise Education. 2 nd. T ransforming the Energy of Wind into Powerful Minds. editi. A Curriculum for Grades 6 12

Grey County Natural Heritage System Study

AMHERST ISLAND WIND ENERGY PROJECT DESIGN AND OPERATIONS REPORT. Appendix D. Environmental Effects Monitoring Plan for Wildlife

Baseline Bat Acoustic Analysis for the Proposed Blissfield Wind Energy Project: Summary of 2011 Spring Migration Field Season

Instructor Guide: Birds in Human Landscapes

A COMPUTER VISION AND MACHINE LEARNING SYSTEM FOR BIRD AND BAT DETECTION AND FORECASTING

Roberts Bank Terminal 2 Project Field Studies Information Sheet

BALD EAGLE MANAGEMENT 2014 ANNUAL REPORT

ATTACHMENT 14 NORTHEAST-POCONO RELIABILITY PROJECT AGENCY COORDINATION

Recommended Protocols for Monitoring Impacts of Wind Turbines on Birds. April Environment Canada Canadian Wildlife Service

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. My project. IPaC Trust Resource Report. Generated May 07, :40 AM MDT

Threatened & Endangered Species and T&E Habitats Encountered during Road and Bridge Projects

Transcription:

Work Plan for 2015 Pre- Construction Avian and Bat Surveys Swanton Wind Project Swanton Wind Project Swanton, Vermont Prepared for: Vermont Environmental Research Associates 1209 Harvey Farm Road Waterbury Center, Vermont Prepared by: Stantec Consulting 55 Green Mountain Drive South Burlington, VT 05403-7824

Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 1 2.0 ACOUSTIC BAT MONITORING... 1 3.0 BREEDING BIRD SURVEYS... 3 4.0 DIURNAL RAPTOR MIGRATION SURVEYS... 4 5.0 REPORTING... 5 i

1.0 INTRODUCTION In winter 2015 Vermont Environmental Research Associates (VERA) contracted Stantec Consulting Services Inc. (Stantec) to develop the following bird and bat survey methods in support of a wind turbine project being developed in Swanton, Vermont (Project) by Swanton Wind LLC. The Project would include approximately 7 wind turbines with associated collector lines and access roads. Wind turbines are expected to have a maximum height of up to 153 meters (500 feet). The surveys described in this document were designed to assess bird and bat activity and presence/absence within the Project area. The proposed Project is located in the southwest corner of the town of Swanton, within Franklin County, Vermont (Figure 1). The Project area straddles a ridge running north-south roughly between Vt-105 and Fairfield Pond. The ridge is poorly-defined; more defined in the north than in the south. Elevation ranges from approximately 170 meters (558 feet) on the access road to approximately 300 meters (984 feet) along the ridge. This low-elevation ridge is primarily forested, with a high tree canopy. An open-water wetland exists to the northeast, and a saddle bisects the ridgeline. Stantec has based this work plan on the Vermont Agency of Natural Resources (VANR) Draft Vermont Wind Power Guidelines (VANR Guidelines; April 2006), the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Land-Based Wind Energy Guidelines (USFWS Guidelines; March 2012), and Stantec s experience working on other proposed and constructed wind facilities in Vermont. Preconstruction bird and bat surveys proposed at the Project include: Spring, Summer, and Fall Acoustic Bat Monitoring Breeding Bird Surveys Spring and Fall Diurnal Raptor Migration Surveys The following sections describe in detail the methods for each of the surveys planned at the Project. 2.0 ACOUSTIC BAT MONITORING The passive acoustic bat survey was designed to (1) sample the level and timing of bat activity at the Project area, and (2) determine presence or absence of state- and federally listed bat species, including the northern long eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis). To achieve both objectives, a mixture of full-spectrum and zero-crossing detectors will be used. Zero-crossing detectors have been employed at numerous wind facilities across the United States based upon their ability to be deployed for long periods of time and their ability to detect all species of bats known to occur in Vermont. Data collected from zero-crossing detectors can determine activity 1

V:\1956\active\195601049\drawing\mxd\01049_01_Loca tion_draft.mxd Revised: 2015-04-02 By: bkramer NY VT QC MA NH $ ( $ FAIRFIELD Approximate Bat Detector Location (Anabat and SM2; heights to be determined by landscape features) SWANTON Approximate Bat Detector Location (Anabat high on MET tower; SM2 low in vicinity) " Approximate Bat Detector Location (SM2 low) T5! Z "! Z "! Z " %Ia T4 T2 T3 T1 T7 T6! Z " Approximate Bat Detector Location (Anabat; height to be determined) ST. ALBANS TOWN 0 2,000 Feet 1 inch = 2,000 feet (At page size of 8.5"x11") Disclaimer: Stantec assumes no responsibility for data supplied in electronic format. The recipient accepts full responsibility for verifying the accuracy and completeness of the data. The recipient releases Stantec, its officers, employees, consultants and agents, from any and all claims arising in any way from the content or provision of the data. 30 Park Drive Topsham, ME USA 04086 Phone (207) 729-1199 Prepared by EMK on 2015-03-09 Reviewed by NED on 2015-03-09 01049_01_Location_DRAFT.mxd Legend! Z " Approximate Bat Detector Location " Proposed Raptor Survey location %Ia Approximate MET Tower Location Proposed Turbine Location (approx.) Project Boundaries (approx.) Township Boundary Client/Project Swanton Wind Project Swanton, Vermont Figure No. 1 Title Site Location - DRAFT 4/2/2015 195601049

