GOVERNMENT PROMOTION OF HIGH- POTENTIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND VENTURE CAPITAL Josh Lerner Harvard Business School and Private Capital Research Institute
ECONOMISTS HAVE LONG UNDERSTOOD LINK BETWEEN INNOVATION AND GROWTH Two ways to grow: More inputs (capital, labor, ) Smarter use of inputs (innovation). Widespread consensus: At least 85% of growth in Western nations can only be explained through innovation. 3
ENTREPRENEURSHIP IS AN IMPORTANT PART OF THE ANSWER Haltiwanger and co-authors look at job creation in U.S.: Once carefully control, small firms have little advantage in new job creation, But huge advantage for young firms: Essentially all growth from firms <3 years old. Source: Haltiwanger, et al. [2010]
ENTREPRENEURSHIP IS AN IMPORTANT PART OF THE ANSWER (2) Acs and Audretsch [1988] look at 100s of key innovations in second half of 20 th century: Small firms contribute disproportion share of major innovations. Contribution was greatest in immature industries which were relatively unconcentrated. Consistent with models of technological competition (Reinganum [1989]).
ENTREPRENEURSHIP IS AN IMPORTANT PART OF THE ANSWER (3) Kortum and Lerner [2000] look at relationship between venture capital and innovation: Look at evidence across 20 industries, using patenting and other proxies for innovation: Also control for corporate R&D, etc. Venture capital appears ~3 to 4 times more powerful than corporate R&D. Even after control for causality concerns. From late 70s to mid-90s, VC was only 3% of corporate R&D, but responsible for ~10%-12% of privately funded innovations.
HENCE, DESPERATE NEED FOR GREEN SHOOTS
BUT ENTREPRENEURSHIP GROWTH ENGINES SPUTTERING Hard to see conclusively but Declining job creation from small firms. Declining financing availability. Downturn in venture activity world-wide since crisis. Concerns of wide-spread disillusionment of investors.
Source: EVCA, NVCA.
RETURNS BEFORE AND AFTER Vintage Years: 1990-98 Vintage Years: 1999-2005 U.S. 37% 0% Europe 8% -5% Source: Thomson/Reuters. Data as of 12/31/11. Numbers are capital-weighted average IRRs,
WHY A GOVERNMENT ROLE? Increasing returns to scale Much easier to do 100 th deal than the first: Knowledge and expectations of entrepreneurs. Familiarity of intermediaries. Sharing of information among peers. Comfort level of institutional investors. Economists term these externalities. In these cases, government can frequently play a catalytic role.
ILLUSTRATIONS FROM HISTORY In the U.S.: Critical role of SBIC program. Established in 1958. Many early VC firms started as SBIC awardees, then opted out. Building critical infrastructure : Lawyers, data providers, etc. Similar insights from Israel, Singapore, etc. Suggests that some of funding should be directed to growing industries!
BUT TWO FUNDAMENTAL PROBLEMS Incompetence: Often, relatively little familiarity with worlds of entrepreneurship and venture capital. Many well-intentioned efforts are poorly executed. Capture : Public efforts can be directed to well-connected parties, who seek to benefit themselves.
THE LABOR FUND FUND INITIATIVE Canadian government introduces tax credits in effort to boost industry. Differentiated in terms of capital sources, investment managers, and practices. Consequences: Surge in fundraising by inexperienced funds: 10X increase in funds. Intensifies overheating of the market. Among established funds, many exit to U.S. investing.
THE STIMULUS CLEANTECH INITIATIVE U.S. government sought to encourage cleantech firms as part of 2009 Recovery Act. Large grants by DOE to a few firms, totaling at least several billion: Equal to or exceeding venture activity in segment. Non-transparent process for awards: Many firms and VCs hired lobbyists to get access. Many awardees or venture backers of firms proved to be donors. Many venture backers held off investing until it was clear who would get awards.
THREE KEY PRINCIPLES Making sure table is set. Ensuring effective design by listening to the market through matching fund requirements. Avoiding self-defeating design errors.
1. TABLE SETTING Ensuring high potential entrepreneurship is attractive: Tax regime: Studies suggest critical role of capital gains vs. income effective tax rate differential. Easing formal and informal sanctions on involvement in failed ventures. Singapore s Phoenix award. Easing barriers to technology transfer. Entrepreneurship education for students and professionals alike. Evidence from U.K. NESTA study.
2. MATCHING FUND REQUIREMENTS Need to listen to market s dictates: Temptation to jump into popular areas. Universal temptation to share the wealth : Spreading funds out. Matching funds most appropriate way to ensure.
ILL-CONSIDERED PRESSURES FOR GEOGRAPHIC FAIRNESS 50 40 30 20 10 Firms Not in VC Regions Firms in VC Regions 0 SBIR Awardees Matching Firms
3. GETTING DETAILS RIGHT Appropriate sizing: Too small may not make a difference. Too big may flood local investor. Avoiding rules that go against what market needs. Need to ensure incentives to ensure participants do well if meet goals. Allowing to programs to evolve and adjust over time. Evaluation of managers and program itself.
ONLY PART OF THE STORY ONLY SLICE OF SME FINANCE IN GENERAL Financing Sources for Young U.S. Businesses Owner/family equity Owner/family debt Venture capital Other outside equity Bank loans-personal Bank loan-business Other outside loans Source: Robinson and Robb [2011]
FINAL THOUGHTS The critical rationale And the many pitfalls. Three key points: More than money is needed: entrepreneurship is not in a vacuum. The virtues of market guidance. Getting details right important as well. Need for patience!
Josh Lerner Rock Center for Entrepreneurship Harvard Business School Boston, MA 02163 USA 617-495-6065 josh@hbs.edu www.people.hbs.edu/jlerner 23