patterns for species groups and some specific species, and is useful for comparison among other publicly available data. Call files from the three long-distance migratory species found in Vermont can be easily identified using zero-crossing detectors (red bat [Lasiurus borealis], hoary bat [Lasiurus cinereus], and silver-haired bat [Lasionycterus noctivagans]). These three species are also the most common fatalities observed at operating wind facilities across the United States. Zero-crossing detectors are less reliable when trying to identify resident bat species presence (Myotis species and the tri-colored bat [Perimyotis subflavus]). These species are listed as threatened and endangered in the state of Vermont, and have undergone large populationlevel impacts due to White Nose Syndrome (WNS). Full spectrum detectors are becoming widelyused and widely-accepted for bat species identification as new detector models become available which are more easily-deployed for long survey periods. Because full spectrum detectors record the entire sound of the bat call there is more information available to determine species. Further, new software packages are available to automatically identify call files to species. While automated software is becoming more reliable, it should not be depended-upon to identify species presence without the use of follow-up visual inspection of the identified files. Stantec will conduct acoustic bat surveys in the Project area from April 15 to September 30, consistent with time frames recommended by state and federal regulatory agencies for proposed wind power projects, and in consideration of VANR s draft guidelines (2006). We will employ a mix of detectors consisting of three SM2 detectors (full-spectrum detectors; Wildlife Acoustics, Inc.) and three Anabat detectors (zero-crossing detectors; Titley Electronics Pty Ltd.). Stantec will deploy detectors in four general locations throughout the Project area (Figure 1): Area of Turbines 6 and 7: An Anabat detector and an SM2 detector will be deployed in between the proposed locations for Turbines 6 and 7. Here, the Anabat detector will be deployed at as high as possible above ground level by utilizing either a natural feature or a portable tower to achieve height. An SM2 detector will be deployed near ground level at the edge of a clearing or along other features adjacent to a clearing that may be conductive to bat travel or foraging (e.g., along a trail or road). Onsite meteorological (MET) tower: An Anabat detector and an SM2 detector will be deployed in this area. One Anabat detector will be deployed as high as possible above ground level in the MET tower. An SM2 detector will be deployed near ground level in an appropriate setting in the vicinity of the MET tower. Saddle bisecting the ridgeline: One SM2 detector will be deployed near ground level in an appropriate setting along the saddle that bisects the ridge. Southern end of the Project area: One Anabat detector will be deployed as high above ground level as possible in the vicinity of the proposed Turbine 5. 2

The timing of the bat acoustic surveys coincides with the spring migration, summer residency, and fall migration activity periods for bats and is consistent with VANR recommendations. The detectors will sample from approximately ½ hour before sunset until ½ hour after sunrise on a nightly basis throughout the survey period. Detectors will be visited approximately every 2 weeks to download data and check the condition of the detectors. SM2 detectors will be deployed with the microphone at the end of a cable to avoid poor-quality calls generated by echoes off of the detector box. Stantec will analyze the 2015 data using visual analysis and automated species identification software, depending on the type of detector. For data recorded by Anabat detectors, all files will be separated from noise (i.e., static) files based on visual inspection. Two Stantec biologists with experience identifying bat call sequences will independently assign call sequences to species group or species (when possible), allowing for quality assurance and control of call assignments. For Anabat data, calls from the genus Myotis will be categorized as a group due to similarities between call signatures of the species included in this genus and the associated decrease in identification confidence. For SM2 detectors, analysis will be performed using automated call analysis software (Kaleidoscope or Sonobat) to identify calls to species, including Myotis species. Stantec will review the results of automated species identification and provide an evaluation of the likelihood that rare species are present based on a combination of visual quality assurance, quality control and analysis of the output of identification software. Note that the methods do not follow the USFWS s recommendations for rare bat species presence using acoustic detectors, although automated species identification software may still indicate presence of rare bat species. To describe bat activity levels in relation to weather variables, Stantec will obtain weather data from the onsite met towers. Weather data will include average nightly wind speed and average nightly temperature. Survey results from all 3 seasons will be combined into a single final report following the completion of the fall survey. The report will include analysis, a results summary, and discussion of 2015 survey results. The report will summarize the number of call sequences by detector, detection rate overall and by detector, timing of activity, and species composition. Temperature and wind speed data will be compiled from the on-site met tower. Any relationships between weather and bat activity patterns will be discussed in the report. Acoustic files will be made available to VANR upon request. 3.0 BREEDING BIRD SURVEYS Stantec will conduct breeding bird surveys (BBS) in spring/summer 2015 to characterize presence of breeding birds heard or visually identified in the Project area. Surveys will be conducted in accordance with United States Geological Survey (USGS) BBS techniques, which are consistent with those conducted at other proposed wind power projects in Vermont. Surveys will focus on assessing the presence of species of concern in the Vermont Wildlife Action Plan (2005) priority list that would be expected to occur in the Project area, but will evaluate all breeding birds 3

heard or visually identified during the field surveys. Data from the North American and the Vermont Breeding Bird Atlas will be reviewed prior to conducting field surveys. Stantec biologists will conduct 1 breeding bird field survey in May and 2 in June. BBS surveys will consist of point count surveys to count singing male birds or birds seen during a 10-minute sampling period. BBS surveys will occur at approximately 20 survey points spread throughout the Project area: one point at each proposed turbine location and the remainder distributed among habitat types and significant features. (Habitat mapping is ongoing, so we will use the most current data available to us prior to commencing the survey.) This methodology will result in the sampling of representative habitats. During each point count, all species heard or visually detected, the number of individuals, and each bird s estimated distance from the observer s location (0-50 m, 50-100 m, greater than 100 m, flyover) will be documented. Point counts will be marked and logged with a GPS unit. Breeding birds observed incidentally between points or outside the 10-minute surveys also will be recorded. Surveys will occur on fair-weather days, when weather variables (e.g. temperature above 35 degrees Fahrenheit, light wind speeds, no precipitation or light drizzle) do not hinder the observer s ability to detect singing birds. Data will be recorded on standardized datasheets and will be summarized to determine species richness, relative abundance, species frequency, and community diversity. 4.0 DIURNAL RAPTOR MIGRATION SURVEYS The purpose of the raptor migration surveys is to document the species composition and flight patterns of migrating raptors passing through or in the vicinity of the Project area. Raptor migration surveys provide baseline information regarding species use and activity, and the location of flight paths within the study area. Survey methods are consistent with recommendations in both the VANR Guidelines and the USFWS Guidelines. Study protocols will be based on methods outlined in the VANR Guidelines and those developed by Hawk Migration Association of North America (HMANA), and HawkWatch International. Survey methods and data analysis will be similar to those used at other nearby wind power projects to allow for comparison between projects and to provide context for results. Stantec will conduct 10 diurnal raptor surveys at the Project in spring (early April to late May) and 10 in fall (mid-august to late October) 2015. Surveys will be conducted by 1 Stantec biologist with experience conducting raptor migration surveys in Vermont. The survey location with the best available view of the study area is located on the access road (Rocky Ridge road). This location is outside the Project area but provides an unobstructed view of the entire west slope of ridge (Figure 1). This location provides the best opportunity to document any raptors using the Project area ridge and allows more accurate flight height estimation using the visible meteorological tower as a reference. Additional survey locations do exist within the Project area but due to forest structure and canopy height these locations have very restricted views of the 4

ridgeline. The survey location used will be finalized through discussion with VERA and ANR. The selected survey location will remain the same for all surveys. Surveys will target days with optimal weather for raptor migration, including fair days with thermal development with winds generally from a southerly direction in spring or northerly direction in fall. Surveys will be conducted from 9 am to 4 pm. During this time period, the biologist will scan the sky with bare eyes, binoculars, and/or a spotting scope. Hourly weather conditions, including wind speed and direction, temperature, percent cloud cover, and precipitation, will be documented. Observation data will be recorded for all raptors observed on Stantec s standardized datasheets, including species, number of individuals, flight behaviors, flight location, flight time, topography below the raptor, flight height, flight direction, and duration of observation at or below proposed turbine height. Raptor flight paths will be drawn on Project maps. Raptor observations will be prioritized; however, observers will also document incidental observations of other birds, particularly large flocks of birds or rare species. Data will be analyzed and summarized by hour, day, and for the season, and average passage rate, species composition, and average flight height will be calculated. Figures and photos showing the viewshed from the survey location will be included in the final report. 5.0 REPORTING In general, it is most efficient to draft a single comprehensive report discussing results of the avian and bat surveys described above. However, given the proposed permit filing timeline of fall 2015, Stantec proposes to draft individual reports for each survey conducted at the Project so that all possible results can be shared with ANR prior to filing permit applications. For each report, the timing, species composition, and observation rate will be compared to publicly available results from other wind projects in Vermont and the Northeast. Fall raptor data will be compared to data from the Montreal West Island Hawk Watch, Quebec, Canada, (60 miles northeast of the Project) while spring data will be compared to Eagle Crossing Hawk Watch, SW Quebec, Canada also 60 miles northeast. The report will follow typical scientific reporting standards and will include Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion sections. Reports will include appropriate photographs, tables, and figures. Draft reports will be submitted to VERA and to VTDFW and USFWS for review and comment. 5